Upload
jitendra-mahida
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
1/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Final Report
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
2/104
Electric shock prevention project
1 Table Of Contents
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I
2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
3.1 List of recommendations 23.1.1 Fit For Purpose equipment 23.1.2 Competency of people doing electrical work and welding 33.1.3 Procedures 33.1.4 Management systems 43.1.5 Legislation 4
4 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 5
4.1 Abbreviations 5
4.2 Definitions 5
5 INTRODUCTION 7
5.1 Electric shock 75.1.1 Effects of electric shock 75.1.2 Types of electric shock 7
5.1.3 Causes of shock 8
5.2 Assessment project 85.2.1 Terms of reference 95.2.2 The project team 9
6 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 10
6.1 Electrical inspectors 10
6.2 Philosophy of operation 10
6.3 Electrical engineering safety 11
7 METHODOLOGY 12
7.1 Referenced documents 12
7.2 Electric shock victim management procedure 13
7.3 Management of electrical engineering safety 137.3.1 Risk management 137.3.2 Ownership of electrical work 13
7.4 AS 3000 and AS 3007 audits 13
7.5 Competence 13
7.6 Commissioning and testing 14
7.7 Electrical maintenance 14
7.8 Portable apparatus 14
7.9 Isolation 14
7.10 Welding 14
7.11 Site compliance inspections 157.12 Process 15
7.13 Actions 15
NSW Department of Mineral Resources i
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
3/104
Electric shock prevention project
8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16
8.1 Role of electricity in mining 16
8.2 Procedure for the management of victims of electric shock 16
8.3 Management of electrical engineering safety 178.3.1 Risk management 17
8.3.2 Ownership of electrical engineering safety 17
8.4 AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 audits 17
8.5 Competency standards 188.5.1 Knowledge and Training 19
8.6 Commissioning and testing 198.6.1 Test equipment 20
8.7 Maintenance 21
8.8 Portable Electrical Apparatus 24
8.9 Isolation 28
8.9.1 Internal isolation 29
8.10 Welding 30
8.11 Site compliance inspections 348.11.1 Risk of direct contact 348.11.2 Risk of indirect contact 398.11.3 Fit for purpose electrical equipment 41
9 LEGISLATION 56
9.1 Differences between mining and non mining electrical installations 56
9.2 Legislative models for electrical engineering safety 57
9.2.1 NSW non mining workplace 579.2.2 NSW coal mines 579.2.3 NSW metalliferous and extractive mines and quarries 589.2.4 Comparison of models 589.2.5 Standards of Engineering Practice 58
10 LIST OF APPENDICES 60
10.1 Appendix A: List of Figures 61
10.2 Appendix B: Electric Shock Statistics 64
10.3 Appendix C: Assessment Statistics 6810.3.1 Procedures 70
10.3.2 Equipment Inspections 7310.3.3 Knowledge of Electricity Workers 75
10.3.4 Enforcement Actions 75
10.4 Appendix D: Case Study 1 76
10.5 Appendix E: Case Study 2 79
10.6 Appendix F: Case Study 3 83
10.7 Appendix G: Extracts from AS3859 89
10.8 Appendix H: Extract from Coal Mines (General) Regulation 91
10.9 Appendix I: Extract from the General Rule 2000 9210.10 Appendix J: DMR assessment document 94
NSW Department of Mineral Resources ii
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
4/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
2 Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the following bodies whose support contributed to the
success of the project:
The management and field officers of the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) whoassisted in conducting the assessments.
The mine managers and mine engineers whose high level of cooperation with the minesafety officers (MSOs) conducting the assessments contributed largely to the success of
the project.
The Hunter Industrial Electrical Safety Network (HIESN), a working group constitutedfor the sharing of safety information and learning. The authors wish to acknowledge
HIESN, and in particular member institutions BHP Billiton and Incitec, for their
willingness to share knowledge and experience and guidance documents such as the
Electric Shock Victim Management Protocols.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 1
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
5/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
3 Executive summary
The DMR identified an emerging problem of electric shocks at NSW mines and developed a
systematic program to identify the issues.
This program has shown that:
Industry performance is well below DMR expectations because a significant amount ofequipment is not fit for the purpose for which it is being used. This fitness for purposebegins at the design and carries on through installation and commissioning, operation,
maintenance, modification, decommissioning and finally disposal.
Some important procedures do not exist, some are not known to all people on site and, insome cases, are not complied with.
The training and skill levels of electricity workers have not kept up to date withcontemporary requirements.
Prevention of electric shock is based on multiple barriers being present. The project has
shown that these barriers to preventing electric shock are often absent. When all the barriers
are absent, the result is an electric shock. This absence of multiple barriers shows a failure ofmine management systems. This failure of management systems is shown by the fact that:
A number of mining operations have not identified electricity as a serious hazard
Good electrical engineering practice is not always a prime consideration
The number of non-conformances shows that a number of mines have not paid highregard to complying with legislation
The following section 3.1 summarises the recommendations made in respect to the electrical
safety of all workers at mining operations.
3.1 List of recommendations
3.1.1 Fit For Purpose equipment
All mines carry out a comprehensive AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007
audit on all surface electrical installations. Rank any non-
conformances according to the risk and prepare a schedule for the
rectification work to be carried out over a reasonable time frame.
Particular attention should be paid to:
Refer Section 8.4
(p18)
Ensuring earthing requirements of AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007are met
Refer Section 8.11.2(p40)
Targeting the risk of electric shock due to direct and indirectcontact
Refer Section 8.4
(p18)
Section 8.11.1 (p38)
Ensuring the tests detailed in AS/NZS 3000 Section 6 are carriedout on all electrical installations where required by AS/NZS
3000 and records of such tests are retained at the mine for future
reference
Refer Section 8.6
(p20)
Signs and notices at all electrical installations should be checked toensure that the requirements of the Coal Mines (General)
Regulations, AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 are complied with.
Refer Section8.11.3.2.4 (p50)
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 2
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
6/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Welding equipment must be in a fit for purpose state, and voltage
reduction device (VRD) units should be fitted to the output of
welding machines where the voltage is above extra low voltage.
Refer Section 8.10
(p34)
Consider the fitting of residual current devices (RCDs) to all lighting
circuits, socket outlets and control circuits to field devices that
operate at low voltage.
Refer Section 8.11.2.4
(p40)
Workers doing electrical work have access to suitable test equipment
that has an adequate safety rating.Refer Section 8.6.1
(p20)
Review the means for isolation that are present on site with due
regard to the risk to the operator while carrying out isolation.
Refer Section 8.9.1
(p29)
3.1.2 Competency of people doing electrical work and welding
All mines should detail requirements for the competency of
electricity workers on site. The requirements should contain those
competency elements that relate to all aspects of electricalengineering safety and standards compliance. In particular:
Refer Section 8.5
(p19)
Implement a structured training program aimed to refresh theskills of electricity workers in the area of AS/NZS 3000 and AS
3007 compliance
Refer Section 8.5.1
(p19)
People who do electrical work are sufficiently trained so thatthey are capable of determining the suitability of the instrument
for the circuit under test
Refer Section 8.6.1
(p20)
3.1.3 Procedures
Mines should develop and implement a procedure detailing the steps
necessary to ensure that all victims of electric shock are provided
with transport for professional medical assessment that includes a 12
lead ECG.
Refer Section 8.2 (16)
Mines should review procedures for the safe use and maintenance of
portable tools and leads. The procedures should consider the
adoption of the manufacturers safety directions, AS/NZS 3760 and
AS/NZS 3012, and make particular reference to requirements for
wet areas.
Refer Section 8.8
(p27)
Isolation procedures should contain detailed steps for testing for zero
energy.
