Environment Safeguard Monitoring Reportand livelihood benefits through improved REDD+ implementation in project areas of West Kalimantan province through Output-1 (known as FIP-1):

Environment Safeguard Monitoring Report

Grant Number: 0501-INO Semi-Annual Report December 2019

INO: Community-Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation ProjectReporting period: January - June 2019

Prepared by PT Hatfield Indonesia as the Project Implementation Support Unit (PISU) and the Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships – Ministry of Environment and Forestry as the Executing Agency, for the Asian Development Bank

This Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the Recipient. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area

January – June 2019 i FIP-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................I

LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................II

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................II

LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................III

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. V

1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1

1.1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................. 1

1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT ....................... 1

2.0 FIP-1 ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD ...................................................................................................2

2.1 SUB-PROJECT PROFILE AND LOCATIONS .............................................. 2

2.2 PROGRESS/ACTIVITIES IN JANUARY – JUNE 2019 ................................. 5

3.0 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD .................................6

3.1 ADB SAFEGUARD POLICY STATEMENT (2009) ........................................ 6

3.2 INDONESIA LAWS AND REGULATIONS .................................................... 7

4.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY ................8

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING ....................... 12

5.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION ...................................................... 12

5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION STATUS ................................................. 13

5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS ............................................... 21

6.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ............................................... 26

7.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ...................... 26

8.0 INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING............................................. 26

9.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS .......................................... 27

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................... 28

January – June 2019 ii FIP-1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. FIP-1 subprojects of 2018 - 2021.............................................................................................. 2

Table 2. Progress/activities of FIP-1 sub-projects from January to June 2019 ...................................... 5

Table 3. Institutional responsibilities for environmental monitoring. ....................................................... 9

Table 4. FIP-1 sub-project screening and categorization during S1/2019. ........................................... 13

Table 5. Environmental mitigation measures – Agroforestry Activity ................................................... 14

Table 6. Environmental mitigation measures – Community-focused infrastructure ............................. 18

Table 7. Environmental mitigation measures – The revitalization of ecotourism facilities .................... 19

Table 8. Environmental monitoring status - Agroforestry activities ....................................................... 22

Table 9. Environmental monitoring status – Revitalization of ecotourism facilities .............................. 24

Table 10. Consultation and sub-project disclosure ............................................................................... 26

Table 11. Findings and corrective actions - Institutional arrangement and responsibility .................... 27

Table 12. Findings and corrective actions – Project screening and categorization .............................. 27

Table 13. Findings and corrective actions – Agroforestry and revitalization of eco-tourism facility ..... 28

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Villages Targeted for FIP-1 Subprojects ............................................................................... 4

Figure 2. Project organization for environmental monitoring ............................................................. 12

January – June 2019 iii FIP-1

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Agreement between BPSKL and FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara For agroforestry 2019

Appendix 2 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 3 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Kayu Dujung Village

Appendix 4 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Senangan Kecil Village

Appendix 5 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Batulintang Village

Appendix 6 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Tanjung Village

Appendix 7 Proposed locations of agroforestry activity in Uluk Palin Village

Appendix 8 Minutes of meeting - Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) workshop in June 2019

Appendix 9 Forest fire protection training in Vega, Majang, and Sekulat Villages (June 2019)

Appendix 10 Feasibility study and detailed design on Microhydro power plant (Contract’s cover page)

Appendix 11 Construction of Ecotourism facilities at Sepandan Island (June 2019)

Appendix 12 Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist - Agroforestry and rubber plantation activities

Appendix 13 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Fishery cultivation

Appendix 14 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Artesian well and pipeline installation

Appendix 15 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Installation of clean water storage tank and Pipeline

Appendix 16 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Construction of green school building

Appendix 17 Rapid Environmental Assesment (REA) Checklist – Hydropower (Kayu Dujung Village)

Appendix 18 Rapid Environmental Assesment (REA) Checklist – Hydropower (Tanjung Lokang Village)

Appendix 19 Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist – Revitalization of Ecoturism Facilities

Appendix 20 Meaningful Consultation on agroforestry in Batulintang, Uluk Palin and Tanjung Villages (May 2019)

Appendix 21 GRM and Conflict Resolution Workshop, Kapuas Hulu District (27 June 2019)

Appendix 22 Appointment letter of Safeguard and GRM Focal Points

Appendix 23 The inspection of Implementation Agency in Uluk Palin Village, Kapuas Hulu District (April 2019)

Appendix 24 Minutes of meeting - BPHP and PISU coordination meeting, Pontianak (April 2019)

Appendix 25 Key notes meeting between PISU and BBTNBKDS, Putussibau (May 2019)

Appendix 26 FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara and PISU survey of agroforestry site, Batulintang Village (April 2019)

Appendix 27 Safeguard Dissemination in Sintang and Pontianak (May 2019)

Appendix 28 Attendance list of Safeguard Dissemination in Sintang and Pontianak (May 2019)

Appendix 29 GRM procedure.

Appendix 30 GRM Complaint Form

Appendix 31 Monitoring for 42.5-ha agroforestry in Radin Jaya Village

January – June 2019 iv FIP-1

Appendix 32 Monitoring for Ecotourism facilities, Sepadan Island (June 2019)

Appendix 33 BUPSHA invitation for preparation of FIP-1 Activity in 2019

Appendix 34 Minutes of meeting regarding SIS REDD+ in September 2019

Appendix 35 The DED with septic tank of green school in Vega Village, Kapuas Hulu District in 2019

January – June 2019 v FIP-1

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Impact

Assessment) ANDAL Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Impact Statement) AC Affected Community AP Affected Person AH Affected Household AWP Annual Work Plan BBTNBKDS Balai Besar Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun dan Danau Sentarum (Betung

Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park Agency) BPHP Balai Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Production Forest Management Agency) BPSKL Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (Social Forestry and

Environmental Partnerships Agency) BUPSHA Bina Usaha Perhutanan Sosial dan Hutan Adat (Business Development of

Social Forestry and Customary Forest) CBFM Community-Based Forest Management DED Detailed Engineering Design DG Directorate General EA Executing Agency EARF Environmental Assessment Review Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment FIP Forest Investment Program FMU (KPH) Forest Management Unit (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan) GHG Greenhouse Gas GPP Grievance Point Person GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IA Implementing Agency IEE Initial Environmental Examination IFC International Finance Corporation KPHP Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (Unit of Production Forest

Management) kVA Kilo Volt Ampere MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry OHS Occupational Health and Safety PAM Project Administration Manual PMU Project Management Unit PCU Program Coordination Unit PJLHK Pemanfaatan Jasa Lingkungan dan Hutan Konservasi (Conservation Forest

and Utilization of Environmental Services) PISU Project Implementation Support Unit REA Rapid Environmental Assessment REDD+ Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation,

conservation, sustainable forest management and forest carbon (“+” refers to the last three phrases)

January – June 2019 vi FIP-1

RPHJP Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Jangka Panjang (Long-term Forest Management Plan)

SAEMR Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report SFM Sustainable Forest Management SNI Indonesia National Standard SPPL Surat Pernyataan Pengelolaan Lingkungan (Environmental Management

Statement) SPS Safeguard Policy Statement TOR Terms of Reference UKL-UPL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Effort)

- Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Monitoring Effort) UPT Unit Pelaksana Teknis (Technical Implementation Unit)

January – June 2019 1 FIP-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND 1. As a pilot country of the Forest Investment Program (FIP) under Climate Investment Funds, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia (the ‘government’) prepared a forest investment plan with support from Asian Development Bank (ADB), the World Bank, and International Finance Corporation (IFC). At the request of the government, ADB proposed to administer the Forest Investment Program-1 (FIP-1) entitled “Community Focused Investments to Address Deforestation and Forest Degradation” project (the ‘FIP-1’). The FIP- 1 will support the government and customary communities in their efforts to sustainably manage forests and reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions through enhancing institutional and technical capacity and improving the livelihood of rural communities to address drivers of deforestation and forest degradation.

2. The FIP-1 will also support the implementation of community-focused and gender-responsive pilot projects for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) in the forest management units (FMUs) in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts of West Kalimantan province. Further, it will also contribute to the effective implementation of provincial REDD+ strategy and harmonization of subnational fiscal policies on REDD+ with national policies. West Kalimantan, which is a key province in the Heart of Borneo Initiative, has many forests and is the fifth largest provincial contributor to Indonesia’s carbon emissions.

3. The FIP is expected to promote inclusive growth and environmental sustainability, and it will help to achieve the objectives of other initiatives, e.g., the 2011 – 2025 National Master Plan for the acceleration and expansion of Indonesia’s economic development, National Action Plan for GHG Emission Reduction, Indonesia National REDD+ Strategic Regional Action Plan for GHG Emission Reduction, and the provincial strategy and action plan (SRAP REDD+). In parallel, the project has been designed to increase environmental and livelihood benefits through improved REDD+ implementation in project areas of West Kalimantan province through Output-1 (known as FIP-1): Implementation of community-focused and gender-responsive REDD+ pilot projects in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts. Key objectives of the FIP-1 are to improve the capacity and livelihoods of communities around forest areas in 17 targeted villages in the Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts as well as establish forest conservation.

1.2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE MONITORING REPORT 4. The main objective of the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (SAEMR) of January to June 2019 (Semester 1/2019) is to describe key activities and progress of FIP-1 including implementation and compliance with the following aspects:

Environmental safeguards applicable for FIP-1; Institutional arrangement and responsibility; Environmental mitigation and monitoring implemented including its compliance

status; Consultation, project disclosure, and capacity building; and


Grievance redress mechanism; 2.0 FIP-1 ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS FOR THE

REPORTING PERIOD

2.1 SUB-PROJECT PROFILE AND LOCATIONS 5. Based on the Project Administration Manual (PAM/2016) of FIP-1, there are several of indicative projects will be implemented during this project between 2018-2020 in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu Districts, as listed in Table 1 below;

Table 1. FIP-1 subprojects of 2018 - 2021

Activity on PAM Description

Forestry

Agroforestry

The project will develop an agroforestry system involving coffee, agarwood, rubber, and other species based on community preferences on 1,880 ha of degraded land. The agroforestry program will be implemented within the forest area in four FMUs in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu. The Implementing Agency responsible for the agroforestry activity is BPSKL (Office of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnership). BPSKL collaborates with the Forestry Office in West Kalimantan and the FMUs.

Rubber plantation The project will provide a rubber plantation in the area of 120 ha in Radin Jaya Village to add more income and investment for the local community.

Assisted Natural Rehabilitation (ANR)

ANR will be conducted for a total of 6,000 ha in four FMUs areas. The activity will include identification of the suitable area for ANR, conduct surveys and consultation to develop the ANR technical design, establishment of an agreement with communities and FMU, the liberation of natural seedlings from potential disturbance, protection from the forest fire, and regular monitoring program during the project implementation period. The Implementing Agencies responsible for this ANR activity are BPHP (Office of Production Forest Management) for ANR in production forest, BPSKL for ANR in Protection Forest, and BBTNBKDS (Office of Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park) for ANR in conservation areas.

Small Scale Infrastructures and Ecotourism

Solar panel

FIP-1 provided 250-unit solar panels for 250 households in Radin Jaya Village in Sintang District. Radin Jaya was selected, as the village was not connected to the electricity grid. The Implementing Agency responsible for this activity is BPSKL.

Micro-hydropower plant

Two schemes of community-managed micro-hydro power plants will be installed, with a capacity to produce 40 kVA along with a power network, to cover around 200 households in Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang (Kapuas Hulu District).

Clean water facilities This project will construct a total of 34 clean water facilities in 17 villages (2 units per village) in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang District. The project will improve community access to clean water and improve community health, as the majority of the community use


Activity on PAM Description rivers for daily water consumption and activities (washing and bathing).

Road rehabilitation

Rehabilitation of village roads along 2 km will be completed through this project. Access to the main road will be improved thereby reducing transportation time and costs and increase opportunities for the communities to market agricultural products.

Green school building/community building

The Green School building will be constructed in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu district. The building is designed for a community meeting facility, as well as for school students to improve their knowledge on environmental and sustainable natural resources management.

Gallery building, rubber processing building (latex sheets), coffee processing house and nursery workshop

This provision will initiate by BPHP in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu district to optimize the local commodity for business plans to increase local community income.

Ecotourism infrastructures

The construction of ecotourism facilities will increase the potential of tourism activities in National Park at Kapuas Hulu District. The activities include revitalization of Sepandan and Bukit Tekenang areas, and other areas within Danau Sentarum and Betung Kerihun National Park.

Forest fire management PJLHK through BBTNBKDS to initiate the training on forest fire protection and forest fire patrol for the local community in the national park area.

Livelihood Intervention

Beekeeping, fisheries cultivation, home gardening, and handmade textile.

