Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION DERRY BRITANNIA
DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
for:
MATTAMY HOMES
by:
LGL Limited environmental research associates
APRIL 2020
LGL FILE TA8851
Tree Management Plan
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION DERRY BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS
LIMITED
TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN
prepared by:
Digital signature Digital signature
Martin O’Halloran SENIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE
TECHNOLOGIST, ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST
Karen Chung, Hons.B.Sc., GIS Cert. GIS ANALYST
LGL Limited environmental research associates
445 Thompson Drive, Unit 2 Cambridge, Ontario N1T 2K7
Tel: 519-622-3300 Fax: 519-622-3310 Email: [email protected]
URL: www.lgl.com
Version History: Date: May 29, 2019 Version: 1 – Draft June 11, 2019 2 – Final January 10, 2020 3 – Draft Plan Revised Final April 14, 2020 4 – Final
APRIL 2020
LGL PROJECT TA88510
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 6136 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 5 4.3 6168 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 5 4.4 6252 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 5 4.5 6302 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 5 4.6 6314 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 5 4.7 6596 Ninth Line ............................................................................................................................................ 6 4.8 Species at Risk .............................................................................................................................................. 6
5.0 Proposed Plan........................................................................................................................................ 6 5.1 North Draft Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 6 5.2 South Draft Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 6
6.0 Impact Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Tree Removals .............................................................................................................................................. 6 6.2 Tree Protection ............................................................................................................................................ 7
7.0 City of Mississauga Requirements .......................................................................................................... 8 8.0 Boundary Trees...................................................................................................................................... 9 9.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 9 10.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 10 11.0 Disclaimer............................................................................................................................................. 11
11.1 Limitations of this Assessment ................................................................................................................... 11 11.2 Restriction of Assessment .......................................................................................................................... 11 11.3 Professional Responsibility ......................................................................................................................... 11 11.4 General ....................................................................................................................................................... 12
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Species Composition of Subject Lands. ................................................................................................... 4 Table 2 Removals per Species. ............................................................................................................................ 7 Table 3 Tree Replacement Requirements. .......................................................................................................... 8
LIST OF APPENDICES Figures Figure 1 Key Map
Figure 2a-2e Tree Resources Figure 3 Subject Lands Species Composition Figures 4a-4e Proposed Draft Plan and Tree Management
Appendix A Application Form Appendix B Tree Inventory Appendix C Tree Hoarding Detail
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION LGL Limited was retained by Derry Britannia Developments Limited to prepare a tree management plan (TMP) for several properties fronting Ninth Line, in the city of Mississauga. This assignment includes addresses 6136, 6168, 6252, 6302, 6314, 6432, and 6596 Ninth Line, located east of Highway 407, north of Britannia Road West, on the west side of 9th Line (Figure 1). These properties are collectively referred to as the Derry Britannia Developments Limited Subject Lands within this report.
Based on historical aerial orthoimagery analysis and recent Subject Lands investigations, the properties have been (and some are currently) utilized for agricultural purposes, particularly row crops.
Several occupied and derelict buildings are present on the Subject Lands. Ephemeral swales and ditches and remnant agricultural ponds are present on several properties. These features may be part of hazard lands regulated by Conservation Halton.
Tree resources include hedgerows, amenity trees, coniferous plantation and successional areas. Evidence of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) is quite prevalent within the Subject Lands.
2.0 BACKGROUND The City of Mississauga has enacted By-law 254-12 which regulates the injury and removal of trees on private property. The tree permit policies regulate the removal of trees greater than 15 centimetres in diameter and requires landowners to obtain a City permit to remove trees for land development. Permits may be subject to various conditions including, but not limited to, replacement planting requirements, tree preservation planning, and adequate tree protection hoarding. The City of Mississauga requires the following information for a Tree Permit to be considered a complete application:
• A completed Tree Permit/Permission application form Appendix A;
• Two copies of a plan illustrating the location and diameter of the trees to be injured or removed. The location for the trees to be injured or removed shall be illustrated by showing the distance from the property lines and buildings on the lot. In addition, the plan shall also include any new buildings or additions and those trees to be retained;
• Payment of the required fees;
• If the base of a tree straddles a property line, the written consent of the affected adjacent property owner is required; and,
• An arborist report may be required which provides details on the species, size and health of a tree to be injured, destroyed or removed. Note: If all trees are considered dead, dying or hazardous consult with the Forestry Section to determine if an arborist report is required.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 2
Relevant definitions of the By-law used in this report include:
• Boundary tree means a tree whose tree trunk, at ground level, straddles or is bisected by the property line of the lot;
• Dead means a tree that has no living tissue, or a tree which is infected by an invasive pest such as Emerald Ash Borer or Asian Long-horned Beetle as confirmed by an arborist;
• DBH means the diameter at breast height, measured outside the bark, of the trunk of a tree, measured at 1.37 metres above grade;
• Dripline means the vertical projection of the outermost edge of a tree’s canopy;
• Good Arboricultural Practices means the proper implementation of removal, renewal and maintenance activities known to be appropriate for individual trees in and around urban areas to minimize detrimental impacts on urban forest values and includes pruning of trees to remove dead limbs, maintain structural stability and balance, or to encourage their natural form, provided that such pruning is limited to the appropriate removal or not more than one-third of the live branches or limbs of a tree, but does not include pruning to specifically increase light or space;
• Hazard means a tree that is destabilized or structurally compromised such that it poses a potential safety concern to property or life;
• Healthy tree, is not defined in the City’s tree bylaw, and has been assumed to be a tree in fair or good condition within the context of this report;
• Tree means a self-supporting woody plan which will reach a height of at least 4.5 metres at maturity.
• Tree Protection Fence, in Mississauga, shall consist of 1.2 metre orange plastic fencing framed with solid top and bottom rail, or 1.2 metre plywood. This is to be installed at a minimum distance to dripline or along the edge and parallel to a tree protection zone; and,
• Tree Protection Zone is a distance from the trunk reserved for the protection of a tree’s canopy and critical root zone to provide for the viability and stability of the tree.
This report identifies tree resources and respective health characteristics for each tree. The information, interpretation and analysis contained within this Assessment are to be used solely for the purposes outlined within this Assessment. This Assessment is for the exclusive use of the client.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 3
3.0 METHODOLOGY Investigations of the Subject Lands were conducted by LGL’s ISA Certified Arborist on December 7, 2016 (6136 Ninth Line), July 24, August 1, 22, and September 18, 2018. Trees on the subject property and shared boundaries with adjacent landowners were surveyed using the following methodology for tree inventory and impact assessment:
• Species: each tree was identified to species level using common and scientific names;
• Size: diameter at breast height (DBH) was recorded in centimetres and measured 1.4 metres above ground level, consistent with International Society of Arboriculture standards. All trees measuring 15cm DBH or greater were assessed;
• Health: each tree surveyed was assigned a ranking of poor (more than 30% dead branches, weak compartmentalization, early leaf drop, presence of insects/disease, major structural defects), dead – (tree exhibits no signs of life), fair (10 - 30% dead branches, size or occurrence of wounds presents some concerns, minor structural defects) or good (dead branches less than 10%, signs of good compartmentalization, none or minor wounds, no structural defects). Note that surveys were conducted from ground level only and did not include excavation of root systems or aerial inspections of the canopy;
• On-site identification: each tree was affixed with an aluminum tag showing a unique identification number. In this case, the tag number sets 1-157, 1001-1706 were used;
• A species at risk screening (Ontario Endangered Species Act, 2007) was completed within 50 metres of the proposed work area;
• Geographic location: the location of each tree was recorded with a differential TopCon GRS1 GPS unit, and plotted in the appended figure with a horizontal accuracy of one metre but note that GPS accuracy is limited by satellite reception and is inherently prone to error. A review of the mapped locations confirms that accuracy is reasonably similar or within 1 metre in this data set. Identification numbers in the figure correspond with identification numbers in the inventory table;
• Depiction of tree resources on graphic illustrations of the Subject Lands; and,
• An impact assessment that lists trees identified for removal or protection in relation to the proposed plan has been prepared.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 4
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 OVERVIEW A total of 950 trees were assessed within the Subject Lands and their boundaries. In total, 35 species were documented, and DBH values ranged in size from 15 to 135 centimetres. Trees measuring less than 15cm were not surveyed as they are not regulated by the City of Mississauga Private Tree By-Law 254-12. Table 1 and Figure 3 present the species composition data. Detailed information pertaining to each individual tree is found in Appendix B - Tree Resources. Identification numbers found in Appendix B correspond with those found on Figure 2A-2E – Tree Resources.
Table 1 Species Composition of Subject Lands.