Refer Section 8.9
(p29)
Mines should review their welding practices to ensure that they
comply with the requirements of AS 1674.2.Refer Section 8.10
(p34)
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 3
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
7/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
3.1.4 Management systems
Mines should recognise electricity as a serious hazard. Refer Section 8.3
(p17)
Mines should implement engineering risk controls using a
management system approach consistent with AS 4081.
Refer Section 8.3
(p17)
Mines should reassess their maintenance strategy to ensure that it
covers standards compliance and pays particular attention to:
The identification of direct contact risk
The regular testing of earth continuity
Regular insulation resistance testing, and
A testing program aimed to ensure that electrical protectionsystems are set correctly and functional
Refer Section 8.7
(p24)
3.1.5 Legislation
Future revisions to mining regulations for both the coal and the
metalliferous and extractive sectors should:
Require the development, implementation and monitoring ofstandards of engineering practice and that a clear definition of
standards of engineering practice be developed to cover the life
cycle of the equipment
Require records of tests required by AS 3000 to be retained atthe mine
Refer Section 9.2.5
(p59)
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 4
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
8/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
4 Abbreviations and definitions
The following abbreviations are used throughout this report.
4.1 Abbreviations
AS Australian Standard
CMRA Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982
DMR NSW Department of Mineral Resources
ESA Electricity Safety Act 1945
ESEIR Electricity Safety (Electrical Installations) Regulation 1998
GR2000 General Rule 2000
HBA Home Building Act 1989
HBR Home Building Regulations 1997
HIESN Hunter Industrial Electrical Safety Network
IEC International Electrotechnical Commission
IEE Inspector of Electrical Engineering - DMR
IP Ingress Protection rating
MIA Mines Inspection Act 1901
MSO Mine Safety Officer - DMR
OHSA Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
OHSR Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
RCD Residual Current Device (Safety Switch)
SEP Standards of Engineering Practice
SMP Safety Management Plan
SWP Safe Work Procedure
VRD Voltage Reduction Device
4.2 DefinitionsStandards of engineering practice
Standards of Engineering Practice (SEP) are prescribed for the coal mining industry in the
Coal Mines (General) Regulation 1999 (CMRA) and inferred in the General Rule 2000
(GR2000). There is no definition for SEP in legislation. For the purposes of this report the
following working description has been adopted.
A document or set of documents that set the minimum acceptable engineering
standards for all electrical equipment, activities and competencies at a mining
operation. It details the minimum acceptable criteria for the design, manufacture,
installation, commissioning, use, maintenance, modification, decommissioning anddisposal of electrical equipment.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 5
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
9/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
The term SEP is used throughout the document in both the legislative and generic sense.
Because the authors believe that SEPs are fundamental to achieving a structured approach to
electrical engineering safety there has been no distinction made in the way it has been applied
to either the coal or metalliferous and extractive mining sectors.
Pole filler
A device used for blanking off unused circuit breaker positions in distribution boards. Such
devices provide protection against direct contact by providing an ingress protection of IP2X.
Ingress protection
The level of physical protection afforded by a piece of electrical equipment. This is
concerned with protection against the inadvertent entry of personnel and the entry of water
and dust that may adversely affect the safe operation of the equipment. The levels of ingress
protection are detailed in AS 1939-1990Degrees of protection provided by enclosures for
electrical equipment (IP Code).
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 6
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
10/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
5 Introduction
The mining industry has previously had a good record with regards to the number of
electrocutions, with the last death in the NSW mining industry occurring on 13 October 1992.
There have been 119 incidents of electric shock reported in the period 1 September 1999 to
30 June 2002, the period covered by the electric shock statistics in this report (eg Appendix
B). This number had risen to 153 by 30 March 2003. The number of reported electric shocksis at an unacceptable level and shows no indication of declining.
The DMR developed a program to assess and improve electrical engineering safety
performance in the NSW mining industry.
5.1 Electric shock
5.1.1 Effects of electric shock
The effects of electric shock are described in the Australian Standard: AS 3859-1991 Effectsof current passing through the human body (See Appendix G for extracts from AS 3859).
(Note: In late 2002, AS/NZS60479.1Effects of current on human beings and livestock
replaced this standard.)
It is generally known that the human body depends for its survival on oxygen being
transported to the brain. The lungs take oxygen into the blood that is pumped to the brain and
other parts of the body by the heart. Life will be under threat should the normal function of
either the heart or lungs be disrupted. The magnitude and the effect of an electric shock
depend on the current passing through the body. Relatively low levels of voltage and current
can be lethal. Voltages above 50V a.c. are considered lethal and currents as low as 20mA can
affect breathing and 50mA can affect the operation of the heart.(Note: a standard 100 Watt light globe has a current of approximately 400 milliamps (mA)
flowing through it.)
5.1.2 Types of electric shock
AS/NZS 3000 describes types of electric shock and the methods that may be used to prevent
them occurring.
5.1.2.1 Direct contact
AS/NZS 3000 defines direct contact as contact with a conductor or conductive part that is
live in normal service. It further requires that persons and livestock be protected againstelectric shock by direct contact. The methods that may be employed in the prevention of
direct contact are:
Insulation: by completely covering the live parts with an insulating material
Barriers and enclosures: by placing live parts inside enclosures designed to protect againstinadvertent contact with live parts. The level of protection that is required is an ingress
protection rating of IP2X as defined in AS 1939
Obstacles: these shall prevent unintentional approach to the live parts and unintentionalcontact with live parts in normal service
Placing out of reach: by placing accessible parts at different voltages out of arms reach
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 7
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
11/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
5.1.2.2 Indirect contact
AS/NZS 3000 defines indirect contact as contact with a conductive part which is not
normally live but has become live under fault conditions (due to insulation failure or some
other cause). AS/NZS 3000 requires that persons and livestock be protected against the
dangers arising from indirect contact. The methods of prevention against indirect contact are:
Automatic disconnection of supply: by automatically disconnecting the supply on the
occurrence of a fault between live parts and exposed conductive parts or a protectiveearthing conductor
Use of Class II equipment: by the use of appliances and other equipment that do not relyonly on basic insulation for safety
Electrical separation: by the use of supply that is derived from an isolating transformercomplying with AS 3108
5.1.3 Causes of shock
The statistics relating to the incidence of electric shock are contained in Appendix B. The
data shows that the majority of shocks have occurred on the surface areas of mines on fixed
equipment operating at low voltage. It further shows that 62% of shocks were categorised as
being indirect and that in 73% of cases the victim was not an electrical worker. This
information leads to the conclusion that the equipment was not fit for the purpose for which it
was being used. This is further identified in that for 75% of cases not fit for purpose was
identified as the primary cause of the incident.
The fitness for purpose of electrical equipment begins at the design stage and covers the
installation and commissioning, use, maintenance, overhaul and repair, modification,
decommissioning and finally disposal. In any of these stages, the safety of people must not be
compromised by exposure to the risk of electric shock.
In order to achieve fitness for purpose at all stages of the life cycle of electrical equipment,
the people who undertake the tasks associated with each stage must be suitably competent to
carry out those tasks. In the area of compliance with legislation and standards it is vital that
the people who are responsible for achieving compliance are suitably trained in the
requirements of the standards.
5.2 Assessment project
John Waudby, Senior Inspector of Electrical Engineering, NSW Department of Mineral
Resources, initiated this project to investigate the state of electrical installations, current
practices and procedures that mining operations have in place to manage the risk of electric
shock.
The project focussed on, but was not limited to, compliance with the applicable mining
legislation. Compliance with AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 is required by the relevant
legislation for both the coal, and metalliferous and extractive sectors of the industry.
Compliance with other Australian Standards was assessed due to their particular relevance in
the mining industry.
