19
1 The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model Rhetoric and its participation in Information Architecture for the Web By Omar Sosa Tzec Profesor Hanno Ehses Visual Rhetoric Master in Information Design Universidad de las Américas, Puebla

Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

1

The Web RhetoricTriangle ModelRhetoric and its participation in

Information Architecture for the Web

By Omar Sosa TzecProfesor Hanno Ehses

Visual RhetoricMaster in Information DesignUniversidad de las Américas, Puebla

Page 2: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

2

As mentioned in the Rhetorical Handbook by Ehses et al. (1996), “Rhetoric is a vocabulary which describes

the effective, persuasive use of speech… is not a set of

fixed stylistic rules, but an open description of the pat-

terns and processes of communication. The rhetorician

chooses a style, or a mode of appeal, which will be pow-

erful and appropriate in given situation.” In addition,

the figures of speech are elements considered by Ehses

et al. (1996) as a departure from the ordinary use of

language. These figures are categorized into tropes and

schemes. The first ones alter the customary reference

of signs, and the latter alter their normal arrangement

(Ehses et al., 1996). In this context, the word sign refers

to an entity, not autonomous, neither self-contained

entity nor physical object, but only exist in relation to

other signs (Ehses et al., 1996). In a simple way, a sign is

nothing but a unit of meaning; therefore, constructs ev-

ery communication process (i.e. the speech). According

to Ehses (1989) the major (rhetoric) figures are grouped

in figures of contrast, figures of resemblance, figures

of contiguity and figures of gradation. Metaphor (from

resemblance figures), Metonymy and Synecdoche (from

contiguity figures), and Hyperbole (from the gradation

group), are some of the major figures specially used in

graphic design.

By other hand, the Information Architect concept was

introduced by Richard Salwurman (1996) to define a

new discipline that refers to the professionals with the

purpose is to take complex information and to conduct

it to certain audience in a simple form as possible. In an

explicit way, Saulwurman (1996) defines the Informa-

tion Architect as: 1) The individual who organize inherit

patterns in data, making clear the complex. 2) An indi-

vidual that creates the structure or map of information

allowing others to find their own paths to knowledge. 3)

The emerging professional occupation of 21st century

that cares about the needs, the clarity, human knowl-

edge and the science of information organization.

Certainly, with the growing of the Web, the roll of the in-

formation architects results relevant. In the professional

websites construction, the information architect has the

Introduction

Page 3: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

3

responsibility of carrying all the process such that client

requirements should be accomplished (i.e. some com-

pany or organization) but at the same time to reach the

objective of using the website as an effective communi-

cation with the user (i.e. the individual that navigate the

site). In this process, the information architecture takes

new definitions; according to Rosenfeld et al. (2002),

they define it as: 1) The combination of organizing,

labeling and navigation schemes within an informa-

tion system. 2) The structural design of an information

space to easy the accomplishing of tasks and intuitive

access to content. 3) The art and science of structuring

and classify websites and intranets for helping people

to handle information. 4) An emergent discipline and

practitioners community focused to carry the principles

of design and architecture to the digital context. In not

so formal terms, Shiple (2005) refers to information

architecture as the founding for a great web design and

as the blueprint which it bases the construction of all

elements of a website.

Information architecture is a process that is supported

in the capacities of abstract structuring of information

by the architect and his experience about the websites

constructions and his understanding of communica-

tion which the user according the needs of the latter.

However, all architecture process has certain common

steps (Van Dijck, 2003; Shiple, 2005) which are: 1)

Identifying the business goals. 2) Identifying site goals.

3) Identifying the potential users, their categorization

and requirements analysis. 4) Determining content and

functionality. 5) To elaborate organizational schemes,

categorization and labeling to determine the navigation-

al structure. 6) User interface design with wire frames

and final layout elaboration. These steps with their cor-

respondent methods allow the increasing construction

and evaluation of a website taking in count the business

goals and needs from the different categorized users

types.

Page 4: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

4

Therefore, it can be seen that the constant growing con-

struction of websites need the effective communication

skills of the information architect. However, there’s and

important fact about the information architects: they

are handling with some new kind of speech, the one that

hoards all the possible listeners that relates the poten-

tial users and others that fortunately can be part of the

audience (i.e. to navigate by some cause). This new kind

of speech needs effective tools to succeed. The basic

and primarily tool involved is rhetoric. The rhetoric of

websites is somehow an special kind: the web rhetoric;

this new rhetoric considers all the statements estab-

lished for the classic one, but an appropriate mapping to

this field is done, so the information architect, as leader

in website construction process, should handle in mind

with all these rhetoric aspects, which he does, even if he

is not explicitly considering them.

The web rhetoric is inherent in the information

architecture process by its three appealing modes:

logos, pathos and ethos. For each one, the information

architect should stress the quantity enough to reveal the

persuasive for conducting a particular audience. Also,

the schemes and tropes presented in classic rhetoric are

used. The latter often applied in the front-end character-

istics that users will watch in their screens.

