Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
379/V'
PRODUCTION AND ENERGY METABOLISM IN THREE BENTHIC
INSECT POPULATIONS IN A SMALL NORTH CENTRAL
TEXAS POND
THESIS
Presented to the Graduate Council of the
North Texas State University in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
by
Daniel J. Benson, B.S.
Denton, Texas
May, 1978
Benson, Daniel J., Production and Energy Metabolism in
Three Benthic Insect Populations in a Small North Central
Texas Pond. Master of Science (Biology), May, 1978, 70 pp.,
20 tables, bibliography, 87 titles.
Annual energy budgets of dominant benthic macro-inver-
tebrates were examined during November 1973 to October 1974
from the benthos of a small pond ecosystem in north-central
Texas. Estimates of annual secondary production (Hynes and
Coleman 1968) were Procladius s. (Diptera, Chironimidae),
-2 -1 -2 -1.2.4 g m y (13 kcal m y ); Tendipes decorus (Diptera,
-2 -1-2-Chironomidae), 6.0 g m y (40 kcal m y ); Brachycercus
-2- -2 -1s (Ephemeroptera, Caenidae), 1.9 g m y 1 (11 kcal m y-).
Energy metabolism was measured in the laboratory at
six seasonally encountered temperatures (5, 10, 15, 20, 25,
and 30 C) on an acclimatization basis, and then extrapolated
to the field. Estimates of annual energy metabolism are
-2 -lProcladius sp., 5.0 kcal m y ; Tend decorus, 17.2
-2y-1 -2Y-1kcal m y ; Brachycercus sp. 40.0 kcal m y.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES...............
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.. .......
Page
iv
... vi
Chapter
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . ..
II. METHODS AND MATERIALS
1
.......... . ........ 4
The Study SitePopulation DynamicsProductionEnergy MetabolismEnergy Flow
III. RESULTS.......................... . . 15
Physical MeasurementsSeasonal Variation in Population
and BiomassProductionEnergy MetabolismEnergy Flow
IV. DISCUSSION....*.... . ............. 52
The Study SitePopulation DynamicsProductionEnergy MetabolismEnergy Flow
BIBLIOGRAPHY. . . . .*. .0.... . . . . .4....-...-....63
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
I. Benthic Organisms Present in NTSU Golf CoursePond during June, 1973, to October, 1974. . .
II. Density and Biomass Estimates of ChironomidPopulations from the Benthos of theNTSU Pond from July, 1973, to October,1974. . . . . . . . . . .... .-.-.......
III. Density and Biomass Estimates of Two Speciesof Insect and One Species of Annelidfrom the NTSU Pond from July, 1973, toNovember, 1974 . . . . . . . ............
IV. Population Estimates for each Instar of each
Species of Chironomidae from November,1973, to October, 1974......0.0.. .....
V. Biomass Estimates for each Instar of eachSpecies of Chironomiade from November,1973, to October, 1974....................
VI. Population Estimates for each 0.5 mm SizeClass of Brachycercus sp. from November,1973, to October, 1974. ....... &.......
VII. Biomass for Each 0.5 mm Size Class ofBrachycercus sp. from November, 1973, toOctober, 1974 . .......................
VIII. Annual Secondary Production by Procladius sp.from November, 1973, to October, 1974 . .
IX. Annual Secondary Production by Tendipes decorusduring November, 1973, to October, 1974 .
X. Annual Secondary Production by Brachycercussp. from November, 1973, to October,1974. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . .o
XI. Comparison of Metabolic Rates among Three Ben-thic Insects at Six Seasonal AcclimationTemperatures... . . . . .. .o.o... -..
iv
Page
XII. ANOVA for Acclimatization Metabolic Rates AmongThree Species of Benthic Insects at Six
Seasonal Temperatures. ....... ......-.-
XIII. Relation of Log Metabolic Rate to Log Dry
Weight in Three Species of Benthic Insects
at Six Seasonal Acclimatization Tempera-tures (AT) . -. . .-- - -0- --0 - --0 -
XIV. ANCOVA for Effect of Log Dry Weight on Log
Weight Specific Metabolic Rates of Three
Benthic Insects at Six Seasonal Acclimati-
zation Temperatures.....0...................
XV. Tukey's Multiple Range Tests of Weight-AdjustedMetabolic Rates for Three Species of Ben-
thic Insects at Six Seasonal Acclimatiza-
tion Temperatures.1..................-.....
XVI. Q1's for Weight-adjusted Metabolic Rates forThree Species of Benthic Insects at Six
Seasonal Acclimatization Temperatures. .
XVII. Annual Energy Flow in Two Species of Midge
Larvae and One Species of Mayfly Nymph
from the Benthos of a Small Pond Ecosys-
tem in North-central Texas ...........
XVIII. Comparisons of Secondary Production in Selec-
ted Populations of Benthic Inverte-brates .................... 0.........
XIX. Comparison of Annual Population Energeticsof Selected Aquatic Insects.............
XX. Comparison of Annual Benthic Community Ener-getics .i.............................
V
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
1. Map of the North Texas State University GolfCourse Pond Showing the Location ofSampling Stations........................
2.a. Temperature Changes in the NTSU Golf CoursePond During June, 1973, to November, 1974.
2.b. Area and Volume Changes in the NTSU GolfCourse Pond During June, 1973, to October,1974.......................................
3. Population Densities and Biomass Estimates forFour Species of Insect and One Species ofAnnelid Found in the NTSU Golf course PondDuring July, 1973, to October, 1974. . . .
4. Population Density and Biomass for the TotalBenthic Community of the NTSU Golf CoursePond During July, 1973, to October, 1974 . ..
5. Acute, weight-adjusted acclimatization R-TCurves of Three Species of Insect Foundin the NTSU Golf Course Pond............a.
vi
INTRODUCTION
Since Lindeman (1942) introduced the concept of tro-
phic dynamics, ecologists have been interested in testing
hypotheses concerning trophic energy relationships and sta-
bility of ecosystems (e.g. Margalef 1963, Odum 1968). Re-
cently, with the introduction of systems theory to ecology
and the widespread availability of the appropriate computer
technology, integrated, holistic studies of ecosystems ne-
cessary to test hypotheses concerning structure and beha-
vior of ecosystems have become possible (e.g. Teal 1962,
Odum 1962, Vollenweider 1969, Schindler and Comita 1972,
Comita 1972, Brylinski 1973). However, considering the in-
creasing importance of surface waters, relatively few holis-
tic studies of aquatic ecosystems are available (e.g. Odum
1957, Welch 1967, Tilly 1968, Patten et al.1975, 1976).
Ponds and small lakes comprise a significant part of
the surface waters in the southwestern United States and
the demand for these multi-purpose impoundments is rapidly
increasing. Although it is intuitively obvious that a large
percentage of the surface waters in the United States is
found in small natural and man-made ponds, realization of
their ecological significance is relatively recent (e.g.
Gollop 1954, Smith et al-1964, Lietch 1966, Stuart and
Kantral 1971, Millar 1976, Driver and Pedan 1977). Holistic
1
2
studies on trophic dynamics and energy flow are important
to our understanding and management of these resources.
Therefore, holistic studies of ponds are appropriate and
timely. Accordingly, a systems analysis and modeling pro-
ject of trophic dynamics of a small pond on the golf course
at North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, was begun
in June of 1973. The pond was well suited for this type
of study as it supports a diverse biological community
which is similar to those found in larger impoundments in
North Central Texas. The small size of the pond permitted
more accurate sampling than would be possible in a large
impoundment.
The experimental-components approach, as first pro-
posed formally by Hollings (1966), was utilized in the com-
puter modeling project of the NTSU pond ecosystem. The
major object of my study was to describe the trophic dyna-
mics and energy flow through the macro-benthic community
of the pond. Other compartments of the ecosystem are pre-
sented in four other theses (Jones 1975, Kelly 1975, Smith
1976, Childress in prep.) and several publications and ma-
nuscripts (Jones et al-1977a, Jones et al.1977b, Kelly et
al-1977, Smith et al.1977).
Benthic insects with their high densities and turnover
rates are important agents of energy flow in aquatic eco-
systems as contributors to the diets of many fish. Conse-
quently, there is an increasing emphasis on studies of ben-
thic energetics (e.g. Jonasson, 1972, Welch 1976).
3
In addition, energy budgets of several benthic invertebrates
from a wide variety of aquatic ecosystems are rapidly ap-
pearing in the literature (e.g. Fischer 1966, McDiffett
1970, Lawton 1971, Kimerle and Anderson 1972, Charles et al.
1975, Heiman and Knight 1975). Brown and Fitzpatrick's
(1977) study of a carnivorous lotic insect (Corydalus cor-
nutus, Megaloptera, Corydalidae) is the most complete study
of life-history and population energetics of a benthic in-
vertebrate in the Southwest that I am aware of.
The specific objectives of this study were to taxo-
nomically characterize benthic macroinvertebrates; deter-
mine variations in the population densities and biomasses
of the principal taxa; estimate annual secondary production
of the principal taxa; determine effects of seasonally en-
countered temperatures on energy metabolism of the princi-
pal taxa; and estimate annual energy flow through the ben-
thic community to higher trophic levels.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
The Study Site
The pond (Fig. 1), located in Denton Texas (330 12' N.,
970 10' W.), was built in 1947 as a stock tank and is now
used to irrigate the NTSU golf course and as a water hazard.
Filling is accomplished by runoff from a 10 ha watershed
and a well drilled into the Trinity sandstone. Problems
with the pumping mechanism allowed drastic fluctuations in
water level in the summer and fall months in 1973. By late
fall the pump was working properly and drawdowns were less
severe through 1974, but still represented a principal phy-
sical stress on the pond's biota.
The pond is roughly elliptical,with its major axis
roughly north-south. There is an island in the northern
section and a rip-rapped earthen dam on the southern, deep-
est end. Both the dam on the southern side of the pond and
the shallow channel on the northern side of the island are
rimmed by small stands of black willows (Salix nigra) and
post oaks (Quercus stellata). The eastern side of the pond
is bordered by a dirt road which runs parallel to the pond
a few meters from its edge and which contributed signifi-
cant amounts of dust to the pond. The western side of the
pond is bordered by fairway.
4
5
Ambient air and water temperatures were continuously
monitored with a recording thermograph located in a box on
top of the outlet pipe at the deepest part of the pond.
The water-temperature probe was secured 1 m from the bot-
tom of the pond. Mean temperatures were taken from the
thermograph weekly and plotted for the year. Mean annual
temperature for the pond was 20 C. Mean volume was 15,000
m3 and the mean area was 0.94 ha. The maximal depth of
the pond when full was 3.5 m, the mean depth 1.5 m.
