Upload
phamkiet
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/1
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
1. Basic design rules for electrical machines
2. Design of Induction Machines
3. Heat transfer and cooling of electrical machines
4. Dynamics of electrical machines
5. Dynamics of DC machines
6. Space vector theory
7. Dynamics of induction machines
8. Dynamics of synchronous machines
Source:
SPEED program
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/2
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
Source:
Siemens AG
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/3
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/4
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
a
pzk
⋅⋅=
π21
2Machine constant:
Induced voltage:
Machine torque:
Flux:
)()()( 2 fmi itktu ΦΩ ⋅⋅=
)()()( 2 fae itiktm Φ⋅⋅=
)()(
)()( tudt
tdiLtiRtu i
aaaaa +⋅+⋅=Armature circuit:
Mechanical acceleration:
Field circuit:
Non-linear differential equations, even if Lf = const.
)()( tmtmdt
dJ se
m −=⋅Ω
dt
tdiLtiRtu
fffff
)()()( ⋅+⋅=
)( fiΦ
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/5
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Saturation-dependent field inductance Lf(if)
Main flux per pole:
Field inductance:
)( fiΦ
αΦ tan~/)()( fffff iiNiL ⋅=
α
Lf(if)
if00
unsaturated iron
saturated iron
Air-gap magnetization
iron magnetization
Linearized field inductance:
ϕ
ϕ
kNL
iikNL
fIf
fffIf
fN
fN
⋅=
⋅⋅= /
fNIfL
fNI
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/6
• Armature field: Armature self-inductance La
Main field: Field self-inductance Lf .
Mutual inductance Maf only between
a) commutating armature coils (= short-circuited by brushes) and
b) field coil, otherwise zero.
dttdiLRtitu
titttktu
tudttdiLRtitu
fffff
fmi
iaaaaa
/)()()(
))(()(),()()(
)(/)()()(
2
⋅+⋅=
==
+⋅+⋅=
ΦΦΦΩ
No magnetic coupling between armature and field circuit
coil: Nc
brush
coil
main pole area
5. Dynamics of DC machines
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/7
5. Dynamics of DC machines
If flux is kept constant, set of differential equations is linear.
ffff IRUtu ⋅==)(
)()(
)()(
)()(
2
2
tmtikdt
dJ
tkdt
tdiLtiRtu
sam
ma
aaaa
−⋅⋅=⋅
⋅⋅+⋅+⋅=
ΦΩ
ΦΩ
One linear differential equation of second order with constant coefficients:
sma
a
aaa
ma
a
a
a mkTTdt
du
RTi
TTdt
di
Tdt
id⋅⋅
⋅+⋅
⋅=⋅
⋅+⋅+
Φ22
2 11111
dt
dm
Jm
JTu
kTTTTdt
d
Tdt
d ss
aa
mam
ma
m
a
m ⋅−⋅⋅−⋅⋅
=⋅⋅
+⋅+1111111
22
2
ΦΩ
ΩΩ
Electrical time constant of armature:
Mechanical time constant of machine and load:
aaa RLT /=2
2 )( Φk
RJT a
m
⋅=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/8
5. Dynamics of DC machines
- Changing of armature current and rotor speed is ruled by armature voltage and is
disturbed by load torque, which both are contained in "right side" of system
differential equation.
- DC machine at constant flux: LINEAR system:
DC machine may be controlled in an easy way.
- Mechanical time constant Tm decreases with the square of increasing flux.
- Machine gets ”weaker” at:
a) Flux weakening
b) Increased stator resistance Ra, which causes voltage drop, thus reducing
internal voltage Ui,
⇒ Mechanical time constant = response to load step: Tm increases !
Features of separately excited DC machine at constant flux
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/9
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Starting time constant of electric machines
tJ
Mdt
J
MtM
dt
dJ
M
Nt
tM
NmN
mM ⋅==→=⋅ ∫
=0
)(ΩΩ
N
NM
N
mNMJ
M
nJ
M
JT
⋅⋅=
⋅=
πΩ 2
Relationship between starting time constant and mechanical time
constant is given with per unit resistance ra and flux φ:
:/,/
NNN
aa
IU
Rr ΦΦφ ==
2
2
200
1)/(
⋅⋅=⋅=⋅=
Nam
NN
NNM
N
mMJ
rT
Ik
kUJ
MJT
ΦΦ
ΦΦΩ
Example:
ra = 0.05, Φ = ΦN :
TJ0 = 20.Tm
TJ0 = 10 s, Tm = 0.5 s
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/10
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Starting time constant vs. mechanical time constant
:/,/
NNN
aa
IU
Rr ΦΦφ ==
2
2
22
22
22
222
200
11
)(
)(1
)(
)(
1)/(
φΦΦ
ΦΦ
Φ
ΦΦΦΩ
⋅⋅=
⋅⋅=⋅⋅⋅⋅=
=⋅⋅=⋅=⋅=
am
Nam
NN
N
a
aM
NN
NM
NN
NNM
N
mMJ
rT
rT
k
k
I
U
Rk
RJ
kI
UJ
Ik
kUJ
MJT
Starting time to no-load speed n0:
Starting time to rated speed nN:
N
mMJ
MJT 0
0
Ω⋅=
0JN
mNMJ T
MJT <⋅=
Ω
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/11
Summary: Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
- Separately excited DC machine treated in this lecture
- Second order differential electro-mechanical equation for armature circuit
- At constant main flux: Linear differential equation
- Long mechanical and short electrical time constant
- Do not mix mechanical time constant and starting time constant
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/12
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/13
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamics of mechanical system of DC machine (1)
Taking ma TT << leads to 0→aT :
a) Steady state condition: d/dt = 0 :
sm
msm
am mJ
Tm
J
Tu
k⋅−=⋅−= 0
2
1Ω
ΦΩ
Steady state condition
sam
mm
m mJ
ukTTdt
d⋅−⋅=⋅+
1111
2ΦΩ
Ωa
amm i
k
R⋅−=
ΦΩΩ
20
aa
mm ik
R⋅−=
ΦΩΩ
20
am uk Φ
Ω2
0
1=
aa
sm
am
aesi
k
Rm
J
T
kRJT
ikmm
ΦΦ
Φ
22
2
2
)/(/=
=
⋅==
No-load speed
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/14
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Steady-state characteristic in p.u.