Common Name Quantity Comment Crabapple 1 cultural origin Dawn Redwood 1 cultural origin English Hawthorn 1 cultural origin Horsechestnut 1 cultural origin Sweet Cherry 1 cultural origin White Poplar 1 cultural origin Catalpa 1 cultural origin Ironwood 1 species of native origin Tamarack 1 species of native origin Trembling Aspen 1 species of native origin Apple 2 cultural origin Blue Spruce 2 cultural origin Corkscrew Willow 2 cultural origin Black Walnut 2 species of native origin Sugar Maple 2 species of native origin White Ash 2 species of native origin, liability increasing due to EAB Little Leaf Linden 3 cultural origin White Mulberry 3 cultural origin White Birch 3 species of native origin Scots Pine 4 cultural origin Austrian Pine 5 cultural origin Norway Maple 11 cultural origin Red Maple 11 species of native origin White Elm 13 species of native origin Black Locust 14 cultural origin White Pine 31 species of native origin Eastern Cottonwood 38 species of native origin Norway Spruce 39 cultural origin Bur Oak 51 species of native origin Eastern White Cedar
73 species of native origin
Manitoba Maple 85 invasive species Willow 92 cultural origin Silver Maple 112 species of native origin Red Ash 152 species of native origin, liability increasing due to EAB White Spruce 188 species of native origin, high representation in data set due to conifer plantation
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 5
4.2 6136 NINTH LINE The majority of the trees are clustered in the northeast corner of the property and appear to have previously surrounded a residential dwelling that is now demolished. This area is composed primarily of coniferous species that were likely planted as a windrow around the residence (Figure 2A).
Hedgerows adjacent to Ninth Line and on the north edge of the property were composed of typical hedgerow species such as Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa), Ash (Fraxinus spp.), and White Elm (Ulmus americana). Several large diameter Bur Oak, Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides), Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Ash were found throughout the site. Many of the Ash trees were in poor condition, or standing dead. Evidence of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) infestation was present in all Ash trees assessed.
Two small, constructed farm ponds currently exist on site, with an ephemeral drainage ditch/swale poorly connecting both and intersecting the property from north to south. The swale is dominated by Reed-canary Grass (Phalaris arundinaceae) and Cattails (Typha sp.) dominate the constructed farm ponds.
4.3 6168 NINTH LINE This parcel is undergoing regeneration with a prevalence of Ash trees, many of which have succumbed to Emerald Ash Borer (Figure 2B). A remnant farm pond and ditch are found on this parcel and associated with Willow and Manitoba Maple among others.
4.4 6252 NINTH LINE This parcel has several amenity trees in the front and backyard of an existing occupied house, and a row of Willows lining the ditch at the rear (southwest) of the property (Figure 2C).
4.5 6302 NINTH LINE One of the more densely treed parcels, 6302 is host to the works yard and lumber mill of an arborist company. A White Spruce plantation occurs towards the rear of the property, along with a ditch (Figure 2C). Amenity trees provide dense canopy coverage near the road frontage and surrounding the existing home and office buildings. Boundary trees; Silver Maples, existing along the east side of the driveway and may be shared with a non-participating owner (6288 Ninth Line).
4.6 6314 NINTH LINE This parcel is host to amenity trees surrounding an existing single family house and a hedgerow boundary with 6302 Ninth Line (Figure 2C).
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 6
4.7 6596 NINTH LINE This parcel is largely devoid of trees with the exception of shared boundary trees along the Ninth Line right-of-way (Figure 2E).
4.8 SPECIES AT RISK Species regulated by the Ontario Endangered Species Act (ESA, 2007) were not observed on the Subject Lands.
5.0 PROPOSED PLAN The proposed plan of subdivision includes two draft plans (April 2020); North Draft Plan and South Draft Plan (Figures 4A-4E).
5.1 NORTH DRAFT PLAN The North Draft Plan includes rear lane detached homes, rear lane townhouse, street townhouse, condo apartments/towns/stacks, residential reserve, park, buffers, and road network.
5.2 SOUTH DRAFT PLAN The South Draft Plan includes rear lane townhouse, street townhouse, condominium duplex, condo apartments, residential reserve, park/walkway/trail, stormwater management pond, greenlands, transitway and buffer, and road network.
6.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS An impact analysis has been prepared by overlaying the proposed draft plans onto the GIS tree data. Tree removal has been recommended for instances where grading, lotting, stormwater management facilities, road widening, trails, etc., conflict with tree locations and result in an anticipated impact of approximately 20% of a tree’s dripline. Trees located outside of the draft plan areas, and thus, beyond proponent ownership, have been identified for preservation. Trees within the greenlands blocks have been identified for protection, though, consultation with Conservation Halton and the proponent team is ongoing in regard to a natural heritage system plan which may affect the ability to retain some of these trees.
6.1 TREE REMOVALS A total of 649 trees are proposed for removal to facilitate implementation of the draft plans. Table 2 summarizes the quantity of tree removals by species.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 7
Table 2 Removals per Species.
Species Proposed For Removal Quantity Apple 2 Austrian Pine 4 Black Locust 13 Black Walnut 2 Blue Spruce 2 Bur Oak 24 Catalpa 1 Crabapple 1 Dawn Redwood 1 Eastern Cottonwood 30 Eastern White Cedar 53 Horsechestnut 1 Ironwood 1 Little Leaf Linden 3 Manitoba Maple 68 Norway Maple 8 Norway Spruce 39 Red Ash 144 Red Maple 10 Scots Pine 4 Silver Maple 81 Sugar Maple 2 Sweet Cherry 1 Tamarack 1 Trembling Aspen 1 White Ash 1 White Birch 3 White Elm 12 White Mulberry 3 White Pine 30 White Poplar 1 White Spruce 74 Willow 29
6.2 TREE PROTECTION Trees outside of the draft plan boundary shall be preserved, unless written authorization from the legal owner is acquired. Currently, trees not owned by the proponent are proposed for protection.
Trees within the greenlands blocks will be preserved but may be subject to alternative management pending design and consultation with Conservation Halton regarding natural heritage system design.
Tree protection specifications comply with City of Mississauga standards.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 8
7.0 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA REQUIREMENTS The City of Mississauga regulates removal of trees greater than 15cm DBH, a permit may be required prior to site alteration. Of the data set, a total of 466 trees have compensation requirements based on their health (excludes dead and poor condition trees), characteristics (excludes 6 Ash trees in fair/good condition), and size (greater than 15 cm diameter). Of those, 42 trees are larger than 50cm diameter. Appendix B lists trees which qualify for compensation.
Specific conditions on the Issuance of a Tree Permit/Permission are as follows:
a) Hoarding (a protection fence around a tree) may be required to protect trees identified for preservation during site alteration.
b) A replacement tree may be required to be planted on the property for every healthy or non-hazard tree removed. The replacement tree shall be balled and burlapped, and have a minimum diameter of 6 cm (2.4 inches). The location on the lot, number and species of the replacement tree(s) shall be to the satisfaction of Forestry. The requirement for a replacement tree may be restricted and vary depending on the size and proposed development of the property. The owner will have to provide four (4) copies of a replanting plan and a written undertaking to ensure that the replacement planning is carried out to City standards.
c) If replacement tree(s) are required, monies or a letter of credit in a form satisfactory to the City of Mississauga may be required to cover the costs of the replacement trees and the maintenance of the trees for a period of up to two (2) years at which time an inspection will be performed and the monies returned.
d) For every replacement tree not provided on site, a payment shall be required to the City’s replacement tree planting fund. The cost for each tree shall be the same as a street tree outlined in the City’s Fees and Charges By-law.
Replacement trees, or cash-in-lieu, is required for each healthy tree that is to be removed. Healthy trees between 15 and 49 cm DBH must be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. Healthy trees greater than 50 cm DBH must be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. The replacement requirements are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3 Tree Replacement Requirements.
Tree Replacement Category Proposed Tree Removals Meeting City Criteria for
Compensation
Required Tree Compensation
Trees in fair or good condition between 15 and 49 cm DBH
424 424
Trees in fair or good condition 50 cm DBH
42 84
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 9
8.0 BOUNDARY TREES The Forestry Act regulates harm to trees but also provides governance of boundary or shared property trees. In these instances, removal of boundary trees must be negotiated with neighbouring owners. Acquiring written consent from the adjacent land owner is also a condition for the permit application under the Mississauga Private Tree By-Law 254-12. The following excerpt from the Forestry Act also has particular relevance to this application:
Boundary trees
10. (1) An owner of land may, with the consent of the owner of adjoining land, plant trees on the boundary between the two lands. 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s. 21.
