ORIGINAL

NO. 2012- 1987

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

JAMES 'HAYDEN',RELATOR,

-VS-

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE NANCY FUERST,

RESPONDENTOHIO

S.CT. PRAC. R. 10.5 (B)

MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Relator, pro se'

JAMES HAYDEN (Hajdin) s.o. #0099600Cuyahoga county jail1215w3rdst.Cleveland, Ohio

44113

E VE DD E r"0 i 3 2 0 12

CLERK OF COURTSUP^E-Dil E URy 0 F 0 F!9®

Council of record for Respondent:

Timothy J. McGinty (0024626)is Also the Cuyahoga county prosecutor.1200 Ontario St. Cleveland, Ohio 44113

DEC 132012

CLERK OF COURTSUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO

DISMISS... Motions of withdrawl of plea Cr. 32.1 are active presently all cases.

1. Respondent misrepresents the history and facts of this Petition seeking command

enforcement of the law as stated and eriforcement of CODE OF JUDICIAL

CONDUCT 211 AND OTHER SPECIFIED RULES, LAWS THEREBY, AND

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, DUE PROCESS, U. S. CONSTITUTIONAL

AMENDMENT 14 & 5 etc. against the Administrative duties of respondent.

II. Actual history of relevant facts ; relator was originally transferred from

(convicted of corruption judge Bridget McCafferty ) case # 516154 transferred to judge

Timothy McMonagle AS the mental health docket rules 30.1 require as a matter of

law. Relator was then manually assigned, again, judge McMonagle as mental health

eligible and required by Court's own rules on cases 534012 and 544297 ( see attached

docket summaries) also note the present court has failed to update it's 555897 docket

summary since Jo'y to conceal impropriety [see dockets all cases as requested]. On

present case the arraignment judge errantly assigned me to judge Maureen Clancy though

she is Not mental health certified , ( when Judge Timothy McMonagle retired my

mental health docket status was illegally interfered with R.C. 2921.45 since the rule

requires I was to have been maintained on the MENTAL-HEALTH DOCKET BY

LAW AND M.D.O. it is an administrative judges duty to enforce the rule and to correct

the prior incorrect judge assignment to the mental health docket whiGh the law requires I

be. My complaint is valid and fully compliant. (sa ^A^^ ^I zl

(tS ^^6 6 -a-- 10 Or 5,,4 t-0 Ob (jo S,4 z)5jj^ *-^W.U C.OAO^°'^"'^8T? 04'=?E^et

2

ft5RT4 L. ^^^^ ^4 /A LYJ®PROBATION STATUS OF WHICH NEVER CEASED AND I REMAIN.(SEE PAGE

# 9- 29 ON 555897 DOCKET'DATED 11/06/12 PROPOSAL (MENTAL HEALTH

^ ,CONTINUOUS DIAGNOSIS) POSTED. ^^rC. P,1c;g ^e^/ ^O " M

,...........................................................................................................................

III. RELATORS' COMPLAINT IS NOT DEFECTIVE. THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT IS

ACCOMPANIED BY A SWORN AFFIVADIT.

Note: On*page one of respondents brief the respondent acknowledges and confirms myI &LFR14

sworn affidavit as accepted by the OFFICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, is

fully compliant, and then the respondent falsely claims I failed to attach an affidavit.

I refuse to entertain such blatant *stupidity. (With all due respect)*

Regarding ` B.'respondent clearly has no grasp of the law.

Federal civil rights lawsuit 1:12 cv 2265James Hayden v Nancy A. Fuerst

(no mention of any government entity in the caption of case , not that it would matter

since statute 2969.25 R.C.is irrelevant since a Mandamus actions are not the legislative

intent of that statute (check your case law you are not on point. It's for law suits and I

did file and confirmed by the federal 6th district OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT

ACCEPTANCE OF MY LAWSUIT CIVIL ACTION FOR FILING. Plus the office

of the clerk of Ohio fupreme Court of whoms' jurisdiction it is to accept or reject

such filings has deemed mine compliant by APPENDIX E. WHICH SPECIFIES

MY FINANCIAL STATUS AND WAS CONFIRMED AND NOTORIZED BY

SPECIFIC JAIL STAFF. MY LAWSUIT IS EXPLICITLY DESCRIBED IN

3

COMPLAINT AND THE RESPONDENT WAS INFORMED HEREIN

WHEREBY RESPONDENT MAY ACCESS ALL PERTINENT DETAILS.

C.. RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH S.CT

PRAC. RULE 10.3 IN THAT PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO REFER TO EACH

OTHER AS RESPONDENT OR RELATOR THUS RESPONDENTS MOTION IS

NULL AND VOID AS A MATTER OF RULE.(AS STATED FINACIAL

STATEMENTS WERE ATW-HED AND CAN BE FURTHER ACCESSED ON

DOWNLOAD. (PUBLIC ACCESS- REDUNDANT)

D. THE WORD OHIO IS NAMED 6 DIFFERENT TIMES ON THE FACE PAGE OF

COMPLAINT [NOW 8]. THAT SHOULD SUFFICE AS NOTICE.

E. RELATOR DID INCLUDE HIS ADDRESS [ SEE PAGE 6 JUST ABOVE WHERE

IT STATES EXHAUSTION OF STATE REMEDIES CIVIL RIGHTS, YOU'SEE MY

NAME AND ADDRESS. RULES REQUIRE ONLY RESPONDENTS ADDRESS ON

A MANDAMUS COVER PAGE. [ NOTORYS' AFFIANCE OF MY COMPETENCE]

F. JUDGE FUERST IS THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE ON ALL CASES

III. RELATOR IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF SOUGHT. ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES

ARE REQUIRED TO ENFORCE THEIR COUTS' RULES'.THERESPONDENT

SIMPL Y MISQUOTES WHICH RULE DOESAPPLY. IT IS MANDATORY WHEN

ON MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET MDO PROBATION SUPER VISION TO ASSIGN

IMMEDL4 TEL Y TO MENTAL HEALTH SINCE MY HISTORY WAS PRESENT,

PRIOR, AND BEFORE . S4C111lS^^0 L.D6,4L ^ CJL^ ^P ^fDdk-r 96" ^

^^^ ^A (1) C ^ ^^r^^MT W n< ^^ ^ ^ ^^^blV l PC

rp J^OYI^?^l^^^^d^j C^9^ iy ^7'SC

4U^G 170 Cr#ets1^

^, ^z^ e.^A(s^)

e-A&MEOL)<lv-.-

..®

A Fl^/^

Ab -r ^^ ^ E r-,^-^_

^ (7W f)

,/^^,4jZl^ln^^' V f t-[A VC REEA) Ort^ ^h^^I--^L

hOZj,T:r

rA

14 1UO,iz-/AE4- b:^WJc^^^^ OLI

%^ me:^. q 4L/l

LJ1^,F1eE7 ^itd^ ^1Z'^l A/010kS

^ `^r3 I^^' ^^^%^^ _ ^ ^° l^^/^'I BN/5'^/^.^/l^

^kz^^)N® ^ ^A^InPo j- 0^-.^ s^z ^^'^'f/^

,-A^Ol1v,E ^^^e^^ s^^^^^ aJ^ ► ^ ^ ^^'^^/^^ ^^J

aCl-612ZMN°^^C Z-4

-76 1/1.CAQ3L4-

k

`^(^^^'^^ ^`"^'^,^^or,^' ^'%,^ims i1^ ^ ^^',^r^7N►^i^^

S.