aa
mm ik
R⋅−=
ΦΩΩ
20
xry a ⋅−= 1
am
a
m
m ik
R⋅
⋅−=
020
1ΩΦΩ
Ω
NamNiammN Uukui ==⋅==⇔== 020 :0, ΩΦΩΩΦΦ
N
aa
N
a
NN
a
m
m
I
ir
I
i
IU
R⋅−=⋅−= 1
/1
0ΩΩ
0m
myΩΩ
=
N
a
I
ix =
1
1
•
Example:
Small two-pole PM-excited DC motor:
ra = 0.2
Speed at rated current:
8.012.0110
=⋅−=⋅−=N
aa
m
m
I
ir
ΩΩ
0.8
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/15
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamics of mechanical system of DC machine (2)
b) Dynamic operation:
Example:
Switching on of DC machine at a) rated flux and b) no-load ms = 0:
Initial condition: Zero speed . Armature voltage is switched from zero to
rated value Ua = UN for t > 0:
0)0( =mΩ
( ))/exp(1)( 0 mmm Ttt −−⋅=ΩΩ
sam
mm
m mJ
ukTTdt
d⋅−⋅=⋅+
1111
2ΦΩ
Ω
am
mm
m ukTTdt
d
ΦΩ
Ω
2
111⋅=⋅+
am uk Φ
Ω2
0
1=
ms
ms = 0
Ua = UN
Solution:
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/16
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamic speed response of separately excited DC machine to switching with armature voltage step, leading to exponential increase of speed !
)/exp(0m
m
mme Tt
TJ
dt
dJm −⋅⋅=⋅=
ΩΩ yields armature current )/exp( m
a
Na Tt
R
Ui −⋅=
Dynamics of mechanical system of DC machine (3)
( ))/exp(1)( 0 mmm Ttt −−⋅=ΩΩ t ≥ 0
t ≥ 0
a
a
a
a
m
ma
e
R
u
JR
k
kk
uJ
kT
Ji
k
m=⋅⋅=
⋅⇒=
22
222
0
2
)(1 ΦΦΦΦ
ΩΦ
)0( =sm
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/17
- “Jumping” armature current (due to Ta = 0)
and decreasing armature current due to
speeding up of the rotor to no-load speed.
- At (ideal) no-load the armature current
also in motor operation is zero!
mTt
a
Na e
R
Uti
/)(
−⋅=
t
ia(t)
Tm
Armature currentUN/Ra
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamics of mechanical system of DC machine (4)
NN
a
Na
NN
a II
R
Ui
IU
R⋅===→= 40
025.0ˆ025.0
/
Attention: Starting resistor is necessary:
Too big!
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/18
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Taking ma TT << leads to ∞→mT , if electrical system only is investigated.
a
ia
aa
m
aa
aa
a
a
L
uu
RT
k
RT
ui
Tdt
di −=
⋅⋅
−⋅
=⋅+ΩΦ21
a) Steady state condition: d./dt = 0:
a
ia
a
iaaa
R
UU
R
uuIi
−=
−==
Dynamics of electrical system of DC machine (1)
Steady state condition
)( aaia iRuu −⋅−=
-ia > 0: Generator operation
aaiaaia RiuRiuu ⋅−−=⋅+= )(
.0/
:
constdtd
J
mm =→=
∞→
ΩΩ
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/19
5. Dynamics of DC machines
b) Dynamic operation:
Example:
Switching on of DC machine rated flux, no-load, zero speed: Ωm = 0
Initial condition: Zero current
Armature voltage is switched from zero to rated value ua = UN for t > 0.
0)0( =ai
( )aTt
a
Na e
R
Uti
/1)(
−−⋅=
Dynamics of electrical system of DC machine (2)
aa
Na
a
a
RT
Ui
Tdt
di
⋅=⋅+
1Solution: t ≥ 0
0 ia = UN/Ra
UN
ua
GEN.
MOT.
1mΩ
12 mm ΩΩ <
0=mΩ
ia
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/20
5. Dynamics of DC machines
- Dynamic current response of separately excited DC machine at stand still to
switching with armature voltage step of rated voltage, leading to exponential
increase of armature current.
Armature current and so electromagnetic torque react to armature voltage steps
with the short armature time constant Ta.
- So separately excited DC machines are dynamic drives.
Dynamics of electrical system of DC machine (3)
( )aTt
a
Na e
R
Uti
/1)(
−−⋅= t ≥ 0
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/21
Summary: Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately excited DC machine
- Separate solving of electrical and mechanical machine behaviour
- Steady-state solution and step response
- Consumer reference system used
- Steady-state solutions already known from bachelor´s course
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/22
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/23
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Homogeneous differential equation:
Characteristic equation for λ:
If , then
dt
tdm
Jtm
JTtu
kTTTTdt
d
Tdt
d ss
aa
mam
ma
m
a
m )(1)(
11)(
1111
22
2
⋅−⋅⋅−⋅⋅
=⋅⋅
+⋅+Φ
ΩΩΩ
011
2
2
=⋅⋅
+⋅+ mma
m
a
m
TTdt
d
Tdt
dΩ
ΩΩ
ttmh eCeCt 21
21)(λλΩ ⋅+⋅=
m
a
aamaa T
T
TTTTT
41
2
1
2
10
112,1
2 −±−=→=⋅
+⋅+ λλλ
am TT 4< 144
1 −=−m
a
m
a
T
Tj
T
T
Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system (1)
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/24
a) am TT 4> 21, λλ are real values, so transient speed response contains TWO
time constants 2211 /1,/1 λλ −=−= TT , a short and a long one.
