Upload
ivanna-volochiy
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 1/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
IN THIS ISSUE
1. JOURNALISTS STILL ATTACKED BY POLICE AND GANGSTERS / Ukraine
2. JOURNALISTS QUIT STATE-BACKED TV CHANNELS / Ukraine
3. TWO TV STATIONS SNUB VIDEO OF TORTURES / Ukraine
4. ANOTHER NGO FOUNDED BY GEORGIA’S FORMER PRIME-MINISTER TO WORK ON
DEVELOPMENT OF INDEPENDENT MEDIA / Georgia
5. JOURNALISTS NOT CONTENT WITH NEW WORKING CONDITIONS IN RENOVATED PARLIAMENT
BUILDING / Moldova
6. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH STRESSED LACK OF PLURALISM IN ARMENIAN BROADCASTING /
Armenia
7. COMMITTEE TO PROTECT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION RECORDED 77 CASES OF VIOLATION OF
RIGHTS OF JOURNALISTS AND MASS MEDIA / Armenia8. BILL AMENDING BROADCASTING CODE REGISTERED / Moldova
9. BELARUSIAN JOURNALISTS IN KYIV: “THINGS ARE PRETTY BRUTAL HERE” / Belarus
10. HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION BECOMES MORE COMPLICATED
IN AZERBAIJAN / Azerbaijan
11. JOURNALISTS WON TRIAL AGAINST TBILISI CITY COUNCIL / Georgia
12. PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN NAMED “PERSON OF THE YEAR” BY “ANS” TV COMPANY /
Azerbaijan
13. POLICEMEN OPEN FIRE AGAINST JOURNALISTS / Ukraine
14. BALTI COURT OF APPEALS DISMISSES BANK CLAIM AGAINST NEWSPAPER / Moldova
15. REGIONAL NEWSPAPER DEFENDS POLITICAL PRISONER, ITS FORMER EMPLOYEE / Belarus
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 2/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
JOURNALISTS STILL ATTACKED BY POLICE AND GANGSTERS
Ukraine / In defense of the media / 27.01.2014
Journalists, who cover mass protests in Ukraine, continue to suffer from the tyranny of the police andgangsters loyal to authorities. Attacks on journalists are reported not only in Kyiv, but accompany active
protests in Ukraine’s regions.IN LVIV, early on January 26th, three unknowns severely beat Vadim
Shevchenko (in the photo), a cameramen of the TV channel «Zik». The strangers attacked the journalist
near his house, and hit him in the face. It was clearly not a robbery as attackers did not take his money, but
seized an electronic TV channel pass. Recently Vadim filmed protesters’ storming of the regional council in
Lviv and other “hot spots”.
IN CHERKASSY on January 24th, during the clashes between protesters and the police a fighter of the
special police division “Berkut” seized a camera from Marianna Nemchenko, a photographer of the Internetmedia outlet “Pro Vse”. She was filming the detention of a group of young people. The police gave the
camera back after deleting all its content.
Also in Cherkassy two journalists of Polish TV channel “Belsat” were attacked: Serhei Marchuk was
wounded, and Yurii Vysotskii was detained by the police. The Union of Polish Journalists protested against
the arrests and expressed its worries that journalists could be deported to Belarus. The reporters are
known for their journalistic investigation in Belarus, and can face persecutions of the local authorities.
IN DNIPROPETROVSK, clashes near the building of the regional state administration took place on
January 26th. Two cameramen of the local “34 channel” asked for medical help. Both of them were wearingspecial clearly marked press vests. According to the journalists, they were shot in the back (in the photo)
with traumatic weapon by young men of sporty appearance, presumably hired by the authorities. In the
same city, in Dnipropetrovsk, the unknown showered stones onto a film crew of the TV channel ICTV.
IN ZAPORIZHIA during the dispersal of Euromaidan on the evening of January 26th Dmitrii Smolenok, a
journalist of the website “VV”, was beaten by the police and detained. Another journalist, Yurii Gudimenko,
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 3/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
was injured too. “I was filming until I was struck by police truncheon in my hand, in which I was holding my
journalist ID – a useless thing, as it appeared. The hand seems undamaged, only a finger is broken.
Hospitals are full of beaten people,” he wrote on Facebook.