Trees common property
(2) Every tree whose trunk is growing on the boundary between adjoining lands is the common property of the owners of the adjoining lands. 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s. 21.
Offence
(3) Every person who injures or destroys a tree growing on the boundary between adjoining lands without the consent of the land owners is guilty of an offence under this Act. 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s. 21.
A land surveyor may be required to stake the property boundaries for trees where ownership is of concern. Areas include the Ninth Line right-of-way and boundaries with non-participating owners (i.e. 6288 Ninth Line).
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Specific recommendations for the subject property are intended to protect trees identified for preservation. Recommendations include:
• The Site Supervisor, design engineers, landscape architects shall be familiar with the City’s Tree Protection standards and understand the purpose and function of Tree Protection Zones (TPZ). In this case, Tree Protection Fence (TPF) has been recommended to avoid disturbance to the TPZ;
• Appendix B lists the recommended tree protection zone for each tree identified for protection. Appendix C provides specifications for tree hoarding required by the City of Mississauga;
• Delineation of the TPF’s shall be clearly defined on drawings and on the site;
• The tree protection hoarding/barrier must be erected prior to commencement of work;
• Any area inside the TPF must be left undisturbed (including overhead), other than the prescribed pruning;
• Construction materials or equipment are not to be stored within the TPZ of the trees;
• No signs or objects should be displayed or affixed to any retained trees;
• Disposal of liquids shall not occur within the TPZ;
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 10
• Should any incidental or accidental tree injuries occur during construction, a qualified Arborist or Town Forester/Arborist should be consulted to determine if other mitigation measures should be employed;
• For project planning and scheduling purposes, removal of vegetation should not occur between March 30 to October 1 to avoid impacts to nesting birds and summer roosting bats;
• Tree protection measures are to remain in place until all site works have been completed, at which point tree protection measures shall be removed;
• Periodic inspections of TPZ’s during construction and assessments of hazard potential post-construction should be conducted to ensure adequate protection is provided for trees identified for preservation and to ensure the risk of hazard is kept to a minimum; and,
• Trees on neighbouring non-participating properties or on the property boundary shall be left in place until such time that the ownership is confirmed or upon acquisition of written authorization for removal. In particular, trees within the Ninth Line right-of-way will require permission for removal from the City of Mississauga.
10.0 CONCLUSION Derry Britannia Developments Limited is pursuing development of the Subject Lands, an activity which requires the removal of existing trees and triggers the requirement of a Tree Management Plan and permission from the City of Mississauga under By-law 254-12.
A total of 950 trees comprised of 35 species were assessed between diameters of 15 and 135 cm DBH.
Six-hundred and forty-nine trees are proposed for removal to facilitate the draft plans. Of those, 424 qualify for compensation at a ratio of 1:1, and 42 qualify for compensation at a ratio of 2:1, for a grand total of 508 required replacement trees. The greenlands/NHS should be considered/evaluated as a placement for these trees. Landscape plans are submitted under separate cover by NAK Design.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 11
11.0 DISCLAIMER
11.1 LIMITATIONS OF THIS ASSESSMENT This Assessment is based on the circumstances and observations as they existed at the time of the site inspection of the Client’s Property and the trees situate thereon and upon information provided by the Client to LGL Limited. The opinions in this Assessment are given based on observations made and using generally accepted professional judgment, however, because trees and plants are living organisms and subject to change, damage and disease, the results, observations, recommendations, and analysis as set out in this Assessment are valid only as at the date any such testing, observations and analysis took place and no guarantee, warranty, representation or opinion is offered or made as to the length of the validity of the results, observations, recommendations and analysis contained within this Assessment. As a result, the Client shall not rely upon this Assessment, save and except for representing the circumstances and observations, analysis and recommendations that were made as at the date of such inspections. It is recommended that the trees discussed in this Assessment should be re-assessed periodically.
11.2 RESTRICTION OF ASSESSMENT The Assessment carried out was restricted to the Property. No assessment of any other trees or plants has been undertaken by LGL. LGL is not legally liable for any other trees or plants on the Property except those expressly discussed herein. The conclusions of this Assessment do not apply to any areas, trees, plants or any other property not covered or referenced in this Assessment.
11.3 PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In carrying out this Assessment, LGL Limited and any Assessor appointed for and on behalf of LGL Limited to perform and carry out the Assessment has exercised a reasonable standard of care, skill and diligence as would be customarily and normally provided in carrying out this Assessment. The Assessment has been made using accepted arboricultural techniques. These include a visual examination of each tree for structural defects, scars, external indications of decay such as fungal fruiting bodies, evidence of insect attack, discolored foliage, the condition of any visible root structures, the degree and direction of lean (if any), the general condition of the tree(s) and the surrounding site, and the current or planned proximity of property and people. Except where specifically noted in the Assessment, none of the trees examined on the property were dissected, cored, probed, or climbed and detailed root crown examinations involving excavation were not undertaken.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 12
While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the trees recommended for retention are healthy, no guarantees are offered, or implied, that these trees, or all parts of them will remain standing. It is professionally impossible to predict with absolute certainty the behaviour of any single tree or group of trees, or all their component parts, in all given circumstances. Inevitably, a standing tree will always pose some risk. Most trees have the potential to fall, lean, or otherwise pose a danger to property and persons in the event of adverse weather conditions, and this risk can only be eliminated if the tree is removed.
Without limiting the foregoing, no liability is assumed by LGL or its directors, officers, employers, contractors, agents or Assessors for:
a) any legal description provided with respect to the Property;
b) issues of title and or ownership respect to the Property;
c) the accuracy of the Property line locations or boundaries with respect to the Property;
d) the accuracy of any other information provided to LGL by the Client or third parties;
e) any consequential loss, injury or damages suffered by the Client or any third parties, including but not limited to replacement costs, loss of use, earnings and business interruption; and,
f) the unauthorized distribution of the Assessment.
11.4 GENERAL Any plans and/or illustrations in this Assessment are included only to help the Client visualize the issues in this Assessment and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Figures
Figures
DOUG
LEAV
ENS B
LVD
OSPR
EY B
LVD
8TH LINE
9TH LINE
DERR
Y ROA
D
BRITA
NNIA
ROA
D
TRAFALGAR ROAD
LISGAR DRIVE
WINSTON CHURCHILL BOULEVARD
MCDO
WEL
L DRI
VE
10TH LINE WEST
BATT
LEFO
RD R
OAD
HIGHWAY 407
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00June 2019
1VLG
MJO1:10,000
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Key Map
Figure 4A (#6136)
±0 340 680170
Meters
City ofMississauga
Figure 4B(#6168)Figure 4C
(#6252, 6302 & 6314)
!
!
!
Figure 4D(#6432)
!
Figure 4E(#6596)
!
South Draft PlanNorth Draft PlanStudy Area
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00May 2019
2AVLG
MJO1:1,000
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Resources
±0 30 6015
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Dripline
Property Boundary
Watercourse (LIO)
Dead/Poor Condition Tree!!
Ash Tree (Fraxinus sp.)!!
Species of Cultural Origin!!
Native Species!!
±0 60 12030
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6136
#6168
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00May 2019
2BVLG
MJO1:2,100
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Resources
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Dripline
Property Boundary
Watercourse (LIO)
Dead/Poor Condition Tree!!
Ash Tree (Fraxinus sp.)!!
Species of Cultural Origin!!
Native Species!!
±0 40 8020
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6252#6288#6302
#6314
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00May 2019
2CVLG
MJO1:1,300
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Resources
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Dripline
Property Boundary
Watercourse (LIO)
Dead/Poor Condition Tree!!
Ash Tree (Fraxinus sp.)!!
Species of Cultural Origin!!
Native Species!!
±0 60 12030
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6432
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00May 2019
2DVLG
MJO1:2,000
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Resources
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Dripline
Property Boundary
Watercourse (LIO)
Dead/Poor Condition Tree!!
Ash Tree (Fraxinus sp.)!!
Species of Cultural Origin!!
Native Species!!
±0 40 8020
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6596
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00May 2019
2EVLG
MJO1:1,500
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Resources
Dripline
Property Boundary
Watercourse (LIO)
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Dead/Poor Condition Tree!!
Ash Tree (Fraxinus sp.)!!
Species of Cultural Origin!!
Native Species!!
Offsite Tree Dripline
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Figures
Figure 3. Subject Lands Species Composition.
