30
The European Small Claims Procedure and other EU Instruments: Why is it useful to choose the European Small Claims Procedure? Elena D’Alessandro University of Turin

Elena D’Alessandro University of Turin

  • Upload
    calder

  • View
    61

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The European Small Claims Procedure and other EU Instruments: Why is it useful to choose the European Small Claims Procedure?. Elena D’Alessandro University of Turin. EU Instruments  European Enforcement order. ESCP ( Regulation No 861/2007). EOP ( Regulation No 1896/2006). EEO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

The European Small Claims Procedure and other EU Instruments: Why is it useful to choose the European Small Claims Procedure?

Elena D’AlessandroUniversity of Turin

Page 2: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

EU Instruments European Enforcement order

ESCP (Regulation No 861/2007)

EOP (Regulation No 1896/2006)

EEO (Regulation No 805/2004)

Brussels I bis Regulation (Regulation No 1215/2012)

Page 3: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Choosing among the Regulations..

Page 4: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

I

What kind of claim will you submit to a Court?

Page 5: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Scope. Differences in excluded Matters

EEO EOP ESCP Brussels I bis

Civil and Commercial MattersExcluded Matters: 1) Arbitration2) Claims arising from Non Contractual Obligations

Page 6: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Scope. Differences in excluded Matters

EEO EOP ESCP Brussels I bis3) Violations of Privacy and of Rights relating to Personality, including Defamation

Court Settlements

Page 7: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

II

Do you have a national dispute

or a cross border dispute?

Page 8: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

National Disputes

Only the Brussels I

(bis) and the EEO

Regulation are

Applicable to National Disputes

Page 9: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Cross Border Disputes

ESCP Regulation can apply solely to

cross border

disputes WITHIN THE EU!

Page 10: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

III

What is your purpose?

Page 11: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Different Purposes achieved

1)Purpose of the Brussels I bis Regulation

Making EU Member State judgments, court agreements and authentic instruments immediately enforceable across the European judicial area without the need for an intermediate exequatur proceeding in the enforcing State and without prescription of minimum procedural standards.

Page 12: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

1)Purpose of the Brussels I bis Regulation

Therefore, the person against whom enforcement is sought shall apply for refusal of the recognition or enforcement of a judgment in the Member State of enforcement if he considers one of the grounds for refusal of recognition or enforcement to be present according to Article 45 of the Brussels I bis Regulation.

Page 13: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

2) Purpose of the EEO RegulationTo create a European Enforcement Order for uncontested pecuniary claims in order to allow, by laying down minimum standards, the free circulation of judgments, court settlements and authentic instruments throughout all Member States without any intermediate proceedings to be brought in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement.

Page 14: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

3) Purpose of the EOP Regulation

To simplify and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure and permitting the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout the Member States.

Page 15: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

4) Purpose of the ESCP Regulation

To simplify and speed up litigation concerning small claims in cross-border cases, in particular cross-border consumer disputes, whilst at the same time reducing costs (for example, no legal or technical assistance is required).

Page 16: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

ESCP Regulation:in the case of non pecuniary claims (< 2000 €),

such as delivery of goods, the creditor can apply solely for the European Small Claims Procedure

Page 17: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

No considerable differences in recognition

Page 18: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

EEO EOP ESCP Brussels I bis

Enforceability conferred by the Member State of origin

YES NO NO YES

Page 19: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

No differences in enforcement procedure

Page 20: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Differences in Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement

EEO ESPC EOPIrreconcilability with an earlier decision/order involved the same cause of action and between the same parties

Page 21: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Differences in Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement

Brussels I bis Regulation Article 45The enforcement of a judgment shall be refused:(a) if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy (ordre public) in the Member State addressed;(b) where the judgment was given in default of appearance, if the defendant was not served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with an equivalent document in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable him to arrange for his defence, unless the defendant failed to commence proceedings to challenge the judgment when it was possible for him to do so;(c) if the judgment is irreconcilable with an (earlier or a subsequent) judgment given between the same parties in the Member State addressed;(d) if the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in another Member State or in a third State involving the same cause of action and between the same parties, provided that the earlier judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State addressed.

Page 22: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin
Page 23: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Conclusions. Strengths & Weaknesses

Main points of attractiveness of the ESCP Regulation:

1) No need to navigate a foreign legal system

2) Convenient and speedy 3)Grounds for refusal of

recognition/enforcement (Irreconcilability with an earlier decision/order)

Page 24: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin
Page 25: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Weaknesses of the ESCP Regulation

1) Art. 5, par. 7, ESCP: “If the counterclaim exceeds the limit set out in Article 2(1), the claim and counterclaim shall not proceed in the European Small Claims Procedure but shall be dealt with in accordance with the relevant procedural law applicable in the Member State in which the procedure is conducted”

Page 26: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

2) Article 26 ESCP Regulation “All procedural issues not specifically dealt with in this Regulation shall be governed by national law”

For example: the possibility of a judicial review

Page 27: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

In Italy, the average disposition time for a civil case is:

(data relatingo to 2008)

First instance Appeal Corte di cassazione

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Page 28: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

......Bruxelles I bis Regulation

Example 1: cross border consumer dispute concerning pecuniary or non pecuniary claims mediation agreement the interested party, in order to obtain a European Enforcement Order, shall apply pursuant to the Brussels I bis Regulation (from January 10, 2015) .

the case is outside the scope of the ESC Regulation!

Page 29: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

......Bruxelles I bis Regulation

Example 2: …..where the national procedural law of the Member State having subject matter of jurisdiction according to the Brussels I bis Regulation Rules contemplates a national small claim procedure, with reasonable costs, rather than applying for a ESC Procedure it will be probably easier for the consumer to act in his own State in order to obtain a judgment, which shall become a European enforcement order pursuant to the Brussels I bis Regulation.

Page 30: Elena D’Alessandro University  of  Turin

Thank you very much for your attention!

[email protected]