38
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Technical Physics (ITEP) www.kit.edu Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT Smart Energies Grid Lab in the MW range Jörn Geisbüsch

Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association

Institute for Technical Physics (ITEP)

www.kit.edu

Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT Smart Energies Grid Lab in the MW range Jörn Geisbüsch

Page 2: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 1 Energy Lab 2.0

o Large-scale research infrastructure to investigate future energy systems based on renewable energies.

o Embedded in Helmholtz Research programs „Renewable Energies“, „Energy efficient materials“ and „Storage and cross-linked Infrastructure“.

o Combines experiments with multi-scale simulation and big data.

o Investment from 2015-2017: 22 Mio. €* no manpower

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 3: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 2

Scientific Questions

o How can we compensate the role of decreasing availability of grid synchronized unloaded on-demand power generation ("spinning reserve") by energy system services based on decentralized components?

o How can we achieve this by establishing a parallel energy information network? What kind of information grid is necessary for this task?

o What are the appropriate grid topologies for a scenario of mainly decentralized power generation from renewable sources?

o How can we discover and effectively exploit load flexibility in integrated decentralized energy networks? (power - gas - heat - ...)

EnergyLab 2.0

Page 4: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 3

Energy Lab 2.0 components: Green indicates existing infrastructure (bioliq facility, PV field, consumer), Orange indicates components of the plant network; blue (respectively, red) indicates external facilities which are integrated via information communication technology links.

Interaction of different components

Photovoltaics field (KIT)

Flash Pyrolysis

HP - Gasifier HTHP Gas - Cleaning +

Conditioning

HP - Gas Turbine + Generator

Synthesis

Storage Electrical

Electrochemical Chemical

Thermal

Electrical Power

Grid

Biomass &

Low - grade Fuels

Fuels / Chemicals

MW Electrolysis Facility (FZJ)

Thermal Storage (DLR)

Consumers Buildings

Experimental Plants

Wind park (partner)

Geothermal facility

(partner)

Smart Energy System Simulation and Control Center

- Smart Grid Lab and R eal - Time Simulation (PHIL) - Microgrid with Grid Control

Plant N etwork

EnergyLab 2.0

Page 5: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 4

Existing Infrastructure Bioliq Plant 1 MVA Photovoltaic experimental field

KIT as prosumer Energy Smart Home Laboratory

Energy Lab 2.0

Campus North o 4500 employees o 21 MW peak load o 120 MWh/a

o 2 MW fast pyrolysis o 5 MW synthesis gas o 150 kg/h dimethylether

Page 6: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 5

Planned Infrastructure

Gas Turbine 3 MWth / 1 MWel

Thermal Energy Storage

1 MW Battery Storage

Jet Fuel Synthesis

Sour

ce: Y

ouni

cos

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 7: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 6

Location at KIT

Building

Field

1 MW Photovoltaic Experimental Field

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 8: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 7

Location at KIT

Building

Field

1 MW Photovoltaic Experimental Field

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 9: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 8 Energy Lab 2.0

Energy Lab 2.0 - Layout

1 MVA (5x200 kVA) system

Halle West “PHIL”

North

South

View from ceiling – 2. floor

Page 10: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 9

Control, monitoring and visualization center

Combines own research solutions with commercial control center software and a Smart Grid communication infrastructure Integrates grid lab hardware and external technical plants Should look like a real grid control center for operators Research on new control center software components and architectures, newer communication technology and risks, tools for demand side management, demand response, grid utility operations

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 11: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 10

Smart energy system control laboratory

3Ph+N

3Ph

drai

n

sour

ce

1. Tuning of simulation models

2. Experiments at the edge of or even beyond stability

3. Educational laboratory

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 12: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 11

Microgrid and Real-time Simulation

Energy Lab 2.0

1 MVA

1 MVA

Page 13: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 12

Microgrid and Real-time Simulation

Energy Lab 2.0

1 MVA

1 MVA

Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop training station in first operation since July 2015

Page 14: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 13 Energy Lab 2.0

Microgrid Switching Matrix

Device/Appliance pool

Transmission line pool

Switching matrix

PLC

Figure courtesy of J.Isele

Inter-connection of different operating resources and equipment

Page 15: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 14

e.g. adjacent grid

e.g. bulk consumer or wind farm

Combined operation: Microgrid - PHIL Preliminary layout considerations

PHIL Real-Time Simulator

Power amp 1

Power amp 3

Power amp 2

Grid control unit

Energy Lab 2.0

Strong synergies from combined approach

Incorporated into switching

matrix

Incorporated into switching

matrix

Page 16: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 15

Energy grids simulation and analysis lab

Topic 1: Electricity Grids E-Grid Modeling, Simulation & Analysis, measurements and monitoring in the microgrid (E.DR: up to 12.8 kHz) and at KIT, Co-Simulation E-Grid weather data Additionally: E-Transmission Grid BW, Germany, Europe => Scenario 2050 Germany & Europe