EX IS T INGCHANNEL
EX IS T INGPLACE OFWORS HIP
EX IS T INGS WM POND
EX IS T INGRES IDENT IAL
BLOCK 82S WM POND2.87ha (7.09a c)
BLOCK 92ROAD WIDENING0.12ha (0.30a c)
5.21N38°04'00"E
N37°18'40"E
N38°18'40"E
N45°57'00"W 237.47
25.41
N45°57'00"W 61.37
5.21
78.61
53.16
5.21
165.79
N69°41'00"W
65.45
C=409.23
N57°41'50"W
N38°04'00"E
157150
987 6
432
1
99
9894
9088
84
83
82
7978
77
75 73
70
69
66
6463
6261
59
5857 55 54
53
52
5148
43
39
38
35
34
28
27
26 2423
2120
19
16
15
141312
11
10
156
155
154152
151
149147
146145144
143142
138
132
131
130
129128127
126
124123121
119
118117115113
110106
5
9796
959392
9189
87 86
8581
80
76
74
72
71 6867
65
60
56
504947
46
4544
4241
40
37
36
33
3231
30
29 25
22
1817
153
148
141140139
125122 120
116114112111
109108
107105
104
103
102101100
136135
133
12501248
1241 1239
12371236
1169
1168
11671166
1165
1164
11621161
1160
11591158
1157115611551152
11501149 1148
1147
1146
137
134
1243
1163
115411531151
1250124912471246
1245
1242
12401238
1237
14121407
14061405
1384
1383
1382
1381
1378
1365
1364
1362
13611360
1251
1411
1359
13541410
1409
1404
1403
14021401
1400
1399
13961394 1392
1388
1387 1386
1380 1363
1408
1398
13971395
13931391
13901389
13851379
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00 4AVLG
M JO1:1,000
±0 30 6015
M eters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
M a y 2019
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Management Plan
S ervice La yer Credits: S ource: Esri, Digita lGlob e, GeoEye, Ea rthsta r Geogra phics, CNES /Airb us DS , U S DA, U S GS , AeroGRID, IGN, a nd the GIS U ser Com m unity
Tree Loca ted Offsite150
Dea d/Poor Condition T reeTo Be Rem oved134Tree Identified for Retention150Tree Identified for Rem ova l122Property Bounda ry
Wa tercourse (LIO)
For project pla nning a nd scheduling purposes, rem ova l ofvegeta tion should not occur b etween M a rch 30 to Octob er 1 toa void im pa cts to nesting b irds a nd sum m er roosting b a ts.
Trees on neighb ouring non-pa rticipa ting properties or on theproperty b ounda ry sha ll b e left in pla ce until such tim e tha t theownership is confirm ed or upon a cquisition of writtena uthoriza tion for rem ova l.T ree protection m ea sures a re to rem a in in pla ce until a ll siteworks ha ve b een com pleted, a t which point tree protectionm ea sures sha ll b e rem oved.
Periodic inspections of T PZ ’s during construction a nda ssessm ents of ha za rd potentia l post-construction should b econducted to ensure a dequa te protection is provided for treesidentified for preserva tion a nd to ensure the risk of ha za rd iskept to a m inim um .
T ree Protection Fence
OS PREYBOU LEVARD
WINDHAVEN DRIVEEX IS T INGRES IDENT IAL
EX IS T INGRES IDENT IAL
EX IS T INGCHANNEL
EX IS T INGPLACE OFWORS HIP
EX IS T INGS WM POND
EX IS T INGRES IDENT IAL
R=8R=8
R=8
S T REET 'A'
ST. 'B'
S T REET 'I'
S T REET 'I'
ST. 'J'
S T. 'I'
LN 'D' LANE 'E'
LANE 'F'
LN 'G'
BLOCK 63CONDOM INU MAPART M ENT ST OWNHOU S ES /S T ACK ED T OWNHOU S ES350 - 1,360 U NIT S4.52ha (11.17a c)
BLOCK 82S WM POND2.87ha (7.09a c)
BLOCK 78T RAIL0.26ha (0.64a c)
BLOCK 86T RANS IT WAY2.97ha (7.33a c)
BLOCK 87T RANS IT WAY BU FFER1.09ha (2.69a c)
BLOCK 83GREENLANDS5.23ha (12.92a c)
BLOCK 91ROAD WIDENING0.25ha (0.62a c)
BLOCK 92ROAD WIDENING0.12ha (0.30a c)
BLOCK 990.3m RES ERVE
BLK 980.3m RES ERVE
BLOCK 950.3m RES ERVE
BLOCK 930.3m RES ERVE
BLOCK 940.3m RES ERVE
BLOCK 65RES IDENT IAL RES ERVE0.04ha (0.10a c)
BLOCK 66RES IDENT IALRES ERVE0.03ha(0.07a c)
BLOCK 74WALK WAY0.001ha (0.002a c)
BLOCK 75WALK WAY0.005ha (0.01a c)
BLOCK 155 U NIT S
BLOCK 146 U NIT S
BLOCK 137 U NIT S
BLK 514 U NIT S
BLK 614 U NIT S
BLOCK 626 U NIT S
BLK 534 U NIT S
BLOCK 524 U NIT S
BLK 604 U NIT S
BLOCK 548 U NIT S
BLOCK 598 U NIT S
BLOCK 588 U NIT S
BLOCK 558 U NIT S
BLOCK 568 U NIT S
BLOCK 578 U NIT S
BLOCK 96 U NIT S
BLOCK 106 U NIT S
BLOCK 116 U NIT S
BLOCK 127 U NIT S
BLOCK 64RES IDENT IAL RES ERVE0.06ha (0.15a c)
N37°43'00"E
N45°42'30"W 180.99N45°40'40"W 61.53
N37°42'00"E
5.21
276.55
N45°43'40"W61.55
29.59
29.59
N37°42'50"E
5.21
276.60
61.52 61.50 357.26 5.21N38°04'00"E
N37°18'40"E
N38°18'40"E
N45°57'00"W
582.42
237.47
25.41
N45°57'00"W 61.37
5.21
78.61
53.16
5.21
165.79
N69°41'00"W
65.45
R=985.00
A=412.23
C=409.23
N57°41'50"W
N45°45'20"W N45°45'20"W
N37°42'30"E
N45°45'20"W
N38°04'00"E
BLOCK 79T RAIL0.06ha(0.15a c)
BLOCK 76WALK WAY0.005ha (0.01a c) 1426
14211418
1414
14131412
1407
1406
1384
1383
1382
1381
13781366
13651364
1362
13611360
1357
13531352
1345
1330
132913281326
1323
13191318
13101309
13031300 1298
1297
1293
12881285
1284
1283
1279
1277
1276
1272127012691267
126512631262
12611260
1259
1257
12561255 1252
1251
1248
12441241
1239
12361235
123412331232
1231
1230122912271226
122512231221
1215
12131211
1210
1207
1202
1199
1198
1194
1192
1179
1178 1177 1169
1168
11671166
1165
1164
11621161
11601159
1158
1157115611551152
1150
1149 1148
11461145
1144
1143
1142
1141
1139
1138
1137
1134
1133
1132
1130
1129
1127
1126
1123
1122
1121
14111405
1359
1354
1327
13251324
1322
1321
1316
1315
13141313
13121311
1308
1307
1306
1305130413021301
1299
12951294
1292 12901289
1287
1282 1278
12751274
1273
12711266
1258
1243
1224
1220
1212
1201
1197
1195
1193
1163
11541153 1151
1147
1140
1136
1135
11311128
1125
1124
1427
14251410
1409
14041403
140214011400
13961394 1392
1388138713861380
137713761375
137413731371
1369
1367
13581356
1355
1351
134913481346
1344
1342
1341
13391337
1291
1281
1268
1264
12501249
1247
12421238
122812221219
1216
12141209
12081206
1205
1204 119111891187
1185
11841183
1182
11811180
1176
11751170
1424
1423
1422
1420
1419
14171416
1415
1408
13991398
13971395
13931391
13901389
138513791372
1370
1368
1363
1350
1347
1343
13401338
1336
1335
1334
1333
13321331
1320
1317
1296
1286
1280
12541253
12461245
1240123712181217
1203
1200
1196
119011881186
1174
1173
1172
1171
150
146 145144 143
138
137136135
148
142 140139
149147
141
±0 60 12030
M eters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6136
#6168
S ervice La yer Credits: S ource: Esri, Digita lGlobe, GeoEye, Ea rthsta r Geogra phics, CNES /Airbus DS , U S DA, U S GS , AeroGRID, IGN, a nd the GIS U ser Community
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00 4BVLG
M JO1:2,100
M a y 2019
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Management Plan
T ree Loca ted Offsite150
Dea d/Poor Condition T reeT o Be Removed134Tree Identified for Retention150Tree Identified for Remova l122Property Bounda ry
Wa tercourse (LIO)
For project pla nning a nd scheduling purposes, remova l ofvegeta tion should not occur between M a rch 30 to October 1 toa void impa cts to nesting birds a nd summer roosting ba ts.