FIP-1 implements community development programs including training and donation of equipment for beekeeping, fisheries cultivation, home gardening and handicraft textile for a total of 17 villages in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts.

Source: PAM (2016), Annual Work Plan (2019).

The locations of FIP-1 sub-projects are in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu districts (West Kalimantan Province) and distributed within four Forest Management Units (FMUs), namely Production FMU Sintang Utara (Unit X), Production FMU Kapuas Hulu Selatan (Unit XXI), Protection FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara (Unit XIX), and the Management Office Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park. Further, there are 17 villages targeted by FIP-1 interventions within these FMU’s areas as shown in Figure 1.

January-June 2019 4 FIP-1

Figure 1. Villages Targeted for FIP-1 Subprojects


2.2 PROGRESS/ACTIVITIES IN JANUARY – JUNE 2019 6. The progress and activities of FIP-1 subprojects conducted from January to June 2019 are explained in the following table.

Table 2. Progress/activities of FIP-1 sub-projects from January to June 2019

2018 – 2021 Plan of FIP-1 Progress/Activities up to December 2018

Progress/Activities in January - June 2019

Land based activities

1,880 ha of community-based agroforestry system of deforested land to be conducted.

Preparation and planting of the Phase-1 of the agroforestry program for 42.5 ha in Radin Jaya Village (FMU Sintang Utara) completed.

Monitoring and evaluation for the Phase-1 agroforestry in Radin Jaya village by PISU, BPSKL, and FMU Sintang Utara. The preparation of technical documents for the Phase-2 agroforestry in Kapuas Hulu (315 ha) and Sintang (215 ha) District. This activity includes establishing the agreement (dated 14 January 2019) between BPSKL and FMU on the technical design document ( Selected evidence is presented in Appendix 1). The maps of the Phase-2 agroforestry areas are presented in Appendix 2 to 7.

6,000 ha of community-based assisted natural regeneration (ANR) at degraded land to be conducted.

No progress reported on this activity.

PISU conducted a workshop on ANR on 25-26 June 2019 in Jakarta and attended by MOEF (EA, IAs, Research, and Development Agency), ADB, University, National NGO, FMUs, and PISU. The minutes of meeting of this workshop is presented in Appendix 8.

Forest fire protection (direct protection of 5,000 ha of natural forest)

Training on forest fire protection and forest fire patrol for Bungan Jaya and Tanjung Lokang villages was conducted in October 2018.

Training for forest fire protection conducted by BBTNBKDS and supported by PISU in Majang Village, Sekulat, and Vega Village on 25 - 27 June 2019. Selected evidence is presented in Appendix 9.

Livelihood Interventions

Beekeeping Training for beekeeping (stingless bee) was conducted in Senangan Kecil Village (December 2018) and Tanjung Village (October 2018).

No training on beekeeping was conducted for this reporting period.

Fisheries cultivation Training for fisheries cultivation was conducted in Senangan Jaya Village in December 2018.

No training on fisheries cultivation was conducted for this reporting period.

Handmade textile Training for handmade textile was conducted in Kayu Dujung and Bunut Villages in September 2018.

No training on handmade textile was conducted for this reporting period.

Community Focused Infrastructures

Micro-hydro power plant of 40 kilovolt-ampere (kVA) each to be installed at Kayu Dujung (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang (Kapuas Hulu District).

The desk-top study was conducted to identify potential site for micro hydropower plant in Kayu Dujung village in 2017. However, there are no follow-up activities were conducted on this matter in 2018.

Site surveys for the feasibility study (FS) and detailed engineering design (DED) for the micro hydro-power plant Kayu Dujung village and Tanjung Lokang were conducted at 22 May 2019 and 6 June 2019 respectively. Selected evidence on this matter is presented in Appendix 10.

34 units of clean water The storage tank and pipeline Nanga Sangan, Pulau Majang, and Bungan


2018 – 2021 Plan of FIP-1 Progress/Activities up to December 2018

Progress/Activities in January - June 2019

supply facilities (i.e., storage tank and pipeline) for 17 targeted villages within the FMUs

installation at Sungai Uluk Palin Village (Kapuas Hulu District) completed on 29 October 2018.

Jaya Villages (Kapuas Hulu District) and Senangan Jaya and Tanjung Sari Villages (Sintang District) have been selected as the recipients for the installation of clean water supply facility. No physical activity was conducted with this regard for this reporting period.

Rehabilitation of village pathway of up to 2-km long for 2-m wide at 17 targeted villages within the FMUs

No activities were conducted for this reporting period.

No activities were conducted for this reporting period.

Two units of green school (Facilities) Building

School building and facilities were constructed in Tanjung Sari Village, Tatay Sub-Village (Sintang District) and completed in November 2018.

Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District) has been selected as the location for the green school building. No physical activity was conducted with this regard for this reporting period.

Revitalization of Ecotourism Facilities

Construction and/or renovation of ecotourism facilities at Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park.

Sepandan area Construction of guest

houses, photo spot, and gazebo

Sepandan

The construction of the tourist gate, tour desk, additional guest house unit, and tourist information center was completed in June 2019.

Bukit Tekenang area Renovation of the existing

toilet.

No activity conducted at Bukit Tekenang area for this reporting period.

3.0 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD

3.1 ADB SAFEGUARD POLICY STATEMENT (2009) 7. According to ADB’s project categorization described earlier, the FIP is a category B project. The subprojects and overall FIP are expected to have predominantly positive impacts. The project could have some site-specific/localized adverse environmental impacts, but there will be few if any irreversible impacts and it is expected that mitigation measures can be readily implemented. Therefore, the project accepts the UKL-UPL to be the equivalent of the ADB’s IEE, provided that the ADB review concludes that the contents of UKL-UPL fulfill the requirements of ADB SPS (2009). Therefore, the contents of the UKL-UPL will need to be adjusted to include an additional description of biodiversity, grievance redress mechanism, public consultation, indigenous peoples, and others as relevant to the subprojects and required by the ADB SPS (2009).

8. In addition, each subproject is subject to environmental screening and categorization using the forms provided in the updated EARF (May 2019). Each subproject will be subject to environmental screening to assess the potential for significant impacts. The screening procedure will consolidate Indonesian (i.e., MoE regulation No. 5/2012 on the Activities and/or Businesses Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) and ADB screening criteria. Based on the information completed in the REA checklists and categorization forms, the subprojects are categorized based on the most environmentally sensitive impacts. Only category B or C (for environment) subprojects, i.e. those with less


significant impacts compared to category A project will be selected to proceed under the FIP-1 subprojects.

3.2 INDONESIA LAWS AND REGULATIONS 9. Indonesia’s relevant environmental laws and regulations which focus on managing the environmental impacts of development projects include:

Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management;

Government Regulation No. 27/2012 on Environmental Permit.

Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 5/2012 on Activities Requiring AMDAL.

Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 16/2012 on Guidance to Prepare Environmental Documents.

Regulation of West Kalimantan Province No. 3/2014 on Management and Conservation of the Environment;

Sintang District Regulation No 1/2016 on Management and Protection of Environment; and

Kapuas Hulu District Regulation No 144/2003 on The Establishment of Kapuas Hulu District as Conservation District.

10. Though the environmental categorization in PAM (2016), the FIP-1 is classified as Category B project requiring IEE (or those requiring UKL- UPL or SPPL according to the Government Regulation and Ministry of Environment regulations mentioned earlier) regulation), yet, the screening for land-based activities including advices from the respective environmental agencies of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang District has been marked as those requiring AMDAL (and potentially become Category A project) if the proposed activities/businesses are implemented in the protection forest (hutan lindung) and conservation area (kawasan konservasi). This is the case for the 40-kVA proposed micro-hydropower plants in Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang Village (Kapuas Hulu District) respectively located in protection forest and national park (conservation area).

11. The Environmental Agencies of Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts are prepared to accept that UKL-UPL (instead of AMDAL) is adequate for the proposed micro-hydropower plants provided that the MOEF provides this recommendation. Therefore, the IA/EA need to seek such recommendation letter from the Directorate General of Forest Planning and Environmental Governance (DG PKTL) of the MOEF. PISU will facilitate the process in obtaining the recommendation letter from the DG PKTL and the outcome will be reported in the S2/2019 monitoring report. Further, the IA/EA need ti seek formal advice whether the proposed micro-hydropower plants should be provided with forestry’s permits according to the prevailin permitting regimes currently enforced by the related DGs of the MOEF.


4.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY

12. The roles and responsibilities for environmental and social safeguard implementation from the relevant institutions from January to June 2019 are presented in the following table.


Table 3. Institutional responsibilities for environmental monitoring.

Institution / Roles and Responsibilities Status as of S1/2019

Program Coordination Unit (PCU) as part of the Steering Committee (SC) - Secretariat General of MoEF Oversee all FIP-1 project activities as per standards and requirements of the financing modality.

Implemented – PCU monitored the overall implementation of FIP-1 subprojects through report review, updates on safeguard implementation for the FIP program reporting.

Ensure and facilitate communication with EA and PMU on the compliance with ADB requirements.

Implemented – PCU communicated with PISU through discussion and then coordinated with EA and PMU to review on the monitoring report. PCU ensures that the EARF complies with ADB requirements. The meeting was conducted on an ad-hoc basis, and therefore no documentation was available with this regard.

Executing Agency (EA): Directorate General (DG) of Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships Coordinate with MOEF and ADB to ensure that the flow of funds is well organized.

Implemented – the DG coordinated with ADB, IA, and PISU through official communication and discussions on project financial reports, including progress on safeguard implementation.

Monitoring and evaluation for EMP implementation from Sub-Project of FIP-1.

Implemented – for Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) and community-based forest management (CBFM) design, PISU in coordination and advice from the EA, conducted a workshop in June 2019 and invited IAs, UPT, FMUs, university, and relevant authority from Kapuas Hulu and Sintang Districts (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 8).

Establish a grievance redress mechanism as described in the EARF.

Implemented - GRM according to the EARF requirement has been disseminated during the reporting period of S1/2019 (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 22).

Submit semi-annual monitoring reports (SAEMR) on EMP implementation to ADB.

Implemented – the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (including this report) is submitted to ADB.

Project Management Unit (PMU) Ensure the EMP has been implemented in the FIP-1 subprojects.

Implemented – in June 2019, PMU has assisted EA to conduct a workshop regarding Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) design, PMU has involved to organized IAs, UPT, FMUs, university, and relevant authority to ensure that ANR activity for 6000 ha at Kapuas Hulu District could be implemented properly (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 8).

Coordinates all technical aspects regarding the FIP-1 Subproject with the EA.

Implemented – The PMU through daily consultation and official communication with the EA to determine how Agroforestry is implemented in 2019, and the provision of small infrastructures. The meeting was conducted on an ad-hoc basis, and therefore no documentation was available with this regard.

Review of SAEMR submitted by PISU. Implemented – the SAEMR (this report) has already reviewed by PMU prior to submission to ADB.

Implementing agencies (IA) in Jakarta: Directorate of Business Development for Social Forestry and Customary Forest (BUPSHA)



Directorate of Environmental Services of Conservation Forest (PJLHK) Directorate of Production Forest Management Unit (KPHP) Coordinate and manage project activities including EMP activities under each agency.

Implemented – BUPSHA worked with other IAs through several cross-cutting meetings to supervise the implementation and reporting on environmental safeguard (with support from PCU). The meeting was conducted on an ad-hoc basis, and therefore no documentation was available with this regard.

Provide technical advice to the project through the UPT (at the project level)

Implemented – through meetings and discussions, BUPSHA provided AWP 2019 and procurement plan to be implemented by IAs and PISU; PJLHK delivered technical direction to BBTNBKDS to address all budget “top-up” plan issues due to safeguard activities and to KPHP to conduct regular meetings with BPHP and PISU in addressing EMP of FIP-1 subprojects (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 33).

Ensure that tender and contract documents include the EMP.

Not yet implemented – during the reporting period, the land-based activities requiring tender have not been conducted for this reporting period.

Conduct inspections of each project facility's quality control.

Implemented – Inspection and supervision on project activities were conducted along with the ADB Review Mission. During the period of Jan-Jun 2019, a mission was conducted in Kapuas Hulu and BUPSHA, visiting project sites in the National Park (Vega and Bungan Jaya), Sungai Uluk Palin Village, Batu Lintang Village, and Tanjung Village (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 23).

Implementing Agencies (IA) at the Provincial and District levels: The Agency for Social Forestry and Environmental Partnerships (BPSKL) The Agency for Production Forest Management (BPHP) The Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park Management Office (BBTNBKDS) Provide technical guidance to PISU and FMU staff in the project activities.

Implemented – from January to June 2019, all implementing agencies have provided management and administrative support for PISU through an official invitation for meeting and/or discussion regarding sub-project activity (selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 24).

