EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, …worldofhistory.weebly.com/uploads/6/0/0/1/6001052/first_world_war... · EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, Section

EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, Section A: First World War 1905-1918

Use this revision checklist to help you keep track of all the topics you need to revise for your exam. You need to have a confident grasp of the subject knowledge

about each event. Try revising facts and key features about each event and recalling the key points and details on paper. When you feel confident enough,

progress onto the next event. For exam practice, Questions A + B of the paper do not require prior knowledge but Question C does. Although I have not

included any sources, for the exam questions below, make a small table/list outlining the evidence for and against each statement with supporting facts.

Key Question 1

Topics You should be able to: Checklist Exam Questions Checklist

How did International

Rivalry contribute to the outbreak

of war?

Triple Alliance

Describe how, when and why the Dual Alliance formed.

Describe how, when and why the Triple Alliance formed.

‘The formation of the Alliance System was the primary cause of the First World War’. Do you

agree?

Triple Entente Describe how, when and why the Franco-Russian

Alliance, Entente Cordiale, Anglo-Russian Entente and Triple Entente formed.

Economic Causes of

International Rivalry

Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the British, French, Russian, German, Italian and Austro-Hungarian economies.

Describe why economic competition could lead to conflict.

‘Economic competition was the main cause of

the First World War’. Do you agree?

Imperial Causes of


Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the British, French, Russian, German, Italian and Austro-Hungarian empires.

Describe why the race for empires could lead to conflict.

‘The race for empires amongst European nations was the main cause of the First World

War.’ Do you agree?

Military Causes of


Describe what militarism is.

Describe why Germany could be considered a militaristic state.

Describe why there was a rise in military spending.

‘The militaristic nature of European governments was the primary reason for the outbreak of the

First World War.’ Do you agree?

Key Question 2


How did conflict in the

Balkans contribute to the outbreak

of war?

Balkan Rivalries

Describe the aims and objectives of the Ottoman Empire, Austria-Hungary, Serbia and Russia in the Balkans.

‘The main cause of the First World War was the tensions and conflicts in the

Balkans.’ Do you agree?

The Bosnian Crisis 1908

Describe the causes, events and effects of the Bosnian Crisis.

Describe how the Bosnian Crisis contributed to increasing tensions in the Balkans.

The Balkan Wars

1912-1913

Describe the causes, events and effects of the Balkan Wars.

Describe how the Balkan Wars contributed to increasing tensions in the Balkans.

The Assassination

of Franz Ferdinand

1914

Describe how, why and by whom Franz Ferdinand was assassinated.

Describe the series of events that led from the assassination to the outbreak of the First World War.

‘The main cause of the First World War

was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand.’ Do you agree?

Key Question 3


How did the growth of tension in

Europe increase the likelihood of

war?

Anglo-German

Naval Race

Describe the causes, events and results of the Anglo-German Naval Race.

‘The main cause of the First World War was the Anglo-German Naval Race.’ Do you agree?

The First Moroccan

Crisis 1905-1906

Describe the causes, events and results of the Tangier Crisis.

Describe what happened at the Algeciras Conference. ‘The main cause of the First World War was the crises over Morocco.’

Do you agree?

The Second Moroccan

Crisis 1911

Describe the causes, events and results of the Agadir Crisis.

Key Question 4


What was the fighting like on the Western Front?

The Failure of the

Schlieffen Pan

Aug-Dec 1914

Describe how the Schlieffen Plan was intended to work.

Describe how and why the Schlieffen Plan failed.

Describe why the failure of the Schlieffen Plan led to trench warfare.

‘The main reason for the failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the action of the

French army at the Battle of the Marne.’ Do you agree?

The Trench System

Describe the key features of the trench system.

Describe how trench warfare worked.

‘The main reason for the construction of the trench system was to gain

territory.’ Do you agree?

Life in the Trenches

Describe what conditions in the trenches were like for soldiers in reference to: daily life, food, hygiene, healthcare, comradeship, weather and dangers.

‘Life in the trenches was unpleasant

rather than dangerous.’ Do you agree?

New Weapons

and Technology

Describe the advantages and disadvantages of chlorine, phosgene and mustard gas.

Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tanks.

Describe the advantages and disadvantages of aircraft.

‘Technological developments did little to break the stalemate on the Western

Front.’ Do you agree?

Reasons for Stalemate

Describe how the trench system, machine gun, failure of new weapons and the failure of commanders all contributed to the stalemate on the Western Front.

‘The main reason for deadlock on the Western Front was due to the poor

tactics of the Generals.’ Do you agree?

The Battle of the Somme

1916

Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of the Somme.

Describe the main reasons why the battle was a disaster.

‘The main reason for the disaster on the first day of the Somme was due to German preparations.’ Do you agree?

The Third Battle of

Ypres 1917

Describe the cause, events and results of the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele).

Describe the main reasons why the battle was a failure.

‘The main reason for the failure of the Third Battle of Ypres was due to poor weather conditions.’ Do you agree?

The Role of Douglas

Haig

Describe the evidence against Haig’s leadership.

Describe the evidence in defence of Haig’s leadership.

‘The main reason for the British disasters on the Somme and Passchendaele was the poor

leadership of Douglas Haig.’ Do you agree?

Key Question 5


What was the fighting like in other theatres of

war?

The Gallipoli

Campaign 1916

Describe causes, events and results of the Gallipoli campaign.

Describe the main reasons why the campaign was a failure.

Describe how the successful evacuation was carried out.

‘The main reason for the failure of the Gallipoli Campaign was poor planning.’ Do you agree?

‘The main reason for the failure of the Gallipoli

Campaign was due to the poor living conditions in the trenches.’ Do you agree?

Key Events of the War

at Sea 1914-1915

Describe the key features of the British Naval Blockade.

Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of Heligoland Bight.

Describe why the German Navy raided towns along the east coast of Britain.

Describe the causes, events and results of the Battle of Dogger Banks.

‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918

was the British Naval Blockade.’ Do you agree?

The Battle of Jutland 1916

Describe the cause, events and effects of the Battle of Jutland.

Describe the two interpretations on who won the battle.

‘The Battle of Jutland was a complete victory for the

British Navy.’ Do you agree?

The German U-boat

Campaign

Describe the causes, events and effects of the German U-boat campaign.

Describe how Britain managed to defeat the U-boat threat.

‘The failure of the German U-boat campaign is the

main reason why Germany eventually lost the war in 1918.’ Do you agree?

Key Question 6


How was Germany

finally defeated?

US Entry into the War

1917

Describe the reasons why the USA entered the war.

Describe the causes and effects of the Sinking of the Lusitania.

Describe the American contribution to the Allied war effort.

‘The sinking of the Lusitania was the main reason why the USA joined the

War on the Allied side.’ Do you agree?

‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the entry of the

USA into the war.’ Do you agree?

The German Spring

Offensives 1918

Describe the causes, events and effects of the Spring Offensives.

Why did the Spring Offensives fail?

Describe how the Allies counter-attacked after the offensives.

‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the failure of the

Spring Offensives.’ Do you agree?

The Defeat of German

1918

Describe how: the British Naval Blockade; entry of the USA; Russian Revolution, Tanks, Revolution in Germany and the defeat of Germany’s Allies all contributed to Germany’s final defeat.

‘The main reason for the defeat of

Germany in 1918 was the use of tanks.’ Do you agree?

1. How did the creation of Germany in 1871 upset the balance of power

in Europe?

2. How and why did the Triple Alliance form?

5. How did military rivalry increase

international tensions in Europe?

3. How and why did the Triple Entente form?

4. How did economic and imperial rivalry contribute to international tension?

What were the long-term

causes of international

rivalry?

1. Why was the Ottoman Empire so weak by 1900? 2. What were the aims of Russia and Austria-Hungary in the Balkans?

5. What were the Balkan Wars (1912-13) and

how did they increase tensions in Europe?

3. How did rising Balkan nationalism increase the

risk of war?

4. What was the Bosnian Crisis (1908) and how did it increase tensions in Europe?

How did the struggle over

the Balkans worsen

tensions in Europe?

1. How and why did Germany challenge Britain’s naval supremacy? 2. How did the launch of HMS DREADNOUGHT lead to a naval arms race?

3. How and why did the First Moroccan Crisis

(1905-6) increase tensions?

4. How and why did the Second Moroccan Crisis

(1911) increase tensions?

5. How and why was Franz Ferdinand assassinated?

6. How did events spiral out of control after the assassination?

How else did tension

grow in Europe

before 1914?

1. What was the Schlieffen Plan? 2. What fatal assumptions did the plan make?

7. How and where did the French army finally

stop the German advance?

4. How did Belgian resistance slow the plan

down?

6. How did the BEF contribute to the defeat of the plan?

3. Was the plan undermined by changes?

5. How did German exhaustion contribute to the

failure?

Why did the

Schlieffen Plan fail?

1. Why had the war descended into trench

warfare by Christmas 1914?

2. What were the key features of the trench

system?

8. What were the reasons for deadlock on the

Western Front?

3. What was life like for soldiers in the trenches?

5. How were tanks used on the Western Front?

4. How was gas used on the Western Front?

6. How were aircraft used on the Western Front?

7. What other new weapons and tactics were used

on the Western Front?

What was the

fighting like in the

trenches?

1. When and why was the Somme offensive

launched?

2. What happened during the battle and what did it achieve?

6. Was Douglas Haig to blame for the failure

to achieve a breakthrough?

3. How did bad planning and leadership contribute to

the disaster?

4. What role did failing technology play in the defeat?

5. Were there factors outside of British control that

contributed to the failure of the offensive?

Why was there no

breakthrough at

the Somme?

1. When and why was the Third Battle of Ypres

(Passchendaele) launched?

2. What happened during the battle and what did it achieve?

6. Was Douglas Haig to blame for the failure

to achieve a breakthrough?


the disaster?



contributed to the failure of the offensive?

Why was there no

breakthrough at

Passchendaele?

1. When and why did the Allies launch the Gallipoli

campaign?

2. What happened during the campaign and what were conditions like for soldiers?

7. What were the results of the campaign?


the disaster?



contributed to the failure of the campaign?

6. Were the evacuations a success?

Why did the

Gallipoli campaign

fail?

1. How did the German navy threaten Britain? 2. What happened at the Battle of Heligoland

Bight?

7. What were the effects of the British

blockade on Germany?

3. What happened during the German raids on

the British east coast?

5. What was the Battle of Jutland and who won?

Who won the war

at sea?

4. What happened at the Battle of Dogger Bank?

6. How did U-boats threaten Britain and how were they defeated?

1. Why did the USA decide to remain neutral at the start of WW1? 2. How did the sinking of RMS Lusitania effect relations between the USA and

Germany?

5. How significant was the US contribution to

the Allies during the war?

3. What was the Zimmerman Telegram and how

did it effect relations between the USA and

Germany?

4. How did the collapse of Tsar Nicholas II’s Russia influence the US decision to enter the war?

Why and with what effect

did the USA enter the war

in 1917?

1. Why did Ludendorff decide to launch an offensive on the Western Front in

Spring 1918?

2. What successes did the offensive have at first?

5. When and why did Germany’s allies

(Austria-Hungary, Turkey, Bulgaria)

surrender?

3. Why did the Spring Offensive fail by July 1918?

4. How did the Allies respond to the Spring Offensive in August 1918?

What was the German

Spring Offensive and why

did it fail?

fdfd

1. Failure of the German U-boat campaign? 2. Impact of the British blockade?

8. Impact of Bolshevik Revolution and Kiel

Mutiny?

3. Contribution of the USA?

5. Role of Tanks?

4. Failure of the Spring Offensive?

6. Role of Foch?

7. Defeat of Germany’s Allies?

How and why did

Germany finally

collapse in 1918?

A2: The Origins & Course of the First World War: Key

Events

1.) The Major World Powers in 1914

Country Britain Germany Russia Austria-Hungary France

Ruler King George V

1910-1936

Kaiser Wilhelm

II 1888-1918

Tsar Nicholas

II

1894-1917

Emperor Franz

Joseph II

1848-1916

President

Raymond

Poincarè

1913-1920

Population 40.8 million 65 million 159 million 50 million 39.6 million

Numb of

colonies 56 10 n/a n/a 29

Size of

colonies 27 million sq. km

2.5 million sq.

km n/a n/a

11 million sq.

km

Population of

colonies 390 million 15 million n/a n/a 58 million

Size of army 700,000 soldiers 4,200,000

soldiers

1,200,000

soldiers 800,000 soldiers

3,700,000

soldiers

Size of navy 388 ships 281 ships 166 ships 67 ships 207 ships

Coal output

each year

292 million

tonnes

277 million

tonnes

36.2 million

tonnes 47 million tonnes

40 million

tonnes

Steel output

each year 11 million tonnes

14 million

tonnes

3.6 million

tonnes 5 million tonnes

4.6 million

tonnes

Knowing and understanding the key events and facts from each topic is obviously essential. For

Paper 2, Section A topics like WW1 1905-1918, you need to be able to expand on the sources with

your own factual knowledge. Make sure you study the following list of key events and changes as

part of your revision:

2.) Formation of the Triple Alliance - 1882

What? When? Who? Why?

Dual Alliance –

defensive alliance which

pledged the signatories

to aid one another in

case of an attack by

Russia. Each state also

promised benevolent

neutrality to the other

if attacked by another

European power.

7th

October

1879

Germany

and

Austria-

Hungary

A defensive alliance was sought between these two powers

due to their common dislike and fear of Russia. In 1878

Russia had defeated the Ottoman Empire in the Russo-

Turkish War, gaining considerable influence over the

Balkans. This angered Austria-Hungary who was Russia’s

chief competitor in the region. Germany Chancellor Bismark

called an international conference (Congress of Berlin) to

solve the tensions. The Treaty of Berlin that year

provided Austria with Bosnia as compensation but relations

between Germany and Russia had also soured, with Russia

resenting German and Austrian meddling in the Balkans.

Triple Alliance –

defensive alliance in

which members

promised to support

each other in the event

of an attack by any

other great power or

for Germany and Italy,

an attack by France

alone.

1882

Germany,

Austria-

Hungary

and Italy

The Dual Alliance was extended in 1882 when Italy joined.

Italy had been angered by the French seizure of Tunisia in

1881 as many Italians considered Tunisia as a potential

colony. Italy felt compelled to join the Alliance despite the

fact that Austria-Hungary had been Italy’s traditional

enemy and had fought 3 wars in the past 34 years!

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=hyax_dw4JX7OnM&tbnid=vH_pkpSSVoqW9M:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_Alliance_(1882)&ei=1djYUt3TNeTkiAe1_YBo&psig=AFQjCNFD5Pckj_qaiH3npcS6jQKynhgaLw&ust=1390029261120409

3.) Formation of the Triple Entente

What? When? Who? Why?

Franco-Russian Alliance

– a military alliance that

stipulated that if one of

the countries of the

Triple Alliance attacked

France or Russia, its ally

would attack the

aggressor in question.

Drafted on

17th August

1892, final

in 1894.

France

and

Russia

France had been left diplomatically isolated since its defeat in the

1871 Franco-Prussian War and due to the policies of Otto von

Bismarck. It needed allies. France and Russia both feared the

combined power of the Triple Alliance and despite political

differences, they agreed to help each other if either of them was

attacked.

Entente Cordiale (cordial

agreement) – a series of

agreements between

Britain and France ending

almost a thousand years

of conflict between the

two nations.

8th April

1904

France

and

Britain

The agreements settled many colonial issues. France recognised

British control over Egypt while Britain reciprocated regarding

French control over Morocco. Britain ended its policy of ‘splendid

isolation’ mainly due to a growing fear of isolation in the face of a

newly aggressive Germany. However the Entente Cordiale was NOT

a formal military alliance like the Franco-Russian Alliance.

Anglo-Russian Entente –

an agreement ending

colonial rivalries in

Central Asia.

31st August

1907

Russia

and

Britain

The Anglo-Russia entente ended colonial rivalries, particular over

Iran, India, Afghanistan and Tibet. Both nations were rivals for

power and resources in the region and this rivalry was known as ‘the

Great Game’. By the early 20th century Britain was concerned by the

cost of defending against a possible Russian invasion of India and

sought to ease tensions. Following defeat in the Russo-Japanese

War of 1904-05 and attempted revolution at home, Russia also

sought to ease tensions. The result was the Anglo-Russian

Convention of 1907.

Triple Entente – the end-

product of the three

previous agreements.

31st August

1907

Britain,

France

and

Russia

The Triple Alliance was not a formal agreement or military alliance.