This report makes recommendations that are necessary to improve the electrical engineering
safety and reduce the incidence of electric shock throughout the mining industry.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 8
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
12/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
5.2.1 Terms of reference
Analyse available data on electric shock incidence in the NSW mining industry.
Prepare an assessment document for use during site inspections aimed at identifyingissues that have an impact on the risk of electric shock.
Carry out an assessment on the surface of NSW mining operations to give the DMR anoverview of the management of electrical technology and the state of installations in
relation to issues that have an impact on the incidence of electric shock.
Carry out inspections at all coal operations and a selection of metal mines and quarryingoperations.
Supply operations inspected with a report detailing findings of the inspection.
Construct a database to hold the results of the inspections.
Review legislation for appropriateness.
Make recommendations to reduce the risk of electric shock in the NSW mining industry.
Communicate the findings of the project to the mining industry and other interestedbodies.
5.2.2 The project team
Project manager: Steve Millington, IEE, DMR
Team members: Paul Lackey, MSO (Electrical), DMR
John Weaver, MSO (Electrical), DMR
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 9
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
13/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
6 Background and context
6.1 Electrical inspectors
The DMR employs Inspectors of Electrical Engineering (IEE) as inspectors under the Coal
Mines Regulation Act 1982 and theMines Inspection Act 1901.
The function of an IEE is to assess the safety of electrical installations and practices at mines,and to implement enforcement responses where required. IEE carry out assessments and
incident investigations at mines and processing plants. IEE are also involved in apparatus
approval, workshop approval and workshop auditing functions. IEE are involved in the
setting of standards and are active participants in the preparation of Australian Standards,
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards and MDG guidelines. Due to this
involvement, IEE are ideally positioned to observe the effectiveness of contemporary
electrical engineering safety legislation and standards, and make comparisons of safety
performance against other mining and non mining legislative regimes.
IEE are able to observe and draw comparisons about electrical engineering safety
performance in the non work place, residential installation arena. In addition the IEE havedetailed knowledge of the difficulties confronted in applying existing electrical legislative
requirements.
6.2 Philosophy of operation
Figure 1. Nertney Wheel
The Nertney Wheel.
The basis of this as a model is that in order to have a safesystem, key elements must be present.
These elements are that the system must contain appropriateSafe Working Procedures, using fit for purpose equipment thatis installed and maintained by competent people within a Safe
Working Environment.
The IEE have adopted the Nertney Wheel as a fundamental element of their philosophy of
operation", showing how the IEE consider electrical engineering safety. The philosophy ofoperation is:
Based on risk management
Requiring fit for purpose equipment
Using competent people and processes/procedures
All supported by management systems
Applies throughout the life cycle of the mine
Ownership of safety rests with the mine owners/operators and equipmentmanufacturers/suppliers
The way IEE do things must contribute to changing the safety culture of the industry sothat industry accepts ownership of safety
Anything IEE do must provide for a level of risk less than or equal to the current risk Information is provided in advisory terms, not as a must do it this way, but be prepared
to take appropriate actions against stakeholders not complying with safety legislation
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 10
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
14/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
6.3 Electrical engineering safety
Electrical engineering safety encompasses:
Prevention of electric shock and burns, (electrocution, death or injury as a result of ashock, radiation burns, flash burns, burning particles and plasma)
Prevention of electrical arcing and surface temperatures that have sufficient energy toignite gas and/or dust
Prevention of fires caused by the malfunction of electrical equipment, and
Prevention of injury and death from unintended operation due to a failure to stop, or afailure to operate, of electrically powered and electrically controlled equipment
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 11
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
15/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
7 Methodology
In response to the frequency of reported electric shocks in the NSW mining industry, the
DMR researched all available statistics on electric shock in the industry. This information
showed a recurring pattern of electric shock incidence. A decision was made to conduct an
assessment of the systems that mining operations have in place to manage the risk of electric
shock.
The statistics revealed that the majority of incidents had occurred at surface mines and
quarries and the surface areas of underground mines. Only 21% of the incidents occurred in
the underground workings of mines.
The objective was to conduct the assessment of the surface areas of all coal operations,
including mines and preparation plants, and a number of larger metal mines and quarries. The
project was to assess the sites for compliance with the legislation and standards, and to
ascertain the level of residual risk present on site.
An assessment document was produced to assist in the process and to gather information
about the industry as a whole (Refer to Appendix J). Its function was to investigate how the
industry manages the issues that relate to electrical engineering safety. This documentcovered the areas that were deemed to be a high risk, either due to the historical record of
electric shock, or due to the nature and function of the equipment itself.
A selected number of sites were selected for follow up visits in order to determine whether
there had been an improvement since the initial visit.
The assessment process was designed to examine the procedural aspects of the management
of electrical safety and to conduct an inspection of a selection of electrical equipment that is
common to most mine sites. The equipment inspected was considered to be high risk, either
due to the number of reported electric shocks or the nature of the equipment itself.
7.1 Referenced documents
This project considered the requirements of the following standards, regulations and codes
when conducting the assessments:
NSW Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982
Coal Mines (General) Regulations 1999
Coal Mines (Open Cut) Regulations 1999
Coal Mines (Underground) Regulations 1999
NSW Mines Inspection Act 1901
General Rule 2000
Mines Inspection Regulation 1999
AS/NZS 3000-2000: Electrical Installations (Also known as Wiring Rules)
AS 3007.1-1987 : Electrical Installations - Surface Mines and Associated ProcessingPlant- Scope and Definitions
AS 3007.2-1987 : Electrical Installations Surface Mines and Associated ProcessingPlants General Protection Requirements
AS 3007.3-1987 : Electrical Installations Surface Mines and Associated ProcessingPlants General Requirements for electrical equipment and ancillaries
AS 3007.4-1987 : Electrical Installations Surface Mines and Associated ProcessingPlants Additional Requirements for Specific Applications
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 12
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
16/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
AS 3007.5-1987 : Electrical Installations Surface Mines and Associated ProcessingPlants Operating Requirements
AS 1674.2-1990: Safety in Welding and Allied Processes - Electrical
AS 1966.1-1985: Electric Arc Welding Power Sources - Transformer Type
AS 1966.2-1985: Electric Arc Welding Power Sources - Rotary Type
AS/NZS 3760-2001: In Service Safety Inspection and Testing of Electrical Equipment AS/NZS 3012-1995: Electrical Installations Construction and Demolition Sites
AS 3859-1991: Effects of Current Passing Through the Human Body
AS/NZS 4836:2001 Safe Working on Low Voltage Electrical Installations
The following items (7.2 to 7.11) were covered in the assessment process.