T rees on neighbouring non-pa rticipa ting properties or on theproperty bounda ry sha ll be left in pla ce until such time tha t theownership is confirmed or upon a cquisition of writtena uthoriza tion for remova l.T ree protection mea sures a re to rema in in pla ce until a ll siteworks ha ve been completed, a t which point tree protectionmea sures sha ll be removed.
Periodic inspections of T PZ ’s during construction a nda ssessments of ha za rd potentia l post-construction should beconducted to ensure a dequa te protection is provided for treesidentified for preserva tion a nd to ensure the risk of ha za rd iskept to a minimum.
Tree Protection Fence
WIN DHAV EN DRIV E
MIRIAM WAY
EXIST IN GRESIDEN T IAL
EXIST IN GRESIDEN T IAL
R=8R=8 R=8
R=8
R=555
R=596
ST REET 'A' ST REET 'A'
ST. 'B'
ST REET 'H'
ST REET 'I'
ST REET 'I'
ST. 'J'
ST. 'I'
L AN E 'C'
L N 'D' L AN E 'E'
L AN E 'F'L AN E 'F'
LN 'G'
BL OCK 71PARK0.49ha (1.21a c)
BL OCK 72PARK0.96ha (2.40a c)
BL OCK 63CON DOMIN U MAPART MEN T ST OWN HOU SES /ST ACKED T OWN HOU SES350 - 1,360 U N IT S4.52ha (11.17a c)
BL OCK 78T RAIL0.26ha (0.64a c)
BL OCK 85T RAN SIT WAY2.17ha (5.36a c)
BL OCK 88T RAN SIT WAY BU FFER0.82ha (2.03a c)
BL OCK 86T RAN SIT WAY2.97ha (7.33a c)
BL OCK 84GREEN L AN DS3.39ha (8.38a c)
BL OCK 83GREEN L AN DS5.23ha (12.92a c)
BL OCK 91ROAD WIDEN IN G0.25ha (0.62a c)
BL OCK 990.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 970.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 960.3m RESERV E
BL K 980.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 950.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 930.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 940.3m RESERV E
BL OCK 65RESIDEN T IAL RESERV E0.04ha (0.10a c)
BL OCK 66RESIDEN T IALRESERV E0.03ha(0.07a c)
BL OCK 67RESIDEN T IALRESERV E0.01ha(0.02a c)
BL OCK 68RESIDEN T IALRESERV E0.00ha (0.00a c)
BL OCK 73WAL KWAY0.005ha (0.01a c)
BL OCK 74WAL KWAY0.001ha (0.002a c)
BL OCK 75WAL KWAY0.005ha (0.01a c)
BL OCK 177 U N IT S
BL OCK 155 U N IT S
BL OCK 146 U N IT S
BL OCK 137 U N IT S
BL K 404 U N IT S
BLOCK 476 U N IT S
BL OCK 468 U N IT S
BL OCK 486 U N IT S
BL OCK 498 U N IT S
BL K 514 U N IT S
BL K 614 U N IT S
BL OCK 626 U N IT S
BL OCK 506 U N IT S BL K 53
4 U N IT SBL OCK 524 U N IT S
BL K 604 U N IT S
BL OCK 548 U N IT S
BL OCK 598 U N IT S
BL OCK 588 U N IT S
BL OCK 558 U N IT S
BL OCK 568 U N IT S
BL OCK 578 U N IT S
BL OCK 76 U N IT S
BL OCK 87 U N IT S
BL OCK 96 U N IT S
BL OCK 106 U N IT S
BL OCK 116 U N IT S
BL OCK 127 U N IT S
BL OCK 6
7 UN ITS
BL OCK 64RESIDEN T IAL RESERV E0.06ha (0.15a c)
N37°43'00"E
N 45°45'20"W
366.10
40.23
N 45°42'30"WN 45°40'40"W 61.53
60.96
N 45°45'20"W 101.19
N37°42'00"E
5.21
276.55
N 45°43'40"W61.55
29.59
29.59
N 37°42'50"E
5.21
276.60
61.52 61.50N 45°45'20"W N 45°45'20"W N 45°45'20"W
N37°42'30"E
BL OCK 167 U N IT S
BL OCK 79T RAIL0.06ha(0.15a c)
BL OCK 77WAL KWAY0.005ha (0.01a c)
BL OCK 76WAL KWAY0.005ha (0.01a c)
17061705
1704
17031702
17001699
1698 1697
1696
1695
1693
16911689
1687
1686
1685
1684
1683
1679
1678
16741673
167216691668
16641663
1662 1659
1658
1657 16561655
16531648
1647
164616441643
1640
1639
16371635
1634
16331632
1631
1629
1626
16241621 1619
16181617
16161615
16131612
1611
1607
160616051603
1602
1601
1600
1599
159815961595
1594
1593
1592
15911590 1589
1588
1587
1586
1584
1583
15821581
15801579
15781577
15751574 1573
15711570
1569
1568
15671566
1565
1563
15621561 1560
1559
15571554
15531547
1546
1545
1543
1541
15401539
1538
1537
1533
1528 15271525
1523
1522
1521
1518
15171516 1515
1512
1511 150915081507 1506
1504
15031502
15011499
1498
1497
1494 1493
1492
14911488
1487
1486
14851484
1483
1479
1478
147714761474
1470
1467
14641462
1460
1458
1457
145614551454
1452
1451
1450
14491448
1447
1445
14441443
1442
14411439
14381436
1434
1433
143014291428
1120
1119
11171115
1113
1112
1111
1110
1108
1104
1103
1102
10971096
10951093
1091
1090
1087
1084
10831082
1081
1080
10791078
10771076
1075
10741073
1072
1070
10651063
10601058
1057
1056
1055
10541053
1051 1050
10481043
1040
1039
1038
1037
10351034
1033
1032
1031
10301029
1028
1027
1025
1701
16941692
16901688
16821681
1680
167716761675
16711670
166716661665
16611660
1654
1652
1651
16501649
16451642
1641
1638
1636
1630
16281627
1625
16231622
1620
1614
161016091608
1604
1597
1585
1576
1564
1558
15561555
155215511550
15491548
15441542
153615351534
1532
1531
15301529
1526
1524
1520
1519
1514
1513
15101505
15001496
14951490
1489
14821481 1480
14751473
1472147114691468
14661465
1463
1461
1459
1453
1446
1440
1437
11181116
11141109
1107
1106
1105
110111001099
1098109410921089
1088
10861085
1071
1064
106210611059
1052
1049
1047
104610451044
10421041
1036
1026
1435
1432
1068
1066
1572
1431
10691067
±0 40 8020
Meters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6252#6288#6302
#6314
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
T A8851-00 4CV L G
MJO1:1,300
Ma y 2019
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Management Plan
Service L a yer Credits: Source: Esri, Digita lGlob e, GeoEye, Ea rthsta r Geogra phics, CN ES/Airb us DS, U SDA, U SGS, AeroGRID, IGN , a nd the GIS U ser Com m unity
T ree L oca ted Offsite150
Dea d/Poor Condition T reeT o Be Rem oved134T ree Identified for Retention150T ree Identified for Rem ova l122Property Bounda ry
Wa tercourse (L IO)
For project pla nning a nd scheduling purposes, rem ova l ofvegeta tion should not occur b etween Ma rch 30 to Octob er 1 toa void im pa cts to nesting b irds a nd sum m er roosting b a ts.
T rees on neighb ouring non-pa rticipa ting properties or on theproperty b ounda ry sha ll b e left in pla ce until such tim e tha t theownership is confirm ed or upon a cquisition of writtena uthoriza tion for rem ova l.T ree protection m ea sures a re to rem a in in pla ce until a ll siteworks ha ve b een com pleted, a t which point tree protectionm ea sures sha ll b e rem oved.
Periodic inspections of T PZ ’s during construction a nda ssessm ents of ha za rd potentia l post-construction should b econducted to ensure a dequa te protection is provided for treesidentified for preserva tion a nd to ensure the risk of ha za rd iskept to a m inim um .