Rather, the entente was the combined result of the previous three

agreements between Russia, France and Britain. The spirit of the

three agreements stated that they had a ‘moral obligation’ to

support each other. After WW1 broke out, the Entente powers

signed a formal military alliance.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=cnUaHxAvToA3xM&tbnid=ZNk6ettMU_HXHM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/books/review/the-sleepwalkers-and-july-1914.html&ei=D7bhUo_uHpGjiAfvv4DABg&psig=AFQjCNFxXCd0bkHMkaLRDdQK2K_lh8afJQ&ust=1390610144100771

4.) Economic Causes of International Rivalry

Country Strengths of Economy Economic Threats and Weaknesses

Britain

Britain had been the first country in the world to go through an industrial

revolution. In the 1800s Britain had become rich through the manufacture and

sale of home-produced goods, exporting huge quantities of manufactured items

to its colonies. In 1914 it still led the world in trade, finance, shipping, and had

strong manufacturing bases and mining. The City of London was also the

financial centre of the world. Britain had vast investments and reserves

overseas which it could use to pay for supplies during World War One.

Britain was increasingly concerned about Germany whose

growth rate, manufacturing output and GDP were beating

Britain. British industry was slow to adapt to global changes

and Britain relied on the Empire to support its economy.

Britain feared a growing German navy which could endanger

its control over its colonies and trade routes.

Germany

By 1914 Germany was producing more iron, more steel, more coal and even more

cars than Britain. Germany was also showing a keen interest in gaining colonies,

which would give it access to cheap raw materials and markets into which to

sell its goods. By 1914 it controlled a staggering 90% of the world’s chemical

industry and also dominated in electrical equipment, dyes and pharmaceuticals.

As a major industrial nation, German made money by

importing raw materials and exporting finished products

abroad. The lack of overseas colonies and a small navy

meant that Germany was vulnerable to blockade in a time of

war. This would lead Germany to seek an overseas empire

and larger navy, a move seen as threatening by the British.

Russia

From the 1890s onwards, the Russian economy was one of the fastest growing

in Europe helped by French and British capital investment. Railroads and

agriculture received investment along with a focus on the armaments industry.

Growth averaged 9% in the 1890s and 5% in 1900-14 but this was from a very

low base.

The Russian economy was the poorest of the major powers.

85% of the population were still peasants in 1914 who

survived on subsistence farming. Russia had vast resources

but these undeveloped due to the climate and transport.

France

Despite the fact that the French economy had been declining throughout the

19th century, France could still rely on its large empire to provide resources

and manpower. France was also mostly self-sufficient in food and energy

resources. From the 1890s, France experienced an economic and industrial

boom due to its growing colonial empire and increased its investments abroad,

especially in Russia.

The French economy was still largely agricultural based and

run by small family businesses. They struggled to out-match

German industrial might or have the ability to leverage

large investment loans like the British. Its growing colonial

ambitions was bringing it into conflict with both Germany

and Britain.

Austria-

Hungary

Having industrialised relatively later than other countries, Austria-Hungary

enjoyed high growth rates preceding 1914. It was the 4th biggest machine

manufacturer in the world and was a huge food exporter to Britain and

Germany.

Although A-H experienced high growth, it was largely

centred in Hungary and wealth was mostly concentrated

amongst the landowning aristocracy. Austria also lacked an

overseas empire to supply resources or an export market in

times of war.

Italy

Italy, along with Russia, was unfortunately the poor man of Europe. The Italian

economy did experience growth in the years before 1914 but mainly in the

industrialised cities of the north. Southern Italy was intensely poor,

agricultural and backward.

Italy was still a largely agricultural country and

industrialisation had only affected the north of the

country. Nearly 25 million people had emigrated between

1880-1914 leaving Italy with a shortage of manpower.

159

6550

40.8 39.6 35

0

50

100

150

200

Population: home (millions)

Russia

Germany

Austria Hungary

Britain

France

Italy 0 1550

390

584

0

100

200

300

400

500

Population: overseas (millions)

Russia

Germany

Austria Hungary

Britain

France

Italy

0.18

1

0.2

1.2

0.4

0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Value of annual trade (£ millions)

Russia

Germany

Austria Hungary

Britain

France

Italy

3.6

14

5

11

4.63.7

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Steel production (million tons)

Russia

Germany

Austria Hungary

Britain

France

Italy

5.) Imperial Causes of International Rivalry

Country Major Colonies Owned Problems and Threats

One of the issues that led to tension between the Great Powers in the early twentieth century concerned the ownership of land overseas – colonies.

Colonies provided cheap raw materials for industry and were also a place where European countries could export their home-produced goods. It was thought

that the more colonies a nation had, the more powerful it became. This is why under Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany sought its own ‘place in the sun’.

Britain

Britain had the largest empire in the world covering more

than 11,400,000 sq miles and reigned over 400 million

people. Colonies included: India, Ireland, Canada, Australia,

New Zealand, South Africa, Egypt, Sudan, Rhodesia,

Singapore, Malacca, Java, Burma, Hong Kong, Gibraltar,

West Indies.

Despite its size, the profits made from empire were declining by 1914 and

the costs of defence were rising. The Irish in particular were demanding

home rule. The Boer War in South Africa (1899-1902) had exposed British

military weaknesses. Russia was threatening British interests in Central Asia

(ended in 1907) and German expansion in Africa was beginning to worry the

British. Britain’s main concern was therefore in maintaining its supremacy in

the world and preventing any one power from dominating Europe.

Germany

Germany had also been a continental land-based power and

had grown rapidly in the 19th century. The focus of

Germany’s expansion changed when Wilhelm II became

Kaiser. He encourage a ‘new imperialism’ overseas. By 1914,

Germany’s main colonies were: Namibia, Cameroon,

Togoland, German East Africa, Shandong (China), German

Samoa.

Germany only had a small and poor empire but its desire for more colonies in

Africa brought it into conflict with Britain and France. The building of a

navy to rival Britain and the Kaiser’s open support for the Boers in the

South African War only served to push Britain towards France with the

signing of the Entente Cordiale in 1903. This push for an overseas empire

ultimately upset the balance of power internationally.

France

The French empire was the second biggest in the world and

was able to provide France with manpower and resources

throughout WW1. Its main colonies were: Algeria, Morocco,

Tunisia, Chad, Senegal, Vietnam, Laos and most of West

Africa.

Like Britain, the French empire was huge but by 1914 was draining French

finances. Groups in Indo-China (Vietnam) were constantly rebelling and the

cost of fighting was huge. The French also faced competition in Africa,

especially from Germany. The Moroccan Crises (1905-6 + 1911) both nearly

led to war between France and Germany.

Austria-

Hungary

Austria-Hungary was the second biggest country in Europe

in 1914 and the third most populous yet it did not have any

overseas colonies. Instead, the empire was a multinational

realm which ruled over the parts of these modern day

countries: Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic, Montenegro,

Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine.

Austria-Hungary ruled over an empire of over eleven different nationalities

and many of these wanted their own independence. The rising tide of

nationalism in the Balkans were create a series of tensions and conflicts

that would eventually led to war in 1914.

Russia

Like Austria-Hungary, Russia had no overseas colonies – it

was a huge land-based empire. However Russia was seeking

to expand into Manchuria (China), The Balkans and Persia

(Iran). Russia also ruled over most of modern day Eastern

Europe and the Central Asia Republics.

Russia’s aim to expand into Central Asia brought it into conflict with Britain,

especially in Afghanistan, Persia, Tibet and India. Russia also came into

conflict with the Austrians in the Balkans, where Russia was encouraging

Slavic nationalism and the rise of Serbia. In the East, its push into

Manchuria brought Russia into conflict with Japan, leading to its defeat in

the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05). This defeat also led to Russia seeking

peace with Britain in 1907 (Anglo-Russian Agreement).

Italy

Modern Italy had only been created in 1861 and as such,

was one of the last powers to establish an empire. By 1914,

Italy ruled over: Eritrea, Somalia, Libya, Docecanese

Islands (Turkey) and Tietsin (China).

Italy’s new empire was tiny and didn’t really benefit them economically to

any great extent. The weakness of the Italian military was also illustrated

in its failed attempt to conquer Ethiopia in the First Italo-Ethiopian War of

1895-96. Italy’s desire to conquer more lands from the crumbling Austro-

Hungarian empire would lead it to join the Entente powers in 1915, rather

than honouring its agreement to the Triple Alliance.

6.) Military Causes of International Rivalry

What is

militarism?

The culture of militarism was persuasive in many European capitals prior to the First World War. Militarism generally

refers to the domination of government and decision makers by military elites. Governments often became dominated by

Generals and military planners who fuelled arms races by demanded increases in military spending. They also contributed

to the mood of war by drawing up war plans and promoting military solutions to political and diplomatic problems.

Why was

militarism

strong in

Germany?

Militarism was strong in Germany mainly due to the undemocratic nature of German government. The German army was

formed from the old Prussian army and was therefore dominated by the Junkers, a small but powerful group of Prussian

aristocrats. Prussia had been the most powerful of the Germanic states prior to unification, both in political and military

terms. The Prussian army had been reformed and modernised by Field Marshal von Moltke in the 1850s. Under von

Moltke’s command the Prussians developed a rigorous training regime for officers; they also incorporated new weaponry

and communication technologies into their military strategy. After 1871 the Prussian army formed the core of the new

German imperial army. The kaiser was the supreme commander of the army; he relied on a military council and chief of

general staff, made up of Junker aristocrats and career officers. The Reichstag, Germany’s elected civilian parliament,

exercised very little say in military matters. In many respects the Germany military existed as a part of the government,

rather than being a servant of the government. Therefore many events before 1914 were driven by the demands of

German military planners and Generals.

What was

the arms

race?

It is natural for military leaders to be obsessed with modernising their forces and equipping them with new technology,

and the decades prior to 1914 saw no shortage of this. One of the most significant developments were marked

improvements in the calibre, range, accuracy and portability of heavy artillery. This would allow artillery shelling and

bombardments to become standard practice, particularly after the emergence of trench warfare. Machine-guns, first

developed in 1881, became smaller, lighter, more accurate, more reliable and much faster (some were capable of firing up

to 600 rounds per minute). Millions of metres of barbed wire, an invention of the 1860s, would be mass produced and

installed around trenches to halt charging infantry. Various types of poison gas – chlorine, phosgene and mustard – were

developed. On the oceans, the development of the dreadnought – a large battleship, the first of which was launched in

1906 – prompted a flurry of ship-building and naval rearmament.

Rising

military

spending

European military expenditure skyrocketed between 1900 and 1914. In 1870 the combined military spending of the six

great powers (Britain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia and Italy) totalled 94 million pounds. By 1914 this had

quadrupled to 398 million pounds. German defence spending during this period increased by a massive 73 per cent,

dwarfing the increases in France (10 per cent) and Britain (13 per cent). Russian defence spending also grew by more than

one-third. Its embarrassing defeat in the Russo-Japanese War (1904-5) prompted the tsar to order a massive

rearmament program. By the 1910s, 45 per cent of Russian government spending was allocated to the armed forces, while

just five per cent went on education. Every European power but Britain increased conscription levels to bolster the size

of their armies. Germany alone added 170,000 full-time soldiers to its army in 1913-14. Germany also dramatically

increased its navy: in 1898 the German government, largely at the Kaiser’s behest, ordered the construction of 17 new

vessels. The Germans also pioneered the construction of military submarines: by 1914 the Kaiser’s navy had 29

operational U-boats. These developments caused alarm in Britain, and London responded by commissioning 29 new ships

for the Royal Navy.

d

7.) Nationalism and Rivalry in the Balkans

Country Background Aims in the Balkans

The

Ottomans

Since the 1600s, most of the Balkans (a poor,

mountainous region of south-east Europe)

had been part of the Ottoman Empire. The

Ottomans were Muslim rulers of what is now

modern day Turkey. By the 19th century the

Ottomans were in decline: Greece (1832),

Serbia (1878), Montenegro (1878) and

Romania (1878) had all won their full

independence. Other states became semi-

independent like Bulgaria (1878) and the

Ottomans were forced to let Austria-

Hungary ‘administer’ Bosnia-Herzegovina in

1878.

The primary aim of Ottoman foreign policy was to prevent revolutions and

the collapse of its European Empire. Essentially, the Empire was too big

and too expensive for the army to keep control everywhere. It was facing

a growing tide of nationalism from the many ethnic groups within the

Empire like Bosnians, Serbs and Croats who all wanted their independence.

The Ottomans also faced competition in the Balkans from Russia and

Austria-Hungary who were both trying to extend their influence in the

area. Russia in particular was actively supporting and encouraging Slavic

independence.

Austria-

Hungary

Austria-Hungary had a large and scattered

Empire in central Europe with its capital in

Vienna. It was ruled by the Habsburg family

and is often referred to as the ‘Habsburg

Empire’. The Empire ruled over 11 different

nationalities like Slavs, Czechs, Serbs,

Bosnians and Croats.

Like the Ottomans, Austria-Hungary wanted to both extend and preserve

its power in the region and stop the growth of Balkan nationalism as it

threatened to break up the empire. Since its independence in 1878, Serbia

had been keen to extend its influence in the Balkans. Many Serbs lived in

the Austro-Hungarian Empire and wanted to unite with Serbia. If this

happened, other ethnic groups might also seek their independence from

the empire like Czechs and Croats. Austria-Hungary was therefore keen to

confront the growing power of Serbia and take advantage of the

weakening Ottoman Empire.

Russia

Russia was a huge country and empire that

shared a southern border with the Ottoman

Empire across the Black Sea and the Balkans.

Russia had been at war with the Ottomans

several times in the 19th century. In 1877-78,

Russia had supported the Bulgarians and

other Slavic nationalities in rising up against

the Ottomans by sending troops and supplies.

Russia saw it as an opportunity to gain

influence in the area.

Russia’s primary concern was to gain access to the Mediterranean Sea for

trade. To reach the Mediterranean, Russian ships had to sail through the

narrow Dardanelles straight, controlled and closed off to them by the

Ottomans. Russia was therefore determined to establish pro-Russian

governments in the Balkans, which would allow their ports to be used to

transport Russian goods in the Mediterranean.

The Russian were also Slavs and many Slavs in the Balkans were Christian

and belonged to the Russian Orthodox Church. Russia was keen to promote

Slavic nationalism and help Slavic people win their freedom from the

Ottomans. If this also threatened the break-up of Austria-Hungary then

more the better.

8.) The Bosnian Crisis: 1908

Causes What happened? Consequences

Young Turk Revolution, April

1908 – Group of army officers in

Turkey overthrow the rule of

Sultan Abdul Hamid and

introduce a series of reforms to

modernise the Ottoman Empire.

Austria-Hungary was alarmed at

the prospect of a stronger,

modernised Turkey and wanted

to prevent the Ottomans from

recovering the province of

Bosnia-Herzegovina which

Austria-Hungary had been

allowed to administer since 1878.

Serbian Nationalism – Serbia

was unhappy with the status quo

and wanted to take over Bosnia-

Herzegovina. Relations with

Austria-Hungary deteriorated

over the issue and by 1907,

Austria-Hungary was planning to

annex Bosnia-Herzegovina to

prevent Serbian influence from

spreading.

On 6th October 1908 Austria-Hungary announced the annexation of Bosnia

and Herzegovina and made it an official territory of the Habsburg

Empire. The Ottomans, Serbia and Russia all objected to the annexation.

Despite the fact that the 1878 Treaty of Berlin had given Austria-

Hungary special rights to ‘occupy and administer’ Bosnia-Herzegovina, the

Ottomans still technically owned and ruled the provinces and considered

that their territory had been seized. The Ottomans protested and

launched a boycott of Austro-Hungarian trade goods but was too

concerned with Bulgaria’s declaration of independence on 5th October to

do anything about the annexation of Bosnia Herzegovina.

Serbia strongly objected to the annexation as it had designs of its own on

the province. It hoped to bring Bosnian Serbs into Serbia. On 7th October

Serbia mobilised its army and demanded that the annexation be reversed.

It asked Russia for help to stop the annexation.

Russia responded by accusing Austria-Hungary of betraying its

confidence and considered war. On 22nd March 1909, Germany made it

clear to Russia that unless it agreed to the annexation, it would ‘let things

take their course’ and support Austria-Hungary if war occurred.

Russia backed down in the face of this threat, as did Serbia, and the

crisis ended when Austria-Hungary agreed to pay the Ottomans

compensation of £2.2 million for the annexation.

Serbia and Russia were

humiliated and were

determined to win the

next dispute. Russia

begins to invest heavily

in its armed forces.

Austria-Hungary begun

to see the Serbs as a

real threat and was

reassured by the fact

that Germany had

stood by it – this

encouraged Austria-

Hungary to become

even more assertive in

the region.