Hold regular technical committee meetings to obtain direction for implementing project activities.

Implemented – between May to June 2019, several workshops and discussion have been conducted in Putussibau and Pontianak by BBTNBKDS, BPHP, and BPSKL, in order to accelerate the implementation of FIP-1 activities and the engagement plan for FMU’s for agroforestry monitoring (42.5 Ha in Sintang and technical design for the planned 530 Ha agroforestry in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang), clean water facility in Uluk Palin Village, and development of ecotourism infrastructure within the National Park (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 25).

Ensure that EMP has been implemented properly Not yet implemented – During the reporting period, the land-based activities and other community-focused infrastructures that required bids/tender system for was not yet conducted.



Communicate with the relevant directorates at the national level.

Implemented – during the reporting period, the official meeting and workshop have been conducted several times between IAs (BBTNBKDS, BPSKL, and BPHP) and EA for the budget spending. EA has also involved in several discussion with Directorate General of Climate Change Control (Ditjen PPI) related to Output 2 and 3 and with Protected Forest and Watershed Management Agency (BPDASHL) related to Agroforestry and ANR (Selected evidence on these activities is included in Appendix 34).

FMUs of Sintang Utara, Kapuas Hulu Utara, and Kapuas Hulu Selatan Supervise and monitor all activities related to the FIP-1 subprojects

Implemented – PISU and FMU Sintang Utara monitored the agroforestry (42.5 ha) in Radin Jaya Village, also weaving and NTFP (Non-Timber Forest Product) in Senangan Kecil village. In KPH Kapuas Hulu Utara, PISU supervised the proposed location for agroforestry in Batulintang Village. In June 2019, FMU also involved in the preparation of technical design document for agroforestry in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang (total plan of 530 Ha). KPH Kapuas Hulu Selatan has been involved in the selection of new villages for FIP-1 due to an overlapping activity with FORCLIME. (Selected evidence on the above activities is included in Appendix 26).

Ensure that all activities comply with the RPHJP. Not yet implemented – RPHJP documents for all three FMUs have not been approved by the MOEF.

Project Implementation Supporting Unit (PISU) Prepare various technical aspects of key-projects, including risk and impact assessments that are likely to arise during implementation; and assist the IA (at the national level) to provide monitoring report to EA

Implemented – During the reporting period, PISU provided technical assistant, specifically TOR (term of references) and the draft of the technical design documents for agroforestry 315 ha in Kapuas Hulu District and 215 ha in Sintang. In addition, PISU has completed ADB screening checklist and categorization, including mitigation measures plan to implement sub-projects, specifically in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu districts; and also developed SAEMR (this report) for IA/EA.

13. In 2019, the focal point in IA, UPT and FMU’s has been appointed by EA to accelerate the implementation of safeguard and GRM. The lines of reporting and chains of coordination for conducting environmental monitoring are provided in Figure 2.


Figure 2. Project organization for environmental monitoring

Implementing Agency Directorate of Production Forest Management Units

(KPHP)

UPTProduction Forest Utilization

Control Office – Pontianak (BPHP)

Focal Point

Program Coordination Unit

FIP Steering Commitee

Ministry of Environmental and Forestry

Executing Agency (EA)Directorate General of Social Forestry and Environmental

Partnerships (PSKL)

Project Management Unit (PMU)

Project Implementation Supporting Unit

(PISU)

ADB

Implementing Agency Directorate of Bussines

Dvelopment for Social Forestry ad Customary Forestry (BUPSHA)

UPTSocial Forestry and Environmental

Partnerships Office Kalimantan (BPSKL)

Forest Management Units (FMUs)

Implementing Agency Directorate of

Environmental Services of Conservation Forest (PJLHK)

UPTNational Park Agency

(BBTNBKDS)

Focal Point Focal Point

Focal Point

Direct line reporting

Coordination

Source: EARF and PAM, 2016, Official Letter from EA regarding Focal Point, 2019

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING 12. FIP-1 is committed to comply with both Indonesian regulation and ADB SPS (2009) on environmental safeguards. The environmental assessments of the FIP-1 are presented in the EARF (updated in 2019) and draft IEE (2016) documents. These documents are the main reference for FIP-1 subprojects to ensure its compliance with both Indonesian regulation and ADB SPS (2009). This section describes the environmental mitigation and monitoring conducted for the FIP-1 subprojects in January to June 2019.

5.1 SCREENING AND CATEGORIZATION 13. The environmental screening and categorization process was conducted in alignment with the procedures described in the EARF document (updated in 2019) to identity potential environmental impacts of the FIP-1 subprojects and define mitigation measures. The screening/categorization also determines the environmental documents required for each subproject in accordance with the requirements of Indonesian Government as well as ADB. The screening and categorization conducted for the January to June 2019 is listed in Table 4.


Table 4. FIP-1 sub-project screening and categorization during S1/2019.

FIP-1 Subprojects in 2019* ADB Requirements Government of Indonesia Requirements

Land based activities

215-ha agroforestry at Senangan Kecil, Radin Jaya, and Kayu Dujung Villages

Compliant – Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 7-1).

Not compliant – SPPL has not been submitted to the Environmental Agency in Sintang District.

315-ha agroforestry at Batulintang, Uluk Palin and Tanjung Villages

Compliant - Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 7-2).

Not compliant – SPPL has not been submitted to the Environmental Agency of Kapuas Hulu District.

Training for forest fire protection was conducted by BBTNBKS for Sekulat, Majang and Vega Village

Compliant - Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 27).

Not applicable - SPPL is not required for this activity according to Government Regulation No. 27/2012 and the EARF.

Community-focused infrastructure

Clean water tank and artesian well installation at Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages (Sintang District) - Not yet included in PAM.

Compliant - Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 9-1)

Not compliant – SPPL has not been submitted to the Environmental Agency of Sintang District.

Clean water tank and pipeline installation at Nanga Sangan, Majang Village and Bungan Jaya Villages (Kapuas Hulu District)

Compliant - Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 9-2)


Construction of green school building at Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District)

Compliant - Subproject screening and categorization completed (see Appendix 10)


Micro-hydro powerplant in Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) and Tanjung Lokang (Kapuas Hulu District)


Not compliant – UKL-UPL has not been submitted to the Environmental Agency of Kapuas Hulu District.

Revitalization of ecotourism facilities

Construction of gate, ticket post, photo spot, and gazebo at Sepandan island



Note: *Not yet included in PAM Subprojects conducted in 2018 are indicated.

5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION STATUS 14. Implementation of environmental mitigation measures for agroforestry activities, installation of community-focused infrastructure, and revitalization of ecotourism facilities including its compliance against the requirements of EARF and draft IEE in January to June 2019 are presented in Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7, respectively.


Table 5. Environmental mitigation measures – Agroforestry Activity

Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Measures

(According to EARF and IEE) Mitigation Implemented (Jan – Jun 2019) Status/Remarks

215-ha agroforestry in Sintang District and 315-ha agroforestry in Kapuas Hulu District

Design Phase (technical document)

Survey and design including improvement options of subproject activities and location

There is no or limited direct impact. However, change in subproject’s design especially activities and location options and scales may result in changing the scope or scale of environmental impacts.

Only the technical design document of agroforestry was completed for this reporting period. The meaningful consultation regarding agroforestry was conducted by PISU and FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara with the local community on targeted villages to select the appropriate locations (Selected evidence on this activity is presented in Appendix 20)

Compliant – the mitigation implemented is compliant with its requirement.

Loss of locally adapted biodiversity (flora and fauna) and habitat. Correct selection of plantation site could improve degraded habitats, absorption of rainwater, and support biodiversity.

Select local seeds for plantations, to maintain local biodiversity and ensure that plants are adapted to local conditions.

The local species for the agroforestry has been included as the main plant in the technical design document and agreed by the local community consulted.


Implement plantation activity only in degraded areas, e.g., mined-out areas.

As implemented in 2018, the proposed area of agroforestry is in degraded area with the condition of forest cover < 20%, slope < 25%, and mineral soil. All these criteria are based on the Director-General of Watershed Management and Protected Forest No. P.3/PDASHL /set /Kum.1/7/2018 about Technical Instructions on Preparation of Critical Land Spatial Data (Selected evidence on this activity is included in Appendix 2 to 7).


Avoid land-use conflicts (e.g., using the same land as food crop areas).

As conducted in 2018, the area used for the agroforestry activity is located on the state- land and has been utilized by the community for their farming area, which is ideal and suitable to meet the agroforestry objectives to shift the burning practice to more friendly farming.


Document the field condition of the land to be planted to ensure that no peatland, wetland, or native forested areas are

As the 2018 agroforestry, the proposed location for 2019 agroforestry is also outside of the peatland area (see Appendix 2 to 7).

Compliant – the mitigation implemented is compliant with its requirements.




selected for this activity.

Minimize land clearing during the operation of the plantation.

During the reporting period, the agroforestry activities on the ground have not been started. The technical design document stated that no land clearing will be required.

Not applicable – in the absence of activities on the ground.

Poor occupational health and safety (OHS) and community health practices during the construction or operation damages the health of workers (e.g., worker accidents while using farm tools) and/or community members (e.g., exposure to fertilizers and pesticides).

Include into bid documents the occupational and community health safety requirements (to be based on the IFC health and safety guidelines)

The bidding process has not been conducted in this reporting period.

Not applicable – since the bidding process has not been conducted.

Develop an Occupational Health and Safety Plan (OHSP) and Community Health and Safety Plan (CHSP) by the contractors covering all aspects of the workers’ and community safety respectively.

The bidding process has not been conducted in this reporting period.

Not applicable – since the bidding process has not been conducted.

Operation/Maintenance Phase for 42.5-ha agroforestry at Radin Jaya Village (Sintang District)

Excessive or misuse of pesticides can kill beneficial biodiversity.

Apply only certified pesticides. The Round-Up 486 SL herbicide is used for maintenance of the agroforestry plan and listed with registered number RI. 01030120001560 and published on pesticide.id (selected evidence is presented in Appendix 31-1).


Poor land clearing practices could increase soil erosion and soil nutrient loss. Poor rubber plantation farm practices could reduce soil quality, e.g., through excess erosion. Long-term application of chemical fertilizers could change physical and chemical features of the soil, resulting in soil hardening, poor soil quality, and reduced productivity.

Implement SFM (sustainable forest management) to support key ecological processes (e.g., soil improvement, water retention, biodiversity, and pollination).

Adjusted with technical design of agroforestry 42,5 ha document that no land clearing without burnt activity, adding leguminous plant to minimize run off, selecting cutting and line planting (selected evidence is presented in Appendix 31-4).


Implement management practices to reduce erosion (e.g., terracing, silt pitting), enrich soils (e.g., leguminous cover plants between the rows to assist with nitrogen fixation), and improve soil physical properties (e.g., moisture retention and infiltration)

Adjusted with technical design of agroforestry document that no land clearing without burnt activity, adding leguminous plant to minimize run off, selecting cutting and line planting (selected evidence is presented in Appendix 31-4).


With a planting density of 450 trees/ha, the Rubber plantation has not been implemented Not applicable – since the rubber




canopy of rubber plantation closes in <5 years.

during this reporting period. plantation has not been implemented

Apply only SNI certified fertilizers in the correct quantity and at the correct time.

Certified fertilizers namely organic and NPK have been used for the agroforestry activity in Radin Jaya village (based on the technical design of agroforestry and SNI 2803:2010 regarding NPK fertilizer (see Appendix 31-3).


Switch to manure or organic fertilizers as soon as possible.

Certified organic fertilizers has been totally used for agroforestry during this reporting period (see Appendix 31-2).

Compliant – the mitigation implemented is compliant with its requirement

Excess fertilizer use in the rubber plantation could damage soils, pollute water supplies for biodiversity and humans, and directly or indirectly endanger the health of the residents, livestock, crops, and wild animals.

Use only SNI approved fertilizers.

Rubber plantation has not been implemented during this reporting period.

Not applicable – since the rubber plantation has not been implemented

Prioritize the use of organic fertilizers.

Periodically monitor the nutrient state of the plants and the soil quality to determine the correct level of fertilizer application.

Do not over-fertilize.

Pesticide/herbicide runoff or waste pesticide/herbicide containers used for rubber plantation potentially contaminate soil or water supplies, endangering the health of biodiversity and humans.

Avoid the use of inorganic pesticides and herbicides.


Not applicable – since the rubber plantation has not been implemented

Regulate use of minimal chemical concentration to avoid the pesticide/ herbicide resistance.

Apply only SNI certified pesticides.

Collect and correctly manage pesticide wastes (e.g., excess chemical or packaging must be sent to a central facility).

Poor farm practices, related to the management of vegetation debris, could increase the risk of fire.

Land clearing or cleaning for plantations will be avoided or minimized.