Three distinct substrate types were present in the
pond. The northern 40% of the pond consisted of light-
colored clay and sand. The southern and deeper 40% of the
pond was dark silt and fine organic matter. The perimeter
of littoral zone of the pond (about 3 m from the shoreline)
made up the remaining 20% of the pond. This area contained
leaves from surrounding trees, grass and shrub cuttings
from the golf course, and some algae and attached vegeta-
tion. Most of the algal mats were destroyed early in the
study by seining for fish and by hand-raking by the golf
course groundskeepers, who believed that this vegetation was
responsible for clogging the outlet pipe used for withdraw-
ing water for irrigation.
Population Dynamics
Quantitative samples were taken approximately monthly
from July 1973 to October 1974 at 12 sampling stations which
were selected to reflect the heterogeneity of the bottom
6
(Fig. 1). Thus, four samples were taken from the northern
sand-and-clay substrate, six were taken from the dark-silt
substrate found south of the transect, and two were taken
from the leaf detritus of the littoral zone. The sampling
regime was thus "self-weighted" (Wadley 1952, cited by
Southwood 1966); that is, the number of repetitions taken
in each substrate type is proportional to their relative
size. Station 10 was not sampled between August and
November 1973, or in January, July and August 1974 because
of low water. Samples were taken with a standard-size
Ekman dredge, which gives consistent and reproducible re-
sults (Milbrink 1973) following techniques described by
Southwood (1966). Live organisms were hand-picked in the
laboratory with the aid of a 2X-macroscope. Organisms were
grouped according to family and preserved in 70% ethanol.
A large number of benthic species were present in the
pond throughout the study period (Table 1, Results). How-
ever, species which comprised less than 1% of the samples
taken during July through October 1973 were omitted from
the study. Energy flow studies (production, P and respira-
tion R) were measured from 20 November 1973 to 28 October
1974, for the three species with the highest densities and
biomasses during the first four months of sampling. These
were the mayfly, Brachycercus sp., and chironomids, Procla-
dius sp. and Tendipes decorus. Identification of the chi-
ronomid genera was accomplished by Dr. Bill Stark on adults
7
Fig. 1. Map of the North Texas State University Golfcourse pond showing the location of sampling stations.
GOLF COURSEPOND
N
30 o9D90TRANSrT
BRIDGE
to 20 A.O 0 _ o DRAIN
SCALE IN METERS A& INLETaL
9
from an emergence induced in the laboratory. Construction of
length-frequency and head capsule width-frequency histograms
indicated that the species were multivoltine with consider-
able overlap between generations. They could not be sepa-
rated into cohorts.
Production
Annual secondary production (P) of Brachycercus sp.,
Procladius sp. and Tendipes decorus) was calculated accor-
ding to Hynes and Coleman (1968) as modified by Hamilton
(1969) and used by Waters and Crawford (1973).
Body lengths of preserved nymphs of Brachycercus s.
were measured (N = 3627) from the top of the pronotum to
the tip of the abdomen, excluding the cerci. These were
separated into 0.5 mm size classes and counted. Head cap-
sulate widths (HCW) of Procladius sp. and T. decorus (N =
2129) were measured to the nearest 0.05 mm using a dissect-
ing microscope with an ocular micrometer. Four instars
were clearly present in the chironomids. McCauley (1974)
stated that chironomids should have four instars in tempe-
rate climates. All nymphs of Brachycercus sp. and larvae
of Procladius sp. and T. decorus of a given size class or
instar (pupae of the chironomid species were considered a
fifth instar and each instar will be referred to as a size
class hereafter) were dried for 24 h in a vacuum oven at
60 C and cooled in a vacuum dessicator for 2 h. Group
weights were measured on an electronic balance (+ 0.1 mg)
10
and individual weights were calculated as total weight/N.
To correct for weight lost during preservation in alcohol,
dry weights obtained from preserved specimens were in-
creased by 25 percent (Jonasson 1972).
Energy Metabolism
Energy metabolism (R) of Brachycercus s Procladius
sp. and T. decorus and their patterns of metabolic compen-
sation or acclimatization (Prosser 1973) to six seasonally
encountered temperatures, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 C, were
examined by indirect calorimetry with a Gilson respirometer.
Six collections of Brachycercus sp. nymphs and Procladius
sp. and T. decorus larvae were taken during 23 October 1974
to 13 October 1975 for respirometry after the pond's tem-
perature had been close to (+ 3 C) 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30
C for 5 days. These temperatures were considered to be
acclimatization temperatures (AT). Specimens, collected at
dusk, were transferred to the laboratory, separated accor-
ding to species, and maintained overnight in aerated and
filtered (0.04 p) pond water at the specimens' AT. An auto-
claved sand substrate was provided for the chironomids to
burrow in and a thin nylon mesh was provided for the may-
flies to cling to.
Mayflies and the chironomids were placed according to
size in Warburg respirometry vessels (N = 10 equal-sized
insects per vessel) at dawn of the following day. The
vessels contained 5 ml of filtered (0.04 p) pond water at
11
the AT and the appropriate substrate. Carbon dioxide was
absorbed with 10% KOH. Experimental temperatures (ET) were
held within + 0.1 C of the AT. Respiration measurements,
begun after a 1-h equilibration period, were taken between
600 and 1800 h CST under light conditions. Oxygen consump-
tion rates were measured directly as al0 2 h~ for the ten
insects in each reaction vessel. After measurements were
completed, the insects were vacuum-dried at 60 C for 24 h
and cooled in a desiccator before dry weights (+ 0.1 mg)
were determined. Metabolic rates were calculated as Pl 02
h~ per individual and pl 02 mg~ dry weight h~ for each
species at each of the six AT's. Because the insects were
relatively inactive and measured at their acclimatization
temperatures, the rates (adjusted to STP) represented rest-
ing acclimatization rates (RAR).
Measuring the insects' RAR required collecting speci-
mens at different times during the year when the pond had
been at the appropriate temperature for at least 5 days.
Thus, weights of experimental AT groups differed consider-
ably (i.e. the insects were in different instars or nymphal
stages). Densities varied and affected the sample sizes
greatly. Thus, when specimens were pooled to produce a
metabolically-significant mass, the number of different ves-
sels (N) was often low, contributing to high variances in
the data. Additional variance occurred because at some AT's
only early or late instars were available, resulting in a
12
very low or very high dry weight, respectively; at some
AT's all instars were present, which produced large vari-
ations in weights. At all times, ten specimens of nearly
equal size were intentionally grouped in each respirometry
vessel to measure the effect of weight on 02 consumption.
Significant differences in mean weight-specific meta-
bolic rates between species at each AT were tested with a
Fisher's t-test. A one-by-three nalysis of variance (va-
riable = py1 02 mg~- dry wt h1 ) was used to examine vari-
ance in weight-specific metabolic rate among the three spe-
cies at each AT. Regression equations were calculated for
log metabolic rate (R) vs log mg dry weight (W) at each AT.
A two-way analysis of covarince (covariate = logl 0
mg dry wt; criterion = log1 0 pl 0 mg - dry wt h) was
used to determine the effect of weight on variance in
weight-specific metabolic rates, and to adjust weight-
specific rates to a common weight. Significant differences
in mean weight-specific metabolic rates within species among
the six AT's were tested with a Tukey's multiple range test.
Values for Q1 0 's were calculated on weight-adjusted mean
metabolic rates for each species between each AT to detect
patterns of metabolic compensation. Weight-adjusted mean
metabolic rates were converted to calories with the oxyca-
loric coefficient (4.825 X 10-3 c 1l ) suggested by
Brody (1945).
13
Energy Flow
Energy flow was calculated for the two chironomid and
the mayfly populations as
Energy Flow (A) = P + R (I)
Where A = Assimilation, P = Production, and R = meta-
bolic energy loss. Values for P and R, empirically deter-
-2 -l -l -lmined as g m y and p1 02 g h respectively, were con-
verted to kcal m 2 y 1 . Caloric equivalents for conversion
of production data followed values from Cummins and Wuycheck
(1971). Metabolic energy losses were summed from November
1973 to October 1974 according to
12R = Z (r w.) (hi (.004825)**
i=l t i ( 2)
Where
rt= The dry weight, temperature specific, metabolicrate of each species at the mean monthly tempe-rature t. ( il 02 g-1 h-1 ). r's for temperaturesother than the six experimentals were interpolatedwith Q10 data.
w = The mean dry biomass per square meter of the popu-lation of each species in the i'th month i.e.(B. + Bi+ )/2
h. Number hours per month, (r and temperatures as-sumed to remain constant f~r 30 days).
** = Oxycaloric coefficient for poikilotherms; Brody(1945).
Consumption rates for the chironomids were calculated
by assigning a 0.4 assimilation efficiency (A/C) (Welch 1968).
14
To my knowledge, there are no consumption data in the lite-
rature for caenid mayflies. Consumption was estimated for
Brachycercus sp. by using the consumption rate of fresh
jvater detritivores (3.0 g food g body wtWi day ) in Patten
et al (1975). Caloric equivalent of aquatic leaf detritus
(4249.6 cal g~ 1 ) was taken from Cummins and Wuycheck (1971).
Energy consumed but not put into production or consumed
in respiration was assumed lost as feces and urine (FU =
C -A).
RESULTS
Physical Measurements
Figure 2 presents physical data taken over the study
period. Water temperatures (Fig. 2a) ranged from 32 C in
mid-August to 4 C in early January, when the pond was par-
tially covered with ice for several days. Fluctuations in
water level (Fig. 2b) were drastic at times because of
drawdowns to water the greens, and subsequent refilling by
rain and well water. Volume was maximal in mid-June 1973
(18,900 m3) and early November 1973 (18,800 m3). Three
major drops in volume occurred during the study. The first
(to 13,000 m3) lasted from mid-July until late August 1973,
the second (to 10,900 m3) was in early January 1974, and
the third in March (to 11,500 m3). During these drawdowns
a large percentage of the animal and vegetable matter was
eliminated from the littoral zone.
During the 16 months of sampling (July 1973 to October
1974), the classes Insecta, Gastropoda and Annelida domi-
nated the benthic macroinvertebrates. Insects, especially
dipterans and ephemeropterans, were the most important in
terms of biomass and numbers throughout the study. Table I
lists the organisms which were identified.
The chironomids comprised 38% of the numbers and 26%
of the biomass of the benthic community. Procladius is a
15
16
Fig. 2a. Temperature changes in the NTSU golf coursepond during June, 1973, to November, 1974.
Fig. 2b. Area and volume changes in the NTSU golfcourse pond during June, 1973, to October, 1974.
40
30
w9 20
w-.
w
10
- 0e
" 0
* 0 :0 .0
* 0
.
*e 00.0
J J A SO ND J F M A M J J A S ON
1973 1974
20.0AREA
VOLUME15.0 L
10.0.