The ‘Black Hand’

terrorist organisation

was created in Serbia

which would later

assassinate Franz

Ferdinand.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=WTvKW9ybX60RVM&tbnid=GsCahzS9z_x6BM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_World_War_I&ei=ANnoUsygO4qfiQfKj4GIBg&psig=AFQjCNH7wfjzr3VQOaT3RdCFWXSvLjwjSw&ust=1391077576273624

9.) The Balkan Wars: 1912-13


The F

irst

Balkan

War

Fall of the Young Turks – After

defeat to Italy in the Italo-

Turkish War of 1911-12, the

Young Turk group fell from

power in Turkey. The Balkan

countries saw this as an

opportunity to attack the

Ottoman Empire.

Formation of the Balkan League –

With the encouragement of

Russia agents, a series of loose

agreements between Serbia,

Bulgaria, Greece and Montenegro

formed into an alliance. All four

powers wanted to take land away

from the Ottoman Empire.

The First Balkan War broke out on

8th October 1912 when the Balkan

League (Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia

and Montenegro) attacked the

Ottoman Empire.

The Ottomans were primarily

defeated by the actions of the

Greek navy, which prevented the

Ottomans from transferring

reinforcements from the Middle

East to Europe, across the

Dardanelles Straight.

The war ended seven months later

with the Treaty of London. The

Ottomans had lost virtually all of

its Balkan possessions.

Turkey lost nearly all its lands in Europe and over

2.5 million Muslim Ottoman Turks were forced to

flee to the Turkish heartland.

All four Balkan League powers extended their lands

in the Balkans, making Serbia especially more

powerful.

The province of Macedonia was divided amongst

Serbia and Greece, angering the Bulgarians which

would led to another war.

Albania used the confusion of war to declare

independence. This was backed up by Austria-

Hungary in the London Conference which ended the

war. This angered Serbia who was hoping to gain

access to the Sea by annexing Albania.

The S

eco

nd B

alkan

War

Bulgaria was unhappy with the

territory it gained in the First

Balkan War. It had been

promised part of the province of

Macedonia, which was eventually

taken by Serbia and Greece. This

angered Bulgaria into using force

to recover these provinces.

The Second Balkan War broke out

on 16th June 1913 when Bulgaria

attacked Serbia and Greece.

The Bulgarian offensive was

repulsed by the Serbian and Greek

armies and they counter-attacked

in to Bulgaria. Romania and the

Ottomans also attacked Bulgaria.

It ended in the Treaty of

Bucharest with Bulgaria loosing

most of the territories it had

gained from the First Balkan War.

Bulgaria’s aggression against Serbia (Russia’s main

ally in the region) had permanently damaged

relations between Russia and Bulgaria. Bulgaria

would go on to support the Triple Alliance in WW1.

Russia now only had one ally in the region – Serbia –

and felt obliged to support Serbia unconditionally.

This would led to Russia’s willingness to back Serbia

without question in 1914 – leading to WW1.

Serbia gained huge amounts of land in the wars and

became vastly more powerful. This worried Austria-

Hungary. Both sides now realised that only a war

could resolve tensions between each other.

10.) Anglo-German Naval Race: 1906-1912

Causes What happened? Results

Kaiser Wilhelm II was a keen

sailor and jealous of the

British fleet. He wanted to

build his own ocean-going fleet

to compete with the British.

There was also the belief that

a deep-sea fleet was needed in

order to secure colonies and

protect imperial trade.

Germany also feared a British

naval blockade of its coastline.

In 1897, the British foreign

office had threatened to

blockade the German coast if

Germany intervened on the

side of the Boers in the

African Boer War. A stronger

navy might prevent the British

from doing this.

British naval policy was the

‘two-power standard’. The

British navy would always try

to be as big as the next two

biggest navies combined. So as

Germany began to enlarge her

fleet, Britain was obliged to

follow its policy and build

more, resulting in a race.

German Grand Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz, Secretary of State of

the German Imperial Naval Office, championed and persuaded the

Parliament to pass four Fleet Acts between 1898 and 1912,

providing funding for the construction of a larger fleet. The aim

was to be at least 2/3 the size of the British fleet, big enough

to inflict serious damage, therefore the British wouldn’t ‘risk’ a

confrontation with the German fleet.

The British navy responded with a rearmament campaign, resulting

in the construction and launching of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 –

17,900 tons; 526 feet in length; ten 12 inch guns; eighteen 4 inch

guns; five torpedo tubes; 11 inch armour; top speed 21.6 knots.

HMS Dreadnought was revolutionary in its design and was so

powerful, it made all other naval ships redundant. This had the

effect of altering the balance of power, as now Germany could

match the power of the British navy if it could build more

Dreadnought class ships. An arms race then ensued.

The naval race between Britain and Germany generated huge

public support on each side. The British public coined the slogan,

‘We want eight and won’t wait!’, referring to the number of

dreadnoughts they wanted the government to build.

The arms race was ended in 1912 by the German chancellor

Bethmann Hollweg. Hollweg was concerned by the increasing size

of the Russian army and needed to switch funding from the navy

to the army. He also wanted to ease tensions with Britain, as

Germany was becoming increasingly isolated.

By 1914, Britain

had built 29

Dreadnoughts

whilst Germany

had built 17.

Germany had

successfully built

a fleet that

according to its

‘risk theory’ could

pose a significant

threat to the

British. As a

result, there was

only one major

naval battle during

WW1 – Jutland.

The competition

and fear

generated by the

naval arms race

led Britain to view

Germany as a

threat, which only

served to push

Britain into a

stronger military

partnership with

France and Russia.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=r6X4M_H5k5U0-M&tbnid=VWdTZ8r5o7huQM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Naval_Laws&ei=XYn5UpLcDue0iQfshoGQCQ&psig=AFQjCNH7xBpjYQzlQ-KQ4hLeZpI_WbGH6A&ust=1392171288853531

11.) First Moroccan (Tangier) Crisis: 1905-6


Morocco was one of the

last independent countries

in North Africa. France

was trying to increase its

influence in Morocco and

sought to turn the country

into one of its colonies.

Germany was looking for an

opportunity to increase its

empire in Africa and also

sought to protect its

commercial interests in

Morocco.

Germany also sought to

increase tensions between

France and the UK, in an

attempt to test the

strength of the recently

signed ‘Entente Cordiale’

(1904). The issue of

Morocco seemed to be the

perfect opportunity to

challenge the French.

On 31st March 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II landed at

Tangier, Morocco and conferred with representatives of

Sultan Abdelaziz. He declared support for the

independence of Morocco – challenging French influence

in Morocco.

The Sultan subsequently rejected French-proposed

government reforms and under the advice of the

Germans, issued invitations to a major world conference

to advise him on necessary reforms. The Germans sought

to isolate and embarrass the French.

The French foreign minister (Delcasse) responded by

saying there was no need for a conference. The German

Chancellor (Bulow) threatened war over the issue. By

mid-June, the French army began to mobilise however

the French Premier (Rouvier) refused to risk war with

Germany over the issue and agreed to attend the

conference. Delcasse resigned.

The Algeciras Conference (Spain) began on 16th January

and ended on 7th April 1906. The only country that

supported Germany was Austria-Hungary, and the

Entente Cordiale between France and Britain held firm.

Germany was forced to accept a face-saving compromise

agreement: Moroccan independence was agreed but

France gained control over Moroccan political and

financial affairs.

The Algeciras Conference

solved the crisis and both

France and Germany de-

mobilised their armies.

However relations between the

Triple Alliance and Triple

Entente countries was damaged

– Germany was now seen as a

serious threat.

It also strengthened the

Entente Cordiale as Britain had

defended France in the crisis

and Britain began detailed

military discussions with the

French. It also drew Britain

closer to the Russians,

resulting in the Anglo-Russian

Entente in 1907.

Kaiser Wilhelm II was angry at

being humiliated and was

determined not to back down

again, which led to the Second

Moroccan Crisis.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=1wSrZhm5UsA2GM&tbnid=842QncWM1rBxLM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.questconnect.org/wa_morocco.htm&ei=1qD5UpHmLYWziQfY6IDoBQ&psig=AFQjCNFc9qY2tpl96o2hTFkHuo7GQUep4A&ust=1392177718626535

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=Pf6BO5k61nzygM&tbnid=oVJwLR0K_2cyEM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.naval-history.net/WW1NavalStartPolitical.htm&ei=f6H5Ur-XKcnZigfNs4DQAw&psig=AFQjCNFc9qY2tpl96o2hTFkHuo7GQUep4A&ust=1392177718626535

12.) Second Moroccan (Agadir) Crisis: 1911


France was still keen to

extend its empire and take

over Morocco. When a

rebellion broke out against

the Sultan in April 1911,

France had the perfect

pretext to launch a

takeover, using the excuse

of ‘protecting European

lives and property.’

Anglo-German tensions

were also high in 1911. The

naval arms race between

Britain and Germany was at

its height and Britain was

concerned that Germany

was seeking to use its navy

to extend its influence in

Africa.

Germany was keen to form

an alliance with Britain and

wanted an opportunity to

‘test’ the relationship

between Britain and

France, possibly

intimidating Britain into an

alliance.

Despite the Act of Algeciras (1906) and the Franco-

German Accord (1909), which both guaranteed Moroccan

independence, in April 1911 France sent troops to Morocco

to ‘put down’ the rebellion against Sultan Abdelhafid in Fez.

This was interpreted as a hostile act by Germany.

Germany responded by sending the gunboat Panther to the

Moroccan port of Agadir on 1st July 1911 under the pretext

of ‘protecting German trade interests’.

Britain tried to restrain France from sending troops to Fez

but Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, said ‘what the

French contemplate doing is not wise, but we cannot under

our agreement interfere’, so Britain backed-up the French.

Britain was also worried as they believed Germany might

try to turn Agadir into a naval base, threatening Britain’s

base, Gibraltar, in nearby Spain. On 21st July 1911, David

Lloyd George gave a speech warning Germany to back-off:

‘If Britain is treated badly where her interests are vitally

affected, as if she is no account in the cabinet of nations,

then I say emphatically that peace at that price would be a

humiliation intolerable for a great country like ours to

endure.’

Despite the stand-off, Germany was forced to back down

and accept the French takeover as a financial crisis was

effecting the German economy. In the ensuing negotiations,

Germany accepted a French Morocco but in exchange,

France gave Germany control of 275,000 km of territory in

the African Congo.

Negotiations concluded

between France and Germany

with the Treaty of Fez (4th

November 1911) and France

subsequently established a

full protectorate over

Morocco on 30th March 1912,

ending Morocco’s formal

independence.

The Kaiser’s attempt to drive

a wedge between Britain and

France failed. British fear

and hostility of Germany

increased, and the crisis only

served to draw Britain closer

to France.

The result was a secret naval

agreement where the British

Royal Navy promised to

protect the northern coast

of France from German

attack, while France

concentrated her fleet in the

western Mediterranean and

agreed to protect British

interests there. This allowed

Britain to concentrate on

opposing the German High

Seas Fleet in the North Sea.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&docid=qXNP9AOH_M4YzM&tbnid=o8pu8rOS22ykxM:&ved=&url=http://www.manorhouse.clara.net/book3/chapter7.htm&ei=-g_7UsbxOI6jiQexhIDAAw&psig=AFQjCNF12hZSkTzPcyeh5P_xy_VGJ37eUw&ust=1392271739413017

13.) The Assassination of Franz Ferdinand and the

Countdown to War: June-Aug 1914


Serbia objected to the annexation of Bosnia by Austria-Hungary in 1908, in

which Serbia was powerless to stop Austria-Hungary. Many ethnic Slavs

lived in Austria-Hungary’s southern provinces (particularly Bosnia) and Serbia

hoped to bring these areas into its growing kingdom. This emboldened

nationalistic elements in Serbia to consider assassination as a means of

attacking Austro-Hungarian control in the region.

Serbian success in the Balkan Wars of 1912-13, in which Serbia conquered

Macedonia and Kosovo from the Ottoman Empire, enlarged the Serbian

state, further increasing Serbian power and confidence – further

emboldening nationalists to strike at Austria-Hungary.

On 28th June 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir

presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his

wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in

Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia, by Gavrilo Princip, one of

a group of six assassins.

The assassins were part of a group called the ‘Black

Hand’, supported by Nationalistic Serbian military

officers. The group was supplied by Serbian intelligence

with bombs and pistols and were also trained by them.

The

assassination

triggered a

series of

events known as

the ‘July Crisis’

which led

directly to war.

The Countdown to War

4TH July

Germany’s ‘blank

cheque’ to Austria-

Hungary

On 4th July, Kaiser Wilhelm II declared he was entirely for ‘setting accounts with Serbia’ and instructions the German

ambassador to Austria to stop advising restraint. On 5th July, the Kaiser met with the Austro-Hungarian ambassador

and informed him that his state could ‘count on Germany’s full support’ even if ‘grave European complications’ ensued.

This seemed to imply that Germany would back-up Austria-Hungary militarily if it decided to invade Serbia, regardless

of whether Russia tried to defend Serbia (which the Kaiser believed wouldn’t happen).

23rd July July Ultimatum

Austria blamed Serbia for the death of Franz Ferdinand and sent it an ultimatum. It was a list of ten firmly worded

demands, plus a requirement for the Serbs to respond within 48 hours, otherwise the Austrian ambassador would

leave Serbia. The demands were worded in a war that Serbia would find hard to agree with. Winston Churchill called

the ultimatum, ‘the most insolent document of its kind ever devised.’

28TH July Austria declares

war on Serbia

Serbia responded by agreeing to all the demands of the ultimatum except point six which demanded the Austro-

Hungarian law enforcement officers be allowed into Serbia to investigate the murder. Serbia viewed this as a breach

of its sovereignty and refused. At 11.00 AM on 28th July, despite British attempts to mediate a peace, Austria

declared war on Serbia and Austro-Hungarian ships on the River Danube begin to bombard the Serbian capital of

Belgrade. In Russia, partial mobilisation was ordered for the districts bordering Austria-Hungary.

30TH July Russia orders full

mobilisation of army

Nicholas II, under pressure from his army generals, orders the full mobilisation of the army. The German ambassador

in St. Petersburg informs Nicholas that Germany would mobilise if Russia did not demobilise at once.

1st August

Germany declares

war on Russia and

invades Luxemburg

Russia refuses to halt the mobilisation of its army and Germany uses this as a pretext to declare war. At 7.00 PM,

Germany troops begin the invasion of Luxemburg and Germany delivers an ultimatum to France, either renounce its

alliance with Russia or face a German attack. France authorises mobilisation of its army. Britain warns Germany that if

it invades Belgium, it would go to war.

2nd August German ultimatum

to Belgium.

Germany send an ultimatum to Belgium, requesting free passage for the German army on the way to France. King

Albert of Belgium refuses the German request. Italy declares neutrality!

3rd August

Germany declares

war on France and

invades Belgium.

Germany declares war on France for failing to remain neutral and begins its invasion of Belgium, as dictated by the

German Schlieffen Plan.

4th August Britain declares war

on Germany.

At 7 PM, Britain delivers an ultimatum to Germany to stop its invasion of Belgium by midnight. Britain had promised to

protect Belgium neutrality in the Treaty of London of 1839. Berlin failed to reply to the ultimatum so war was

declared.

6th August Austria declares

war on Russia. Austria-Hungary declares war on Russia and Serbia declares war on Germany.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Serbien_muss_sterbien.jpg

14.) The failure of the Schlieffen Plan: Aug-Dec 1914

What was it? What did it need

to succeed? Why did it fail? Effects

Germany had long feared a war on two

fronts, with France to the west and Russia

to the east. In 1905 Count von Schlieffen,

the Chief of the German General Staff,

prepared a plan to avoid having to fight on

both fronts at the same time.

He believed that due to the terrible state

of the country’s road and its inefficient

railways, Russia would take about six weeks

to mobilise. In the meantime, the German

armies would quickly knock France out of

the war and then deal with Russia.

The border with France was well defended

by strong French fortresses however

French defences along the Belgian frontier

were weak – however Belgium was a neutral

country whose neutrality was guaranteed

by the Great Powers including Britain (1839

Treaty of London).

Von Schlieffen decided to attack through

Belgium as the Belgium army was small. The

main French armies attacked through

Alsace-Lorraine, the German armies would

sweep through Belgium and into northern

France.

The French would realise their mistake too

late by which time Paris would have been

taken and the French armies surrounded.

With the fall of the capital, all French

enthusiasm for the war would collapse and

their armies would surrender.

Schlieffen did realise that Britain might

join the war but he believed that France

would be defeated before the British army

could land in Europe and make any impact.

The plan made

several

assumptions:

The Belgian would

not resist, or if

they did, they

would be easily

defeated and the

German armies

would quickly

advance through

the country.

The French would

attack through

Alsace-Lorraine

and would be too

slow to realise

their mistake and

disrupt the

German Plan.

Russia would take

at least six weeks

to mobilise and

Germany would

only need to send,

at first, a small

force to the east.