IN MYKOLAIV Oleh Dereniuha, a journalist of the website “NilVesti”, was attacked at a rally in support of
the ruling Party of Regions. He was filming a fight, which occurred at the rally, when a group of people
started wringing the journalist’s hands and pulling him away.
IN KHARKIV on January 25th, young men wearing sports suits attacked the supporters of Euromaidan.
Some journalists were injured: one of them got a head injury, another (a photographer of the channel
“1+1”) got his camera broken.
IN KYIV soldiers of internal troops attacked Myroslav Misa, a journalist of the Radio “Liberty”, and seized
his phone when he was filming the police frisking people on the streets. The soldiers twisted the hands of
the journalist, torn his journalistic ID and threatened him.
Based on materials by Institute of Mass Information and Telekritika
JOURNALISTS QUIT STATE-BACKED TV CHANNELS
Ukraine / In defense of the media / 24.01.2014
Oksana Korniichuk, the chief editor of news, and Yulia Galushka, the anchor of the “Novosti” and the “Itogi
Dnia” programs, are leaving the First National TV channel.
According to “Telekritika”, a Ukrainian media-focused website, they both took a leave with a further
possibility to resign.
In early December, Ihor Medelian, a special correspondent of information and analytical programs of the
First National, and the channel’s correspondents Serhiy Lefter and Yaroslav Trakalo, quit their jobs in
protest against the channel’s editorial policy.
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 4/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
The First National is a state-owned channel promoting the standpoint of the Ukrainian authorities and
providing biased coverage.
Additionally, some journalists from the other state-backed channels have reportedly resigned. In particular,
Serhiy Barbu, a TV presenter, left the “112” channel, associated with Vitaliy Zakharchenko, Ukraine’s
Interior Minister. The journalist said in his Facebook page that any person “must know the moment for
drawing a line”. “Given the developments in the country, I ought to be somewhere else,” he added.
Serhiy Kudimov, a presenter of the «Business» channel, resigned too. “The level of pain I could endure was
exhausted, when people were killed at the Maidan, while I had to tell the viewers that Ukraine was
“improving” and everything was going well”, he said. TV channel «Business» is associated with Serhiy
Arbuzov, Ukraine’s First Vice Prime-Minister.
Source: Telekritika
TWO TV STATIONS SNUB VIDEO OF TORTURES
Ukraine / Politics and Media / 24.01.2014
Yesterday two leading Ukrainian TV channels – state-owned First National and private “Inter” loyal to the
authorities, didn’t broadcast shocking footage of the police mocking at a naked detained protestor. This
video shocked the Ukrainian society.
Officers of Ukraine’s Special Forces “Berkut” filmed a protestor whom they undressed and harassed. The
video was later posted online.
Snubbing these videos is another evidence that the authorities severely censor these channels.
Source: Теlekritika
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 5/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
ANOTHER NGO FOUNDED BY GEORGIA’S FORMER PRIME-MINISTER TO WORK ON
DEVELOPMENT OF INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Georgia / / 24.01.2014
Bidzina Ivanishvili, a former Prime Minister of Georgia and a billionaire, founded NGO “Mokalake”
(“Citizen”). According to a special statement, issued on this occasion, the organization is to work on
development of independent media in Georgia.
Ivanishvil heads “Mokalake”, while Georgiy Sabanadze is its Executive Director.
Georgiy Sabanadze refused discussing with Media.ge specific objectives of the organization and noted that
Ivanishvili would answer all the important questions from the public on Jan. 28, when a meeting with
representatives of Georgian and international media is to be held. Views and goals of the organization are
to be discussed in detail at this meeting.
Source: media.ge
JOURNALISTS NOT CONTENT WITH NEW WORKING CONDITIONS IN RENOVATED
PARLIAMENT BUILDING
Moldova / In defense of the media / 23.01.2014
Many journalists didn’t like their new working conditions in the renovated building of the Parliament of
Moldova. Representatives of media believe that these innovations restrict freedom of the press and could
complicate the work of journalists. In particular, they are denied access to the session hall.
The chief editor of “Adevărul” Alina Turcanu considers these innovations to be an attempt to restrict
freedom of speech. “Journalists are denied access to the session hall, not to distract MPs from the
important work. But why ban applies to corridors where MPs go?” the reporter wondered.
