3
Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo Rodent PD Model, Clinical Biobanks, and Underutilization of PD Robert H. J. Beelen, 1 Donald J. Fraser, 2 Peter Rutherford, 3 and Janusz Witowski 4 1 Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands 2 Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK 3 Baxter World Trade, Lessines, Belgium, presently Quintiles, Reading, UK 4 Department of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland Correspondence should be addressed to Robert H. J. Beelen; [email protected] Received 26 November 2015; Accepted 26 November 2015 Copyright © 2016 Robert H. J. Beelen et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is necessary for the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) both prior to kidney transplantation or in patients where kidney transplan- tation is not available. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodial- ysis (HD) are lifesaving RRTs for more than 2 million patients with ESRD worldwide [1]. As the incidence of chronic renal disease has doubled over the past decade, the number of patients with ESRD is expected to increase by 5–8% annually [2]. Although long-term morbidity and mortality are comparable between PD and HD, there is an early patient survival advantage for PD and a better quality of life [3]. Moreover PD is cost-effective as compared to hospital-based HD [4]. Nevertheless only one out of 10 patients is treated with PD, which suggests a general underutilization [5]. PD is a simple therapy in which PD fluid is exchanged several times a day; the major limitations are peritoneal membrane damage on the long-term and infection [6]. PD could be largely enhanced if one can identify diagnostic and therapeutic tools to improve PD outcome that promote function of the peritoneal membrane and prevent infectious complications [7]. European Training and Research in Peritoneal Dialysis (EuTRiPD) is an EU funded training programme, in which exactly these goals are targeted [8]. In this special issue of BMRI, we present a number of articles prepared in part (but also by other contributors) with a support from the EuTRiPD initiative. ese are both original research papers and review papers that (i) analyze basic aspects of peritoneal cell biology using in vitro methods, (ii) mimic clinical situations in relevant PD models in rodents, and (iii) describe the outcomes of clinical studies using new biomarkers or new interventions. In the following papers, firstly studies apply in vitro models to investigate the senescence-associated proteome in mesothelial cells, the effect of differently sterilized PD fluids on mesothelial stress responses, and the contribution of mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition to peritoneal fibrob- last expansion. Secondly with respect to papers in rodent PD models a new mouse uremic model is presented, the effect of rapamycin in a mouse model is shown, and moreover clear indications are described in protective effect of paricalcitol in a PD model and another PD-fibrosis-like model. irdly clinical material was used in studies showing the importance of, respectively, HA, microRNA, osmolarity of fluid, and tenascin-C levels reflecting peritoneal patient status. Finally underutilization of PD is discussed as originating from less education and referral pattern and moreover it is discussed that new biomarkers in PD could contribute significantly to making choices for the future as shown by EuTRiPD. e editors feel that all these papers give a good overview of the state of art in addressing all aspects of PD. Robert H. J. Beelen Donald J. Fraser Peter Rutherford Janusz Witowski Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2016, Article ID 4964316, 2 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4964316

Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/4964316.pdf · Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/4964316.pdf · Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo

EditorialAddressing Peritoneal Dialysis:In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo Rodent PD Model,Clinical Biobanks, and Underutilization of PD

Robert H. J. Beelen,1 Donald J. Fraser,2 Peter Rutherford,3 and Janusz Witowski4

1Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands2Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK3Baxter World Trade, Lessines, Belgium, presently Quintiles, Reading, UK4Department of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Robert H. J. Beelen; [email protected]

Received 26 November 2015; Accepted 26 November 2015

Copyright © 2016 Robert H. J. Beelen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is necessary for the survivalof patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) both prior tokidney transplantation or in patients where kidney transplan-tation is not available. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodial-ysis (HD) are lifesaving RRTs formore than 2million patientswith ESRD worldwide [1]. As the incidence of chronicrenal disease has doubled over the past decade, the numberof patients with ESRD is expected to increase by 5–8%annually [2]. Although long-term morbidity and mortalityare comparable between PD and HD, there is an early patientsurvival advantage for PD and a better quality of life [3].Moreover PD is cost-effective as compared to hospital-basedHD [4]. Nevertheless only one out of 10 patients is treatedwith PD, which suggests a general underutilization [5]. PD isa simple therapy in which PD fluid is exchanged several timesa day; themajor limitations are peritonealmembrane damageon the long-term and infection [6]. PD could be largelyenhanced if one can identify diagnostic and therapeutictools to improve PD outcome that promote function of theperitoneal membrane and prevent infectious complications[7]. European Training and Research in Peritoneal Dialysis(EuTRiPD) is an EU funded training programme, in whichexactly these goals are targeted [8].