The British

Expeditionary

Force would arrive

too late to stop

the German

advance.

Belgian Resistance – The Belgians, using their forts, resisted and

slowed down the German advance. On 3rd August an army of over one

million Germans marched into Belgium. Deep concrete forts protecting

Antwerp, Liege and Namur delayed the Germans. Heavy guns had to be

brought up to pound the defences to rubble. Antwerp did not

surrender until October. Belgian resistance gave the British

Expeditionary Force (BEF) time to arrive.

Changes to the Plan – Von Schlieffen died in 1913 and his dying words

were ‘keep the right wing strong’. He urged that the right wing of the

German army should be six times stronger than any other. The new

German commander, von Moltke, ignored this advice and the army was

not strong enough to carry out the plan. The German armies that

invaded Belgium were 100,000 soldiers short because von Moltke sent

additional forces to reinforce the Russian Front. Schlieffen also

wanted a wide sweep through the Netherlands, Luxembourg and

Belgium. This was changed to a narrower sweep attack through Belgium

and Luxembourg. In addition, German armies were supposed to encircle

Paris. This plan was abandoned in early September and they moved to

the east, leading to the Battle of the Marne.

The BEF – The Kaiser had dismissed the BEF as a ‘contemptible little

army’. However the BEF, under the command of Sir John French

arrived on 18th August, more quickly than the German expected. It was

small but excellently trained. Von Moltke had to transfer troops from

the Eastern Front to face the BEF. On 23rd August, the BEF met the

Germans near the Belgian town of Mons. The BEF were outnumbered

and had to retreat but they delayed the German advance. Three days

later there was a further battle at Le Cateu. Again the British

retreated but the German were slowed down.

German Exhaustion – The advance through Belgium and into northern

France took its toll on the German soldiers.

French Resistance – The French attacked Alsace-Lorraine and

suffered heavy casualties. The delays achieved by the Belgians and

British gave the French time to move their troops towards Paris and

make a stand at the Marne River on 5th-19th September 1914. Taxis and

buses transported every available soldier from Paris to the front line.

British reconnaissance balloons spotted a gap between two German

armies, and the BEF and French armies counter-attacked into this gap.

The battle lasted over a week and the German armies were forced to

fall back to a safe position 60km north of the River Aisne.

The Battle of

the Marne

signalled the

failure of the

Schlieffen

Plan. Von

Moltke was

replaced as

German

commander

by Erich von

Falkenhayn

on 25th

October

1914.

The

German’s

dug-in along

the River

Aisne,

building

machine gun

posts and

trenches.

This marked

the beginning

of trench

construction

along the

Western

Front.

The Germans

were forced

to revert to

Plan B, the

race to

capture the

Channel

ports.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=myM-7WCE4E4kBM&tbnid=aRHkc_iKjvX6HM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://historicalfirearms.tumblr.com/post/52880905915/the-transition-from-a-war-of-movement-to-trench&ei=LxcCU9E-xKiIB9_KgfgF&psig=AFQjCNHgIaZJsa3qylAYi2OS7Bu_52LA2g&ust=1392732027768172

15.) What was the Trench System?

Reason for the construction of the Trench System

After the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, the Germans were forced to retreat to the River Aisne. The German commander, General Erich von

Falkenhayn, decided to hold onto the occupied lands of Belgium and France at all costs – victory in the west still seemed possible or at the very least, the

more land they held the better chance for a negotiated peace. Falkenhayn ordered his men to dig trenches to provide them with cover against the

advancing British and French troops. The Allies soon realised that they could not break through this line and they also began to dig trenches, to prevent the

Germans from advancing further. By the end of 1914, the trenches stretched from the North Sea to the Swiss Alps. The Germans generally held the

highest ground as they were first to decide where to stand and fight. This gave them a tactical advantage. Trenches were usually about seven feet deep

and six feet wide.

Element Description

Barbed-Wire

Thick barbed wire entanglements were used to protect the front line trenches. Barbed-wire was usually placed far enough from the

trenches to prevent the enemy from the trenches to prevent the enemy from approaching close enough to lob grenades in. They were

also used to channel attacking infantry into machine-gun fire. Barbed-wire entanglements were virtually impassable.

Communications

Trench

Communications trenches connected the front-line trenches to the support and reserve trenches and provided the only protected way to

the front-lines. They were dug at an angle to those facing the enemy to ensure better protection for the men, equipment and food

supplies being transported.

Duck-boards

Duck-boards were wooden planks placed on the bottom of trenches and across other areas of muddy or waterlogged ground. Most of the

land on the Western Front was only a couple of feet above sea level and standing in water caused Trench Foot after a while. Duck-boards

were used to keep the base of trenches and other routes dry.

Dugouts

Dugouts were protective holes dug out of the sides of trenches. The size varied and some could house over ten men. They also served as

the daily living quarters for the troops and their refuge from attack. They could be as deep as ten meters below ground level. Some

dugouts were reinforced with concrete to provide deep bunker protection from artillery attacks although this was often on the German

side, who had the advantage of higher and dryer ground.

Fire-Bays

Front-line trenches were not dug in straight lines. This was to prevent the enemy from firing straight along the line into the trench. The

French tended to build zig-zag trenches however the British army preferred a system where each trench was dug with alternative fire-

bays and traverses. Fire-bays were sections of trench where the troops did their shooting. Each fire-bay was protected at the side by a

barrier of earth and sandbags.

Fire-Step The fire-step was a step 2 or 3 feet high which allowed a soldier to see and shoot through the parapet of a trench.

Front Line

Trench

The front-line trenches were the first line of defence in the trench system and the most dangerous areas for soldiers to defend.

Almost every day, enemy shells would fall on the trenches and snipers would often try to pick-off visible soldiers. It is estimated that

one-third of all casualties on the Western Front occurred in the trenches. The British army worked on a 16 day timetable. Eight days in

the front line, four days in the reserve trench and four days at a rest camp a few miles away from the trenches.

Listening Posts Listening posts were areas in no man’s land where soldiers were sent at night to spy on enemy defences. Craters were often used for this

purpose. They were connected to the front-line trench by a narrow passage called a sap.

Machine-Gun

Posts

These were defensive positions used to house machine guns. The German often built concrete ‘pillboxes’ or blockhouses to give their

machine-guns extra protection. With very thick walls, German machine-gun posts were very difficult to destroy by artillery barrages.

No Man’s Land This was the ground between two opposing trenches. On average the distances was 230m but could be shorter. Soldiers crossing no

man’s land faced difficult terrain, full of waterlogged shell-holes, dead bodies and barbed wire.

Parados The Parados was the rear-side of the trench and was often protected by two-three feet of sandbags. Soldiers were instructed to build

the parados higher than the parapet so that the defenders were not outlined against the sky and easy targets for German snipers.

Parapet The front of the trench, protected by sandbags with gaps for soldiers to fire their weapons through.

Reserve

Trench

Reserve or support trenches were dug parallel and behind the front-line trenches in case the front line should be captured. They were

also a resting place for the troops. In some places, there were even third of forth lines of trenches.

Sandbags Sandbags were filled with earth and were used to absorb any bullets or shell fragments. Soldiers in ‘filling parties’ were expected to fill

sixty bags an hour. A typical bullet would penetrate up to fifteen inches into a sandbag.

16.) Life in the Trenches

Element of Life Description

Daily Life

Soldiers would spend on average 10 days a month in the firing line. 60% of their time was spent behind the lines. Most

days were very monotonous and boring and seemed to pass very slowly. Men sat around reading or smoking or playing

chess. Some wrote letters home. When not in the front line, soldiers were sent back to billets a few miles away. Here

men could undergo training, eat fresh food, have baths and get new clothing. Football matches and concerts were also

organised. Letters could also be sent home for free. These were checked by a censor before being posted. Anything

that might help the enemy or reduce morale on the home front was crossed out with a blue pencil.

Food

Troops did not go hungry although there was little variety in their diet. They often ate ‘bully’ or corned beef with ten

men sharing a loaf of bread. In an emergency there were always hard biscuits, Cooking facilities were very basic.

Some troops had no hot meal for weeks on end. Food was generally prepared in pots, making it all taste the same.

Water was brought in petrol cans to the front, where chloride of lime was added to kill germs. In winter, men even

melted snow and ice to make tea. The British army tried to give its soldiers a daily intake of 4000 calories. Tobacco

was widely available. Many soldiers actually put on weight and had a far better diet then back at home.

Hygiene

Diseases were common as men crowded together in unhygienic conditions. Everyone had lice – in his hair, body and

clothing. Men were occasionally deloused but the lice would reappear within a few days. Rats were everywhere,

feeding on rotting bodies and horse carcasses. Occasionally there were epidemics. Germs in food and water led to

typhoid, cholera and dysentery. Trench foot was the biggest problem – caused by a lack of circulation in the feet and

legs. If untreated, it led to gangrene and amputation. Later in the war, soldiers were provided with thigh-high rubber

waders and whale oil, rubbed into the feet. By mid-1915 trench foot had been almost eliminated.

Healthcare

Each battalion (700-1000 men) had one Regimental Medical Officer with a team of medical orderlies and stretcher-

bearers. A Regimental Aid Post (RAP) was usually set up in the reserve trench for lightly wounded soldiers. More

serious cases were sent to the Advanced Dressing Station.

Comradeship

Firm friendships were built by men who fought alongside each other. There was a real sense of ‘being in it together’.

Soldiers shared the same experiences and helped each other ease the fear and insecurity of life. A shared sense of

humour made the suffering more bearable. In the early years of the war, ‘Pals Battalions’ were formed in which

friends from the same area joined together and served together. Men often served alongside friends, neighbours and

workmates. This increased their desire to ‘stick it out’ and not let their friends down.

Weather

Trenches were exposed and soldiers had to put up with extremes if weather – snow and frost in the winter and rain

at any time of year made conditions miserable. A metre of water in the bottom of trenches was not uncommon.

Soldiers who stood in water for a long time developed trench foot, and in some cases, the foot had to be amputated.

Dangers

It is estimated that about one-third of all deaths and casualties occurred in the trenches. Soldiers faced numerous

problems. Enemy marksmen known as snipers waited for an unwary soldiers to pop his head above the parapet. Enemy

artillery bombardment occurred most days and many died from flying splinters and debris. Poisonous gas which was

first used by the Germans in 1915 caused death and a range of injuries. Many soldiers suffered from shellshock as a

result of the constant strain of living under shellfire. Early in the war, the army did not understand that shell shock

was a form of mental illness, and many men, unable to fight, were shot as cowards.

17.) New Weapons and Technology

Weapon Description Advantages Disadvantages

Gas

Gas was first used in August 1914 when the French deployed tear gas to slow the Germans

in Belgium but failed to kill them.

Poisonous gas was first used in the Second Battle of Ypres in April 1915, where the

Germans deployed chlorine against the French. When the gas reached them, the French ran

away however the German failed to capitalise.

By 1918, more than 63 types of poisonous gas had been used. It is estimated that the

Germans used 68,000 tons of gas, the French and British 36,000 and 25,000 respectively.

After 1915 deaths from gas were rare although each side continued to use it because it

injured soldiers and created disruption and panic. Initially, soldiers were advised to hold a

urine-drenched cloth to their face but in 1915, British soldiers were given efficient gas

masks. By 1918, Filter Respirators were standard.

Chlorine – caused

tremendous panic and killed

the enemy by choking and

damaging the lungs, so

victims’ lungs filled and

they drowned.

Chlorine – visible and

soldiers were able to

prepare for it. Also did

not kill in huge numbers

and wind could blow it

back!

Phosgene – Killed the enemy

due to lung damage. It did

not have a strong smell like

Chlorine therefore soldiers

inhaled large amount before

realising.

Phosgene – Did not kill in

huge numbers and could

be dispersed or returned

by the wind.

Mustard Gas – Blistered the

skin, ate the flesh and

caused internal and

external bleeding/blindness.

It was almost odourless,

colourless and difficult to

protect against.

Mustard Gas – Remained

in the soil for weeks

after so made capture of

infected trenches a hard

task. It did not kill in

huge numbers and took

12 hours to take effect.

Tanks

Tanks were first used by British forces in September 1916 during the Battle of the Somme

but only had limited success. British commander-in-chief Douglas Haig decided to use them

against the wishes of the commander of the tank corps, who wanted to only use them when

the army had huge numbers of the new machines. Haig wanted to use 50 immediately to be

able to boast some success on the Somme.

On 15th September 1916, 49 tanks began the attack at Flers, on the Somme. 17 broke down

on the way to British lines; another 9 failed to work and 5 others became stuck in ditches.

18 tanks moved slowly into no man’s land and were able to capture their objectives. Many

Germans fled, terrified of the new weapon. Over the next 3 days, 4 miles were gained on a

narrow front. However bad weather and a shortage of tanks meant initial successes could

not be built on.

The first major success came at the Battle of Cambrai in November 1917. The entire

British tank corps of 474 tanks was involved in action against the Germans. They broke

through German lines, and the supporting infanty were able to capture 10,000 German

prisoners, 123 guns and 281 machine guns. However the success was not sustained because

there were insufficient infantry reserves to follow up the breakthrough.

In the August 1918 (Battle of Amiens) Offensive, 604 tanks assisted the Allied advance of

32 km on the Western Front however by the fifth day, less than 50 were still working.

Terrified and

caused panic

amongst enemy

defenders

Could drive over

barbed wire and

allow infantry to

follow

Could traverse

difficult terrain

Provided a morale

boost to infantry

soldiers

Slow

Extremely hot

inside

Difficult to

manoeuvre

Difficult for

commanders

outside to

communicate

with the tank

crews

Soon became

stuck in the

mud

Mechanically

unreliable

Machine Guns

could penetrate

the armour

Aircraft

First flight was in 1903 and by 1914, aircraft technology was still poor. Huge numbers of

aircraft were built during the war but they were not hugely effective. They could perform

a range of tasks however they were slow and could not carry large numbers of bombs. At

first, pilots even had to use pistols to defend themselves. Eventually, machine-guns were

fitted that could fire between the propeller blades.

Aircraft were used to: destroy enemy aircraft; observe enemy trenches; take aerial

photographs; direct artillery fire; machine-gun enemy soldiers; bomb enemy trenches;

destroy enemy bases; observe troop movements.

Aircraft were often unreliable and could be easily shot down. Britain lost 1270 between

March-May 1917. Nearly all pilots were under the age of 25 and most had only 30 hours of

training. Pilots lived short lives.

Aircraft were

very effective at

reconnaissance.

Spotting enemy

artillery positions

and guiding their

own artillery onto

target became

their main role.

Weak armour

and could be

shot down easily

Couldn’t carry

many bombs

Slow speeds

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=81DvPm9bWacrkM&tbnid=Ds9kwHdgyCvURM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sopwith_Camel&ei=WHYCU620GuuRiQfwgoDQBA&psig=AFQjCNGu8mWRAxqG9KcefrceXsqV_knL5A&ust=1392756628910300

18.) Why was there a Stalemate for Three Years?

Reasons Explanation

The Trench

System

In the First World War infantrymen were supposed to attack quickly through gaps in the enemy trenches.

This proved impossible against trenches that were defended by barbed wire and sandbags.

Mud made cavalry charges ineffective.

The

Machine

Gun

Machine guns were ideal defensive weapons. They could fire up to 600 rounds a minute and were able to cut down

lines of attackers, causing huge casualties.

The German Maxim Gun accounted for 90% of Allied victims in the Battle of the Somme 1916.

The Failure

of New

Weapons

Several new weapons were developed but none was successful in helping to achieve a breakthrough.

The invention of the gas mask reduced the effectiveness of poisonous gas.

The early tanks were slow and cumbersome, and many broke down. They were not used effectively until 1918.

Heavy guns could cause considerable damage to enemy trenches but could not destroy the barbed wire or achieve a

breakthrough. If anything, they made the task of the attacking side even more difficult, since no man’s land became

badly churned up by the bombardment, thus slowing the advancing troops.

The flame-thrower was unreliable and quite likely to explode and kill the soldier using it.

The

Commanders

Trench warfare was a new kind of fighting. No one really knew how to win a war like this. So the generals fell back

on the ideas they had used successfully in past wars, such as mass cavalry or infantry attacks.

The French commander, Marshal Joffre, believed that the ‘spirit’ of the French soldiers would see them across no

man’s land.

The commanders on both sides persisted for three years with the belief that using large numbers of troops in an

attack would achieve a breakthrough against machine guns and barbed wire.

19.) The Battle of the Somme: July – Nov 1916


The Allied war strategy for 1916 was decided at the

Dec 1915 Chantilly Conference. An Anglo-French

offensive for summer 1916 was planned for the

Somme River valley, as it was the area of the front

where the French and British armies met, however

it was also the area in which the German defences

were strongest.

