14
Economics 375 Economic Growth Exam Fall 2001 Professor Kenneth Ng California State University, Northridge

Economics 375

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Economics 375. Economic Growth Exam Fall 2001 Professor Kenneth Ng California State University, Northridge. Problem 1. Use the graph entitled the “Progress of the Human Race” on the next page where appropriate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Economics 375

Economics 375

Economic Growth Exam

Fall 2001

Professor Kenneth Ng

California State University, Northridge

Page 2: Economics 375

Problem 1 Use the graph entitled the “Progress of the Human Race” on the next page where

appropriate. According to Cippolla what are the three stages of human history? What distinguishes these

three stages? Hunter Gather, Agricultural, Industrial. They are distinguished by the sources of energy used. In the HG

stage, human muscle power was paramount. In the Agricultural stage, animals, the Ox and horse, were domesticated. In the Industrial stage, inanimate converters were utilized.

On the graph indicate the approximate dates during which the human race was in each stage. Hunter Gatherer-pre-10,000BC, Agricultural-to 1750, Industrial 1750 to present.

On the graph, draw lines representing the energy available to the average person. Label the corresponding values on the vertical axis.

Hunter Gatherer-4,000 cal. Agricultural-10,000. On the graph draw lines representing the life expectancy at birth of the average person. Label

the corresponding values on the vertical axis. Hunter Gatherer-20 yrs. Agricultural-40 yrs., Industrial-70+ years

On the graph, draw lines representing human population. Label the corresponding values on the vertical axis.

On the graph, draw lines representing per capita income during each period. Label the corresponding values on the vertical axis.

Where does the U.S. fit into Cippolla version of human history? Explain and indicate on your graph.

Can Cippolla explain the rise of culture, religion, and art? Explain. Consider the article by Thomas Sowell. Comment, criticize, and discuss in light of what you

have learned in this class and your answer to 1-8 above.

Page 3: Economics 375
Page 4: Economics 375
Page 5: Economics 375
Page 6: Economics 375
Page 7: Economics 375

Question 1 (continued) Where does the U.S. fit into Cippolla version of human

history? Explain and indicate on your graph. The U.S. only appeared at the tail end of human history.

Mankind’s condition had been improving steadily since the beginning of the Agricultural Period.

Can Cippolla explain the rise of culture, religion, and art? Explain.

In the Hunter Gatherer stage, providing the basics, food, clothing, and shelter, required all of a person’s time and energy. There was nothing left for anything else. Only during the Agricultural Period was there a social surplus which could be devoted to anything besides mere subsistence.

Consider the article by Thomas Sowell. Comment, criticize, and discuss in light of what you have learned in this class and your answer to 1-8 above.

Sowell is correct. Population growth has never been a precluder of economic growth. In fact, increases in population density have always accompanied an increase in the standard of living.

Page 8: Economics 375

Problem 2

Suppose you had census returns for 1800 and 1860. The returns provided the following information. From local newspapers you know that labor was paid $50 per year in 1800 and $100 per year in 1860 and that farmland could be rented for $25 per acre in 1800 and $75 per acre in 1860.

How much did GNP increase from 1800 to 1860? Show your calculations.

Construct an index of the amount of inputs being used in 1800 and 1860. How much did the supply of inputs increase from 1800 to 1860? Show your calculations.

How much of the increase in output from 1840 to 1860 is due to increased inputs and how much to improvements in productivity? Show your calculations.

1800 1860

Acres under cultivation

100 200

Labor 200 800

Bushels of wheat produced

4000 20000

Page 9: Economics 375

Problem 2

Index of Factors 176.67 624.24

Factor Share of Land (average of factor share

in year 1 and year 2)0.179 a

Factor Share of Labor (average of factor share

in year 1 and year 2)0.821 b

Percent Change in Output 660%

Percent Change in Land 100%

Percent Change in Labor 300%

Change in Total Factor Productivity 396%

I R La b

C *

R*

L*

F C aR bL* * * *

  1800 1860

Output $12,500 $95,000

Amount of Land 100 200

Amount of Labor 200 800

Price of Land $25 $75

Price of Labor $50 $100

Factor Share of Land 0.200 0.158

Factor Share of Labor 0.800 0.842

GNP increased from $12,500 to $95,000-a 660% increase.

Page 10: Economics 375

Problem 3 Consider the following formula was used by Paul David. What does the variable V stand for? Why was Paul David interested

in computing V? What historical questions was he trying to address? Why are these questions germane?

What assumption did Paul David have to make to compute V? Discuss.

After computing V, what was Paul David able to show? What relevance does this have for the present?

Read the following two articles. Comment and analyze in light of Paul David’s research.

naaa PSPSrV )1(

Page 11: Economics 375

What does the variable V stand for? Why was Paul David interested in computing V? What historical questions was he trying to address? Why are these questions germane?

V stands for per capita income. David was interested in computing V because he was interested in

the economic growth and it’s causes before 1840. This is a crucial period to understand because it is the period when

the U.S. increased per capita income from $500 to $1000 per capita.

How the U.S. accomplished this is germane because a larger proportion of the current world population have per capita incomes below or around $500.

Understanding the causes of per capita income growth in this range is also important if the U.S. uses tax money to assist poor countries to develop. How exactly should this money be spent for maximum effect?

Page 12: Economics 375

What assumption did Paul David have to make to compute V? Discuss. After computing V, what was Paul David able to show? What relevance does this have for the present?

David assumed that the ratio of per worker output in the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors (Z) remained constant from 1800 to 1860.

This was done because the census does not contain sufficient information to compute non-agricultural output (Pn) before 1840. This assumption is unlikely to cause a large error in computing V because only a small portion of the population was engaged in non-agriculture in 1800.

David was able to show: No take-off. Productivity improvements in agriculture were responsible for most of

the income growth during the period. Sectoral shifts and demographic changes were minor contributors.

David’s results provide insight into how poor countries today could increase per capita output.

Page 13: Economics 375

The Curve.Without Homework

54.5

21.9

21

21

Students Taking Exam

Students Enrolled in Class

Mean

Standard Deviation

Grade Required Score Normalized Score

Number Receiving

Grade

Percent Receiving

Grade

A 70 0.75 5 24%

B 49 -0.25 5 24%

C 32 -1 9 43%

D 10 -2 2 10%

F 0 0%

Page 14: Economics 375

Questions about exam?

ONE WEEK MANDATORY COOLING OFF PERIOD.

No questions answered about exam until next Tuesday.