b) am TT 4= λλλ == 21 is real value, so transient speed response contains ONE time constant λ/1−=T (“aperiodic limit”).
c) am TT 4< 21, λλ are complex values dj ωδλ ⋅+−=1 , dj ωδλ ⋅−−=2 , so
transient speed response oscillates with frequency )2/( πωddf = ,
which is damped by damping coefficient δ.
aTT ≥2
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system (2)
a) 21 /2
/1)(
TtTtmh eCeCt
−− ⋅+⋅=Ω
long time constant:
m
a
a
T
T
TT
411
21
−−
= , short time constant
m
a
a
T
T
TT
411
22
−+
=
mTT ≤1
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/25
aTT ≥2
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Long and short time constant T1 and T2
mTT ≤1Long time constant:
Short time constant:
am
m
a
m
m
a
m
a
a
m
a
a
TTTT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TT
ma−≈
+=
−−−
≈
−−
=<<
12
211
2
411
2
21
+⋅≈
−=
−+
≈
−+
=<<
m
aa
m
a
a
m
a
a
m
a
aTT T
TT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TT
ma1
1211
2
411
22
• t0
1T mT2TaT
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/26
5. Dynamics of DC machines
b) Ttmh eCt /)( −⋅=Ω , aTT 2=
c) )sin()cos()( teBteAt dt
dt
mh ⋅⋅⋅+⋅⋅⋅= ⋅−⋅− ωωΩ δδ A, B: integration constants
- Damping coefficient: aT2
1=δ
- Eigen-frequency: 4
1
2
1
4
1
2
1 2
−⋅⋅
=−⋅
=aJ
a
am
a
ad
rT
T
TT
T
Tf
φππ
, Period: d
df
T1
=
Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system (3)
- Number NH of half periods, until oscillations are damped to 5%:
δω
ωπδ
δδ d
ddH
t
T
tNte ≈==→=→=⋅−
/
/3
2//3*05.0
**
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/27
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Example: Separately excited DC machine: Inertia TJ = 1 s, electric parameters: Ta = 50 ms, ra = 0.05, NΦΦ = .
- With TJ ≅ TJ0: Mechanical time constant: 501/05.01 2
2=⋅=⋅=
φa
Jm
rTT ms
- As msTmsT am 200504450 =⋅=<= , DC machine oscillates:
- frequency 76.24
1
05.0
05.0
05.02
1=−⋅
⋅=
πdf Hz
- angular frequency /3.172 == dd fπω s,
- oscillation period of 36276.2/1/1 === dd fT ms.
- Damping coefficient: /1005.02
1
2
1=
⋅==
aTδ s
- After 73.110
3.17==≈
δωd
HN half-periods the oscillation is damped
down to 5% of initial value.
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/28
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Speed response to mechanical load torque stepData: 1,05.0,50,1 ==== φaaJ rmsTsT , step in shaft torque of 5.0/ =Ns MM∆
Result: msTmsTs mdd 50,363,/3.17 ===ω
MeMN/2 MN
-2.5% -5%
aa
U
aa
a
m
m
aa
mm
irIU
R
Ik
R
N
⋅−=⋅−=
⋅−=
110
20
ΩΩ
ΦΩΩ
Transient speed response:
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/29
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Example: Start-up of unloaded, separately excited DC motor (ms = 0, Φ = const., 4.Ta < Tm) (1)
sma
a
aaa
ma
a
a
a mkTTdt
du
RTi
TTdt
di
Tdt
id⋅⋅
⋅+⋅
⋅=⋅
⋅+⋅+
Φ22
211111
dt
du
RTi
TTdt
di
Tdt
id a
aaa
ma
a
a
a ⋅⋅
=⋅⋅
+⋅+111
2
2
)0()0()0()0()0(0)0(,0)0(0)0( aaaiaaaaim uiRuuiLiu =−−=′⋅==⇒=Ω
sUURT
uUs
L
u
TT
I
T
IsIs aa
aa
aa
a
a
ma
a
a
aa /
)0()0(2 =−⋅
=−⋅
+⋅
+(
((((
−−
−⋅
−⋅=
++⋅=⇒=
⋅+
⋅+
21212
2 111
)/(1/
1
λλλλ ssRT
U
TTTssRT
UI
RT
U
TT
I
T
IsIs
aa
a
maaaa
aa
aa
a
ma
a
a
aa
(((
(
( )21 //
/41
2
2)( TtTt
ma
a
aa
aa ee
TT
T
RT
Uti −− −⋅
−⋅=
( )21 //
/41
/)(
TtTt
ma
aaa ee
TT
RUti
−− −⋅−
=
4.Ta < Tm: λ1, λ2 are real numbers!
e.g.: T1 ≈ Tm , T2 ≈ Tama
a
TTT
/411
21 −⋅=− λλ
)()()/(1/ 212 λλ −⋅−=⋅++ ssTTTss maa
aaaa IsiIsiL((⋅=−⋅=′ )0( aaaaaaa LuIsiisIsiL /)0()0()0( 22 −⋅=′−⋅−⋅=′′
((
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/30
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Example: Start-up of unloaded, separately excited DC motor (ms = 0, Φ = const.) (2)
Time t
0)0( =ai
t = 0
0)0( =au
0)0( =n )2/()( 20 ΦπkUntn N==∞→
( )21 //
41
/)(
TtTt
m
a
aaa ee
T
T
RUti
−− −⋅
−
=
Na Utu => )0(
0)( =∞→tia
- Current rises approximately with Ta
- Speed rises approximately with Tm
- Current decreases approximately
with Tm
T1 ≈ Tm , T2 ≈ Ta
Qualitative solution:
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/31
Summary: Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited DC machine
- Mechanical and electrical transients are change of speed and armature current
- DC machine may oscillate, if mechanical time constant is rather short
- In most cases the big load inertia does not allow any oscillation
- Dynamic current overshoot calculated during motor start-up
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/32
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/33
))(()()()(/)()()( 2 titttkdttdiLRtitu fmaaaaa ΦΦΦΩ =+⋅+⋅=
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Linearized model for variable flux
dttdiiLRtitu ffffff /)()()()( ⋅+⋅=
)()()(/)( 2 tmtitkdttdJ sam −=⋅ ΦΩNon-linear expressions
For investigations of small disturbances the equations are linearized !
