20
Engaging Involuntary Attention through Planting Design of American Botanic Gardens Caleb Melchior Candidate for Master of Landscape Architecture Landscape Affordances Network Major Professor Mary Catherine Kingery-Page Department of Landscape Architecture College of Architecture, Planning, and Design Kansas State University

Engaging Involuntary Attention through Planting …...Engaging Involuntary Attention through Planting Design of American Botanic Gardens Caleb Melchior Candidate for Master of Landscape

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EngagingInvoluntary Attention

through Planting Designof American Botanic Gardens

Caleb MelchiorCandidate for Master of Landscape Architecture

Landscape Affordances NetworkMajor Professor Mary Catherine Kingery-Page

Department of Landscape ArchitectureCollege of Architecture, Planning, and Design

Kansas State University

THE ALCHEMIST’S GARDEN, PERUGIA, ITALY

TIMES SQUARE, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK, USA

imag

e sou

rce: C

onno

lly, R

andy

. 201

1. Tim

es Sq

uare.

http

://ww

w.fli

ckr.c

om/p

hoto

s/ran

dyco

nnoll

y/65

9604

1739

/.

INVOLUNTARYnondirected miltisensual awareness, offering a wide range of possibilities for responsive action(Berman, Jones, Kaplan 2008, 1207; Kaplan & Kaplan 1995)

DIRECTEDcognitive awareness, usually offering a limited range of posibilities for responsive action (Berman, Jones, Kaplan 2008, 1207; Kaplan & Kaplan 1995)

TYPES OF ATTENTION

Today, we lack rich,

embodied knowledge of the world around us (Pallasmaa 2011).Urban forester Gustavvsson describes our situation as a

“culture of headlines instead of an honest belonging to knowledge” (Gustavsson 2005).In order to understand how to physically design to cultivate deep understanding,it is essential to understand how physical environments capture attention.

centers of knowledgemediating relationships between humans and plants (Monem & Craig 2007, Hohn 2008, Rakow & Lee 2011). Their functions include

acquiring preserving researching interpreting collections of living plants in designated places (Hohn 2008). These places provide

experiences that:

BOTANIC GARDENS

PROVIDE PLEASUREIMPART KNOWLEDGE

CONDITIONAL BETRAYAL BOTANIC GARDENS HAVE ATTEMPTED TO IMPART KNOWLEDGE BY CAPTURING DIRECTED ATTENTION

SUCH ATTEMPTS FAIL WITHOUT ENGAGING INVOLUNTARY ATTENTION

imag

e sou

rce: K

reus

sling

, Chr

is. 20

09. W

icked

Plan

ts To

ur at

Broo

klyn B

otan

ic Ga

rden

. http

://ww

w.fli

ckr.c

om/

phot

os/fl

atbu

shga

rden

er/3

7566

7544

0/.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How can the planting design of a botanic garden instigate involuntary attention, creating conditions for affective experiences?

FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT

APPLICATION TO DESIGN

PRECEDENT STUDY

LITERATURE REVIEW

CHAPMAN BOTANICAL

GARDENAPALACHICOLA, FL

THE MEADOW KANSAS STATE

UNIVERSITYMANHATTAN, KS

METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING

EXTENT BEING AWAY FASCINATION COMPATIBILITY

INFORMED BY LITERATURE REVIEW

PRECEDENT STUDIES

INFORMED BY PRECEDENT

STUDY

By focusing on the lowest common denominators of landscape experience, the study hopes to achieve a resulting framework that allows for wide applicability to gardens that will realize a wide variety of concepts and appeal to a wide variety of audiences.

DEFINE CONDITIONS THROUGH LITERATURE REVIEW

EXTENT BEING AWAY FASCINATION COMPATIBILITY

CHARLES JENCKS: Garden of Cosmic Speculation

GILLES CLEMENT: Serial Gardens, Parc Andre Citroen

PIET OUDOLF: Lurie Garden, Millennium Park

OEHME VAN SWEDEN: Native Plant Garden, New York Botanical GardenHITCHMOUGH, DUNNETT & PRICE: London Olympic Park PlantingsDARRELL MORRISON: Native Flora Garden, Brooklyn Botanic Garden

INFO

RMED

BY

PREC

EDEN

T ST

UD

Y

INFORMED BY PRECEDENT

STUDY

Contemporary planting design fights for attention in a technologically-saturated society.Planting design’s value has often been minimized,causing current practitioners toseek new waysto capture the visitor’s attention.