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 6/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
In turn, an expert of the Foreign Policy Association, Lina Grau, (previously a journalist accredited in the
parliament), draws attention to the fact that this initiative was discussed in advance with journalists and
representatives of non-governmental organizations. “This is an unprecedented attempt to close and restrict
access to information in the institution, which by definition is intended for public debate in the parliament,”
Grau says. The expert also expressed regret that the public did not resist this innovation.
A journalist of the web portal unimedia.md Elena Robu doesn’t welcome the new conditions of the press’
work. She believes that it will be more difficult for journalists to obtain information from MPs, with limited
access to them. “This initiative should be reconsidered,” Robu said.
Anisoara Login, a reporter of the channel Pro TV, also believes that journalists will face hard time in the new
conditions. “MPs can easily avoid media, and, accordingly, all the uncomfortable questions,” Login says.
Journalists found out about new working conditions in the parliament on Dec. 30, on the New Year’s Eve,
during the presentation of the parliament building, renovated after the events on April 7, 2009. Journalists
will have to work in a separate room, where they will watch MPs on the monitors. Access to MPs will be
restricted. From now on, journalists will have to contact parliamentarians through the Bureau of Public
Relations.
Source: Media- Azi.md
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH STRESSED LACK OF PLURALISM IN ARMENIAN BROADCASTING
Armenia / In defense of the media / 23.01.2014
The other day, Human Rights Watch published its annual report on the human rights situation in 2013 in
more than 90 countries worldwide.
The report on Armenia contains a separate section, which is devoted to freedom of speech. Having stressed
diverse print and online media, Human Rights Watch highlighted the lack of pluralism in broadcasting. “For
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 7/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
example, only one of Armenia’s 13 television stations carries live political talk shows”, the report reads.
The report’s authors also provided opinion of international observers, who noted the media’s “selective
approach” in covering post-presidential election developments, notably limiting views critical of the
conduct of the election.
Violations of journalists’ rights and media are mentioned in the report as well.
EaP Media Freedom Watch
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION RECORDED 77 CASES OF VIOLATION
OF RIGHTS OF JOURNALISTS AND MASS MEDIA
Armenia / In defense of the media / 23.01.2014
On Thursday the Committee to Protect Freedom of Expression presented it annual report on the activity of
the organization during the past year. As stated by Ashot Melikian, the Chairman of the Committee, in 2013
77 cases of violation of rights of journalists and pressure on media were registered in Armenia.
Ashot Melikyan compared 2013’s situation to that of 2012. According to him, in 2012 there were 64 cases
of violations of journalists’ rights in the Republic of Armenia. This means that the year 2013 year was less
favorable for journalists than the previous one. The expert puts the increase in cases of violations of rights
of journalists in the past year down to active political life of the country. In particular, the February 2013
Presidential Elections and the May elections to Yerevan Council of Elders may have had bad implications for journalists.
Ashot Melikyan noted that all the violations can be classified into three categories: physical violence,
pressure against media representatives, and violation of the right to receive and disseminate information.
According to him, in 2013 the Committee recorded 10 cases of physical violence comparing to four cases in
2012, 57 cases of pressure on media to 37 in 2012, and 10 cases of violations of the right to receipt and
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 8/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
dissemination of information to the 23 such cases in the previous year.
“The only positive moment in 2013 was the reduction of cases of violation of rights of journalists to receive
and disseminate information”, Ashot Melikian stressed. However, he also noted that in 2013 the country
saw increased number of lawsuits against journalists - 24 comparing to 17 in 2012. On most of them courts
delivered verdicts not in favor of journalists.
At the same time, Ashot Melikian is sure that the information presented in the annual report doesn’t reflect
the real situation with violations of journalists’ rights, “as many media representatives often conceal
violations against them, preferring not make their problems public and to solve the issues by themselves”.
EaP Media Freedom Watch
BILL AMENDING BROADCASTING CODE REGISTERED
Moldova / Politics and Media / 22.01.2014
As reported by the omg.md, after the failure to convene a parliamentary meeting in the framework of an
extraordinary session aimed at discussing the situation in the media field, the MPs of the Party of
Communists of the Republic of Moldova registered a bill on amendments to the Broadcasting Code. They
did so despite the fact that earlier the Parliamentary Commission on Mass Media had established a special
working group to draft the law regulating the relations between broadcasters and cable operators.
