of 25 /25
Elastomeric Impression Materials Part 1 Dr. Noland Naidoo

Elastomeric Impression Materials Part 1 Dr. Noland Naidoo

Embed Size (px)

Text of Elastomeric Impression Materials Part 1 Dr. Noland Naidoo

  • Slide 1
  • Elastomeric Impression Materials Part 1 Dr. Noland Naidoo
  • Slide 2
  • Classification Impression Materials Non-elasticPlasterCompound Impression wax ZnO- EugenolElastic Aqueous Hydrocolloids Agar (Reversible) Alginate (Irreversible) Non-aqueous Elastomer PolysulfideSiliconesCondensationAdditionPolyether
  • Slide 3
  • Introduction Rubberlike elastic impression materials Currently referred to as elastomers or elastomeric impression materials. Elastomeric material consists of large molecules or polymers that are joined by a small amount of cross- linking Cross linking form a three-dimensional network The amount of cross-linking determines the stiffness and elastic behaviour of the material
  • Slide 4
  • Requirements Accuracy- must reproduce the entire surface upon which the prosthesis to be made will fit Elasticity- low elastic modulus and high elastic range Dimensional stability- the way in which accuracy varies with time after recording the impression Ease of handling Good tear strength Non-toxic and non-irritating Compatible with die and model materials
  • Slide 5
  • Classification Impression Materials Non-elasticPlasterCompound Impression wax ZnO- EugenolElastic Aqueous Hydrocolloids Agar (Reversible) Alginate (Irreversible) Non-aqueous Elastomer PolysulfideSiliconesCondensationAdditionPolyether
  • Slide 6
  • Classification The ADA considers three types of elastomeric material and each type can be further divided into four viscosity classes: light body medium body heavy body putty
  • Slide 7
  • Polysulphides Supplied in the form of two pastes- a base and a catalyst Examples: Permlastic (SDS/Kerr), Coe-Flex, Omniflex (GC America) The base paste consists of: Polysulphide polymer Suitable filler (titanium dioxide or lithopone) Plasticizer ( eg. dibutyl phthalate) Sulphur small amount that enhances reaction ( catalyst)
  • Slide 8
  • Polysulphides The catalyst paste: Lead dioxide Plasticizer- chlorinated parafin Approx same amount of filler as in base paste Oleic or stearic acid- retarders- control the rate of setting
  • Slide 9
  • Polysulphides Must be used with a special tray Reasonable tear strength and good elastic properties Unpleasant odor and taste Work well in the presence of moisture- moderately hydrophilic Used commonly for crown and bridge impressions Casts should be poured within 24hrs of impression but not immediately as to allow for full elastic recoil Reported incidences of allergic reaction to patients sensitive to latex Impressions made from polysulfide materials should be poured within 30 minutes following removal from the mouth, because in the first hour they undergo 50% of their 24-hour shrinkage.
  • Slide 10
  • Polysulphides AdvantagesDisadvantages Good tear strengthPoor dimension stability Good elasticityOffensive odor Low costStains clothing Long setting time
  • Slide 11
  • Polysulphides
  • Slide 12
  • Silicones Condensation silicone impression material Supplied in a base paste and low viscosity liquid Examples: Speedex (Coltene/Whaledent), Accoe (GC America) McCabe and Walls, 2008
  • Slide 13
  • Silicones Condensation silicone impression material Setting characteristics more favourable than polysulphide Setting time shorter and elasticity developed earlier Very hydrophobic- repelled by water or saliva therefore necessary to dry areas of the mouth for an acurate impression Adequate tear resistance for most purposes Models must be poured as soon as possible after impression recordings The increased use of addition silicones has lead to a gradual decline in the use of addition silicone
  • Slide 14
  • Silicones Condensation silicone impression material AdvantagesDisadvantages Moderate tear strengthPoor dimensional stability Good working timePoor wetability Good setting time
  • Slide 15
  • Silicones Addition silicone impression material Also supplied as two paste The hydroxyl group from the condensation silicone is replaced by vinyl group Examples: Extrude, Take 1 (SDS/Kerr), President (Coltene/Whaledent), Express, Imprint II (3M ESPE), Examix, Exaflex (GC America), Reprosil, Aquasil, Hydrosil (Dentsply/Caulk)
  • Slide 16
  • Silicones Addition silicone impression material Properties are similar to condensation silicones They have near ideal elasticity with adequate tear resistance and setting characteristics The use of the light body and putty enables accurate impressions to be recorded Dimensional stability is greater than condensation silicones Also inherently hydrophobic therefore a dry field is required during impression recording Although surface active agents have been added to newer materials to make it less hydrophobic
  • Slide 17
  • Silicones Addition silicone impression material Handling characteristics similar to condensation silicone Routinely used for crown and bridge impressions Preferred to condensation silicones due to its dimensional stability.
  • Slide 18
  • Silicones Addition silicone impression material AdvantagesDisadvantages Excellent dimensional stabilityHydrogen gas release Good tear strength Inhibition of setting by sulphur containing materials Good working and setting timeExpensive Excellent wettabilityStiff Automix system
  • Slide 19
  • Silicones Addition silicone impression material
  • Slide 20
  • Polyethers Also supplied as two pastes and automix Examples: Impregum F, Permadyne (3M ESPE), Polyjel (Dentsply/Caulk) McCabe and Walls, 2008
  • Slide 21
  • Polyethers Tear resistance and elasticity approaching that of silicones Relatively rigid when set It is dimensionally stable under relatively low humidity conditions The set material is hydrophilic and absorbs moisture under high humidity conditions Can record accurate impression even when perfect moisture control is not achieved
  • Slide 22
  • Polyethers The major disadvantage is its rigidity during its set state- but this is also an advantage, e.g. when taking impressions for implants AdvantagesDisadvantages Excellent wettabillityPoor tear strength Good dimensional stability Short working and setting time Stiff Difficult to disinfect Expensive Patient sensitivity
  • Slide 23
  • Polyethers
  • Slide 24
  • Comparison of the properties of elastomeric impression material McCabe and Walls, 2008
  • Slide 25
  • End of Part 1