Small transient deviations ∆ua(t), ∆ia(t), ∆Ωm(t), ∆ms(t), ∆Φ(t), ∆if(t), ∆uf(t) from
the steady state operation Ua, Ia, Ωm, Ms, Φ, If, Uf !
ffff iiNL /)(Φ=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/34
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Linearized model variables
For investigations of small disturbances the equations are linearized !
Small transient deviations:
ua(t) = Ua + ∆ua(t)
ia(t) = Ia + ∆ia(t)
Ωm(t) =Ωm + ∆Ωm(t)
ms(t) = Ms + ∆ms(t)
Φ(t) =Φ + ∆Φ(t)
uf(t) = Uf + ∆uf(t)
if(t) = If + ∆if(t)
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/35
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Linearized differential equations at variable flux- Small transient deviations from steady state operation: e.g.: from
- ”Small”: Per unit deviation < 10%:
- Neglect product of small deviations in voltage equation:
- Result for induced voltage ui(t) and torque me(t) :
)(tua∆ aU
1/)( <<aa Utu∆
))(
1())(
1())(())(()( 22 Φ∆Φ
Ω∆Ω
ΦΩ∆ΦΦ∆ΩΩtt
kttktum
mmmmi +⋅+⋅⋅⋅=+⋅+⋅=
Φ∆Φ
Ω∆Ω
Φ∆Φ
Ω∆Ω
Φ∆Φ
Ω∆Ω
Φ∆Φ
Ω∆Ω )()(
1)()()()(
1))(
1())(
1(tttttttt
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m ++≈⋅+++=+⋅+
20.11.01.0101.01.01.011.01.01.01.01)1.01()1.01(21.1 =++≈+++=⋅+++=+⋅+=
)()()()()( ,,222 tutuUtktkktu imiimmmi ΦΩ ∆∆∆ΦΩΦ∆ΩΦΩ ++=⋅⋅+⋅⋅+⋅⋅≅
)()())(())(()( 2222 tIktikIkttiiktm aaaaae ∆ΦΦ∆Φ∆ΦΦ∆ ⋅⋅+⋅⋅+⋅⋅≈+⋅+⋅=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/36
A) LINEAR differential equations, neglecting products of ∆ :
5. Dynamics of DC machines
)()()()(
)()()(
)()(
22
22
tmtIktikdt
tdJ
tktkdt
tidLtiRtu
saam
mma
aaaa
∆∆ΦΦ∆∆Ω
∆ΦΩΦ∆Ω∆
∆∆
−⋅⋅+⋅⋅≈⋅
⋅⋅+⋅⋅+⋅+⋅≈
Linearized dynamic equations (1)
( ) ( )
( )ssaae
mm
mmiaa
aaaaaa
mMIkikMdt
dJ
kkUdt
iIdLiIRuU
∆∆ΦΦ∆∆ΩΩ
∆ΦΩΦ∆Ω∆
∆∆
−−⋅⋅+⋅⋅+≈+
⋅
⋅⋅+⋅⋅+++
⋅++⋅≈+
22
22
( )
ssaaem
mmia
aaaaaa
mMIkikMdt
dJ
kkUdt
idLiIRuU
∆∆ΦΦ∆∆Ω
∆ΦΩΦ∆Ω∆
∆∆
−−⋅⋅+⋅⋅+≈⋅
⋅⋅+⋅⋅++⋅++⋅≈+
22
22
0,0 ==dt
d
dt
dI ma Ω
Stationary equilibrium
cancels !
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/37
5. Dynamics of DC machines
)()()()(
)()()(
)()(
22
22
tmtIktikdt
tdJ
tktkdt
tidLtiRtu
saam
mma
aaaa
∆∆ΦΦ∆∆Ω
∆ΦΩΦ∆Ω∆
∆∆
−⋅⋅+⋅⋅≈⋅
⋅⋅+⋅⋅+⋅+⋅≈
B) LINEAR differential equations of deviations :
”Small signal theory”:
Linear differential equation system is only valid within the limits of deviation from
steady state operation of about +/- 10 ... 20 %.
Constant parameters of differential equations depend on steady state values.
C) In case of linear systems NO linearization is necessary: ”Large signal theory”!
Example:
Separately excited DC machines with constant flux operation !
Linearized dynamic equations (2)
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/38
Summary: Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
- Method of linearization of non-linear equations shown
- Linearization only possible for small disturbances („perturbation method“)
- Perturbation method leads to small signal theory
- Separately excited DC machine at constant main flux linear also for large signals
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/39
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/40
- Here: Constant flux operation (Φ = const.) = linear system !
- Initial conditions set to zero:
- Laplace transform: and so on ....
