2
EITC Insufficient Perm the alt. The EITC is not an exclusive program and has inconclusive results. Guy Sorman, 2!!. "#hy $ot a $egative Income Tax% & Replace the welfare state with a cash subsidy for the The EITC may resem(le )riedman*s idea superficially, (ut it is +uite different. It doesn’t replace any welfare programs; instead, it adds another layer to them, utte failing to reduce government bureaucracy. And though it is a cash payment, as riedman would have suggested, it goes only to the wor!ing poor; the unemployed continue to receive in"!ind support, such as food stamps. The rationale (ehind this distinction (et een the or-ing and non or-ing poor is that the ta# credit is supposedly an incentive to wor! that is, if you or-, you get a credit to supplement your ages, but if you stop wor!ing, you lose both your wages and the credit. $tudie of the EITC, however, have been inconclusive. Employed single mothers do seem inclined to -eep or-ing once they receive the tax credit, instead of turning to married omen, (y contrast, sometimes stop or-ing once their hus(ands get the cr on top of their salaries. The alleged incentive to wor! is thus not a decisive reason to !eep the EITC.

EITC Insufficient

  • Upload
    stan

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

...

Citation preview

EITC Insufficient

Perm the alt. The EITC is not an exclusive program and has inconclusive results.

Guy Sorman, 2011. Why Not a Negative Income Tax? - Replace the welfare state with a cash subsidy for the poor.

The EITC may resemble Friedmans idea superficially, but it is quite different. It doesnt replace any welfare programs; instead, it adds another layer to them, utterly failing to reduce government bureaucracy. And though it is a cash payment, as Friedman would have suggested, it goes only to the working poor; the unemployed continue to receive in-kind support, such as food stamps. The rationale behind this distinction between the working and nonworking poor is that the tax credit is supposedly an incentive to workthat is, if you work, you get a credit to supplement your wages, but if you stop working, you lose both your wages and the credit. Studies of the EITC, however, have been inconclusive. Employed single mothers do seem inclined to keep working once they receive the tax credit, instead of turning to welfare; married women, by contrast, sometimes stop working once their husbands get the credit on top of their salaries. The alleged incentive to work is thus not a decisive reason to keep the EITC.