T ree Protection FenceOffsite T ree Dripline
1024
1023
102210211020
1019
1018
1024
17061705
1704
17031702
17001699
1698 1697
1696
1695
1693
16911689
1687
1686
1685
1684
1683
1679
1678
16741673
16721669
16681664
166316621659
1658
1657 1656 1655
16531648
1647
164616441643
1640
163916371635
1634
16331632
1631
1629
162616241621 1619
16181617
1616161516131612
1611
1607
1606160516031602
1601
1600
1599
159815961595
15941593
1592
15911590 1589
15881587
1586
15841583
158215811580
15791578
1577157515741573
15711570
1569
1568
15671566
1565
1563
15621561 15601559
15571554
1553 1547
154615451543
1541
15401539
1538
1537
1533
15281527
15251523
1522
1521
1518151715161515
15121511 1509
15081507 1506
1504
15031502
15011499
1498
1497
1494 1493
1492
14911488
1487
1486
14851484
1483
1479
1478
147714761474
1470
1467
14641462
1460
1458
1457
145614551454
1452
1451145014491448
14471445
144414431442
14411439
14381436
1434
1433
143014291428
10971093
1091
1087
1084
10831082
1081
1080
1079
10651063
106010581057
1056
1055
10541053
10511050
1048
1043
1040
1039
1038
1037
10351034
10331032
103110301029
1028
1027
1025
1701
16941692
16901688
16821681
1680
167716761675
1671
1670
166716661665
16611660 1654
1652
1651
16501649
16451642
164116381636
1630
16281627
1625
16231622
1620
1614
161016091608
1604
1597
1585
1576
1564
1558
1556155515521551
1550
154915481544 1542
153615351534
1532
1531
15301529
15261524
15201519
15141513 1510
1505
15001496
14951490
1489
1482
1481 1480
14751473
1472147114691468
14661465
1463
1461
1459
1453
1446
1440
1437
10891088
10861085
1064
1062 10611059
10521049
1047
104610451044
10421041
1036
1026
1435
1432
1068
1066
1572
1431
10691067
±0 60 12030
M eters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6432
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00 4DKC
M JO1:2,000
April 2020
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Management Plan
Servic e La yer Cred its: So urc e: Esri, Digita lGlo b e, Geo Eye, Ea rthsta r Geo gra phic s, CNES/Airb us DS, U SDA, U SGS, Aero GRID, IGN, a nd the GIS U ser Co m m unity
Tree Lo c a ted Offsite150
Dea d /Po o r Co nd itio n TreeTo Be Rem o ved134Tree Id entified fo r Retentio n150Tree Id entified fo r Rem o va l122Pro perty Bo und a ry
W a terc o urse (LIO)
Fo r pro ject pla nning a nd sc hed uling purpo ses, rem o va l o fvegeta tio n sho uld no t o c c ur b etween M a rc h 30 to Oc to b er 1 toa vo id im pa cts to nesting b ird s a nd sum m er ro o sting b a ts.Trees o n neighb o uring no n-pa rtic ipa ting pro perties o r o n thepro perty b o und a ry sha ll b e left in pla c e until suc h tim e tha t theo wnership is c o nfirm ed o r upo n a c quisitio n o f writtena utho riza tio n fo r rem o va l.Tree pro tectio n m ea sures a re to rem a in in pla c e until a ll sitewo rks ha ve b een c o m pleted , a t whic h po int tree pro tec tio nm ea sures sha ll b e rem o ved .Perio d ic inspec tio ns o f TPZ’s d uring c o nstructio n a nda ssessm ents o f ha za rd po tentia l po st-c o nstructio n sho uld b ec o nd ucted to ensure a d equa te pro tectio n is pro vid ed fo r treesid entified fo r preserva tio n a nd to ensure the risk o f ha za rd iskept to a m inim um .
Tree Pro tec tio n Fenc eOffsite Tree Dripline
FU TU REPU BLIC ELEM ENTARY SCHOOL
STREET 'F'
BLOCK 62LINEAR PARK
BLOCK 60CONDOM INU MAPARTM ENTS /TOW NHOU SES /STACKED
TOW NHOU SES
BLOCK 61RESIDENTIALRESERV E(FU TU RE
CONDOM INU MAPARTM ENTS /TOW NHOU SES /STACKED
TOW NHOU SES)
ADDITIONAL LANDS OWNED BY THE APPLICANT
BLOCK 74ROAD W IDENING
FUTURELINEAR PARK
FUTURE PARK
FUTURE PARK
FUTURETRANSITWAY
FUTUREGREENLANDS
1023
102210211020
1019
1018
1017
10121011
1010
1009
1008
10071006
1004
1003
10021001
1016 10151014
1013
1005
±0 40 8020
M eters
City ofMississauga
Ninth Line
#6596
LEGEND
Project
Date
Scale
Figure
Prepared By:
Verified By:
TA8851-00 4EKC
M JO1:1,500
April 2020
Derry BritanniaDevelopments Limited
Tree Management Plan
Servic e La yer Credits: Sourc e: Esri, Digita lGlob e, GeoEye, Earthstar Geogra phic s, CNES/Airb us DS, U SDA, U SGS, AeroGRID, IGN, a n d the GIS U ser Com m un ity
Tree Loc a ted Offsite150
Dea d/Poor Con dition TreeTo Be Rem oved134Tree Iden tified for Reten tion150
For project pla n n in g a n d sc hedulin g purposes, remova l ofvegetation should n ot oc c ur b etween M a rc h 30 to Octob er 1 toavoid im pa cts to n estin g b irds a n d sum m er roostin g b ats.Trees on n eighb ourin g n on -partic ipatin g properties or on theproperty b oun da ry sha ll b e left in pla c e un til suc h tim e that theown ership is c on firm ed or upon a c quisition of writtena uthorization for rem ova l.Tree protection m ea sures are to rem a in in pla c e un til a ll siteworks ha ve b een com pleted, at whic h poin t tree protec tionm ea sures sha ll b e rem oved.Periodic in spec tion s of TPZ ’s durin g c on struc tion a n dassessm en ts of ha za rd poten tia l post-con struction should b econ ducted to en sure a dequate protection is provided for treesiden tified for preservation a n d to en sure the risk of ha za rd iskept to a m in im um .
Offsite Tree Driplin e
Property Boun da ryTree Iden tified for Rem ova l122
W a terc ourse (LIO)Tree Protec tion Fen c e
STREET 'E'
STREET 'D'
STREET 'B'
STREET 'B'
LANE 'A'
STREET 'A'
STREET 'C'
FU TU REPU BLIC ELEM ENTARY SCHOOL
BLOCK 63PARK
EXISTINGSW M POND
BLOCK 701m BU FFER
BLOCK 750.3m RESERV E
BLOCK 760.3m RESERV E
BLOCK 715m BU FFER
BLOCK 725m BU FFER BLOCK 73
ROAD W IDENING
LANE 'B'
BLOCK 64W ALKW AY
BLOCK 65W ALKW AY
BLOCK 66W ALKW AY
BLOCK 67W ALKW AY
BLOCK 69W ALKW AY
BLOCK 68W ALKW AY
LANE 'B'
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Appendix A
Appendix A Application Form
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of Section 135 of the Municipal Act, 2001, SO 2001, c25 and City of Mississauga By-law 0254-2012 and will be used for processing tree permit/permission applications. For the purpose of public access to information, a limited amount of information will be displayed on the City’s website. Questions about thecollection of personal information should be directed to the Private Tree Protection By-law Inspector at 3-1-1.
Important Information / Requirements regarding Application process
A separate application is required for each applicable address. Incomplete applicationswill not be processed.
� This is not a permit. Removal of three trees or more each with a diameter greater than 15 cm before receiving an approved permit will put you in contravention of By-law 0254-2012.
� Ensure you have read and understand the Private Tree Protection By-law in itsentirety before completing this application.
� If this application is signed by an applicant or agent other than the owner, written authorization of the owner is required.
� Provide two (2) copies of plans or drawings of the property showing the location of trees to be removed and those being preserved, and if replanting please include a replanting or landscaping plan. Additional copies may be requested.
� Provide an Arborist report completed by an Arborist as defined, at the direction of the Private Tree Protection By-law Inspector.
� Before removing any trees, written consent is required from an adjacent property owner where any portion of the tree trunk rests on the property line or the adjacent owner’s property.
� Mail or deliver this application and other supporting documentation to the Forestry Section at 950 Burnhamthorpe Road West.
� Applications may take up to 30 days to be processed.
� Fee Requirements: As per #7.� All Ash trees are considered dead/dying.� All pages of this application must
be completed to be accepted by Forestry for review.