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
0)0( =au∆ , 0)0( =ai∆ , 0)0( =m∆Ω , 0)0( =∆Φ , 0)0( =sm∆ , 0)0( =fi∆
aT/1=γ
)()0()()(
sisisisdt
tidL aaa
a((
∆⋅=∆−∆⋅=
∆
)()()(
)()()()(
2
2
smsikssJ
sksiLssiRsu
sam
maaaaa(((
((((
∆Φ∆Ω∆
ΦΩ∆∆∆∆
−⋅⋅=⋅⋅
⋅⋅+⋅⋅+⋅=
s
Φ = const.:
−⋅⋅
+⋅⋅
+⋅+
+= )()(
1)( 2
2smsu
R
k
sJ
Tss
ss sa
a
m
m(((
∆∆Φ
γγ
γγ
γΩ∆
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/41
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Characteristic polynomial of 2nd order differential equation
)()(0)( 212 ssss
TsssP
m
−⋅−=+⋅+==γ
γ
- Real part of roots in the left half plane (Re(s1), Re(s2) < 0): stable operation.
- If imaginary part of roots is zero (Im(s1) = Im(s2) = 0): no oscillations occur.
- Real part of roots Re(s1), Re(s2) small: time constants are very long.- Pairs of conjugate complex roots s1, s2: sine & cosine function as transients.
- Imaginary part of root is far off origin (Im(s1) >> 1): oscillation frequency is high.
- Tangent of angle α = number NH of half periods of transient oscillation,
till damped to 5% of initial value.
Hd N==δω
αtan
s1
s2
djs ωδλ ⋅±−== 2,12,1„Roots“:
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/42
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Example: Speed response to mechanical load torque step (1)
Constant armature voltage, load step after no-load operation:
Load torque step: 0)(.;)( === tuconstUtu aaa ∆
)()( tMtm ss ε∆∆ ⋅=
≥
<=
0,1
0,0)(
t
ttε
sJ
M
Tss
s
s
M
R
k
sJ
Tss
ss s
m
s
a
m
m ⋅⋅
+⋅+
+−=
−⋅⋅
+⋅⋅
+⋅+
+=
∆γ
γ
γ∆Φγ
γγ
γ
γΩ∆
2
2
20
1)(
(
Decomposition in single terms for inverse Laplace transformation: for t > 0
s
MtmL s
s
∆∆ =)(
++⋅
⋅−
+++
+−⋅
+=⋅
++
+22
22
222222 )(2)(
121
)(
2
d
d
d
d
ddd ss
s
sss
s
ωδ
ωωδδω
ωδ
δ
ωδ
δ
ωδ
δ
⋅⋅⋅
⋅−
+⋅⋅−⋅ ⋅−⋅− )sin(2
)cos(122
teteT dt
d
dd
tm ω
ωδδω
ω δδ
Laplace
domain:
Time domain:
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/43
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Side calculations for inverse Laplace transform
++⋅
⋅−
+++
+−⋅
+=⋅
++
+22
22
222222 )(2)(
121
)(
2
d
d
d
d
ddd ss
s
sss
s
ωδω
ωδδω
ωδδ
ωδδ
ωδδ
⋅⋅⋅
⋅−
+⋅⋅−⋅+
⋅−⋅− )sin(2
)cos(12 22
22tete d
t
d
dd
t
d
ωωδδω
ωωδδ δδ
22222 )(
1
)(
21
dd
m
s
CBs
s
A
ss
s
s
Tss
s
ωδωδδ
γγ
γ++
++=⋅
++
+=⋅
+⋅+
+δωδ 2))(( 222 +=++++⋅ sCsBssA d
δωδδ 2)()2()( 22
2 +=+++⋅++ sACAsBAs d
δωδ
δ
2)(
12
0
22 =+⋅
=+⋅
=+
dA
CA
BA
)/()2(1
)/(2
)/(2
222
22
22
d
d
d
C
B
A
ωδδ
ωδδ
ωδδ
+−=
+−=
+=
++
−+−+⋅
+=⋅
++
+22
22
2222 )(
)2/()3(121
)(
2
d
d
dd s
s
sss
s
ωδδδω
ωδδ
ωδδ
Inverse Laplace transform
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/44
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Side calculations for more elegant formula description
⋅⋅
⋅−
−⋅⋅−⋅+
⋅− )sin(2
)cos(12 22
22tte d
d
dd
t
d
ωωδδω
ωωδδ δ
m
m
a
a
m
a
m
adm
ad
a
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
TT
T
T==
−+⋅=
−⋅+
=+
−⋅==4
4
14
1
12
14
22:1
4,
2
1
2222 δ
δδ
δωδδ
δωδ
)cos(sincossin2
cos22
ψωωωωωδδω
ω −⋅=⋅−⋅=⋅⋅−
− tMtLtKtt ddddd
dd
d
dddd MLMKtMtMtM
ωδδω
ψψψωψωψω⋅−
=−===→+=−⋅2
sin,1cossinsincoscos)cos(22
222
22222222
21)sin(cos
−+=+=→+==+
d
dLKMLKMMδωδω
ψψ
d
ma
d
dd
ddd
d
TTM
δωδδ
δωδω
δωδω
δωδωδω 2
)1/4(
2)(
2
1)()2(
2
1 22222222222 +−
=+
=+⋅=−+⋅=
mdd
ma
T
TTM
ωωδ 1
2
/4=
⋅= )arccos(/1cos mdmd TTM ωψωψ =→==
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/45
Data:
1,05.0,50,1 ==== φaaJ rmsTsT , step in shaft torque of 5.0/ =Ns MM∆
Result:
msTmsTs mdd 50,363,/3.17 ===ω , 526.0)05.03.17arccos( =⋅=ψ .