Haig believed in a policy of attrition or wearing

down the Germans by constantly attacking

The British secretary of State for War, Lord

Kitchener, had launched a major recruitment

campaign in 1915. As a result, the British army was

strengthened by about one million new recruits.

The German attacked the French fortress town of

Verdun in February, and the French were desperate

for help. The Somme was re-planned as a

diversionary campaign to relieve the pressure off

the French.

The offensive was preceded by a week long

bombardment, with 1500 guns shelling the German

lines continuously. The barrage did not destroy the

barbed wire and only informed the Germans of an

impending attack. They further strengthened their

defences.

When the shelling ended, the Germans, who had

been sheltering in deep dug-outs, quickly took up

their posts at the machine guns.

The first British soldiers went ‘over the top’ at 7.30

AM on 1st July 1916. They were there would be no

survivors and told to walk in line towards the enemy,

carrying heavy packs.

It went terribly wrong. The machine guns opened

fire, killing 20,000 and injuring 40,000 on the first

day alone. Despite heavy losses, Haig continued the

battle. In September tanks were used. Also, the

villages of Beaumont Hamel and Beaucourt were

captured using the new tactic, the creeping barrage.

Bad weather called it off in November 1916.

The British and Imperial

forces had over 400,000

casualties. Germany

suffered nearly 700,000

casualties.

The Germans had been

pushed back a little, 7

miles!

Haig was blamed and

called ‘the Butcher of the

Somme.’

Verdun had been relieved

and the French army

saved.

Why was the Battle of the Somme a disaster?

Failing Technology 1.75 million Shells were fired at German positions although 1/3 were duds and did not explode.

Haig did not have enough artillery cannons to destroy the trenches.

Poor Leadership

and Planning

Haig ignored reports that the barbed-wire had not been cut by the artillery bombardment.

Haig attacked the strongest part of the German lines.

Soldiers were told to walk across no man’s land in straight lines carrying heavy pack.

Haig failed to call of the attack despite the heavy casualties.

Factors outside

British Control

The Germans had built deep bunkers underground which protected German soldiers from the

artillery bombardment.

700,000 French soldiers had fallen defending Verdun and the French army could not spare

enough soldiers to contribute to the Battle of the Somme.

The Germans were skilled soldiers who were able to setup their machine guns in 5-minutes.

v

20.) Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele): Jul–Nov 1917


Haig needed to take the pressure off the French and

prevent their military collapse. Some of the French troops

has mutinied in April and May 1917 after the failed Nivelle

Offensive.

The Russians were suffering badly and were about to leave

the war, potentially leaving the Germans free to transfer

troops to the Western Front.

He still believed in attrition. He was convinced that the

Germans had been greatly weakened by the offensives of

1916 and were on the verge of collapse. He was also

personally committed to a ‘war-winning’ offensive in

Flanders.

He was convinced that he could achieve a quick

breakthrough at Ypres. The British could then advance

north and capture the Belgian ports of Zeebrugge and

Ostende, which were being used by the Germans as U-boat

bases.

The main attack was proceeded by an attack

on Messines Ridge, south of Ypres on 7th

June where 19 huge mines were detonated,

destroying the ridge but alerting the entire

German army.

An Initial bombardment of over 4.5 million

shells from 3000 guns was launched on 18th

July 1917. It lasted for ten days.

The first attack took place on 31st July 1917.

There was no breakthrough and, within a

week, the British had lost 30,000 men, By

October the fighting had reached the village

of Passchendaele, about 11km from the

starting point.

On 6th November Canadian troops finally

captured the village and then, because it was

so late in the year and the conditions on the

battlefield were getting worse, the

offensive was called off.

The British lost 250,000

men during the battle.

Haig reputation was

further discredited.

The British gained 11 km

of ground.

The Germans lost over

300,000 soldiers and had

been successfully

diverted from the French

further South, who were

still recovering from the

failed Nivelle Offensive.

Why was the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) a disaster?

Failing Technology Artillery bombardment failed to destroy the German defences.

Tanks and cavalry couldn’t move in the thick mud of the terrain.

Poor Leadership

and Planning

The German positions were on ridges above the town of Ypres that overlooked the British

positions. The Germans knew the British were planning a major attack.

Initially bombardment on the 18th July gave away the element of surprise.

Shelling churned the soil and destroyed the drainage system, flooding the terrain which made it

impossible to advance.

Main attack should have been at the Messines Ridge. Why did Haig wait a month?

Factors outside

British Control

Heaviest rain for 30 years turned the soil into a quagmire and prevented further advances.

Mud clogged the rifles and immobilised tanks. Men and horses drowned in their hundreds.

Shell holes just filled with rain water and provided no cover for advancing troops who couldn’t

keep up with the creeping barrage and were gunned down in their thousands.

Heavy rain meant planes could not spot artillery targets for the British.

The Germans used mustard gas for the first time which totally confused the British troops.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=t-NerHmosW8giM&tbnid=2WogyIXX8EGNNM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Passchendaele&ei=3bcCU8n9FsnIiAei_ICgDQ&psig=AFQjCNHChzGFJ8YacnYQO3Fpe3EgD_ZFTA&ust=1392773251365928

21.) What part did Haig play in the Stalemate?

Sir Douglas Haig was appointed commander of the British forces on the Western Front in December 1915. He has been

criticised by many people and was nicknamed the ‘Butcher of the Somme’ because of the heavy casualties during the

Somme offensive. He was blamed for his failure to break the stalemate.

Evidence for the ‘Butcher’ Evidence against the ‘Butcher’

Haig believed in a policy of attrition, which meant

wearing the enemy down with constant attacks even if it

meant heavy casualties

Haig faced a difficult task. Trench warfare was a new

kind of fighting.

Source A – Haig writing in 1919

In the course of the struggle, losses are bound to be heavy

on both sides, for in this the price of victory is paid. There

is no way avoiding this although our total losses in the war

may have been greater than were to be expected.

Source D – Haig writing in 1919

We attacked whenever possible, because a defensive policy

involves the loss of the initiative. The object of all war is

victory and a defensive attitude can never bring this about.

Source B – A letter written to the Daily Telegraph in

November 1916

We are slowly but surely killing off the best of the male

population of these islands. Can we afford to go on paying

the same sort of price for the same sort of gain?

Source E – A historian writing in 1991

If the criterion of a successful general is to win wars, Haig

must be judged a success. The cost of the victory was

appalling, but Haig’s military methods were in line with the

ideas of the time, when attrition was the method all sides

used to achieve victory.

Source C – From a school textbook about the First

World War, 1998

The High Command, and especially Haig, could not think of

any other form of warfare except to throw into battle

large numbers of men, month after month. Haig’s method

of winning the war was clumsy, expensive in loss of life and

based on a misreading of the facts.

Source F – From a modern world history textbook,

written in 2001

Haig believed that the key objective of his offensives were

achieved. The Battle of the Somme saved Verdun and the

French army. Passchendaele took the pressure off a

French army close to breaking point. Some of Germany’s

best troops were killed in both 1916 and 1917, preparing

the way for the Allied successes of 1918.

22.) The Gallipoli Campaign: 25th April – 9th Jan 1916


The attack on Turkey was the

idea of Winston Churchill, the

First Lord of the Admiralty,

who saw the attack at Gallipoli

as a way of breaking the

stalemate on the Western

Front. He believed that if the

Allies knocked the Turks out

of the war they could open up

an alternative front against

Austria & Germany.

The troops could not be

spared for the campaign so a

naval campaign was proposed,

with Allied ships sailing

through the Dardanelles to

the Turkish capital,

Constantinople.

The naval attack began on 18th

March 1915. The Turks had

put mines in the water, and 3

battleships were blown up,

forcing the Allies to call off

the campaign. It had failed

because the Allies had not

used proper minesweepers to

clear the Dardanelles.

The Allies now changed their plan to landings on the Gallipoli peninsula.

Troops would be used to capture the Turkish forts that guarded the

Dardanelles. They would attack the west coast of Gallipoli, cross

overland and capture the forts from behind. The attack was launched

on 25th April 1915, using a combination of British, ANZAC (Australian

and New Zealand Army Corps) and French troops led by Ian Hamilton.

The attack started with a British amphibious landing on five beaches at

Cape Helles, while the Anzacs landed further north at Anzac Cove. The

problem was that the Turks were already on all the beaches and mowed

down thousands of advancing troops. The soldiers did manage to secure

a foothold on the beach and dig in, resulting in a stalemate like the one

on the Western Front.

In August the British tried further landings at Suvla Bay, taking the

Turks unawares but the British commander delayed the advance and

the Turks managed to prevent any breakthrough inland.

The condition were terrible. Water was scarce & food was often

contaminated causing widespread dysentery. Of 7 ANZAC battalions

examined in September 1915, 78% of men had dysentery & 64% skin

sores. The dead were littered between trenches, rotting in the sun,

until both sides agreed a temporary ceasefire to bury the dead on 20th

May. In Winter temperatures drop and snow blizzards swept over men

without overcoats. On 28th November 15,000 died of exposure.

The Allies decided to call off the attack in December 1915. From 12th

onwards, groups of men were secretly lead away at night to waiting

boats and ferried away. More than 83,000 escaped without a single

death.

To most the campaign was a

disaster:

Turkey was not

knocked out of the war.

Bulgaria joined the war

on the side of the

Central Powers.

Churchill resigned due

to the campaign’s

failure.

There were 213,000

Allied deaths.

There were 300,000

Turkish deaths.

However the campaign did

have some minor

achievements:

The campaign diverted

the Turks from their

attack on Egypt and

attempts to seize the

Suez Canal.

No troops died during

the evacuation.

A few British

submarines sailed into

the Black Sea and

destroyed several

Turkish warships.

Why was the Gallipoli Campaign a Disaster?

Bad Planning

and

Leadership

The failed naval attack on the Dardanelles Straight was a disaster and alerted the Turks giving away the element of

surprise.

Detailed planning was not undertaken by senior commanders. No attempt was made to work out how many soldiers

and guns were needed.

Sir John French refused to allow any experienced commanders to leave the Western Front, starving the campaign

of experienced leadership. Hamilton’s only intelligence consisted of a 1912 manual on the Turkish army, old maps and

a tourist guidebook.

Failing

Technology

Warships used in the campaign were out of date and were of no help to the soldiers on land. Lack of minesweepers.

No airforce help or naval artillery support.

Other

Factors

Strong Turkish defence organised by German general Otto Liman von Sanders was unexpected and fierce.

Turkish soldiers occupied well dug in positions on hills and ridges above the beaches making it almost impossible for

the Allies to push in land.

23.) Key Events of the War at Sea: 1914-1915

British Navy German Navy

The British had the largest fleet, with 29 Dreadnoughts. These

were anchored at Scapa Flow, a protected and sheltered bay in the

Orkney islands, and at Cromarty. The battle cruisers were at

Rosyth.

The British also had a long naval tradition, having controlled the

seas throughout the 19th century.

Britain had one more advantage. Early in the war a German cruiser,

Magdeburg, was sunk by Russian ships in the Baltic Sea. The body

of a German officer was found clutching the German naval code

book. From then on Britain was able to decode German messages

and knew when enemy ships were leaving port.

The German fleet was smaller, with only 17 dreadnoughts in 1914. The

German High Seas fleet spent most of the time at its base in

Wilhelmshaven.

Germany had no naval tradition. The Kaiser had built up the navy in the

preceding 14 years.

Germany did have several advantages over Britain:

The German ships were of superior design, especially in the quality of

their steel armour protection.

The German gunners proved themselves to be superior marksmen.

Most German shells, unlike their British counterparts, exploded on hitting

enemy ships.

Event What happened? Results

British

Naval

Blockade:

August

1914 – July

1919

One of the first things Britain did on the outbreak of war was to order a naval blockade of Germany. This

meant stopping all ships heading for German ports and turning back or sinking any found to be carrying

food or supplies such as oil, steel or chemicals. During the war, about 12,000 ships were intercepted while

fewer than 80 slipped through. By 1916 there were serious food shortages, which led to riots in a number

of German towns. Some Germans called the winter of 1916 the ‘turnip winter’ because turnips seemed to

be the only food that people could get to eat.

British Victory

It is estimated that between

400,000-800,000 German

civilians died as a result of

starvation caused by the

blockade.

The Battle

of

Heligoland

Bight:

August

1914

This was the first naval battle of the First World War, and it took place in August 1914. Fast British

destroyers deliberately sailed close to the German coast. They were pursued by more powerful German

cruisers, which sailed into a trap – the British battle cruiser fleet under Admiral Beatty was waiting for

them further out at sea. Three German cruisers and a destroyer were sunk. This gave great

encouragement to the British public at this very early stage of the war, and Admiral Beatty became a

popular hero.

British Victory

Britain: 1 ship damaged, 35

killed, 55 wounded.

Germany: 6 ships sunk, 6

ships damaged, 712 killed, 149

wounded, 336 captured.

Result: German navy

instructed to remain in port.

German

Raids on

the East

Coast:

December

1914

In December 1914 the Germans decided to raid the east coast of Britain. This would (a) strike a blow at

the morale of the British people and the reputation of the British navy and (b) force the navy to spread

out its fleet along Britain’s North Sea coast. This, in turn, would allow the German fleet to target single

British ships without having to face the full ‘Grand Fleet’. The first raid was on Hartlepool at 8.10 AM on

16th December. Whitby and Scarborough were also shelled that day and about 500 civilians were killed or

wounded. The British public was outraged and, at first, criticised its own navy for failing to protect its

coastline. One British headline said, ‘Germans creep out to attack east coast’.

German Victory?

Britain: 137 killed, 592

injured, 3 ships damaged.

Germany: 3 damaged ships.

Result: Public outrage

towards the German navy,

recruitment boost in England.

The Battle

of Dogger

Bank:

25th

January

1915

On 24th January 1915 the British intercepted German radio signals suggesting the German battle cruiser

fleet was sailing to Dogger Bank to attack the British fishing fleet. Admiral Beatty’s battle cruisers lay in

wait and, in the ensuing battle, two German battle cruisers were sunk. The German fleet had been taken

by surprise and there were no further raids on the British coast. But the battle was not a total success

for the British. Beatty’s flagship, HMS Lion, was damaged and had to slow down, enabling remaining

German ships to escape.

British Victory

Britain: 2 ships damaged, 15

killed, 32 wounded.

Germany: 2 ships sunk, 954

killed, 80 wounded, 189

captured.

Result: Raids on England were

stopped but German ships

escaped.

24.) The Battle of Jutland: 31st May 1916


In an attempt to end

British control of

the sea and the

blockade of

Germany, Scheer

planned to lure the

British battle

cruisers into a trap

using his own cruiser

fleet.

British Admiral

Jellicoe, commander

of the British Grand

Fleet, had decoded

the German message

and come up with a

plan of his own.

On 31st May 1916, Beatty arrived first off the

coast of Jutland because his ships were faster

and he had less distance to travel. His cruisers

fought against the German cruisers led by Hipper.

It soon became clear that the Germans could fire

they guns more accurately and that there was

something seriously wrong with the British ships.

The armour plating on the gun turrets was too

thin, which meant that they were easily destroyed

by direct hits.

Two British cruisers blew up and at that moment

the great battleships of Scheer’s fleet arrived.

Beatty was in trouble and he steered north to lure

Scheer towards Jellicoe’s fleet. The Germans

followed the trap as Jellicoe’s fleet of

dreadnoughts opened fire.

Scheer and Hipper, realising they had sailed into a

trap, turned for home as night began to fall.

Jellicoe did not chase them until it was too late.

By morning, the Germans had escaped safely to

port.

British Victory?

The Germans had the best exchanges but

the British fleet was simply too large.

Britain = 14 ships sunk, 6094 killed, 674

wounded, 177 captured.

Germany = 11 ships sunk, 2551 killed, 507

wounded.

Britain Won = The Germans had fled the

battle and the German navy rarely went to

sea again, leaving the British blockade

untouched. A US newspaper said of the

battle, ‘The German fleet has assaulted its

jailor, but it is still in jail.’ The Germans was

forced to resort to unrestricted U-boat

warfare, which brought the USA into the

war.

Germany won = The German inflicted the

greater losses and the British suffered

heavier casualties. German gunnery and ship

design was also shown to be far better in

battle.

