Upload
duongdang
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Energy for what and for whom? Energy grabbing, power dynamics and alter(n)atives to the energy models
Alfons Pérez ([email protected]) Observatori del Deute en la Globalització (www.odg.cat)
21/06/2013 6th UPC International Seminar on Sustainable Technology Development
Towards sustainable energy systems - community participation
Democratising energy for development
Energy for what and for whom? 2
Energy • Cosmovisions and energy • Social Energetic Metabolism • Geopolitics of energy
Energy Grabbing • EU dependency and EU energy security • Energy Grabbing concept • 50 years of Energy Grabbing in Nigeria • Power dynamics in Energy Sector
Alter(n)atives • Questions and answers
www.odg.cat
Production
Renawables
Kwh
Supply
CO2 Energy Efficiency
Geopolitics
Rights and justice
Impacts
Energy grabbing
Power dynamics
Transnational corporations
Energy for what and for whom? 3
Production
Renawables
Kwh
Supply
CO2 Energy Efficiency
Geopolitics
Rights and justice
Impacts
Energy grabbing
Power dynamics
Transnational corporations
Energy • Cosmovisions and energy • Social Energetic Metabolism • Geopolitics of energy
Alter(n)atives • questions and answers
www.odg.cat
Energy Grabbing • EU dependency and EU energy security • Energy Grabbing concept • 50 years of Energy Grabbing in Nigeria • Power dynamics in Energy Sector
Mayas: ÓOL will, mood, intention, desire, intent, moral energy. Quechua: Samai, vital energy Japanese tradition (Chi in China – Prana in India) REIKI: link and harmonize internal and external flow Miskitos (Nicaragua): dance is the source of energy. Transmission of energy is the collective dance. Mapuches: “Newén”, vitality of every single animated thing Sources of energy are: sea, flat, mountains, forests and valleys.
Physics: Energy is the capacity of a physical system to perform work.
Energy in different Cosmovisions 5
Industrialized societies Vernacular, Organic Societies
“the equivalence of the two forms was not suspected by people in the eighteenth century”
Dieter Helm, “Peak oil and energy policy – a critique”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2011, pp.68–91 [p.74].
Multiple, incommensurable
Energies (use of)
Interchangeable, quantifiable (kwh)
Energy (abstract)
Energy in different Cosmovisions 6
Raw materials
Energy
Emis
sio
ns
Manufactured goods and services
Waste
Social energetic metabolism has significant geopolitical implications
Social energetic metabolism and geopolitical implications 7
Energy Social metabolism and geopolitical implications 8
Source: Oil trade movements, British Petrolium, 2011
Energy for what and for whom? 9
Energy • Cosmovisions and energy • Social Energetic Metabolism • Geopolitics of energy
Energy Grabbing and Power dynamics • EU dependency and EU energy security • The concept of Energy Grabbing • 50 years of Energy Grabbing in Nigeria • Power dynamics in Energy Sector
Alter(n)atives • Questions and answers
www.odg.cat
Production
Renawables
Kwh
Supply
CO2 Energy Efficiency
Geopolitics
Rights and justice
Impacts
Energy grabbing
Power dynamics
Transnational corporations
The external dimension of the EU energy security 10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYDavH4rh-Y
Energy Grab Video
NET ENERGY IMPORTS (imports-exports)
GROSS CONSUMPTION
(Gross inland consumption + international marine Bunkers)
ENERGY DEPENDENCY (%) =
ED < 0 % Net exporter ED > 0 % Net importer ED > 100 % Net Importer + stock
DINAMIC GRAPH (EU energy in figures Statistical pocket 2012) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlpxBQmQwZCMdGc5MHVoRXpOQWJTdnd4TU52Zjl5b2c#gid=5
The external dimension of the EU energy security 11
All Fuels
Consist of hard coal and derivatives, lignite and derivatives, peat and derivatives, petroleum (crude oil) and petroleum products (such as LPG, refinery gas, motor spirit, kerosene, gas/diesel oil, residual fuel oil), natural gas, manufactured gases, derived heat, renewable energies (such as hydro power, wind energy, biomass, wastes, geothermal energy), electrical energy and nuclear power.
Energy Intensity
It is defined as the ratio of gross inland consumption of energy to gross domestic product.