M.iUM L 91^9 l.r# -I)OZr-1^1 - A-^,^i AIl ^ ^^ ^®r

1"AAWAAA, V^ ^^o LsA^f Qn"Aor, lqS

A--^ ^YAIAUS^rDAbmr l,^^ ^9

,/nV k.CIA ^ 4 i .LA Lj 0.A)

r/q-G%^^ i,,&U/n 97A OcZ^^ ^MI'l-, a^ 1"YWdA^ 1,^s

A

p^s^U^S A/'t^ A`^^ 07ZeTZ/^^U.AXV- L,AW

^,PWM 1e-Z,<^eAO L5^b-;e- 14v'E-

a4^^ i6A,00 ffL1q?';P,2 -^ ^^^rt^^ L-7V

_4-V v3'O'119 L8 t

Alo is ^^^ob^` i le^^ yiae"1 ff, U7 ^^U..-^'

A® 90y Z.99U1nY6 IU,';T

/lrA ^-MA4l^,4iVt,)-e,

^-Ad

^0.

r ^C^^'^^n^t ^'r^"c^^T®^ ^ ^'^'^'^ ^ ^ ^^ ►^^^^

yoo so

WfViGP

&/ YlGti ^A^^IzP2

0 ^ ^FZ-61ea4 1.^

A/So fAQ-e-'07^We5 In if 121^ IA'),4 l--

v.•)Oi^e rZ7L^^2F-,

^S l S

L4c^^tli7`

AA^ AM7 ^'^^ Z"^sf,a^^^^

c^ ^^ /^ ^^^ ^-a` /^? lsv^ ^ ^^'^^ ^ i^^^ 3s ,^^.: Is+r'^ l°i?^cri^^^

IM,'j fF //I ®S i,4J?rleA:5-7

^ i^ !^EF°)e5

c,tMLOA-JS,

r4A,PA1 6ea/f-o

t^ 3a iC 04

fES^^O,^JQVz S boi ^ ^^ ^^^M-,^'Ze F 1,*^ ^ ^ 405' PX046-5r<'

^^^^ ^AM

og F=ie^IEcCe^^ P4 ^

^^^osx-^' f4goi)q6.

1,q^404-

0a^ ^ ^ ^^^^^in't^ JO&Z .144^^^ ^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^K'sz,

OA1 AA)A - -

CJ U'fL

1k^Y+L14'ra Jo^&WAls

•-

^^ s4lY

XpL-;^eA,C C^Al"A» J^^^- /VS417

® ^,^lj5^a In'q C^E- -70- /q5^1c7"V ?^^-/

Rn1O 4e6l1S1e*-- ^^r^^'^" ^dv3G^' ^^ jer^-^25 7?)

^EE19-ge- ^9,WV ^-^ 1-0^, t,)A)P,e

As ,^^^^^^O LkOLe RIC-PWor),d L

YI)F-,o®-41,^9 #Y11-3

cp- 0 m //fa^ po l'1o^^ ta/ RCLA-rO!b6 AA0P,,i:6y

)411,^ .^EZEI-0 -QFA-^ A62;d1,4,4 UK, /)1,4 i z- -733

^^^^^^ ^^^^s ^ ^^ ^'rrQv^^^s' ^^^^ ►s^^^^^ ^x,^1^ ^s^^^^9 ^ f,^ -^WA7

^^'Z#f 57,V11"l

C^- 1Co 9^^sacaj^

-ro^, .

d 2p-

t a

^ e ►^^^^p e4^^,^f^^^^^,va ^^^,,-^^^ _

-°^-® ^ r^,^oo^^^

,^^ bo 40m t`®r O/V P `A-^ /Zig^

7iM^°,^v-7--

A-Al"vt1

NJ0 14A^4 "ekF

t

c ;'O^a^^^ !i^ .^.._.--^-- •--^^-^^^^^v1

NJ

e,,,,.)-^ CR,4_,'6V c3F ^C-JU^9J

c>ase aummary

A C..^^^ ^1► J^l^t ^^^ -r^^3.^^. A^_^^^Q[ [^^-^ E ` ^^.^F^^^^fl,e^^ ^ ^^6^^,^f.t^^ ^ r^^s

^......^.^^^.......^ .^....^.^....:J ^ r^ l ^ .1 , ^ t ^ ^^^^^^^' ........... ....,.,..^..^.^.........-....'.!

^.. . ...-^.r ...SUMM A RYC^'F/T CASE

CASE INFORMATION DEFENDANT INFORMATION

Number: CR-11-555897-A Naamber: 48811THE STATE OF OHIO vs. JAMES Name: JAMES R HAYDEN

Ca^^^o^' HAYDEN Status: DEFN JAIL

Status: CASE OPEN Date of Birth: 08/27/1961

Judge Name: NANCY A FUERST Race: WHITE

PO Name: N/A Sex: MALE

HEARING SET FOR 01/10/2013Next Event: AT 09:00 AM IN ROOM 15B

JUSTICE CENTER

Arrested: N/A

BOND INFORMATIONBond Number Amount Type Date Set Date Posted Bondsman/Surety Co.

603141 $25,000.00 CASH/SURETY/PROP. 11/04/2011

ACTIONS

Event Date Event10/20/2011 ARRESTED10/31/2011 INDICTED ORIGINAL

10/31/2011 CAPIAS11/02/2011 JAIL11/04/2011 ARRAIGNED11/14/2011 REFER TO PSYC. CLINIC

11/14/2011 PRETRIAL HELD11/14/2011 CONTINUANCE12/12/2011 PSYC.RPT.CPT. JAIL12/15/2011 PRETRIAL HELD12/15/2011 CONTINUANCE12/21/2011 PRETRIAL HELD12/21/2011 CONTINUANCE01/31/2012 LEAVING JAIL

02/23/2012 JAI L03/06/2012 PRETRIAL HELD03/06/2012 CONTINUANCE03/13/2012 PRETRIAL HELD03/14/2012 PRETRIAL HELD03/14/2012 CONTINUANCE03/27/2012 PRETRIAL HELD

http://cpdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/p_CR-CaseSummary.aspx

CHARGES

Statute Description

2911.12.A(1) BURGLARY

2913.02.A THEFT; AGGRAVATED THEFT(1)2921.51.D IMPERSONATION OF CERTAIN

OFFICERS

r,e)12/10/2012

Case Summary n, ENV-c-

1!

;I I t c

-^r ^Fw,waE •

jF- 49OXOt')

.. . ]" . ; ' . ^. ' . - .i .>^^:..c . .. . :. .:

^ _ ...,.- ...v, .. ....

C A S E S U M R Y...., t»F ,uuu^... ..... .... .,...., . -..

CASE INFORMATION DEFENDANT INFORMATION

Number: CR-10-544297-A

THE STATE OF OHIO vs. JAMESCaPt°°^` HAYDEN

Status: CASE CLOSED

Judge Name: NANCY A FUERST

PO Name: BILL KAVOURIAS

Next Event: N/A

Arrested: N/A

Number:

Name:

Status:

Date of Birth

Race:

Sex:

48811

JAMES R HAYDEN

DEFN JAIL

08/27/1961

WHITE

MALE

BOND INFORMATION

Bond N umber Amount Type Date Set Date Posted Bondsman/Surety Co.

586356 $5,000.00 CASH/SURETY/PROP. 11/30/2010

ACTIONSEvent Date Event11/14/2010 ARRESTED11/23/2010 INDICTED ORIGINAL

11/24/2010 JAIL11/30/2010 ARRAIGNED12/07/2010 PRETRIAL HELD12/07/2010 CONTINUANCE

Sk- 12/22/2010 MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET

12/22/2010 LEAVING JAIL

12/22/2010 PLEA12/22/2010 SENTENCED08/03/2011 PV HELD11/02/2011 JAIL01/31/2012 LEAVING JAIL ^

02/23/2012 JAI L 103/27/2012 PRETRIAL HELD

OTHER DEFENDANTS

CHARGES

Statute Descr6pt6on2913.51.A RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY

pm-(/

J` owz

tIO I 5Yi& -rO A

40 AA y

51^405-i,o Pe `

OTHER CASES

Other CasesCR-11-555897-ACR-10-534012-AC R-08-516194-ACR-07-492545-A

e

http://cpdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/p_CR_CaseSummary.aspx 12/10/2012

Case Summary 4)1^ ,^ ^A /-z/y

-S

y iI. .ST S - _

... .... r. .. ....