EXTRACTING PHYSICAL DESIGN STRATEGIES

ADAPTED FROM NOEL KINGSBURY’S MODEL OF CONTEMPORARY NATURALISTIC PLANTING DESIGN OVERVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY NATURALISTIC PLANTING

PIET OUDOLFLurie GardenMillennium ParkChicago, Illinois

GILLES CLEMENTSerial GardensParc Andre CitroenParis, France

CHARLES JENCKSGarden of Cosmic CirculationDumfries, Scotland

FORMALISM MASS PLANTING INFORMAL PLANTING

imag

e sou

rce: E

linor.

2008

. The

Gar

den o

f Cos

mic

Spec

ulatio

n. ht

tp://

www.

flick

r.com

/pho

tos/

elino

rp/4

2219

7888

4/.

imag

e sou

rce: N

ieuwe

ndijk

, Stij

n. 20

13. P

arc A

ndré

Citro

ën. h

ttp://

www.

flick

r.com

/pho

tos/

stijn

nieuw

endij

k/92

5937

5966

/.

ADAPTED FROM NOEL KINGSBURY’S MODEL OF CONTEMPORARY NATURALISTIC PLANTING DESIGN OVERVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY NATURALISTIC PLANTING

DARRELL MORRISONNative Flora GardenBrooklyn Botannic GardenBrooklyn, New York

HITCHMOUGH, DUNNET & PRICE2012 London Olymic Park PlantingsLondon, England

OEHME VAN SWEDENNative Plant GardenNew York Botanical GardenNew York City, New York

STYLIZED NATURE BIOTOPE PLANTING HABITAT RESTORATION

imag

e sou

rce: L

aura

W. 2

013.

New

Nativ

e Plan

t Gar

den a

t NYB

G. ht

tp://

www.

hvga

rden

journ

al.co

m/2

013/

05/2

2/ne

w-na

tive-

plant

-gar

den-

at-n

ybg/

.

imag

e sou

rce: C

enta

urs,

Scor

pions

and.

2012

. Wild

Flow

ers a

nd th

e Olym

pic St

adium

. http

://ww

w.fli

ckr.c

om/p

hoto

s/ssh

b/79

5486

9146

/.

imag

e sou

rce: a

louch

a. 20

11. N

ative

Flor

a Sun

set (

June

1, 20

11).

http

://ww

w.fli

ckr.c

om/

phot

os/a

louch

a/57

9832

5619

/

Critical drawing offers the possibility of getting to know the proposed design at both a cognitive and kinesthetic level (Dutoit 2008, Treib 2008, Dee 2012).

Critical drawings for each project will consist of a plan and three sections.

CRITICAL DRAWING TO UNDERSTAND & EXTRACT

Critical Drawingcolored pencil drawing based on planting plan by Piet Oudolf published in Piet Oudolf: Landscapes in Landscapes.Oudolf and Kingsbury 2011.

Planting Plan: Nantucket Section X.06published in Piet Oudolf: Landscapes in Landscapes.Oudolf and Kingsbury 2011.

EXTENT BEING AWAY FASCINATION COMPATIBILITY

CHARLES JENCKS: Garden of Cosmic Speculation

GILLES CLEMENT: Serial Gardens, Parc Andre Citroen

PIET OUDOLF: Lurie Garden, Millennium Park

OEHME VAN SWEDEN: Native Plant Garden, New York Botanical GardenHITCHMOUGH, DUNNETT & PRICE: London Olympic Park PlantingsDARRELL MORRISON: Native Flora Garden, Brooklyn Botanic Garden

INFO

RMED

BY

PREC

EDEN

T ST

UD

Y

INFORMED BY PRECEDENT

STUDY

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS:

•INFORMING NEW PLANTING DESIGN

•OFFERING INCREMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

•EVALUATION OF EXISTING SITES

FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGN

REDESIGN: CHAPMAN BOTANICAL GARDEN

APALACHICOLA, FLORIDAChapman Botanical Garden is intended to memorialize a Florida botanist, Dr Alvin Wentworth Chapman (Cox 2010). Today, however, the site (approximately 10 acres) is barely a fitting tribute. It fails to support pleasurable human experience. The process for inquiry through design of Chapman Botanical Garden will involve contextual and site research, compilation of base maps, programming, and planting design development.