J JASON D L F MA MJ J A SO
1973 b, 1974
17
0
10.0
M3m
4
5.0
18
predacious genus which feeds mainly on other tendiped lar-
vae (Wirth and Stone 1956). Tendipes (Kiefferulus) decorus
(Johannsen) is a primary consumer (Wirth and Stone 1956)
commonly found in shallow, oxygen-deficient ponds and, may
produce several generations per year (Johanssen 1905). The
other dipteran studied was a phantom midge, Chaoborus sp.
(Chaoboridae), which accounted for 10% of the population
and 1% of the biomass of the macrobenthos. Chaoborus s.
is also a predator, chiefly on zooplankton (Wirth and Stone
1956). The most abundant inhabitant of the benthos during
the study was Brachycercus sp., which accounted for 50% of
the population and 59% of the biomass of the macrobenthos.
Brachycercus nymphs are tiny (less than 5mm) and are usual-
ly found in lotic habitats (Day 1957).
Dragonfly larvae, Somatachlora sp. (Odonata, Zygoptera,
Lebellulidae) were encountered in less than 1% of the sam-
ples, but turned out to be important in the energy flow of
the benthos, as certain species of fish fed on them very se-
lectively (Jones 1975; Childress, in preparation). The
annelid, Haplotaxis gordioides, comprised 14% of the popu-
lation and 12% of the biomass.
The biting midge Palpoya sp., the burrowing mayfly,
Hexagenia sp., and the small white freshwater snail, Physa
virgata, were encountered rarely and they were not important
in the diet of any of the fish examined by Jones (1975).
Therefore, they were not considered in this study.
19
TABLE 1. Benthic organisms present in NTSU golf coursepond during June 1973 to October 1974.
Class Order Family Genus Species
Insecta:Diptera;
Chironomidae,Tendipes decorusProcladius sD
Chaoboridae,Chaoborus s.
Ceratapog nidae,Palpoya
Odonata;Libellulidae,
Somatochlora sp.Ephemeroptera;
Caenidae,Brachycercus s-p.
Ephemeridae,Hexagenia sp.
Gastropoda:Bassommatophora;
Physidae,:Physa virgata
Anne lida:Oligochaeta;
Haplotaxidae,Ha.potaxis gordioides
20
Dragonfly larvae, although selected for by certain fish
(Jones 1975), had such low population densities that viable
density estimates could not be made.
The littoral zone (stations lA and 4A, Fig. 1) ap-
peared to be the preferred habitat for all species. Chiro-
nomids, mayflies and oligocheates were always found in these
two sampling stations, but were absent on more than 30% of the
sampling dates from the ten other stations combined. Chao-
borus sp. also preferred the littoral zone, occuring in 42%
of the time in samples from stations lA and 4A, and an ave-
rage of 15% in the other ten stations combined.
Seasonal Variation in Population Size and Biomass
Population density (N = Nm ) and biomass (B = mg dry
wt m-2) estimates are given in Tables 2 and 3 and Figures
3 and 4. Procladius sp. (see Fig. 2a and b) had an increas-
ing density (308 m-2 to 903 m-2) and biomass (28 mg m-2to
166 mg m-2) from 22 November to 20 December 1973. By 20
January 1974, the population had decreased to 184 m-2 with
a concomitant drop in biomass to 23 mg m-2. By the 22 Fe-
bruary sampling date, Procladius sp. had increased to 2254
m -2 with a biomass of 202 mg m-2 Numerous pupae (popula-
tion estimate of pupae 21 m-2 and biomass estimate of 19 mg
--2m 2 ) were found in the February 1974 samples indicating
that peak emergence occurred in February-March. The density
declined drastically by 18 March 1974 to 281 m-2 with a
corresponding drop in biomass to 17 mg m-2. There was a
21
general decline in density for Procladius sp. throughout
the rest of the spring and summer of 1974 to a low of 22
m-2 by the last sampling date, 22 October. Biomass also
declined slowly over this time period, with notable increases
on 19 April 1974 (to 24 mg m-2) and 27 July 1974 ( to 30
mg m-2
Tendipes decorus (see Figure 2c and d) was the dominant
chironomid and the second most abundant species present in
the pond during the study period. On 22 November 1973,
T. decorus was at a population level of 239 m-2, slightly
less than that of Procladius sp. on the same date (308 m-)2
The biomass estimate for T. decorus on that date was 111 mg
m -2. T. decorus exhibited a gain in both number and bio-
mass in December, (population was 706 m-2) with a biomass
of 224 mg m-2 on 20 December 1973), and by January 1974, it
had doubled (1693 m-2), but with a biomass decrease (167
mg m-2). Emergence in November 1973 was indicated by the
presence of a few pupae. By 22 February 1974, T. decorus
had declined to 410 m-2 but exhibited an increased biomass
of 247 mg m-2. By 18 March 1974, T. decorus had repeated
the pattern of doubling its density while decreasing in bio-
mass. By 18 March 1974, the population had increased to 841
m-2 and 150 mg m-2. Pupae were present in March and again
on 19 April 1974, indicating emergence occurred during these
months. Although there were more pupae in April than in
22
March, (25 m-2 in March and 33 mg m-2 in April), the pupae
in April were smaller than those in March, (31 mg m in
March and 12 mg m-2 in April 1974). The total population
of T. decorus decreased in April to 426 m- with a decrease
in biomass to 57 mg m.-2 The samples gathered on May 30,
1974, showed a decrease in both number and biomass (285 m-2
and 32 mg m-2). In the following month, density again de-
creased (to 216 m-2), whereas biomass increased to 43 mg
m- 2, ( on 29 June 1974). On 27 July the population for T.
decorus was 194 m-2, another decrease, while the biomass
was 68 mg m-2, a one-third increase. By 24 August 1974 the
density had risen to 410 m-2 while the biomass remained
about the same at 66 mg m .-2 On 28 September 1974 a few
pupae were present,indicating emergence; and both density
and biomass estimates doubled to 746 m and 120 mg m-2. On
28 October 1974, twice as many pupae were found as the pre-
vious month, but they weighed only about half as much (5 m-2
and 7 mg m-2 on 28 September, and 13 m-2 and 4 mg m-2 on 28
October 1974. The population of T. decorus behaved similar-
ly, with density almost doubled (1202 m-2) and biomass re-
duced by almost two-thirds (46 mg m-2) during the same pe-
riod.
Generally, both species showed high densities and bio-
masses during the winter and low values during the summer,
(see Fig. 3 e and f). The drop in biomass during January,
1974, coincided with the severe drawdown.
23
Brachycercus sp. (see Fig. 3g and h) exhibited large,
asynchronous variations in its population and biomass
through the study period. On 30 July 1973, the population
-2 -2was 545 individual.s/m with a biomass of 57 mg m-. By
26 August 1973, the population had dropped to 205 N m
with a biomass of 7 mg m-2, the lowest during the 16-month
study period. Population continued to decrease and on 25
September 1973, it reached 193 m-2, but with a higher bio-
mass of 25 mg m-2. By 16 October 1973, the population had
increased to 2007 m-2 with a biomass of 132 mg m-2 . By 22
November 1973, the population had decreased to 901 m-2
-2but the biomass had more than quadrupled to 590 mg m .
The following month population had doubled and biomass had
almost tripled from the previous month, 2080 m-2 and 1448
mg m-2 respectively on 20 December 1973. Although the po-
pulation increased to 2507 m-2 in January 1974 the biomass
decreased to 195 mg m.-2 By 22 February 1974 the density
was halved to 1230 m-2, while biomass remained nearly the
same at 128 mg m-2. By 18 March 1974 the population densi-
ty (2953 m-2) of Brachycercus sp. had recovered to the De-
-2cember 1974 level, as did the biomass (1151 mg m ). Those
levels were maintained through 19 April 1974 with a popu-
lation level of 2284 m-2 and a biomass estimate of 1339 mg
m -2. By 30 May 1974 there was a drastic decrease in both
numbers and biomass (440 m-2 and 45 mg m-2 ). There was an
increase again in both by 29 June 1974 (to 1061 m-2 and 215
mg m-2), followed by a gradual decrease through July until
o Q0 0 O O O OC rOCr OMO0mmwI H L C ) N CN r e co w atl N q lrH()IH (N r o H
OO' 3H H r N rNorm NO r-q o r--- r.- T-4
HH(
H
N rCN N m or- o o
(N C)O mO CO(NH0
H(NCmH
N (Y) H
4
10
4-4
to o
0 )-H H4.3
Cd MH0
04-)O 0
C)
rOH 0-d 44
o
rs
fd -4C'11;4'
-Hl H
0>4J
H4-4 5
oto O0) 0r, 44
-H rd
413
to 410 Q-
to :to Cl)Cd E-iO z
..Q 4
rO4 '4-4
Cd 0
C~- C)
E Q
m to 0 -A QO LO kr- Ns M ec raN qlO~~(OO
O;. CHHN(rN
H rrsN
WC m00)t
O o 0d rd 0
P4 E-4r '-4
04
rc3 0)
Som
Ed r4to p:4-4 50 o-
Cd H totiP4 0
4
ori 0
0a 4iP42
HCNOco
CC)GH(NNHH HH
O O Lo O ( C) N (N C0 O 0 Nm c CCmm N (Nr-N (N N( Hr-I mCCN(N(N(NN
H a44 4> 0 $,Q -4 4 >1 -iH 44-))D 000) Cd 0) )d d04d 0 ; W00
z 1O::) 4 )O0
H
24
()
rorO
0
0
-H4u
H-H-
f::v4
z
Hr N) r_ (rN mCO a1H N % 0 LTZ Lmn m m ':rQ ') eO (N rHN r H(N H H
C)
i r(NH.
(Nco
m
Hqr
N
(N)
N
LO~(N
Lr)
(N)
LO
Q0
qcnl
N
H
H
N
(NH
toH0o
t ^LA~
00mC)
-cl 0) -
LOn H L)(N
H (N
(N
.4to 4)-HH -Hri "ro o >
rc$ > 0-Hi 0IQ
-d ,-Qd> ,Q rd
OH*-r
(N O r-4-41 H OO r 400
S)40) 44.3
o z -H, 1 -HOE to
0) -
Q)z m M
H4-) 0
-. d 0)4to ~-3
(1) -H 4
r to4-4 0-
4 to 4-40 H 44-4d4 4C11 11 II I
lxd v D
N
H
HH (NNov.OrmNcN w0 mH wH
c00 m
CmHH(NH
mnomcO (ooN o(H CN ( N LON .r- 10 o N m 0";r L m tD r-
4-0
ro
Q
Q) Q
c Q
LH0
w 0
a) -
.
U) rQ-
0 >
4-)4-H0r~
4..J
ON
m rci
r- 4..