Limited land clearing is applied primarily to remove existing vegetation to allow for planting holes and along the crop planting line as stated in the technical design of agroforestry (see Appendix 31-5).


Apply an appropriate waste management system for vegetation debris (e.g., compost the debris and use as a natural fertilizer or

The remnant of vegetation piled up on-site for composting and can be used for additional fertilizer.





soil conditioner).

Soils degraded through shifting cultivation are improved through the establishment of Hevea (rubber) plantation.

Adopt SFM practices. Rubber plantation has not been implemented during this reporting period.

Not applicable – since the rubber plantation has not been implemented. Grow legume cover crop to reduce soil

erosion.

The rubber plantation can serve as a carbon sink.

At the end of the latex production (~20 years), promote using rubberwood to make furniture, thus maintaining the carbon sink.


Not applicable – since the rubber plantation has not been implemented.


Table 6. Environmental mitigation measures – Community-focused infrastructure

Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Requirement

(According to EARF and IEE) Mitigation Implemented Status/ Remarks

Installation of clean water tanks and pipelines at Nanga Sangan, Tanjung, Bungan Jaya Villages (Kapuas Hulu District) and artesian wells in Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages (Sintang District)

Design Phase

Poor of site selection could lead to habitat loss

Minimize land opening and keep the construction site tidy

The activity during this reporting period was primarily determining the villages to be installed with the clean water supply facilities. Therefore, the mitigation requirements have not been implemented.

Not applicable for this reporting period.

Water quality degradation through poor reservoir construction practices and maintenance

Creating defined footpaths and provide temporary sanitation on-site, e.g., pit latrine, the contents of which should be disposed of in an environmentally appropriate manner.

Contamination due to poor management of construction wastes (e.g. iron, nails, wood, etc.).

Minimize the generation of waste. Construct simple domestic waste treatment

system (e.g. septic tanks)

The construction Phase of green school building at Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District)

Design

Poor land clearing practices could lead to habitat loss

Minimize land opening and keep the construction area tidy.

The design has included minimal land clearing requirement.


Contamination due to poor management of construction wastes (e.g. iron, nails, wood, etc.).

Minimize the generation of waste. Construct simple domestic waste treatment

system (e.g. septic tanks)

The design has included septic tanks and toilet (see Appendix 35).



Table 7. Environmental mitigation measures – The revitalization of ecotourism facilities



Revitalization of Ecotourism Facilities at Sepandan Island (BBTNBKDS) Kapuas Hulu District

Design Phase

Poor site selection for ecotourism facilities could lead to habitat fragmentation.

Minimize land opening and keep the construction area tidy.

Limited land clearing was carried out only at the areas needed for the gazebo, guesthouse, etc (Selected evidence of this activity is included in Appendix 6).

Compliant – the mitigation was implemented according to its requirement.

Site selection considers wildlife habitat. The ecotourism facility is located in the utilization zone of the national park where there is no endemic of flora or fauna.

Compliant – the mitigation was implemented according to its requirement


Include into bid documents the occupational and community health safety requirements (to be based on the IFC health and safety guidelines).

There is only a general requirement for contractors to have a safety standard for workers and accommodate all the safety aspects.

Not compliant- the mitigation was not implemented according to its requirement.

Develop an Occupational Health and Safety Plan (OHSP) and Community Health and Safety Plan (CHSP) by the contractors covering all aspects of the workers’ and community safety respectively.

There are no OHSP and CHSP developed for this activity. However, there are clauses in the bid document regarding general safety requirements for contractors to be implemented.

Not compliant- the mitigation was not implemented according to its requirement.

Construction and Operation Phase

Building or renovating ecotourism facilities could generate waste, harmful emissions (e.g., oil, gasoline, metals, or other chemicals), or may generate noise.

Manage all construction waste by waste management plans.

Instead of waste management plan, there is only a general requirement from relevance agency regarding a waste management to collect and transport to final disposal site. However, there is no evidence documented during this reporting period.

Compliant - the mitigation was implemented according to its requirements.

During operations, visitors will generate domestic wastewater (toilet waste) and solid waste that need to be managed.

Construct simple wastewater treatment system (e.g. septic tanks, biogas digester, etc.) to treat the domestic wastewater.

Biogas digester and toilets have been installed (Selected evidence of this activity is included in Appendix 6). A notification board to dispose the garbage into the bins.





Provide garbage bins at strategic points. Garbage bins have been provided within the project site (Selected evidence can be seen on appendix 6).


Visitors can introduce cultural norms conflicting with local social norms.

Educate visitors regarding local social norms through flyers and/or guidebooks or tour guide introduction.

Flyers, guidebooks, and/or tour guide introduction have not been developed.

Not applicable for this reporting period.

High numbers of visitors can disturb the habitat and its biodiversity.

Educate visitors on how to help protecting local flora and fauna through flyers and/or guidebooks or tour guide introduction.


5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING STATUS 15. Environmental monitoring status for FIP-1 subproject activities during the period of January to June 2019 is presented in Table 8 for agroforestry activities and Table 9 for revitalization of ecotourism activity at the National Park. No monitoring was conducted for the community-based infrastructure as there was no physical or construction activity conducted during this reporting period.


Table 8. Environmental monitoring status - Agroforestry activities Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Implemented Monitoring Parameter Monitoring Conducted Status/Remarks

42.5-ha agroforestry at Radin Jaya Village (Sintang District)

Operation/Maintenance Phase

Excessive or misuse of pesticides can kill beneficial biodiversity.

Certified pesticides as specified in the Minister of Agriculture Regulation No. 24/Permentan/ SR.140 / 4/2011 concerning the Requirements and Procedures for Registering Pesticides.

The type of certified pesticides used.

During field observation no pesticides were used by the farmers to maintain the vegetation planted (Selected evidence of this activity is presented in Appendix 31-1).

Compliant – the monitoring implemented is compliant with its requirements.


The OHS aspect is limited to precautionary measures in handling pesticides and fertilizers were verbally communicated with the local farmers' group.

The conduct of safety briefing, and the use of safety equipment and procedures to ensure the OHS of workers

No activity by local farmers regarding plant maintenance was observed during the monitoring conducted.

Not applicable – since there is no activity regarding plant maintenance.

Poor land clearing practices could increase soil erosion and soil nutrient loss.

SFM practices, such as limited land clearing without burning, agri-silviculture and planting activities along the planting line were implemented to prevent soil erosion, soil nutrient loss, and biodiversity degradation.

Soil erosion during the wet season.

During the monitoring conducted, no indication of soil erosion was caused by agroforestry activities (Selected evidence on this observation is included in Appendix 31-4).


Long-term application of chemical fertilizers could change physical and chemical features of the soil, resulting in soil hardening, poor soil quality, and reduced productivity.

Certified chemical fertilizers namely NPK has been used for the pre-plantation of agro forestry 42.5 ha (based on technical design of agroforestry and SNI 2803:2010 regarding NPK fertilizer).

Plant’s growth and health

Selected ground check showed that approximately 80% of plants can grow well (Selected evidence on this observation is included in Appendix 31-6)


Excess fertilizer use could damage soils, pollute water supplies for biodiversity and humans, and directly or indirectly endanger the health of the residents, livestock, crops, and

As stated in technical design of agroforestry, the type of fertilizers used are listed in SNI 2803:2010 specifically for NPK fertilizers.

Ensure the fertilizer used is listed or has the SNI code.

No fertilization activity was found during the observation. However, as agroforestry 2018, the type of fertilizers has the SNI code (Selected evidence is presented in

Compliant – the monitoring implemented s compliant with its requirements


Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Implemented Monitoring Parameter Monitoring Conducted Status/Remarks wild animals.

Appendix 31-3)

The certified organic fertilizers were prioritized to use beside the NPK to accelerate the growth of plants.

The provision in technical design of agroforestry

No fertilization activity was found during the observation. However, as agroforestry 2018, the type of fertilizers has the SNI code (Selected evidence is presented in Appendix 31-2).

Compliant – the monitoring implemented is compliant with its requirements

Avoid toxic chemical fertilizer and followed the SNI 2803:2010 regarding fertilizer and Ministry of Agriculture No 40/2007 regarding NPK Guidelines.

No visual degradation on surface water around the agroforestry area. The occurrence of disease to the local community due to herbicide and pesticide uses.

This mitigation action is not applicable in this reporting period as there was no fertilizer used.

Not applicable – since there was no fertilizer used.

Pesticide / herbicide runoff or waste pesticide / herbicide containers contaminate soil or water supplies, endangering health of biodiversity and humans.

The minimum doze (refer to SNI 7313:2008 on minimum residual of pesticides in soil) of pesticides was regulated in technical design of agroforestry and has been disseminated to forest farmer group (KTH) in Radin Jaya Village.

Specification of application of pesticide in the technical design. Dissemination of the technical design to agroforestry farmers group.

No fertilization activity was found during the observation. However, as in 2018, the dose of fertilizers applied has followed the regulation in the technical design document.


During the Jul-Dec 2018, no application of pesticide yet, as the planting was only finished in December.

Non-existence of waste from the chemical package.

During field observation for maintenance activities, it was found that no pesticides was used by farmers. Therefore, no used chemical packages were observed.


Poor farm practices, related to management of vegetation debris, could increase the risk of fire.

The limited clearing is allowed for the planting hole and along the planting line for the crop plant (as stated in the technical design of agroforestry)

Visual evidence on tree planting practices during the agroforestry program.

The planting of vegetation was conducted manually and therefore no specific land clearing was required (Selected evidence of this observation is included in Appendix 31-5).


The remnant of vegetation piled up on-site for composting and can be used for additional fertilizer.

Vegetation landfill and/or compost pond

No remnant of vegetation was observed, and therefore no landfill or composting required.

Not applicable - Since there was no vegetation compost pond


Table 9. Environmental monitoring status – Revitalization of ecotourism facilities

Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Measures Implemented Parameter Monitoring Conducted Status/ Remarks

Revitalization of Ecotourism Facilities at Sepandan Island (BBTNBKDS) Kapuas Hulu District

Design Phase

Poor site selection for ecotourism facilities could lead to habitat fragmentation.

Land clearing was carried out only in the surrounding of gazebo and guesthouse constructed/renovated.

The selection of location is not in the area with natural habitat.

During field observation by PISU and BBTNBKDS staff, it showed the open area within the same complex of the existing tourism facilities and minimum land clearing activity. No disturbance on natural habitat (Selected evidence of this observation is included in Appendix 32-1)

Compliant - the monitoring implemented is compliant with its requirements.

Ecotourism facility is located in the utilization zone of national park and not within the wildlife habitat of endemic species.

No indication of habitat fragmentation

Through secondary data analysis by PISU using satellite imagery and zoning maps (spatial) of BBTNBKDS including ground checks, it shows that the Sepandan area is in the utilization zone where no wildlife habitat found.


Poor occupational health and safety (OHS) practices during construction or operations at worksites could harm workers’ health (e.g., use of personal protective equipment [PPE] during construction).

Informal briefing initiated by BBTNBKDS with the contractor regarding OHS practices, specifically the use of safety equipment and workers safety during the construction period.

Procedures on OHS practices

Field observations showed that construction workers fulfil the safety aspects. Furthermore, until the end of construction activities, no work accidents occur. However, OHS procedures and implementation report for the construction works were not available.

Partially compliant – due to the absence of OHS procedures and implementation reports as defined in the mitigation requirements.

Building or renovating ecotourism facilities could generate waste, harmful emissions (e.g., oil, gasoline, metals, or other chemicals), or may generate noise.

The contractor is responsible to manage construction wastes, keep the location tidy, and incinerated on-site for small scale of waste.

No wastes are observed after the construction has been completed.

During field observations conducted by PISU, it showed that the garbage bins have been provided at Sepandan. Workers collected wastes and then incinerated on-site (Selected evidence of this observation is presented in Appendix 32-2)


Operation

During operations, visitors will generate domestic wastewater (toilet waste) and solid waste that need to be managed.

Construction of biogas digester and toilet has completed. Installation of notification boards related to disposing the garbage into

Existence of the wastewater disposal facility and notification board.

The construction of biogas digester and toilet have been completed (Selected evidence of this observation is included in Appendix 32-3)



Anticipated Impacts Mitigation Measures Implemented Parameter Monitoring Conducted Status/ Remarks

the bins and should be available within the new construction area

Visitors can introduce cultural norms conflicting with local social norms.

A signboard has been erected to provide clear message to visitors on social and environmental practices within the ecotourism facilities.

Existence of the signboard.

The signboard in the area of ecotourism installed (Selected evidence of this observation is presented in Appendix 32-4)


High numbers of visitors can disturb the habitat and its biodiversity.

Signboard will be installed within the ecotourism area.

Existence of the signboard.