� For ASH TREE ONLY applications please email applications to:[email protected]
Owner / Applicant / Municipal Address Information
Municipal Site Address Ward #
Name of Applicant/Agent
� Phone � Cellphone
� Fax (if applicable) � Email
Name of Registered Owner
Mailing Address of Owner (if different than municipal address)
Existing land use
Community Services DepartmentForestry Section
950 Burnhamthorpe Road WestMississauga, Ontario L5C 3B4
Tel.: 3-1-1 (905-615-4311 outside City limits)FAX: 905-615-3098
www.mississauga.ca/forestry
Application to Permit the Injuryor Destruction of Trees on Private PropertyFor a Tree Permit or Tree Removal Permission
� Application to be completed by applicant � Print clearly � All fields are mandatory �
Provide all contact details where applicable, indicating your preferred contact method by checking � the appropriate box.
Form 2205 (Rev. 2017 05)
OFFICE USE ONLY
Permit No. Received by Date(YYYY/MM/DD)
Fee $ Official Receipt # Received by Date(YYYY/MM/DD)
Declaration
� If Owner’s signature cannot be included, a separate Letter of Owner’s Authorization must be provided �
DeclarationI, the Applicant and the Owner, hereby declare that the statements made by me upon this application are, to the best of my belief and knowledge, a true and complete representation of the purpose and intent of this application.
Applicant Signature Print name Date (YYYY/MM/DD)
Owner Signature Print name Date (YYYY/MM/DD)
Arborist Name/Professional # Print name Date (YYYY/MM/DD)
FOR APPLICATIONS WITH ASH TREES ONLY, APPLICANT MUST HAVE A CERTIFIED ARBORIST VERIFY AND SIGN OFF ON INFORMATION
Draft Plan of Subdivisions - Derry Britannia Developments Limited 10Derry Britannia Developments Limited
905 907 [email protected]
Derry Britannia Developments Limited7880 Keele Street, Suite 500, Vaughan, ON L4K 4G7
residential, agricultural
LGL Limited/ON-1088A Martin O'Halloran 2019/06/10
Tree Detail
1. If applicable, provide the file number for any current developmentapplications that have been submitted� Official Plan/Rezoning � Subdivision� Building Permit � Committee of Adjustment� Erosion & Sediment Control Permit � Site Plan � Pool Permit� Land Division
2. Have you removed any trees within this calendar year? � Yes � NoIf yes, how many trees were removed?
How many of these trees were larger than 15 cm? (Please list these trees below)
3. Number of trees being injured or removed:
Total
Dead/Dying Healthy
4. Indicate the species, diameter (in cm) and reason for removal, as well as any additional comments on the Tree Removal Inventory Table below, and/or provide an Arborists Report.
5. Will you be planting replacement trees? � Yes � No If yes, are copies of the replanting plan attached? � Yes � No
6. A site plan or drawing of the subject property is required and must include the following: � The location of any buildings on the property � The dimensions of the property and location of the streets� The location and size of trees being protected � The proposed location for replacement tree(s).� Other natural features on the property
such as slopes and creeks.
7. Fee Requirements: At time of application submission,please provide only the base Tree Removal Permit Fee for theremoval of 3 healthy trees, each with a diameter greater than 15 cm as defined in the Fees and Charges by-law. Please don’t pay for anyadditional trees at this time. When applicable, after inspection of the property any further payments required will be communicated to the Applicant using their preferred method of communication.
Trees which are dead, dying or hazardous are not subject to any fees but do require a permit.
Cheques payable to “City of Mississauga”. This fee is non-refundable.
SpeciesStatus Diameter Reason/Comments Condition
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Already Removed
� To be Removed
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
� Good � Fair
� Poor � Dead
Form 2205 Page 2 (Rev. 2017 05)
Tree Removal InventoryIndicate the species, diameter (in cm), reason for removal or additional comments and tree condition. If more than two (2) healthy trees, document them using the Tree Removal Inventory Table below and/or provide an Arborists Report.
649
183 466
See Tree Management Plan, May 29 2019
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Appendix B
Appendix B Tree Inventory
Appendix B Table 1 Tree InventoryProject: Mattamy 9th LineClient: Mattamy Date: December 7 , 2016, July 24, Aug 1, 22, Sept 18 2018Collectors: LMC, JCN, MJO, VLG Area: 9th Line, Mississauga
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
1 Pinus strobus White Pine 46.0 G G G 4 x2 Pinus strobus White Pine 46.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening3 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 68.0 G G G 6 x x X vines in canopy4 Fraxinus americana White Ash 48.0 D D D 5 x X x no peeling bark5 Fraxinus americana White Ash 47.0 P P P 8 x x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond6 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 65.0 P P P 4 80 x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond7 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 58.0 D D D 2 X x 75% of bark gone Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond8 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 20.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond9 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 20.0 F F F 2 x x x leader broken Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond
10 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond11 Acer rubrum Red Maple 55.0 G F G 5 x x x one leader is topped12 Acer rubrum Red Maple 45.0 23.0 G G G 6 x x x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening13 Acer rubrum Red Maple 44.0 20.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening14 Acer rubrum Red Maple 35.0 27, 25 G G G 5 x15 Acer rubrum Red Maple 37.0 14.0 F F F 4 x x x growing into fence, girdled Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening16 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 36.0 32,23 G G G 6 x x s x x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond17 Acer rubrum Red Maple 71.0 G G F 8 15 x X Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond18 Acer rubrum Red Maple 31.0 G F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond19 Acer rubrum Red Maple 37.0 31.0 F G F 6 x x x x x growing into stake, large limb broken Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond20 Acer rubrum Red Maple 89.0 F F F 10 x x X many broken limbs in canopy Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond21 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond22 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond23 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G F 2 20 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond24 Picea glauca White Spruce 44.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond25 Picea glauca White Spruce 34.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond26 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond27 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 F F F 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond28 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond29 Picea glauca White Spruce 32.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond30 Picea glauca White Spruce 17.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond31 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond32 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 15.0 G G G 3 x x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond33 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond34 Picea glauca White Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond35 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond36 Picea glauca White Spruce 35.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond37 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond38 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond39 Picea glauca White Spruce 27.0 17.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond40 Picea glauca White Spruce 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond41 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 11,11 G G G 3 x x growing with tree 42 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond42 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 22.0 G G G 4 x x growing with tree 41 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond43 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond44 Pinus strobus White Pine 28.0 G G G 4 x x growing with tree 45 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond45 Picea glauca White Spruce 30.0 G G G 4 x x x x growing with tree 44 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond46 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond47 Picea glauca White Spruce 27.0 G F G 3 x x growing with tree 48 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond48 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 26.0 15.0 G F G 6 x x x x growing with tree 47 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond49 Pinus strobus White Pine 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond50 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 14.0 G G G 3 x x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond51 Pinus strobus White Pine 16.0 11.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond52 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond53 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond54 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond55 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond56 Acer rubrum Red Maple 57.0 G G G 6 20 x X Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond57 Picea glauca White Spruce 15.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond58 Picea glauca White Spruce 36.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond59 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 19.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond60 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond61 Pinus strobus White Pine 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond62 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 P P P 2 70 x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond63 Picea glauca White Spruce 31.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 1 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
64 Pinus strobus White Pine 33.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond65 Pinus strobus White Pine 28.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond66 Pinus strobus White Pine 40.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond67 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond68 Pinus strobus White Pine 40.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond69 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond70 Acer rubrum Red Maple 68.0 F F F 8 x x x x X Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond71 Picea glauca White Spruce 38.0 F F F 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond72 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond73 Malus pumila Apple 16.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond74 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond75 Pinus strobus White Pine 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond76 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 30.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond77 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 31.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond78 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond79 Picea abies Norway Spruce 55.0 G G G 6 x X Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond80 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 2 x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond81 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 19.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond82 Picea abies Norway Spruce 34.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond83 Picea abies Norway Spruce 47.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond84 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond85 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond86 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 112.0 G F F 12 20 x x X large limbs dead Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond87 Pinus strobus White Pine 26.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond88 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 F P P 3 70 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond89 Pinus strobus White Pine 22.0 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond90 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 D D D 2 X x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond91 Pinus strobus White Pine 28.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond92 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond93 Pinus strobus White Pine 30.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond94 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 F F F 2 50 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond95 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond96 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond97 Pinus strobus White Pine 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond98 Picea abies Norway Spruce 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond99 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 3 50 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond
100 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 26.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond101 Pinus strobus White Pine 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond102 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond103 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 12.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond104 Pinus strobus White Pine 24.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond105 Picea glauca White Spruce 30.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond106 Pinus strobus White Pine 25.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond107 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 54.0 F F F 10 N x x x X growing with tree 108 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond108 Pinus strobus White Pine 18.0 G G G 2 x x growing with tree 107 Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond109 Picea glauca White Spruce 35.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond110 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond111 Pinus strobus White Pine 20.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond112 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond113 Picea glauca White Spruce 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond114 Pinus strobus White Pine 49.0 G F G 5 x x trunk bent Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond115 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond116 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond117 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 2 90 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond118 Picea glauca White Spruce 39.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond119 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond120 Picea glauca White Spruce 15.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening121 Picea glauca White Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening122 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening123 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening124 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 73.0 G G G 7 x x vines in canopy125 Picea glauca White Spruce 33.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening126 Picea glauca White Spruce 37.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening127 Pinus strobus White Pine 26.0 P P P 3 70 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening128 Pinus strobus White Pine 43.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening129 Pinus strobus White Pine 31.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 92 Road Widening130 Malus pumila Apple 27.0 23,18 G G G 5 x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 2 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