During the information architecture process the three

appeals of rhetoric conforms the navigational structure

and hoarding content elements. The three appealing

modes are the basic pillars that support the construc-

tion of a website to function as an persuasive speech; if

the speech is persuasive enough, the audience will listen

carefully (i.e. navigate the site appropriately) and that

will come the repeating of the speech in some future as

result (i.e. coming back to the site). The adequate con-

struction of the speech allow s the audience to conform

patterns that will facilitate and understand how to listen

to these kind of speeches; in other words, users gain

knowledge, the eventually will have the skill of navigate

websites in the way they can accomplish their tasks suc-

cessfully.

Web Rhetoric

Page 5: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

5

“The web rhetoric is inherent in the

information architecture process by

its three appealing modes: logos,

pathos and ethos. For each one, the

information architect should stress

the quantity enough to reveal the

persuasive for conducting a particu-

lar audience.”

Page 6: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

6

The information architecture process in the rhetoric

process can be modeled by the rhetoric triangle. In

each corner of the triangle is positioned one appeal of

rhetoric, each one can take a minimum value (i.e. set to

zero) to its highest value (e.g. set to one for all of tem),

so this triangle lives in a three dimensional space such

its inclination determines the stressing corresponding to

each rhetoric appeals.

When information architecture starts, the rhetoric

triangle lies on a plane (e.g. x-y plane from the Cartesian

three dimensional space) and while the information ar-

chitecture goes forward the triangle starts to elevate (in

space), according to the stressing of each rhetoric appeal

considered by the information architect.

Web Rhetoric Triangle

Rhetoric web triangle in its initial state and the representa-tion of the same top value for each appealing mode.

�����

�����

������

��������

���������������

�����������������������

��������������

��������

������

����������������

����������������������

From raw data by client and user needs information architect starts to work with raw information and stressing the logos and ethos appeals. At the end of informa-tion architecture a final product is realesed which all the rhetoric appeals stressed somehow.

Page 7: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

7

As happens in information architecture, in the begin-

ning the data is raw, the business goals and potentials

users (and their needs) are identified. Before these hap-

pens the logos is the only one stressed. It has a consider-

able high. When the information architect already has

the first requirements mentioned before, the categori-

zation and labeling process plays an important part to

accomplish them. Is in this stage when the information

architect uses his skills as a speaker for the defined

audience; the information categorization and labeling

is done, so the ethos reflected by the maturity of the in-

formation architect is reflected in this point. Therefore,

the triangle corner that corresponds to the ethos arises

as well. Is important to mention that the elevation ethos

corner is not arbitrary at all, it is clear the information

architect is a person that understands and knows how

to build the speech, so a cognitive uniformity within

websites construction is inherent, even if there are many

professional that dedicates to this discipline.

Even when the information is navigationally structured,

it is no recommendable to release the speech, but it can

be done. Is in this case when a website is presented,

leaving almost all consideration about the pathos ap-

peal. If a website is presented in this way, the logos and

the ethos appeals are very stressed (i.e. elevate high)

and the pathos one could be null or very low. Besides, is

common to find in this cases some aspects related with

other kind of ethos, the one involved with the develop-

ment team of the tool used by the user to listen (i.e. web

browser), because each different tool has its own ethos

to display content as it can be the default typographies,

link coloring, etc.

Logos and Ethos

The ethos stressing is part of the iterative process of Information Architecture. Also pathos corner starts to elevate a little.

�������������������

�����

������

�����������������������

�����������������������

����������������

Page 8: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

8

Event if the logos and ethos are stressed previously,

the stressing possibilities for ethos haven’t reached the

highest. The ethos appeal is also related with the basic

characteristics attributed to content. Its important to

remember that web rhetoric has its own needs to be

persuasive. To control media synthesis is very important

for the information architect to reach all marked goals.

The right basic content design as can be web writing,

web legible typography selection and links coloring are

some supervised activities by the information architect

which reflects his ethos stressing, including the possible

members of the staff. Besides, whether it is only one

person doing all the work or well-conformed teams,

aspects inherent with layout design are part of the

ethos stressing also. Furthermore to present the user a

whole navigation and content structure, the information

architect must know how to apply rhetoric tropes and

schemes (e.g. metaphor).

This stage involves the pathos appeal in some tradeoff

about the selection of content elements that reflects

the emotion and mood that corresponds both site goals

and users hoarding. Its important to mention that

both of them are constrained by the actual technology

capabilities and the user context; for example the ethos

stressing could found a top in its elevation because there

is not such technological tools that support informa-

tion architect first ideas and the pathos may be limited

so it is impossible to impact users with an astonishing

media element because they don’t have a high speed

connection or they have some special capabilities (e.g. blindness).

Pathos stressing is directly related with the usage of

images, sound and video. The images that elevates the

pathos corner are the ones that reflect emotions, so

this stressing can be incremented with images related

with people, even if they are realistic or not; also can be

considered any image that gets the right mood by con-

vention from the potential users. The same is applied to

sound and video, all is about the potential users percep-

tion and probably according to the company consider-

Ethos and Pathos

�����

������

������������

�������������

���������������

����������������

Pathos stressing will reflect some perceptions from the users, so positive reactions to their mood should be gained.