C ^ F.-MAR Y.....

INFORMATION DEFENDANT INFORMATIONCASE .^^

Number: CR-10-534012-A Number: 48811THE STATE OF OHIO vs. JAMES Name: JAMES R HAYDEN

Caption: HAYDEN Status: DEFN LVJAIL

Status: CASE CLOSED Date of Birth: 08/27/1961

Judge Name: NANCY A FUERST Race: WHITE

p0 Name: BILL KAVOURIAS Sex; MALE

Next Event: N/A

Arrested: N/A

BOND INFORMATION

Bond NumberAmount Type Date Set Date Posted Bondsman/Surety Co.

571309 $10,000.00 CASH/SURETY/PROP. 02/19/2010

ACTIONS 11 CHARGES

Event Date Event02/05/2010 ARRESTED02/16/2010 INDICTED ORIGINAL

02/17/2010 JAI L02/19/2010 ARRAIGNED02/26/2010 PRETRIAL HELD02/26/2010 CONTINUANCE03/08/2010 PRETRIAL HELD04/05/2010 REFER TO PSYC. CLINIC04/20/2010 PSYC.RPT.CPT. JAIL

05/12/2010 PRETRIAL HELD05/12/2010 CONTINUANCE05/14/2010 FINAL PRETRIAL HELD

06/08/2010 PLEA06/15/2010 SENTENCED06/22/2010 LEAVING JAIL

11/24/2010 JAI L12/22/2010 MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET

12/22/2010 LEAVING JAIL

12/22/2010 PV HELD08/03/2011 PV HELD

OTHER DEFENDANTS OTHER CASES

s 1^ ^

http://cPdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/p_CRCaseSummary.asp^

Statute Description2911.13.A BREAKING AND ENTERING2911.31.A SAFECRACKING2913.02.A(1) THEFT; AGGRAVATED THEFT

2909.05.B(1)(B) VANDALISM2923.24.A POSSESSING CRIMINAL TOOLS

50 ^^^^

194

12/10/2012

Case Summary

^ » r r i

-f^c

, . ... ..... .

^ w _ ,^ ^y+ P '^ :`^ ^ ^ v •^ . . ,...... N., ^'^............^ ^fr. ^^

.r .;

. ,,.,,.:, . ,. . .,..^.. .

C Ab E -%;U f2i M Y^.. ,w, . . .. . ...,^.. ..,.,.,^.. .,, . . .^,..

CASE INFORMATION DEFENDANT INFORMATION

Number: CR-08-516194-A Number: 48811

THE STATE OF OHIO vs. JAMES Name: JAMES R HAYDEN

CaPti°n` HAYDEN Status: DEFN LVJAIL

Status: CASE CLOSED Date of Birthr 08/27/1961

Judge Name: TIMOTHY E MCMONAGLE Race: WHITE

PO Name: BILL KAVOURIAS Sex; MALE

Next Event: N/A If 14, A)

Arrestsd: N/A Alm J"`L

BOND INFORMATION

Bond Nurr'Ser Arnounat Type Date Set Date Posted Bondsman/Surety Co.

544881 $25,000.00 CASH/SURETY/PROP. 10/09/2008

ACTIONS

Event Date Event09/27/2008 ARRESTED10/07/2008 INDICTED ORIGINAL

10/07/2008 JAI L10/09/2008 ARRAIGNED10/16/2008 REFER TO PSYC. CLINIC11/18/2008 PSYC.RPT.CPT. JAIL11/26/2008 REF MNTL TREATMNT UNTIL CMP

01/15/2009 LEAVING JAIL

02/04/2009 JAI L02/09/2009 MENTAL HEALTH DOCKET02/18/2009 REFER TO PSYC. CLINIC02/27/2009 PSYC.RPT.CPT. JAIL

03/04/2009 PLEA03/04/2009 REFERRED PROBATION - PSI

03/30/2009 P.S.I. CPT03/31/2009 SENTENCED06/08/2009 LEAVING JAIL

06/15/2010 PV HELD

OTHER DEFENDANTS

CHARGES

Statute Doscription

2911.12.A(4) BURGLARY2903.13.A ASSAULT (PEACE OFFICER)

X/oz w,6^F ^^1^^ ^^^ U^^^^^/Of74

OTHER CASES

Other Cases

CR-11-555897-A V-3

http://cpdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/p_CR_CaseSummary.aspx12/10/2012

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH

NORTHCOAS ,T BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NORTHFIELD

REVIEIIV/UPDATE FOR HAYDEN, JAMESPLAN DATE: 2/14/2012

PRINTED: 2/14/2012 4:56:17PM

DIAGNOSES ^v

AXIS

1

1

11

23

3345

EFFECTIVE CODE STATUSDATE

2/2/2012 29690 P2/2/2012 2989 S2/2/2012 29640 T2/2/2012 295902/2/2012 295702/2/2012 30192/2/2012 41492/2/2012 4122/2/2012 4962/2/2012 -2/2/2012 -

DESCRIPTION

UNSPECIFIED EPISODIC MOOD DISORDER

PSYCHOTIC DISORDER NOSBIPOLAR MOST REC EPI MANIC, UNSPEC

SCHIZO UNDIF, UNSPECIFIEDSCHIZOAFFECTIVE, BIPOLAR, UNSPEC

PERSONALITY DISORDER NOSCHRONIC ISCHEMIC HEART DIS UNSP

OLD MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONCHRONIC AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION NEC

LEGAL SYSTEM/CRIME,MODERATE

GAF RATING 35

•STRENGTHS: Communicates needs clearly III kVIM'W

LIABILITIES: legal issuesbf S^-^ac^dZze

LONG TERM VIEW: resolution of legal problems and return to the community.

'RIORITY LEVEL: 01STAGE OF RECOVERY: Dependent/Unaware

^^^^` 3 ^ ^l^^r^^

^^X trm

'fEw -

5^^1^^ i9 c.^rG^^ C L.i &^q

^. ^^`^36?°' ^^"^..... ^

STATUS: Active 1START DATE: 1/31/2012

PROBLEM: Mr Hayden is incompetent to stand trial due to psychiatric symptoms.Review/Update...02/14/2012...Mr. Hayden met with fellow yesterday, waiting for evaluationresults, continue per treatment plan.

GOAL: Mr Hayden will become competent to stand trial. Discharge criteria - Mr Hayden's legalcompetency will have been determined prior to discharge to the community.

START DATE: 1 /31 /2012TARGET DATE: 2/20/2012

OBJECTIVE: Mr Hayden will receive an evaluation of his competence to stand trial.

START DATE: 1 /31 /2012TARGET DATE: 4/6/2012

INTERVENTION: Mr. Hayden will participate in RTC groups on Saturday, & Sunday @ 1000 andin RTC Flashcards on Tuesday @ 1400 for 30 minutes facilitated by staff, tohelp Mr. Hayden understand the charges against him, the nature of the judicialprocesses that he will be involved in, potential pleas, plea bargaining,appropriate behavior in court, and how to cooperate with his attorney IL" a^

- ----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------HAYDEN, JAMES - 749575

)MH 7000 (Rev 05/08)

ol -q .: -.. ---- - ^.r^

Page 1 of 6

(Form to be used by a

^. , ., . ., _..

U]

^ , G-- A.*'^ n

in filing a civil rights complaint) ^^^

STATES DISTRICT COURTFor the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

JAMES HAYDEN

COMPLAINT: TITLE 42 $ 1983

Plaintiff, CASE # 6 ^ ^t 1;6^ & ^ ^

^C°`.34 ^V.

JUDGE:^'J^/

^^ mt F7 .b^.:.