25.) German U-boat Campaign & Anti U-boat Measures

Date What happened? Results

1914:

Initial

Campaign

The initial aim of the U-boat campaign was to sink capital ships of the British Grand

Fleet, thereby reducing the Grand Fleet’s numerical superiority over the German High

Seas Fleet. In October 1914 the first attacks on merchant ships began

Allied Losses = 312,672 tonnes

German Losses = 5 U-Boats

1915: War

on

Commerce

In February 1915, the German government decided to broaden its attacks on

merchant ships supplying Britain. There were about 15,000 sailings each week to and

from British ports, and the Germans felt they had to try and cripple the British war

effort. They indicated that U-boats would attack any ship, regardless of country, in

British waters. This became known as unrestricted submarine warfare. The threat to

British food and other supplies from the USA was evident. On the 7th May 1915, the

passenger ship Lusitania was sunk with the loss of 1198 lives, some were US citizens.

There was an outcry in the USA and the Germans were forced to scale back their

operations.

Allied Losses = 1,307,996 tonnes


1916: The

High Seas

Fleet

The Germany navy spent most of 1916 trying again to trap the British Grand

Fleet, without success. U-boats continued to harass Allied shipping in the

Mediterranean and American waters.



1917:

Resumption

of

Unrestricted

U-boat

Warfare

In February 1917 Germany decided to begin unrestricted submarine warfare again in

the hope of bringing Britain to its knees. It was a gamble because there was always

the chance that the USA might enter the way if US vessels were attacked on a

regular basis. The Germans had great successes in 1917. By April Britain had only six

weeks’ food supply left. In response to the new submarine programme, the USA

declared war on Germany on 6th April.



1918: End

of the War

By 1918, the establishment of the convoy system had ensured that Allied ships were

protected and U-boat losses increased dramatically. By the Autumn, it was clear that

Germany would not win and on 24th October, all German U-boats were ordered home.



How did Britain manage to defeat the U-Boat threat?

Q Ships

This was first used in 1915. It looked like a harmless cargo vessel, but it carried powerful guns disguised as freight or

even as cabins on deck. When a U-boat surfaced to search the ship, the crew would wait until the enemy was on deck,

making it impossible for the submarine to dive quickly. Then the guns would be revealed and the U-boat sunk. This only

worked for a short period. U-boats soon stopped surfacing.

Horned

Mines

These were large round metal containers packed with explosives. Several spikes or ‘horns’ stuck out – if a ship touched a

horn, the mine would explode. By 1918 both the English Channel and the North Sea had been closed off by rows of deadly

mines under the surface, however U-boats would surface at nights and sail over these mines. Not until 1918 were

searchlight fitted across the Channel.

Depth

Charge

&

Hydrophone

A depth charge was a container about the size of a large oil drum, packed with explosives. It was dropped in the sea above

a suspected U-boat and could be set to explode at a certain depth. Some ships were fitted with hydrophones. Sounds

travel easily under water and an operator with headphones could hear a nearby submarine engine.

The Convoy

System

This proved the most successful idea and was introduced in June 1917. A convoy was a group of ships sailing together and

protected by fast warships such as armed trawlers or destroyers fitted with depth charges and hydrophones. From June

1917 to November 1918, 16,539 ships sailed in convoys and only 154 were torpedoed. In addition many more U-boats were

sunk whilst attacking the convoys.

Raids on U-

boat Bases

The British attempted to block off the U-boat bases at Ostend and Zeebrugge using block ships which were sunk at the

entrance to the harbours. These two attacks, in early 1918, had limited success and did not completely block off the

ports.

26.) Why did the USA enter the War in 1917?

Reason What happened? Results

The

Sinking of

the

Lusitania

At 3.10 PM on 8th May 1915, the British passenger liner Lusitania was sunk with the

loss of 1198 lives including 128 Americans.

Germany justified the attack by saying that the Lusitania was carrying munitions and

was therefore a legitimate target. This was later proved by historian to be correct.

However the British government was keen to portray this event as an atrocity in the

hope that the USA might join the war on the side of the Allies. The British Daily

Express claimed: ‘It is simply an act of piracy. Noting more.’

President Woodrow Wilson

demanded reparations from

Germany and an assurance that

such an attack would not recur.

As a result of the US reaction,

Germany cut back its attacks on

merchant shipping and ended

unrestricted submarine warfare,

which ensured the USA’s

continued neutrality.

The

Zimmerman

Telegram

Britain intercepted a coded message sent from the German Foreign Minister,

Zimmermann, to the German ambassador in Mexico. The message was to the effect

that if the USA entered the war, then Mexico should ally itself with Germany.

Germany was proposing financial aid to Mexico and, following a German victory, would

return to Mexico its former territories of Texas, Arizona and New Mexico, which

were by the part of the USA. Germany was also hoping to create some form of

agreement with Japan. If successful, these friendships would divert the USA’s

attention from the European war zone.

Britain gave the US government

a translation of the message and

it served to push the USA closer

towards the Allies.

Other

Reasons

Relations soured further between the USA and Germany in March 1917 when four US

ships were sunk with the loss of 36 lives.

The overthrow of Russia’s Tsar Nicholas II in the same month meant that Wilson and

others in the US government now felt more able to join Britain and France because

they would not be allying with the autocratic government of Russia. They could put

over the idea of a war being fought for democracy against the tyranny of Germany

and Austria-Hungary to the people of the USA.

On 6th April 1917, the USA

declared war on Germany.

What was the US contribution to the Allied war effort?

From the beginning of the USA’s involvement in the war, President Wilson stressed that it was seeking to remove the tyranny of

autocratic governments like that of Germany. Britain and France saw the total defeat of Germany as paramount, and France, in

particular, wanted to ensure that Germany would no longer be the most powerful country in Europe. The differing aims of the Allies were

to become problematic at the end of war as they attempted to agree a peace settlement with Germany.

By the end of 1917, there were over 200,000 US soldiers in Europe but they were not as well trained as the British or French. The

arrival of the US troops gave fresh impetus to the war-weary troops serving there. The USA troops in 1918 made important

contributions in defeating the German Spring Offensive, and in the final three months of the war at St Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne. In

total 4,355,000 US soldiers were mobilised for war, with 1,950,000 facing active service on the Western Front. Total casualties

amounted to 318,203 with 120,144 killed and 198,059 wounded.

27.) German Spring Offensive: March 1918

Causes What happened? Effects?

By the end of 1917, Germany’s new High

Command was aware that the longer the war

went on, the less likely Germany was to win.

They were also optimistic about the

potential for success in 1918:

Russia was forced to withdraw from the war

in 1917 and signed a peace treaty with

Germany March 1918. This enabled Germany

to transfer over 500,000 troops to the

Western Front.

American troops were being sent to France

and it wouldn’t be long before American

industry and manpower would begin to tell.

The British Naval Blockade was seriously

affecting German supplies. USA had stopped

trading with Germany as had Sweden and

Denmark – something had to be done.

Germany’s Allies Failing – Austria was in

stalemate in Italy and Turkey was being

pushed back in the Middle East. Germany

would soon be fighting alone and needed a

victory.

These causes persuaded General Ludendorff and Field

Marshal Hindenburg to launch a dramatic attempt to win the

war. Ludendorff’s aim was to cut through the Somme and then

wheel north-west to cut the British lines of communication.

He intended to avoid the British strong points and sweep the

British forces in order to cut them off from the French. The

offensive was codenamed Operation Michael.

The attack started on 21st March, using artillery and mustard

gas. The Germans used specially trained ‘stormtroopers’ –

small groups of soldiers that would surprise attack across no

man’s land, using cover to avoid mass casualties. They

advanced 8 km on the first day and the British retreated in

chaos. They eventually got to within 60 km of Paris.

The problem was they were too successful – the supporting

forces bringing supplies of munitions and food could not keep

up with the advance.

Many German soldiers actually wasted time looting French

shops in the areas they captured for food due to

malnutrition.

The offensive failed to push through Allied defences

completely, and the exhausted German soldiers could no

longer press the attack and it was called off in July.

By the end of the

offensive, 880,000

German casualties had

been suffered and

Ludendorff needed

200,000 fresh troops

each month to continue

the war. He was told

the reserves could only

supply about 300,000

for the whole of the

next twelve months.

The German High

Command had made its

gamble and now knew

that defeat was not far

away.

The Germans had left

the Hindenburg Line

and were dangerously

overstretched. This

gave the Allies the

perfect opportunity to

counter-attack.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=VcTiutB646CFpM&tbnid=yhAn83Fxx-xafM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.historylearningsite.co.uk%2Fgerman_spring_offensive_of_1918.htm&ei=ufQJU8H7HYmBiQejvoCoBg&psig=AFQjCNHIDcsDEa0lIKXXKM9KBnxMCSg9Gg&ust=1393246974462860

28.) Why did Germany collapse in 1918?

Cause What happened?

British

naval

blockade

of

Germany

This had a serious effect on the German war effort. Industry ran short of fuel and chemicals for explosives and gas. By

the end of the second year of war, imports had fallen by almost half on 1913 levels. Agriculture was severely hit by the

inability to import fertilisers. German ships were trapped in port. By 1916, food riots broke out in many German cities as

people demanded more bread. In the ‘turnip winter’ of 1917, the supply of potatoes ran out. By 1918 starvation had hit

millions of Germans and rationing was introduced. The constant queuing for food was eroding enthusiasm for the war.

About 120,000 died of hunger in 1916 and this figure rose to 290,000 in 1918. By 1918 there were riots and strikes as the

civilian population demanded an end to the war.

Entry of

the USA

into the

War

The entry of the USA on the Allied side certainly hastened the end of the war. It forced Ludendorff to gamble. It

greatly increased the morale of the Allied troops and gave the Allies the benefits of American industry and manpower,

whilst denying these to Germany. In total, around 2 million American soldiers served on the Western front.

Impact of

the

Bolshevik

Revolution

The impact of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was also important because many socialists in Germany saw the chance to

copy Lenin and remove the Kaiser. They saw the idea of establishing a socialist country as a real possibility, and there was

an increasing number of strikes in October 1918. Workers’ Councils were set up across Germany. A general strike was

proclaimed for 9th November in Berlin. German politicians were becoming worried – if they failed to change the

government, there might be the danger of a communist revolution.

Role of

Tanks

These proved a war winning weapon in 1918. They were used correctly by Haig on 8th August 1918 to force a gap in the

German trenches which was then exploited by infantry assaults.

Failure of

Operation

Michael

The failure of Operation Michael was the sign to the German High Command that they could not win the war. The

Germans suffered over 800,000 casualties and no longer had the manpower to resist Allied counter-attacks, especially

with the recent entry of nearly 2 million US soldiers. The Allied counter-attack launched on 8th August 1918 pushed the

Germans back on a 320km front. It was clear that an armistice had to be agreed otherwise the Allies would push them

back into Germany.

Defeat of

Germany’s

Allies

Germany's allies collapsed in 1918. Driven back by Serbian and French troops during 1918, the Bulgarian army surrendered

on 29th September. A month later, on 30th October, the Turkish forces surrendered to combined British and Arab

troops. On 3rd November the forces of the Austro-Hungarian Empire surrendered as Czech, Polish and other troops

mutinied against the hated Austrians.

Revolution

in Germany

Discontent in Germany due to food shortages and a serious flu epidemic which killed thousands led to the abdication of

the Kaiser and a new German republic. In October 1918, German sailors at the Kiel naval base mutinied and refused to

follow orders. The army was not sent to crush the mutiny and rebellions soon spread to Wilhelmshaven and other German

cities. Chaos reigned and Kaiser Wilhelm II was forced to abdicate on 9th November 1918. The new government of the

Social Democratic Party led by Freidrich Ebert concluded an armistice with the Allies on 11th November 1918.

http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=YIgYKmskWZRLEM&tbnid=iUDXXBiZR9IAVM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.revisionworld.co.uk%2Fgcse-revision%2Fhistory%2Fworld-history%2Fworld-war-one-1914-1918%2Fend-world-war-one&ei=D_EJU8GrCq3xiAe71IDoCw&psig=AFQjCNELORp18VXJYOy-JDTTaiKdbGH1Lg&ust=1393246802251263

A2: Origins and Course of the First

World War, 1905-1918 – Exam Questions

Paper 2, Section A topics are split into three questions. The wording and pattern of the questions will

always be the same so remember the three types of questions you have to deal with: a) Making

inferences from a source b) Cross-referencing and comparing sources c) Evaluating a historical claim.

Possible topics include:

You only have about 45 minutes max to answer all three sub-questions. The amount of marks for each

questions should help you judge how much to write. For Question a) give 5 minutes, Question b) 10

minutes, Question c) 30 minutes. Grade boundaries are at the end of document.

The Alliance System and International Rivalry, 1905-1914

The Alliance System before 1914 including the Triple Alliance and the formation of the Triple Entente.

Economic, Imperial and Military Causes of international rivalry.

The Stuggle for Control of the Balkans, 1905-1914

The key issues in the Balkans including the weaknesses of the Ottoman Empire, Balkan nationalism, Austro-

Serbian rivalry, The Bosnian Crisis, The Balkan War.

The Growth of Tension in Europe, 1905-1914

Anglo-German rivalry, the Naval Arms Race, The First and Second Moroccan Crises 1905-6 and 1911. The

Assassination at Sarajevo and the events leading to the outbreak of war.

The Schlieffen Plan and Deadlock on the Western Front

The Schlieffen Plan and why it failed, the trench system, life in the trenches, new weapons and methods,

reasons for deadlock, key features of the Somme and Passchendaele, successes and failures, Responsibility

of Haig.

The War at Sea and Gallipoli

German threat to Britain in North Sea, German Raids, Heligoland Bight, Dogger Bank, Battle of Jutland, The

U-Boat threat, the Lusitania, Anti U-boat measures, reasons for and key features of the Gallipoli Campaign,

Evacuation and effects of campaign.

The Defeat of Germany

US entry into war, Key features of the Ludendorff Spring Offensives 1918, The Allied drive to victory

(July-November 1918), Revolution in Germany and Reasons for German Defeat.

Question 1 – The Schlieffen Plan 1

This question is about the German invasion of Belgium and France using the Schlieffen Plan in 1914.

Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - A British cartoon showing the German attack on Belgium, August 1914. The

title of the cartoon is ‘Bravo Belgium’.

Source B

From an account of the Battle of Mons, August 1914, written by Walter Bloem, a

German soldier.

We had no sooner left the edge of the wood than a volley of bullets whistled past our noses

and cracked into the trees behind. Five or six cries near me, five or six of my grey

uniformed lads collapsed on the grass. Damn it, this was serious! Forward again at the

double. More firing, closer now and tearing into our ranks, more lads falling. From now on

matters went from bad to worse. We had to go back. It was a bad defeat, in our first

battle we had been beaten by the English.

Source C

From an account of the Battle of Mons, August 1914, by Corporal Holbrook of the British

Army.

You couldn’t see the earth for them [Germans] there were that many. Time after time our officers

gave the order ‘Rapid Fire’. Well, you didn’t wait for the order, really! You’d see a lot of them coming

in a mass on the other side of the canal and you just let them have it. They kept retreating, and then

coming forward, and then retreating again. Of course we were losing men and a lot of officers

especially when the Germans started this shrapnel shelling and, of course, they had machine-guns –

masses of them. But we kept flinging them back. I don’t know how many times we saw them off.

Source D

From a modern history textbook.

Von Kluck, the German commander, decided he could not swing around to the west of Paris, according

to the original plan, so he advanced straight towards it. While the Germans marched on foot, the

French diverted troops to Paris by rail, and then on to the front. The German army was weary and

overstretched. The French were fighting to save their country. The German advance was eventually

halted at the River Marne.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the German

invasion of Belgium in 1914. (3)

b) Study Sources B and C.

Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Battle of Mons? Explain

your answer. (7)

c) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.

‘The main reason for the failure of the Schleiffen Plan was the action of the French

army at the Battle of the Marne.’

Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this

view. (15)


This question is about the Schlieffen Plan of 1914. Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all

the questions that follow:

Source A - A painting by a British artist in August 1914 showing the Belgian defence of

Liege against the advancing German army.

Source B: From a diary of a German soldier who fought at the Battle of Mons, August 1914.

We had no sooner left the edge of the wood than a hail of bullets from the British whistled past

our noses. The 160 German troops that left the wood with me were now reduced to 100. From now

on matters went from bad to worse. Wherever I looked there were dead or wounded. We were

being driven back, badly beaten by the British – by the British we had laughed at a few hours

before.

Source C: From the diary of a British officer in the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) after

the Battle of Mons.

The battle showed that well-directed fire could mow the enemy down with very little risk to those

who were firing. The Germans must have suffered ten times as many casualties as us. The battle

also showed that the enemy had no plan of action and did not try to make use of cover. If they had

had a proper plan, they would have pushed us back in a quarter of the time they did.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the Belgian

defence of Liege. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Battle of Mons? Explain

your answer. (7)


‘The main reason for the failure of the Schleiffen Plan was the changes made by Von

Moltke.’


view. (15)

Source D: From a history of the First World War, published in 2007.