SITUATING CHAPMAN BOTANICAL GARDEN

Western Florida is home to many National Forests and other sensitive natural habitats, many of these strictly limit public access. Chapman Botanical Garden offers the potential to trigger mindful human involvement with landscape in an area that has deep ecological and social needs. Chapman Botanical Garden could be a highly utilized resource for both residents of the Apalachicola region and tourists who come to enjoy the beauty of the west Florida coast.

THE MEADOW

EVALUATING EXISTING PLANTING & INFORMING INCREMENTAL DESIGN• PARTICIPATE IN ADDITIONAL PLANT SELECTION AND PLANT PLACEMENT

• CREATE GRAPHICS FOR A TOUCHTABLE INSIDE BEACH MUSEUM TO AUGMENT MUSEUM EXPERIENCE

• CREATE INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE TO AUGMENT INVOLUNTARY ATTENTION WITH DIRECTED ATTENTION

How can the planting design of a botanic garden instigate involuntary attention, creating conditions for affective experiences?

PRECEDENT STUDIES

FRAMEWORKDEVELOPMENT

LITERATUREREVIEW

DESIGN APPLICATION

LANDSCAPE AFFORDANCES NETWORK MAJOR PROFESSOR MARY-CATHERINE KINGERY-PAGE

JAMES HITCHMOUGH, UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD

for more about Calebwww.calebmelchior.weebly.com

[email protected]

mail409 PCR 316Perryville, MO 63775

instagram@onlythehellebored

pinterestcalebmelchior

unless attributed otherwise,all images are by author

THANKS!

Ballantyne, Roy, Jan Packer, and Karen Hughes. 2008. “Environmental Awareness, Interests and Motives of Botanic Gardens Visitors: Implications for Interpretive Practice.” Tourism Management 29 (3) (June): 439–444. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.006.

Berman, Marc G., John Jonides, and Stephen Kaplan. 2008. “The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature.” Psychological Science 19 (12) (December 1): 1207–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.

Chan, Kai M.A., Terre Satterfield, and Joshua Goldstein. 2012. “Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values.” Ecological Economics 74 (February): 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.

Connell, Joanne, and Denny Meyer. 2004. “Modelling the Visitor Experience in the Gardens of Great Britain.” Current Issues in Tourism 7 (3): 183–216. doi:10.1080/13683500408667979.

Corner, James. 2008. “The Hengchun Tropical Botanical Gardens, Taiwan.” Topos: European Landscape Magazine.

Cox, Dale. 2010. “Chapman Botanical Garden - -Apalachicola, Florida.” Explore Southern History.com. http://www.exploresouthernhistory.com/chapmangarden.html.

Cronon, William. 1995. Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Dee, Catherine. 2008. “Plus and Minus: Critical Drawing for Landscape Design.” In Drawing/thinking Confronting an Electronic Age, 60–71. London; New York: Routledge. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=511849.

———. 2012. To Design Landscape Art, Nature & Utility. London; New York: Routledge. http://ezproxy.library.arizona.edu/login?url=http://lib.myilibrary.com/detail.asp?ID=383341.

Designing in the Prairie Spirit: A Conversation with Darrel Morrison. 2012. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYAdTQIU110&feature=youtube_gdata_player.

Dunnett, Nigel, Wolfram Kircher, and Noel Kingsbury. 2004. “Communicating Naturalistic Plantings: Plans and Specifications.” In The Dynamic Landscape: Design, Ecology and Management of Naturalistic Urban Planting, 244–255. London ; New York: Spon Press.

Dutoit, Allison. 2008. “Looking as Inquiry: Drawing the Implied Urban Realm.” In Drawing/thinking Confronting an Electronic Age, 148–159. London; New York: Routledge. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=511849.

ECSite: European Network of Science Centres and Museums. 2006. “The Impact of Science & Discovery Centres: A Review of Worldwide Studies.”

Edwards, I. Darwin. 2000. “Education by Stealth: The Subtle Art of Educating People Who Didn’t Come to Learn.” Roots 20 (July): 37–40.

Filor, Seamus. 2004. “Parc Andre Citroen.” Urbane Landscaftsarchitektur Als Aufgabe: 179–181.

Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gough, Meghan Z., and John Accordino. 2011. “The Role of Public Gardens in Sustainable Community Development.” In , 79. Association of Public Gardens (APGA). http://publicgardens.org/files/files/Sustainable%20Communities%202011.pdf.

Gurian, Elaine Heumann. 2004. “What Is the Object of This Exercise? A Meandering Exploration of the Many Meanings of Objects in Museums.” In Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift, edited by Gail Anderson, 269–283. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press.

