16
Dynamics of a Ratio- Dynamics of a Ratio- Dependent Predator-Prey Dependent Predator-Prey Model with Nonconstant Model with Nonconstant Harvesting Policies Harvesting Policies Catherine Lewis and Benjamin Leard August 1 st , 2007

Dynamics of a Ratio- Dependent Predator-Prey Model with Nonconstant Harvesting Policies Catherine Lewis and Benjamin Leard August 1 st, 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Dynamics of a Ratio-Dynamics of a Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey Dependent Predator-Prey Model with Nonconstant Model with Nonconstant

Harvesting PoliciesHarvesting PoliciesCatherine Lewis and Benjamin Leard

August 1st, 2007

Predator-Prey ModelsPredator-Prey Models• 1925 & 1926: Lotka and Volterra independently

propose a pair of differential equations that model the relationship between a single predator and a single prey in a given environment:

x rx axy

y bxy cy

Variable and Parameter definitionsx – prey species populationy – predator species populationr – Intrinsic rate of prey population Increasea – Predation coefficientb – Reproduction rate per 1 prey eatenc – Predator mortality rate

Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey ModelModel

(1 )axy

x x xy x

bxyy dy

y x

Parameter/Variable Definitionsx – prey populationy – predator populationa – capture rate of preyd – natural death rate of predatorb – predator conversion rate

Prey growth term Predation term

Predator death term Predator growth term

Previous ResearchPrevious Research

(1 )axy

x x x hy x

bxyy dy

y x

Harvesting on the Prey Species

First GoalFirst Goal

( )H x hx

( )hx

H xc x

Analyze the model with two non-constant harvesting functions in the prey equation.

1.

2.

Second GoalSecond GoalFind equilibrium points and

determine local stability.

Model One: Constant Effort Model One: Constant Effort HarvestingHarvesting

(1 )axy

x x x hxy x

bxy y d

y x

• The prey is harvested at a rate defined by a linear function.•Two equilibria exist in the first quadrant under certain parameter values.• One of the points representscoexistence of the species.•Maximum Harvesting Effort = 1

Bifurcations in Model OneBifurcations in Model One

Hopf Bifurcation

Transcritical Bifurcation

Connecting OrbitsConnecting Orbits

Model Two: Limit HarvestingModel Two: Limit Harvesting

(1 )axy hx

x x xy x c x

bxy y d

y x

• The prey is harvested at a rate defined by a rational function.• The model has three equilibria that exist in the first quadrant under certain conditions.• Again, one of the points represents coexistence of the species.

Bifurcations in Model TwoBifurcations in Model Two

Bifurcation Diagram

ConclusionsConclusions

• Coexistence is possible under both harvesting policies.

• Multiple bifurcations and connecting orbits exist at the coexistence equilibria.

• Calculated Maximum Sustainable Yield for model one.

Future ResearchFuture Research

• Study ratio-dependent models with other harvesting policies, such as seasonal harvesting.

• Investigate the dynamics of harvesting on the predator species or both species.

• Study the model with a harvesting agent who wishes to maximize its profit.

Real World ApplicationsReal World Applications

Questions?Questions?