- Transient speed response: (t in seconds)
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Speed response to mechanical load torque step (2)
)arccos( mdTωψ =
))526.03.17cos(865.0
11(05.05.0
)( 05.02
0
−⋅⋅⋅−⋅⋅−= ⋅−
tet
t
m
m
Ω∆Ω
−⋅⋅−⋅⋅−=
−)cos(
11)(
2 ψωω
∆Ω∆ te
TT
J
Mt d
T
t
mdm
sm
a
−⋅⋅−⋅⋅−=
−)cos(
11
)( 2
20
ψωωφ
∆Ω
∆Ωte
T
r
M
Mtd
T
t
md
a
N
s
m
m a
Result:
N
a
mN
ma
m
m
M
r
JM
Jr
J
T2
0
02
0
1
φΩΩ
φΩ==
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/46
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Speed response to mechanical load torque step (3)
))526.03.17cos(865.0
11(05.05.0
)( 05.02
0
−⋅⋅⋅−⋅⋅−= ⋅−
tet
t
m
m
Ω∆Ω
MeMN/2 MN
-2.5% -5%
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/47
Summary: Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
- (Linearized) differential equation is „transfer function“ in LAPLACE domain
- Step response calculated via transfer function
- Denominator of transfer function is characteristic polynomial of diff. equation
- Zeros (= “roots”) of characteristic polynomial are „poles“ of the system
in the s-plane
- Negative inverse of „poles“ = time constants or natural frequencies of the system
- Positive time constants for stable operation needed
- Hence poles must lie in the negative s-half-plane
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/48
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/49
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Input for dynamic simulations
- General model calculation possible via numerical integration
- Here: Only: a) Linearized non-linear magnetization characteristic
„flux vs. field current“
b) Separately excited machine
c) Constant flux operation
ϕϕ ΦψΦ kNLiLNik fffffff ⋅=⇒⋅=⋅=⇒⋅=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/50
The function uf(t) must be given for t ≥ 0 ! Initial condition:
5. Dynamics of DC machines
First order differential equations for RUNGE-KUTTA method, here for Φ = const.
)()(
)()( tudt
tdiLtiRtu i
aaaaa +⋅+⋅=
)()( tmtmdt
dJ se
m −=⋅Ω
)()()()( 2 t
L
k
L
tiR
L
tu
dt
tdim
aa
aa
a
aa ΩΦ
⋅−⋅
−=⇒
J
tmti
J
k
dt
d sa
m )()(2 −⋅=
ΦΩ⇒
Initial conditions:
The functions ua(t), ms(t) must be given for t ≥ 0 !
In case of varying flux add the third differential equation:
)0(),0( mai Ω
dt
tdiLtiRtu
fffff
)()()( ⋅+⋅=
)(
)(
)(
)()(
ff
ff
ff
ff
iL
tiR
iL
tu
dt
tdi ⋅−=⇒
)0(fi
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/51
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Example: Separately excited DC machine: motor data, fed from ideal DC voltage (“stiff battery”):
27,5.6,320
min/625,142,460
mkgJAIAI
nkWPVU
MfNN
NNN
⋅===
===
HLRmHLR ffaa 64,25,5.1,05.0 ==== ΩΩ
Two cases investigated:
a) Load step with rated torque at no-load speed, rated armature voltage
and rated flux
b) Armature voltage step of 20% rated voltage at rated motor operation
Load inertia: (i): 8 kgm2 Total inertia: J = 15 kgm2 = JN
(ii): 143 kgm2 Total inertia: J = 150 kgm2
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/52
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Nmn
PM
N
NN 6.2169
)60/625(2
142000
2=
⋅=
⋅=
ππRated torque:
VRIUU aNNi 44405.0320460 =⋅−=⋅−=Induced voltage at rated speed and torque:
VsU
kmN
iN 78.6
)60/625(2
4442 =
⋅==
πΩΦMotor constant and flux per pole:
Motor efficiency: %78.955.625320460
14200022=
⋅+⋅=
+⋅=
fNfNN
N
IRIU
Pη
No-load speed at rated armature voltage and main flux: min/9.64778.62
60460
2 20 =
⋅⋅
=⋅
=πΦπ N
N
k
Un
Steady state characteristics of the DC motor at UN
n
1/min
0 M/MN
647.9/min625/min
1
Case a)
Load step with rated torque at no-load
speed, rated armature voltage and fluxLoad step by 100%
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/53
5. Dynamics of DC machines
VRIUU aNNi 53605.03205522.1 =⋅−=⋅−⋅=Induced voltage at rated torque:
min/7552
60
78.6
536
2
=⋅=→=πΦ
Ω nk
U
N
imMotor speed at constant flux/pole:
No-load speed at 120% armature voltage & main flux: min/9.77778.62
60552
2
2.1
20 =
⋅⋅
=⋅
=πΦπ N
N
k
Un
Steady state characteristics of the DC motor at 1.2UN
n
1/min
0 M/MN
647.9/min625/min
1
777.9/min
755/minx 1.2
Case b)
Armature voltage step of 20% rated
voltage at rated motor operation
Voltage step by 20%
130/min
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/54
5. Dynamics of DC machines
,56.225
64,30
05.0
0015.0s
R
LTms
R
LT
f
ff
a
aa ======
sk
JRT
N
Nam 0163.0
78.6
1505.0
)( 222
=⋅
=⋅
=Φ
(i) at JN = 15 kg.m2
sk
JRT
N
am 163.0
78.6
15005.0
)( 222
=⋅
=⋅
=Φ
(ii) at J = 150 kg.m2
Calculation of time constants
• t0 msTii m 163:)( =msTa 30=
msTi m 3.16:)( =
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/55
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Variation of total inertia: (i) J = 15 kgm2, (ii) J = 150 kgm2
(i) Total inertia 15 kgm2: msTmsT am 12043.16 =<= : damped oscillations occur:
Damping coefficient: sTa
/67.1603.02
1
2
1=
⋅==δ .
Natural frequency: HzT
T
Tf
m
a
ad 69.6
4
1
0163.0
03.0
03.02
1
4
1
2
1=−
⋅=−
⋅=
ππ
Period of oscillation is msf
Td
d 5.14969.6
11===
After 5.267.16
69.62=
⋅==
πδωd
HN half periods the oscillation is reduced down to 5%.