Topic 2: Heat / (Natural) Gas / Air 3D-building and – area models + gas / heat grids (CityGML, gbXML, IFC), co-simulation buildings heating, semantic modeling, standardization work within OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium)

Topic 3: Databases Generic data services, Data-Life-Cycle Lab, energy data archiving & retrieval, data-security & procedures

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 17: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 16

Energy Lab 2.0 - Timeline Gantt Chart

Example: Power-hardware-in-the-Loop timeline

Start of bidding process

Start of ordering process

Start of commissioning

process Lab up and

running

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 18: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 17

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 19: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 18

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 20: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 19

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 21: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 20

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 22: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 21

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 23: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 22

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 24: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 23

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 25: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 24

Energy Lab 2.0 Preliminary summary

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 26: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 25

Energy Lab 2.0 pathfinder PHIL training station @ ITEP-KIT

Photo von Testsand

Main purposes:

o Familiarization with system components

o Early identification of challenges and their solutions

o Staff training o Student lab

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 27: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 26

PHIL Group @ ITEP-KIT

Current group members (in alphabetical order): Jörn Geisbüsch (project manager) Frank Gröner (technician) Sebastian Hubschneider (IEH partner) Dustin Kottonau (test station coordination) Philip Kreideweis (master student) Christian Lange (chief engineer) Prof. Dr. Ing. Mathias Noe (head)

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 28: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 27

PHIL training station: Real-Time Digital Simulator

Host and workstation PCs: Linux and Windows (OSs), Quad-core systems (CPUs)

Images courtesy of Opal-RT

Software solution: HYPERSIM

Compute hardware @ present: 6 cores with up to 3.45 GHz each (one licensed @ present, upgradable) Analog Input: 32 channels (16-bit, 0.5 MSP/s) Analog Output: 16 channels (16-bit, 1 MPS/s) Digital Input: 32 channels (10 MPS/s) Digital Output: 32 channels (40 MPS/s)

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 29: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 28

PHIL training station: Power amplifier system

Present hardware:

(2x) 3-channel 4-quadrant power amplifier(s) from Spitzenberger&Spies

Technical specifications:

o Power output: up to 3x5 kVA

(soon 6x5kVA) o Frequency range:

0 – 25 kHz (-3 dB) o Voltage:

± 382V

(2x)

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 30: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 29 Energy Lab 2.0

PHIL training station – Commissioning First test runs

RL load in the Loop with simulated internal resistive load

Voltage drop over Rsim

Square-wave voltage

Sine-wave voltage

Page 31: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 30

PHIL training station – Commissioning Interface developments –Stability issues

Simple realization of Ideal Transformer Model (ITM) algorithm leads to catastrophic positive feedback when:

Zsim ≥ Zload

RL load

Improving algorithmic stability of ITM by subsequent calculation of impendance Ztotal at high SNRs

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 32: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 31

PHIL training station - Commissioning Time delays and signal run times

Causes for time delays: • Simulation compute times and

RTS time stepping • Power amplification • Measurement system

Total time delay over closed loop of approx. 40 µs (with RTS time steps of 5 µs)

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 33: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 32

PHIL training station - Commissioning Time delay - Power amplifier contribution

Amplifier unit: • Time delay

depends on absolute power amplification

• Common time delays by unit: 4-10 µs

Page 34: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 33

First implementation of a measurement (transducer) unit for early operation testing

PHIL training station – Commissioning Time delays - Measurement system

Time delay of measurement system only: 3-8 µs

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 35: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 34

OPAL-RT Simulator:

15 µs (3 time steps)

Power amplifier unit:

4-10 µs

Measurement system:

~3-8 µs

Total signal run time: ≥ 25 µs

CPU: 6 cores, 1 licensed

PHIL Test stand – Commissioning Time delays and signal run times

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 36: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 35

PHIL training station - Commissioning Noise

Noise source: Mainly high frequency induced power noise (σ~0.025 A)

Effective measurement range of 6 A

Noise reduction: Improvement of electromagnetic shielding and implementation of galvanic isolation between channels on the low voltage side

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 37: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 36

PHIL training station - Scaled grid Power grid modelling

Grid modelling involves: o Load flow calculations o Short circuit tests o Switching operations o Status data at grid nodes

Scaled grid enables high-voltage grid modelling under controlled but fairly realistic conditions

Scaled resistive SFCL

Energy Lab 2.0

Page 38: Energy Lab 2.0 @ KIT...amp 2 Grid control unit Energy Lab 2.0 Strong synergies from combined approach Incorporated into switching matrix Incorporated into switching matrix 15 KIT Energy

KIT Energy Center 37

Conclusions

o Commissioning of training station is under way and functionality meets expectations

o Training station is of high value to gain first practical experiences with system operation for staff and students

o Realization of Energy Lab 2.0 is under way and in time to be finished in mid 2018

o Energy Lab 2.0 represents a unique power grid and smart energies infrastructure

Energy Lab 2.0