18
Driving Improvement and Efficiency in Culture Services Trust Workshop The Dome, Doncaster 17 th March 2011

Driving Improvement and Efficiency in Culture Services Trust Workshop The Dome, Doncaster 17 th March 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Driving Improvement and Efficiency in Culture Services

Trust Workshop

The Dome, Doncaster

17th March 2011

Welcome and Introductions

Project supported by:

Structure of the Workshop

1:30pm Welcome and Introductions

1:40pm Overview of the Improvement and Efficiency Project and discussion on the landscape of sport and leisure

trust provision

2.00pm John Sherburn, Leisure Services, Doncaster Council

2.30pm Michael Woodward, Commercial Director, York Museums Trust

3.00pm Shirley Collier, Chief Executive, Scarborough Museums Trust

3.30pm Alternative service delivery models – considerations, problems and pitfalls

4.00pm Questions to the panel

4:15pm Next Steps and Close

Driving Improvement & Efficiency in Culture Services project

Project Remit:

To drive the improvement and efficiency agenda;

To increase understanding and demonstration of the value of culture services;

To identify long term improvements in culture services and cost reductions;

To research and share good practice and solutions for long-term improvements; and

To identify quick wins, long-term improvements and opportunities for joined-up service delivery.

Driving Improvement & Efficiency in Culture Services project

Exploring:

Establishing shared museum services

Establishing shared library services

Establishing shared arts services

Establishing or extending a leisure trust

Driving Improvement & Efficiency in Culture Services project

Progress:

Update consultation with councils on their priorities and aspirations for culture services

Research on national emerging practice and models Generic workshop for councils held in January 2011 Culture Network meeting held in February 2011 Bespoke assignments with a number of councils, including:

- East Riding of Yorkshire Council & Hull City Council (shared museum services)

- Calderdale Council (sport and active recreation)

- Yorkshire Libraries and Information (shared library services)

Dissemination of guidance documents

The Landscape for Sport and Leisure Trusts

A Brief History of Leisure Trusts

A Trust is a non profit distributing organisation (NPDOs)

May or may not have charitable status

First Leisure Trust was in Harlow in 1960

A small number of others followed but most local authorities preferred to keep direct control of the services

More recent activity

As a response from some authorities to CCT more Trusts created in the 1990’s

Reasons – as a response to difficult financial times

Reason – preserve a social welfare orientation as opposed to commercialisation of leisure services

Often small covering one local authority area

Why a Trust?

Financial benefits

NNDR and VAT

Growth of income, less reliant on Council subsidy

Transfer of risk

Community benefits

Trustees and local connections

May access grants not accessible to councils and provide additional funding

Trusts in the 21st Century

Trusts emerging with wider service remit

Trusts growing in number

Trust operating over multiple sites increasing

Private sector providers offer Trust vehicles

Financial climate encouraging development of more facilities managed by trusts

A Bigger Future for Trusts?

Opportunities for new and expanded trusts

Quality standards and positive partnering track record built up

What are the key issues and procedures?

Pitfalls

Benefits

Over to our presenters!

Trust Models

Partially externalised service- some aspects of a service are contracted out to a private contractor or trust (e.g. single arts venue or leisure centre)

Fully externalised service- all culture and sport provision is transferred to a private contractor or trust at one go. This can include buildings and assets as well as services such as sports development and arts development

Hybrid model- formation of a trust who then partially or fully contract out the service to an external management company for an agreed contract period.

Independent voluntary trust- similar to partially/fully externalised service but may focus on managing and delivering services and projects rather than a building

Considerations, problems and pitfalls

Trusts as a panacea? Is in-house still feasible?

Focusing on finance v focus on quality services

Customer insight and responding to demand & need

Length of Council funding agreement

Proliferation of Trusts within a Council boundary

Cross boundary competition and delivery

Trust rationalisation, merger, collaboration and sharing

Does the community understand/care about the distinction between Council and Trust?

Communities of Practice, www.communities.idea.gov.uk

MLA Research and Evidence database http://research.mla.gov.uk/case-studies/

Arts Council case studies www.artscouncil.org.uk/browse/?content=casestudy

Yorkshire and Humber Improvement and Efficiency Partnership www.yohrspace.org.uk/

Nalgao www.nalgao.org/news.php

CLOA www.cloa.org.uk/

Society of Chief Librarians www.goscl.com/

Museums Association www.museumsassociation.org/home

The Institute for Sport, Parks and Leisure (ISPAL) www.ispal.org.uk/

Sporta www.sporta.org

From each other…..

Where do I find out more?

Questions for the Panel

Next Steps

Production of guidance document on Trusts

Facilitating sharing of practice across the region

LGYH programme 2011/12

Contact DetailsAndy Parkinson Colin MitchellERS Transforming CultureMilburn House 1 Ayton Court, Bedlington, Dean Street NorthumberlandNewcastle upon Tyne NE22 6NSNE1 1LE

Tel: 0191 244 6103 Tel: 01670 827598 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.ers.org.uk www.transformingculture.co.uk