31
Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp.

Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

Effective Accident Investigation

August 12, 2015Jim BrightRisk Engineering

Zurich Services Corp.

Page 2: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

2

Session goals & objectives

Understand some effects of worker injuries and losses. Understand that all accidents can be prevented. Instill the above beliefs and attitudes in all employees. Understand the significance of identifying and correcting at-

risk behaviors and conditions. Understand the need and value of conducting thorough and

accurate accident investigations. Understand the role of accountability in the safety process. Reduce accidents and protect employees which reduces

costs and expenses

Page 3: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

3

Meeting outline

By the end of this session, we want to:

Describe the reasons for conducting accident investigations Identify surface causes and root causes of accidents Learn about identifying (and correcting) unsafe behaviors and

conditions

But first...here’s a few examples of communication difficulties…

Page 4: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

4

How to fail a test (actual test responses)

Page 5: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

5

How to fail a test (actual test responses)

Page 6: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

6

How to fail a test (actual test responses)

Page 7: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

7

How to fail a test (actual test responses)

Page 8: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

8

What does an injury cost Hunter Douglas?

Direct Costs• Medical• Compensation

Indirect Costs• Time lost from work by injured• Loss in earning power• Lost time by fellow workers• Loss of efficiency due to disruption of team• Lost time by supervision• Cost of retraining and integration in a new

worker• Damage to tools and equipment• Failure to meet project deadlines• Overhead costs (while work was disrupted)

The proverbial iceberg

Page 9: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

Other costs to consider

• According to Zurich Claims, on average, workers with one to five years of experience represent 55.3% of all reported claims and 40.9% of the net incurred costs.

• Increased WC claim frequency and costs for any employer in 2010 and 2011 will affect experience modifications (Xmod) for a three-year period, 2012-2014.

• Increased Xmods can adversely affect financial objectives. • Due to relatively lower payroll trends in troubled economic times, a lost

time claim will have greater impact on an Xmod than in normal economic times.

• Replacing new hires who have been injured will also result in additional costs.

9

Page 10: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

10

Introduction to accident investigation

What is a “near miss” and what is an “accident”?

A NEAR MISS is a failure to meet acceptable standards or processes which creates a hazard where an incident has not occurred, but may or may not result in an accident.

An ACCIDENT is any unplanned and uncontrolled event that results in injury, illness, property damage, activity interruption, or environmental damage.

What do near misses and accidents have in common?

NEAR MISSES and ACCIDENTS are failures of processes, people, equipment, supplies or surroundings to behave or react as expected.

Page 11: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

11

Introduction to accident investigation

Accidents often result from a dangerous event or sequence of events that we fail to notice and correct until it is too late

Inherent

hazard

Trigger

antecedent

Event or

Sequence of

events

Damage

Injury

Illness

Loss of use, claim, or other

consequences

+ =

Near Miss

Accident

Causes Effects

Page 12: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

12

Paying attention to the “small stuff”

The Loss Producing Pyramid

300,000 At-Risk Behaviors/Unsafe Conditions

3,000 Near Misses

300 Medical Only

29 Lost Time

1 Fatal

Page 13: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

13

Introduction to accident investigation

Why investigate? Find the root cause(s) and correct them Prevent similar accidents Protect Hunter Douglas’ interests Fix the problem, but not place blame Improve behavior and hazard identification skills Increase data for trending analysis

When to start – immediately! Witness’s memories fade; people come and go Evidence and clues are lost or moved Information is lost or becomes inaccurate

Page 14: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

14

A. Gather information1. Care for the injured & secure the scene2. Collect the facts

B. Analyze the facts3. Develop sequence of events4. Determine cause

C. Implement solutions5. Recommendations (lessons learned/corrective actions)6. Write the report

Then measure accident rate to assess effectiveness

Six steps for conducting an accident investigation

Page 15: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

15

Step 1 – Care for the injured & secure the scene

Your primary goal is to care for the injured and to begin gathering accident information that can give critical clues into the causes associated with the accident:

Provide first aid for injured On scene evaluation Advanced medical care/911 Transport for medical care to designated

clinic for treatment, or to the employee’spredesignated doctor

Control existing hazards Prevent further injuries Get more help if needed Preserve evidence

Page 16: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

16

Step 2 – Collect the facts

This step requires collection of pertinent facts about the accident to determine the cause of injury:

Who is involved (injured and witnesses) When did it happen An accounting of what happened Where did it happen Obtain employee statement Obtain eyewitness statement(s) Diagrams of the accident and body parts affected

Page 17: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

17

Step 3 – Develop the sequence of events

In this step, use the information collected to document the events prior to, during, and after the accident

Questions to consider: What project was the injured or affected employee working on before

the accident or near miss happened? Exactly where did it happen? What was the employee doing when the accident or near miss

occurred? The detailed narrative will allow a reader to envision the sequence of

events leading up to the time of the accident that resulted in the employee being injured.

Page 18: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

18

Step 4 – Determine the Cause(s)

Inadequate training plan

No accountability policy No inspection policy

No discipline procedures

Outdated hazcom programNo orientation process

Inadequate training

Fails to enforceLack of time

Inadequate labeling

CutsBurns

La

ck

of

vis

ion

Strains

No

mis

sio

n s

tate

me

nt

Direct Cause of Injury

Surface Causes

RootCauses

Fact: 96% of accidents are caused by at-risk behaviors4% of accidents caused by unsafe conditions

Source: DuPont Chemicals

Page 19: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

System Elements

INPUTS INTERACTION OUTPUTS• People• Equipment• Material• Environment

Consider your investigation to be a system analysis. All incidents can be analyzed by one or a combination of four elements (or PEME):PeopleEquipmentMaterialEnvironment

Page 20: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

20

Step 4 – Determine the cause(s)

Direct cause(s) of the accident

This is usually the injury itself, which may take the form of:

Acoustic – hearing loss Chemical burns - corrosive, toxic, flammable, reactive Electrical burns/shock - low/high voltage Kinetic (strains, STF) - energy transferred from impact Mechanical (struck by) - components that move Potential - "stored energy" in objects Radiant - ionizing and non-ionizing radiation Thermal - excessive heat, extreme cold

Page 21: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

21

Step 4 – Determine the cause(s)

Surface cause(s) or contributing factor(s) of the accident

Specific/unique hazardous conditions and/or unsafe behaviors that may have produced or contributed to the accident, such as:

Unguarded equipment, broken or dull tools, spilled liquid, defective or missing personal protective equipment (PPE)

Horseplay, too much work, failure to train, failure to observe or enforce procedures and rules

If you're pointing at a person, behavior, or thing, then it's probably a contributing factor

Page 22: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

22

Step 4 – Determine the cause(s)

Root cause(s) of the accident

Program design weaknesses - Failure to effectively develop safety policies, programs, plans, processes, procedures, practices Inadequate or no: training, orientation, job hazard analysis,

coaching/discipline procedures, labeling or hazard communication program

Performance weaknesses - General failure to effectively implement the safety policies, programs, plans, processes, procedures, practices, including training This usually results repeated hazardous conditions and unsafe or

inappropriate performance

If you're pointing at a written plan, policy, procedure, or failures in program implementation, then it's probably a root cause

Page 23: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

23

Step 5 – Recommend corrective actions and improvements

Recommendations should be specific, constructive, and address the contributing factors and root causes

Recommendations should not include disciplinary action. Focus on redirecting the erroneous behavior – keep it positive!

The hierarchy of controls:

Engineering controls. Eliminate/reduce hazards through equipment redesign, replacement, substitution, removal, etc.