According to the bill introduced by the Communists, cable operators shall be obliged to broadcast TVchannels, which produce their own news and analytical programs, free of charge.
Also the MPs suggest introducing the provision that the members of the Coordinative Council on
Broadcasting be appointed by vote of 3/5 of the members of the Parliament.
Another interesting provision of the bill is that a natural or legal person, or their affiliates, may not possess
more than two licenses for broadcasting. The current legislation allows one owner hold up to five licenses.
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 9/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Earlier the press reported that Vladimir Plahotniuc, the Vice-Chairman of the Democratic Party, politician
and businessman, owns most of the media assets in Moldova, including four licenses for broadcasting of TV
channels with national and quasi-national coverage.
A few days earlier the members of the Parliamentary Commission on Mass Media formed a working group
to draft the law, clarifying the relationship between broadcasters and cable operators. The reason for it
creation was the removal of the TV channels RTR Moldova, Accent TV and Jurnal TV from cable operators’
packages. The cable TV services providers resumed retransmission of the said channels after negative
international reaction and protests rallies against their actions.
Source: omg.md
BELARUSIAN JOURNALISTS IN KYIV: “THINGS ARE PRETTY BRUTAL HERE”
Belarus / Politics and Media / 22.01.2014
Belarusian photojournalist Vasilii Fedosenko, working for the “Reuters” Agency in Kiev right now, was
injured by a rubber bullet on January 22nd.Serhei Grits, another Belarusian journalist, a photographer for
the Agency “Associated Press”, told told Radio Liberty about the event with his colleague. According to
Serhei Grits, a bullet hit Vasilii in the forehead, right between his goggles and helmet. However, Fedosenko
feels well now and continues work.
“I testify that the policemen with rifles aim and shoot journalists, photographers and cameramen
deliberately”, Grits added.“The worst thing is that the police officers attack everyone indiscriminately, they don’t look whether you’re
a journalist or not; they shoot and cover with tear gas everyone present there, Yurii Karmanov, another
Belarusian journalist of the “Associated Press” Agancy working in Kiev, reports. – A journalist’s ID doesn’t
help. The things are pretty brutal here”.
EAP MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH BASED ON MESSAGES BY BAJ.BY
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 10/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION BECOMES MORE
COMPLICATED IN AZERBAIJAN
Azerbaijan / Politics and Media / 22.01.2014
As recent report by the Human Rights Watch (HRW) informs, the human rights situation and the freedom of
expression in Azerbaijan has become even more complicated in 2013.
“The authorities of Azerbaijan have arrested on forged charges dozens of political activists, journalists
criticizing the authorities, dispersed a number of peaceful protests. The government adopted laws
restricting citizens’ fundamental rights. All this was happening on the background of Ilham Aliyev’s
elections as President for the third term with 84.5% of votes”, the report says.
Giorgii Gogia, a human rights expert on the South Caucasus, said that last year, the Azerbaijani authorities
turned to unprecedented measures against those critical towards their activities. The report mentions thenames of the arrested activists, journalists and bloggers. The HRW believes that the government has to
release them and stop the persecution of people for their political beliefs.
Rachel Denber, the HRW’s Deputy Director of the Europe and Central Asia Division, told the Washington
correspondent of the Turan News Agency in an interview that the Azerbaijani Head of State was trying to
mislead the world community, denying the existence of political prisoners in Azerbaijan.
President Aliyev, during his visit to Brussels, drew up a rosy picture, claiming that there were no“political
prisoners” in Azerbaijan. He also reminded that the majority of PACE members had rejected the resolution
on the existence of political prisoners in Azerbaijan in January of the previous year. Aliyev noted that“neither the Council of Europe, nor the European Parliament has yet agreed on the term “a political
prisoner”.
«I expect that a political leader of such a high level as of Ilham Aliyev would find time and receive detailed
information from his subordinates on the occurrences of allegedly politically motivated persecution, which
cast a dark shadow on his presidency. The officials should inform the president that, at least in 23 cases,
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 11/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
the authorities of Azerbaijan used contrived pretexts to arrest and prosecute political activists, journalists,
bloggers and human rights activists critical towards the government”, she said.
The police used different various pretexts to arrest these 23 activists – hooliganism, tax evasion, drug
possession and the like. The evidence presented at trials and documents of prosecution were very weak.
