Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2018 UNC SystemEmployee Engagement
Survey Results
UNC System Strategic Plan – Human Capital
GoalThe University will systematically focus on recruitment, retention, and development of the most talented and diverse workforce possible at all levels over the next five years.
Metric Create an implementation plan (including the details of proposed data collection and metrics) to systematically measure — at all levels — engagement, retention, succession planning, and investment in professional development in order to promote System‐wide improvements in these areas.
Background
January/February 2018All permanent UNC full‐time employees invited to participate in Engagement Survey administered by ModernThink (Creators of “Great Colleges to Work For”)
Five Year Project by UNC System to help achieve goals of the UNC Strategic Plan
Summer/Fall 2018Institutions received initial reports from ModernThinkModernThink conducted workshops and consultations with engagement steering committee members from each institution and the UNC System Office
Background
Three Survey CyclesFirst ‐ 2018Second ‐ 2020 Third ‐ 2022
2018 ‐ Setting the BaselineEstablish targeted goals for incremental improvement in 2020 ‐ 2022Determine relationships to other HR metrics
New TerritoryBenchmarks compare individual higher ed institutions, not university systems
Background
Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agreenor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Survey Elements:60 Belief Statements17 Benefits Statements1 Multi‐Select Question2 Open‐Ended Questions10 Demographics Questions
Rating Scale:
Positive ScorePercent of employees selecting Strongly Agree or Agree for a survey item
15 Core Dimensions
Job Satisfaction/Support Policies, Resources & Efficiency
Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations
Teaching Environment Shared Governance Communication
Professional Development Pride Collaboration
Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance
Supervisors/Department Chairs Fairness
Facilities Senior Leadership Respect & Appreciation
Response Guidelines
Response Options: Strongly Agree, Agree, Sometimes Agree/Sometimes Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, Not Applicable
Positive ResponsesStrongly Agree, Agree
Negative ResponsesStrongly Disagree, Disagree
Guideline Score Description Guideline Score75% + Very Good to Excellent < 10%
65 – 74% Good 10 – 14%
55 – 64% Fair to Mediocre 15 – 19%
45 – 54% Warrants Attention 20 – 29%
< 45% Poor 30% +
Response Rates
Job Category Total Responded Percentage
ALL Employees 333 197 59%
SAAO TIER 1 6 2 33%
SAAO TIER 2 28 19 68%
SHRA EXEMPT 23 17 74%
EHRA IRPS 42 27 64%
SHRA NON-EXEMPT 131 76 58%
FACULTY 103 56 54%
Job Category (Overall % Positive 1-60)
42%
44%
46%
49%
52%
SAAO Tier 2 (n=19)
EHRA IRPS (n=27)
Faculty (n=56)
SHRA Exempt (n=17)
SHRA Non-exempt (n=76)
Dimensions
67% 64% 61% 58% 55%
76%67%
72% 73% 70%
Pride Professional Development Supervisors/DepartmentChairs
Job Satisfaction/Support Facilities
2018 ECSU Overall 2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
Dimensions
50% 47% 46% 45% 43%
62% 65%56% 57% 58%
Compensation, Benefits &Work/Life Balance
Teaching Environment Fairness Collaboration Respect & Appreciation
2018 ECSU Overall 2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
Dimensions
42% 41% 38% 36%30%
59%54% 56% 56% 58%
Policies, Resources &Efficiency
Communication Shared Governance Faculty, Administration &Staff Relations
Senior Leadership
2018 ECSU Overall 2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
Strengths
• Job Fit, Autonomy & Connection to Mission
• Professional Development
• Supervisor/Department Chair Competencies
Job Fit, Autonomy & Connection to Mission
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
1 My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. 70 11 77 6
2 I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. 66 13 82 5
47My supervisor/department chair supports my efforts to balance my work and personal life.
68 13 80 7
5 I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. 92 2 90 2
36 I am proud to be part of this institution. 70 7 80 4
Professional Development
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
6 I am given the opportunity to develop my skills at this institution. 58 20 71 10
10 I understand the necessary requirements to advance my career. 69 15 63 15
7I receive feedback from my supervisor/department chair that helps me.