7.2 Electric shock victim management procedure
The existence of a procedure and whether it contained all necessary aspects of victimmanagement
The level at which the procedure was known and understood by all workers on site
7.3 Management of electrical engineering safety
7.3.1 Risk management
The recognition of electricity as a serious hazard
The existence of a SEP to manage the hazards associated with the safe use of electricity
The greatest risk of electric shock on site as determined by the mine personnel
7.3.2 Ownership of electrical work
The organisational structure of the mine with respect to how the electrical workers arecontrolled
7.4 AS 3000 and AS 3007 audits
Whether an audit of the surface areas of the mine for standards compliance has beenconducted
The person or organisation that conducted the audit if one had been carried out
How comprehensive the audit had been and whether it covered every circuit on thesurface of the mine
7.5 Competence
Whether the operation has competency standards for electrical workers
Whether the workers on site meet these standards
The training that electrical workers have received in AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007
Whether the workers on site have been trained to use the mines SEPs
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 13
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
17/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
7.6 Commissioning and testing
Whether the electrical personnel carry out the tests detailed in AS/NZS 3000 Section 6
How the tests are recorded
The commissioning procedure used by the operation
The testing that is carried out on site
The test equipment used by electrical workers
Whether every electrician has access to suitable test equipment and whether the employerprovides it
How electrical workers test for zero energy when carrying out isolation of electricalequipment
7.7 Electrical maintenance
The manner in which maintenance is carried out
Who carries out the maintenance Whether the maintenance strategy has provisions to ensure the ongoing compliance with
AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007
The existence and content of Standards of Electrical Engineering Practice (SEPs) relatingto the maintenance of electrical equipment
Whether the site SEPs meet the requirements of CMRA Regulations and GR2000
Whether there is evidence of the application of relevant standards
Whether the electrical workers have knowledge of, and use of, these standards
7.8 Portable apparatus The existence of a SEP for the safe use and maintenance of portable electrical apparatus
The application of AS/NZS 3760 on site
Whether a testing, inspection and tagging program for portable electrical apparatus andleads is in place
Whether there are special provisions for use the use of portable tools and leads in wetlocations
7.9 Isolation
Whether the mine has documented isolation procedures
Whether the operation has a documented Test Before You Touch procedure
Whether the operation uses a lockout system of isolation
Whether procedures exist for the Removal and Restoration of power
7.10Welding
Whether the operation has a documented procedure for the safe use and maintenance ofwelding equipment
Whether the mine has taken the requirements of AS 1674.2, AS 1966.1 and AS 1966.2
into consideration in determining safe welding procedures
Whether basic welding safety practices are followed
Whether the use of VRDs is practised on site
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 14
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
18/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
7.11Site compliance inspections
The equipment inspection section of the assessment was conducted with focus on the
following areas:
Main switch yard / substation area
Conveyor installation
Three electrical enclosures / switch rooms
General preparation plant areas
Workshops
General electrical installations
Mains fed mobile equipment
7.12Process
Two additional MSOs were appointed to enable the project to be completed in a reasonable
time frame. The MSOs were stationed where they could best access a majority of the mines.An Electrical Inspector was nominated to manage and coordinate the project.
On completion of each inspection and assessment of a mining operation or declared plant a
report was prepared and a copy sent to the operation for information.
A purpose-designed database was used to analyse the information gathered by the
assessments to highlight common problems that require attention.
7.13Actions
Every mine has been forwarded an individual report.In some cases improvement notices were issued.
Where installations were considered unsafe they were rectified immediately, turned off or
temporary barriers installed.
Presentations have been conducted for several industry committees about the project
including:
Internal DMR field officers
Check Inspectors Conference
Hunter Industrial Electrical Safety Network (HIESN)
Mine Safety Advisory Council (MSAC)
Electricity Industry Safety Advisory Council (EISAC)
Mine Electrical Engineers Meetings
Mine Electrical Engineering Safety Conference
Mine Safety Conference (Terrigal)
Articles published in the Mine Safety Update (a DMR publication)
The assessment documents are part of the assessment files for each mine and will be used as
reference material for future assessments by DMR field officers.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 15
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
19/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8 Findings and recommendations
8.1 Role of electricity in mining
We must acknowledge the importance of the supply of electricity and the contribution it
makes to our daily lives. It plays an important role in the mining industry by the provision of
energy for the mining and processing of various minerals and ores. However, it is also a
ubiquitous hazard and a major cause of accidental deaths and injury within the Australian
community.
To minimise this hazard the mining industry must comply with legislation, regulations,
standards, codes of practice, electrical industry safety guides, installation procedures, safe
working procedures, safety tag and lock-out procedures, testing procedures and testing
procedures for installations, etc. Where the legislation, regulations, standards, codes, guides
and procedures are not followed incidences of electric shock are likely to occur.
8.2 Procedure for the management of victims of electric shock
If a person suffers an electric shock it is vital that prompt action is taken in order to increase
the chance of recovery. The effects of electric shock cannot be easily determined by normal
first aid and only medical practitioners have the knowledge and equipment available to
properly treat victims of electric shock. The effects of electricity on the human body are
detailed in AS3859-1991:Effects of current passing through the human body (refer Appendix
G).
The manner in which a mine manages a victim of electric shock is best detailed in a
procedure that is conveyed to all people on site. It was expected that all operations would
have a procedure that covered the care of a victim from the time the shock was received
through to their return to work.
A significant number of electrical workers and mine managers were not aware of the need to
seek medical assessment for all victims of electric shock. The assessment process revealed
that 76% of sites indicated that they would send all victims of electric shock for professional
medical assessment and 61% of mining operations had this detailed in a formal procedure. In
many of those cases the existence and content of the formal procedure was not well known.
61% of Mines have documented victimmanagement procedures.
76% of Mines would refer all victims ofelectric shock to hospital.
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 2. Victim management statistics
50% of Mines have procedures thatrequire an ECG.
Recommendation 1. All mining operations should have a procedure
detailing the steps necessary to ensure that all victims of electric shock areprovided with transport for professional medical assessment that includes a12 lead ECG. The procedure should be known to all workers, including
contractors.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 16
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
20/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.3 Management of electrical engineering safety
8.3.1 Risk management
The assessment project revealed that only 58% of sites had formally recognised electricity as
a serious hazard. The sites that had considered the hazard had not sufficiently addressed the
risk in either the SEP or the SMP in place at the mine.The assessment process included an identification of the greatest risk of electric shock on site
in the opinion of either the manager of the operation or the electrical engineer, depending on
the site.
The most common risks identified by the mine personnel were:
Use of portable electric tools
Welding
Welding in wet locations
Contractors working generally
The identification of the above items as the greatest risk on site did not always lead to those
risks being properly managed.
Very few operations considered the poor state of equipment or installations as their greatest
risk of electrical shock, although some sites had major equipment and installation upgrades
planned. The statistics clearly show that a lack of fitness for purpose was a factor in 75% of
the reported electric shocks.
8.3.2 Ownership of electrical engineering safety
It is difficult to quantify the effect that a particular management structure has on electrical
engineering safety. However, all operations require a level of engineering presence to ensurethat compliance with legislation and standards is maintained. An important element is that the
ownership of electrical engineering safety is vested in a person at the mine. The attributes of
ownership are that it must be identified, agreed and resourced.
At the mines that were assessed as very secure these attributes were strongly evident.
Conversely at the mines assessed as very exposed there was little evidence of ownership.
Ownership can take many forms depending on the nature of the operation, eg coal mine
electrical engineer, or contract electrician at a quarry. It can range from a permanent member
of the management team to a person under a contract or consultant arrangement.
Recommendation 2. Mines should recognise electricity as a serioushazard and identify and implement risk controls in accordance with AS4081.
8.4 AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 audits
Legislation requires that all surface mines and the surface areas of underground mines
comply with AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007. These two standards detail the general
requirements for electrical safety and contain measures for the prevention of electric shock to
both persons and livestock.
It has not been uncommon for inspectors to find that electrical installations are below an
expected standard when carrying out inspections. Previously, inspectors have made
suggestions that all operations should have their electrical installations audited for
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 17
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
21/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
compliance with AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007, and have systems in place to ensure ongoing
compliance.
A number of operations have responded and carried out such audits. In some cases, a
structured audit revealed that there were in excess of 2000 non-compliances on a single site.
58% of Mines have conducted audits for compliancewith standards.
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 3. Audit statistics
26% of Mines have conducted audits that cover allcircuits on surface.
This project revealed that only 58% of mining operations had carried out AS/NZS 3000 and
AS 3007 audits, with only half of these being comprehensive audits. A sample inspection ofselected electrical equipment is not sufficient when determining safety compliance. An audit
of this type needs to cover every electrical circuit on site.
Of the operations that have carried out audits, many have non-conformances that require
attention. In the worst cases the audits had been carried out over two years previously and
non-conformances were still outstanding.