The tonne of oil equivalent (toe) is a unit of energy: the amount of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil, approximately 42 GJ
The external dimension of the EU energy security 12
Source: EU Energy in figures, Statistical Pocket Book 2012
The external dimension of the EU energy security 13
Source: EU Energy in figures, Statistical Pocket Book 2012
The external dimension of the EU energy security 14
Source: EU Energy in figures, Statistical Pocket Book 2012
The external dimension of the EU energy security 15
Source: EU Energy in figures, Statistical Pocket Book 2012
EU-27 DP (2010)= 52.7 %
Energy resources Benefits and revenues
Destruction and degradation of ecosystems Land loss Forced migration
Human rights, Cultural rights, Social rights, Economic rights
Accumulation by Dispossession (privatization, financialization, etc…)
ENERGY GRABBING
Exploration, Exploitation, Transport, Distribution, Offsetting
Grab of land
Grab of resources
Grab of rights
Grab of access to/use
NET ENERGY IMPORTS (imports-exports)
GROSS CONSUMPTION
(Gross inland consumption + international marine Bunkers)
ENERGY DEPENDENCY (%) =
Energy grabbing 16
ENERGY MODEL
-External dimension-
Cost-benefits Analysis
Lack of
regulation/deregulation/legal asymmetries
Authoritarian regimes
Corruption, impunity
Where?
Treaty of Lisbon (december 2007): main targets: combat climate change, reduce external vulnerability of the EU from imported fossil fuels and promote growth and employment.
Nov. 2008: Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan
“For example, the EU is projected to remain dependent on imported energy - oil, coal and especially gas – for many years to come. Europe's indigenous production of fossil fuels is declining. As a result, net imports of fossil fuels are expected to stay at roughly today's levels in 2020 even when the EU's climate and energy policies are fully implemented.”
• Diversify suppliers (Russia)
• Increasingly important role of Africa in the EU energy security,
• EIB and EBRD and other financial institutions to mobilise large-scale funding, in particular for cross-border projects.
The external dimension of the EU energy security 17
Ofensive External dimension portfolio
Investment: Nabuco west gas pipeline 2011 estimated cost €12–15 billion
Most relevant projects 18
Investment : €400bn (until 2050) Desertec plan to take solar power from the Sahara to southern Europe
Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project US$100bn
refurbishing a hydroelectric
4.800MW Hydro -Katanga mining-
40.000MW Grand Inga
capacitiy of 16 bcm up to 30bcm
The length of the pipeline would be 4,128 kilometres (2,565 mi): 1,037 kilometres (644 mi) in Nigeria, 841 kilometres (523 mi) in Niger, and 2,310 kilometres (1,440 mi) in Algeria The annual capacity of the pipeline would be up to 30 billion cubic meters of natural gas. It would have a diameter of 48 to 56 inches (1,220 to 1,420 mm) The pipeline is expected to be operational by 2015.
Trans-Saharan gas pipeline US$10 billion PIPELINE + US$ 3 billion gas gathering centers
Most relevant projects 19
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
An
gola
Ben
in
Bo
tsw
ana
Bu
rkin
a Fa
so
Cam
ero
on
Co
ngo
Co
te d
'Ivo
ire
DR
Co
ngo
Erit
rea
Eth
iop
ia
Gab
on
Gh
ana
Ken
ya
Leso
tho
Mad
agas
car
Mal
awi
Mau
riti
us
Mo
zam
biq
ue
Nam
ibia
Nig
eria
Sen
egal
Sou
th A
fric
a
Sud
an
Tan
zan
ia
Togo
Uga
nd
a
Zam
bia
Zim
bab
we
Oth
er A
fric
a
Sub
-Sah
aran
Afr
ica
Alg
eria
Egyp
t
Lib
ya
Mo
rocc
o
Tun
isia
No
rth
Afr
ica
Afr
ica
Electrification rate (%) 2011
SOURCE: IEA, World Energy Outlook 2011
Energy grabbing in the Niger Delta for 50 years 20
Human Development Index (HDI)a
Life expectancy at birth
Mean years of schooling
Expected years of schooling