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/56
5. Dynamics of DC machines
(ii) Total inertia increased by factor 10: 150 kgm2
msTmsT am 1204163 =>= : no oscillations occur:
long time constant: ms
T
T
TT
m
a
a 3.123
163
30411
302
411
21 =
⋅−−
⋅=
−−
= ,
short time constant ms
T
T
TT
m
a
a 6.39
163
30411
302
411
22 =
⋅−+
⋅=
−+
=
Variation of total inertia: (i) 15 kgm2, (ii) 150 kgm2
• t0 msT 1231 = msTm 163=
msT 392 =
msTa 30=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/57
5. Dynamics of DC machines
a) Load step with rated torque at no-load speed, rated armature voltage and flux
At low total inertia DC machine is oscillating
At big total inertia no oscillation occurs
2169.6 Nm
Damping completed after 2.5 half
cycles
msTm 163=
msTd 5.149=
)mkg150( 2⋅=J
)mkg15( 2⋅=J
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/58
5. Dynamics of DC machines
a) Load step with rated torque at no-load speed, rated armature voltage and flux
At low total inertia DC machine is oscillating
At big total inertia no oscillation occurs
647.9/min625/min
320 A
Armature current is
proportional to torque me
)mkg150( 2⋅=J
)mkg15( 2⋅=J
)mkg150( 2⋅=J
)mkg15( 2⋅=J
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/59
5. Dynamics of DC machines
b) Armature voltage step of 20% rated voltage at rated motor operation
Big armature current = big torque: to accelerate inertia to higher speed, demanded by higher armature voltage
Big inertia J = 150 kgm2
320 A320 A
460 V 552 V =1.2 x 460 V
625/min755/min
1750 A
msTm 163=
No oscillations
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/60
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Small inertia J = 15 kgm2
b) Armature voltage step of 20% rated voltage at rated motor operation
Smaller peak armature current (1180 A < 1750 A)= smaller peak torque: to accelerate the lower inertia to higher speed
Oscillation occurs320 A320 A
460 V552 V
625/min755/min
1180 A
Damping completed
after 2.5 half cycles
Oscillation occurs
msTd 5.149=
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/61
Summary: Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
- Linear differential equation is solved numerically via RUNGE-KUTTA
- Parameter variation: Big vs. small inertia = without / with oscillations
Usually: Load inertia big, so no oscillations occur!
- Step response to torque as disturbing signal
- Step response to armature voltage as commanding signal
- Further example in the text book with variable series resistor
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/62
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics
5. Dynamics of DC machines
5.1 Dynamic system equations of separately excited DC machine
5.2 Dynamic response of electrical and mechanical system of separately
excited DC machine
5.3 Dynamics of coupled electric-mechanical system of separately excited
DC machine
5.4 Linearized model of separately excited DC machine for variable flux
5.5 Transfer function of separately excited DC machine
5.6 Dynamic simulation of separately excited DC machine
5.7 Converter operated separately excited DC machine
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/63
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Converter-operated separately excited DC machine
αα cos)( 0 ⋅= dd UU 23
0 ⋅⋅= LLd UUπ
B6C bridge
Rectified voltage from the grid:
rectified voltage
Six-pulse ripple
ULL
T = 1/f0T/6
ft πωω∆α 2, =⋅=
∆t
0)0( dd UU ==α
B: bridge6: 6-pulseC: controlled Thyristor control: Ud > 0, Ud < 0 possible
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/64
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Armature current with six-pulse ripple due to B6C converter
Measured armature current
DC motor 40 kW
Separately excited
Fed by B6C armature thyristor bridge
Six-pulse ripple = 6x50 = 300 Hz
Armature inductance is small: La ~ Na
2 ~ z2, so ia-ripple is big!
Six-pulse rippleT/6
Calculation example in “Collection of Exercises”
Iad = 124 A
ia(t)
T = 20 ms, f = 1/T = 50 Hz
T/2 = T =
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/65
5. Dynamics of DC machines
B2H-converter (cheap solution)
•
•• •
ugrid(t)
uf(t)
Lf & Rf
T
T
D
D
ugate(t)
α
α
D: diode
T: thyristor
Due to diodes: only Uf > 0 possible
B: bridge2: 2-pulseH: half-controlled
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/66
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Field current: Two-pulse ripple due to B2H-converter
Measured field current
DC motor 40 kW
Separately excited
Field current fed by B2H thyristor bridge
Two-pulse ripple = 2x50 = 100 Hz
Field inductance is big:Lf ~ Nf
2, so if-ripple is small!
Measured field voltage
αf
Two-pulse ripple
Six-pulse ripple due to armature reaction
if(t)
uf(t)
T = 20 ms, f = 1/T = 50 Hz
T/2 = T =
T/2
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/67
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Magnetic coupling of stator and armature field via iron saturation
Armature and stator field add= increased yoke flux density
= increased saturation
increased saturation
Armature field ~ iaStator field ~ if
Facit: Due to the magnetic common path in the yoke a change of the armature current causes a change
of yoke iron permeability. Hence also the stator field changes and induces a voltages in the field coil,
which causes a (small) six-pulse field current ripple.
ia(t)
(small) six-pulse field current
ripple
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/68
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Armature 0,0 >>< aa IU
B6C: One six-pulse, voltage controlled thyristor bridge, 6 thyristors. Voltage and current ripple: 6f = 300 Hz.
