37
Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel As Fuel In CI Engines Gautam Kumar Supervisor : Prof. Anoop Kumar National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur

Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel As Fuel In CI Engines

Gautam Kumar

Supervisor : Prof. Anoop Kumar

National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur

Page 2: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Outline

1. Literature Review

2. Discussion/ Gap

3. Proposed Work Plan/ Problem Formulation

4. References

Page 3: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Flow chart of biodiesel Alcohal + Catalyst

(Methyl Alcohal) (NaOCH3)

Heating and stirring in Reactor

65-70o C

Vegetable oil

Transesterification Glycerol

Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4)

Vegetable Oil

Methyl Ester

Washing (Distillation Water and Blown air)

Drying

Page 4: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Non Edible Vegetable Oils Available in India

There are some non-edible vegetable oil in India those production is sufficient amount.

Jatropha oil 15000 tonsKaranja oil 55000 tonsMahua oil 180000 tons Rice bran oil 474000 tonsNeem oil 100000 tonsKusum oil 25000 tonsSal 180000 tons

Page 5: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

1 2009/India GVNSR Ratnakara Rao

Single cylinder, 4 stroke, variable compression ratio C.I.engine (13.2 to 20.2), Max. Power 3.75KW

Mahua Oil and its blend with diesel

VCR (13.2, 13.9, 14.8, 15.7, 16.9, 18.1, 20.2)

1. Highest BTE 27.98% with CR of 15.7 at peak load.

2. Min. 16.24% (13.2).3. EGT 4050C.4. BSFC is found to be 1.32 kg/hr.5. Smoke density is also low

(15.7)

Page 6: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

2 2008 Kapilan N. NADAR

1 cylinder, Water cooled engine,Max. BHP 7 at 1500 rpmInjection timing 27 deg bTDC

Mahua oil methyl ester

1. Engine runs smoothly with the pilot fuel quantity of 5 and 6.11 mg per cycle and at the injector opening pressure of 200 bar.

2. Knocking was observed at the pilot fuel quantity of 7.22 mg per cycle, for all the injector pressure.

3. The combination of pilot fuel quantity of 5 mg per cycle and the injection opening pressure of 200 bar results in higher brake thermal efficiency and lower CO, HC emission. But this combination results in higher NOx emission.

Page 7: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

3 2009/India S.Jindal 1 Cylinder, water cooled, 4 stroke, VCR diesel engine.Speed -1600 rpm VCR (16, 17, & 18)IP (150, 200 & 250) bar

Jatropha methyl ester

The highest engine performance BSFC-10% reductionBTHE -8.9% (when CR-18 & IP 250 bar).increase compared to dieselIn emission aspectHC & Exhaust temp. Increase when CR is increase.But CO & Smoke decrease.NOx (165 ppm) are unaffected due to high IP.

Page 8: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

4 2009/India Y.V.Hanumantha Rao

1 cylinder, water cooled, DI diesel engine, 4 stroke5-BHP, 3.68 capacitySpeed -1500 rpm

Jatropha methyl ester and blends with diesel

1. Brake thermal efficiencies of engine operating with biodiesel mode were 22.2, 30.6 and 37.5 percent at 2, 2.5 and 3.5 kw load conditions.

2. At 3.5 kw load cond. Exhaust gas tem. is 19% higher.

3. CO2 increased with increase of load.

4. CO is min. at 1.5kw load (610mg/kg) & max. 3.5 kw (898mg/kg).

5. NOx is slightly increase in jatropha methyl ester and its blends.

Page 9: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

5 2008/India Purnanand V Bhale

Cylinder liner, piston ring, friction coefficient, friction force, wear, pin on disc,

Jatropha oil methyl ester and diesel

1. Coefficient of friction for biodiesel blending is almost 63% lower than that for diesel blending.

2. The value of wear (µm) for biodiesel is 55% lower than that of diesel under similar operating conditions.

Page 10: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

5 2008/India Purnanand V Bhale

Cylinder liner, piston ring, friction coefficient, friction force, wear, pin on disc,

Jatropha oil methyl ester and diesel

1. Coefficient of friction for biodiesel blending is almost 63% lower than that for diesel blending.

2. The value of wear (µm) for biodiesel is 55% lower than that of diesel under similar operating conditions.

Page 11: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

6 2008/Korea Chang Sik Lee 1-cylinder, DI diesel engine,IP-50, 100 (MPa)Engine speed-1000, 1500, 2000 (rpm)

Soybean methyl ester

1. Injection rate-biodiesel fuel showed slightly shorter injection delay and higher max injection rate by 2.79% compared to those obtained by diesel fuel.