The signboard in the area of ecotourism installed (Selected evidence of this observation is presented in Appendix 32-4)



6.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM BPHP conducted a workshop (on 27 June 2019) regarding conflict resolution and GRM at Kapuas Hulu District (see Appendix 21). This workshop was attended by the local stakeholders from targeted villages, relevant authority and FMUs in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu. During the workshop, PISU socialized the GRM scheme and complaint forms to all attendees through small group discussion (evidence presented in Appendices 29 - 30).

7.0 CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 16. Public consultations and project disclosure concerning FIP-1 subprojects were conducted several times between January to June 2019 through meeting, workshop and meaning consultation. These were conducted with FMUs, IAs, local stakeholders and all targeted villages of the FIP-1 as presented in following table.

Table 10. Consultation and sub-project disclosure

Date Stage/Topic Location Target Stakeholder

23– 25 March 2019

Meaningful consultation on agroforestry activities in Sintang District

Radin Jaya, Senangan Kecil, and Kayu Dujung Villages

FMU Sintang Utara, sub-district authority, key village stakeholders, local customary community of targeted villages.

15 – 19 May 2019

Meaningful consultation on agroforestry activities in Kapuas Hulu District

Batu Lintang, Uluk Palin and Tanjung Village, for 315 ha Agroforestry

FMU Kapuas Hulu Selatan and Kapuas Hulu Utara, Bunut Hulu sub-district authority, Key Village Stakeholder, local Customary Community of Senangan Kecil Village.

25 – 26 June 2019

Public consultation and workshop on ANR

BUPSHA (Jakarta) All implementation agencies, Technical Implementation Unit (UPT), FMU’s Sintang and Kapuas Hulu, Universities, and local stakeholders from Sintang and Kapuas Hulu District

25-29 June 2019

Workshops on forest protection at Kapuas Hulu District

Sekulat, Majang, and Vega Villages

National Park of Danau Sentarum agency, local stakeholders and communities, Selimbau Sub-District stakeholders, law enforcement of Selimbau Sub-district.

27- 28 June 2019

Dissemination on Grievance Readdress Mechanism

Putussibau (Kapuas Hulu District)

FMU Kapuas Hulu Selatan and Utara, sub-district authority, Key Village Stakeholder, local Customary Community of targeted villages of FIP-1 at Kapuas Hulu.

8.0 INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING 17. PISU will provide technical guidance for the environmental safeguard and implementation of the subprojects for government institutions, namely FMU’s, IA/UPT and community at the FIP-1. Further, other than environmental-social clinic session in Jakarta that was initiated by ADB Mission on May 2019, PISU and EA conducted safeguard dissemination for IA, UPT and FMU in Sintang (Kapuas Hulu District) and Pontianak at the end of May 2019. This institutional development capacity will increase understanding of IA,


UPT and FMU regarding the implementation and monitoring of safeguards in FIP-1 activities. (Selected evidence of these activities is included in Appendix 27.)

9.0 FINDINGS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 18. The following table presents finding and corrective actions related to institutional arrangement and responsibility in implementing the EMP.

Table 11. Findings and corrective actions - Institutional arrangement and responsibility

Findings Corrective Actions

(and Due Date) PIC Status/Progress

No documented evidence indicating that the EMP is included in tender and contract documents.

Include the EMP in tender and contract documents (by December 2019)

BUPSHA PJLHK KPHP

To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report.

RPHJP documents of Sintang Utara, Kapuas Hulu Utara, and Kapuas Hulu Selatan FMUs have not been finalized and approved.

Finalize the RPHJP documents and secure the required approval (by January 2020)

FMUs To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report.

Environmental monitoring of the FIP-1 subprojects implemented was not conducted properly

Conduct adequate monitoring and related documentation for the FIP-1 subprojects implemented (ongoing)

PISU To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report

19. The following table present findings and corrective actions related to the implementation of project screening and categorization according to the requirements of ADB and Indonesian Government.

Table 12. Findings and corrective actions – Project screening and categorization



Project screening and categorization for existing pathways, gallery building, latex, coffee processing house and nursery workshop have not been conducted in the 2nd semester of 2018 environmental monitoring report

Complete the screening and categorization form/checklist for the subprojects (by March 2020), particularly for subprojects to be conducted in protected areas and/or ecologically sensitive areas.

PISU To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report (S1/2020)

REA checklists not completed for the livelihood interventions, i.e., beekeeping training, fisheries cultivation and handicraft training

Complete REA checklist for these livelihood interventions (by December 2019)

PISU To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report

SPPLs have not been completed for the installation of clean water facilities in Uluk Palin, Nangan Sangan, Majang and Bungan Jaya Villages, green school in Vega Village

Complete SPPL for the installation works related to community-focused infrastructure (by December 2019)

PISU To be reported in the next environmental monitoring report.

Micro-hydro powerplant in Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) and

Complete UKL-UPL and secure the approval and

PISU To be reported in the next environmental




Tanjung Lokang (Kapuas Hulu District)

Environmental Permit prior to the installation of the micro-hydro power plant (by June 2020)

monitoring report.

20. The following table presents findings and corrective actions related to the implementation of environmental monitoring for the agroforestry activities (42.5 ha) in Radin Jaya Village and revitalization of eco-tourism facility at the Betung Kerihun and Danau Sentarum National Park

Table 13. Findings and corrective actions – Agroforestry and revitalization of eco-tourism facility



No occupational and community health & safety (OCHS) requirements are included in tender and contract documents

Include the OCHS requirements in tender and contract documents for ongoing and upcoming works (by December 2019)

BPSKL BPHP KPHP TNBKDS


No Occupational Health & Safety Plan (OHSP) and Community Health & Safety Plan (CHSP) have been developed for the FIP-1 subprojects implemented in the reporting period.

Develop a simple OHSP and CHSP for implementation by ongoing and upcoming works (by December 2019)

BPSKL BPHP KPHP TNBKDS


10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21. Key conclusions drawn from the environmental safeguards monitoring report of S1/2019 are as follows:

The role of FIP-1 institutions in S1/2019 particularly Implementing Agencies, PMU and FMU has shown a good progress to implement the EMP effectively, in terms of developing the activities’ TOR, technical design document for agroforestry and ANR, screening checklist, and mitigation measures implemented for the sub-projects in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu Districts.

Some of physical activities on the ground have not been conducted yet, including: agroforestry of 215 ha in Sintang and 315 ha Kapuas Hulu Districts; green school in Vega Village; installation of clean water facility at Sintang District (Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages) and Kapuas Hulu District (Nanga Sangan, Majang, and Bungan Jaya Villages); and microhydro-powerplant in Tanjung Lokang and Kayu Dujung Villages. This is due to delay in the procurement process and the allocation of time for implementing activities changes by IA/UPT. Therefore, corresponding environmental mitigation measures and monitoring have not been conducted on these delayed activities.


Screening and categorization have been carried out for most of the FIP-1 subproject activities, although SPPL as required by the Indonesian Government for low impact activities or those not requiring UKL-UPL have not been submitted to the related environmental agencies of Sintang and Kapuas Hulu Districts. Further, the subprojects activities in protection forest and conservation area are required to be completed with AMDAL (or EIA) as per the AMDAL regulations. The quality and completeness of the screening and categorization conducted should be improved, particularly for the FIP-1 subprojects located in environmentally protected zones and/or ecologically sensitive areas.

During the reporting period, the capacity building program for IA and FMUs was implemented through dissemination and discussions in Sintang and Pontianak at the end of June 2019.

The GRM complaint form and procedure have been discussed among the local community in Sintang and Kapuas Hulu for sub-projects activities were implemented.

22. Recommendations. Based on the conclusions presented above, the following actions are recommended:

Maximize the role of FMUs as the “institution in charge/locus owner” to supervise and monitor each sub-project and discuss with PISU regarding environmental safeguard aspects.

Conduct environmental safeguard monitoring of each subproject by related FMUs and adequately document its implementation for reporting purposes.

Implement corrective actions identified in this report according to the defined schedule and subsequently report the results.

Increase dissemination of environmental safeguards (leaflet, brochures, booklets) and facilitation of safeguard focal persons at each IAs and FMUs during environmental monitoring program. To enable this plan effectively, an adequate budget should be made available in each IAs during project supervision and monitoring.

Improve the quality and completeness of the screening and categorization, particularly for the FIP-1 subprojects located in environmentally protected zones and/or ecologically sensitive areas, among other, the proposed micro-hydropowr plants.

Seek recommendation letter from the Directorate General of Forest Planning and Environmental Governance (DG PKTL) of the MOEF whether the proposed micro-hydropwer plants and other FIP-1 subprojects located in protected areas can be exempted from the AMDAL requirement.

Secure formal advice from related DGs whether the proposed micro-hydropower plants should be provided with forestry’s permits according to the prevailing permitting regimes currently enforced by the MOEF.

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 BPSKL and FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara Agreement on Implementation of Agroforestry Activities

Appendix 2 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Radin Jaya Village

Appendix 3 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Kayu Dujung Village

Appendix 4 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Senangan Kecil Village

Appendix 5 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Batulintang Village

Appendix 6 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Tanjung Village

Appendix 7 Proposed Locations of Agroforestry Activity in Uluk Palin Village

Appendix 8 Minutes Of Meeting – 2019 Assisted Natural Regeneration Workshop

Appendix 9 Forest Fire Protection Training in Vega, Majang, and Sekulat Villages (June 2019)

Forest fire protection in Sekulat village

Forest fire protection in Majang village

Relevant Authorities attended in this training

Forest fire protection training in Majang village

Appendix 10 Feasibility Study and Detailed Design on Microhydro Power Plant (Contract’s cover page)

Appendix 11 Construction of Ecotourism Facilities at Sepandan Island (June 2019)

11-1. Tourism gate in Sepadan

11-2. Bridge and welcome banner

11-3. Guesthouse in Sepadan

11-4. Ticketing house

11-5. Bio digester for guesthouse

11-6. Garbage bin provided along tracking path

Appendix 12 Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist - Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Activities

Location(s): 215 ha in total at Senangan Jaya, Radin Jaya, Kayu Dujung Villages (Sintang District); 315 ha in total at Batulintang, Tanjung, Uluk Palin Villages (Kapuas Hulu District)

Screening Questions Yes No Remarks

A. Project Siting

Is the Project area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas?

Cultural heritage site √ In production forest area

Protected Area √ In the other usages area (APL)

Wetland √ Dominated in highly highly terraneous lands

Mangrove √ There is no mangrove forest surrounding the targeted area

Estuarine √ There is no estuarine area in targeted location

Buffer zone of protected area √ In production forest area

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In production forest area

B. Potential Impacts

Will the project cause any of the following impacts?

Increase in soil erosion and siltation? √ No land clearing activities are planned

Increase in peak and flood flows? √ Activity will minimize overland flow

Loss of downstream beneficial uses (water supply or fisheries)?

√ Locations of agro and rubber plantations are far from water sources

Impairment of ecological and recreational opportunities?

√ Agroforestry will enrich biodiversity in targeted area

Impairment of beneficial uses of traditional forests?

√ Agroforestry and rubber plantations will increase livelihood benefits for local community

Any loss of precious ecology? √ Activity will be implemented on degraded lands with poor biodiversity

Possible conflicts with established management policies?

√ Activity was discussed with the KPH – Sintang Utara dan BPSKL as IA.

Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people?

√ Planting activities will not cause involuntary resettlement

Loss of downstream ecological and economic functions due to any construction of social infrastructure (e.g., road, training or information center, office or housing)?

√ Agroforestry will not damage the downstream ecology or reduce economic function

Displacement of people or reduce their access to forest resources?

√ Activity will be implemented on lands owned by the local community

Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women and children, Indigenous Peoples or other vulnerable groups?

√ Activity will lead to improvement of livelihoods in targeted area

Uncontrolled in-migration, including the influx of workers and their followers, with opening of roads to forest area and overloading of social infrastructure?

√ Activity will be conducted by local workers and land owners.


Unnecessary loss of ecological value and decreased biodiversity by replacement of natural forest with plantation with limited number of species?

√ Agroforestry will be implemented on degraded lands. Hence, it will increase ecological value and biodiversity

Technology or land use modification that may change present social and economic activities.

√ Present social and economic activities will change in a positive way

Ecological problems as well as community health and safety hazards due to land clearance prior to reforestation (e.g., soil erosion, disruption of hydrological cycle, loss of nutrients, and decline in soil fertility)?

√ There will be no massive land clearance activities prior to reforestation in this sub-project

Other ecological problems as well as community health and safety hazards (e.g., pollution of water bodies from fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides used in the plantation)?

√ Agroforestry will use organic fertilizers and correct measurements for pesticides /herbicides to minimize ecological problems

Dangers to a safe and healthy working environment due to physical, chemical and biological hazards during project construction and operation?