In this special issue of BMRI, we present a number ofarticles prepared in part (but also by other contributors)with a support from the EuTRiPD initiative. These are bothoriginal research papers and review papers that (i) analyze

basic aspects of peritoneal cell biology using in vitromethods,(ii) mimic clinical situations in relevant PD models inrodents, and (iii) describe the outcomes of clinical studiesusing new biomarkers or new interventions.

In the following papers, firstly studies apply in vitromodels to investigate the senescence-associated proteomein mesothelial cells, the effect of differently sterilized PDfluids onmesothelial stress responses, and the contribution ofmesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition to peritoneal fibrob-last expansion. Secondly with respect to papers in rodent PDmodels a new mouse uremic model is presented, the effect ofrapamycin in a mouse model is shown, and moreover clearindications are described in protective effect of paricalcitolin a PD model and another PD-fibrosis-like model. Thirdlyclinical material was used in studies showing the importanceof, respectively, HA, microRNA, osmolarity of fluid, andtenascin-C levels reflecting peritoneal patient status. Finallyunderutilization of PD is discussed as originating from lesseducation and referral pattern and moreover it is discussedthat new biomarkers in PD could contribute significantly tomaking choices for the future as shown by EuTRiPD. Theeditors feel that all these papers give a good overview of thestate of art in addressing all aspects of PD.

Robert H. J. BeelenDonald J. FraserPeter RutherfordJanusz Witowski

Hindawi Publishing CorporationBioMed Research InternationalVolume 2016, Article ID 4964316, 2 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4964316

Page 2: Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/4964316.pdf · Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo

2 BioMed Research International

References

[1] A. K. Jain, P. Blake, P. Cordy, and A. X. Garg, “Global trends inrates of peritoneal dialysis,” Journal of the American Society ofNephrology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 533–544, 2012.

[2] M. W. M. van de Luijtgaarden, K. J. Jager, M. Segelmark et al.,“Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survivalin the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period,” NephrologyDialysis Transplantation, Article ID gfv295, pp. 1–9, 2015.

[3] K. Chaudhary, H. Sangha, and R. Khanna, “Peritoneal dialysisfirst: rationale,” Clinical Journal of the American Society ofNephrology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 447–456, 2011.

[4] G. Abraham, S. Varughese, M. Mathew, and M. Vijayan, “Areview of acute and chronic peritoneal dialysis in developingcountries,” Clinical Kidney Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 310–317,2015.

[5] J. Hingwala, J. Diamond, N. Tangri et al., “Underutilizationof peritoneal dialysis: the role of the nephrologist’s referralpattern,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp.732–740, 2013.

[6] R. Sinnakirouchenan and J. L. Holley, “Peritoneal dialysis versushemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues,” Advances inChronic Kidney Disease, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 428–432, 2011.

[7] M. N. Schilte, J. W. A. M. Celie, P. M. Ter Wee, R. H. J.Beelen, and J. van den Born, “Factors contributing to peritonealtissue remodeling in peritoneal dialysis,” Peritoneal DialysisInternational, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 605–617, 2009.

[8] T. L. Foster, E. Ferrantelli, T. V. W.-V. der Schaaf, and R. H. J.Beelen, “European training and research in peritoneal dialysis:scientific objectives, training, implementation and impact of theprogramme,” Journal of Renal Care, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34–39,2014.

Page 3: Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/4964316.pdf · Editorial Addressing Peritoneal Dialysis: In Vitro PD Models, In Vivo

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com