Nancy A FuerstStephen G NoffsingerCarrie HeindrichsDefendants.

1. Previous lawsuits

P .

^^^ ^

4p-t4a,^l 41,^Ot4CA) 00612t-l SS-3",P^?

CIVIL RIGHTS

^^ ^,^^... '.

A. have you begun other lawsuits in state or federal court dealing with the samefacts involved in this action or otherwise relating to your imprisonment? YES

B. If your answer to A. is yes,... ANSWER IS NO. ... .................................1 ...................2 ...................

II. Place of present confinement : Cuyahoga county jail 1215 w. 3rd. St. ClevelandOhio.

A. Is there a prisoner grievance procedure in this institution? YES `

B. Did you present the facts relating to your complaint in the state grievanceprocedure? No there is no STATE grievance procedure in the county jail ; facts relatedto my complaint are not jurisdictionally grievable , this complaint does not encompassthislail. Related issues are presented within statement herein.

C. If your answer is "yes" MY ANSWER IS NO`4^-'

D. If your answer is "no", explain why not: Irrelevant due to my suing persons forcivil rights violations outside the iail, the jail has no subject matter jurisdiction ,Nor interest in this rp esent complaint nor issues presented.

Co ^^^^^^ -C:- ^-c^n)o^ ► ^^^^ o^^^^es°^ ^^gs lU^^^^r q 6®^^^^s,9^s^

.

the prec ing month's income credited to my account each time the amount in/he accountexceeds $.\.00. ^ich installment p^yments must be m^.de u,zltil the fee is p^d/n full.

FUR ER, I UNDERST ND THAT:

\sf thutco of my a ticcontinue t be liablaf/

I have r the for^Application, he co willmanner set f rth above.APPlicati:on. ' ^

I auth rizer facility to wh' h I^ the federal co

a)anin aIaverage mon ly.d

b uhsequ/i

or a

i0

s and, wh

'er understai

\^

►n facilityin,ed to withdr,

free for this

monthly payments

a; am Iiable for th/ f-ull fee. I furtherhe full amount of fee ven after I am

nd I-underst nd that f I submit thisfunds exist, collect th fu11 fee in thethat no mo ey should e sentwith this

I ^m housed andJYmy fund accoui

(20% or greaternce for the past

my previous m(

iny correctionaland forward to

anymonths),

until I e full filing fee of $350.00 for tha^s action.

Print yourname OO ^?k^

S

3'^;S ^S ^

^..

TO BE COMPLETED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF INSTITUTION (PLEASEATTACH A LEGIBLE CERTIFIED COPY OF INMATE'S PRISONER ACCOUNTSTATEMENT FOR THE PREVIOUS SIX MONTH PERIOD).

I certify that th ttached is a true and accurate copy of the inmate's prisone a^ ountsta e^ ^^si d..

Authorized Officer of Institution

SC1AW-!^^ CCC-0(^ ^^,^^^ MA 1^^^ 7r^r r ^°o ^'c^ 4-^ ^^^Y ^ ^^ ^e ^ ^

. PA^^^^^Cl lo^ ! 7a ':t7- ('sJ:9-zC ^^^El{C4 7-161G^lrr /t'o0

09/09kk ^^^ oeqiv /7' ^^ ^ --7' 4 S:^A)`r

(IG AnJ ,I -A7^.^'4l^ ^3°^^ ^^a.^^-cpa'^ yo^^2 ^'^

CV

O

NOf0

WU^ULOY)U-W ^

W Z

ci) OU

ZQD H

0 ^

0

}

U

CV

ON

LriN

0`)^O

O

T pN LO

U N 00

Q 7 r

0

T ..Q ^p

U H

C _

^ O

T ..(a Nd Q

O ^

U TO

0U

Cm O

O

O Q

C.7

O

^

a^U

NOOMNNON_

ON

rnc

00m

O00rnrn0O

i^0U)

c0Q

UU)^0EN

xU)W

Z_

^

_

ai

Et0z

N N I^ M N N 0 0 N O O C) M C) N N 0 0 M N O CM O C) M

O CO O V COO (O (00 CD ^ ^ COO O (O I7' COD GOO O (00 COO ^ O ^ (0 COD V O C09 V V

C) O C) O O O C) O C) O' O O O O C) C) C) C) O C) C) C) C) C) C) O O C) C)O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O C) O O O O O OEfl Efl EA V3 ffl E9 691 69 61). 613 6-11 691 io 491 fA ffl EA EA V3 EH Ef) EH E+9 Efl EA V> 619, ta EH

O O I, V' N... h00 V O) V' Q) O) LO O CO CO CO (D r t0 CO CO CO CO CDO I^ O^ i^ M O O M I^ '7 r r' d' t N O O 0 O O O w O O O O r^ 00 M^ p r, M C) I+j (+j tl) N O O LO I, M O C) N O O O tf) N O O O O lf) O

EH cP O> LO r (0 M fA Efl N EH EA EA ;; ER EA EH ^ ^(A (A EA ^M N^ EA Efl

^ N TT - EA EA EH tA V^fA E!3 d-T 613

0 0 0 0 O O O o O O O O o 0 0 o O 0 0 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0O o O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O pEf3 H-7 Efl E+9 fF3 EA fa Efl EA (fl V) Efl [A 69 EA K) K-1 69 H-T &3 EH EA E9 EA EA 6-7 EA 6a ER

o a 1^ i, cJ ^°s a7 ^c- t.n cn in o cXJ ua df3 07 O iS} a o O o.n in O' o o a a us

O M N N ^.Y N O CO LC'> M NO I`^; 67 N r O u7 O O N h° O O O M c37 u'7

Cfl tC7 '1\V ^ r!' M <9° N N

N r ^ C) ^ 1-1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ N ^ M^ -(F9

ER ^ N61^ 69 b^4, ^ H3 Sf3 ^ ^ E!-?

M

(0 LO r .

N ^ f ^

^ w ^ 0-1

COO LO ~ C) ^OI) C) d' W M N ^ w ^ 0r0 ^ N^^ ^ ^ N00

W _oc N C^ ') CN O V M (O 0)M ^I) 00 N LO o0 O M ^ O N u) 1^ ^ N u) I^ 6) N COF-

ULO U^ cMo c^o cC°o c^o c°Oo o^ ^ U ^ ^^ n U^°m oMO U oOo oro oOOO rn U rn rn rnLU v vvv^^^ v w^ v^'t w v v v w v v v^ w ;T

W ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ M 01- 0-1 M a Q^w^ w W W w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w

^ 0 c^ 0 a U 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 u) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fn w O x x w x x m m m O M M M oC O oC w w O w w w w O ^ m wO 0 n. O O O O O O O O a O o O 0 a O O O a O O O O n O O O

tiS ^ ^ 0 0 0 0 ^ ^ ^Q ^ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q^ < Q -^

z ^ o wi^ wi^ uwi cwn 0 wi^0 W 0 0 uWi 0 o 0 v^i 0 c0i^ vW i c^n ^^ 0 c^n

m 0 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 0 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

} } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } >-^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ M cr C^ ^Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q^ U) U) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ U) U) ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ w U)U)U)

U) g w 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2i :^i 1E :E 2 2 w< O r. O O O O o O O O= o O o 0= O O O= O O O O= o o OU U U .U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U

rr chr ^ 0'' °' ^

O oO O N m LO LO 0 CO M O !f) (O C) N O O CO NO Q) 00 Q) CJ C) N O 00

O N O M_ CO V M (O O CD m C) C) if) O V C) C) N I`- O O) I- I, 00 C) OO C) NC) C') C) LO 00 N LO DO O M O O N tn I, C) N LO O I^ tt N O 0) N CON O) M N M ^t CO I- 00 O C) V lf) CO I, C) 6) O M f`") lf) I- 00 M CM tf) (O

CD Cfl (D CO CO (O I- I^ N 1, 1- I- I, N N. 00 00 N 00 00 00 O N O d) O^V V V r -t d- ^ V r V' V V r V V' V ^ r d' V' d'

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

O O O O C) O C) O O O C) C) C) C) O C) C) O C) O O C) O O O O O O ON N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

M 00 ) N Q I.n N 6(") 4 ^ N -7 O N 4 N O CO O) O N CO d' O O MN O O r N N O r r N O r r r r r r N o r N M O r

NO O O O O C) C) O O O O O O O O O O O OO O C) O 00 O O O O O

aTF-'

^ N

EE

^ U

^Ocl

N

0N

N0)(00.