Recommendation 3. All operations carry out a comprehensive AS/NZS3000 and AS 3007 audit on all surface electrical installations. This shouldspecifically target risk of electric shock due to direct and indirect contact.
Rank any non-conformances according to the risk and prepare a schedule forthe rectification work to be carried out over a reasonable time frame.
8.5 Competency standards
The Coal Mines (General) Regulation 1999 Clause 9 requires that all coal mines and declared
plants establish standards of engineering practice. Clause 9 (3) (a) requires that the SEP
contain provisions for competency for working on relevant equipment. The General Rule
2000 Clause 12 (6) requires all persons at the mine have the necessary skills and competence
for the tasks that they are to undertake.
In order to achieve fitness for purpose at all stages of the life cycle of electrical equipment,
the persons who undertake the tasks associated with each stage must be suitably competent to
carry out those tasks.
At 74% of the operations assessed, there were some forms of competency provisions. The
detail of these competency provisions differed markedly from site to site.
Of the sites that do have provisions for competency in the SEP very few have criteria for
what requirements are necessary to achieve that competency. There are very few of the SEP
competency provisions that require an electrical worker of the mine to be licensed.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 18
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
22/104
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
23/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
The Coal Mines (General) Regulations 1999 Clause 28(2) requires all coal mines and
declared plants to comply with AS/NZS 3000. The General Rule 2000 Clause 68 (1)(c)(ii)
requires all metal mines and quarries to comply with AS/NZS 3000.
Recommendation 6.All mining operations adopt a policy where the testsdetailed in AS/NZS 3000 Section 6 are carried out on all electricalinstallations where required by AS/NZS 3000 and records of such tests are
retained at the mine for future reference.
8.6.1 Test equipment
In order to prevent electric shock and arc blast injuries when using test equipment for the
purposes of testing for dead or other reasons, it is vital that electricity workers have access to
suitable test equipment. For test equipment to be suitable for use it must have an appropriate
safety rating and be suitable for the circuit under test.
Non contact detectors are used to detect the presence of electricity without actuallycontacting the live parts. They can be particularly useful when determining if there are
unwanted voltages present in an enclosure after isolation as part of a test before touch
process.
Electricity workers need to know how to determine the suitability of test equipment for the
circuit under test. Only 29% of electricity workers understood the fault level limitations of
the multimeters they were supplied with.
Recommendation 7.All operations ensure that electricity workers haveaccess to suitable test equipment having a suitable safety rating and thatelectricity workers be sufficiently trained so that they are capable of
determining the suitability of the instrument for the circuit under test.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 20
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
24/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.7 Maintenance
Essential to the ongoing compliance to standards and legislation is the maintenance that is
carried out on electrical equipment.
The General Rule 2000 Clause 68 (1)(b) requires that suitable inspection and testing of
electrical installations at the mine is carried out at the time of installation and then
periodically in order to identify any deficiencies and have them corrected.
The Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982 section 103 for mines and section 145 (i) for declared
plants requires all sites to have a system for the inspection and testing of electrical equipment.
In most cases compliance with AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 issues were not well covered in
the maintenance strategy. Those mines that did attempt to cover compliance were very
general in the inspections that were required and rarely did maintenance inspection sheets
cover basic requirements such as risk of direct contact. Many mines do not have specific
equipment checks as part of a maintenance scheme but rather do maintenance on an as
needed basis. The number of non compliances identified during the course of this projectattests to the fact that standards compliance has significant room for improvement.
Figure 4. Socket outlet held in place with tape
Ineffective temporary repairs have been madeto the socket outlet.
The outlet has been held to the mounting blockwith tape.
The tape has since let go allowing the 240 Vsocket outlet to fall away from the base thusexposing the conductors.
This exposes workers to a risk of direct contactwith the exposed live conductors.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 21
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
25/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Essential to the prevention of electric shock by indirect contact is that the protection system is
designed and set according to the application. The elements of the protection system should
be regularly checked to ensure correct operation under a fault condition. The assessment
found that deficiencies existed with the protection of the final subcircuits.
The Coal Mines (General) Regulation 1999 Clause 28 (2) requires that all mines and declared
plants comply with AS 3007. The General Rule 2000 Clause 68 (1)(c) requires all metal
mines and quarries to comply with AS 3007. AS 3007.2 details the requirements for
protection systems at mining sites.
One essential element of a protection system is the integrity of the earthing. If the earthing is
not present or it is inadequate then the protection system is unlikely to operate in case of
fault. Periodic testing for the safety of the electrical installations is not common with only
44% of sites carrying out regular earth continuity testing.
Figure 5. Disconnected earth conductors in electrical panel
Earth conductors which have been leftdisconnected means that there may be someequipment in the field that is no longer earthed.
Maintenance strategies should include earthcontinuity testing protocols that will detectunearthed equipment.
Unearthed equipment may cause protectionsystems to be ineffective and increase the risk ofshock due to indirect contact.
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 6. Percentage of mine that conduct EC testing
44% of Mines conduct regular earth continuitytesting of electrical equipment
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 22
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
26/104
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
27/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
In circuits protected by RCD units the testing of these units to ensure correct function is
essential. The testing requirements and frequency of such tests is detailed in AS/NZS 3760.
Very few of the maintenance schemes in place make reference to this standard and only 44%
of mines carry out the injection tests of RCD units as required by AS/NZS 3760.
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 9. Percentage of mines that injection test RCD units
44% of Mines test RCD unit functionality usinginjection test methods.
Recommendation 8.All mines should reassess their maintenance strategy toensure that it covers standards compliance. The maintenance scheme should
have specific requirements for:
The identification of direct contact risk Regular testing of earth continuity
Regular insulation resistance testing, and a
Testing program aimed to ensure that electrical protection systems are setcorrectly and functional.
Figure 10. Well designed distribution board
Maintenance has been considered in the design of the distribution board.
The socket outlets on the right side of the distribution board have beeninstalled for the sole purpose of injection testing RCD units.
8.8 Portable Electrical Apparatus
Portable electrical apparatus includes portable hand tools, hand lamps, extension cords,portable welders, mains powered measuring equipment, portable heaters, etc. These are all
items of electrical equipment that are held while being used in their normal function and they
account for 19% of the total electric shocks reported.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 24
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
28/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
The assessment project examined all aspects relating to the safe use and maintenance of
portable tools and leads and revealed that the management of portable tools and leads has
significant deficiencies.
Most sites have considered the maintenance of portable tools and leads in the mine
maintenance strategy. AS/NZS 3760 describes the type and frequency of tests required to be
performed on all portable tools to ensure safety.
The type of environment that is present on mine sites and preparation plants is particularly
harsh. AS/NZS 3012 details the precautions necessary for the safe use in environments such
as this. There have been a number of safety alerts advising mine sites to consider the
recommendations of AS/NZS 3012 when using portable tools and leads on site.
The use of portable tools, in particular Class II equipment, can be particularly hazardous if
they are operated in a damp environment and pose a risk of serious electric shock due to the
fact that no protective conductor is present in the tool. Manufacturers of portable tools
usually draw attention to these hazards in their recommendations for safe use.
There was a general lack of acknowledgment of the manufacturers safety directions with
most operators not knowing what these recommendations were, or even having access to the
documentation that is supplied with the tools by the manufacturer.
23% of Mines consider wet areas in the procedures
79% of Mines cover contractor's equipment in their procedures
25% of Mines consider manufacturers safety directions in theirprocedures
10% of Mines consider AS 3012 in their procedures
25% of Mines include steam cleaners, sump pumps etc. in theirportable apparatus scheme
74% of Mines include leads in scheme
78% of Mines include tools in scheme
73% of Mines maintain portable apparatus according to AS3760
32% of Mines consider suitability of equipment in their portableapparatus scheme
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 11. Portable tool statistics
57% of Mines have a documented procedure
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 25
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
29/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Inspections of the portable tools and leads on site revealed that much of the equipment was
not in a fit state to remain in service.
