EENY10 Backhaul Debate

8/4/2019 EENY10 Backhaul Debate

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eeny10-backhaul-debate 1/35

Carrier Ethernet Solutions

ew or , ovem er ,

Senior Analyst



Heavy Reading Forecasto

Private and confidential – contents may not be re-used without approval from Heavy Reading



Heavy Reading Forecast-




Mobile Data Consumption n e .

Source: FCC, October 2010




“ ,expect will be the primary transport protocol used?”

“ ” “ ”

VLAN/Provider Bridge 32% 6%

PBB-TE 1% 3%

IP/MPLS 28% 64%

MPLS-TP 10% 7%

VPLS 8% 6%

Don’t know 20% 15%

TOTAL 100% 100%

Source: Heavy Reading’ s Annual Mobile Backhaul Survey, December 2009: N=68



“Which of the following statements best captures your view

requirements and how likely their assumptions are to change over the next two years?

ALL

OPERATORS

LTE backhaul requirements are already well understood. What people arethinking now is likely much the same as what they will be thinking two years 23%

rom now.

LTE backhaul requirements are already well understood. Even so, whatpeople are thinking now may change significantly over the next two years.

31%

LTE backhaul re uirements are enerall not well understood et. And what people are thinking now may change significantly over the next two years.

LTE backhaul requirements are generally not well understood yet. Even so,what people are thinking now is likely much the same as what they will be 0%

.

Don’t know / Not sure 3%

TOTAL 100%

Source: Heavy Reading ’s Annual Mobile Backhaul Survey, December 2009: N=68



U comin Hot-Button Issues• The X2 interface

• Backhaul security•

• Bandwidth requirements• Synchronization

•

Private and confidential – contents may not be re-used



• Joe Manuele, SVP, Worldwide Sales &

us omer uppor , c e s e wor s• Greg.S. Gumm, Chief Marketing &eve opmen cer, e wor s

• Zeev Draer, VP Marketing, MRVommun ca ons

• David Boland, Senior Manager, Mobility

o u ons un per e wor s



Joe Manuele

SVP Worldwide Sales & Customer Support, Actelis Networks



Accelerating Demand

Mobility Applications

Devices

Anywhere



Changing Infrastructure Needs

Sure…exploding demand in bandwidth

–

“Throwing” bandwidth at everything is not the answerProliferation of smaller cell sites: hyper-local solutions for theyper oca era

Femtocell categories up to 31.8 million units by 2014i

Metropolitan picocell (carrier installed) CAGR 378% (2014)i

Micro cell growing, not at same pace as femto or pico cell

Refining cell site requirements

-, ,

Require low Latency and Jitter backhaul to support apps

Price points – few hundred dollars

Proprietary & Confidential Property of Actelis Networks.

Copyright ©2010‐11 Actelis Networks®, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED3

i. Based on data from InStat Research



Evolving Architecture

Demand is not the future, it is here

internet enabled by end of 2010ii

Revenue growth not keeping pace withbandwidth demand $50,000

$60,000

$70,000

Stay on TDM

Requires affordable backhaul

Fiber is an option

Microwave where possible $20,000

$30,000

$40,000

…or move to

Ethernet

But what is practical?

Fiber is not ubiquitous and unaffordablefor micro cell sites

$0

$10,000

CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11 CY12 CY13 CY14

PDM and ATM over PDH Ethernet fiber and copper

Microwave impractical and unaffordablefor micro cell sites

Legacy copper is inadequate

Annual Backhaul Service Charges perConnection iii



ii. Based on International Telecommunications Union data

iii. Infonetics Research – Mobile Backhaul Equipment and Services Market Size, Share, and Forecasts, April 2010



Accelerating, Changing, Evolving:The Quest for Optimal Results

Asian Carrier Navigating Ethernet over Copper the Optimal 40K micro cell sites, less than

10Mbps bandwidthSufficient bandwidth (support for up to

100Mbps/link) everywhere

Backhaul major contributors to cost,

Fiber not available or affordable,

microwave several X cost of micro

Cost: Less than 10% of fiber, less than 30% of

microwave. Faster deployment using existing

copper, leading a quiet revolution.