Von Moltke, the German commander, made crucial changes to the original plan. The German armies

that invaded Belgium were 100,000 soldiers fewer than Schlieffen’s original estimates because von

Moltke sent additional men to reinforce the Russian front. In addition, German armies were

supposed to encircle Paris. This part of the plan was abandoned in early September, leading to the

Battle of the Marne.


This question is about the First World War in 1914 after the failure of the Schlieffen Plan. This

period on the Western Front, between October-November 1914, is sometimes known as the ‘Race to

the Sea’. Study Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - A British drawing showing an attack by German troops on British trenches during

the First Battle of Ypres, October 1914.

Source B

From a modern textbook about the First World War.

In late-October 1914 the Germans tried to break through the British lines at Ypres.

The Germans had a considerable numerical advantage over the BEF's seven infantry divisions and

three cavalry divisions. For replacements, General French could only count on a few divisions of

Indian troops already en route as reinforcements. The Indian units would soon prove to be

outstanding fighters in both offence and defence.

The attacks began along a narrow front on 31 October when German cavalry drove a smaller British

cavalry unit from its position near the village of Messines. Shortly after, German forces engaged the

British further to the north, but a ferocious British counterattack repelled the Germans. Thanks to

superior British rifle fire, they were able to hold this sector. The British rifles were so fast and

deadly that the Germans mistakenly believed they were facing British machine guns.

http://www.firstworldwar.com/weaponry/machineguns.htm

Source C

Extract from a book written by a British soldier in 1917, ‘From Mons to Ypres with General

French’. Here he describes an attack by troops of an Indian unit on German positions in the

village of Messines during the First Battle of Ypres, October-November 1914.

The Sikhs charged magnificently. They got into the village, and the houses were the scenes of many a

hand-to-hand fight. One big Sikh brought back three prisoners.

But close-quarter fighting and individual conflicts in the buildings of the town scattered the Sikhs.

Soon the Germans brought a couple of machine-guns into play at the end of a street, mowing down the

big fellows in squads as they came within range. Their officers were down, save one or two. No

cohesive body could be formed to take the machine-guns, so back the Sikhs came, straggling and

demoralised, the effect of their splendid charge made ineffective by their inexperience of this kind

of warfare.

Source D

From the despatch by British Commander Sir John French on 20th November 1914. In it he was writing

to his superiors in Britain about the battles between the Battle of the Marne (September 1914) and the

First Battle of Ypres (October-November 1914). This period is sometimes known as the ‘Race to the

Sea’.

General Rawlinson informed me that large hostile forces were advancing upon him from the east and north-east,

and that his left flank was severely threatened. I was aware of the threats from that direction, but hoped that

at this particular time that these could be held off by the combined efforts of the French and British Cavalry,

and the Territorial troops supporting them. It was probably wise of Rawlinson not to launch a full attack by

British troops in their somewhat weakened condition; but the result was that the enemy's continued possession

of Menin (near Ypres) and its railway junction certainly aided the rapid reinforcement of German troops and

this meant any further British advance was impossible.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the Western

Front during 1914. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the difficulties soldiers faced in

achieving a breakthrough against enemy lines? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The main reason neither side was able to break through on the Western Front in October-

November 1914 was the rapid movement of troops to defend against an enemy attack.’

Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view.

(15)

Question 4 – Life in the Trenches

This question is about conditions and life in the trenches on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C

and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - Photograph of German soldiers in the trenches on the Western Front in 1916.

Source B

In May 1915 Winston Churchill resigned his post as First Lord of the Admiralty and in

November went as an army officer to France. On his second night in the trenches near Neuve

Chapelle he wrote to his wife.

Filth and rubbish everywhere; graves built into the defences with feet and clothing breaking through

the soil; water and muck on all sides. There is a non-stop sound of rifles and machine-guns, and

whining of bullets which pass overhead.

Source C

An extract from a diary kept by a civilian. The writer was helping in a hospital in Britain.

3rd August 1916. One patient was a Regular soldier before 1914. He served in Gallipoli as well as

France. He says that getting to the front-line trenches is a hundred times worse than being in them.

It means possibly an eight-mile walk through narrow trenches each man burdened with kit. In muddy

weather progress is difficult; he remembers mud waist deep. By the time the front-line trenches are

reached men are dead-tired.

Source D

From a modern British history book about the First World War.

A [British] soldier usually served in the trenches only for short periods. Of 20,000 men in a division,

only 2,000 were in the front line at any moment. A typical month would be: four days in the front

line, four in the support trenches, eight in reserve and the remainder in rest areas.

The section of the front where a soldier served was also important. Anywhere near Ypres was always

bad, but many other areas were very quiet.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about conditions for

soldiers in the trenches. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the experience for soldiers in

the trenches? Explain your answer. (7)


‘Life in the trenches was unpleasant rather than dangerous.’


view. (15)

Question 5 – Deadlock on the Western Front 1

This question is about the deadlock on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C and D and then

answer all the questions that follow:

Source A – An illustration from The Illustrated London News, 29th July 1916, with the title

‘The Surreys Play the Game.’

SOURCE B: A German soldier describes ‘going over the top’ during a German offensive

of April 1915.

At noon we went over the top. After less than a hundred metres we ran up against an almost

concrete wall of whistling and whining machine-gun bullets. My company commander had his

face shot away. A young boy cried for his mother, blood spurting from a wound in his face.

Whole rows of men on either side of me, in front and behind, fell, one after another. We

suffered horrific casualties. We had no chance.

SOURCE C: A German soldier’s account of the first day of the Somme, 1 July 1916.

Our machine guns were hurriedly placed in position. A series of extended lines of infantry

were seen moving forward from the British trenches. The British came on at a steady pace as

if expecting to find nothing alive in our front trenches. A few moments later, when the

leading British line was within a hundred metres, the rattle of our machine-gun fire broke

out. All along the line, sections seemed to fall. All along the line men could be seen throwing

up their arms and collapsing, never to move again.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the

Western Front during the First World War. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the attacks on the Western

Front? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The main reason for the deadlock on the Western Front was the tactics of the

commanders on both sides.’


view. (15)

SOURCE D: From a textbook on the First World War, published in 2007.

Both sides made attempts to break through between 1915 and 1917, without success. The

trench system, supported by the machine gun, was too strong. New weapons such as gas and

tanks failed to break the stalemate. However, the main reason for the deadlock was the

tactics of the Allied and German commanders who persisted for three years with the belief

that using large numbers of troops in an attack would succeed against machine guns and

trenches.

Question 6 – Deadlock on the Western Front 2

This question is about the deadlock on the Western Front. Study Source A, B, C and D and then

answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - A British painting showing an attack by British troops on German trenches at Neuve

Chapelle, March 1915.

Source B: From an account by a British soldier who fought on the Western Front. He is

describing a British attack on the German trenches on 1st July 1916, the first day of

the Somme.

The 1st Rifle Brigade advanced in perfect order. Everything was working smoothly, not a shot

being fired. We had nearly reached the German front line, when all at once machine-guns

opened up all along our front with a murderous fire. We were caught in the open, with no

shelter. Men were falling all around us. I tripped over dead bodies and fell headlong into a shell

hole. Bodies were strung out on the barbed wire.

Source C: From an interview with a British soldier who served on the Western Front. He

is describing a British attack during the Somme offensive.

Hundreds of dead were strung out on the barbed wire. Quite as many died on the enemy wire

as on the ground. It was clear that there was no gap in the wire at the time of the attack. The

Germans must have been reinforcing the wire for months. How did the planners imagine that

the British soldiers would survive the machine gun fire and the barbed wire?

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about fighting on the

Western Front during the First World War. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the failure of the British

attacks at the Somme in July 1916? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The main reason for the deadlock on the Western Front was the tactics of the

commanders on both sides.’


view. (15)

Source D: From a modern history textbook, published in 2005.

The commanders on both sides had little or no idea about trench warfare and the tactics

necessary to break the deadlock. Many of the senior British generals had very out-of-date

ideas. They still believed that the cavalry would win wars. They persisted for over three years

with the belief that numbers of infantry soldiers would achieve a breakthrough against

machine-guns and barbed wire.

Question 7 – The Use of Tanks

This question is about the use of tanks and the defeat of Germany. Study Source A, B, C and D and

then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - A British painting showing tanks being used during an Allied Offensive, Aug 1918.

Source B: From A Company of Tanks written in 1920 by a British tank commander. He is

describing the use of tanks during August 1918.

We had repeated the success of Cambrai, breaking through the German trenches and taking a

great number of German prisoners. The thick mist at dawn had protected the tanks, but it had

not been dense enough to seriously handicap the drivers. The advance, spearheaded by the

tanks, had been rapid, and only in one or two villages had the enemy shown any strong defence.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the use of tanks

on the Western Front in 1918. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the use of tanks on the

Western Front in 1918? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The main cause of the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the use of tanks.’


view. (15)

Source C: From an account written by a British commander in 1947. He is describing the

Western Front in 1918.

Tanks only really affected the morale of the British soldiers. From what I saw, it was clear

that the troops were pleased to see them. Tanks were some use for crushing enemy machine

gun posts and artillery. They were less effective in moving across enemy territory where there

were huge craters and damaged trenches.

Source D: From a textbook about the First World War, published in 1993.

By mid-1913, the Germans had several weaknesses. Their soldiers were exhausted after

Ludendorff’s failed offensives of March-June. The German war effort had been seriously

disrupted by the British naval blockade. On the other hand, the Allies had several advantages.

Their armies were being constantly reinforced by the arrival of fresh American troops. The

unified command under General Foch enabled the Allies to coordinate their attacks.

Question 8 – Gallipoli 1

This question is about the Allied attack against the Turks at Gallipoli in 1915. Study Source A, B, C


Source A - Painting, by Charles Dixon, of the landings by Australian troops at Anzac Cove on

the Gallipoli Peninsula, April 1915.

Source B

Extract from a letter home written by Captain Guy Dawnay, a British officer involved in the

Gallipoli campaign, April 1915.

The landing place was a difficult one. A narrow, sandy beach backed by a very high intricate mass of

hills, those behind the beach being exceedingly steep. The moment the boats landed the troops had

to rush forward for those hills, almost cliff-like, only 50 yards away. I went ashore there yesterday,

into their position, and it seemed almost incredible that any troops could have got up that hillside

fully armed and equipped.

Source C

Extract from the diary of Captain Aubery Herbert, a British officer attached to an Australian

unit in the landings of April 1915.

We landed on a narrow piece of land. There were lines of men clinging like cockroaches under the

cliffs. The only thing to do was to dig in, but a good many men were shot while trying to do this.

We slept on a ledge a few feet above the beach. Firing went on all night. In the morning it was very

cold, and we were all soaked. The Navy, it appeared, had landed us in the wrong place. This made the

Army very angry, though as things turned out it was the one bright spot. Had we landed anywhere

else, we would have been wiped out.

Source D

Extract from a modern book about the First World War, The Great War: Myth and Reality,

by D Marshall, written in 1988.

The [Gallipoli] expedition was plagued by inadequate resources. The question arose, if Britain lacked

the resources to conduct such a campaign, was it wise to attempt it in the first place?

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the landings on the

Gallipoli Peninsula. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the difficulties troops faced

when landing on the beaches of the Gallipoli Peninsula? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The Gallipoli Campaign failed because of chronically bad planning.’


view. (15)




Source A - Australian troops go ‘over-the-top’ in an attack on Turkish positions at Gallipoli.

Source B

From an account by a British officer who fought at Gallipoli.

The Turks had sited their trenches very cleverly on the higher ground and it was often useless to

attack one set before another had been taken. There were two difficulties: getting the attacks

underway at all, and then supporting them properly. The trenches became congested, the telephone

wires were cut by shrapnel and the whole show got out of control. The idea was always to go through

with a rush and to disregard losses. This tactic had no chance against determined defenders armed

with machine guns.

Source C

From a history textbook, published 2001.

British and ANZAC attacks failed to break through against strongly defended Turkish trenches and

machine guns which were sited on higher ground. For the Turks, this was a Holy War, a struggle to

drive out Christian invaders from Muslim Turkey. Time and again, the Turks charged downhill on the

Allies. Despite suffering very heavy casualties from machine-gun fire, the Turks continued their

charges.

Source D

From the memoirs of a British officer who fought at Gallipoli.

The major problem was that attacks were carried out by men who had been seriously weakened by

the conditions in the trenches. The dead bodies in no-man’s land attracted horrendous numbers of

flies which, in turn, contaminated our food. Typhoid and dysentery were rife. Those that didn’t get

either suffered other very unpleasant tummy troubles.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the nature of a

trench attack during the Gallipoli Campaign. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the attempts to break through

at Gallipoli? Explain your answer. (7)


‘Living conditions in the trenches were the main reason why the Gallipoli Campaign

failed.’


view. (15)




Source A - Allied troops come ashore during landings at ‘V Beach’ at Cape Helles during the

Gallipoli Campaign, April 1915.

Source B - An eyewitness, John Masefield, describes the landings at Suvla Bay, August 1915.

From every Turkish rifle and machine-gun began a murderous fire upon the ships and boats. Almost

all the shots hit their target. Many were killed in the water and many who were wounded were swept

away and drowned. Others, trying to swim in the fierce current, were drowned by the weight of their

equipment. But some reached the shore. These instantly rushed to try and cut the wire

entanglements, and were killed. Only a handful reached cover.

Source C - An Australian folk song of the First World War.

We sailed off to Gallipoli.

How well I remember the day

When the blood stained the sand and the water

And how in that hell that they called Suvla Bay

We were butchered like lambs to the slaughter.

Jonny Turk was ready,

He primed himself well,

He showered us with bullets and he rained us with shells

And in five minutes flat he’d blown us to hell

Nearly blew us back to Australia.

Source D – From a modern history book about Gallipoli.

There was a lack of up-to-date knowledge about Turkish troop positions. The instructions for the

campaign were vague. Kitchener had only a hazy idea of what was needed. General Hamilton was the

Allied Commander of Gallipoli. His only intelligence consisted of a 1912 manual on the Turkish army,

some old inaccurate maps, a tourist guide book and what little could be found out from the Turkish

desk at the Foreign Office.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about landings at

Gallipoli. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the landings at Suvla Bay in

August 1915? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The Gallipoli Campaign failed because of poor planning.’


view. (15)

Question 11 – Battle of the Somme

This question is about the first day of the Battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916. Study Source A, B, C


Source A - British soldiers advance across No-Man’s Land in the Battle of the Somme on 1st

July 1916. The dark strip is the forward trench of the British lines.

Source B

Account of the first hours of the battle from Sidney Appleyard, who was held in reserve as

part of the attack by the London Division on 1st July 1916. Appleyard wrote this shortly after

the battle.

By 8 o’clock all the smoke had cleared and it was risky to look over the parapet, for the Germans had

machine-guns fixed on these trenches. The first news to reach us was from the London Rifle Brigade

who reported that they had successfully moved through the first three German lines and had taken a

large number of prisoners. This sounded good but no news was received from our boys until 9.30 a.m.

when B Company sent word back that they had reached the Hun second line, but that other companies

were held up, the Germans putting up a stubborn resistance.

Source C

The account of Corporal W. H. Shaw of the British Army. Here he describes the attacks on

German lines on the first day of the Battle of the Somme.

Our artillery had been bombing that line for six days and nights, trying to smash the German barbed-

wire entanglements, but they hadn’t made any impact in clearing them. The result was we never got

anywhere near the Germans. Our lads were just mown down; they were simply slaughtered. It was

just one continuous advance, retreat, advance, retreat, losing men all the time and there we were,

wondering when it was going to end. You couldn’t do anything. You were either tied down by the

shelling or the machine-guns, and yet we kept at it, kept on going along the line, making no impact on

the Germans at all.

Source D

From a history of the First World War, published in 1989.

British security surrounding the Somme offensive was by no means perfect. Indeed the Germans

knew well in advance about the attack and were well-prepared. German defenders had regularly

practised rushing their machine-guns up from the dug-outs. This had been perfected to a three-

minute-drill.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the British attack

in the Battle of the Somme on 1st July 1916. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the British attacks on the first

day of the Battle of the Somme? Explain your answer. (7)


‘German preparations were the main reason for the British failure on the first day of

the Somme.’


view. (15)

Question 12 – Technological Developments

This question is about the use of technological developments in warfare on the Western Front. Study

Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - ‘Gassed’, a painting, by J S Sargent, of British troops at a Field Hospital on the

Western Front.

Source B - From a modern history textbook about the First World War.

Over the four years of war, each side developed an airforce that included armed fighters and

bombers. The rate of technological development in the air was the same on both sides. By 1918, the

British, French and Germans had developed bomber aircraft that could damage enemy cities and kill

civilians. But, although technological progress was rapid, the general effectiveness of aircraft

remained limited. They were not powerful enough to bring about a breakthrough in the war.

