25
Energy Management in Dow Chemical 26 May 2010, Beijing Ningke Peng

Energy Management in Dow Chemical · About Dow A diversified chemical company, harnessing the power of science and technology to improve living daily founded in Midland, Michigan

  • Upload
    ngodat

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Energy Management inDow Chemical

26 May 2010, BeijingNingke Peng

About Dow

A diversified chemical company, harnessing the power of science and technology to

improve living daily

founded in Midland, Michigan in 1897

annual sales of $58 billion

52,000 employees

3,900+ in China and growing daily

supplies more than 5,000 products

serve customers in 160 countries

a company committed to sustainability

24 sites and offices in China

Dow’s Energy UseDow is among the largest Industrial Energy Consumers

Annual Energy Consumption Globally ≈ 600 Trillion Btu’s (22 million tons of coal

equivalent)

The Cost of Energy in 2009 Approached US $2.5 Billion Globally (~17 billion RMB)

Freeport

Plaquemine

Stade

Terneuzen

St Charles

Operations

Fort

Saskatchewan

Dow Central

Germany

Bahia Blanca

All Other Sites

Tarragona

Seadrift

Aratu

Energy Intensity Performance

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Btu

/lb.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Cum

ulative $ Billions S

avings

Cumulative Savings (B$) Total Actual Energy

5970

4776

EH&S Goal: 20% Improvement in Btu/lb.

Actual: 22 % Improvement through 2005

Goal line

$ 4.3 Billion

Dow’s Energy Performance

(~33 billion RMB)

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Corporate Commitment

OrganizationalStructure

Energy Reporting

EmployeeCommunications

Implementation Methodology

Goals & Compensation

Senior LeadershipSupport

Key Elements for an Effective Energy Efficiency & Conservation

Management Program

-

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Corporate Commitment:

Provides the Overall Commitment to EE&C

Establishes Energy Efficiency & Conservation as a

Corporate Objective

Defines Company Values to Stakeholders

Dow Corporate Environmental Advisory Council

Establishes Expectations for LeadersEnergy Efficiency& Conservation

Corporate Commitment

The Dow Public Report

Enhanced Public Reporting

www.dowpublicreport.com

Public Commitment:

In 1995 Dow Committed:

•To Reduce Energy Intensity

•By 20% by the year 2005

•From Base Year 1994

We will further reduce our global energy intensity by 25% from 2005- 2015

We will reduce our GHG emissions intensity by 2.5 % per year thru 2015

“No one in the world is more intensely

aware of the need, ultimately, to reinvent

our dependency on oil and natural gas

than we are… We will lead the way on

energy transformation because we have to.

And we have taken important steps already.”

-- Andrew Liveris

Chairman, CEO & President

The Dow Chemical Company

Corporate Commitment to 2015 Goals

Liveris Launches 2015 Sustainability Goals

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Senior Leadership Support :

Sets Overall Long Range Goals

Establishes Priority

Provides Resourcing and Funding

Establishes Performance Accountabilities

Visibly Models Action

Leads Advocacy and Champions EE&C

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Senior LeadershipSupport

Driving Energy Efficiency at DowOrganizational Structure:

Implementation Leader(s)

Implementation Teams

Energy Teams Networks

Roles & Responsibilities

Implementation:

Develops Management Systems

Establishes Implementation Model

Develops Specific Plans to Achieve

Goals

Identify Energy Saving Opportunities

Implement EE&C Projects

Monitor and Report Progress

Promotes EE&C Culture Locally

Leverages Success

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

OrganizationalStructure

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

EE&C

Global

Leader

Business A

EE Leader

Business B

EE Leader

Business C

EE Leader

Business D

EE Leader

Business E

EE Leader

Site 1

EE Leader

Plant A 1 Plant B 1 Plant C 1 Plant D 1 Plant E 1

Site 2

EE Leader

Plant A 2 Plant B 2 Plant C 2 Plant D 2 Plant E 2

Site 3

EE Leader

Plant A 3 Plant B 3 Plant C 3 Plant D 3 Plant E 3

Site 4

EE Leader

Plant A 4 Plant B 4 Plant C 4 Plant D 4 Plant E 4

Site 5

EE Leader

Plant A 5 Plant B 5 Plant C 5 Plant D 5 Plant E 5

Organizational Structure:

Site Teams

Business Teams

• Charter

• Leadership

• Membership

• Plans

• Roles

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Energy Measurement & Reporting Systems:

Robust Energy Accounting System

Metering Program

Sub-metering

Energy Conversion to Common Btu’s; Btu’s/lb

Drill Down Capabilities:

Business / Site / Plant / Facility / Equipment

Converts Data to Useful Information

Available to all Leaders and Employees

Basis for Monitoring and Reporting Progress

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Measurement& Reporting

Energy Intensity (BTU/LB)