0p
$ p(d 4-
-H 0>, 4
04
rCO
-H H
2Cd
En044-)
ro
OH
0
'-H
O0
440
SU)oCd
(Y mO l- nO(Q N 00 CN
(NH H r-H-
%.0000 -H 0)H- L0 411
H-
HHHC\-4N HH
HCN O N w01N(N H H
r-q N l -- 0 w 4, o mqql 1 N RZ, M N - r-
c 0c co o eN )r-q 'cl C <N
HN000 I1
1 0 L N O 0LO cN (Y) a) :
r-iLr) qr
Lr) LO C N HC)Ln N r i 0 0) C
N N
LH"i
10 00 H 0IM m 00m100
mN m (Y)q:T - M e Hco
0 oy LO 00 q Q NCN 0 o
CN r- N N H
H 0) 04 4 -)> 0 4 Q ,.4 >-H O 'Q--U)-)$ )O O ) d M d 4 M:l: :IWo
- 4 M 0 Z Q 1-3r4 Z F:: Z I D D 4 M
N
25
N00H
N
H000N
00(N N H
O\OL0H
N--CN
L1HHIr-
0H-01
HH (N
C)
a)0
0Cd
-H r-5 gOn
Cno -
O\OLO (N
~00co
O\O0\
00
(N00
0\0(N1 0)
(Y o U
CN CN
4\O
\0LO Ln C)
. 1 -1 \F
0\0 o,
(N4 .
r~ 4~
-H
oH (I
>-H C>
-H -r 04
050U) 4- 44H4 :4-) 0
:)o 0
4J -H F:44-) 4 4::
~4 U)-PC
-H 4-
-P g
--) 0 )-
00H -P 4
(I -H-- 4H
005
r-I04 0 a)o0 .8 A0H i-4z)U)UC
U)
0
44m0
4-4
ri4O
N
0
04
cn I
26
Fig. 3. Population densities (upper figures) andbiomass (lower figures) estimates for four species of insectand one species of annelid found in the NTSU golf coursepond during July, 1973, to October, 1974. [a-b. Procladiussp. b-c. Tendipedes decorus. c-d. all chironomids, (i.e.the sum of a-d). e-f Brachycercus sp. g-h. Procladius sp.1-3. Haplotaxis gordioides. k-l Total benthic community,(i.e. the sum of a-j3 .
__LLLL L Th~ h
z-V N) AIISN30
L~LL..~LJ~i4LLIc
2
4
a
2
0
0
I fit LL.L..I00 0 8o 0 00
IN
UPE OW
4
2
0
2l
t
0
CliP.-
0
4
4
c\J
0
z
0
00 0 811
z-W N ) AIISN3O 2 80 I0
0
4
2
L..
0
8 Y0z-W On
0
'U)N;
4
2
4
2
0z
,0
(z-PN) AluSN3a
0- Z-A ON
I
KK
10
( z.VIN AIISN30
71~
(Z-&W N) '4SN30
10
4k4
j0
(-W N) AjJSN30
00
C\j
0
4
L~ L~ J L~iV)
I a I I
cu
0
00
2
29
Fig. 4. Population density (a) and biomass (b) for the totalbentt.ic community of the NTSU golf course pond during July, 1973 toOctober, 1974.
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
J A S0 ND J F M A M J J A S0973
1974b.
5000
4000
z 30 0 0
z2000
1000
A 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 01973
1974
30
31
24 August 1974, when there were only 24 m- 2 of these may-
flies with a biomass of 1 mg m- 2 . The population gradually
increased through 28 October 1974 to a level of 368 m-2
while the biomass stayed essentially the same. Pre-emergent
nymphs (nymphs with dark wing pads) were present throughout
the year and generally followed patterns exhibited by the
younger nymphs.
The phantom midge, Chaoborus sp. (Fig. 3i and j) showed
significant levels of population and biomass only in the
late summers of the study. On 30 July 1973 there were ap-
proximately 72 m-2 of Chaoborus sp. with a weight of 15 mg-2 -m . On 26 August 1973 there were only 20 m-2 but the bio-
mass was 10 mg m-2, more than the previous month. Chaoborus
sp. was at low densities until the following year/,when the
population jumped from 0 to 133 m-2, with a biomass of 33
-2mg m2, (28 September 1974). By 29 October 1974 the popu-
lation and biomass of Chaoborus sp. was halved to 76 m-2
and 13 mg m-2
The oligochaete H. gordioides (see Fig. 3k and 1) was
present throughout the study period in fairly high densities,
averaging 14% of the population and 12% of the biomass.
H. gordioides generally maintained synchronous fluctuations
in these estimates. High densities and biomass were obser-
ved on 31 May 1974 (1128 m-2 and 263 mg m-3) and on 28 Sep-
-2tember 1974 (1518 m- and 111 mg m-).
The sum of the biomass and density estimates of each
of the species (Fig. 4a and b), shows the general pattern
32
of high numbers and biomass in the colder winter months
when water levels were high and fish predation was lower
(Jones 1975). The large drop in biomass (to 412 mg m- 2 )
during January was not correlated with a similar drop in
population. On the contrary, the largest population level
occurred January 1974 (4708 m- 2 ).
Production
Table 4 and 5 show the distribution of population den-
sities and biomasses for the two chironomids according to
instar. There were large numbers of first instar larvae
which weigh very little. This trend is gradually reversed
until the largest chironomids are found within the fourth
instar. Apparently there is quite a bit of energy expendi-
ture during pupal transformation in T. decorus prior to em-
ergence, as pupae averaged 50% less in weight than fourth
instar larvae.
Tables 6 and 7 present estimates of population and
biomass apportioned between size classes of 0.5 mm in the
mayfly Brachycercus sp. Size class 1 was not encountered
(all nymphs exceeded 0.5 mm). Size classes 2 and 3 were
represented by much smaller numbers than expected, probably
due to the difficulty of separating them and loss through
the sieve bucket. Graphing size classes against frequency
yielded a bell-shaped curve, skewed to the right.
Annual secondary production by the two chironomids and
the mayfly are presented in Tables 8, 9 and 10 (constructed
rN Cn N V (N NI ,m om r C rqV N t '.O N N ( H H 10 C) (NL1 to 0o o H -D to (iN m r 0 (N
HH( NH H .. i
4-
0
04
4-4
0
4-)
Ur
o)C c
0
0LP*H H
0
00
4- Z
0 4-4
4-)
N
Za'0)
H 0
0
E-H
9
'1
r
000000
CN
(N
,.N
(N(NH-I
1QC00 o LC m)C o 00 oL m (N(NCm H 00
0o m qi e mr qqs se qrcll LO0 C1 I aZ Iv 00 L0 N Jis N 0
4jr Y) Ll) C) C4r Ln C) CN N :
41 Hr-
mr 4 r N LNr) ( Ng r00
m m C0 q )r - CH M CZ Cm 00NmO 00 N qrs~lL 4 3 r Ch m 4:31r--- N(q 0a 1 (N -q a ' l H (
00 10 M N) (N MH H N% H r (N00 rN (N r-I Q Nl L) m C) L N
M ) H (N'-.N q v
00 (Y) lz q) C) 0010C) O-i H (
(N
o LC) C) H
(N H H H
RI, 0)C)C)C)C)
q:4 X r-- MCn mr,- in Mr-I CM M MnrJ 00 N ' CC) N 100 H a' 00m1 N C) (N C) H H N(N HHHir-
CC) (N
101 qV) O% N 10 C) C') HON 0 0--mO LO 4 r r*-- mLm M r-
(N am
M' q C) CM) (N 10 r 'cO M C00 Ln 'q:I ll)Mr rH Hr-H Hr--
N ONr----- iia-' a
> 0 .Q P |i, H ,--0)4.p0 a )(0ca )d Q1 4 J aCl) 0z Q rDr., E 4 4g a g w 0
(NC)
00
H
CN
CC)
,-).(N
CC)
00
00
LC
CN0
Sa'
(NCC)
0z
33
P4
Z -H
CN
E- R-H
z
roo
Cto
E-i r-iE H(N
z r
OH q oL LO L rZ OH (N0 o CH,--1prorao(N H orN
to
U)
H
024
(N
H
Cd0)
..li4Jri0z
Cr)N
0z
(Y)
(N Ns toH-i
rdi
.iZH
r-
0)C
00O
C
4--0
U)Q)
4-40
4J
0*WI0)
U)0o
4J
0Cd
0
os(dJ
I o
4-)
4J
0
m>z
00
-O
Hn N
toHp%
MM Mo rH Ln r-i C M 0 OM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0
L C4 r-i N mm -rm o m C NoCqC)r-I N r-i r- C
H (N
10 )CN
0 0I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCI COH NS* a 0 * -* * 0 o * * 10 C O NH C3OC~ N H O 00L
(Mm cce-
clq,-0
N1 0
SLO M N 4T qTvIT N Itir-
r- r- co 0
N N:
o o : <0F <U000 0 C 0)Cd~CdbS~ i0)
a; 0 N N NO cc c
r- m r-I H Hr-4 r-
H-O0mo m UO)c'O O OLO
r- N l) *-qc, n () t.o o Nmcir- CN r-CN r- r-
. . . 0 .SOO)C0 o oo oCOr
- r- e-
0 1 0* 0 0 0 0 0a) a) cLo N m N N L tN r*-OsOs010CmLOrnC
r- r- N r-
0) LO0 0 0 N 0C 0 0 0 * m 0
0 m0LOLOr-q N0 t0 0 0m r- H- r-I
N~ rl* Ln M Nr 0 mm & k m
NH(N HHH (NJ r-
r- rll r-q N r-q r- r- N LO(N
34
HN
4to
0r-d
E-1
0
ccN00
CO
r -
00
H
0NN
10
CN
0
CD
10
CN
Cc(NJ
H
ZH
U)to
H I-r-qr-I
H I0 Nq
(NJ
CN
CO
HH
4-0
CO
CO
H
00,.C~Cd00
CON
0
H rO O Lf0 eO o LO
a)0o Ln N 03CN CNHN
T0 H .o H0Cq 1 ( NCN
CN 4r-1 HCt(N r-
4-10
rd
0-)
N
4-)
000
CN
Z 4
-4
Sa
0
I ~
.-C
(dHO
4- (D
(00N
0
erdP4 >
4
-
OH
Y) r 1 00 (N (N 00 r 00 r-N m n Ln M tO o M Ln LO(N (N . r- M(N
0 rN (1 00 (N r- 0 00 I 0 r-i in (Y) m CN C) in q;N 0)r-H HY r-i 14 H r-
0 ' 00 () 000 0 0000 mC wmin in (Y) o Itr 0) Hr- 0C)mr-q q tr o N r-
co 00)m .0 Nc00(N 000 co IC:) Lr
0- 0 Y34 (N R-1 0
O -i OOr* o0a) r-r -- R
( (N 0 (N
0 0 0 0 0
N Nr
a) cN
4 0 1Q 4 >4'HU), 04- 4-0 0 3 0) a) d r 0 0
Q Fa rz x4 :2 I ) ,'
35
(N
O H
mN r H-Hr-A Nr- cv O wsv 0qz H H m :-1 r-N N qr- f) r-NN H
UoC,)toto(djH
0)N
C')
0
00
ILf
N
H
r%-Lfr)LC)
00
r..i
LO
C~)H
eN
(N
rA
H
r-i
00(N
tcocc:
N
cor-
ON
C.N
H
(00
(N
00
00
C
-JrI0,:2:
(N
z)
N
.p00
N
0s
mo 4co M n I'D ko IN r*-- L m 0NN owo LO Nr HN
HI N (N
H- HHIIN N 0
N00 0o On nH- LO0 C(N (N 0(N (NHMM H 00Ho o (Y)N M r-H (N
r- IN r- r-i IN
36
CN T L 00 T 00 Immr- H H m 0 0
R Hrl) ( 9 4 OO r4 L L) O ; L a)" 04 m 3 s m N VL (Y "ZI r-i LO r-| r- r- 0
H-i H H r-q13>1
o (NCT VOrOOC-v CN
C 000 I * 0 0 * L00 0 R (Y)
N t -| L r- gr0
H Ir 00
0
U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RW r- -NH Lj N
*U VHCw IVN Or- o N r-00C L mNH 00 C4 0 * 0 * 0( a) 04C4 0 r40
Lo t0 00O-q r-I H -I "00U) 'N r-D00H HQ
r- I'l l 0 L 0 M r-i H N0* L
IC) 0 * * 0 0r- L r- - r-0
4-U(N
-- (y) 0i 0 LC 0 r-)Mr H LO
N- r- L . . 0 . . .- 0. 19.,.T .)0. .