Gustavsson, Roland, Martin Hermy, C.C. Konijnendijk, and Anne Steidle-Schwahn. 2005. “Management of Urban Woodland and Parks - Searching for Creative and Sustainable Concepts.” In Urban Forests and Trees: a Reference Book, edited by C. C. Konijnendijk, 369–397. Berlin: Springer.

Herzog, Thomas R., Colleen, P. Maguire, and Mary B. Nebel. 2003. “Assessing the Restorative Components of Environments.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2) (June): 159–170. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5.

Hitchmough, James. 2008. “New Approaches to Ecologically Based, Designed

Urban Plant Communities in Britain: Do These Have Any Relevance in the United States?” Cities and the Environment (CATE) 1 (2) (November 20). http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol1/iss2/10.

Hitchmough, James, and Nigel Dunnett. 2013. “Design and Planting Strategy in the Olympic Park, London.” Topos: European Landscape Magazine.

Hohn, Timothy C. 2008. Curatorial Practices for Botanical Gardens. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Hunt, John Dixon. 2008. Nature over Again: The Garden Art of Ian Hamilton Finlay. London: Reaktion.

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London ; New York: Routledge.

Jencks, Charles. 2003. The Garden of Cosmic Speculation. London: Frances Lincoln.Johnson, Nuala Christina. 2011. Nature Displaced, Nature Displayed: Order and

Beauty in Botanical Gardens. Tauris Historical Geography Series 7. London ; New York: I.B. Tauris.

Jones, Louisa, and Clive Nichols. 2012. Mediterranean Landscape Design: Vernacular Contemporary. London; New York: Thames & Hudson.

Kaplan, Rachel, and Stephen Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: a Psychological Perspective. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kingsbury, Noël. 2004. “Contemporary Overview of Naturalistic Planting Design.” In The Dynamic Landscape: Design, Ecology and Management of Naturalistic Urban Planting, edited by Nigel Dunnett and James Hitchmough, 58–96. London ; New York: Spon Press.

Marris, Emma. 2013. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-wild World.McLuhan, Marshall. 1967. The Medium Is the Message. New York: Bantam Books.Monem, Nadine Käthe, and Blanche Craig, ed. 2007. Botanic Gardens: a Living

History. London: Black Dog.Nassauer, Joan Iverson. 1995. “Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames.” Landscape

Journal 14 (2) (September 21): 161–170. doi:10.3368/lj.14.2.161.New York Botanical Garden. 2012. Native Plant Garden Video. http://vimeo.

com/51244678.Olin, Laurie. 2008. “More Than Wriggling Your Wrist (or Your Mouse): Thinking,

Seeing, Drawing.” In Drawing/thinking Confronting an Electronic Age, 82–99. London; New York: Routledge. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=511849.

Oudolf, Piet. 2011. Piet Oudolf: Landscapes in Landscapes. London: Thames & Hudson.

Oudolf, Piet, and Noël Kingsbury. 2013. Planting: a New Perspective. 1st ed. Portland, Or: Timber Press.

Packer, Jan. 2013. “Visitors’ Restorative Experiences in Museum and Botanic Garden Environments.” In Tourist Experience and Fulfilment: Insights from Positive Psychology, edited by Sebastian Filep and Philip Pearce, 202–213. Routledge.

Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2011. “Selfhood and the World: Lived Space, Vision, and Hapticity.” In Senses and the City an Interdisciplinary Approach to Urban Sensescapes, 49–62. Wien; Berlin; Münster: Lit.

Pyle, Robert Michael. 2003. “Nature Matrix: Reconnecting People and Nature.” Oryx 37 (02): 206–214. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000383.

Rakow, Donald Andrew, and Sharon A Lee. 2011. Public Garden Management. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

Roberts, Lisa C. 2004. “Changing Practices of Interpretation.” In Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift, edited by Gail Anderson, 212–232. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press.

Rocca, Alessandro. 2008. Planetary Gardens: The Landscape Architecture of Gilles Clément. Basel; Boston: Birkhäuser.

Schmidt, Sarah. 2013. “Native Flora Garden Expansion: A Link to Our Natural History.” Brooklyn Botanic Garden. February 28. http://www.bbg.org/news/native_flora_garden_expansion.

Tilley, Christopher Y. 2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology 1. Oxford ; New York: Berg.

Treib, Marc. 2008. “Paper or Plastic? Five Thoughts on the Subject of Drawing.” In Drawing/thinking Confronting an Electronic Age, 12–27.

London; New York: Routledge. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=511849.

WORKS CITED