WUu_LL-O

Y)ii.LL u)

W ZD

c=i) OU

z

'0 co

0 _

Q

0I.

:D0

C) Lf) LOM O O

0 V U) N

OO O O O

0 ^ ^

U

C" M M M M MO

^ 0 E09 09 ^ Ef>

A ..

mU~ C N_f0m E

^ ° o °O oa °^ O^ °^0^ U 0LL

smo O

^ O O O[o o O ° O

C'9^00 VO Q

C3O

^

^a^U

NOOMNNO_

0N

00m

OO(0rnrnOO

Q^

c0Q

UN^^

E.2

nM O) COW C)p^ r d'O) O O^ Lf) Lf)

Q^ ry,W W Wp ^ 0of 0^ rr,O O O

V) U) U)LI) U) IL)

p O OU U U

^^j ^^^^^^^I:L4P^^1f ^ ^'^^w

WSVi-7' f'f;^^"Ajife---------------

^'^^r'^^^ .1^^^'^ ^^^.^'^° ^x^tl^r^ ^ ► r^,Vo ^^^ r fdJ^^ ,3j^l^

c%irs'° U, IQA,^^ FUFO--^7 IA c U ,2--2-6.s

J t ^^^•^ ^D^S f^3 r^

^ ^^t CATf

^^ 0 J^) W ^.._.._._. -

¢ (n aLo LO LO2 2 2

W ~ O O O

N Q i c: a)EE

m ^ ^ ^0 = N N N<

t^ N N N

() ^ ^ NQ f0 OOO

Z 0

PC^'

22.0 TRIAL

23.0 C

lu/maH24.0

--- /^Yb 25.0

i-

Wtfl-^

C'44,IuOV

-0

l ^ C-!^ ( !k `^^^^ ^

^.-^.

^^^ ^^ ^^

^Ie rab ^ 14

^^ ^^^^^^M po)/U A

^^t.c?o"'e5-s PJ^AA)

m

26.0

RES

K.CASE MANAGEMENT

)SURE, QU1ET TITLE A N D PARTlTdC N ACTIONS

)N CASES

RSH1P

27.0 SF[E iFF'S SAL ES

28:0 APP ALS T THE COMMON PLEAS COURT

29.0 AREUTRATION

30.0 ASSIGN ENT OF CRi iNAL CASES 4a;;;^

f'm

30.0 ASSIGNMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES

The judge presiding in the Arraignment room shall be chosen by lot and shall serve for aperiod of two weeks.

All motions for continuance will be made in writing and may only be granted by thearraignment room judge upon a showing of good cause. A second continuance may onlybe g ranted b

ythe Administrative Jud .? pr `

gned tp_a jud e by lo upon arraignment of the defendant, accord. .mAll ca s shaii be 60

1with Ie^P3 f theF3u.les.o Sup endence of the for tbe Ceurtsofi E^hio I kcer^-a randorr5 assignment of cases to^ge^sures the equitable distribution of cases

The following procedure will be used:

(A:)-A-red_ticket sJa.aU-be-drawn'i'n'afl capital cases.

^^.^

(B) Cases will be randomly assigned to the docket of a judge where the defendant has nopending case[s), is not on probation or community control at the ti Me..o^,.t4e,.off,ense,there is no co-.d^ endant[s] with a pending case or probation or e6mmunity control c^s,or the ant plead pilty at arraignment, exce t where defendant has a o '^.d

us ental iiln or is mentally retarded ane^ al rule 30.1 a(1) or (a)(2).

e a defendant has a confirmed serious mental iliness o' y re ar ed asdefined in local rule 30.1 (a)( or a , cases will be randomly assigned to judge'sdockets pursuant to local rule 30.1 (c . where a defendant's mental status is unconfirmed

p` at arraignment, t' eTi -case s a e assigned pursuant to section (b) of this rule. If a er 3arrag ignment it is determined that the case should have been assigned to a mental healthdocket, the case may be reassigned pursuant to local rule 30.1 (c)(2). ^

L^^^`^ ^s0 -(D) In capital cases where the ^ t as in open Court already made a knowing,intelligent, and voluntary w r of the right to a jury trial and has made the decision tohave a trial before a th judge panel or a plea required to be heard by a three judgepanel. The admini tive judge shall assign the remaining panel members by randomselection. If t administrative judge determines an assigned judge is unavailable, theAdministrat' e Judge will randomly select another judge to replace that judge. ^^,(E) Cases will be re-assigned to judges when: ^i^

(1) A single defendant commits a new offense while on probation or communityThe case shall then be assigned to the docket ofthe judge with such prior case.

0-

^a^c ^,Z

I I - t .^{jw €^ f CV ^^^'^ H.^E ^Ff' ^ ^lt1^t^-L - ^^^^Z5C)" ^ C ^^^c^ ^f^^^^^ ^5;^ ^

j ^ Effective 06/09/2003. Gei ^^ ^^^ K(^Yf

`

it cTfflFMM"--

^

c

http://c cuy gacounty.us/internet/localRules.aspx 17^ ^^ °^^ SG^^^^^^^^^^ 8/20/2012

Cuyahoga c;ounty uommon rieas t-ourt

-7-W

a6lmr

selection. If thAdministrative

(E) Cases will to judges when:

( 1) A single d fen nt commits a new offense while on ,Frobation or community control.

The case shall then e assigned to the docket of thejddge with such prior case.

(2) A singl defendant h s a pending case. The case shall then be assigned to thedocket of e judge with t pending case. ,,^

end^nrthis case or has co defendant[s] with a prior(3) A d endant has co defen nt[s] o

pin case , then the case sh be ,,assigned to the docket of the judge who wasassig d the pending case> If two f more defendants have pending cases, the caseshall e assigned to the docket$ t e judge with the lowest numbered case.

(4) defendant has co-de ndants wh re one co-defendant has a pending case and theoth r defendant has a^ bation or com unity control case. The case shall then beass gned to the dock t of the judge with e pending case.

(5) A defendant as co-defendant[s] where coco-defendant has a pending case but aco-defendant is on probation or community ontrol, then all defendants shall beassigned to e docket of the judge who has a -defendant on probation or communitycontrol. ere there is more than one co-defend t on probation or community control,the ca shall be assigned to the docket of the jud with the lowest numbered case.

06/09/2003.

30.1 ASSNG MN ENT OF CR1 ! AL CASES TO M ENTAL HEALTH DOCKETS

30.1 ASSIGMNENT OF CRIMINAL CASES TO MENTAL HEALTH DOCKETS.0200-- "aw- ®..-._

(A) DEFINITIONS

Mental health dockets shall include cases where the defendant has a confirmed seriousmental illness or is developmentally disabled as defined below:

(1) For purposes of this section, a defendant is deemed to have a confirmed serious 1mental illness if within the previous six months prior to arraignment, there is a clinicaldiagnosis of a severe mental illness with a psychotic feature or defendant waspreviously found eligible or was assigned to a MHCD.

(2) For purposes of this section, a defendant is deemed to be developmentally disabledif there is a clinical diagnosis that the defendant meets current DevelopmentallyDisabled Offender eligibility of an IQ of 75 or less and/or an adaptive skills deficit basedon either a diagnostic report or on the defendant previously having been found eligibleor assigned to a MHCD.