√ PISU and FMUs will conduct monitoring and supervision of planting activities to ensure minimum impacts from physical, chemical and biological hazards

Social problems and conflicts related to land tenure and resource use rights.

√ Public consultations or FPIC will be conducted before implementing the activity

Social conflicts if workers from other regions or countries are hired?

√ Agroforestry will employ local workers surrounding the targeted area.

Risks to community health and safety due to the transport, storage and/or disposal of materials such as explosives, fuel, pesticide and other chemicals during construction and operation?

√ There is no storage and/or disposal of materials such as explosives, fuel, pesticides and other chemicals during construction and operation

Environmental Categorization Form – Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Activities

A. Instructions This form is to be completed and endorsed by the Project’s environmental safeguard specialist. The environment categorization of a project is a continuing process. If there is a change in the components or/and site of a project that may result in category change, the Project should submit a new environmental categorization form for re-endorsement. The old form should be attached for reference.

B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Location(s): 215 ha in total at Senangan Jaya, Radin Jaya, Kayu Dujung Villages (Sintang District); 315 ha in total at Batulintang, Tanjung, Uluk Palin Villages (Kapuas Hulu District)

C. Environment Category (according to ADB category and Indonesian Government regulation) The subproject is category C according to ADB categorization, and SPPL is accepted for this

category. SPPL statement letter is required for the subproject according to the requirements of

Indonesian Government. Comments: None.

Prepared by: PISU Environmental Specialist

Preliminary Climate Risk Screening - Agroforestry and Rubber Plantation Activities Location(s): 215 ha in total at Senangan Jaya, Radin Jaya, Kayu Dujung Villages (Sintang District); 315 ha in total at Batulintang, Tanjung, Uluk Palin Villages (Kapuas Hulu District)

Screening Questions Score Remarks*

Location and Design of project

Is siting and/or routing of the project (or its components) likely to be affected by climate conditions including extreme weather related events such as floods, droughts, storms, landslides?

1 Climate conditions will affect the sub-project and its components

Would the project design (e.g. the clearance for bridges) need to consider any hydro-meteorological parameters (e.g., sea- level, eak river flow, reliable water level, peak wind speed etc.)?

0 No need to consider hydro-meteorological parameters for the activities

Materials and Maintenance

Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions (e.g. prevailing humidity level, temperature contrast between hot summer days and cold winter days, exposure to wind and humidity, hydro-meteorological parameters likely affect the selection of project inputs over the life of project outputs (e.g. construction material)?

0 Current and likely future climate conditions will not affect the selection of project inputs

Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions, and related extreme events likely affect the maintenance (scheduling and cost) of project output(s)?

0 Current and likely future climate conditions will not affect the maintenance of project outputs

Performance of project outputs

Would weather/climate conditions and related extreme events likely affect the performance (e.g. annual power production) of project output(s) (e.g. hydro-power generation facilities) throughout their design life time?

0 Weather/climate conditions and related extreme events are not likely to affect the project performance

Options for answers and corresponding score are provided below:

Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1 - 4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project.

Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): Medium

Other Comments: None

Prepared by: PISU Environmental Safeguard Specialist

Note: *If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how climate

parameters are considered in design standards for infrastructure components, how changes in key climate parameters and sea level might affect the siting/routing of project, the selection of construction material and/or scheduling, performances and/or the maintenance cost/scheduling of project output.

Appendix 13 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Fishery Cultivation

Locations: Senangan Jaya Village (Sintang District) and Nanga Lauk (Kapuas Hulu District)


A. Project Siting

Is the Project area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas?

Cultural heritage site √ No cultural heritage was found surrounding the area

Protected Area √ In production forest

Wetland √ Dominated in highly terranes lands

Mangrove √ There is no mangrove forest surrounding the targeted area

Estuarine √ There is no estuarine area in the targeted location

Buffer zone of protected area √ In the production forest area

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ For utilization activity only.

B. Potential Environmental Impacts

Will the Project cause and of the following?

Over exploitation of fish stocks and long-term degradation of resource base?

√ Groups of the local community will manage this activity, therefore overexploitation can be avoided

Capture of non-target species and habitat damage through use of destructive fishing methods and gears?

√ Floating net cage will provide in this activity, so there will be no-target species was captured or habitat damage

Accidental damage to coral reefs by divers and fishing vessel anchors?

√ no coral reefs were found in the area of cultivation

Pollution from oil and fuel spills and bilge flushing?

√ This activity will use wood to build the fish cage

Ecological degradation resulting from clearing for conversion of coastal wetlands to fishponds?

√ Due to the activity will be conducted in the middle of river (floating net cages) therefore clearing activity will not condcuted

Social problems arising from conflicts with other site users?

√ Social conflict will a rise, due to uncommon interest for the activity

Downstream water pollution from discharge of pond effluents with drain water?

√ During the operational, the increase of water pollution will occur

Reduction of water supplies for competing uses (e.g., irrigation or domestic)?

√ The floating net cages will be conducted in the unregulated river.

Restriction of water circulation, obstruction to navigation by fish pens/cages, and reduction of stream capacity from siltation?

√ The floating cages will be conducted, therefore the reduction of stream capacity due to siltation will not occur.

Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people?

√ The floating cages will be conducted in the unregulated river.


√ The local community will participate actively to managed the benefit from this activity.


Social problems due to land tenure and use conflicts?

√ No land tenurial conflict will arise during this activity due to the location will be on the river.

Soil erosion and siltation during construction?

√ The construction of floating cages will not increase erosion and sedimentation

Noise and dust from construction? √ No heavy equipment will be involved in this activity.

Risks and vulnerabilities related to occupational health and safety due to physical, chemical, and biological hazards during project construction and operation?

√ This activity is on a small scale, and will not involve the heavy equipment. However, safety will be socialized among workers.

Reduction of water available to downstream users during peak seasons?

√ The water discharge will not reduce during the peak season, due to the availability of discharge induction from upstream

Pollution of nearby aquatic environments by pond drainage water and inadequate farm management?

√ N/A

Depletion of local fish populations by stocking of wild fry/fingerlings in ponds?

√ Local species will cultivate in floating cages

Sread of diseases and parasites from exotic cultured species or escape of pond fish to the wild?

√ The escape species from floating cages could possibly occur due to the damaged of cages.

Large population influx during project construction and operation that cause increased burden on social infrastructure and services (such as water supply and sanitation systems)?

√ This activity will not involve a large number of workers. therefore, the burden on social services will not occurs.


√ This activity will be conducted by the local community surrounding the location/village.

Icreased community health risks due to the increased incidence or the introduction of waterborne or water-related diseases?

√ This floating cages will be constructed on the unregulated river of flows, therefore, waterborne disease

Risks to community health and safety due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials likely to create physical, chemical and biological hazards during construction and operation?

√ There are no material hazard/chemical will be used during the construction.

Environmental Categorization Form – Fishery Cultivation


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Fishery cultivation Location(s): Senangan Jaya Village (Sintang District) and Nanga Lauk (Kapuas Hulu District)





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening - Fishery Cultivation Location(s): Senangan Jaya Village (Sintang District) and Nanga Lauk (Kapuas Hulu District)


Location and design of project


1 Climate conditions will affect the sub-project and its components

Would the project design (e.g. the clearance for bridges) need to consider any hydro-meteorological parameters (e.g., sea-level, peak river flow, reliable water level, peak wind speed etc.)?

0 No need to consider hydro-meteorological parameters for the activities


Would weather, current and likely future climate conditions (e.g. prevailing humidity level, temperature contrast between hot summer days and cold winter days, exposure to wind and humidity hydro-meteorological parameters likely affect the selection of project inputs over the life of project outputs (e.g. construction material)?

0 Current and likely future climate conditions will not affect the selection of project inputs


0 Current and likely future climate conditions will not affect the maintenance of project outputs



0 Weather/climate conditions and related extreme events are not likely to affect the project performance


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project.




Note: *If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how climate

parameters are considered in design standards for infrastructure components, how changes in key climate parameters and sea level might affect the siting/routing of project, the selection of construction material and/or scheduling, performances and/or the maintenance cost/scheduling of project output.

Appendix 14 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Artesian Well and Pipeline Installation

Location(s): Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages (Sintang District)


A. Project Siting Is the Project area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas?

Cultural heritage site √ In the settlement area

Legally protected area (core zone or buffer zone) √ In the other usages area (APL)

Wetlands √ On mineral soils

Mangrove √ There are no mangrove areas surrounding the location

Estuarine √ There are no estuarine areas surrounding the location

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In production forest

B. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause any of the followings?

Impairment of historical/cultural areas, disfiguration of landscape or potential loss/damage to physical cultural resources?

√ No historical/cultural areas or physical cultural resources in targeted areas

Disturbance to precious ecology (e.g. sensitive or protected areas)?

√ The project is located in the settlement area

Alteration of surface water hydrology of waterways resulting in increased sediment in streams affected by increased soil erosion at construction site?

√ No soil erosion will occur during the construction activities

Deterioration of surface water quality due to silt runoff and sanitary wastes from worker-based camps and chemicals used in construction?

√ Workers will be employed from the local community. No need for worker-based camps.

Increased air pollution due to project construction and operation?

√ The activity will not involve heavy equipment. It will not increase air pollution

Noise and vibration due to project construction or operation?

√ The activity will not involve heavy equipment

Involuntary resettlement of people (physical displacement and/or economic displacement)?

√ The activity will not lead to involuntary resettlement


√ The activity will lead to economic improvement for the local community, particularly for woman and children

Poor sanitation and solid waste disposal in construction camps and work sites, and possible transmission of communicable diseases (such as STI's and HIV/AIDS) from workers to local populations?

√ No construction base camps are needed for workers in this project.

Creation of temporary breeding habitats for diseases such as those transmitted by mosquitoes and rodents?

√ Breeding habitats will not be created in this activity


√ Workers will be from the local community


Large population influx during project construction and operation that causes increased burden on social infrastructure and services (such as water supply and sanitation systems)?

√ Construction activities will be conducted by community group, supervised by contractors. An increase in burden on social infrastructure and services is not anticipated.

Risks and vulnerabilities related to occupational health and safety due to physical, chemical, biological, and radiological hazards during project construction and operation?

√ No hazardous materials will be used during construction or operations

Risks to community health and safety due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials such as explosives, fuel and other chemicals during construction and operation?

√ No hazardous materials will be used in this activity

Community safety risks due to both accidental and natural causes, especially where the structural elements or components of the project are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning?

√ Operations and decommissioning will be supported and supervised by contractors

Generation of solid waste and/or hazardous waste?

√ Solid wastes will not be produced during operations. Mitigation actions will minimize the impact.

Use of chemicals? √ No chemical materials will be used during construction

Generation of wastewater during construction or operation?

√ Wastewater will not be produced during operations. Mitigation action will minimize the impact.

Environmental Categorization Form – Artesian Well and Pipeline Installation


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Artesian Well and Pipeline Installation Location(s): Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages (Sintang District)





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening – Installation of Clean Water Facility Location: Tanjung Sari and Senangan Jaya Villages (Sintang District)




0 The project will not be affected by climate conditions, including extreme weather


0 Hydrological parameters are not primary factors influencing the project design



1 Water balance factors (input and output of water), which are affected by weather and climate conditions, will affect the project input


0 Current weather conditions and likely future climate conditions will not affect the project scheduling and costs for maintenance activities



1 Weather/ climate conditions will affect the project performance during operations


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project. Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): Medium


Prepared by: Environmental Safeguard Specialist

Note: *If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how

climate parameters are considered in design standards for infrastructure components, how changes in key climate parameters and sea level might affect the siting/routing of project, the selection of construction material and/or scheduling, performances and/or the maintenance cost/scheduling of project outputs

Appendix 15 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Installation of Clean Water Storage Tank and Pipeline

Location(s): Nanga Sangan, Pulau Majang, and Bungan Jaya Villages (Kapuas Districts)




Legally protected Area (core zone or buffer zone) √ In the other usages area (APL)

Wetland √ On mineral soils



Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In production forest

B. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause any of the following?

Impairment of historical/cultural areas; disfiguration of landscape or potential loss/damage to physical cultural resources?


Disturbance to precious ecology (e.g. Sensitive or protected areas)?



√ No soil erosion will occur during the construction activities


√ Workers will be employed from the local community. No need for worker-based camps.





Involuntary resettlement of people (physical displacement and/or economic displacement)?





√ No construction base camps are needed for workers in this project.




√ Workers will be from the local community.





√ No hazardous materials will be used during construction or operations






√ Solid wastes will not be produced during operations. Mitigation actions will minimize the impact.



√ Wastewater will not be produced during operations. Mitigation action will minimize the impact.