value (years) (years) (years) HDI rank 2010 2010 2010 2010b VERY HIGH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
1 Norway 0,938 81,0 12,6 17,3 2 Australia 0,937 81,9 12,0 20,5 3 New Zealand 0,907 80,6 12,5 19,7 4 United States 0,902 79,6 12,4 15,7 5 Ireland 0,895 80,3 11,6 17,9 6 Liechtenstein 0,891 79,6 10,3 14,8 7 Netherlands 0,890 80,3 11,2 16,7 8 Canada 0,888 81,0 11,5 16,0 9 Sweden 0,885 81,3 11,6 15,6
10 Germany 0,885 80,2 12,2 15,6 (…)
LOW HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 140 Comoros 0,428 66,2 2,8 10,7 141 Lesotho 0,427 45,9 5,8 10,3 142 Nigeria 0,423 48,4 5,0 8,9
Energy grabbing in the Niger Delta for 50 years 21
Source: World Bank Data
15
11
28
.12
09
10
35
74
.17
13
89
73
9.3
09
12
85
44
3.0
59
39
72
39
7.6
12
4
70
57
2.6
56
94
56
48
5.8
94
44
51
99
8.9
07
83
51
62
8.5
99
57
49
35
9.8
66
92
46
62
2.9
02
52
46
61
1.9
75
1
0 14
55
.83
55
73
14
43
.20
95
91
24
1.7
86
85
65
19
8.7
08
73
72
0 24
1.7
86
85
65
19
8.7
08
73
72
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1600001
Mo
nac
o
2 L
uxe
mb
ou
rg
3 B
erm
ud
a
4 N
orw
ay
5 Q
atar
6 S
wit
zerl
and
7 D
en
mar
k
8 M
acao
SA
R, C
hin
a
9 A
ust
ralia
10
Sw
ed
en
11
Ne
the
rlan
ds
12
Un
ited
Sta
tes …
13
6 N
icar
agu
a
13
7 N
iger
ia
13
9 In
dia
14
0 P
apu
a N
ew G
uin
ea …
18
6 B
uru
nd
i
18
7 C
on
go, D
em. R
ep.
GDP - 2010
Energy grabbing in the Niger Delta for 50 years 22
137 Nigeria 1443,209591$
0102030405060708090
100
Gini Coefficient (2006)
104 Nigeria 50,6
Source: World Bank Data
Source: CIA World Factbook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3A-tLtqM8YU
Energy grabbing in the Niger Delta for 50 years 23
Energy for what and for whom? 24
Energy • Cosmovisions and energy • Social Energetic Metabolism • Geopolitics of energy
Alter(n)atives • Questions and answers
www.odg.cat
Energy Grabbing • EU dependency and EU energy security • Energy Grabbing concept • 50 years of Energy Grabbing in Nigeria
• Power dynamics in Energy Sector
Production
Renawables
Kwh
Supply
CO2 Energy Efficiency
Geopolitics
Rights and justice
Impacts
Energy grabbing
Power dynamics
Transnational corporations
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
Rel
ian
ce In
du
stri
es (
Ind
ia)
End
esa
SA (
spai
n)
Ro
snef
t O
il (R
uss
ia)
LUK
OIL
(R
uss
ia)
RW
E A
G (
Ger
man
y)
Ch
ina
Pet
role
um
(C
hin
a)
Tota
l SA
(Fr
ance
)
Ch
evro
n C
orp
(U
SA)
E.O
n A
G (
Ger
man
y)
Pet
rob
ras
Bra
sile
iro
(B
razi
l)
Exxo
n M
ob
il C
orp
(U
SA)
BP
(U
K)
Pet
ro C
hin
a C
orp
(C
hin
a)
Gaz
pro
m O
ao (
Ru
ssia
)
Ro
yal D
utc
h S
hel
l (N
eth
erla
nd
s)
Value of assets 2010 (m$) Ranking Country/company GDP/value of
assets 2010 (M$) 30 Denmark DNK 313365,84
31 United Arab Emirates ARE 297648,48 32 Greece GRC 292304,60
33 Royal Dutch Shell Netherlands 292181,00 34 Colombia COL 286381,04
35 Gazprom Oao Russia 270501,00 36 Petro China Corp China 254914,00 37 Malaysia MYS 246821,03
38 BP UK 235968,00 39 Finland FIN 235257,89
40 Exxon Mobil Corp USA 233323,00
41 Hong Kong SAR,
China HKG 228816,35 42 Nigeria NGA 228637,86 43 Portugal PRT 227196,97 44 Egypt, Arab Rep. EGY 218894,28 45 Israel ISR 217443,43 46 Chile CHL 216308,87 47 Singapore SGP 213154,52 48 Ireland IRL 205252,96 49 Philippines PHL 199589,45 50 Czech Republic CZE 198929,32
51 Petrobras Brasileiro Brazil 190411,00 52 E.On AG Germany 187467,00 53 Pakistan PAK 176477,53 54 Chevron Corp USA 164621,00
Power dynamics in the energy sector 25
Source: Bussiness InsiderThe 15 Biggest Energy Companies In The World, 2011
Source: World Bank Data
Felipe González PSOE (Former Primer
Minister) Adviser for GAS
NATURAL 126.500 €/year
Javier Solana Secretary General of the NATO (1995-99)
High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Secretary General of the Council of the European Union
(1999-2009)
International Adviser ACCIONA in 2009 when he was 67.