(B) APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES TO PRESIDE OVER MENTAL HEALTH DOCKETS

The Administrative Judge will select Common Pleas Court General Division judges forthe mental health dockets. The judges will serve for a period of two years from date ofassignment. Upon approval of the Administrative Judge, the judges may be reappointedto successive terms. Thereafter, any Common Pleas Court General Division Judges whodesire to preside over a mental health docket may submit their names to theAdministrative Judge for consideration.

lwf fct/^f ^- ^^^^°'^!/

(C) ASSIGNMENT OF CASES TO MENTAL HEALTH DOCKETS ^?^

(1) Exc t as otherwise provided for in paragraph ( D) of this rule, at the arraignmentthere will be a random assignment of mental health cases to judges presiding over themental health dockets. Assignments will occur through a process either manual orelectronic, which ensures the equitable distri ution of cases among mental healthdockets where the defendant:

1 L6^^. J Vl T

ministrative j determines an assigned judge is unavailable, thege will randomly select another judge to replace that judge.

http://cp.cuyahogacounty.us/internet/localRules.aspx 11/19/2012

Cuyahoga County Common Yleas c:our>;

^) 6^ ;^(a) Based on either a new psychiatric assessment or on past placement on a MLH_CD,

I ^ has a co irmed serious mental illness or is developmen at^y disabled as defined in A

(1) and 2) above; and

A b) Has no pending case[s], is not on probation or community controt at the time ofhe offense, or there is no co-defendant[s] with a pending case or probation or

community control cases.

(2) In cases where 't is d rmined after arraignment that a defendant has a confirmedserious mental ilfne is developmentaliy disabled as defined in A(1) or A(2) above,

^^ft the Administrative ge may reassign the case to a mental health docket through

random assign t.

(D) CASES WILL NOT BE ASSIGNED TO MENTAL HEALTH DOCKETS WHEN:ro(1) A single defendant commits a new offense whlle on probation or community controlThe case sha I then be assigned to the docket of the judge with such prior case.^(2) A single defendant has a pending case. The case shall then be assigned to the

docket of the judge with the pending case.

(3) A defendant has co-defendant[s] on this case or has co-defef^dant[ with`a prior

pending case, then the case shall be assigned to the docket of the jud e who was

assigned the pending case. If two or more defendants have pending ses, the case

shall be assigned to the docket of the judge with the lowest numberd case.

s^^(f^`^^l (4) A defendant has co-defendants where one co-defendant has a ending case and the

other defendant has a probation or community control case. The se shall then be

assigned to the docket of the judge with the pending case.

(5) A defendant has co-defendant[s] where no co-defendant has a pending case but a

co-defendant[s] is on probation or community control, then allldefendants shall be

(^^ G assigned to the docket of the judge who has a co-defendant on probationor community

, -y control. Where there is more than one co-defendant on prob,ation or community control,

the case shall be assigned to the docket of the judge with th'e lowest numbered case. 4 ^

^(, ^0 Effective: 06/09/2003

Amendments to (A), (A)(1), (A)(2), (C)(1)(a) and (C)(2), effective 2/04/10( p^ `

F0 A&ONS' r^,^ 4 17^-,Vz;,rL

^^j f^ ^f h^^ ^^, ^Pub^^^a- ^^^ ^,^^f ^ c 3 r^S^^-- _....... __..._ __...._....... ............. __........._.._._...._._..._.._.....___

30.2 ASSIGN E 3' OF C 6 A1. CASES Tor ^G COURT DOCKETS

31.0 GRAND JURY 004^A7A

32.0 P A7ION DEPART E T

^33.0 ASSIGN MENT AND COM PENSATION OF COU NSEL TO a^FEND

34.0 BAIL AN D RECOC^ IZA CE

35.0 SELECTION AND GOVERNA NCE OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS 14f /ji'^ (^ ` )^

3 .^ 36.0 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ARBITRATION

37.0 M EDIA^,^^

'^^^ ^ Nor( 4^1 OLi^^

Sc"+,°gu 38.0 ^PEC9AL. ^^^^^^^ ^^RV^^

^OOC^^ <S

O, ^ ^^^ 1ltzp^Home Judaes Jurv Dutv Court ocket Local Rules Re-Entrv Couk Amendments Mental Health Contact Us News 8 Employment

Form Publications ADR Department Foreclosure Foreclosure Mediation Notarv

L711/19/2012

http://cp.cuyahogacounty.us/intemet/localRules.aspx

Cuyahoga County IMN JIG^"^f _

T-''^m. •!l .: ! A...«.^y,'„r^` . ,^ . '51.... .. ^^^:^^:i I ^ F ^ SA - ` ..

^... • .G. «^ '^. } ..^.-...-.ti...,,^

l^ ^ ^C ^ •"^ 4^ ^ .. ^ ^'^r ^-' ^.. yi t '. if.i't.-^' ^ . ..

_ ...« . s^..^^. . .

:..,. - , ^ .._r`.. ,..^^ . . .. i ... ......... ._. .. ^ 1. ..^.... . ....

C L1 ^'A C^ N T `>' C. : M iV { r C^I P LE ASC(D U R T... ........... ....,-. .... .. ...... ........ .... .... . .. ... . . vrv ....-...,_.e.®^ _.^y .

elopmental Disability C^rt (MHDD)Organized in 1807, cuyah°ga Mental He7!o rmerlyCaunty, is the most popLIlaus Menta l Health Court Dk2t

county in Oh3o. As of the 2010census its population was

1,280,122.

® Home

® Judges

Jury Duty n^^^

Court Docket ^ 9 ^^

NJ Local Rules

Mi Local Rule Amendments

® Re-Entry Court

® Mental Health

® Contact Us

® News & Employment

Forms & Publications

Departments

Clerk of Courts

(M Login

Cuyah ga CountyCourt af mmon Pleas

1200 tario St.Cteveland, O ^0 441 1 8-16;

Mission Statement

The mission of the Mental Health Court is to promoteearly identification of defendants with severe mentalhealth/developmental disabilities in order to promote

coordination and cooperation among law enforcement,jails, community treatment providers, attorneys and the

courts for defendants during the legal processand achieve outcomes that both protect society and

support the mental health care and disability needs ofthe defendant.

Rules

HB 86 - Tr tment in Li of ConvictionThe newly en ted HB 8 effective September 30, 2011,expands eligibi y for eatment in lieu of conviction(ORC 2951.041)o ' clude "offender whose mentalillness or intellect` I disability contributed to theiroffense". The e ct pact on the MHDD Court isundetermined t this ,' _ e..However--additiorralassessments determina 'ons and supervis^on responses^°will qbvious . be required.

County Wide Mental Health_..^„_„,- Initiative

Mental Health Developmental Disability Court Judges

Jose A Vilianueva Chair

(((^^^/'y^ Judge Michael P. Donnelly

Judge Hoilie L. Gallagher

Judoe John D. Sutula

Judge Joan Synenberg

Mental Health Developmental Disability Court Staff Contact

Name

DaYiiel.,.^., PetercaMHC Co-Direi torPretrial Services Manager

Phone Numb.er / Email Address

(216) 443-2170cpdxp@cuyahogacounty.us

Q tA)^^114

p iw$(13 fM,http://cp.cuyahogacounty.us/intemet/MentalHealth.aspx

Links

Mental Health Court Docket AnnualReoort 2010

Mental Health Assigned Counsel List

Cuyahoga County-Mental HealthCourt Attorney Training

P-18/18/2012

FROM: JAMES HAYDEN INMATE,I1473-862 MARION CORRECTIONAL CAMP , MARION 0OHIO PRESENT3%5,940 Marion-WILLIAMSPORT ROAD P.O. BOX 43301 sent REGULAR UNITED STATES MAILMETER MAIL DESIGNATION # F 9704248