61 15 67 13
Supervisor/Department Chair Competencies
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
24 I have a good relationship with my supervisor/department chair. 72 8 82 6
3 My supervisor/department chair makes his/her expectations clear. 65 16 72 10
15 My supervisor/department chair regularly models this institution's values. 59 20 74 9
19 My supervisor/department chair is consistent and fair. 58 19 69 12
20 My supervisor/department chair actively solicits my suggestions and ideas. 59 16 67 13
Opportunities (Improvement Areas)
• Resource Constraints
• Performance Management/Accountability
• Respect & Appreciation
• Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
• Communication & Collaboration
• Shared Governance
• Senior Leadership
Resource Constraints
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
4 I am provided the resources I need to be effective in my job. 39 26 60 13
28 My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. 23 54 38 36
31 The facilities (e.g., classrooms, offices, laboratories) adequately meet my needs. 39 27 60 15
11 I am paid fairly for my work. 26 54 39 37
Performance Management/Accountability
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
17 Our review process accurately measures my job performance. 47 26 52 21
30Our orientation program prepares new faculty, administration and staff to be effective.
37 28 54 17
18 Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. 51 23 47 24
16 Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. 39 37 49 25
Respect & Appreciation
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
9 I am regularly recognized for my contributions. 40 27 53 20
35 Our recognition and awards programs are meaningful to me. 34 34 39 29
52We celebrate significant milestones and important accomplishments at this institution.
46 17 68 8
37Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of faculty, administration and staff.
29 44 54 18
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
50This institution places sufficient emphasis on having diverse faculty, administration and staff.
59 12 70 10
45At this institution, people are supportive of their colleagues regardless of their heritage or background.
53 21 73 8
54 This institution has clear and effective procedures for dealing with discrimination. 58 18 70 10
Communication & Collaboration
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
8 When I offer a new idea, I believe it will be fully considered. 51 20 61 14
21In my department, we communicate openly about issues that impact each other's work.
53 21 60 15
22 Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. 32 36 45 22
43 At this institution, we discuss and debate issues respectfully to get better results. 27 40 50 16
Communication & Collaboration
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
13 We have opportunities to contribute to important decisions in my department. 52 19 60 15
23 People in my department work well together. 59 11 66 9
26 I can count on people to cooperate across departments. 44 18 54 12
58 There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. 25 46 47 21
Shared Governance
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
38 The role of faculty in shared governance is clearly stated and publicized. 39 36 57 15
39Faculty are appropriately involved in decisions related to the education program (e.g., curriculum development, evaluation).
48 26 66 10
42Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning.
26 37 44 20
46Faculty, administration and staff work together to ensure the success of institution programs and initiatives.
41 20 64 8
55 There is regular and open communication among faculty, administration and staff. 30 33 48 18
Senior Leadership
Survey Statement2018 ECSU
Overall % Positive
2018 ECSU
Overall % Negative
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Positive
2018 UNC Core Population Aggregate
% Negative
27 Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institution's future. 32 33 55 17
41 Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. 24 42 52 17
32Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for institutional success.
33 36 67 10
48 Senior leadership regularly models this institution's values. 34 34 66 10
56 I believe what I am told by senior leadership. 25 36 56 15
Participation Rates and Positive Engagement Ratings with Benchmarks
Institution ParticipationUNC Charlotte 71 %
NCSSM 67 %UNCSA 65 %FSU 60 %
UNC Asheville 60 %ECSU 59 %
System Office 58 %UNC Wilmington 58 %
WCU 55 %WSSU 55 %
Appalachian 54 %NC State 54 %
UNC Greensboro 54 %NCCU 52 %
UNC Pembroke 52 %N.C. A&T 50 %
ECU 38 %UNC‐CH 37 %
Voluntary Turnover Rate and Positive Engagement Ratings
This shows the institution overall positive engagement scores compared to voluntary turnover rates for each institution for FY 17‐18. The 7.5% median turnover rate is derived from CUPA‐HR 2017 turnover data for four‐year public institutions that are in the same Carnegie classifications as the UNC institutions.
Survey Dimensions by Institution
Next Steps
• Share Survey Results• Available on HR Webpage under
“Employee Engagement Survey”• Deploy Suggestions Survey
• Encourage Employees to Provide Suggestions on How to Improve Campus Climate
• Compile Results • Provide Results to Cabinet/Employees• Identify Suggestions for Possible
Implementation
Sharing Survey Results
Questions