0U H * * * * * 0 * *
L4 N -4H N0 C- L )N
SmCO)L0HH mH(N HN* 0r- 0e-*0 0 0 -,
r- i %DH mr- mcN r-IV C) (4
-IQo 4v r- C -m
4J ~O N r-r C 0 C r r- V -414 c.
>1 ) 0 00 * * 0 * *a *0 * *64 0 lqr CCNr-COLt)r(Y) n ( 4 (N N(N( >)H C H
- H
N 2 d HO (No H oO C (N -Y tl 00 0 0 -,L m qv CSC )H 0 qH N
-0q 0 0 0a 0 00
OC(N c H 00C00.H 0m z CH cOcOC)OcOCOOOOOOO C0C C C
.04)4 ON (nN N
i-I 0(Uao)oE- Z H1O>Q 4 g1 M 4-)E-4Z Q17)0X4UEj< (U F.) ::4W(U
37
. . . . IHH
ccin
0
H (N
n nU") m
o I'D
* (N0-
o- HIIn
SOC
-d i
00
H H
0 4
>1 Cl )oo
0
~NCC
0 I
C)z
o -OH p
0 0 0 0 '
CE-
E- -
Sm m I00 m.. 0') qW>1 C)H ( N 0
( N CCdn - CCd
r-4 C' A CCN H0 Z HHH
m0000 r-pz
-q 0
oj o X:3zp-PH
38
. . . . ILo OsOCOO H-NL (Y ) Ln c>N
CN r Cl
Q)) oo> 0z m cocc0 o
CN * 9U) If
Hn C&)
U) -) '2)4)
0 0
EQ4
00
ro
LC NQGt)
> -00
r-ni rO n o :
0 CN N N r- mi
-4>
ro
04a)
>1 -U) 0 0 *E- H U
ro Cl CllN9H 0
04-) C
() () ~~I ' L l
(3)I 0'-* S 0 & S
rdrc$CNd
00m*N N 0 H
~l 0CdCSI C'N Cl -0 Cl
* >
Cl) HC r) V Il
m C\]0 0
HCO
I I
9
0n r*--LOC) oq 0'0
0 r-iCN r-I oLO H " r- M CN
HONICNr-J (nN H-iI I
ci
0
r-I
04'44
4-
rd
>1
~0
.H4-)
0O
P4
>14
CdrO
0
CE-CQ
40
HO
r-L O
> o.
(NI U)
0U) r-
I H
z0Ln 04Li) Qaard
Cd
4-)4J1
0CFO
SH
U)
0
z
0'
EH ~
r-I E
a)
NCd.HUf
oNcoceomo qz Co N Ln N
0 m r m O LOOCn0 (L)N 00o o r-i r-i m N Ln qv Ln* 0 0 0 . 0 . . .
C* C S 5 So 0m m
OH r-3 LC) Nr-A 2m *-ql o to 0
0 00 0 00 00 00 H0r-0Lr-C0r- qql r- r- k.0 l - 0 c q 0r-i W-14LO n () r N Nr-q (Y)
r- N N N HHr- HH--r-q
r- CN (Y)4LT k0C-0 m D
1
4NJ.HH
4Jro
0)
4
0d
o
m
rI
0
rd
C
r
a>
H:
39
Ln)LC q3 LC HO r-i r-CN M
. .0.6.0.0
r-i C04 3 4c Lr)
. . .
40
after Waters and Crawford 1973). Annual production was
approximately 2.4 g m-2 for Procladius sp. and 6.0 g m-2
for T. decorus for a total of 8.4 g m-2. The production
estimate for the caenid mayflies was approximately 1.9 g
-2 -lm y . The total production for the three species was
-2 -l10.3 g9m y
Energy Metabolism
Effects of seasonally encountered temperatures (AT)
on respiration rates (R) and patterns of metabolic compen-
sation to them in Brachycercus sp., Procladius sp. and T.
decorus are shown in Figure 5 and Tables 10-15. Mean meta-
bolic rates are statistically compared (Fisher's t test
between species at each AT in Table 11. The effect of spe-
cies on variance of log-transformed weight specific rates
was significant (p<0.05; ANOVA) at all but the 10 and 15 C
AT (Table 12). Differences in mean rates among species
were reduced at 10, 15 and 20 C. Regression equations for
the relation of log dry weight (mg) with log respiration
rate ( 1 02 h~ ) are presented in Table 13. Regression co-
efficients at 10, 25, and 30 C for Brachycercus sp. and at
5, 10 and 20 C for T. decorus were significantly different
(p<0.05; Student's t test). Effects of variation in weight
within species on variation in weight-specific metabolic
rate was highly significant (p<0.01; ANCOVA; Table 14).
Weight-adjusted weight-specific metabolic rates at each AT
41
TABLE 11. Comparison* of metabolic rates** among threebenthic insects at six seasonal acclimatizationtemperatures.
Acclimatization/DeterminationTemperature
C(Date) zcIadius sp. T. decorus Brachycercussp.
2.0+2.8 3.1+2.4 2.3+1.4
(16; 2.1) (21;0.9) (26;3. 0)***
5 0.3+1.0. 1.4+1.5 1.6+1.4(1-4-74) (3;5.4) (3;1.8) (4;1.1)
10 1.7+1. 3 2.3+1.1 1.9+1.4
(3-1-74) (3;2.8) (3;1.7) (6;3.6)
15 1.3+1.3 1.6+5.5 2.5+1.6
(11-15-74) (2;2.2) (3;0.6) (3;1.2)
20 3.5+1.4 2.5+1.2 2.0+1.2(10-13-75) (4;2.1) (4;1.9) (4;2.5)
25 7.7+1.1 6.5+1.6 3.0+1.1(5-21-74) (2;0.3) (3;0.3) (5;5.2)
30 4.2+1.0 6.6+1.2 3.4+1.0(8-11-74) (2;1.7) (5;0.5) (4;6.2)
*means not underscoreddifferent (p Z-0.05, Fishers
by a common line are significantlyt-test).
**Rates not adjusted for weight difference among speciesor temperature groups (ul 02 mg- h-1 ).
***(N;wt) where N is the number of reaction vessels con-taining 10 insects of nearly equal sizes and wt is the meanmg dry wt of the 10 insects in each vessel.
42
TABLE 12. ANOVA for acclimatization metabolic rates amonthree species of benthic insects at six seasonalacclimatization temperatures.
Source Sum Degreesof of of Variance F PVariance__- Squares Freedom
5 CAmong
SpeciesWithinTotal
10 CAmong
SpeciesWithinTotal
15 CAmongSpecies
WithinTotal
20 CAmong
SpeciesWithinTotal
25 CAmong
SpeciesWithinTotal
35 CAmong
SpeciesWithinTotal
0.8646
0.13541.0001
0.0281
0.04280.0709
0.1165
1.13751.2540
0.1230
0.10840.2314
0.3485
0.09810.4467
0.1913
0.03830.2297
2
79
2
9
11
2
5
7
2
9
11
2
7
9
2
810
0.4323 22.3432* 0.0009
0.0193
0.0141 2.9602 0. 1028
0.0048
0.0583 0.2560
0. 2275
0.0615 5.1039* 0.0330
0. 0120
0.1743 12.4286*
0.0140
0.0957 19.9605*
0.0048
0. 0050
0.0008
*Significant (P < 0.05).
0.7837
4j-) -Hq~4-)-Cd
- r0)-H
0O C
ro)
0)C
HOUo
0 (d
-I-O)
I -H
4NJH
OUd0to
)4- -H
Cg
~4)0- -pi
H ,Q
4Qo
C
0)Cd -H E-1
H3 0)--
C-) -I-i4J
N-
H .CM
0
rd0-
0
to
0" 0
00
641
rI
0
4
to
00
0)
r-Ic
(Y)
s ro
CD
(N
0
0-
(3
0
'o
(N0
CD
0
00 D0
C:)
0
-'
O)0
C)0
0
CN (Y)0o 0(C)
o
0
r- ,
0
r)
(N
0-
0
0
(O)
.C)
H.
0
(N
0LO l
C 0
0
CNLO
0
(N
0 -s
01
0
r-'
qzl --,
On )
0 M
0
H
COr-I0
'o t0
0.)
to
0 0 0 0 0 0r- - -I C r- -I r -IC
) N' -- c -IC 0 -0 00 C H-IC
-m0) H) o o 0) C- ) -O.0') .0) .0 0 C:)0 : 0=
0. C * (N * 00e H * 0 e0:)0 C H 0 H H0 C
H H O 0 -)ri+ -- + -' + -- + -' + -' +'-
*401 0 4S
0 H 0 0 0 0CI I
E- U Lo 0-- r-I
LO 0 L() 0H (N (N C?)
:R:
0O
00 Q0
0
- 40H
C)H
0
CD -s
43
-H
H
0)
a)to
-- Q
o 'O
-H 0-4 00) 0)0- 04-
a)) 0 0)to ro
0 0) Q
-H r-4 043 0- 00d 0)
.H
--H
I4 ?) 00) C0-) 0 0
rO O
a)Cd
0 0
-r--4
0 - -
r-I- 4-4 -
H 0 -
4-4
0 H C
-H4-1
U C Z
-I -IC -I C
- IC -'K1
0n
00
0.HH
Cd4-Q)
0r
4-4 0
04 NW - r'H 'H04-)
4-)
-).riO 'H
Cd
OH
H Cd
SOrd0 Uc)
x~U)
'H- 4-)La,.C
U)
ro )
U)
4-1 -eO ..H0
4-)4-J
444-4ci)
4 X
4-44-~O.-> U)
0 0
S04-P
E-J
o m
OH00o. .0
'K
(NH
H OLr) Lr)
0 0
C0
H HHUl mqr L ()NL)r- r -I - H
00
(n00
0.