************* ^^TO: . • ^ ^^^

UNiTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEFEDERAL BUREAiJ OF INVESTIGATION

QAWASHINGTON D.C. COMPLAINT

/^^ ************* UNDER TITLE 42 @ 1983

CIVIL RIGHTS

ATTENTION URGENT : DIRECTOR F.B.I. ROBERT S. MUELLER III

THIS INFORMATION IS BEING SENT IN ORDER TO INITIATE AN

INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF OHIO ; IT's".DEPAR72•iENT OF REHABILITATION

& CORRECTIONS, UPPER ECHELON CO.RRUPTION OF THE JUDICIAL ;LEGISI,ATIVE ANDEXECUTIVE Bk2ANCHES OF GOVL•'It.NMI;:1T OF THE S'CA'J'E OF OH'.:ti IN VIOLATIONS OFCIVIL. RIGHTS, FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STAIU'lEf;, PUSiLIC CORrUl'TIOT?, iNrF.BSTAT);

_._.,-^._,,...._... . . 7.. A\`•.°i1 TTiA.CT'.f.l?:7''a;TTClIJ '1T'4rh,.,^^,_..Cr1^.:.R-^a ... .. 'r^^'rT, , . ._ _ ...,li P7N1;•7;ic .r2...u.p F•v,:^^n.;... r : _ ,.. r .AR;) IZiPEDEt:E.iT !LU. UNITED STATES MAIL, AOIt PiJRPOSE TO ll"R1V,T.:_C'v +L ^TSOF THE CITIZENRY OF THE STATE OF OHIO A1I^T-T119fSF-CIT2'LENS OF THE UNITEf) STATES

PA' UP L HIGLIW YS WITHIN TD:•; S_"ATE OF OHIO AND ARE SO SUBJECTTO THE LAWS OF THE STATE.OF OHIO.WHILE'TRAVELING UPON PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES

OF THE UNITED STATES. FURTHER. RL•'QUEST U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE ENFO:LCEMWTSECTION INVOLVEMENT IN INVESTIGATION.(ORIGINAL EVIDENCE OF VIOLATION IN JEOPARJY.)

OHIOs'INMATE GRIEVANCE PROCEDEDDR' GARNERED CERTIFICATION THROUGH

AUSPICES.OF THE UN TA1ES DEPARTMENT USTICE, PURSUANT TO OHIO

ADMINISTRA•^ . OLICY AT 201, 203 ,202 OHIO AD^ISTRATIVE[.CODE.

GRIE CE PROCEDURE IS FRAUGHT WI 'REPRISAL AND SERIOUS.•BREACH OFOF WORST FORM. 7

IHAVE EVIDENCE(NOW IN JEOPARDY.OF CONFISCATZQNr.AND.DES:fRUCT.ION.i BY'.:THE:STASE

^F dH^O} TMN ^'1^^3^* ;^"D bII^jC^NY.?^L4TTIj :?PO I^^^'^^ ^l^TFIi ^Ias^iN^^Sfi1T0F i12TITED S7.iATE9 lIA11. DIRECTLY IN VIO'LATION OZ' F.'^ER^IL fiLATUTEE, ANfS DIRECTLYRESULTS IN LOSS OF RIGI^T TO APPEAL BY IINLAWFUL INTERIlERENCE WITH ACCESS TOTHE COURT jLE-FFDF..RAI_L AG S ON.. A

MASSIVF. STAT SCALE ENCOMPASSING THOUSANDS OF UNITEDT-STATES GITIZENSIN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAWS. T}LqVE LEG]TiMATE REASON A?'P CAUSE TO SHOw

Of Y'MS Z.dIJ5 Iid A YiIRPJSI:7''iTI^°.GirSFinACY via MASS SCAi.E Tv ilr'CLii.Ciuu:TiE `Ui.T.'•.TDDES IFI DIR: CT :'IvIATI?:: C'.'..,.._,

I 13AVE EVIDENCE(NOW IN JEOPARL)Y)TH.AL SROWS THE STATES'JUDICIALBRANCH OF GOVIMNMENT of OHIO ALTE'nF.D ITs' OWN LE6ISLATION BY A.BLATANTJUDICIAL OVERRIDE OF THE STATES' penalt.ies and sentencing STATUTE ATORIO REVISED CODE TIT1E;29.r.;.CHAPTER 29 at SECTION 2929.15B. THE ALTERATIONWAS CREATED IN THE EICHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIOJUDGE ROCCO.TH.E CASE REFERED^.TO IS OHIO VS VIRASAYACIIACK.IT HAS CONTROLLINGINFLUENCE THROUGHOUT THE STATE JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF OHIO , AS WELL AS

OVERRIDE WITHIN MASS PRODUCED LAW REVIEW REFERENCE BOOKS SEE: BALDWINS @.PENALTIES AND SENTENCING 2003. THE STRANGE THING IS, THAT,THIS OVERRIDE

OF RATIFIED LEGISLATION WAS DEPICTED AS A SIMPLE TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR

YET THAT WAS OVER FOUR YEARS AGO AND THE STATUTE STILL READS AS RATIFIED

NOT ALTF.RED,YET THE CONTROLLING INFLUENCE OF THE VIRASAYACHACK CASE IS

PREPONDERANT AS THE CASE WHICH CONTROLS IMPRISONMENT FOR INITIALLYIMPOSED NON-p.Tison penalties ,r„TME:ALTERATION,BY MAKING A NON-EXISTANTTYPOGRAPHICAL;THE PREDOMINANT CONTROLLING I4ETHOD OF IMPRISONMENT IS RULED

V (LY BY THE MERE INFLIJENCE of this CONTROLLING CASE,WHICH INDCED IS NOT A TYPO^" ^ (THE TYPO IS OVER FOUR YEARS OLD) YET THE^^TYPO"ALTERS THE STATUTE TO

SEND CITIZENS OF THE iJNTTFO STATES TO PRISON,WHEREAS THE LEGISLAThD RFTIEIED*STATUTE AS WRITTEN (AS STILL REMAINS WidI1'TEN (AS i'1 .caas klc+'f:CEN 1H:EL41-...... . _._._.-^ . , : ^ ... "^ _ -X^ ^ ^,-^,.:-^:x,. , ^ , , _•^,^^s._.._.'i^r ^ *+^Oro `r•^I rST<'' ?T".AI;fJs.tATICi2iOF THE RP_TIFIED ETIAt,TTD LEGISLATION GAUSL•S CIVIL ►tIGHTS VIOLATIONS DJE TO;*IF NOT FOR THE FACT OF THIS "CHANGE" AS THEY GALL/CALLED IT IN THE*VIRASAYACHACK,RULING.;MASS-QUANTITIES OF PERSONS NOT OTHERWISE IMPRISONABLE,BY THE RATIFIED ENACTED LEGISLATED LAW. THIS CHANGE CORRUPTS ALL

OTHER ASPECTS OF THE LEGISLATION TO THE DETRIMENT OF THOSE PERSONS OTHERWISEAFFORDED 1MM LIBERTY IF NOT FOR THE CORRUPT ALTERATION,

[AS IT WOULDALSO SEEM THAT THIS CHANGE WAS BASED ON THAT CASES/OWN OUTCOME

WHICH COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVi, EXISTED UNTIL AFTER THE RULING, YET THE REFERENCE

THE COURT MAKES TO GIVE THE CASE iTRIT IS THIS SAME CASE.IT COULD NOT POSSIBLYHAVE EXISTED IN ORDER TO "TAP" ITs' overriding 'authority' (lower case letters) .AS THE SAME AUTHORITY THEY TAP TO GIVE VIRASAYACHACK ITS' merit was indeedVARASAYACHACR ITSELF. OR SO IT WOULD APPEAR.TENS OF TROUSANDS OF UNLAWFULLY INCARCE 1ED PERSONS-F@R-..F3AUDULENT PROCUREMENT OF FEDERAL SUBSIDI FOR TIIE PRISON SYSTEM,IN OHIO ? ^1OVER,AT MINIMAL.IAN EIGHT YEAR SPAN OF TIME. oNLYCTATF FFAT TCCT mm.m ......._ -.- --. '

^ .. ._. . ,:. .. . . .

