27
Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson Green Design Carnegie Mellon University

Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

  • View
    216

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing

and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States

H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Green Design

Carnegie Mellon University

Page 2: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Growth of Retail E-commerce ($)Growth of Retail E-commerce ($)

• US DOC began measuring and reporting retail e-commerce in March 2000– 4Q 02 = $14.3 Billion– 1.6% of all retail purchases [$46B for 2002]– Uses same sampling as traditional surveys

• 12,000 out of 2 million firms (dangerous now?)

– Note the following are not considered retail (and thus also not counted in e-commerce $)

• Travel, financial, ticket brokering

Page 3: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

E-Commerce Retail Quarterly E-Commerce Retail Quarterly Volume ($B)Volume ($B)

Page 4: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Traditional Retail Logistics Traditional Retail Logistics SystemSystem

• Factory to warehouse to warehouse to retailer.

• Last leg of trip by private vehicle

Page 5: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Single Facility SalesSingle Facility Sales

• LL Bean, Lands End - catalogue sales

• Amazon (original), MusicOutpost - web based sales from a single facility

Page 6: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

www.eiolca.netwww.eiolca.net• Free life cycle assessment software on the web

from Carnegie Mellon - public data• >20,000 uses this year• economic, environment and resource

requirements for purchases from any sector– just added injury and fatality data

• based on linear model of economy and 500 sectors!

Page 7: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

EIO-LCA ImplementationEIO-LCA Implementation

• Use the 480*480 commodity input-output matrix of the U.S. economy (1997)

• Augment with sector-level environmental impact coefficient matrices (R) (average impact per dollar of output)

• Linear environmental impact calculation:

E = R[I - D]-1F

Page 8: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Comparison of Freight Modes

0

10

20

Total Energy (TJ/$1M) Direct Energy(TJ/$1M)

Total Energy (MJ/ton-mile)

Direct Energy (MJ/ton-mile)

Air

Truck

Rail

Page 9: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Book Publishing Case StudyBook Publishing Case Study

• Traditional System:– logistics: printer > warehouse > warehouse >

retailer > home, all by truck/car– unsold returns - roughly 35% for bestsellers

• E-commerce System:– logistics: printer > warehouse > distribution

center >home, by air and truck.– No unsold returns

Page 10: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Comparative AnalysisComparative Analysis

• Traditional:– truck transport (1000 mi)

– warehousing

– production of returns

– reverse travel of returns

– private automobile transport

• E-Commerce– air transport (500 mi)

– truck transport (500 mi)

– warehousing

Page 11: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Comparative Costs ($ 1000s for Comparative Costs ($ 1000s for $ 1 M or 290,000 books)$ 1 M or 290,000 books)

Traditional E-Commerce

W/o Returns or Auto

700 992

W Returns but w/o Auto

1,300 992

W/o Returns but w/ Auto

1,170 992

W returns and auto

1,780 992

Page 12: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Why are E-Commerce Costs Why are E-Commerce Costs Lower?Lower?

• Higher transportation costs for e-commerce, but:– Returns of unsold copies – Lower retail transactions costs– Lower (private) automobile cost

• Result is cost advantage for e-Commerce

Page 13: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Energy(TJ)

*ConventionalAir Pollutants

(mT)

RCRAHazardousWaste (mT)

GreenhouseGas Emissions(CO2 Equiv.,

mT)

Trucking (with returns) 5.3 8.9 9.1 354

Production 9.45 8.1 23 612Packaging 1.2 1.1 3.5 84Passenger Trips 9.7 42 0 611Pass. Fuel Prod. 7 1.7 30 337Total 33 62 66 2000

Trucking 1.2 2 2 80Air 7 3 9 440Production 7 6 17 453Packaging 4 3 11 254Delivery Trips 11 18.5 19 736Pass. Fuel Prod. 0 0 0 0Total 30 33 58 1963% Difference 9 47 12 2

Page 14: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Summary Environmental ImpactsSummary Environmental Impacts(per-book basis)(per-book basis)

Trad. E-Com.