Source C - Maurice Baring worked at Flying Corps Headquarters during the First World War.

He later published his recollections in his book Flying Corps Headquarters: 1914-1918. Here is

an extract about the development in the use of aircraft during 1917.

The operations of this year [1917] confirmed the lessons of the past, but soon a new factor became

apparent. Fighting not only extended upwards, but downwards as well; low-flying machines with

wireless radio co-operated with ground troops, and attacked men, guns, trenches, transport, and

hostile aerodromes [airfields]. The Germans were a year behind in realising the value of wireless in

the air; but once they did realise they lost no time in adopting similar methods and applying them with

thoroughness and energy.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWbaring.htm

Source D

Extract from a book written by George Coppard, With a Machine Gun to Cambrai, a war memoir

written in 1969. Coppard served in the British Army in the Machine Gun Corps, having

volunteered in August 1914. Here he writes about the first day of the attack on the German

lines in the Battle of Cambrai in November 1917.

At 6.30 am on 20th November we heard the sound of tank engines warming up. The first glimpse of

dawn was beginning to show as we stood waiting for the big bang [artillery bombardment] that would

erupt behind us at the end of the count down. The tanks, looking like giant toads, became visible

against the skyline as they approached the top of the slope. Some of the leading tanks carried huge

bundles of tightly-bound brushwood, which they dropped when a wide trench was encountered, thus

providing a firm base to cross over. It was broad daylight as we crossed No Man's Land and the

German front line. I saw very few wounded coming back, and only a handful of prisoners. The tanks

appeared to have busted through any resistance. The enemy wire had been dragged about like old

curtains.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the impact of the

use of gas in the First World War. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the use of aircraft in the war?

Explain your answer. (7)


‘Technological developments did little to break the stalemate on the Western Front.’


view. (15)

Question 13 – The Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele)

This question is about the Third Battle of Ypres (sometimes known as Passchendaele) in 1917. Study

Source A, B, C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - British troops manning a position on the battlefield in the Third Battle of Ypres,

October 1917.

Source B

General William Birdwood wrote this, about the Third Battle of Ypres, after the war. He was

a British Corps Commander on the Western Front and had many divisions of Australian troops

under his command.

My men were weak and tired and when I was asked [in a meeting of senior commanders in October

1917] I had to advise against any further attacks. However, since only one division of my Corps was

to be involved in the next stage of the attack, and since the other Corps Commanders were in favour

of pushing on, Haig decided to do so.

There is little doubt that if the weather had held, and if we had been able to prepare and rehearse

our advance as carefully as in the early stages of the attack, we should have been able to take

Passchendaele. But the weather defeated us. In that deep, clinging mud neither men nor animals

could progress.

Source C

From a letter, dated 19th October 1917, written by a soldier in the British Army, Private

Leonard Hart, a New Zealander fighting in the Third Battle of Ypres.

I have just decided to have this letter posted by someone going on leave to England, so I will tell you

a few more facts which it would not have been advisable to mention otherwise.

Some terrible blunder has been made. Someone is responsible for the barbed-wire not having been

broken up by our artillery. Someone is responsible for the opening of our own artillery barrage in the

middle of us troops instead of 150 yards ahead of us. Someone is responsible for those [German]

machine-gun emplacements being left practically intact, but the newspapers will all report another

glorious success, and no one except those who actually took part in it will know any different.

Source D

From a modern book, Battles of the First World War, by Martin Evans.

The likely total figures for casualties [in the Battle of Ypres] are 244,900 British (including soldiers

from the Empire), 8,500 French and approximately 230,000 German. The whole battle has been

condemned by some as futile. Perhaps a more accurate criticism might be that it was an error to

continue the attack after September 1917 when it became clearer that conditions were not favouring

the Allies. It appears, rightly or wrongly, that Haig was genuinely convinced that the Germans were

on the point of breaking by the end of September and therefore he should continue the assault. It is

also the case that the Germans themselves viewed their losses as a calamity. By now the Allies could

look to America to add to its manpower; by contrast the Germans had no further reserves to call

upon.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the conditions on

the battlefield during the Third Battle of Ypres. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the reasons for the problems

the British faced in the Passchendaele offensive? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) was simply a failure for the British.’


view. (15)

Question 14 – Douglas Haig

This question is about the leadership of Douglas Haig during the First World War. Study Source A, B,

C and D and then answer all the questions that follow:

Source A - A 1918 cartoon from the British magazine, Punch entitled ‘The Conquering Hero’

showing Douglas Haig and British troops.

Source B

A comment about Douglas Haig by Fred Pearson, an ordinary soldier in the British army during

the First World War, reported in a newspaper in 1996.

The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig. I'm very bitter; always have been and always will be and

everybody else that knew him. He lived almost 50 kilometres behind the line and that's about as near

as he got. I don't think he knew what a trench was like. And they made him an Earl and gave him

£100,000. I know what I'd have given him.

Source C

David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister during the First World War, writing in his memoirs,

1935.

Haig was a second-rate Commander in unparalleled and unforeseen circumstances. He was not

endowed with any of the elements of imagination and vision ... And he certainly had none of that

personal magnetism which has enabled great leaders of men to inspire multitudes with courage, faith

and a spirit of sacrifice ... He was incapable of planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded on so

immense a battlefield.

Source D

From a modern book about the First World War by John Terraine.

The simple reason why the British Army had such heavy casualties between 1914-1918 was that it was

doing far more fighting, against a very powerful foe, than it has ever done before or since. It would,

in fact, have been a mistake if the British army had not had very heavy casualties in carrying out that

task.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about Douglas Haig.

(3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the Douglas Haig’s leadership

of the British Army? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The main reason for the high casualties in the British Army during the war was due to

the nature of the fighting.’


view. (15)

Question 15 – The War at Sea

This question is about the War at Sea during the First World War. Study Source A, B, C and D and


Source A - Painting of a British ship being sunk by a German submarine in 1914. The crew of

the British ship are in the rowing boat.

Source B

A civilian in Britain recorded news of the Battle of Jutland in a diary entry dated 3rd June

1916.

We have had the greatest shock since the start of the war. On opening our newspapers we read that

some of our finest ships have been sunk and that thousands of our brave seamen have been lost. All

the facts are not known yet, but what we are told is bad enough.

Source C - From the Daily Mirror’s front page, 3rd June 1916, reporting on the Battle of Jutland:

Greatest naval battle in history in North Sea

British lose three battlecruisers, three cruisers and eight torpedo-boat destroyers.

Two German dreadnoughts sunk - Enemy battle cruiser blown up, another disabled and third seriously damaged.

Enemy cruiser and six destroyers sunk - Our losses include Queen Mary, Indefatigable, Invincible, Defence

and Black Prince, and Warrior abandoned.

Friday 7pm, The Secretary of the Admiralty makes the following announcement: On the afternoon of

Wednesday, May 31st, a naval engagement took place off the coast of Jutland. The British ships on which the

brunt of the fighting fell were the battlecruiser fleet and some cruisers and light cruisers, supported by four

fast battleships. Among these the losses were heavy.

The German battle fleet, aided by a low visibility, avoided prolonged action with our main forces, and soon after

these appeared on the scene the enemy returned to port, though not before receiving severe damage from our

battleships.

The enemy's losses were serious. At least one battle cruiser was destroyed and one severely damaged; one

battleship reported sunk by our destroyers during a night attack; two light cruisers were disabled and probably

sunk. The exact number of enemy destroyers disposed of during the action cannot be ascertained with any

certainty, but it must have been large.

Source D

From a modern book on the First World War.

By the end of 1914 the British navy had won control on the surface of the North Sea forcing the Germans to

adopt a strategy of submarine warfare. With the Germans increasingly forced to keep their surface fleet in

harbour the British tightened the blockade. The Battle of Jutland, while not a decisive clash, produced

decisive confirmation that the British controlled the surface once the Germans were forced back into their

ports. But the threat of the U-boats was always present and it took major work, particularly in 1917, to reduce

the threat. The arrival of the USA into the war and the introduction of the convoy system were two major

elements in this respect.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about how German submarines

operated in the early stages of the First World War.

(3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the outcome of the Battle of Jutland?



‘The main reason the British were successfully able to defeat the threat posed by the German

navy throughout the First World War was the outcome of the Battle of Jutland.’

Use all the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view.

(15)

Question 16 – The War at Sea 2

This question is about the War at Sea during the First World War. Study Source A, B, C and D and


Source A - Poster showing the sinking of the passenger liner the Lusitania, May 1915.

Source B

From the Secretary to the Admiralty following the German raids on British east coast towns

such as Scarborough and Hartlepool in December 1914.

These coastal raids are militarily insignificant... They may cause some loss among the civil population,

and some damage to private property, which is to be regretted, but they must not in any

circumstances be allowed to modify the general Naval policy which is being pursued.

Source C

Article from the local newspaper, the ‘Scarborough Mercury’, following the German

bombardment of the town in December 1914.

The Germans must pay and every penny. We are assured by the Allies that the war will not terminate

until the Germans are on their knees and prepared to accept the terms decided upon by the Allies.

In undertaking this brutal act the Germans have disregarded the rules of war. The German ships

came out of port for the distinct purpose of firing upon the town, and those responsible were fully

aware that the carrying out of this act would result in the wanton destruction of property and

ruthless sacrifice of life. All children of those who have been killed must be provided for, and those

maimed must be cared for during the remainder of their days.

Source D

From a modern textbook on the First World War.

The Allies were able to win the all-important economic war by imposing the naval blockade on

Germany. The British and French had access to supplies in America (the USA only entered the war in

1917) and the neutral countries. The Germans did not. This had a major impact on the German

economy as raw material and food shortages grew as the war dragged on. British naval blockade as

early as 1915 had reduced German imports by 55 percent from pre-war levels. The result was critical

shortages throughout German industry. Germany began to run short of many important raw materials

needed to produce munitions and arms as well as the economy as a whole. Food for the population was

only part of the problem. There were shortages in coal (at the time a vital industrial fuel). There

were also shortages of various non-ferrous metals. The blockade also sharply reduced fertilizer

which was needed to maintain agriculture production. By 1917 there was wide-spread hunger in

Germany. Some sources suggest up to 500,000 German civilians may have died from malnutrition.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the sinking of the

Lusitania. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the effects of the German

bombardment of British coastal towns in 1914? Explain your answer. (7)


‘The most significant aspect of the war at sea was the German U-boat campaign.’


view. (15)

Question 17 – Allied Drive to Victory

This question is about the final stage of the war, in 1918, and the Allied victory against Germany.


Source A - A photograph of British troops moving forward to the front line (near the St.

Quentin Canal) as part of the September 1918 offensive against the German defences of the

Hindenburg Line.

Source B

A British infantry soldier speaking in 1996, recalling his experiences of the Allied attack on the

Hindenburg Line.

[The Hindenburg Line] was very strongly fortified with barbed-wire, trenches, pill-boxes and

everything. I don’t think the Germans ever thought we’d break through. But by that time we had a

tremendous amount of artillery and gunfire.

We broke through quite easily, as far as I was concerned. We followed the barrage and were over –

we never got any fire in return. It was the big breakthrough. Morale was high and we could see we

were going to win.

Source C

Extract from a book written by German General Ludendorff, called My War Memories, written

in 1920.

8th August 1918 was the black day of the German Army in this war. Early on 8th August, the English

and the French attacked with strong squadrons of tanks. The [German] divisions in the line at that

point allowed themselves to be completely overwhelmed. The situation was very serious. The report

I received worried me deeply. I was told of valiant deeds, but also of behaviour which, I openly

confess, I would not have thought possible in the German Army; whole units of our men had

surrendered to small groups of enemy soldiers. The officers in many places had lost their influence.

Source D

Extract from a modern History textbook about the First World War.

In March 1918, Germany finally defeated Russia in the East. The Germans then took a final gamble to

break the deadlock on the Western Front and win the war. The great German Spring Offensive

began on 21 March and pushed the Allies back many miles, but after four months it had run out of

steam, and the Germans had suffered 1.5 million casualties in the process. By August 1918 the Allies

were able to launch their own offensive which was strikingly successful.

The Germans were now also suffering back home. In October, food shortages and low morale led to

strikes and protests in German cities. Communists stirred up ill-feeling in the hope of starting a

Russian-style revolution. On 29 October, German sailors mutinied at Kiel and refused to take their

ships out to fight the British.

Questions

a) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the British Army

in 1918. (3)


Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the success of Allied tactics?



‘The main reason the Germans suffered defeat in 1918 was the collapse in morale of

their troops.’


view. (15)

Question 18 – Allied Drive to Victory

This question is about the final stage of the war, in 1918, and the Allied victory against Germany.


Source A - A photograph of German prisoners escorted by Allied troops, 1918.

Source B

From an account, written shortly after the battle, of the recapture of the town of Albert by

the British army in August 1918.

The attack went forward with tanks, under cover of a creeping barrage which played havoc among the

German’s carefully sited machine guns, placed in pairs and in depth along the whole front. Eighty such

guns were captured by 54 Brigade, and many more destroyed by shell-fire. Although the advance was

achieved the Germans still put up some stiff resistance.

Source C

Extract from the memoirs of a British soldier, who served on the Western Front in 1918,

published in 1993

At first the German spring offensive of 1918 worked because it took us by surprise and pushed us

back, but they just couldn’t get through our lines. Our attacks in August were much more effective

and were able to achieve a breakthrough. When the Germans retreated, they didn’t have time to get

back into their trenches. We had them on the run, as it were. The German prisoners were exhausted

and had the look of defeat on their faces.

Source D

Extract from a history of the First World War, published in 1992

In 1918 Germany was weakened by the surrender of its allies – Austria, Turkey and Bulgaria – and the

failure of the Ludendorff spring offensives. Moreover, the Allied blockade brought serious food

shortages and suffering for the German civilians. However, the main reason for German defeat was

the arrival of US troops. There were 1.7 million in Europe by the end of the war and they played an

important part in the Allied Offensives of July-October 1918.

Questions

d) Study Source A.

Give three statements that could be inferred from Source A about the Germany Army

in 1918. (3)

e) Study Sources B and C.

Does Source C support the evidence of Source B about the British attacks on the

German Army in 1918? Explain your answer. (7)

f) Study Sources A, B, C and D, and use your own knowledge.

‘The main reason for the defeat of Germany in 1918 was the arrival of US troops.’


view. (15)

Paper 2, Section A - Mark Scheme

(a) Target: Source comprehension, inference and inference support (AO2) - 3 marks

Descriptor Mark

No rewardable material 0

One unsupported inference 1 mark

Two unsupported inferences 2 marks

Three or more unsupported inferences OR One or more supported inferences 3 marks

(b) Target: Corroboration by cross-referencing of sources (AO2) – 7 marks

Level Descriptor Mark

Level 1 Simple statements which identify support/differences at face value

1 mark – summarises or paraphrases the sources 2 marks for generalised comparisons.

1-2

Level 2 Developed statements identifying support OR challenge based on source contents 3-5

Level 3 Developed statements identifying support AND challenge based on source contents

AND extent of support 6-7

(c) Target: Making a judgement about an interpretation, relating analysis of sources to own knowledge (A01, 2, 3) –

15 marks

Level Descriptor Mark

Level 1

Simple statements, based on sources and/or own knowledge – Answers will often make generalised comments with little or no focus on the question.

1-2 marks for answers which summarise or copy sources.

3-4 marks for answers which attempt to answer the question using sources or own knowledge.

1-4

Level 2

Developed statements offering evidence for and/or against the view and is supported with details from the sources

5-6 marks for using sources/own knowledge only

7-8 marks for using the sources and own knowledge

5-8

Level 3

Developed explanation offering support for and/or against the view and is supported by precisely selected details from the sources

9-10 marks for using sources/own knowledge only

11-12 marks for using the sources and own knowledge

9-12

Level 4

Sustained argument, explicitly focused on the question, which reviews alternative views before giving a balanced judgement. The answer is supported

by precisely selected details from sources and own knowledge.

13-14 marks for explicit judgement on one factor. 15 marks for explicit judgement comparing the relative importance of a number

of factors.

13-15

Grade Boundaries for June 2012

Please use these grade boundaries only as a rough estimate of working at grade.

Boundaries are subject to change by Edexcel. If you are working at Level 2

then that is equivalent to a C. If you are achieving high level 3 consistently, you

are working at A/A* level.

Grade Total Marks from Exam Average Marks

Needed per Topic

A* 78 19.5

A 68 17

B 58 14.5

C 48 12

D 38 9.5

E 29 7.25

F 20 5

G 11 2.75

U 0+ 0+

Documents

EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, …worldofhistory.weebly.com/uploads/6/0/0/1/6001052/first_world_war... · EDEXCEL IGCSE History Revision Checklist: Paper 2, Section