Emanuel County Schools

Focus on Data to

Improve Performance

2009 System AYP Report(July)

AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report.

Emanuel County AYP Report July 2009 Over view

Emanuel – CRCT Math July 2009

Emanuel – CRCT Reading/Eng. Lang. Arts

Emanuel – GHSGT Enhanced Math

Emanuel – GHSGT Eng. Lang. Arts

Emanuel – Second Indicator - Attendance

Emanuel – Second Indicator – Graduation Rate

AYP Status Summary• SPS – Met AYP• SES – NI1 (R/ELA – SWD)• SMS – NI1 (Math & R/ELA – SWD)• SHS – NI6 (ELA - Black & SWD – Graduation Rate)• ASPA – Did Not Meet (Math – Econ. Disadvantage)• TCE – Met AYP• ECI – Did Not Meet ( CRCT Math – Black)(Grad. Rate – All students) (GHSGT Math – All Students & Econ. Disadv.) (GHSGT ELA – Econ. Disadv.)

Emanuel & Georgia AYP Comparison

CRCT Math

CRCT R/ELA

GHSGT Math

GHSGT ELA Attend. Grad Rate

State 78.0 89.6 78.1 90.6 6.3 77.8Emanuel Co. 69.3 85.2 74.7 83.9 8.0 72.5

AYP 2009 RESA Comparison

CRCT Math CRCT R/ELA GHSGT Math GHSGT ELA Attendance Grad RateBurke County 73.7 85.4 85.4 78.9 6.3 68.0Columbia County 86.7 94.0 87.5 94.9 4.6 82.3Emanuel County 69.3 85.2 74.7 83.9 8.0 72.5Glascock County 66.7 83.9 80.0 93.3 10.2 76.2Jefferson County 72.6 82.7 63.3 84.2 2.6 68.1Jenkins County 70.8 88.2 78.4 84.5 8.1 68.3Lincoln County 81.6 94.7 79.8 82.7 4.0 85.6McDuffie County 74.9 88.6 76.6 90.6 7.4 77.6Richmond County 62.9 84.2 62.3 84.1 6.8 68.4Taliaferro County 65.6 80.6 64.7 88.2 5.2 80.0Warren County 65.4 84.5 46.5 81.4 10.2 64.6Wilkes County 73.5 88.3 88.1 95.5 5.8 88.6

Emanuel County3-Year Comparison

AYP Report by Subgroup

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System CRCT Math

2007 2008 2009All Students 71.1 69.7 69.3Black 68.1 61.3 59.5Hispanic 73.5 68.3 66.3White 85.4 76.7 77.7SWD 49.6 41.2 36.9Econ Disadv. 73.3 65.4 64.5

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System CRCT Reading / Language Arts

2007 2008 2009All Students 84.5 85 85.2Black 78.3 79.6 79.3Hispanic 71.7 78.2 79.6White 90.9 90.4 90.9SWD 65 61.1 58.3Econ Disadv. 81.3 81.7 82.5

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System GHSGT Enhanced Math

2007 2008 2009All Students 64.9 65.9 74.7Black 49.2 48.7 63White 78.8 80.1 87SWD 6 31.2 44.4Econ Disadv. 53.1 57.6 86.6

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System GHSGT English Language Arts

2007 2008 2009All Students 82.4 80.8 83.9Black 69.4 67.8 78White 94.7 90.7 90.2SWD 44 51.1 53.3Econ Disadv. 75 74 77.9

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System Second Indicator - Attendance

2007 2008 2009All Students 9.8 10.4 8Black 5.7 4.6 4.1Hispanic 7.1 5.3 7.5White 13.8 16 11.4SWD 11 13.5 11.2Econ Disadv. 10.4 11.2 8.8

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System Second Indicator – Graduation Rate

2007 2008 2009All Students 67.2 63.1 72.5Black 57.7 52.8 63.2White 77.1 71.9 80SWD 34.3 20.5 28.1Econ Disadv. 57.7 53.7 63.4

How to Planfor

Better Resultswith the

Data Available

Data Available on MyGaDOE

Step 1 – MyGaDoe Login Step 2 – AYP Reports

Step 3 – Select School – View Report

Step 4 – Academic Performance – AYP Indicator

Step 5Select Download

Step 6Download File

Step 8 – Open File

Step 7 – Save file and openCaution – Sensitive

Information

Step 9 – Yes to accept format

Click on the “Second Indicator” for additional information.