CN 10(N r-LO (Y)CN r-C .(NN
CY) rl Nr- o Lr)Nl 0) N0 (Y)Hcoo(Nc-i(N
0H>1141
Lo I a Lco -. I
0 r- - a) () r- -rq(1) 4-) 4 . 4 .4 4J)4
rclOHq rq 0 0 rqE-1 MQ E-
E54H
44
H000
0
r-1CD
chCD
00N
ooH
.N
0
'KLCCv(NH-i
.0
U)
Cd
oi
4-4ci)
o
CJ)U)
41 o 00N 00 01t o 'o cNH 0 0
H4 0 Hr
'H
-
(0rCd 44-4H- 1 -) 4 4'
O H-
aP4o
0
v
4-)
rd
44
'H
ri,)
H
-'H'K
0
rd
54(d
4-40
05,4
0Ui)
0
a)4-4
4.i-4'H
45
O4 0-) C )'Ii
-H .. d c)r- N L) C N4-0 -r (N -4Q4J r4 l Cl-rdd r
(D -Hr- -A
o -pCr00 I
WH C-) H -H
rdC*
r-ir:o
-P-
4Hp (D
(DW -rq C
LOC
ci)- ,N
CC
U) 4J
4J 0
-a d 4-C) N (N -H O
wH
4-i
(D 00 .o
0
-H o-H) 4-OC C 0L
O 0 06) C ) ::I
,N r- En a. a r-i
H' H l ,
a)ci) >
-L 4O J * *00 d
E- O4 (d 4--) 04rd
0 r4 0 V
Wci) *4
>-sW 0)J 4 ) dc-i a) m-40_ *0 P r Cd
4c) * OW
4-4i4J I WI a)EC-4 E-i PW md4
46
44 0
04-OLIn ra
a) r
0 0 IVO 004 .C.d. .
0 ri4 -H 4-);- j (4- C
SI . .1C)n C H H E O
(Y0(00.0 LO r:
440
- r--n0 .) HHH
r-I -H- N -p OH-P4 U)0 Cl)0 0
40dCd-H H Q P
U c) (N 00 4J ;C * * * -4 )0
H H 0 (d -r
4P .Cd .C C)HoU) co0 4j r-..p a)
-r,) OC -C )0Ua) 4-PrdCd H I ) (NJ4)PQ04 C(d riri o- aCd)) Iq -0
4J 0 0 0OI) C HqHVH O H-) H CdO
a) C. Ir41 H )O0 H
-H ICC4 ,: CU) U)U) C1::C0 4-* M0 )H * * N U)Q U)
Cd-4 CJN E-4 ) -P4J) (N)e 104C
OCI) C )1CnEn U)41 U)0
O 4- O
- i )4-C)H04 Ca) * U)
* O -P
OH * 01 n r- --401r
Ol u ) 4col.H CW dH(04J OH r -
-H- fUCj C-p
HU) 0.1 0Jo 0-da-r-4 Do-IH -) 10 u Ol (5 I ;z
(I u 1r- 4J -..
- -Hp
E- CC-d-H (
47
Fig. 5. Acute, weight-adjusted acclimatization R-Tcurves of three species of insect found in the NTSU golfcourse pond.
w
w
10 5
CC)
-x
2w
w
LLLI ___LL L 1 .10 0Ot-. 0 (PN
GD 16
w
*D*
04~ I-N Q "
-w
LlilL.LLf L .. Lvrmjjin 0 o0 N Q C1 0ID 0)CD Cq e CrA*~; -
49
are given in Table 15 and illustrated in Figure 5. Dif-
ferences between adjusted rates within species at different
temperatures were tested using Tukey's multiple range test
(Table 15). Interpolated values for the two chironomids
at 15 C are presented in parentheses and were used for Q
calculations (Table 16). Differences between 5 and 10 C
were especially great for Brachycercus sp. and Procladius
sp. At the time of the 15 C experiment, both chironomids
were emerging and only small numbers of each instar were
available. Consequently, large variations in size and
metabolic rates, and small N's produced large variances
in the data at 15 C. Therefore, values were interpolated
for Procladius sp. and T. decorus at 15 C.
Brachycercus sp. appeared to compensate from 10 to 20
(Q10 = 0.8) and from 25 to 30 C, (Q1 0 = 1.5) but not for
temperature changes from 5 to 10 (Q1 0 = 4.0) and from 20
to 25 C (Q1 0 = 4.2). Procladius sp. appeared to compensate
only between 25 and 30 C (Q10 = 0.6). T. decorus exhibited
a Q10 greater than 2.0 only between 5 and 10 C (Q10 = 2.7)
and appeared insensitive to temperature changes at all
other experimental temperatures.
Annual Energy Flow
Estimated annual energy flow (A = P + R) through the
three benthic insect populations is shown in Table 15.
Brachycercus sp. processed the most energy (C= 263 kcal m-2
y~1 ), although the estimated assimilation efficiency for
50
Brachycercus sp. was only 19% (A = 51 kcalrn2 y ). The
ratios of energy to total benthic production (P) and the
total energy of total benthic respiration (R), to assimila-
ted energy (A) were 51% and 49% respectively (P= 64 kcal
-2 -l -2 -l -2 -lm y , R + 62 kcal m y , A= 126 kcal m y ). Brachy-
cercus sp. used 78% of its A for respiration (R = 40 kcal
-2 -1m y ) and apportioned only 22 % into production of bio-
mass (P= 11 kcal m2yl). Procladius sp. and T. decorus
transformed much more energy of assimilation (A = 18 kcal
-2 -1 -2 -1m y , and 57 kcal m y , respectively, into production
-2 -l -2 -lof biomass (P = 13 kcal m y and 40 kcal m y ) than to
- 2 -1 -) -respiration (R =5 kcal m y and 17 kcal m'yl). The
ratio of P to R for the three populations is about 50%.
51
TABLE 17. Annual energy flow* in two species of midgelarvae and one species of mayfly nyph from thebenthos of a small pond ecosystem in north-centralTexas.
rl u enies Brachycerdus Total
C** 45 (10.7)
FU** 27 (6.5)
A 18 (4.2)
R 5 (1.0)
P 13 (3.2)
142 (33.4)
85 (19.9)
57 (13.5)
17.2 (3.9)
40 (9.6)
263 (62.8)
212 (50.7)
51 (11.9)
40 (9.4)
11 (2.5)
450 (107.1)
324 (77.1)
126 (30.0)
62 (14.7)
64 (15.3)
*IBP Notation.
Values are in kcal m-2 -1, kj m-2 -1
**Calculated from literature values: All other dataare empirical or are summed from empirical data (seeMethods and Materials for formulae).
52
DISCUSSION
Generally, a very low number of species was found on
any given sampling date. Recently, Driver (1977) concluded
that chironomid species diversity is directly related tothe stage of development of the plant community, which inturn is greatly affected by changes in water level. Thenumber of species present in the benthos in the NTSU pond
appears to have resulted from the effects of water fluctu-
ations and the mechanical and chemical removal of the algae
mat early in the study.
Trees contributed an unknown amount of energy into thebenthos. The littoral zone consisted primarily of leaf
detritus, among which were found more mayflies and chirono-
mids than in the other substrate types combined. The rela-tionship between temperature and fish predation and the
consequent effect on the benthic invertebrates will be dis-
cussed in the following section.
Population Dynamics
The benthic invertebrates exhibited several drastic
fluctuations in population densities and biomass in responseto several environmental factors. Drawdowns always reducedbiomass and numbers by effectively eliminating the littoralzone (Fig. 2b, Fig. 4). Fish predation on the benthos was
53
significant only when water temperature exceeded 15 C
(Jones 1975). This accounts for the inverse relationship
between the benthic population and temperature (Fig. 2a,
Fig. 4).
Environmental stresses affected population dynamics to
the extent that life histories of macroinvertebrate popula-
tions was obscured. However, generalized life histories
and probable trophic positions are available from the lite-
rature. The presence of only two species of chironomids
probably resulted from the drastic fluctuations in water
level (Driver 1977). T. decorus, a common chironomid in
warm, shallow, oxygen-deficient ponds, is a secondary pro-
ducer which feeds on algae and detritus. It often exhibits
a multivoltine life cycle in warm waters (Wirth and Stone,
in Usinger 1969). Procladius spp. are encountered in lakes
and ponds where prey items are abundant. It therefore fills
the trophic position of a secondary consumer. Pupae of
Procladius were encountered only from February 1973 through
March 1974 (Table 4), indicating the possibility of a uni-
voltine life cycle with a 4-month winter emergence. How-
ever, absence of pupae in the samples may be an artifact
of the lower population densities in warmer months. Annual
turnover ratios (TR) of both species are very high (Table
16), and a high TR is gemerally thought to be typical of
species which exhibit more than one generation per year
(Waters 1969, McClure and Stuart 1976).
54
Brachycercus sp. appears to be multivoltine with con-
siderable brood overlap. Clifford et al (1973) summarized
ephemeropteran life cycles on a latitudinal basis and sta-
ted that mayflies in the South should display that pattern.
However, Brachycercus sp. exhibited a low TR (Table 16)
which is characteristic of univoltine or bivoltine species
(e.g. Jonasson 1972, Kimerle and Anderson 1976). Brachy-
cercus sp. may be a detritivore. The largest numbers (more
than 60%) of this tiny mayfly were encountered in the leaf
detritus and other allocthanous material in the littoral
zone. Biomass and population densities (Fig. 3, g and h)
were severely disturbed by water fluctuations (Fig. 2a).
The effect of fish predation was the same as that observed
in the chironomids.
Production
Production estimates are notably higher than litera-
ture values (Table 16). Turnover ratios for T. decorus and
Procladius sp. are much higher than the reported range for
aquatic insects (2.5-5, Waters 1969), while the turnover
ratio for Brachycercus sp. is lower. Production rates are
direct reflections of complex interactions of environmental
factors and may vary considerably from year to year. There-
fore, until more long term averages are available (e.g.
Jonasson 1972) comparisons between species, localities,
habitats, etc., may not be very meaningful.
55
TABLE 18. Comparisons of secondary production in selectedpopulations of benthic invertebrates.