The typical non-conformances observed were:
No evidence of inspections having been carried out
Inspections out of date
Equipment that had visible damage that was still in service
Equipment being used in unsuitable locations
Equipment not fit for the purpose for which it was being used
There is an onus of responsibility on all workers to visually check the equipment prior to use
to make sure that the equipment has a valid inspection tag and that the equipment is not
damaged.
Figure 12. Portable lead with conductors showing
A lead with the conductors showing at the
back of the plug. It was still in service at thetime of inspection.
Figure 13. Lead with current tag that is not serviceable
A damaged lead with a recent inspection tagattached.
The lead was not in a serviceable condition,as the lead was not properly restrained in theplug top.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 26
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
30/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 14. Lead with conductors showing
A lead with the conductors clearly visible at theback of the plug.
Figure 15. Portable welder with damaged case
A welder with a badly damaged case.
The practice of repairing the damage using duct tapeis not a suitable means of repair.
The equipment was still in service and was clearly notfit for purpose.
Recommendation 9. All mines and preparation plants should revise theirprocedures for the safe use and maintenance of portable tools and leads. Thescheme should consider the adoption of the manufacturers safety directions,
AS/NZS 3760 and AS/NZS 3012. It should make particular reference torequirements for wet areas.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 27
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
31/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.9 Isolation
Isolation procedures form an important part in the prevention of electric shock to persons
working on electrical equipment.
When electricity workers are required to work on electrical equipment the Coal Mines(General) Regulation Clauses 27 and 33 require an operation have an isolation procedure to
ensure that conductors are not energised, and that steps are taken to ensure that this will
remain so while work is carried out.
The General Rule 2000 Clause 73(a)(iii) requires that the power supply to equipment be
isolated prior to work being carried out and steps taken to ensure that it cannot be
reconnected accidentally.
Most sites had some form of isolation procedure with 85% having this documented in some
format. It was most common for this to be contained in either the SEP in the case of coal
operations, or in the SMP in metal mines and quarries. In some of the smaller operationsisolation and tagging were contained in the induction documentation only.
There is a trend toward a lockout philosophy for isolation equipment in lieu of tagging alone.
This trend is such that 44% of operations use locks in all or part of the site isolation
procedures whereas 41% still use tags alone in their isolation.
An essential part of isolation procedures is a test before you touch protocol. This is a
critical test where electrical workers are required to work on electrical conductors in order to
prove that correct isolation has been effected. Many isolation procedures require electrical
workers to carry this out but do not specify the test method. The method for conducting a
test before you touch action should be documented.
Documented test before touch procedures were not readily available at most sites.
Recommendation 10. Isolation procedures should contain detailedsteps for testing for zero energy.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 28
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
32/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.9.1 Internal isolation
Isolation devices should be readily accessible without exposing the operator to live parts.
Figure 16. Circuit breakers for isolation
The circuit breakers are located inside anelectrical enclosure that has to be opened to
effect isolation of electrical equipment.
The location of the equipment means theoperator is exposed to an increased risk of injurydue to arc blast.
It is also foreseeable that due to the nature ofoperation of the circuit breaker toggles, a slip bythe operator would result in a serious directcontact shock.
Recommendation 11. Mining operations should review the means forisolation that are present on site with due regard to the risk to the operatorwhile carrying out isolation.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 29
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
33/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.10Welding
The use of welding equipment is responsible for 9% of the total electric shocks reported. In
some cases the contributing factor was the fitness for purpose of the equipment and in other
cases it was the manner in which is was being used.
Welding operations need to be conducted with due regard to the safety of the welder and
other persons who may be in the vicinity and the potential adverse impact on other electrical
installations. This is best detailed in a procedure for safe welding. This procedure should
detail the precautions necessary for the prevention of electric shock to the operator and others
and also consider the design and installation of the equipment.
Figure 17. Unattended electrode holder
An electrode holder is left unattended.
This is poor practice as it increases the risk ofelectric shock to either the welder or other
workers in the area, due to an inadvertentcontact with the electrode and the work bench.
The assessment of procedures and equipment as part of this project revealed that the
procedures were not sufficiently detailed and that the quality of the welding equipment was
generally poor and that a number of deficiencies exist.
Only 51% of operations have any form of documented safe welding procedure at all and only
14% consider the design of the welding equipment in that procedure.
Only 43% of sites adopted safe welding practices and only 39% of sites had adopted AS1674.2 as a basis for safe welding practices.
To ensure that the welding equipment remains in a serviceable condition it is necessary to
periodically test that the equipment is safe. AS 1674.2 details the tests necessary and the
recommended frequency of those tests. In 66% of cases the mine carries out these tests at the
required intervals.
The continued use of damaged equipment increases the risk of electric shock to the user. At
47% of sites the welding equipment that was in use was damaged in some way. This damage
ranged from cracked electrode holders up to the case of the welder being damaged such that it
had been held together with tape.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 30
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
34/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 18. Damaged electrode holder
This handpiece is damaged and should bereplaced.
Figure 19. Damaged connections
The connections to the welder have been
replaced but the original defective connectionshave been left connected to the terminal.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 31
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
35/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 20. Damaged supply cable
The power lead of the welding machine has suffered insulation damageand has been repaired with PVC tape.
A common practice within the industry is to locate the welding machine in a convenient
position and reticulate the welding leads throughout the building as necessary. In 13% of
these cases the return lead of the welder is permanently connected to the building frame. This
practice is not consistent with the requirements of AS 1674.2 and can seriously affect the safe
earthing of other electrical equipment in the building.
Figure 21. Return lead connected to building
The return lead of the welding machine is permanently connected to thebuilding frame.
This practice is not consistent with the requirements of AS1647.2 and hasthe risk of adversely affecting the safe earthing of electrical equipment.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 32
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
36/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
The output circuit of welding equipment is sufficient to inflict a serious shock. The DMR has
released safety alerts in the past recommending the use of VRDs as a means of limiting the
open circuit voltage of a welding machine to a safe level. The adoption of VRDs to welding
equipment has been adopted at 60% of mine sites but at most sites the function of the VRD is
not tested.
Figure 22. Well fitted out welding machine
A well fitted out welding machine.
The environment in which the welder will be operating has beenconsidered. The welder is located inside a stainless steel enclosure andthe unit is well elevated to prevent water ingress from washing downactivities.
The VRD is visible at the top of the unit.
The presence of water when welding operations are being carried out greatly increases the
risk of electric shock.
Figure 23. Welding in damp areas
These workers are standing in water whilecarrying out welding operations.
This practice greatly increases the risk ofelectric shock to both the welder and theassistant.
AS1674.2 details precautions to be taken when
welding in damp locations.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 33
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
37/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
49% of Mines have safe welding procedures
39% of Mines comply with AS 1674.2
14% of Mines consider AS1966.1
14% of Mines consider AS1966.2
66% of Mines test welding equipment every 3 months
8% of Mines overhaul welding equipment every 2 years
65% of Mines require the use of VRDs
25% of Mines test VRD units
43% of Mines apply basic welding practices
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0
Figure 24. Welding statistics
Recommendation 12. All mines should review their welding practicesto ensure that they comply with the requirements of AS 1674.2. Theyshould also require the use of equipment that is in a fit for purposestate, and VRD units should be fitted to the output of welding machineswhere the voltage is above extra low voltage.
8.11Site compliance inspections
8.11.1 Risk of direct contact
The risk of electric shock by direct contact is very serious. It was found during the
assessment project that 62% of mining operations had an identifiable risk of direct contact
somewhere on the site. AS/NZS 3000 defines direct contact as contact with a conductor or
conductive part that is live in normal service.