The Data

Retained informationFAY statusDays absentTest data 9th Grade Enter Date. . . plus more

Grade LevelGenderRaceDate of BirthSWDELLESOL

AMOAnnual Measureable Objectives

CRCT AMO Reading/ELA CRCT: Reading/English Language Arts

Annual StepGeorgia AMOs (Benchmarks)

(AYP Targets)

2003 60.00%

2004 60.00%

2005 66.70%

2006 66.70%

2007 66.70%

2008 73.30%

2009 73.30%

2010 73.30%2011 80.00%

2012 86.70%

2013 93.30%

2014 100.00%

CRCT AMO Math CRCT: Mathematics

Annual StepGeorgia AMOs (Benchmarks)

(AYP Targets)

2003 50.00%2004 50.00%2005 58.30%2006 58.30%2007 58.30%2008 59.50%2009 59.50%2010 67.60%2011 75.70%2012 83.80%2013 91.90%2014 100.00%

GHSGT AMO - Math Enhanced GHSGT: Mathematics

Starting PointAnnual Step

Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks)(AYP Targets)

2003 n/a

2004 62.30%

2005 62.30%

2006 66.60%

2007 66.60%

2008 74.90%

2009 74.90%

2010 74.90%2011 81.20%

2012 87.40%

2013 93.70%

2014 100.00%

GHSGT AMO - ELA Enhanced GHSGT (E-GHSGT): Language Arts

Starting PointAnnual Step

Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks)(AYP Targets)

2003 n/a

2004 81.60%

2005 81.60%

2006 84.70%

2007 84.70%

2008 87.70%

2009 87.70%

2010 87.70%2011 90.80%

2012 93.90%

2013 96.90%

2014 100.00%

Graduation Rate TableGraduation Rate

School Year AMO

2006-07 65%

2007-08 70%

2008-09 75%

2009-10 80%

2010- 11 90%

2011-12 90%

2012 -13 95%

2013-14 100%

Data Analysis• Get ready – what do you know already?• Identify areas for comparison.• Examine trends and relationships.• Identify and define problem areas.• Develop intervention strategies.• Evaluate – plan progress monitoring

(benchmark testing) to determine the effectiveness of intervention strategies.

Trends• Has one area been consistently weak over the

past three years? • Has one area been consistently strong every year?• Do there appear to be relationships between data?• Do there appear to be relationships between

student performance and instructional practices . . . teacher experience . . . class size?

• Are there patterns with grades levels?

Identify Inconsistencies

• Identify test scores inconsistent with the course grade.

• Identify large score discrepancies in a particular area from year to year?

• Are there any surprises in the data?• Identify score discrepancies between

teaching teams or teachers?

StrategiesObtainable / sustainable solutions within our control.

• What intervention strategies are being used or planned already?

• What would yield the most immediate results or changes?

• What factors are in our control?

Tomorrow’s Session

Share and discuss your AYP reportDiscuss trends identified for your

schoolWhat are the implications?Share strategies and solutions for

improvement this upcoming year.

Each school will report out their information.

Analyze the Data SPS2009 CRCT Scores from 3rd Grade

(SMS)2008 CRCT Scores from 2nd Grade

(SPS)2009 CRCT Scores 1st & 2nd Grade

(SPS)

SES 2008 CRCT Scores 2nd Grade (SPS)2009 CRCT Scores 2nd Grade (SPS) –

preparation for 20102009 CRCT Scores 3rd – 5th Grade

(SES)

TCE2009 CRCT Scores 1st – 5th Grade

(TCE)2008 CRCT Scores 1st – 5th Grade

(TCE)

Analyze the Data ASPA2009 CRCT Scores 1st – 8th (ASPA)2008 CRCT Scores 1st – 8th (ASPA)

SMS2008 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (SES)2009 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (SES) –

preparation for 20102009 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (SMS)

Analyze the Data ECI2009 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (TCE) – preparation for 20102009 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (ECI)2008 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (ECI)2006 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (ECI) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT2009 GHSGT Scores

EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT successEOCT scores – compared to state/RESAEOCT scores – analyze by subject areasEOCT scores – analyze by teacher

Analyze the Data SHS2009 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (SMS) – preparation for 20102009 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (ASPA) – preparation for 20102006 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (SMS) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT2009 GHSGT Scores

EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT successEOCT scores – compared to state/RESAEOCT scores – analyze by subject areasEOCT scores – analyze by teacher

Data ResourcesAssistant Principals will have access to folder on

their desktop with test results and other data.GaDOE If you need additional data, please let us know and

we will work to get you the information you need.