32
Emphasizing the Dialog at Monterey Peninsula College •Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College What we do, What we emphasize, And why

Emphasizing the Dialog at Monterey Peninsula College Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College What we do,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Emphasizing the Dialog atMonterey Peninsula College

• Fred Hochstaedter• Academic Senate President• SLO Coordinator• Monterey Peninsula College

What we do,What we emphasize,

And why

We hope that SLOs can provide a formal framework for faculty to converse, as professionals, about teaching, learning, pedagogy, and curricula.

Professional teachers talking to each other about teaching and student learning is a primary characteristic of a vibrant academic institution. We hope that the result of these conversations is more insightful pedagogy that improves student learning in MPC courses.

-MPC SLO Committee, 2007

Our Philosophy

What We WantedA process that is simple (Keep it Simple Sweetheart)

A process that is sustainable in a variety of budget environments A process that fit with our existing processes such as resource allocation

Led to Three Principles…

Three Principles

1.All SLOs (program, institutional, general education) must be evaluable at the course level.

More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf

Evaluation of student work

Grades:Information for

the Student

SLOs:Information for

the Program

Leads to…

More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf

Three Principles

2. Instructors regularly evaluate student learning. The result of this effort is valuable information for quality improvement for the program.

Three Principles

3. We need to give faculty members time to engage in the dialog.

More info: http://www.mpcfaculty.net/senate/FacultyHandbook/FacultyHandbookSLOs.pdf

Monterey Peninsula College Planning and Resource Allocation Process

(simplified version)1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan

1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups

3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups

4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel

4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel

5. Evaluation Institutional Area

5. Evaluation Institutional Area

Monterey Peninsula College Planning and Resource Allocation Process

1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan

1. Planning 3-year Institutional Educational Master Plan

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups

3. Institutional Review Administration Faculty-led advisory groups

4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel

4. Resource Allocation Infrastructure Equipment Personnel

5. Evaluation Institutional Area

5. Evaluation Institutional Area

SLOs live here

Data drivenDialog

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

Instructor Reflections on Student Learning

Program Reflections on Student Learning

These Forms/Processes are the Heart of MPC’s SLO Efforts.They are designed to prompt Dialog Collaboration Improvement Efforts Action Plan Rationale

Code word for SLO

1. Instructor Reflections on

Student Learning

2. Program Reflections on

Student Learning 3. Action Plans

Instructor Reflections …

…leads to…

Program Reflections …

…Two hours during each flex day…

…leads to…

…Annual Report / Action Plans

PRSL = SLO

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

2. Program Review 6-year Cycle Annual Report with Action Plans

From the Student Learning Section…

And then…

And then…

And finally…

SLOs are fully integrated into the 6-year program review guidelines

Integration of Student Learning and Program Reflections into *all* resource allocation processes.

1. Faculty Position Requests

3. Foundation Grant

Proposals

2. Classified Position Requests

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

Excerpts from Anthropology Program Reflections

At MPC, the Program Reflections are The heart of dialog during flex activities Cited as rational for action plans Well integrated into the Program Review Process Well integrated into all resource allocation processes Viewed as the basis for dialog Visited at least once per semester and most importantly…

At MPC, the Program Reflections are

A grass-roots, bottom-up, approach

to evaluating student learning

and using the results to inform plans to improve.

We hope that SLOs can provide a formal framework for faculty to converse, as professionals, about teaching, learning, pedagogy, and curricula.

Professional teachers talking to each other about teaching and student learning is a primary characteristic of a vibrant academic institution. We hope that the result of these conversations is more insightful pedagogy that improves student learning in MPC courses.

-MPC SLO Committee, 2007

Our Philosophy

The primary purpose of an ACCJC-accredited institution is to foster learning in its students.

An effective institution ensures that its resources and processes support student learning, continuously assesses that learning, and pursues institutional excellence and improvement.

An effective institution maintains an ongoing, self-reflective dialogue about its quality and improvement.”

-ACCJC, “Introduction to the Accreditation Standards”

From the ACCJC