Luis de Guindos PP Minister of Economics
ENDESA Former Adviser of ENDESA 368.000 € in2011
José Maria Aznar (Former Primer
Minister) PP.
Adviser for ENDESA
200.000€/year
Ángel Acebes PP Minister of Internal Affairs
External Adviser of IBERDROLA 450.000 €/year
Power dynamics in the energy sector 27
Name Policy Area Former employer Date New employer
Mårten Westrup (Sweden)
Energy/Climate BusinessEurope, Adviser - Industrial Affairs
Committee (climate change)
jun-11 DG Energy, Energy policy & monitoring of electricity,
gas, coal and oil markets
Mogens Peter Carl
(Denmark)
Environment DG Environment, Director-General
feb-10 Kreab Gavin Anderson (lobby consultancy),
Senior Adviser
Mårten Westrup (Sweden)
Energy/Climate DG Enterprise (for 27 months), Policy officer
and Legal officer
Dec 2009
BusinessEurope, Adviser - Industrial Affairs
Committee (climate change)
Derek Taylor (Britain)
Energy/Climate DG Transport and Energy, Energy adviser
Aug 2009
Burson-Marsteller (lobby consultancy) + others,
Adviser on energy issues
Marcus Lippold
Energy/Climate ExxonMobil, Various since 1992
oct-08 DG Energy, International relations officer
Luc Werring (Netherlands
)
Energy/Climate DG Transport and Energy (for 23 years),
Principal adviser to the Director-General
Dec 2007
Hill & Knowlton (lobby consultancy), Senior adviser on transport,
energy and environment
Power dynamics in the energy sector 28
Power dynamics in the energy sector 29
The campaign challenging BP's Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline (BTC)
52.7% Dependency 2010
The external dimension of the EU energy security 30
Energy security
External dimension
Ofensive portfolio
“ Energy security for the West has often meant insecurity for the rest”
Energy for what and
for whom?
ENERGY GRABBING
Energy for what and for whom? 31
Energy • Cosmovisions and energy • Social Energetic Metabolism • Geopolitics of energy
Energy Grabbing and Power dynamics • EU dependency and EU energy security • The concept of Energy Grabbing • 50 years of Energy Grabbing in Nigeria • Power dynamics in Energy Sector
Alter(n)atives • Questions and answers
www.odg.cat
Production
Renawables
Kwh
Supply
CO2 Energy Efficiency
Geopolitics
Rights and justice
Impacts
Energy grabbing
Power dynamics
Transnational corporations
Alter(n)atives: alternatives + “alteratives”
Choice between two or more things + alter and challenge power dynamics
Individual Collective Political
Paul Aries Political scientist
Degrowth
Alter(n)atives 34
ALTER(N)ATIVES
35
What are sustainable energy systems (SES)? Production, distribution and consumption patterns
Consumption (needs), distribution, production. Voluntary simplicity
Minimum energy to provide good living
EU Energy Security Policy: Energy Grabbing, Power dynamics in the energy sector Alter(n)atives 35
India Japan
Peter Menzel, Hungry Planet
What is the role of the community in SES? (Technologists ) Demystify and Detechnify energy information. Democratice information.
What are the reasons for introducing SES? Resilience, Necessity, Ideology, …? Rights and justice.
EU Energy Security Policy: Energy Grabbing, Power dynamics in the energy sector Alter(n)atives 36
Technologists don’t be developers!
What are SES in different context (global/local – economically rich/poor societies – vernacular/modern cultures)? Not only kwh, energy use.
What are the drivers and barriers for SES? Power dynamics, revolving doors, unSES (lock in)
EU Energy Security Policy: Energy Grabbing, Power dynamics in the energy sector Alter(n)atives 37
Global responsibility Radicalization of solidarity
EU Energy Security Policy: Energy Grabbing, Power dynamics in the energy sector 38
Thank you for your attention! Gràcies per la vostra atenció!
08/06/13 First assembly of catalan movement for an Energy Sovereignty
EU Energy Security Policy: Energy Grabbing, Power dynamics in the energy sector Questions 39
• How can we address energy grabbing?
• What is the role of Technologists in addressing it?
• Do you think SES have to consider Justice and Rights?
This meeting has been organized with the financial assistance of the European Union. The content of this document is the sole responsibility of Observatori del Deute en la Globalització and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.