Environmental Categorization Form – Installation of Clean Water Storage Tank and Pipeline


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Installation of Clean Water Storage Tank and Pipeline Location(s): Nanga Sangan, Pulau Majang, and Bungan Jaya Villages (Kapuas Districts)





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening - Installation of Clean Water Storage Tank and Pipeline

Locations: Nanga Sangan, Pulau Majang, and Bungan Jaya Villages (Kapuas Districts)






0 Hydrological parameters are not primary factors influencing the project design





0 Current weather conditions and likely future climate conditions will not affect the project scheduling and costs for maintenance activities



1 Weather/ climate conditions will affect the project performance during operations


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project. Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): Medium





Appendix 16 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist – Construction of Green School Building

Locations: Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District) and Tanjung Sari Village, Sintang DIstrict




Legally protected Area (core zone or buffer zone)

√ In the other usages area (APL)

Wetland √ In the Danau Sentarum National Park



Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In settlement area

B. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause the following?

Impairment of historical/cultural areas, disfiguration of landscape or potential loss/damage to physical cultural resources?


Disturbance to precious ecology (e.g. sensitive or protected areas)?



√ Activity will not be influenced by hydrology aspects


√ Workers will be from the local community. No need for worker-based camps.


√ The activity will not involve heavy equipment. It will not increase air pollution in permanently.



Involuntary resettlement of people? (physical displacement and/or economic displacement)





√ Construction camps are not required for the activity.


√ Breeding habitats will not be created during the activity


√ Workers are local contractors



√ Construction activities will be conducted by contractors. An increase in burden on social infrastructure and services is not anticipated.


√ No hazardous material will be used when constructed the unit


√ Hazardous materials will not be used in the activity


√ Operations and decommissioning will be supported and supervised by the contractor


√ Solid wastes will be produced during operations. However, mitigation actions will minimize the impact.

Use of chemicals? √ No chemical materials will be used when constructed the unit.


√ Wastewater will be produced during operations. However, mitigation actions will minimize the impact.

Environmental Categorization Form – Construction of Green School Building


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Construction of Green School Building Location(s): Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District) and Tanjung Sari Village





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening Checklist – Construction of Green School Building

Locations: Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District) and Tanjung Sari Village, Sintang DIstrict



Is siting and/or routing of the project (or its components) likely to be affected by climate conditions including extreme weather-related events such as floods, droughts, storms, landslides?

0 The project will not be affected by climate conditions including extreme weather


0 Hydrological parameters are not primary factors that will influence the project design



0 During construction activities, or operations, all climate conditions will not affect the project input


0 All current and likely future climate conditions will not affect the project maintenance


Would weather/climate conditions and related extreme events likely affect the performance (e.g. annual power production) of project output(s) (e.g. hydro-power generation facilities) throughout their design lifetime?

0 During operations, the performance of green school buildings will not be affected by any climate conditions


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2

Responses when added that provide a score of 0 will be considered low risk project. If adding all responses will result to a score of 1-4 and that no score of 2 was given to any single response, the project will be assigned a medium risk category. A total score of 5 or more (which include providing a score of 1 in all responses) or a 2 in any single response will be categorized as high risk project. Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): Low





Appendix 17 Rapid Environmental Assesment (REA) Checklist – Hydropower

Location: Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District) A. Basic Project Design Data

Dam height: None

Surface area of reservoir: None

Estimated number of people to be displaced: None

Rated power output: 20 kVA

B. Other Considerations:

Water storage type: Run of river without impoundment

River diversion scheme: Minimal for running the plant.

Type of power demand to address: Peak load


A. Project location Is the dam and/or project facilities adjacent to or within any of the following areas?

Unregulated river √ Sekapat river (natural flow).

Undammed river tributaries below the proposed dam

√ No dams have been built in this area.

Unique or aesthetically valuable land or water form

√ Sekapat waterfall.

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In the primary zone of Protected Forest

Protected area √ Primary zone of Protected Forest.

Buffer zone of protected area √ The location is in primary Zone of Protected Forest.

Primary forest √ In the primary zone of protected forest

Range of endangered or threatened animals √ There are no endangered or threatened animals surround the location

Area used by indigenous peoples √ Used for hunting and farming.

Cultural heritage site √ Only for protected forest

Wetland √ In mineral soils.

Mangrove √ No mangrove areas surrounding the location.

Estuary √ No estuary areas surrounding the location.

B. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause any of the following?

Short-term construction impacts such as soil erosion, deterioration of water and air quality, noise and vibration from construction equipment?

√ Only during construction activities, namely material distribution, assembling the parts, and maintenance.

Disturbance of large areas due to material quarrying?

√ There will be no large-scale material quarrying

Disposal of large quantities of construction spoils?

√ During construction activities.


Clearing of large forested area for ancillary facilities and access road?

√ No large-scale land clearing.

Impounding of a long river stretch? √ Stream diversion only.

Dryness (less than 50% of dry season mean flow) over a long downstream river stretch?

√ No significant changes in mean flow during dry season.

Construction of permanent access road near or through forests?

√ Inspection road will be constructed near the forest.

Creation of barriers for migratory land animals √ This activity will not create barriers for animal migration.

Loss of precious ecological values due to flooding of agricultural/forest areas, and wild lands and wildlife habitat; destruction of fish spawning/breeding and nursery grounds?

√ Predicted to eliminate valuable ecology.

Deterioration of downstream water quality due to anoxic water from the reservoir and sediments due to soil erosion?

√ During construction activities only.

Significant diversion of water from one basin to another?

√ The diversion will be the most practical way to improve the power of the turbine.

Alternating dry and wet downstream conditions due to peaking operation of powerhouse?

√ This activity will divert the flow of water towards the turbine.

Significant modification of annual flood cycle affecting downstream ecosystem, people’s sustenance and livelihoods?

√ Floods rarely occur in this area.

Loss or destruction of unique or aesthetically valuable land or water forms?

√ Diversion of the main flow is predicted to destroy valuable land and water forms.

Proliferation of aquatic weeds in reservoir and downstream impairing dam discharge, irrigation systems, navigation and fisheries, and increasing water loss through transpiration?

√ Reservoir maintenance will be carried out every 3 months.

Scouring of riverbed below dam? √ Water flow diverted to the dam will damage the riverbed.

Downstream erosion of recipient River in trans-basin diversion?

√ No soil erosion will occur for the recipient river.

Increased flooding risk of recipient river in trans-basin diversion?

√ Flooding risk will occur

Decreased groundwater recharge of downstream areas?

√ The PLTMH will be constructed in the diversion river to generate the turbine. However, after passing through the turbine it will flow back to the main river.

Draining of downstream wetlands and riparian areas?

√ The operation of the Micro Hydropower Plant will not drain areas downstream of wetlands.

Decline or change in fisheries below the dam due to reduced peak flows and floods, submersion of river stretches and resultant destruction of fish breeding and nursery grounds, and water quality changes?

√ Environmental flows will change during construction and operation activities, hence water quality will decrease due to the reverse flow from the turbine/s.

Loss of migratory fish species due to barrier imposed by the dam?

√ No fish population has been found during the screening activities. Therefore, It assumed that no fish migration activities will occur in this area.


Formation of sediment deposits at reservoir entrance, creating backwater effect and flooding and waterlogging upstream?

√ Sedimentation will occur during the operational stage. Therefore, Reservoir entrance will be carried out every 3 months.

Significant disruption of river sediment transport downstream due to trapping in reservoir?

√ The deposits of sediment will occur during the operational stage. Therefore, reservoir maintenance will be carried out every 3 months

Environmental risk due to potential toxicity of sediments trapped behind the dams?

√ There will be no toxicity in sediment deposits due to the activity surround the location that is protected forest.

Increased saltwater intrusion in estuary and low lands due to reduced river flows?

√ Not applicable at this stage.

Significant induced seismicity due to large reservoir size and potential environmental hazard from catastrophic failure of the dam?

√ This microhydro is only 40 KVA (small type) therefore, the catastrophic failure of the dam is unlikely to occur.

Cumulative effects due to its role as part of a cascade of dams/ reservoirs?

√ Cumulative effects are potential occur due to operational and maintenance activity.

Depletion of dissolved oxygen by large quantities of decaying plant material, fish mortality due to reduced dissolved oxygen content in water, algal blooms causing successive and temporary eutrophication, growth and proliferation of aquatic weeds?

√ Changes in environmental flows will significantly affect water quality.


√ Construction activities will not involve hazardous materials. However, during construction, the safety of the workers will embedded into OHS from the contractors


√ The site of micro hydro within the protected forest, and far away from village location. Therefore, will not increase a burden on social infrastructure and services.

Creation of community slums following construction of the hydropower plant and its facilities?

√ No slums community will be create during the construction due to the location within the protected forest.


√ The workers will come from local community.

Uncontrolled human migration into the area, made possible by access roads and transmission lines?

√ Human migration will not occur into this location due to the difficulties of the access and the position of the micro hydro that within the protected area.

Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women, children or other vulnerable groups?

√ This project will fulfill all the local community needs including the poor, woman, children and other vulnerable group.

Community health and safety risks due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials likely to create physical, chemical and biological hazards?

√ No chemical and biological hazard will emerged during the distribution or storage of the material

Risks to community safety due to both accidental and natural hazards, especially where the structural elements or components of the project (e.g., dams) are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning?

√ The distance between the micro hydro and the nearest village (affected community) is only 4 Km by foot. Therefore, the accidental for access the dams by the member of the local community will occur during the operation and the decommissioning the unit.

Environmental Categorization Form – Hydropower


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Micro-hydropower Plant Location(s): Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang Districts)

C. Environment Category (according to ADB category and Indonesian Government regulation) The subproject is category B according to ADB categorization, and UKL-UPL is accepted for

this category. UKL-UPL recommendation is required for the subproject according to the requirements of



Preliminary Climate Risk Screening Checklist Hydropower Location: Kayu Dujung Village (Sintang District)



Is siting and/or routing of the project (or its components) likely to be affected by climate conditions including extreme weather-related events such as floods, droughts, storms, landslides?

1 The topography condition of the project area is about 25 – 40% of slope. It has significant impact to emerge the landslides. However, the unit lies within the protected forest and surround by the dense vegetation. Therefore, the climate condition will not be affected.


2 This project is very dependent on water flow and hydrological conditions. hydrometeorological parameters are very important to consider.



1 Maintenance and materials in this project are likely affected by climate conditions. However, time schedule and monitoring activities are needed to minimize the impact during the construction and operational activities.


1 The turbine works properly if the surface of river achieved on optimum level. However, the unit lies within the protected forest and surround by the dense vegetation. Therefore, Maintenance activities and project output are likely affected by current and future climate condition.



2 The turbine works properly if the surface of river achieved on optimum level. Therefore, hydro-meterological parameters are affected significantly.


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2


Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): High risk


Prepared by: PISU environmental safeguard specialist

Appendix 18 Rapid Environmental Assesment (REA) Checklist for Hydropower

Location: Tanjung Lokang Village (Kapuas Hulu District) A. Basic Project Design Data

Dam height: None

Surface area of reservoir: None

Estimated number of people to be displaced: None

Rated power output: 20 kVA

B. Other Considerations:

Water storage type: Run of river without impoundment

River diversion scheme: Minimal for running the plant.

Type of power demand to address: Peak load


B. Project location Is the dam and/or project facilities adjacent to or within any of the following areas?

Unregulated river √ Som and Rodjang river (natural flow).

Undammed river tributaries below the proposed dam

√ No dams have been built in this area.

Unique or aesthetically valuable land or water form

√ No aesthetically land or water form in this area.

Special area for protecting biodiversity √ In the primary zone of Protected Forest

Protected area √ Primary zone of Protected Forest.

Buffer zone of protected area √ The location is in primary Zone of Protected Forest.

Primary forest √ In the primary zone of protected forest

Range of endangered or threatened animals √ There are no endangered or threatened animals surround the location.

Area used by indigenous peoples √ Used for hunting and farming.

Cultural heritage site √ Only for protected forest

Wetland √ In mineral soils.

Mangrove √ No mangrove areas surrounding the location.

Estuary √ No estuary areas surrounding the location.

C. Potential Environmental Impacts Will the project cause any of the following?

Short-term construction impacts such as soil erosion, deterioration of water and air quality, noise and vibration from construction equipment?

√ Only during construction activities, namely material distribution, assembling the parts, and maintenance.

Disturbance of large areas due to material quarrying?

√ There will be no large-scale material quarrying

Disposal of large quantities of construction spoils?

√ During construction activities.

Clearing of large forested area for ancillary √ No large-scale land clearing.


facilities and access road?

Impounding of a long river stretch? √ Stream diversion only.

Dryness (less than 50% of dry season mean flow) over a long downstream river stretch?

√ No significant changes in mean flow during dry season.

Construction of permanent access road near or through forests?

√ Inspection road will be constructed near the forest.

Creation of barriers for migratory land animals √ This activity will not create barriers for animal migration.