2. Lowest NOx was found at 2000 rpm.

3. HC & CO emission was found lower at all speed.

4. Effect of EGR.

Page 12: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

7 2008/USA V. Nagaraju and N.Henein

HSDI diesel engine1500 rpm engine speedVariable injection pressure.

Soybean methyl ester (20) and ULS diesel

1. Max. rate of heat release for B-20 was 8% higher than that of B-00.

2. Exhaust gas temperature is higher for B-20 than B-00.

3. Indicated specific fuel consumption was higher with the B-20 as compared to B-00.

4. B-20 decrease NOx by 4%.5. B-20 decrease HC by 9%,

smoke by 10% and CO by 3%.

Page 13: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

8. 2004/India H. Raheman Single cylinder, 4-stroke, DI, water cooled diesel engine,Rated output-7.5 kw at 3000 rpm.CR-16.1

Karanja methyl ester and diesel

1. The torques produced in case of B-20 and B-40 is 0.1-1.13% which is higher than diesel. And B-60 and B-80 is 4-23% reduce that mean it is lower than diesel.

2. BSFC in case of B-20 and B-40 was 0.8-7.4% which is lower than diesel. But on B60 and B100 the BSFC was higher that is 11-48% higher.

3. Max BTE was obtained to be 26.79 % on B20 (24.62% for diesel).

4. CO, Smoke density and NOx was reduced by 80%, 50% and 26% upto B40 blends with diesel.

Page 14: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

9. 2009/India M. Pandian 4-stroke twin cylinder DI water cooled CI engine, Rated speed-1500 rev/min.

Pongamia biodiesel (B40) and diesel.

1. The BSEC increased by 3.11% on advancing the injection timing to 300 CA bTDC and on using 180 CA it will reduced by 6.27%.

2. On advancing the injection timing say 300 CA bTDC the BTE increased by 5.07% and it will decrease by 3.08% on 180 CA bTDC.

3. The CO and HC emissions were reduced by 32% and 14.44% respectively when advancing the injection time to 300 CA bTDC

4. NOx is reduced by 35% on advancing the injection timing 300 CA bTDC.

Page 15: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

10. 2006/India Deepak Agarwal

A two cylinder, air-cooled, constant speed-1500 rpm Direct injection diesel engine.Rated power- 9kwInjection pressure-210 bar

Rice bran oil methyl ester and diesel

1. A 20% biodiesel blend with 15% EGR is found to be optimum concentration for biodiesel, which improves the thermal efficiency, reduces the exhaust emissions and the BSEC.

Page 16: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

S.N Year/Country Author Setup Results

11 2006/India K.C. Velappan Single cylinder, 4 stroke, water cooled, rated power-3.7kw at 1500 rpmInjection pressure-240 barFuel injection timing-24 BTDC

Rice bran oil methyl ester and diesel

1. RBOBD showed 15% increase in SFC.

2. 25% increase in BTE.3. 60% reduction in HC.4. More than 75% reduction in

CO.5. Minimum of 10%reduction in

NOx.6. 30% sound reduction.7. The particle size in the smoke

of RBOBD is less than 0.5 µm.

Page 17: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Properties Mahua oil methyl ester

Karanja methyl ester

Jatropha curcas biodiesel

Sunflower oil methyl ester

Rapeseed oil methyl ester

Cotton oil methyl ester

Soybean oil methyl ester

Palm oil methyl ester

Polang-a oil methyl ester

Rubber seed oil methyl ester

Tallow methyl ester

Babass-u oil methyl ester

Linseed oil methyl ester

Diesel

Density 150C 880 885 881 882 917 885 878.7

Viscosity (mm2/s) at 400C

5.2 9.60 4.80 4.693 4.5 4.0 4.08 0.5 4.92 5.81 4.908 3.6 2.83 2.85

Calorific value (MJ/Kg)

36.9 36.12 39.23 37.20 37 40.32 39.76 39.07 38.66 36.50 17.144 31.8 40.84 42.50

Flash point (0C)

127 187 135 191 170 70 69 229 140 130 113 127 415 85

Cloud point (0C)

5 -2 -11 to 16

1 -4 -2 9 13.2 4 19 4 1

Pour point (0C)