Species Trophic HabitatLevel
Chironomus anthracinus b Lake Esrom, Sweden
Tendipedes decorus b NTSU pond, Texas, USA
Baetis vernus d German river
Ephemerella subvaria d Minn. stream, USA
Deleatidium sp. a New Zealand river
Procladius sp. a NTSU pond, Texas, USA
Brachycercus sp. d NTSU pond, Texas, USA
Chironomus anthracinus b Uchinsk Res. USSR
Baetis bicaudatus d Mt. stream, Utah, USA
Baetis vagans d Valley Creek, Minn. USA
Procladius crassinervis a Loch Leven, Scotland
Procladius choreus a Loch Leven, Scotland
Glyptotendipes barbibes b Lagoon, Ore. USA
Procladius pectinatus a Lake Esrom, Sweden
Hexagenia limbata c Kansas Res. USA
Coroterpes mexicanus d Brazos R., Texas, USA
Psilotanypus rufovittatus a Loch Leven, Scotland
Procladius simplicistilus a Loch Leven, Scotland
*a = carnivorous chironomid, b = herbivorous chirono-mid, c = carnivorous mayfly, d = herbivorous mayfly.
56
TABLE 18 --Continued
Production Turnover Sourcemg m 2 y Ratio
12900 1.2 Jonasson 1972
6031 19.6 This study
5300 Illies 1974
3330 7.2 Waters and Crawford 1973
2820 2.7 Winterborn 1976
2449 19.8 This study
1920 1.6 This study
1800 2.3 Sokolava 1968
1400 Pearson and Kramer 1972
1100 9.7 Waters 1975
1059 2.2 Charles et al. 1975
896 3.3 Charles et al. 1975
532 8.5 Kimerle and Anderson 1971
500 1.9 Jonasson 1972
400"- Horst 1976
300 15.4 McClure and Stuart 1976
263 10.6 Charles et al. 1975
166 2.4 Charles et al. 1975
57
Energy Metabolism
Although some attention has been given to respiration
in chironomids (e.g. Jonasson 1972, McFarland and McClusky
1972, Erman and Helm 1970, Harp and Campbell 1973, Edwards
1975), I am not aware of any studies on Tendipes decorus or
southern species of Procladius. Respiration studies on
ephemeropterans are also rare. Kamler (1971) has reported
on Cleon dipteran from a pond in Poland, and Ulanski and
McDiffett (1972) have reported on Isonychia sp. (Baetidae)
and Stenonema fuscum (Heptigeniidae), with emphasis on di-
urnal variations in metabolic rates. I am not aware of
any respiration studies on mayfly nymphs from the family
Caenidae. Weight adjusted metabolic rates fall within the
ranges reported for these families. However, since caenid
nymphs are much smaller than any other mayfly family, high-
er weight specific rates were expected.
Comparisons of metabolic rates (Table 11 and 12) reveal
that differences in rates, and the effect of species differ-
ences on rates are reduced at 10- 15 and 20 C. In addition,
weight adjusted metabolic rates (Table 15, Fig. 5) and Q10
values calculated on weight adjusted rates, show that the
three species studied appear to exhibit some insensitivity
to temperature changes at the same "mid-range" temperatures
(Fig. 5), which are commonly encountered when numbers arid
58
individual biomass (growth) are increasing. This could be
of selective advantage to insect populations which are
significantly decreased by environmental pressures (i.e.
fish predation) which are closely correlated with increas-
ing temperature.
Reports of metabolic compensation (Precht et al.1955,
Precht 1958, Prosser 1974) in vertebrate and invertebrate
poikilotherms are common in the literature. A partial list
includes: Berg 1953, Korg 1954, Berg 1966, Bishop and
Gordon 1967, Newell and Pye 1970, Dunlap 1969, 1971, Fitz-
patrick et al 1971, 1972, Dame 1972, Fitzpatrick 1972a, b,
1973, Miller and Mann 1973. At present, there are few re-
ports of metabolic compensation in aquatic insects (Pattee
1955, Parhon 1909, Sayle 1928, Lawton 1971, Brown and Fitz-
patrick 1977), and many thermal ecologists (Bullock 1955,
Keister and Buck 1964, Vernberg and Vernberg 1969) have
concluded that the ability to metabolically compensate is
relatively poor in this large class.
Energy Flow
Population and community energetics of several benthic
insects are presented in Tables 18 and 19. Populations
with high assimilation efficiency appear to place more of
energy into metabolism (i.e. Numbers 1-5 average 64% of
A allocated to R). Brachycercus sp. appears to be an excep-
tion to this generalization, as is Procladius pectinatus
(Jonasson 1972). Species which exhibit a low A appear to
59
TABLE 19. Comparison of annual population energetics ofselected aquatic insects.
Species Studied Trophic Type of EcosystemLevel* and Location
Chironomus anthracinus b Oligotrophic Lake,(Chironomidae) Sweden
Glyptotendipes barbipes a Sewage lagoon,(Chironomidae) N.W., USA
"midges" b Florida river,(Chironomidae) S., USA
Tanypodinae Larvae a Large loch,(Chironomidae) Scotland
Chaoborus falvicans Oligotrophic lake,(Diptera, Chaoboridae) Sweden
Tendipedes decorus a Eutrophic pond,(Chironomidae) S.W., USA
Corydalus cornutus e River, S.W., USA(Meggloptera)
Procladius sp. a Eutrophic pond,(Chironomidae) S.W., USA
Brachycercus sp. d Eutrophic pond,(Ephemeroptera) S.W., USA
Procladius pectinatus Oligotrophic lake,(Chironomidae) Sweden
Pyrrhosoma nymphyla e Eutrophic ponds,(Odonata, Zygoptera) England
*a = carnivorous chironomid, b = herbivorous chironomid,c = carnivorous mayfly, d = herbivorous mayfly, e = aquaticcarnivore
60
TABLE 19--Continued
A
kcal
437
437
287
140
65
57
33
18
51
10
1
P
m-2 -lY
75
192
123
57
14
40
16.7
13
11
3
0.6
RSource
362
245
141
82
51
17
16
5
40
7
0.6
Jonasson 1972
Kimerle and Anderson 1972
Odum 1957
Charles et al. 1975
Jonasson 1972
This study
Brown and Fitz patriot 1978
This study
This study
Jonasson 1972
Lawton 1971
61
TABLE 20. Comparison of annual benthic community energetics.
Type of A P REcosystem SourceLocation kcal m- 2 -
Oligotrophic 532 100 432 Jonasson 1972lake, Sweden
Sewage lagoon 437 245 192 Kimerle and AndersonN.W., USA 1972
Georgia Pond 409 326 183 Welch 1967 (Cited byS.E., USA Welch 1976)
Florida River, 574 246 282 Odum 1957S.E., USA
Texas Pond 126 64 62 This studyS.W., USA
Small lake, 9 3 6 Welch 1976CanadianArctic
62
place more available energy into production (P) of bio-
mass.
The energy flow through the benthic insects in the
NTSU pond appears to be low when compared to data for other
benthic systems. Fluctuations in water level, intense fish
predation and the loss of the algal mat probably contributed
significantly to a low annual energy flow.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Berg, K. 1953. The problem of respiratory acclimation.Hydrobiologia 5:331-350.
Bishop, L.G. and M.S. Gordon. 1967. Thermal adaptation ofmetabolism in anuran amphibians. Pages 263-280 inC.L. Prosser, Molecular mechanisms of temperature adap-tation. AAAS, Washington, D.C.
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publish-ing Corp., New York. 1023 p.
Brown, Arthur V., 1974. Ecological energetics of the Dobsonfly, Corydalus cornutus. Ph.D. dissertation. NorthTexas State University, Denton, Texas.
Brown, A.V. and L.C. Fitzpatrick. 1977. Life history andpopulation energetics of the dobson fly. Ecology(In Press).
Bullock, T.H. 1955. Compensation for temperature in the me-tabolism and activity of poikilotherms. Biol. Rev.Cambridge Phil. Soc. 30:311-342.
Brylinsky, M. and L.H. Mann. 1973. An analysis of factorsgoverning productivity in lakes and reservoirs. Limnol.Oceanogr. 18:1-4.
Charles, W.N., K. East, and T.D. Murray. 1976. Productionof larval Tanypodinae (Insecta: Chironomidae) in themud at Loch Leven, Kinross, Scotland. Proc. R. Soc.Edinb., Sec. B. 75.3, 157-169.
Childress, W. Michael. 1977. Systems model of energy flowand trophic dynamics of a small North Central Texaspond ecosystem. M.S. Thesis, North Texas State Univer-sity, Denton, Texas.
Clifford, H.R., M.R. Robertson and K.A. Zelt. 1973. Life
cycle patterns of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) from somestreams of Alberta, Canada. Proc. 125 Internat. Conf.Ephemeroptera, 1970., 122-131.
Comita, G.W. 1972. The seasonal zooplankton cycles, pro-duction and transformation of energy in Severson Lake,Minnesota, Arch. Hydrobiol. 70:14-66.
63
64
Cummins, Kenneth W. and John C. Wuycheck. 1971. Caloricequivalents for investigations in ecological energetics.Multilunguen Communication No. 18, International Asso-ciation of Theoretical and Applied Limnology.
Cummins, Kenneth W. 1973. Trophic relations of aquaticinsects. Ann. Rev. Entomology. Vol. 18.
Dame, R.G. 1972. The ecological energies of growth, respi-ration and assimilation of the intertidal Americanoyster Crassostrea virginica. Marine Biol. 17: 243-250.
Driver, E.A. 1977. Chironomid communities in small prairieponds: some characteristics and controls. FreshwaterBiology 7, 121-133.
Dunlap, D.G. 1969. Influence of temperature and duration ofacclimation, time of day, sex and body weight on meta-bolic rates in the hylid frog, Acris crepitans. Comp.Biochem. Physiol. 31:555-570.
Dunlap, D.G. 1971. Acutely measured metabolic rate-temper-ature curves in the cricket frog Acris crepitans. Comp.Biochem. Physiol. 38A: 1-16.
Edwards, R.W. 1958. The relation of oxygen consumption tobody size and to temperature in the larvae of Chirono-mus riparius. J. Exp. Biol. 35:383-395.
Erman, Don C. and William T. Helm. 1970. Estimating oxygenconsumption from body lengths for some Chironomid Larva.Hydrobiologia Vol. 36, Issue 3-4-14 December.
Fisher, Z. 1966. Food selection and energy transformationin larvae of Lestis sponsa (Odonata) in astatic waters.Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 16:600-603.
Fitzpatrick, L.C. and J.R. Bristol. 1971. Ecological sig-nificance of thermal acclimation on metabolism and ener-getics in the salamanders Desmognathus fuscus and Des-mognathus ochrophaeus. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 52: 40(Abst.).
Fitzpatrick, L.C. 1973. Energy allocation in the AlleghenyMountain salamander Desmognatus ochrophaeus. Ecol.Monogr. 1:43.