Loss of precious ecological values due to flooding of agricultural/forest areas, and wild lands and wildlife habitat; destruction of fish spawning/breeding and nursery grounds?

√ Predicted to eliminate valuable ecology.

Deterioration of downstream water quality due to anoxic water from the reservoir and sediments due to soil erosion?

√ During construction activities only.

Significant diversion of water from one basin to another?

√ The diversion will be the most practical way to improve the power of the turbine.

Alternating dry and wet downstream conditions due to peaking operation of powerhouse?

√ This activity will divert the flow of water towards the turbine.

Significant modification of annual flood cycle affecting downstream ecosystem, people’s sustenance and livelihoods?

√ Floods rarely occur in this area.

Loss or destruction of unique or aesthetically valuable land or water forms?

√ Diversion of the main flow is predicted to destroy valuable land and water forms.

Proliferation of aquatic weeds in reservoir and downstream impairing dam discharge, irrigation systems, navigation and fisheries, and increasing water loss through transpiration?

√ Reservoir maintenance will be carried out every 3 months.

Scouring of riverbed below dam? √ Water flow diverted to the dam will damage the riverbed.

Downstream erosion of recipient River in trans-basin diversion?

√ No soil erosion will occur for the recipient river.

Increased flooding risk of recipient river in trans-basin diversion?

√ Flooding risk will occur

Decreased groundwater recharge of downstream areas?

√ The PLTMH will be constructed in the diversion river to generate the turbine. However, after passing through the turbine it will flow back to the main river.

Draining of downstream wetlands and riparian areas?

√ The operation of the Micro Hydropower Plant will not drain areas downstream of wetlands.

Decline or change in fisheries below the dam due to reduced peak flows and floods, submersion of river stretches and resultant destruction of fish breeding and nursery grounds, and water quality changes?

√ Environmental flows will change during construction and operation activities, hence water quality will decrease due to the reverse flow from the turbine/s.

Loss of migratory fish species due to barrier imposed by the dam?

√ No fish population has been found during the screening activities. Therefore, It assumed that no fish migration activities will occur in this area.

Formation of sediment deposits at reservoir entrance, creating backwater effect and flooding and waterlogging upstream?

√ Sedimentation will occur during the operational stage. Therefore, Reservoir entrance will be carried out every 3 months.


Significant disruption of river sediment transport downstream due to trapping in reservoir?

√ The deposits of sediment will occur during the operational stage. Therefore, reservoir maintenance will be carried out every 3 months

Environmental risk due to potential toxicity of sediments trapped behind the dams?

√ There will be no toxicity in sediment deposits due to the activity surround the location that is protected forest.

Increased saltwater intrusion in estuary and low lands due to reduced river flows?

√ Not applicable at this stage.

Significant induced seismicity due to large reservoir size and potential environmental hazard from catastrophic failure of the dam?

√ This microhydro is only 40 KVA (small type) therefore, the catastrophic failure of the dam is unlikely to occur.

Cumulative effects due to its role as part of a cascade of dams/ reservoirs?

√ Cumulative effects are potential occur due to operational and maintenance activity.

Depletion of dissolved oxygen by large quantities of decaying plant material, fish mortality due to reduced dissolved oxygen content in water, algal blooms causing successive and temporary eutrophication, growth and proliferation of aquatic weeds?

√ Changes in environmental flows will significantly affect water quality.


√ Construction activities will not involve hazardous materials. However, during construction, the safety of the workers will embedded into OHS from the contractors


√ The site of micro hydro within the protected forest, and far away from village location. Therefore, will not increase a burden on social infrastructure and services.

Creation of community slums following construction of the hydropower plant and its facilities?

√ No slums community will be create during the construction due to the location within the protected forest.


√ The workers will come from local community.

Uncontrolled human migration into the area, made possible by access roads and transmission lines?

√ Human migration will not occur into this location due to the difficulties of the access and the position of the micro hydro that within the protected area.

Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women, children or other vulnerable groups?

√ This project will fulfill all the local community needs including the poor, woman, children and other vulnerable group.

Community health and safety risks due to the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of materials likely to create physical, chemical and biological hazards?

√ No chemical and biological hazard will emerged during the distribution or storage of the material

Risks to community safety due to both accidental and natural hazards, especially where the structural elements or components of the project (e.g., dams) are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning?

√ The distance between the micro hydro and the nearest village (affected community) is only 4 Km by foot. Therefore, the accidental for access the dams by the member of the local community will occur during the operation and the decommissioning the unit.

Environmental Categorization Form – Hydropower


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Micro-hydropower Plant Location(s): Tanjung Lokang Village (Kapuas Hulu Districts)





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening – Hydropower Location: Tanjung Lokang Village




1 The topography condition of the project area is about 25 – 40% of slope. It has significant impact to emerge the landslides. However, the unit lies within the protected forest and surround by the dense vegetation. Therefore, the climate condition will affected in minimum level


2 This project is very dependent on water flow and hydrological conditions. Hydrometeorological parameters are very important to consider .



1 Maintenance and materials in this project are likely affected by climate conditions. However, time schedule and monitoring activities are needed to minimize the impact during the construction and operational activities.


1 The turbine works properly if the surface of river achieved on optimum level. However, the unit lies within the protected forest and surround by the dense vegetation. Therefore, Maintenance activities and project output are likely affected by current and future climate condition.



2 The turbine works properly if the surface of river achieved on optimum level. Therefore, hydro-meterological parameters are affected significantly.


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2


Result of Initial Screening (Low, Medium, High): High risk


Prepared by: PISU environmental specialist

Appendix 19 Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist – Revitalization of Ecoturism Facilities

Location: Sepandan Island (Kapuas Hulu District)


A. Project SitingIs the Project area adjacent to or within any of the following environmentally sensitive areas?

Cultural heritage site √ In the resort of BBTNBKDS

Legally protected Area (core zone or bufferzone)

√ In the utilization zone of a National Park

Wetland √ In Danau Sentarum Ecoregion

Mangrove √ There are no mangrove plants surrounding the location


Special area for protecting biodiversity √ Special area for tourism

B. Potential Environmental ImpactsWill the project cause any of the following?

Impairment of historical/cultural areas,disfiguration of landscape or potentialloss/damage to physical cultural resources?


Disturbance to precious ecology (e.g. sensitiveor protected areas)?

√ The project is located in the Utilization Zone of a National park

Alteration of surface water hydrology ofwaterways resulting in increased sediment instreams affected by increased soil erosion atconstruction site?

√ No soil erosion will occur during construction activities

Deterioration of surface water quality due to siltrunoff and sanitary wastes from worker-basedcamps and chemicals used in construction?

√ Workers will be from local community. No need for worker-based camps

Increased air pollution due to projectconstruction and operation?


Noise and vibration due to project constructionor operation?


Involuntary resettlement of people? (physicaldisplacement and/or economic displacement)?


Disproportionate impacts on the poor, womenand children, Indigenous Peoples or othervulnerable groups?

√ The activity will lead to economic improvement for the local community, particularly for woman and children.

Poor sanitation and solid waste disposal inconstruction camps and worksites, and possibletransmission of communicable diseases (suchas STI's and HIV/AIDS) from workers to localpopulations?

√ No construction base camps required for workers in this project.

Creation of temporary breeding habitats fordiseases such as those transmitted bymosquitoes and rodents?


Social conflicts if workers from other regions orcountries are hired?

√ Workers will be from local community





√ No hazardous materials will be used during construction and operation



Community safety risks due to both accidental and natural causes, where the structural elements or components of the project are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning?



√ Solid wastes will be produced during operational activities. However, the mitigation action such toilet and solid waste recycle system has been provided.



√ Wastewater will be produced during construction or operations. However, the mitigation action such toilet and solid waste recycle system has been provided.

Environmental Categorization Form – Revitalization of Ecotourism Facilities


B. Project Data

Country/Project Title: Indonesia/FIP-1 Subprojects: Revitalization of Ecotourism Facilities Location(s): Sepandan Island (Kapuas Hulu District)





Preliminary Climate Risk Screening – Revitalization of Ecotourism Facility Location: Pulau Sepandan, BBTNDSBK (Kapuas Hulu District)

Screening Questions Score Remarks20





1 Hydrological parameters are not primary factors influencing the project design.





0 Current weather conditions and likely future climate conditions will not affect the project scheduling and costs for maintenance activities.



0 During the operations, weather/ climate conditions will affect the project performance.


Response Score

Not Likely 0

Likely 1

Very Likely 2




Prepared by: PISU environmental specialits

Note: If possible, provide details on the sensitivity of project components to climate conditions, such as how


Appendix 20 Meaningful Consultation on Agroforestry in Batulintang, Uluk Palin and Tanjung Villages (May 2019)

Sungai Utik sub village, Batulintang Village, Sintang District on 15 May 2019

Uluk Palin Village, Kapuas Hulu District on 19 May 2019

Pulan sub village, Batulintang Village, Sintang District on 19 May 2019

Tanjung Village on 20 May 2019

Appendix 21 GRM and Conflict Resolution Workshop, Kapuas Hulu District (27 June 2019)

Appendix 22 Appointment Letter of Safeguard and GRM Focal Points

Appendix 23 The Inspection of Implementation Agency in Uluk Palin Village, Kapuas Hulu District (April 2019)

Appendix 24 Minutes of Meeeting - BPHP and PISU Coordination Meeting, Pontianak (April 2019)

Appendix 25 Key notes meeting between PISU and BBTNBKDS, Puttusibau (May 2019)

Appendix 26 FMU Kapuas Hulu Utara and PISU Survey of Agroforestry Site, Batulintang Village (April 2019)

Appendix 27 Safeguard Dissemination in Sintang and Pontianak (May 2019)

Appendix 28 Attendance List of Safeguard Dissemination in Sintang and Pontianak (May 2019)

Appendix 29 GRM Procedure

Affected Person (AP)/

Affected Household (AH)Step (1)

Complaint Registration (Fill in Complaint Form)

Verification (Complaint Material/content)

GPP (Site Level)Step (2)

Court

Discuss in Village Level (7 Days)

(Step 3)

Discuss in Sub-District Level (14 Days)

(Step 4)

Discuss in District Level (14 Days)

(Step 5)

Complaint has Solved and mitigation has

implemented

Valid

Discuss in Provincial Level (22 Days)

(Step 6)

AP = Affected Person, AH = Affected Household, GPP = Grievance Point Person

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No Solution Reached

No Solution Reached

No Solution Reached

Discuss in MoEF Government Of Indonesia

(22 Days)(Step 7)

Yes

No Solution Reached

No Solution Reached

Appendix 30 GRM Complaint Form

Complainant

Grievance Point Person (GPP)

---------------------------------

--------------------------------------------

Dates:

Notes:

Complaints noted were complaints about the implementation of the FIP-1 project and those involving affected people (AP) / affected household (AH) / affected community (AC).

Complainant Grievance Point Person (GPP)

Name Name

Address Complaint Date

Delivery Method (√) Email Phone/Hp

Gender (√) Male Female Electronic Message (sms/wa)

Letter

Job Interview

Verbal Others

Phone/HP Additional Document Photo/records/Evidence/Witness, dll

Complaint Group: (√) Complaint Explanation

1 Environment

2 Social

3 Land Tenurial

4 Others

Appendix 31 Monitoring for 42.5-ha Agroforestry in Radin Jaya Village

No Monitoring Implemented Evidence/Disclosure

31-1 Certified pesticide (Round-UP 486 SL) that used in agroforestry 42,5 ha in Radin Jaya village.

31-2 Certified organic fertilized that used in agroforestry 42,5 ha in Radin Jaya, SIntang District

31-3 Certified Chemical fertilized (NPK) with SNI 2803:2010 that used in agroforestry 42,5 ha in Radin Jaya, SIntang District.

No Monitoring Implemented Evidence/Disclosure

31-4 By visual observation, no indication of soil erosion on selected area of agroforestry in Km 10 Sub Village, Radin Jaya, 2019

31-5 Limited clearing manually around the planting holes

31-6 Plant growth condition on selected location of groforestry in Mengerat Sub Village, Radin Jaya Village, Sintang DIstrict

Appendix 32 Monitoring for Ecotourism Facilities, Sepadan Island (June 2019)

No Monitoring Impemented Evidence/Disclosure

32-1

Selected location for guesthouse in Sepadan

32-2 Garbage bins provided along footpath

in Sepadan

32-3 Bio-digester has installed for

guesthouse in Sepadan

32-4 The existence of signboard within Ecotourism location in Sepadan

Appendix 33 BUPSHA Invitation for Preparation of FIP-1 Activity in 2019

Appendix 34 Minutes summary of meeting regarding SIS REDD+ in September 2019

Appendix 35 Septic Tank design of a green school in Vega Village (Kapuas Hulu District)