6 -6 2 -3 -12 -15 -3 4 4.3 -8 16 -5 -9

Cetane number

51 48 46-70 49 54.7 46 45 62 43 58 63 56.10

Acid value mg KOH/g

0.5 0.10 0.20 0.27 0.15 0.24 0.118 0.32 0.03

Carbon residue %

0.20 0.4 0.20 0.98 >0.3 0.18 0.8 1.83 0.4222 0.17

Sulphur,ppm %

0.02 0.004 0.003 0.0096 0.03 0.02 0.003 0.05

Specific gravity

0.865 0.876 0.878 0.882 0.874 0.885 0.877 0.874 0.870 0.883

Iodine value 94 125.5 97.4 123 35-61 35-48 10-18 Ash content (%)

0.01 0.02 0.012 0.0014 0.015 0.063 0.063 0.03 0.001 0.034 0.156

Physico-chemical properties of various Biodiesel fuel

Page 18: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Discussion on Literature review

1. BTE, BSFC, Brake power and emission for various load has been estimated for various biodiesel.

2. Effect of CR on various parameters such as BTE, BSFC, EGT and emissions has been studied for different type of biodiesel.

3. Effect of injection timing on various parameters such as BTE, BSFC, EGT and emissions studied for different type of biodiesel.

4. Effect of injection pressure on various parameters such as BTE, BSFC, EGT and emissions studied for different type of biodiesel.

5. Effect of preheating on various parameters such as BTE, BSFC, EGT and emissions studied for different type of biodiesel.

Page 19: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

GAP

1. There is no such studies conducted in which more than three parameters have been studies.

2. No such thermal model is available which helps in to run biodiesel system (CI engine) runs efficiently.

3. There is no such relation available by which the performance of the biodiesel system should be optimized.

Page 20: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Research Plan

1. Literature review2. Experimentation using selected four oil, these are (a). Jatropha oil (b). Mahua oil (c). Karanja oil (d). Rice bran oil3. To study the effect of following parameters on the output a) Injection Pressure b) Injection Timing c) CR d) Load e) Speed f) Quantity of fuel injected

Page 21: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

4. Based upon experimentation a co-relation will

be developed to identify BTE, BSFC, EGT and emissions for the above given input parameters.

5. Validation of results with the help of software/Previous literatures.

Page 22: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

1000 1500 2000 2500 30000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4x 10

-5

Engine Speed,rpm

Ma

ss F

low

Ra

te,k

g/s

Figure 1: Mass Flow Rate vs Speed at 3.68kW load

CDFJatro

Page 23: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 30000

1

2

x 10-4

Engine Speed,rpm

Spec

ific F

uel C

onsu

mptio

n,kg/k

J.h

Figure 2: Specific Fuel Consumption vs Speed at 3.68kW load

CDFJatro

Page 24: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

1000 1500 2000 2500 30000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Engine Speed,rpm

Effi

cie

ncy

,%Figure 3:Efficiency vs Speed at 3.8kW load

CDFJatro

Page 25: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Engine Speed,rpm

To

rqu

e,N

mFigure 4: Torque vs Speed at 3.68kW load

CDFJatro

Page 26: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

-100 -50 0 50 100-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6x 10

6

Crank angle (degrees)

dP

/dO

(P

a/r

ad

)

Graph derivative pressure vs crank angle

CDF

Page 27: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

-100 -50 0 50 100-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Crank angle(degrees)

dQ

n/d

O (

Pa

/ra

d)

Graph derivative heat net vs crank angle

CDF

Page 28: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

References

1.Gerpen JV. Comparison of the engine performance and emission characteristics of vegetable oil-based and animal fat-based Biodiesel. Iowa State University. Aug 8, 1996.

2. Peterson CL, Reece DL, Thompson JC, Beck SM, Chase C. Ethyl ester of rapeseed used as a biodiesel

fuel-a case study. Biomass and Bioenergy 1996 (331-336). 3. Trukarnpruk W,Porntangjitlikit S. Palm oil biodiesel blend on elastomer properties. Renewable Energy.

doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.08.003.

4. Sergio C. Capareda, Powell J, Parnell C, Engine performance and exhaust emissions of cottonseed oil biodiesel. 2008 beltwide cotton conferences, Nashville, Tennessee,January 8-11,2008.

5.Boeille N. Assessment of bus exhaust emission from tallow methyl ester biodiesel blends. Energy and fuels Research Unit, Department of mechanical engineering , The university of Auckland.