“All these cases are not only a tragedy for each of the detainees, they are a disgrace for the system of
justice of Azerbaijan, and this fact should concern the head of state in the first place”, R.Denber said.
Based on materials by www.contact.az, www.azadliq.org
JOURNALISTS WON TRIAL AGAINST TBILISI CITY COUNCIL
Georgia / Politics and Media / 21.01.2014
Tbilisi City Court sustained a claim filed by online-portal Media.ge against Tbilisi City Council. The latter one
is to meet the requirements of the media outlet and to provide it with public information on funds
transferred to TV channels and Radio stations from 2003 till the date of request. In addition, the City
Council is to compensate the lawsuit state fee paid by the media outlet. The given verdict was announced
by the judge Natia Buskadze on Jan. 20.
“The court agreed to the complainant arguments and decided that the requested information is public. The
claims of the defendant regarding the fact that given information is not archived in their office in a
processed way, cannot be a basis for the refusal to issue public information,” the judge clarified.
Media.ge Chief Editor Maia Tsiklauri filed a lawsuit to Tbilisi City Court on June 11, 2013. The first
preliminary hearing on the given dispute was held Nov.18. At one of the first hearings Court obliged Tbilisi
City Council to present evidences on whether or not requested information was archived in the City
Council. Due to the fact that the Municipality failed to provide such information to the Court, the trial was
adjourned several times.
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 12/16
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 13/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
brutal behavior towards Ukrainian journalists.Stop Censorship representatives stated that Ukrainian
journalists became victims of the authoritarian regime. At least 25 of them were injured as a result of
clashes in downtown Kyiv on January 19-20th. Some of them were hospitalized. At least 10 injured
journalists said the police deliberately targeted them and opened fire.
This is a regrettable symptom of the way in which Ukrainian authorities “respect” media freedom and
human rights. Almost all the injured journalists were wearing bright vests clearly marked PRESS, and were
holding professional photo and video equipment.
A Radio Liberty (Radio Svoboda) journalist who was broadcasting events live actually captured the moment
in which Berkut officers aimed and fired at reporters: http://www.radiosvoboda.mobi/a/25235297.html.
This is how a rubber bullet pierced through a Channel 5 camera: http://5.ua/69909. Natalka Pisnya, a
journalist at 1+1 TV channel, was injured in her leg with a similar bullet: http://5.ua/69925. A cameraman of
Spilno TV, an online TV channel, also suffered a hand injury while broadcasting the police attack:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/42895376.
Events in the "government quarter" of downtown Kyiv became powerful evidence of negative
developments in the Ukrainian media in the past few years: assaults, equipment damage, shooting and
detention became common practice aimed at preventing journalists from reporting about violations and
from knowing the truth.
When an American tank killed Ukrainian journalist Taras Protsiuk in Iraq, the American authorities assured
that the soldiers took the camera flash for a glint of a shooter’s gun. This was not an explanation,
journalists said throughout the world. However, in Ukraine we are not even expecting this kind of
explanations from authorities: no soldier or policemen was punished for violence exerted on peaceful
demonstrators since November 30th. On the contrary, the press service of the Ministry of Interior said today
that aimed fire at journalists had been a provocation against the police:
http://euromaidan.rbc.ua/rus/mvd-dopuskaet-chto-informatsiya-o-strelbe-po-zhurnalistam-2001201410580
0
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 14/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Stop Censorship was founded on May 21st, 2010. It is an informal group of journalists which has been
created in response to the oppression of freedom of speech in Ukraine.
Stop Censorship is the initiative of Ukrainian journalists and media NGOs aimed at defending freedom of
speech, preventing censorship, as well as combating interference with journalistic activities and violations
of professional standards in covering social and political issues.
The movement neither supports, nor received funds from any political party.
To learn more or to join the Stop Censorship please visit:
http://www.telekritika.ua/news/2010-05-22/53128
Its official blog: http://stopcensorship.wordpress.com
Or Twitter: http://twitter.com/Stopcensorship
Contact person:
Artem Sokolenko, coordinator of Civic movement Stop Censorship
Tel.: + 38 050 440 46 08
e-mail. [email protected]
BALTI COURT OF APPEALS DISMISSES BANK CLAIM AGAINST NEWSPAPER
Moldova / Media in the legal field / 20.01.2014
Balti Court of Appeals dismissed the case of Moldindconbank against Adevarul newspaper, in which the
former requested damages in the amount of over 11,000 euros. The conflict arose after the newspaper
published an investigation on bank loans taken by Chisinau Court of Appeals chairman Ion Plesca.