Administrative controls. Eliminate/reduce frequency and duration of exposure to hazards by controlling employee behaviors. Four primary strategies: Develop safe procedures and practices Scheduling Use of personal protective equipment (PPE) Conduct a job hazard analysis

Page 24: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

24

Step 5 – Recommend corrective actions and improvements

System improvements might include some of the following:

Revising a safety and health plan (IIPP in California) that includes all safety management elements

Improving a safety policy (SOP) so that it clearly establishes responsibility and accountability

Changing a training plan to include demonstration Develop a Job Hazard Analyses (JHA) for key positions Revising purchasing policy to include safety considerations as well as

cost Changing the safety inspection process to include all supervisors and

employees

Page 25: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

25

Step 6 – Write the report

The teamwork approach lessens the burden and shortens report writing time. Do not gloss over the accident or near miss, a thorough review process may

uncover overlooked hazards and may prevent similar occurrences. Keep an open-mind and be objective When interviewing the employee or witnesses:

Meet in a private room if possible with no distractions Interview witnesses separately Put the person at ease Emphasize the reason for the interview, that is, to determine what happened and why;

not to place blame or punish Let them talk Do not lead, interrupt, prompt, ask leading questions, show your emotions, or jump to

conclusions Do not ask yes/no questions; keep them open-ended Have someone on the team take the extensive notes while others take shorter notes Confirm that you have the facts correct Close on a positive note.

Prepare the Report in an area with few distractions Make sure to follow-up on all recommendations and corrective actions Share best practices with staff.

Page 26: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

Example #1

Slips and falls were occurring outside the company cafeteria due to coffee spills.

Employees were requested in email notifications and sign placed at the exit of the cafeteria to place a lid on all coffee cups.

Slips and falls continued to occur from same apparent cause. Lids were still not placed on coffee cups.

Paper towel dispenser placed outside cafeteria door to wipe up spills.

Slips and falls continued to occur from same apparent cause. Lids were not placed on coffee cups and spills were not being wiped up with towels.

Root cause analysis by interviews determined to be hurried employees.

Corrective action - Lids place at register and handed to employee by cashier to cover coffee cups.

No recurrence of slips and falls from spilled coffee.

Page 27: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

Example #2

Rash of accidents occur at a railroad crossing in Burbank.

Public Utilities Commission report states that the frequency is coincidental.

Critics claim root cause not determined. Intersection configuration is confusing.

Issue remains unresolved.

Page 28: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

Los Angeles Times

April 8, 2003

Page 29: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

Example #2 (Continued)

Page 30: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

30

Why do accident investigations sometimes fail?

They address only the surface (contributing) causes only; Root causes are often ignored or undetected

The report process or document is too cumbersome or detailed. The report should basically be a “cleaned up” version of all of your hard work and efforts from Step 1 through Step 5

Report is “closed out” and never viewed again. The report should be a “live” document until all actions are complete

When the accident investigator completes the report, they often fail to give it to someone who must do something with it

What else?

Page 31: Effective Accident Investigation August 12, 2015 Jim Bright Risk Engineering Zurich Services Corp

© Z

uri

ch In

sura

nce

Com

pan

y L

td

31

© 2006 Zurich Services Corporation. All rights reserved. The information in this publication and presentation was compiled by Zurich Services Corporation from sources believed to be reliable. Further, all sample policies and procedures herein should serve as a guideline which you can use to create your own policies and procedures. We trust that you will customize these samples to reflect your own operations and believe that these samples may serve as a helpful platform for this endeavor. Any and all information contained herein is not intended to constitute legal advice and accordingly, you should consult with your own attorneys when developing programs and policies. We do not guarantee the accuracy of this information or any results and further assume no liability in connection with this publication and presentation and sample policies and procedures, including any information, methods or safety suggestions contained herein. Moreover, Zurich Services Corporation reminds you that this cannot be assumed to contain every acceptable safety and compliance procedure or that additional procedures might not be appropriate under the circumstances. The subject matter of this publication and presentation is not tied to any specific insurance product nor will adopting these policies and procedures ensure coverage under any insurance policy.

Thank You

Jim Bright805.499.2342 Office818.389.3951 [email protected]