6.Deshmukh SJ, Bhuyar LB, Thakre SB, Ingole SS. Mathematical correlation for brake thermal efficiency and NOx emission of CI engine using ester of vegetables. International journal of mechanical, industrial and aerospace engineering 3:3 2009.

Page 29: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

7. Kaul S, Saxena RC, Kumar A, Negi MS, oilsBhatnagar AK, Goyal HB, Gupta AK. Corrosion behavior of biodiesel from seed Oils of Indian origin on diesel engine parts. Fuel Processing technology 2007;88:303-307.

8. Srivastava A, Prasad R. Triglycerides-based diesel fuels, Renewable and sustainable Energy reviews 2004;4:111-133.

9.Physical and Chemical properties of the fuel samples used in speed of sound and density measurements.

10.Ramadhas AS, Muraleedharan C, Jayaraj S. Biodiesel production from high FFA Rubber seed oil. Fuel 2005;84:335-340.

11. Sahoo PK, Das LM, Basu MKG, Naik SN. Biodiesel development from high acid value Polanga seed oil and performance in a CI engine, Fuel 2007;86:448-454.

12. Viswanathan B, Ramaswamy AV. Selection of solid heterogeneous catalysts for transesterification reaction.

13. Kumar PR, RajaGopal K, Prakash RH, Prasad BD. Performance of C.I. engine using blends of methyl esters of Palm oil with diesel, Medwell journal 2008;3:217-220.

Page 30: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

14.Demirbas A. Relationships derived from physical properties of vegetable oil and Biodiesel fuels, Fuel.doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.08.007.

15. Tsolakis A. Megaritis A. Exhaust gas assisted reforming of rapeseed methyl ester for reduced exhaust emissions of CI engines. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004;27:493-505.

16. Rashid U, Anwar F. Production of biodiesel through optimized alkaline-catalyzed transesterification of rapeseed oil, Fuel 2007. doi:1016/j.fuel.2007.05.003

17. Ramadhas AS, Muraleedharan C, Jayaraj S. Performance and emission evalution of a diesel engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil, Renewable Energy 2005;30:1789-1800.

18.Graboski MS, McCormick RL. Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines, Prog. Energy combust.sci.1998; Vol 24.pp 125-164.

19. kalligeros S, Zannikos F, Stournas S, Lois E,Anastopoulos G, Teas C, Sakellaropoulos F. An investigation of using biodiesel/marine diesel blends on the performance of a stationary diesel engines. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003;24:141-149.

Page 31: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

20. Barnwal BK, Sharma MP. Prospects of biodiesel production from vegetable oils in India,Renewable and Sustainable energy Reviews 2005;9:363-378.

21. Ghai S. Das LM. Emissions and performance study with sunflower methyl ester as diesel engine fuel. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2008; Vol 3.

22.Sarin R. Sharma M, Sinharay S, Malhotra RK. Jatropha-palm biodiesel blends: An optimum mix for Asia. Fuel 2007;86:1365-1371.

23. Tiwari AK, Kumar A, Raheman H. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil (jatropha curcus) with high free fatty acid: An optimized process, Biomass and Bioenergy.2007:31:569-575.

24. Srivastava PK, Verma M. Methyl ester of karanja oil as an alternative renewable source energy,Fuel 2007.doi:10,1016/j.fuel.2007.08.018.

25. Raheman H,Phadatare AG. Diesel engine emissions and performance from blends of karanja methyl ester and diesel,Biomass and Bioenergy 2004;27:393-397.

Page 32: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

26. Puhan Sukumar, Vedaraman N, Ram Boppana VB, Sankarnarayanan, Jeychandran K. Muhua oil (Madhuca Indica Seed oil) methyl ester as biodiesel-preparation and emission characteristics, Biomass and Bioenergy 2005;28:87-93.

27. Roberto G. Pereira, Cesar D. Oliveira, Jorge L. Oliveira, Paulo Cesar P. Oliveira, Carlos E. Fellows, Oscar E. Piamb. Exhaust emissions and electric energy generation in a stationary engine using blends of diesel and soybean biodiesel. Renewable Energy 2007;32:2453–60.

28. H. Raheman , S.V. Ghadge. Performance of compression ignition engine with mahua (Madhuca indica) biodiesel. Fuel 2007;86:2568–2573

29. Pramanik K. Properties and use of jatropha curcas oil and diesel fuel blends in compression ignition engine. Renewable Energy 2003;28:239–48.