Preventive measures against direct contact are defined in AS/NZS 3000 as:
Insulation
Barriers or enclosures
Obstacles Placing out of reach
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 34
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
38/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.1.1 Enclosure locking
AS 3000 requires that live parts be inside enclosures or behind barriers that provide a degree
of protection of at least IP2X as defined in AS1939. 17% of all the enclosures inspected had a
risk of direct contact due to the enclosure not being locked when live parts are exposed.
Figure 25. Enclosure that is not normally locked
This enclosure is not normally locked.
The terminals inside are live in normal serviceand represent a significant risk of electric shockdue to direct contact.
There were no signs warning of the presence oflive parts.
Figure 26. Enclosure with exposed live terminals
This enclosure is not normally locked.
Live parts are readily accessible when the enclosure is opened.
This presents an increased risk of electric shock due to direct contact withlive conductors.
It also increases the risk of injury to persons who open the enclosurewhilst it is in operation due to arc blast when the switchgear is operating.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 35
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
39/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.1.2 Internal control functions
Enclosures that have internal reset or control functions that are located in the vicinity of live
parts present an increased risk of direct contact due to the frequency of exposure to the hazard
by the person operating the equipment. It was found that 26% of enclosures have some form of
internal control function.
Figure 27. Enclosure with internal start function
It is necessary to open this enclosure to start the drive.
Note that the start pushbutton is located inside near unshroudedterminals located within the enclosure and on the door.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 36
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
40/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.1.3 Missing pole fillers
Pole fillers are used to blank off unused circuit breaker positions in distribution boards. When
these are not in place there is a risk of electric shock due to direct contact. The risk of electric
shock when these pole fillers are not fitted is high due to the action of operating the circuit
breakers, and the close proximity of an operators finger to the live parts when operatingadjacent circuit breakers. The inspection of enclosures on site revealed that pole fillers were
missing from 20% of enclosures that required them.
Figure 28. Distribution board with missing pole fillers
The distribution board has missing pole fillers.
Figure 29. Distribution board constructed on site
This distribution board has been manufacturedin situ. The positions where there are no circuit
breakers fitted are not blanked off and live partsare easily accessible.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 37
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
41/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 30. Distribution board with missing pole fillers
Missing pole fillers allow inadvertent contact withelectrical terminals through the opening. Itpresents a high risk due to the action ofoperating the circuit breakers.
Figure 31. Distribution board with several pole fillers
missing
An area of the distribution board has several pole fillers missing. Thelive parts are visible and an electric shock in this instance isforeseeable.
Recommendation 13. Mine sites should undertake an audit process toidentify risks of direct contact, have them rectified and include provisions
for identification of these issues in the mine maintenance scheme.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 38
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
42/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.2 Risk of indirect contact
AS/NZS 3000 defines electric shock due to indirect contact as contact with a conductive part
that is not normally live but becomes live under fault conditions (due to insulation failure or
some other cause). Preventive measures against indirect contact are:
Automatic disconnection of supply
Use of Class II equipment
Electrical Separation
8.11.2.1 Earth bonds
When an electrical enclosure has equipment mounted on the door, there must be an earth
bond from the enclosure to the door. This is to prevent a difference of potential between the
door and the enclosure in the case of a fault occurring. Inspections revealed that earth bonds
were missing from 8% of enclosures that had electrical equipment mounted on the door.
Figure 32. Enclosure door with earth bond not connected
The earth bond has been left off this door. Thereis a risk of electric shock due to indirect contactdue to a possible difference of potential between
the enclosure and the door should a fault occur.
8.11.2.2 Disconnected earths
One form of protection against indirect contact is the automatic disconnection of the supply
in case of a fault occurring between live parts and earth. In order for this protection to be
effective all conductive parts of the installation must be effectively earthed.
Figure 33. Disconnected earth conductors
The earth conductors have been leftdisconnected. This means that there may besome equipment in the field that is no longerearthed. When equipment is not earthed there isa possibility that electrical protection systemswill be ineffective.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 39
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
43/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.2.3 Earthing of conductive parts
AS/NZS 3000 requires that all conductive parts of an installation be earthed to protect against
differences of potential due to a fault.
Figure 34. Metal glands in plastic enclosure
The switch is not the correct type for terminating
armoured cables.For all parts of the installation to be earthed theglands and the armouring must be effectivelyearthed.
The risk of electric shock due to indirect contactis increased if the extraneous conductive partsare not effectively earthed.
Recommendation 14. Mines sites should review all electrical installationsto ensure that the earthing requirements of AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 are met.
8.11.2.4 Earth leakage protection
AS/NZS 3000 requires that RCD units be fitted for the protection of socket outlets and
lighting circuits where there is an elevated risk. In 8% of circuits containing socket outletsand 55% of lighting circuits RCD protection was not present.
Figure 35. Control station with socket outlet fitted
The enclosure has had a socket outlet fitted to the outside.
The socket outlet had been fitted as an addition sometime after the originalinstallation. It had no RCD protection, which increases the risk of electricshock due to indirect contact.
Recommendation 15. All mines should consider the fitting of RCDs to
all lighting circuits, socket outlets and control circuits to field devices thatoperate at low voltage.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 40
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
44/104
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
45/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.2 Installation
Electrical equipment needs to be installed in accordance with Australian Standards and good
engineering practice. The equipment should be installed in a manner that does not
compromise the design of the equipment.
Figure 37. Distribution board with top cover left off
The installation of this distribution board has not beencompleted.
The top cover has not been fitted, so there is a sizeable gapat the top of the board.
There is a risk of electric shock due to inadvertent contactwith live parts through the opening at the top of theenclosure.
Figure 38. Cable duct with no cover fitted
The duct at the top of the switchboard has nocover fitted. This presents an increased risk ofelectric shock due to insulation damage.
AS/NZS 3000 requires that all conductorshave single insulation installed in a conduit orduct.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 42
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
46/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 39. Cables in flexible conduit entering enclosure
The flexible conduit has been pushed through the opening in the panelwithout regard to proper glanding.
Some of the cables have suffered damage and at the lower end of thepanel the damage is such that the conductors are visible.
Figure 40. Unglanded cables entering enclosure
These cables have not been glandedcorrectly.
The IP rating of the enclosure has beencompromised by the use of the rubber flaparound the cables.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 43
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
47/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.2.1 Installation (IP rating)
Electrical enclosures should be appropriately IP rated according to the location in which they
will be installed.
Figure 41. Paper used to blank holes in panel
The control panel has had some openings inthe front panel covered with paper and tape.This is not an effective form of IP protection.
Figure 42. Well designed local control station
An installation where the environmentalconditions have been considered in theselection and installation of the equipment.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 44
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
48/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.2.2 Installation (location of equipment)
Electrical equipment should be installed in a location that will not present an increased risk.
AS/NZS 3000 details locations where certain types of equipment are prohibited from
installation.
Figure 43. Switchboard adjacent to wash tub
This switchboard is near a wash tub. Thelocation is not suitable for electrical equipmentdue to the high risk of people being wet whenoperating electrical equipment.
Figure 44. Building with services
A building column within a workshop.
The column has been used to mount the
necessary services for the workshop.
The socket outlets are close to the water andair services.
The socket outlets are not weatherproofunless the plug that is connected is aweatherproof type.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 45
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
49/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 45. Bath house pump
The installation of the pump on the bath housefloor is not fit for purpose.
It is located in an area which is regularlyhosed down and is not suitably IP rated for
this location.
Figure 46. Dam pump
This pump was installed when the water levelwas much lower than shown.