Energy (MJ) 115 105

Conventional Air (kg) 0.2 0.1

Hazardous Waste (kg) 0.2 0.2

Greenhouse Gas (kg) 7 7

Page 15: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity Analysis

• ‘Traditional’ becomes better if:– Local distance to bookstore < 3 miles– Air transport of books > 700 miles– Orders not shipped together

Page 16: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Harry Potter CaseHarry Potter Case

• 250,000 books shipped on release date by Amazon.com– 9,000 trucks and 100 airplanes

• 2.5 lb. book, 0.7 lb. packaging (3.2 lbs.)– Bookstores got 10 per box

• Shopping trips for books avg. 11 miles– Marginal effects

Page 17: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson
Page 18: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Example 2: Centralized or Virtual Example 2: Centralized or Virtual WarehouseWarehouse

• Traditional: Stock at Local Warehouse with Rapid Delivery but High Stock Costs

• Centralized or Virtual: Stock at Remote Warehouse with Rapid Delivery by Higher Cost Mode. (Note E-commerce Model: Delivery Mode Choices).

Page 19: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Warehousing vs. Trucking ($ 100M)Warehousing vs. Trucking ($ 100M)

Effects Warehouse Truck Difference

Transactions ($ M) 180 200 -20

Elec. (M kw-hr) 44 20 23

Energy (TJ) 770 2,500 -1,700

Air Emissions (mt) 830 5,700 -4,900

Haz Waste (mt) 4,200 2,800 1,400

Fatalities 0.2 0.3 -0.1

Page 20: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Example: Defense Logistics AgencyExample: Defense Logistics Agency

• Military spare parts management: 632,000 part types, inventory of 108 million parts, value of $ 83 B, 286 storage locations.

• GAO – Consolidate spare parts inventory in major sites.

• GAO – also, reduce excess inventory (not analyzed here)

Page 21: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Category Cost (Saving)

EIO-LCA sector used

Non-major location Inventory Reductions

($693 million)

Warehousing and Storage

Shipping Back to Major Warehouses

$40 million Trucking and courier services, non-air

Major Locations Increased Inventory

$78 million Warehousing and Storage

Centralized WarehousingCentralized Warehousing

Page 22: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Local to Central WarehousesLocal to Central Warehouses

Effects Local Whs Truck Central Whs.

Elec. (M kw-hr) -300 10 30 -260

Energy (TJ) -5,400 1,000 600 -3,800

Air Emissions (mt) -5,700 2,300 640 -2,800

GGR (mt CO2) -440,000 74,000 49,000 -317,000

Haz. Waste (mt) -29,000 1,100 3,200 -25,000

Page 23: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Some Analysis IssuesSome Analysis Issues

• What are E-commerce future scenarios?

• What will happen with local manufacturing technology?

• What will be impact of new business models for controlling inventory (warehousing), manufacturing and shipping.

• What is appropriate time scale of analysis?

Page 24: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Analysis Boundary Issues (cont.)Analysis Boundary Issues (cont.)

• Buildings - decrease in retail or warehouse space?

• Shopping - will individuals substitute other travel for reduced shopping travel?

• Computers - what fraction of personal computer burdens should be allocated to E-commerce?

Page 25: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

Will E-commerce Improve or Will E-commerce Improve or Degrade the Environment?Degrade the Environment?

• Net Effect - hypothesis: depends upon product and processes and upon the analysis boundary.

• Appropriate Public Policy - – Don’t ignore service industries in environmental

policy.– Consider life cycle costs including social costs.– Take advantage of cost savings to create

environmental benefits

Page 26: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments

• AT&T Foundation’s Industrial Ecology Faculty Fellowship Program

• Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

• Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership

Page 27: Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing and Centralized Stock Keeping in the United States H. Scott Matthews and Chris Hendrickson

ReferencesReferences

• "Environmental and Economic Effects of E-Commerce: A Case Study of Book  Publishing and Retail Logistics," Hendrickson, Chris T., H. Scott Matthews, and Denise L. Soh,  Transportation Research Record 1763, pp. 6-12, 2001.

• "Harry Potter and the Health of the Environment," Matthews, H. Scott, Chris Hendrickson and Lester Lave, Spectrum, 20-22, November 2000.

• The Economic and Environmental Implications of Warehousing Strategies in the New Economy, Matthews, H. Scott and Chris Hendrickson,  J. of Industrial Ecology, 2002.