Reliability and QoS are critical Unsurpassed reliability , superior cross talk

management & QoS support (jitter, latency)

Synchronization support Resilient precision clocking

Flexible Architecture Aggregation systems, hardened EADs, SFP





Deployment Topology

Switch

Core

Network

• Up to 100Mbps over copper• Reliable, Robust• Clock s nchronization

Micro cell site

Aggregation Unit

EAD

Aggregation Point

10 100 1000BaseT

100/1000BaseFX• Superior cross talk management

EAD

Actelis’ technology with over 20 patents in the science of copper

Acceleratin network de lo ments b focusin on The 3 R’s of EFM:

Micro cell site

Accelerating Rate: Up to 20x increase in per pair bandwidth

Extending Reach: Covering virtually every location, regardless of distance

Accelerated Reliability: Fiber-like qualityMulti-dimensional Resilience – System, Facility, Service, Spectral, Copper pairs

Superior Performance – enabling SLAs and QoS





Reaching New Heights with Copper Based Technology

Actelis’ patented technologyOptimizing transmission: 2x rate/reach vs. other EFM solutions

Expand services: Greater reliability, robust service offerings

Extend deployments: Greater distances without repeaters

Enhance throughput : with fewer pairs & superior cross talk management

entra

Office

Metro

Ethernet

Network

Customer Service Area

(CSA) limit


Copyright ©2010‐11 Actelis Networks®, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



Spread the Wordpread the Word

Thank youhank you



Carrier Ethernet Solutions for

ew or , ovem er r ,

Chief Marketing & Development Officer, ANDA Networks



AGENDA Overvie

• Headquartered in Sunnyvale, CA, we manufacture Carrier EthernetAccess devices for business Ethernet and wireless backhaul

applications

• Shi ed 27 000+ MEF certified award winnin latforms worldwide

• Customers include:

• Will highlight examples of wireless backhaul applications:

• o m gra on w an - a a o oa• 3G/WiMAX/4G LTE converged backhaul

• Key takeaways



Operator 1 – Wireless Backhaul for Cellular 2G/3G and WiMAX Data Off-load

Metro/ Core RouterNorth American

Project XXXXX -Cellular RAN-Data Offload- Initial Total sites = 22 BSC serving areas/metro- 3 sites shown as example- All sites carry the same VLANs, Multipoint VLAN bridging- Approx 200 MAC’s per cell site

-

r e ess pera o rProvisioning &

Policy Servers

-- GigE, EoPDH, EoSONET via Ethernet edge aggregator

- E-Line Converged Business Services for Hotspot/Femtocell backhaul- QOS priority and OA&M monitoring for VoIP

GigETrunks SONET toEthernet Edge

North American

GigE’s

nxDS1/3

Cell site BTEFor Data offload via

3x/ 6x Channelized DS3

Aggregator

nxDS1/3

Ethernet toSONET Edge

aggregator

with EoPDHaggregation

North Americanelecom

(Internet Access Service)

nxDS1/3(IMUX)

OA&M/ QOS to monitor

and priorit ize VoIP

(IMUX)

T1’s forvoice

Cell site BTEFor Data offload via

bonded circuits

Metro CO & MSC

10/100BT 10/100BT

EthernetSwitch

EthernetSwitch

802.11nFemtocellData offloadwith VoIP for

10/100BT

EthernetSwitch

T1 forvoice

Cell site BTEFor Data

offload viabonded

circuits with

WiMAX BTS BTS WiMAX BTS WiMAX BTS

SMB/SMEBusinesses

BTS BTS

prioritize

VoIP



Operator 2 – 3G CDMA to 4G LTE/WiMAX Converged Backhaul

•

• Hybrid radio BTS enables easy migration to 4G LTE without major cell site forklift upgrades

• ANDA Basestation Terminating Equipment (BTE) combines CDMA, WIMAX, and LTE traffic at the cell sitebase stations from the hybrid RAN for converged backhaul

• Converged backhaul requires both TDM and packet support with 4G LTE data only (Phase 1), fallback to2G/3G for circuit switched voice using real time performance monitoring to recognize service type

• Redundant multi-layer core edge devices aggregate 3G/4G traffic to and from the WAN



Ethernet Expo

“CARRIER ETHERNET SOLUTIONS

BACKHAUL”

David Boland

Nov 03 2010



MOBILE BACKHAUL &HIGH-PERFORMANCE ETHERNET

Scalable

Fast

ReliableEthernet Backhaul Must be:

Secure

Sim le

2 Copyright © 2009 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net



ETHERNET LAYER 3 BACKHAUL CASE STUDY

Large Mobile Carrier

Currently ~6M Mobile Subscribers

Ethernet Switch at Every Tower Cell sites are collected via IP/Ethernet in groups of 4-10

Aggregate at one or more CE routers

These connect to nearest IPVPN PE

OSPF w/ BFD used to rovide IP routing BGP used in CE/PE

Q in Q & 802.1P

e un ancy s a an a e Single points of link failures should not offline more than one cell site

A single spoke site may be lost due to a single link failure




HIGH LEVEL ARCHITECTURE

Mobility MSOLocation

Dual GE(Wavelength or

Dark Fibre)

CO

DualPEs

Dual

CE Routers

MobilityNetwork

CO

Sites with Microwave behind(Ring or Linear)

IP/MPLS

100M / GEEthernet

CE PEMetroEthernet

CO

PE

CE

Microwave

Sites connected viaMicrowave hops

Sites Directly Connected toMPLS




Cell Sites directly connected to IP VPN

Node B

Node B

To manage cost / accommodate geography various topologies areused to bring cell sites back to the IPVPN

Redundanc is a desi n mandate

Microwave

•Single points of link failures should not offline more than one

cell siteA mix of topologies are in use

•Rin

MPLS

Network

Ethernet /Fast EthernetConnections

•Star•Hybrid Ring/Star

PE Router

CE Router

IPVPNService

Cell Site

100 Mbps EthernetConnection

Ethernet Switch

Ethernet overMicrowave

WAN link to nextCell Site

10 Mhz or 30Mhz


TLAN / Alarming

Network(existing)

Approximately 1800 cell sites directly connected to IPVPN

Cell Site TechnicianAccess



MOBILE BACKHAUL &HIGH-PERFORMANCE ETHERNET

1,000s of cell sites, millions of subscribersScalable

Small packet performance, fastconvergence, high-speed uplinksFast

Beyond Spanning tree, BFD, dual linksReliable

Secure the network, FirewallsSecure

Ethernet simplicity, Layer 3 smartSimple






Debate: Carrier Ethernet Solutions for

Optical Communication Systems Zeev Draer ar e ng , ommun ca ons nc.

[email protected]



Mobile Backhaul Challenges

• Migration from TDM to packet network

- Fiber, microwave, FSO & Bonded Copper

• Circuit Emulation Services

• Timing Synchronization • Extensions of MPLS or native Ethernet

• Ring-based or LAG sub 50ms protection• Per Service end-to-end OAM

• Traffic mapping to Ethernet Virtual Circuits

• Traffic Mana ement – Hierarchical oS

• Bandwidth scalability• Security and line integrity

2



Packet Switched or Transport Backhaul?

Optical Transport RAN

Implementation factors:

• Technological familiarity

• Operational analysis

Optical Packet Switched RAN• Service & technology maturity• “More…

3



Operator Example: UMTS and GSM Services over PSN

–

• Hierarchical QoS

• SLA measurements and throughput testing

Cell site

Synchronous

Ethernet Network

4



Operator Example: Wholesale Mobile Backhaul Service

Mobile Service Provider

o esa e prov er

o esa e erv ce:

• E-Line L2 transport service

• Reliability - G.8032 and 1:1

• Scalable cell site bandwidth >300Mbps

• ca a e aggrega on ranspor -

• End-to-end SLA monitoring – Y.1731

• Throughput testing

5



Operator Example: 4G/LTE Mobile Backhaul

Managed quality of service in 4G/LTE multipoint network

Serves as demarcation device for real-time SLA performance monitoring

Simplified SLA test during the service setup and in-service monitoring on productive LTE links

Multipoint connectivity between eNodeB

S-GW / MME

− End-to-end service OAM (loopback and measurements - Y.1731)

eNodeB

and towards GW Evolved PacketCore Network

6

− RFC2544 throughput measurement for service turn-up



MRV Fast Facts

Founded in

Corporate Headquarters

Chatsworth, CA, USA

50 service offices in 23 countries

Y2009 sales

Employees worldwide

ISO Certified

MRV provides optical communication systems to more than 100 wireline, wireless and cable MSO carriers and thousands of Enterprises

7



Oops! Some of the presentations aremissing!

Post event you will automatically receive

all updated available presentations. Anyresentations not included will have been

withheld at the speakers’ request – bettertake good notes!

Documents

EENY10 Backhaul Debate