3,600

3,650

3,700

3,750

3,800

3,850

3,900

3,950

4,000

4,050

4,100

Total 4,052 3,894 3,927 3,950 3,949 3,937 3,914 3,773 3,821 3,868 3,833

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3

2004 2005 2006

Global Asset Utilization Reporting System

Example : Fuel Gas Cost and Consumption

Cost

($/ lb)

Usage

(BTU/lb)

Best-in-class

Fuel Gas

0.00Site Sitte Site Site Site Site Site Site

Yr 2001

Yr 2002

1H 2003

Fuel Gas Consumption

(all forms)

Yr 2001 Yr 2002 1Q 02 2Q 02 3Q 02 4Q 02 1Q 03 2Q 03

(Btu / lbProduced)

SitteSitte

Example : Energy Intensity Reporting System

De-Pyramided Energy Intensity Performance

Goal 25% Reduction by 2015

5,6665,547

5,363 5,4125,584

2,266

2,766

3,266

3,766

4,266

4,766

5,266

5,766

6,266

6,766

Base

Year

2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

BT

U's

/ l

b

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

120%

% I

mp

rov

em

en

t

Energy Intensity (BTU's/lb) Goal Line 2015

(BTU/LB)

Site Tool for Individual Plants

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Improvement Methodology:

To Identify Defects –

Energy Waste

Inefficiency

Sub-Optimized Systems

Enables Finding Optimum Solutions

Corrects the Defect

Establish a Control Plan to Sustain the Gains

Integrated into Capital Program

Internal and/or Externally Assisted Energy Assessments

Long Range Listing of Opportunities / Projects

Continuous Improvement Mindset

Consider Six Sigma Approach

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Improvement Methodology

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Employee Communication Systems:

System(s) That Facilitate Sharing or Communication of :

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Goals

Performance Reporting

Challenges & Success Stories

EE&C Tools and Best Practices

Benchmark Information

Promotes Involvement & Recognizes Successes

Messages from Leadership Team

System that is easy to access – Consider Web based

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Communication Systems

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Goals and Compensation:

To Help Drive Accountability Throughout the

Organization

Set Challenging Annual Goals Corporate Goals

Business Goals

Site Goals

Plant Goals

Team Goals

Individual Goals

Link to Compensation :

Compensation Linked to Goal Attainment &

Performance

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Goals & Compensation

Driving Energy Efficiency at Dow

Energy Efficiency& Conservation

Reaching Beyond the Fence:

Dept of Energy – “Save Energy Now”

Energy Star’s – Industrial Energy Star Program

Texas Industries of the Future – Programs, Texas

Show Case

Alliance to Save Energy

ACEEE

American Chemistry Council

NAM, Others

Dow Solutions - Impact to Dow

Sustained Drive to Energy Intensity Reduction Since 1990 over 38% reduction

Since 1994:

Cumulative Energy Savings = Approx 1,700 Trillion Btu’s

More than enough energy to provide power to all the residential and commercial users in

California for a full year

Equivalent to 60 million tons of coal saved.

Cumulative avoided GHG ( CO2 equi) emissions of ~ 90 Million MT

Cost Savings (avoided fuel) = Over $ 9 Billion (>61 billion RMB)

Demonstrated Long-Term Effectiveness of our Program

Added Value to Corporate Reputation

Positions us for even further, more ambitious Goals

Dow Solutions – Impact to the Planet

One square foot of Styrofoam (one inch thick) will save one ton of CO2 emissions

over the average lifespan of a home

Our Results

Efficiency and The Triple Bottom Line

Good for Business:

Saves Money, Enhances Global

Competitiveness, Preserves Jobs,

Creates Prosperity for Shareholders

Good for the Environment:

Fewer GHG Emissions, Part of the

Solution to Global Climate Change

Good for Society: Reduces

Demand, Lowers Energy Bills,

Promotes Energy Security

Thank You

Back up Slides

How were the Results in Energy Efficiency Obtained?

Facility Efficiency improvement 9%

Product Mix / Merger & Acquisition Activity - not covered above 5%

Energy Power & Utility Efficiency Improvement power / steam supply 5%

Sub Total 19%

High Payback Energy Efficiency Projects --- %

Focused Engineering/Most Effective Technology Efficient Solutions + %

Focused Maintenance/Operations/Energy Teams + %

Total 22+%

+ No precise metrics on this - based primarily on Six Sigma and energy team activities

1995 to 2005 Results

Examples of Energy Efficiency Projects

Replace aging power co-generating assets with state of the art assets – going from a

9000+ HR to 6100 HR

Finding a solution, then leveraging across the company:

GT brush seal designs

Variable speed drives

Site integration optimization

New design standards for evaluating pipe size vs pump size, insulation, etc.

New technologies for producing products that help others enhance their energy

efficiency

Six sigma tools to optimize asset operations.

Six sigma is a process improvement methodology using data and statistical analysis to

identify, fix or improve opportunity areas

Recovering by-product hydrogen and using as fuel