�����

��������������������������������������������������������

�����

������

Region corresponding to naviga-tional related rhetoric figures.

Page 9: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

9

ations. For this appeal is clear that more the information

architect indicates the interface and interaction design

team members to stress, the reduction of audience and

firm characterization of the users profile will be marked;

the potential users has their own conventionally percep-

tions, so the media reflected would provoke a negative

reaction to any kind of user not considered. Then it is

very important that pathos stressing should be well jus-

tified with the purpose of hoarding audience of potential

users, and to avoid the annoying of the speech.

The handling of tropes and schemes in pathos elevation

is also required. For this stressing, according to the con-

strains given by the context, the information architect

together with the interface and interaction designers can

determine how to apply correctly rhetoric figures to im-

pact the audience adequately, even with simple things. �����

�������������������������������������������������

�����

������

Region corresponding to expres-sive content related rhetoric figures.

Page 10: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

10

Example Analysis

The next illustrative example shows the different results

from stressing the appeals of rhetoric. In this case, a

personal site is constructed. After categorizing and la-

beling raw information a first structured site is present-

ed, hence logos is hiperstressed and no consideration on

design content is figured.

Logos stressed index web page.

Example of logos stressed inner web page.

Page 11: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

11

Following this structured, a first version of ethos (be-

sides the kind of content by being personal) is elabo-

rated. To stress the ethos, right selection of content

presentation is chosen, no metaphors decided to be

applied and the website is shown with its own identity

under the idea “conceive ideas”. A metaphor of a sperm

is done by a mouse figure and the site reflects the idea

of flux in its background. Also the iconization is related

with the conception evolution.

Ethos stressed index web page.

Example of ethos stressed inner web page.

Page 12: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

12

Considering a little more pathos aproach, a second

version of ethos stressed website is constructed. In this

case the basic button metaphor is used for the main

menu. The flavour of the website still the same, but a

more fresh identity is shown. Also some metaphors in

icon design are included, like a house to redirect to the

home page or an arrow with a ‘n’ to indicate de site map.

By other hand, a big ethos stressing can be seen in the

redesigning of the index page to give uniformity in the

cognitive navigation process.

Variation of ethos stressed index web page.

Example of variation on ethos stressed inner web page.

Page 13: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

13

For this example, pathos stressing was more content

related with bright colors and images of the individual

which the site refers to. These pictures should express

some kind of joy, soy they show this individual jumping.

For each section, the ethos and logos were attached by a

right selection of pictures; for example, people working

together for the homework section. Other fact was the

selection of rhetoric figures as can be seen in the links

section, where a picture of the individual an his friend is

used as a pun to the word “links”.

Pathos stressed index web page.

Example of pathos stressed inner web page.

Page 14: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

14

From the statements about rhetoric and Web, it can be

seen that the first one is attached with the communica-

tion process inside the second. The rhetoric triangle is

somehow implicit in every architecture process and all

web pages construction. Then, the information architect

creates a whole categorization of the possible eleva-

tions of each corner in the rhetoric triangle based on

his experience and maturity to handle with this new

media, understanding what are the features that should

be considered to seduce the expected individual that

will navigate the site in consideration. If the handling

of web speech is uniformly, then it is possible to make

a hypothesis about all websites that are related accord-

ing their persuasive intentions will have similar values

of stressing. So, the rhetoric triangle allows the visu-

alization of the categories of sites inside the Web and

furthermore, it can be used as a tool to express to the

client how rhetoric aspects influence in the architecture

process.

Discusion

Page 15: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

15

Conclusions

Web is involved with a new kind of speech and there-

fore, a new kind of rhetoric is presented, the web

rhetoric.

The information architect is a new kind of speaker that

understands his audience.

The rhetoric triangle brings the capability of under-

standing how of each of the rhetoric appeals could be

stressed and allows visualizing the relation of websites

inside the same category and what makes the difference

from others.

No matter how the Web will evolve as communication

medium, the rhetoric would be always present as an ef-

fective tool of architecture.

Page 16: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

16

Apendix: Screenshots Comparative

Ethos 1 Ethos 2 Pathos

Page 17: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

17

Page 18: Ehses & Tzec - The Web Rhetoric Triangle Model

18

Ehses, Hanno. Design and Rhetoric: An Analysis of Theatre Posters. Design Papers 4. Second printing.

Canada. 1989.

Ehses, Hanno, et al. Rhetorical Handbook. Depart-

ment of Visual Communication of Nova Scotia College.

Canada. 1996.

Rosenfeld, Lois; Morville, Peter. Information Archi-tecture for the World Wide Web. O’Reilly & Associates.

USA. 2002.

Saulwurman, Richard. Information Architects. Graphic

Press. USA. 1996.

Shiple, John. Information Architecture Manual. Wired

Digital.

URL: www.webmonkey.com. 2005.

Van Dijck, Peter. Information Architecture for Design-ers. Roto Vision. Switzerland. 2003.

References