Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EMPLOYMENT LAW BRIEFING 2015
*This presentation is offered for informational purposes only, and the content should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.
Mobility and Restrictive Covenants
Overview
Protecting Assets at the Front Door: Confidentiality, PIAA and Non-Disclosure Agreements
What Is a Solicitation?
Protecting Your Confidential Information When an Employee Leaves
Post Employment Disputes
2Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Protecting your assets at the front door: Agreements with new employees
Confidentiality Agreements
Restrictive Covenants (generally not permitted in CA) Non-competition
Non-disclosure
Non-solicitation
Written Acknowledgement of Policies Regarding Use and Monitoring of Email, Computers and Other Electronic Devices
3Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
What is a solicitation?
Are status updates a solicitation? Coface Collections North America, 430 Fed. Appx. 1162 (3rd Cir.
2011), profile updates and social media posts can be introduced as evidence of breach
Sasqua Group v. Courtney (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2012), court found client list was publicly available info through LinkedIn contact list, and denied trade secret protection
NDSL, Inc. v. Patnorde, 2012 WL 6096584 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2012), generic LinkedIn invitation found insufficient to show customer solicitation in violation of non-solicit agreement
4Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Confidentiality
Uniform Trade Secrets Act Adopted in 47 states.
Two part definition of a “trade secret” “Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to
maintain its secrecy.” Derives independent economic value from not being generally known to
the public or others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use [and is not readily ascertainable by proper means]
5Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Confidentiality
Best Practices Principles Targeted but not onerous
Focused on confidentiality
Takes into account how social media actually works
6Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Confidentiality agreement
In most jurisdictions, continued employment is sufficient consideration. Not clear in California, so ensure consideration exists
Defines customers, customer contacts, similar compilations as “Confidential Information”
Employer owns Confidential Information Labor Code section 2860
Morlife, Inc. v. Perry (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1514
7Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Confidentiality agreement
Employer owns the “Confidential Information” in whatever form it may exist Hard copy records
Electronic format
Employee’s memory
8Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Best practices after employment
Policy regarding remote wiping and monitoring of drives and devices
Exit interview – set expectations
Inventory what was returned
9Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Best practices after employment
Reminder letter
Cease and desist letter
Evidence preservation demandMay need a court order
Litigation
10Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
The burning questions in every restrictive covenant dispute
Is the Agreement Enforceable?
Did the Individual Violate Its Provisions?
11Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Is the agreement enforceable?
In most states OTHER than California, a restrictive covenant must be reasonable in scope: Time 1-2 years in the employment context Sale of a business & then 5 years
Geography An activity restraint, such as non-solicitation of customers can
satisfy Activity Restrained Must Serve A Legitimate Purpose To preserve confidential information To protect customer relationships
12Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Enforceable If There Is
Any Legitimate Purpose
Consideration Beyond Mere Employment
Proof That Confidential Information Was Actually Given at the Outset of Employment
Blue Penciling Prohibited
Enforceability issues vary state-by-state
13
SimplyUnenforceable
Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Blue Penciling Allowed
Blue Penciling AllowedTo Remove, But Not To Add
Blue Penciling Only In Connection With The Sale Of A Business
Unclear
Blue Penciling Not Allowed
Is blue penciling – court modification to legal limit – allowed?
14Employment Law Briefing 2015
Generally enforceable with some relationship to State
Follow the Restatement; enforceable if there are contacts with the State, and the contract doesn’t offend public policy
Generally will not enforce choice of law provision
Beware of choice of law limitations
15Employment Law Briefing 2015
What to do (and not to do) once an employee has left to compete
16Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Example of how NOT to draft A letter
17
Dear John,
I am in receipt of your resignation letter. Please remember that as condition of your employment with Acme Co., you signed a non-compete agreement. That non-compete agreement provides that for a period of two years after your employment with Acme, you will not solicit Acme’s customers or employees; and that you will not retain, use, or disclose any of Acme’s proprietary trade secrets or confidential information. This letter is a reminder that you are obligated to abide by the terms of your non-compete agreement. Please be advised that Acme will take all steps necessary to ensure their interests are protected, including filing a lawsuit against you and/or your new employer.
Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
our Company
our Company. Our
Acme employees,your company’s confidential,
Generic Reminders Prompt Generic Denials
The response you will get:
18Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Dear Former Employee,
I am in receipt of your resignation letter. As a condition of your employment with Acme Co., you signed a non-compete agreement which prohibits you from you from working for a competitor for two years. It has come to our attention that you may have accepted employment with a competitor of Acme Co. In order to assure Acme that you are abiding by the terms of your non-compete agreement, we would like some basic information:
•Where are you currently working?
•What is your position with your new employer?
•What are your responsibilities?
•Have you and your new employer put in place any protections to ensure that you are not violating your agreement with Acme and that you will not disclose, rely upon or use Acme’s confidential, proprietary information? If so, what is that plan?
Draft A letter that asks questions
19Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Dear Former Employee,
I am in receipt of your resignation letter. As a condition of your employment with Acme Co., you signed a non-compete agreement which prohibits you from you from working for a competitor for two years. It has come to our attention that you may have accepted employment with a competitor of Acme Co. In order to assure Acme that you are abiding by the terms of your non-compete agreement, we would like some basic information:
• You participated in year-end strategic planning meetings less than 30 days before your resignation. Please tell us when you first accepted employment with your new employer.
• Please confirm, by signing the attached affirmation, that prior to your resignation you returned, and did not take any of the Company’s proprietary, confidential information.
Draft A letter that asks questions
20Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
What if you’re on the defensive
Stave off a TRO by providing enough assurance and a cooperative spirit that letter keeps them from filing
Shift burden to former employer to be very specific about what its trade secrets are, and measures they recommend we take
Imply that they will have to expose their trade secrets in litigation and all of their measures to maintain as secret will be under scrutiny
21
Dear Mr. Jones:
Thank you for your letter. ACME takes your concerns very seriously. We have confirmed with Ms. Smith she has already returned any of ABC’s confidential information that she may have had in her possession prior to her resignation. Likewise, we have made it clear to Ms. Smith that she is not to reveal any of ACME’s confidential information, such has business strategies, marketing strategies, pricing, vendors, etc.
If you have concerns that Ms. Smith may be at risk of disclosing your confidential information despite our commitment, it would be helpful if you could provide a detailed description of the information that Ms. Jones had access to while employed at ABC. Once you provide that information, we can than compare your information with her current job duties to ensure that no inadvertent disclosure occurs
Sincerely,
Michael Sheehan
Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
Get your house in order before you sue
A prerequisite to any trade secret claim is demonstrating that your information is “secret,” and that you take “reasonable measures” to protect that secrecy:Make sure your handbook has a strong confidentiality statement
Ensure that access to confidential information is only provided to those employees who have a need to know
Work with your IT group to prevent employees from copying or printing certain extremely sensitive information
Have employees regularly acknowledge that the information they are accessing is confidential and is to be used for business purposes only
22Employment Law Briefing 2015 January 2015
I understand that the information that I am accessing is confidential and proprietary. I agree that I will not use, disclose, or reveal this information to any person except when acting within the scope of my responsibilities
for the Company
I Agree
23Employment Law Briefing 2015