...THAT THE STATE REALISED WHEN IT ENACTED ITS' LEGISLATION, IT SOON REALISED,FISCALLY THIS LEGISLATION WOULD INDEED CURTAIL FEDERAL SUBSIDIES FOR EACH

SEQUENTIALLY NUI3.BERED INMATE, AS THIS LEGISLATION (STATUTE 2929. O.R.C.) ^HOLDS MINIMALISATION OF SENTENCING AS IT's MAIN COMPONENT SUBJECT:MINIMALISATION OF PRISON TERMS. ^^

I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THE STATE OF OHIO CONSPIRED BETWEEN ITS' THRNCHESOF STATE GOVERNMENT TO FRAUDULENTLY PROCURE FEDERAL BUDGET DOLLARSEBYRVIRTUE

OF IMPOSING PRISON TERMS AND LONGER DURATION PRISON TERMS , FOR PURPOSE OFBRINGING "NUMBERS OF STATE PRISONF.RS INTO NEW FISCAL TERMS, NOT ONLY BY THE

STATUTE ALTERATION , BUT ALSO BY AFFDRDING THROUGH THE.TYPOGRA1?HICA,L,.:FRAUD

;JURISDICTION TO THE STATE OF OHIO PAROLE AUTHORITY WffICH THE STATUTE [AS WRITTEN]HAD NO INTENT TO AFFORD SUCH RECIPROCATING POWERS TO RETURN PRISONERS TOPRISONS WHEN THE STATUTE, AS RATIFIED NEVER ALLOWED SUCH AFFECT.

IHAVE EV,IDENCE TH?,T THE STATE OF OHIO ALTERED_.ITS' OWN RAT1FLED LEGISLATION_ _. T_N VIOI.ATTODI O:F F'EDERAL `:TA.TL'T,F'S BY A 1',L _'r._'? T,n, ,

_...e A I`T^ , L t, I.AL OV Ri I:vi OF T:?.EFELONI SENTENCING AND PENALTIES S"PATU'fE,AT ; OHIO REVISEP CODE;

TITLE 29 CTIAPTER 29.at SECTION;:.2929.15B AND THE FRAUDULENT ALTERATION

WITHIN THAT SECTION TO';TYPO VERSION;'READ;INSTEAD OF 2929.19B3-

TO READ 2929.19BS,,WHEN IN-FACT THE STATUTE AS RATIFIED, AND REMAINS ASRATIFIED TO READ 2929.19B3 ; indeed

NOT 2929.19B5 with quite a sublimeyet.HOST SINISTER AFFECT WHICH INDEED,ENCOMPASSES VIOLATIONS OF THE

CIVIL ..2IGHTSOF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PERSONS NOT OTHERWISE IMPRISONABLE,IF NOT FOR THEUNLAWFUL JUDICIAL OVERRIDE.

I V^ ^AMES HAYDEN ^1.7

IF IT WERE NOT SO SINISTER AN EF CT IT MAY NEVER HAVE COME TO BE DISCOVERED.ON THE SURF.i4CE THE ALTERATION IS SUBL'LME , SUBTLE(ONLY ON THE SURFACE}

THE ALTERATIONS'.AFFECT ON SENATE BILL 2 THE STATUTE CREATED UNDER THE

RATIFIED SENATE BILL, WAS ALTERED BY THIS JUDICIAL OVERRIDE OF THE RATIFIEDLEGISLATION,ALLOWS THOUSANDS OF PERSONS TO BECOME IMPRISONED WITHOUT THEAUTHnR.I.TY OF IAW.

IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THE STATE OF OIiIO CONSPIRED TO FRAUDULENTLY PROCURE..FED,FRfiI.._BTlI1GET ,DOLLARS ,;,Y VT.RTUF. OF IMPOSING PRISOPI TERMS AND LONGER-DURATION

-- - __ ._._____ ..... ..: _. .^:... . .PRISON TER;•1S NOT H.AViNG BEEN ALLOWED BY RATIFICATIOIJ(only .being aiiowo:d

by corrupt,obv:ious ALTERATION NOT ALLOWED BY LAW TO BE SO ALTERED. THIS ONE

SEEMS CRIM;INALLY INTENDED (GO.ING INTO NEW FISCAL TERMS PROCURING MORE UN-

ENTITLED FEDERAL SUBSIDIES (DOLLARS) BY APPARANT ORGANIZED CONCERTATION

BETWEEN THE STATES"THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERMENT IN CONSPi1RACY,BY VIRTUE

OF IMPOSING PRISON TERMS NOT ENACTED INTO LAW , WITH PURPOSE TO CONCEAL

[MANIFEST UNCdNSTITUTIONALITY] WITHIN THE FINALIZED RATIFIED STATUTE.

AND FURTHER,BY DESTGN;..with FURPO.SE TO ASSZGN INMATE SEQUENTIAL INTAKE

NUMBERS FOR UNLAWFUL PROCURMENT OF FEDERAL SUBSIDIES AND TO FURTHER

INFLATE NUMBERS TABULP.TION CONTRARY TO LAW [SOME NUMBERS)[PROBABLE]-AS BEING

ASSSIGNED TO NON-EXISTANT PERSONS), WITH PURPOSE BY CONSPIRitiGY,TO ASSIGNSEQUENTIAL INMATE NUMBERS TO THOSE PERSONS NOT OTHERWISE IMPRISONABLE

BY THE ENACTED LEGISLATION.(MAY FURTHER INVOLVE ASSIUNMENT OF PER PERSONCOUNT NUMBERS TO PERSONS NOT REAL NOR EXISTANT);ACTING IN CONCERT TO DEPRIVECITIZENRY OF THIER CIVIL RIGHT TO LIBERTY,;POSED SOLELY AS RE60TiTTOErT1TEr

ADULTERATION VIA ALTERATION (THOUGH SOPHISTICATED AND INTRICATE) PROVABLE

NEVERTHELESS , THAT, THE STATE OF OHIO IS ACTING IN CONCERT VIA ITS' 3

BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT, TO PURPOSELY DEPRIVE ITS' CITIZENRY OF THIER

CIVIL RIGHTS INVIOI.ATION OF LAWS OF THE GOVERNMENT.. OF THE UNITED STATES

AND ITS'Cot:stitution for purpose to procure iederal subsidie„ BY THIS CORRUPT_^L.....t•.T..^._.'S._A1 ,..,.-,r,.,.,v^ . prnrnT,FMPn?T-r1r..._Fi:DEEA^ L

DOLLARS NOT OTHERWISE L'A4JFU'LLYnENTITLED from THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF®MERICA..,iJHERE THAT MONEY GOES MAY HAVE NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERPiS UNiLNOWN DUE TOTHE SHEAR NUMBERS BE-ING CAUSE OF CONCERN USING LO7,d'ESTILTfSTES; resulting in,OVERONE BILLION DOLLARS IN,FRAUL►.ULANT PROCUREMENT BY DECEPTION AND CONCEALMENT ATTREMENDOUS COST TO CITIZENRY OF THIER CIVIL RIGHTS IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 42@ 1983 'IJN33'ED.STATES CODE. IT IS MY TRUE AND HONEST BELIEF THA2 I HAVEDISCOVERED MAJOR CORRUPTION OF THE HIGHEST FORM THAT MAY RESULT IN THE

INTEGRITY OF OUR COUNTRY.OF TiiE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO BE AT JEOPARDYBY I.NFLUENCES UIdDER THE GUISE OF LEGITMATE AFFAIRS..OF STATE GOVERNMENT.

^J^^^^^