A workman must stand in the water in order tooperate the local isolator.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 46
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
50/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.2.3 Installation (main switchrooms and switchyards)
Switchrooms and switchyards are important items of electrical equipment due to the
switching of high energy sources within the enclosures. As such they have some special
requirements and should be maintained to a high standard.
Figure 47. Switchroom with doors bolted shut
Access to switchrooms is important in order toexit in case of emergency. AS/NZS 3000requires that there be two exits that can beopened from the inside without the use of akey or tool.
This switchroom has sustained damage to theexit doors. The doors are nailed shutpreventing anyone from exiting in anemergency.
Figure 48. Switchroom with door that opens inward
The doorway to this switchroom opens to the inside making it difficult to exitfrom the inside in an emergency.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 47
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
51/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 49. Elevated substation installation
Many mine sites are supplied with electric power by means of poletop transformer installations.
This installation is laid out in a way that the safe isolation of the HVfuses would be difficult.
Figure 50. Switchroom
This switchroom is in need of maintenance toallow ready access.
The door is hard to open due to the build up ofdebris around the switchroom.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 48
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
52/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.2.4 Installation (Signs)
Requirements for signs to be fitted to all electrical installations are detailed in AS/NZS 3000,
AS 3007 and the legislation. Adequate signs are necessary in order to warn of the presence
and the dangers of electricity. The assessment project revealed that 73% of electrical
installations at coal mining sites do not comply with the Coal Mines (General) RegulationsClause 29 and that 70% of sites in the metalliferous and extractive sectors do not have the
required signs.
Figure 51. Enclosure with no signs
There are no signs attached to the electricalenclosures. These enclosures should havesigns stating the presence and danger ofelectricity and the highest voltage within thepanel.
Figure 52. Enclosure with paper signs
The use of homemade paper signs does notadequately cover the requirements ofsignage in AS/NZS 3000 or the legislation.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 49
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
53/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 53. Sign on switchyard fence
The sign on the switchyard fence is no longerlegible.
Figure 54. MCC with a high standard of signage.
A switchboard that has been well fitted outwith signs.
The type of signs that should be located at all electrical installations are: Sign to indicate the presence and dangers of electricity and the highest voltage within the
enclosure
Sign to indicate the steps to take in case of a fire occurring on the electrical equipment
Sign to indicate the procedure for resuscitating a victim of electric shock
Sign to indicate the circuits controlled by the equipment
Recommendation 16. All mines should review the signs and notices at all
electrical installations on site to ensure that the requirements of the Coal Mines(General) Regulations, AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007 are complied with.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 50
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
54/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.3 Commissioning
Electrical equipment must be installed and commissioned in accordance with AS/NZS 3000.
Section 6 Testing and Verification details the inspection and tests required for new and
modified installations.
Figure 55. Main switch with smaller conductors
The installation of a replacement main switchis unsuitable. The existing conductors are toolarge for the terminals of the new switch sosmaller lengths of conductor have been usedto connect the switch.
Inappropriate installation and commissioningprocedures means this issue has not beenidentified.
8.11.3.4 Use
Electrical equipment should always be used in accordance with the equipment design and
good engineering practice. Equipment safety should never be compromised by bypassing
functions or protection systems.
Figure 56. Badly rusted enclosure
An electrical enclosure that is badly corroded.
It is possible to place your finger through thehole. Note: The power was isolated when thisphotograph was taken.
Equipment should not be allowed todeteriorate.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 51
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
55/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 57. Contactors wedged in
Wooden wedges have been used to hold contactors in theclosed position.
8.11.3.4.1 Use (access to switchboards)
AS/NZS 3000 requires there be clear access to all switchboards.
Figure 58. Access to distribution board is restricted
This distribution board cannot be opened due to the practice of storingequipment in front of the switchboard.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 52
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
56/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.5 Maintenance
In order for electrical equipment to remain in a fit for purpose condition, maintenance must
be effective and appropriate to the task. The maintenance must consider the ongoing
compliance with AS/NZS 3000 and AS 3007.
Figure 59. Switchboard cell held with tape
A section of this switchboard has had somerepairs carried out.
The cover of the panel no longer fits, as thenew equipment is larger in size. The cover isheld on with insulation tape.
Figure 60. Unloomed conductors in an enclosure
The wiring in the enclosure is not contained within ducting or ina wiring harness.
There are no identification numbers on wiring making faultfinding difficult.
When maintenance practices are such that enclosures are keptin this condition it indicates that plant standards are unsuitablefor ensuring equipment is kept in a fit for purpose condition.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 53
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
57/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
Figure 61. Stray wires in an enclosure
The condition of the enclosure is an indicator of a lack of maintenance.The wiring is not restrained or marked and redundant equipment has notbeen removed.
Figure 62. Enclosure that dust has entered
The enclosure is not suitable for the environment that it is installed in.
The environment is very dusty and, although the enclosure may havebeen dustproof when installed, a lack of maintenance has seen the sealsdeteriorate.
The result is that a significant amount of dust now enters the enclosureand the installation is no longer in a fit for purpose condition.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 54
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
58/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
8.11.3.6 Disposal
When electrical equipment is no longer required (become redundant) it needs to be managed
so that it does not present a risk of electric shock.
Figure 63. Redundant cables
These cables are redundant. They have been disconnected and left tohang under the cable tray.
This practice increases the risk of electric shock due to the redundantcables being inadvertently re-energised.
Figure 64. Redundant cable poked behind adjacent cable
The redundant cable has not been handledwell. It has been cut off and placed behindthe adjacent cable.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 55
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
59/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
9 Legislation
9.1 Differences between mining and non mining electrical installations
Electrical installationsin mining are not similar to mainstream industry and have
traditionally been regulated under a different legislative model than the "ordinary" workplace.
There are many situations in mining where electrical installations differ markedly from those
normally encountered in the non mining workplace.
Some are listed here:
Installations tend to be temporary, and mining operations are continuously moving.
Transportable / relocatable high voltage substations.
Earthing installations at the bottom of open cuts where effective connection to the mass ofearth is exceedingly difficult.
Frequent use of explosives with electrically initiated detonators.
Very large diesel powered mobile machines with on board generating equipment and highvoltage electric drive traction, with attendant fire and malfunction risks.
Processing and beneficiation plants where electrical apparatus is continuously wet andexposed to conductive and corrosive mineral slurries and concentrates.
High voltages (now up to 22 kV) reticulated inflexible cables to very large mobilemachines.
Particular earthing requirements for trailing cable fed mobile machines.
Overhead lines on sites with material stock piles, large earth moving equipment and largedump trucks (generally larger than standard road vehicles) where the height of the ground
below the line may be subject to change.
High voltage cables installed where persons and machinery can contact them. High voltage cables installed in confined roadways underground where probability of
exposure is very high, and possibility of retreat from danger is limited.
High voltage installations where persons are routinely required to stand knee deep in mudand water to maintain and operate them.
Large high powered machines supplied with trailing cables, where free steered vehiclesrun in close proximity.
High powered machinery controlled with radio remote controls in restricted space, withpersons closely concentrated around the machine.
Very deep shaft vertical and slope winders conveying large numbers of persons. Some other issues unique to mining that impact on electrical engineering safety are:
Office buildings and workshop / store complexes are on site and staffed by the samepeople who operate the mine. Machinery and plant migrates from store to mine to
workshop etc. It would be impractical to have different legislation for electrical
installations for different parts of the mine.
Some mines (including office and workshop) are powered only by on site privatelyowned generating plant. Such installations are best regulated by specific mining
legislation.
Some mines that begin life as open cut operations later become underground mines.
Many mines are remote from population centres, making it difficult to access the licensedtradesmen and consulting engineers with particular expertise.
NSW Department of Mineral Resources Page 56
8/14/2019 Electric Shock Final Report
60/104
Electric Shock Prevention Project
9.2 Legislative models