Fitzpatrick, L.C., J.R. Bristol and R.M. Stokes. 1972.Temperature acclimation and metabolic rates in the duskysalamander Desmognathus fuscus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.41A:89-96.
65Fitzpatrick, L.C., J.R. Bristol and R.M. Stokes. 1971.Thermal acclimation and metabolism in the AlleghenyMountain salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Comp.Biochem. Physiol. 40A:681-688.
Gollop, J.B. 1965. Wetland inventories in Western Canada.pp. 249-264 in Int. Union Game Biol. Trans. XVI Congr.Bournemouth.
Hamilton, A.L. 1969. On estimating annual production. Lim-nol. Oceanogr. 14: 766-770.
Harp, George L. and R.S. Campbell, 1973. Respiration ratesof two midge species at different temperatures. Ark.Acad. Sci. Proc., Vol. 27: 49-50.
Herman, Dennis R. and Allen W. Knight. 1975. The influenceof temperature on the bioenergetics of the carnivorousstonefly nymph Acroneiria californica Banks (Plecoptera:Perladae) . Ecology 56:051-6
Host, T.J., G.R. Marzolg and K.E. Marshal. 1974. Productionecology of burrowing mayflies in a Kansas reservoir,XIX Congress of the International Association Limnology.Winnipeg, Canada.
Hynes, H.B.N. and Mary J. Coleman. 1968. A simple methodof assessing the annual production of stream benthos,Limnol. Oceanogr. Vol. 13, No. 4, October, 569-573.
Illies, J. 1974. A new attempt to estimate production inrunning waters. International Association of Theoreti-cal and Applied Limnology. Proceedings, Vol. 19,parts 1-4, Winnipeg- Manitoba, Canada:1705-1711.
Johannsen, O.A. 1905. Aquatic nematocerous diptera II.Chironomidae, Bull. N.Y. St. Mus., 86:76-331, pls. 16-37.
Johannsen, O.A. and H.K. Townes, Jr. 1952. Tendepedidae(Chironomidae). In Guide to the insects of ConnecticutPartlVI. Diptera. Fifth Fascicle. Midges and gnatspp. 1-148, 22 pls.
Jonasson, Petur M. Ecology and production of the profundalbenthos in relation to phytoplankton in Lake Esron.Oikos supplementum 14:1-148. Compenhagen, 1972.
Jones, Fred. 1975. Trophic dynamics of seven species offish in a small North Texas pond ecosystem. Master'sthesis. NTSU. Denton, Texas.
66
Jones, F.V., W.D. Pearson and L.C. Fitzpatrick. 1977. Pro-duction dynamics of seven fishes in a pond. Env. Biol.Fish. In Press.
Jones, F.V., W.D. Pearson and L.C. Fitzpatrick. 1977. Yieldestimates derived from active and passive creel surveysof a small pond fishery. Tex. J. Sci. In Press.
Kamler, E. 1971. Reactions of two species of aquatic in-sects to the changes of temperature and oxygen concen-tration. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 18,3:303-323.
Keister, M. and J. Buck. 1965. (Insects) respiration: someexogenous and endogenous effects on rate of respiration,p. 617-658, in The physiology of insects, Academic Press,New York, Vol. 3.
Kelly, Martin H. 1975. Primary production and communitymetabolism in a small north central Texas pond ecosystem.M.S. Thesis, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas.
Kimerle, Richard A. and N.H. Anderson. 1971. Production andbioenergetic role of the midge Glyptotendipes barbipes(Staeger) in a waste stabilization lagoon. Limnol.Oceanogr. 16:646-659.
Krog, J. 1954. The influence of seasonal environmentalchanges upon the metabolism, lethal temperature and rateof heart beat of Gammarus limnaeus (Smith) taken froman Alaskan lake. Biol. Bull. 107:397-410.
Lawton, J.H. 1971. Ecological energetics studies on larvaeof the damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer) (Odonata:Zygoptera). J. Anim. Ecol. 385-423. Bioener.
Lindeman, Raymond L. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect ofecology. Ecology 23: 399-418.
Margalef, R. 1963a. On certain unifying principles in eco-logy. Amer. Nat. 97:347-357.
McCauley, Victor J.E. 1974. Instar differentiation in lar-val Chironomidae. (Diptera). Can. Ent. 106:179-200.
McClure, Richard G. and Kenneth W. Stewart. 1976. Lifecycle and production of the Mayfly: 'Chorterpes (Neo-choroterpes) mexicanus AllenEphem eran:eptophlibi-lidea). Am. J. Ent.
McDiffett, W.F. 1970. The transformation of energy by astream detritivore., Pteronarcys scotti (Plecoptera)Ecology 51:975.
67McFarlane, A. and D.S. McClusky. 1972. The oxygen consump-tion rate of Chironomid larvae from Loch Leven in rela-tion to temperature. Coamp. Biochem. Physiol. 43A:991-1001.
Milbrink, Goran and T. Widerhoem. 1973. Sampling effi-ciency of four types of mud bottom samplers. Oikos24:479-482.
Miller, R.J. and K.H. Mann. 1973. Ecological energeticof the seaweed zone in a marine bay on the AtlanticCoast of Canada. III. Energy transformation by sea ur-chins. Marine Biol. 18:99-114.
Newell, R.C. and V.I. Pye. 1970. The influence of thermalacclimation on the relation between oxygen consumptionand temperature in Littorina littorea (L.) and Myti-lus edulis (L.) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 34:385-397.
Odum, E.P., C.E. Connell and L.B. Davenport. 1962. Popula-tion energy flow of three primary consumer componentsof old field ecosystems. Ecology 43:88-96.
Odum, E.P. 1968. Energy flow in ecosystems: A historicalreview. Am. Zoologist. 8:11-18.
Odum, H.T. 1957. Trophic structure and productivity ofsilver springs. Ecol. Monogr. 27:55-112.
Parhon, M. 1909. Les change nutritifs chex les abeillespendant les quatre saisons. Ann. Sci. Nat. (ser. 9)Zool. 9:1.
Pattee, E. 1955. Influence d'un changement de temperaturesur la consommation d'oxygene et phenomene d'accoutumancechex qualques larves aquatiques d'insects. Bull. Biol.Fr. Belg. 89:369-378.
Patten, Bernard C., David A. Egloff, Thelera H. Richardsen,et al., 1975. Total ecosystem model for a cove in LakeTexoma. In B.C. Patten (ed.), Systems Analysis andSimulation in Ecology. Vol. 3 Academic Press, N.Y.Pearson, W.D., and R.J. Kramer. 1972. Drift and productionof two aquatic insects in a mountainrstream. Ecol.
Monogr. 24:365-385.
Precht, H., J. Christophersen and H. Hensel. 1955. Tempera-tur und Leben. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 514 p.
Precht, H. 1958. The functions of temperature in the eco-logy of the perciod fish Girella nigricans (Ayres)Ecol. Monogr. 33:23-62.
68
Prosser, C.L. 1974. Comparative animal physiology. W.B.
Saunders, Philadelphis.
Roberts, J.L. 1967. Metabolic compensations for temperaturein sunfish. Pages 245-262 in C.L. Prosser, Molecularmechanisms of temperature adaptation. AAAS, Washington.
Sayle, M.H. 1928. Factors influencing the rate of metabo-lism of Aeschna umbrosa nymphs. Biol. Bull., WoodsHole, 54:212.
Schindler, W. and G.W. Comita. 1972. The dependence ofprimary production upon physical and chemical factorsin a small, senescing lake, including the effects of
complete winter oxygen depletion. Archiv. Hydrobiol.69:413-451.
Smith, G.A., L.C. Fitzpatrick and W.D. Pearson. 1974. Sea-sonal cycles of standing crops and energy metabolsimin microcrustacea in a North Central Texas pond. Amer.Zool. 14(4);1286 (Abst.)
Smith, A.G., J.H. Standt, and J.B. Gollop. 1964. Prairiepotholes and marshes, pp. 34-50. In Waterfowl Tomorrow.U.S. Dept. Interior, Washington, D.C.
Smith, George A. 1976. Population dynamics and energy flowin zooplankton in a small north central Texas pond.M.S. thesis, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas.
Smith, G.A. L.C. Fitzpatrick and W.D. Pearson. 1977. Meta-bolic rates in two copepods. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.In Press.
Sokolava, H.Y. 1968. Production of the Chironomids of theUchinsk reservoir. "The methods for the estimation of
production of aquatic animals." (Handbook and papers).Soviet National Committee of IBP of the Academy of Sci-ences of the U.S.S.R. Minsk, Part 2.
Southwood, T.R. 1966. Ecological methods with particularreference to the study of insect populations. Methuen,London, 391 pages.
Teal, John M. 1952. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystemof Georgia. Ecology 43:614-624.
Tilly, L.J. 1968. The structure and dynamics of Cove Spring.Ecol. Monogr. 38:169-197.
Tuckey, J.W. 1949. One degree of freedom for non-additivity.Biometrics 5:232-42.
Ulanski, James T. and Wayne F. McDiffet. 1972. Diurnal va-riations in respiration of mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera)Physiol. Zool. 43, 2:97-105.
Ussinger, Robert L. 1974. Aquatic Insects of California.University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Vernbert, F.J. 1969. Acclimation of intertidal crabs. Am.Zool. 9:333-341.
Vernbert, John F. and Winona B. Vernberg. Thermal influenceon invertebrate respiration. Chesapeake Science 10,3 and 4:234-240. September.
Vollenweider, R.A. 1969. A. manual on methods for measuringprimary production in aquatic environments. IBP Hand-book No. 12. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford.213 pp.
Wadley, F.M. 1952. Elementary sampling principles in ento-mology. U.S.D.A. Pl. Quar. Bur. Ent. 302, 17 pp.(Cited by T.R. Southwood. 1966. Ecological Methodswith Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Popu-lations. Chapman and Hall. London, page 21.)
Waters, T.F. 1969. The turnover ratio in production eco-logy of freshwater invertebrates. Am. Nat. 103,903:173-185.
Waters, Thomas F. and Gary W. Crawford. Annual productionof a stream mayfly population: A comparison of methods.Limnol. Oceanogr. Vol. 18,2:286.
Waters, T.F. 1966. Production rate, population density anddrift of a stream invertebrate. Ecology 47:595-604.
Welch, B.L. 1967. Energy flow through the major macroscopiccomponents of an aquatic ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation,University of George, Athens, Georgia.
Welch, Harold. 196r8. Relationships between assimilationefficiencies for aquatic consumers. Ecology 49: 755-759.
Welch, H.E. 1976. Ecology of Chironomidae (Diptera) ina polar lake. J. Fish. Res. Board of Canada. 33,2:227-247.
69
70Winterborn, N.H. 1974. The life histories, trophic rela-tions and production of Stenoperla prasina (Plecoptera)and Deleatidium sp, (Ephemeroptera) in a New Zealandriver. Freshwater Biology 4,6: 507-524.