30. Deepak Agarwal, Lokesh Kumar, Avinash Kumar Agarwal, Performance evaluation of a vegetable oil fuelled compression ignition engine, Renewable Energy. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.06.017.

Page 33: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

31.Avinash Kumar Agarwal, K. Rajamanoharan. Experimental investigations of performance and emissions of Karanja oil and its blends in a single cylinder agricultural diesel engine. Applied Energy, 2009;86:106-12.

32.Kondilia EM, Kaldellis JK. Biofuel implementation in East Europe: Current status and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11: 2137–51.

33. Marchetti JM, Miguel VU, Errazu AF. Possible methods for biodiesel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11:1300–11

34. Meher LC, Vidya Sagar D, Naik SN. Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2006; 10:248–68.

35. Padma Vasudevan, Satyawati Sharma and Ashwani Kumar, Liquid fuel from Biomass: An overview. Jouranal of scientific and industrial research, 2005;64: 822 –31.

36. B. Amigun R. Sigamoney, H. von Blottnitz. Commercialisation of biofuel industry in Africa: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008;12:690–711.

Page 34: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

37.Y.C., Singh, B., Development of biodiesel: Current scenario. Renew Sustain Energy Rev (2008), doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.009

38. Abdul Monyem, Jon H, Van Gerpen. The effect of biodiesel oxidation on engine performance and emissions. Biomass and Bioenergy 2001;20:317–25

39. L. Kallivroussis; A. Natsis; G. Papadakis. The energy balance of sunflower production for biodiesel in Greece. Biosystems Engineering 2002; 81 (3):347–54.

40. Calliope Panoutsou, Irene Namatov, Vassilis Lychnaras, Anastasia Nikolaou. Biodiesel options in Greece. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008; 32: 473 – 81.

41. M. Farzaneh, J. Zietsman, D. Perkinson, and D. Spillane. The Impact of Biodiesel on Emissions from School Buses. Transportation Land Use Planning, and Air Quality Congress 2007; 395-407.

42. Mandal R and Praveen Mithra, The Indian biofuel program : the national mission on biodiesel. Biofuels towards a greener and secure future, Editor P P Bhojvaid, teri publication

Page 35: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

43.Ayhan Demirbas. Biodiesel production from vegetable oil by supercritical methanol. Jouranal of scientific and industrial research 2005;64:858-65.

44. Senthikumar G. and Gunasekaran P. Bioethnol production fromcellulosic substance: Engineered bacteria and process integration challenge. Jouranal of scientific and industrial research 2005;64:845 – 53.

45. Raja A., Sarvanan B, Sitharthaseelan J., Sudhkar S., Sarvanan GS. Fumigation of methanol in diesel engine through recovering waste heat from exhaust gas with fuel additives IE(I) journal 2003;83:153 – 57.

46. Sheehan J, Combreco V, Duffield J, Garboski M, Shapouri H. An overview of biodiesel and petroleum diesel life cycle, A report by US department of Agriculture and Energy.

47. Kondilia EM, Kaldellis JK. Biofuel implementation in East Europe: Current status and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11: 2137–51.

48. Marchetti JM, Miguel VU, Errazu AF. Possible methods for biodiesel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11:1300–11

Page 36: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

49. Mats Galbe, Gunnar Liden, and Guuido Zacchi. Production of ethanol from biomass – Research in Sweden. J Sci Ind Res, 2005;64:905 –19

50. Stephen His. Biofuels in Europe, J Sci Ind Res. 2005;64:931–35

51. Abdul Monyem, Jon H, Van Gerpen. The effect of biodiesel oxidation on engine performance and emissions. Biomass and Bioenergy 2001;20:317–25

52. L. Kallivroussis; A. Natsis; G. Papadakis. The energy balance of sunflower production for biodiesel in Greece. Biosystems Engineering 2002; 81 (3):347–54.

53. Calliope Panoutsou, Irene Namatov, Vassilis Lychnaras, Anastasia Nikolaou. Biodiesel options in Greece. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008; 32: 473 – 81.

54. Christian Bomb, Kes McCormick, Ewout Deurwaarder, Tomas Ka° berger. Biofuels for transport in Europe: Lessons from Germany and the UK. Energy Policy 2007;35 :2256–67.

55. G.P. Hammond, S. Kallu, M.C. McManus. Development of biofuels for the UK automotive market. Applied Energy, 2008;85:506–15.

Page 37: Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Using Biodiesel PptV

Thank you