0,0 ≥≥≤ Mn , but often only:
One quadrant operation: 0,0 ≥≥ Mn
Armature 0,0 ><>< aa IU
(B6C)A(B6C): Two anti-parallel six-pulse, voltage controlled thyristor bridges, 12 thyristors Voltage and current ripple: 6f = 300 Hz Four quadrants operation:
Field B2H: One two-pulse, voltage controlled thyristor-diode bridge, 2 thyristors, 2 diodes Voltage and current ripple: 2f = 100 Hz
Field
B2C: One two-pulse, voltage controlled thyristor bridge, 4 thyristors Voltage and current ripple: 2f = 100 Hz
Field B6C: One six-pulse, voltage controlled thyristor bridge, 6 thyristors Voltage and current ripple: 6f = 300 Hz
Different configurations of controlled rectifier bridges for armature and
field circuit of separately excited DC machines
0,0 ><>< Mn
0,0,0 ≥≥≥ Φff IU
0,0,0 ≥≥>< Φff IU
0,0,0 ≥≥>< Φff IU
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/69
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Four-quadrant operation
0
nU a , 0,0 ≥≥ ΦfI
ea MI ,
Motor operation
Motor operation
Generator operation
Generator operation
1st quadrant2nd quadrant
3rd quadrant 4th quadrant
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/70
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Parallel B6C bridge operation
αGR
αWR
°180
tω
tω
0
0
GRdU αcos0
WRdU αcos0−
WRdGRd UU αα coscos 00 −=
GRWRWRGR αααα −°=⇒−= 180coscos
Facit: With the condition both bridges deliver the same average
voltage and can therefore operate in parallel on the DC machine.GRWR αα −°=180
Two anti-
parallel bridges
operate with
the same
average output
voltage in
parallel.
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/71
5. Dynamics of DC machines
(B6C)A(B6C)-bridge operation
If both anti-parallel bridges are on at the same time, a
parasitic circular current iK flows via both bridges.
Additional chokes LK are limiting iK
A: anti-parallel
WRGRWRGR uuuu +=−− )(2TK
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/72
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Exact calculation of parasitic circular current iK
KKKKKKK TtTTtUdtdiLtu ≤≤−⋅−=⋅= )sin(/)sin(/)( ωω
( )CtTL
ULdttuti
KK
KKKK −⋅
⋅=⋅= ∫ )cos(
)sin(/)()( ω
ωω0)( =−= KK Tti )cos( KTC ω=
)sin(
)cos()cos()(
K
K
K
KK
T
Tt
L
Uti
ωωω
ω−
⋅=
For small values TK the parabolic approximation of iK is derived!
)sin(~)( ttuK ω
)sin(
)cos(1)0(ˆ
K
K
K
KKK
T
T
L
Utii
ωω
ω−
⋅===
)cos(~)( ttiK ω
6/2 TTK ≤UK
2TK
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/73
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Parabolic approximation of small parasitic circular current iK
K
KKK
L
TUi
2ˆ =
UK
t
t
T/6
2TK
uK
iK
-TK 0 TK
)sin(
)cos(1ˆ
K
K
K
KK
T
T
L
Ui
ωω
ω−
⋅=
K
KK
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
KK
L
TU
T
T
L
U
T
T
L
Ui
2
)2/)(1(1
)sin(
)cos(1ˆ2
=−−
⋅≈−
⋅=ωω
ωωω
ω
For small values of α: 16/2 <<⇒<< KK TTT ω
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/74
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Three-phase AC 400 V grid, B6C-bridge:
maximum voltage: VUUUU LLddd 54024003
23
0cos)0( 00 =⋅⋅=⋅⋅==⋅==ππ
α
rated voltage: 4602
354030cos)30( 0 =⋅=°⋅=°= dd UU α V
voltage margin for voltage control: VVVUd 80460540 =−=∆So thyristor bridge is operated between .
Example:Three-phase AC 400 V grid, usual rated and maximum voltages:
Maximum voltage Rated voltage
B6C 540 V 460 V 1 quadrantoperation
(B6C)A(B6C) 540 V 400 V 4 quadrantoperation
Voltage limits of converter-operated DC machines
°<<° 15030 α
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/75
Φ⋅≈+= nURIUU iaaia ~ nIuIM aRa ⋅⋅ ~~ Φ
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Limits of converter-fed DC machine operation
Nnn ≤≤0 Voltage controlled DC machine:
Limits: Maximum armature current ia, maximum main flux Φ
RN nnn ≤≤ Flux controlled DC machine (Field weakening): Φ ↓ Limits: Maximum armature current ia and voltage ua
maxnnnR ≤≤ Flux controlled DC machine (Field weakening): Φ ↓ Limits: Maximum armature voltage ua and maximum reactance voltage of commutation uR,max = 12 V
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/76
5. Dynamics of DC machines
Time for reversal of armature current.
a) (B6C)A(B6C) b) (B6C)A(B6C) c) Mechanical switch
Both bridges always active Only one bridge active Polarity changer
< 0.5 ms 5 ... 10 ms 50 ... 1500 ms
The larger numbers correspond with larger drives of several hundreds of kW up to MW range.
Time for reversal of field current.
a) (B6C)A(B6C) b) Mechanical switch
0.5 ... 2 s 1 ... 2.5 s
The larger numbers correspond with larger drives of several hundredsof kW up to MW range.
Typical response times of converter-fed DC machines
aaafff RLTRLT // =>>=
Fast DC machine reaction via change of ia, NOT via change of if!
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT
DARMSTADTINSTITUT FÜRELEKTRISCHE ENERGIEWANDLUNG
Prof. Dr. A. Binder, Energy Converters - CAD and System Dynamics
5/77
Summary: Converter operated separately excited DC machine
- Thyristor converter operation of DC machine is a dynamic operation
- Armature current time signal may be calculated analytically
(see: Collection of Exercises)
- Anti-parallel thyristor rectifier for reversed torque
- Circulating parasitic current between the two thyristor bridges possible
- Limiting operation curves for variable speed DC machine
- Typical dynamic response times of controlled DC machines rise with increased
machine size
- Fast control via change of armature current due to Ta << Tf
Energy Converters – CAD and System Dynamics