Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DRAFT
Spring 2017
Drive to Degree: The Evolution of
Academic Advising in Higher Education
DRAFT
2
Academic Advising Primary Research
Tyton Partners leads a research and action collaboration for academic advising
reform
• Through our Drive to Degree initiative, we have launched three surveys focused on the
roadmap to academic advising reform:
2015 two-part series Driving Toward a Degree: The Evolution of Planning and
Advising in Higher Education
• Part 1: The Supplier Landscape
• Part 2: Roadmap for Institutional Adoption
• http://tytonpartners.com/library/driving-toward-a-degree-the-evolution-of-
planning-and-advising-in-higher-education/
2016 Driving Toward a Degree: Establishing a Baseline on Integrated Approaches
to Planning and Advising
• http://drivetodegree.org
• Blog: Advising Reform Roadmap Blog Series: Coordination (Part 3) from
January 18, 2017
2017 two-part series Drive to Degree: The Evolution of Academic Advising in
Higher Education
o April 2017
DRAFT
3
2017 Drive to Degree Research Objectives
Refine measurement baseline and progress of market metrics related to availability, awareness and adoption of academic advising initiatives
Measure the evolution of institutional segments and generate academic advising use-cases for these segments
Complete supplier landscape assessment to identify feature set innovation
1
2
3
Sources: Tyton Partners Analysis
DRAFT
4
2016 Survey Respondents Demographic Summary: Demographics &
Institutional Size/Type
10%
0%
20%
80%
70%
100%
90%
40%
30%
60%
50%
SourceInstitutional TypeInstitutional Size
Four-Year
Private
39%
Under 1,000 13%
Two-Year
38%
Four-Year
Public
23%
20,000+
7%
NACADA
31%
NACAC
7%
MDR
57%
NASPA 4%
1,000-5,000
53%
10,000-20,000
11%
5,000-10,000
16%
Sources: Tyton Partners Analysis
Survey Respondents by Demographics, Institutional Size, Institution Type
Size/Type: n = 1,096
DRAFT
5
2016 Survey Respondents Demographic Summary: Functional Area and
Title
50%
20%
90%
0%
10%
30%
40%
100%
60%
80%
70%
Functional Area Years in PositionTitle
1 to 3
24%
Provost, Vice Provost,
or Vice President
19%
Dean
16%
Faculty with Advising 5%
Advisor/Counselor 10%
Director of Advising/
Advising Admin
22%
Director
(Other)
15%
16 to 20
7%
6 to 9
17%
10 to 15
14%
4 to 5
15%
Other
13%
More than 20
12%
Academic Program/Dept.
9%
Research 5%
Undergraduate Studies 3%
Academic
Advising/Tutoring
24%
Student Services
22%
Other
13%
Less than 1
9%
Admissions 3%
Enrollment Management
9%
Student Affairs
12%
Sources: Tyton Partners Analysis
Survey Respondents by Functional Area, Title, and Years in Position
n = 1,096
DRAFT
Ways to improve our response rate:
Insightful questions
Describe the models, approaches, activities, measurements, values,
priorities, barriers, and uses of technology at your institution
No word limit
Several text box responses included
Type __ words per minute and include your contextual perspective
Forwarding feature
Share this survey with colleagues at your institution whose
perspectives you would like to include
6
2017 Survey Goal: More Institutional and Individual Survey Respondents
DRAFT
7
2017 Drive to Degree Includes Four Phases, Extending Through April
Phase 1:
Dec.
• Define Research Objectives and Partnership
o Confirm and align research objectives with BMGF and NACADA
o Identify and vet other potential partners for the project
Phase 2:
Dec. – Feb.
• Survey Preparation and Supplier Landscape Assessment
o Prepare for survey launch, including incorporating partner feedback and sample testing
o Assess market size and growth, supplier segmentation, and market trends and dynamics for the advising technology and services market
Phase 3:
Mar.
• Survey Launch, Research and Analysis
o Administer survey, analyze results, and develop preliminary recommendations
Phase 4:
Apr.
• Synthesis of Findings and Market Dissemination
o Develop and publish document with findings
o Broad dissemination of findings, including web-based and social media, conferences and webinars, articles and blog posts, and other mediums
DRAFT
8
Roadmap to an Ideal Advising Situation
Sources: Tyton Partners Analysis
DRAFT
9
Contact Information
http://tytonpartners.com
http://drivetodegree.org
Gates Bryant
Partner
Nicholas Java
Principal
Jonathan Hornstein
Senior Associate
NACADA Executive OfficeKansas State University2323 Anderson Ave, Suite 225Manhattan, KS 66502-2912Phone: (785) 532-5717 Fax: (785) 532-7732e-mail: [email protected]
© 2017 NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising
The contents of all material in this presentation are copyrighted by NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising, unless otherwise indicated. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of an original work prepared by a U.S. or state government officer or employee as part of that person's official duties. All rights are reserved by NACADA, and content may not be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, published, or transferred in any form or by any means, except with the prior written permission of NACADA, or as indicated below. Members of NACADA may download pages or other content for their own use, consistent with the mission and purpose of NACADA. However, no part of such content may be otherwise or subsequently be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, published, or transferred, in any form or by any means, except with the prior written permission of, and with express attribution to NACADA. Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law and is subject to criminal and civil penalties. NACADA and NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising are service marks of the NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising
NACADA’S RESEARCH AGENDA
The impact of advising on students and institutions . . .
The context of advising . . .
The theoretical basis of advising development and practice . . .
Scholarship that matters
• From palatable to unsavory
• Builds capacity within and “outside” the advising community
• Advances the profession
What is unique about the work of this Center?
Scholarship with a clear focus:
Academic Advising AND
Student Success
Research
Teaching
Service
Two main areas for instruction:
•Research Skills• Designs and Methods
•Scholarly (analytic) Writing• Structure and Support
Research & Creative Endeavors
• Related Literature
• Original Research
• Partnerships
• External Funding
Broad Scope of Designs and Lenses
• Clearinghouse for research-focused literature (repository for anchor literature)
• Cadre of “Critical Friends” (methodologists and content experts)
• Facilitators - Help with finding collaborators, funders, and serve the membership in all things related to inquiry….we all benefit
Service
How will YOU be involved?