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 15/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Previously, Chisinau District Court also dismissed the case, but the bank attacked its decision at the higher
court.
Roman Zadoinov, the newspaper’s lawyer, said that the Court of Appeals dismissed the claim due to lack of
legal grounds. In addition, the bank had violated the procedure of filing a lawsuit to the court. The lawyer
also argued that the information published in the investigation titled “Judge with bank debts of dozens of
millions lei” did not affect the interests of the bank. “The media has the right to publish information about
public officials. If a newspaper affected the interests of the judge Plesca, then he should have filed a lawsuit
- but not the bank,” Zadoinov said.
Earlier, on June 5th, 2013, Chisinau District Court decided the information in the newspaper Adevarul did
not harm the interests of Moldindconbank, and representatives of the bank failed to provide sufficient
evidence to support their claim. The plaintiff stated that the investigation “Judge with bank debts of dozens
of millions lei” published on September 20th by Adevarul, contained “information that does not correspond
to reality, which defames and damages the reputation” of financial institutions quoted in the article,including Moldinconbank.
The investigation described how the chairman of the Chisinau Court of Appeal Ion Plesca registered as
collateral the same apartment at two banks in order to obtain several loans totaling 17 million lei (over one
million euros). The newspaper noted that the price of the apartment was estimated at nearly 1.2 million lei
(about 73,600 euros), which is ten times less than the amount of credits received.
The newspaper informs that a similar trial involving another bank mentioned in the investigation,
Victoriabank, is also in the process of being heard. The financial institution also demands 200,000 lei from
Adevarul.
Source: adevarul.md
REGIONAL NEWSPAPER DEFENDS POLITICAL PRISONER, ITS FORMER EMPLOYEE
Belarus / Politics and Media / 20.01.2014
8/13/2019 EaP Media Freedom Watch 3 2014 en
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/eap-media-freedom-watch-3-2014-en 16/16
NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER
MEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECTMEDIA FREEDOM WATCH PROJECT
20.01.2014 - 27.01.201420.01.2014 - 27.01.2014
This newsletter has been produced within Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Watch Project, funded by the European
Union. The content of this publication can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Eugenii Vaskovich, a “Bobruisk courier” journalist have been punitively confined in a special housing unit
(SHU) for eight months out of almost three years of imprisonment. Now a 22 -year-old prisoner’s weight is
65 kg, while he is 186 cm tall.
A protest statement has been published on the website of the newspaper “Bobruisk Courier”, where E.
Vaskovich had worked for a year and a half.
The newspaper’s editors claims that Eugenii Vaskovich has been punitively confined in SHU for 247 days
out of almost three years of serving his sentence in the prison №4 of Mogilev city. Moreover, the newspaper
reports that punitive confinement in SHU is considered to be tortures, according to international
classification.
Eugenii was punitively confined for the last time for 10 days, on New Year’s Eve, Dec. 27.
This punishment regime (he is allowed to have only one grocery parcel weighing up to two kg within a
year) has affected his physical condition - Eugenii Vaskovich’s weight is only 65 kg, while his height is 186
cm.
The editors reminds that a citizen of the Republic of Belarus, who is serving his sentence in prison, is not
deprived of his or her legitimate civil rights.
“Moreover, -“Bobruisk Courier” writes - Eugene Vaskovich was convicted under a legally unjustified article,
for the actions he hadn’t done, - damaging on a large scale, while the damage from his actions amounted
to 253,000 rubles (at the time about $ 84). This is the cost of a small section of whitewash of administrative
facade that had been soiled.
Eugene Vaskovich was convicted for arson attempt of the KGB building in Bobruisk, where firebombs were
thrown on the night of Oct. 17, 2010. On May 18, 2011, Vaskovich, together with other members, was
convicted for criminal charges with “hooliganism” and “intentional destruction of or damage to property on
a large scale” to seven years of imprisonment in a penal colony with a reinforced regime.
EaP Media Freedom Watch