131 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 20.0 15,12 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond132 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 27.0 25,22,20,19 F F P 4 50 x x x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond133 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 22.0 D D D 2 x X x134 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 P P P 2 90 x x135 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 23,15 G G G 7 x x x x North of fence Conflicts with Block 63 Condos136 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 102.0 X P F F 6 40 x x x canopy, girdled by fence Conflicts with Block 63 Condos137 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 85.0 X P P P 6 60 x x x x South of fence Conflicts with Block 63 Condos138 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 100.0 P F F 8 30 x x x x South of fence, girdled by fence Conflicts with Block 63 Condos139 Ulmus americana White Elm 22.0 G F G 4 x x bent leader Conflicts with Block 78 Trail140 Ulmus americana White Elm 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 78 Trail141 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 75.0 X P P P 8 50 x x x x North of fence Conflicts with Block 78 Trail142 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 48.0 P G G 5 x x x North of fence, girdled by fence Conflicts with Block 78 Trail143 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 23.0 G G G 4 x x x South of fence Conflicts with Block 78 Trail144 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 35.0 G G G 5 x x x South of fence Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer145 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 20.0 17.0 F G G 4 x x x Growing on fenceline, girdled Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer146 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 17.0 P G G 2 x x x Growing on fenceline, girdled Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer147 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 50.0 39.0 P P P 7 60 x x x x South of fence Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway148 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 38.0 P F F 5 20 x x x x North of fence Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway149 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 34.0 22,22 P P P 5 50 x x x South of fence Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway150 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 46.0 F G G 5 x x x x North of fence, girdled by fence Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway151 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 15,16,14,14 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 82 SWM Pond152 Salix sp. Willow 45.0 40,27,36,23 G G G 12 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway153 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 38.0 23,22 D D D 5 x X x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway154 Ulmus americana White Elm 21.0 D D D 2 X x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway155 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 50.0 P P P 6 50 x x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer156 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 G G G 3 70 x x Conflicts with Block 78 Transitway Buffer157 Crataegus monogyna English Hawthorn 16.0 G G G 3 x x
1,001 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 18.0 18.0 F F G 4 X X X x 1,002 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 F F G 4 X X x at base 1,003 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 34.0 7,6,3 G G G 5 x x Located within Block 64 Future Park1,004 Morus alba White Mulberry 16.0 15.0 F F G 4 x x debris at base Located within Block 64 Future Park1,005 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 6.0 P F F 3 40 X x Located within Block 64 Future Park1,006 Morus alba White Mulberry 15.0 G G G 2 x x Located within Block 64 Future Park1,007 Morus alba White Mulberry 15.0 G G G 2 x x Located within Block 64 Future Park1,008 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 22.0 20.0 G G G 6 x off site 1,009 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 10,7 F F G 4 x x 20cm from fence Conflicts with Street B1,010 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 P P P 3 X x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,011 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 P P P 3 X x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,012 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 P P P 2 60 x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,013 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 22.0 P F F 3 30 x off site 1,014 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 3 40 x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,015 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 50 x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,016 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 22.0 12.0 P P P 3 50 x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,017 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 G G G 3 x x off site Conflicts with Block 75 Road Widening1,018 Salix sp. Willow 57.0 57,35,22 G G G 10 X X x X off site Conflicts with Block 69 Condos1,019 Salix sp. Willow 95.0 43,57,56,90 F G G 14 X X x X in ditch Conflicts with Block 69 Condos1,020 Salix sp. Willow 100.0 G G G 10 x X Conflicts with Block 69 Condos1,021 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 69 Condos1,022 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 10,10,14 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 69 Condos1,023 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 13,12 G G G 4 x 1,024 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 3 30 X x Conflicts with Block 71 Elementary School1,025 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 38.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 61,026 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 26.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Lane F1,027 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 19.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 61,028 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 27.0 10,10,7,2 F F G 5 X X x x Conflicts with Lane F1,029 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 32.0 25,16 F F G 6 X X x x Conflicts with Block 171,030 Populus alba White Poplar 15.0 3.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 171,031 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 22.0 13,9 F F G 4 X X X x x Conflicts with Street A1,032 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 62.0 G G G 12 x X Conflicts with Block 171,033 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 92.0 G G G 10 X X X x X Conflicts with Block 171,034 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 35.0 22, 17, 17 F F G 6 40 x x Conflicts with Street A1,035 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 30,26,24 G G G 8 X X x x Conflicts with Street A1,036 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 22.0 G G G 1 x x Conflicts with Lane C1,037 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 16.0 G G G 1 x x Conflicts with Lane C1,038 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 35.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 491,039 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 40.0 G G F 4 20 x x Conflicts with Block 71,040 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 23.0 G F F 3 25 x
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 3 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,041 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 21.0 18,12 F F F 4 25 X X N x Mattamy 1,042 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 52.0 G G G 4 x Mattamy 1,043 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Mattamy Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,044 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,045 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 71,046 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,047 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,048 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G x x Conflicts with Block 71,049 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 36.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 71,050 Malus baccata c.v. Crabapple 17.0 17,14 G F G 2 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 71,051 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,052 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,053 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,054 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 26.0 17,18 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,055 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,056 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 27.0 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,057 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 24.0 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Lane F1,058 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 25.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 171,059 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 G G G 5 X x x Conflicts with Lane F1,060 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 11.0 F F G 5 X X NE X x x Conflicts with Lane F1,061 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 21.0 F F G 6 NE X x x Conflicts with Block 171,062 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 171,063 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 G G G 6 N x x Conflicts with Block 171,064 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 8.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 171,065 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 41.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 171,066 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Street A1,067 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 521,068 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 521,069 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 35.0 D D D 1 X x Conflicts with Block 521,070 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 37.0 G G G 6 X x x Conflicts with Block 111,071 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 44.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 111,072 Tilia cordata Little Leaf Linden 42.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 111,073 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 42.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 131,074 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 32.0 27.0 F G G 10 X X x x Conflicts with Block 131,075 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 36.0 19.0 G G G 6 X X x x Conflicts with Block 131,076 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 51.0 G G G 7 X X x X Conflicts with Street A1,077 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 59.0 G G G 8 x X broken leader Conflicts with Street A1,078 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 62.0 F F F 6 30 x X Conflicts with Street A1,079 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 59.0 G G G 8 x X Conflicts with Street A1,080 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 70.0 G G G 8 x X in grown fence Conflicts with Street A1,081 Populus tremuloides Trembling Aspen 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,082 Salix sp. Willow 36.0 36.0 G G G 7 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,083 Salix sp. Willow 38.0 G G G 8 x 1,084 Salix sp. Willow 61.0 32.0 G G G 10 x 1,085 Salix sp. Willow 18.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,086 Salix sp. Willow 21.0 19.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,087 Salix sp. Willow 18.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,088 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 G G G 7 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,089 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 20.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,090 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 20.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,091 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,092 Salix sp. Willow 31.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,093 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 15.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,094 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 15,16 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,095 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 13.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,096 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 24,23 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,097 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 13.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,098 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 18.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,099 Salix sp. Willow 17.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,100 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 23.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,101 Salix sp. Willow 27.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,102 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 21,18,10 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,103 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 19,17 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,104 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 13,12,10 G G G 4 X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,105 Salix sp. Willow 21.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,106 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 16,15 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,107 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 15,13 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 4 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,108 Salix sp. Willow 18.0 G G G 4 10 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,109 Salix sp. Willow 18.0 12,6,5 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,110 Salix sp. Willow 30.0 16,10 G G G 5 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,111 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,112 Salix sp. Willow 19.0 11.0 G G G 4 30 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,113 Salix sp. Willow 37.0 15.0 G G G 6 10 X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,114 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 G G G 6 10 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,115 Salix sp. Willow 25.0 19,17 G G G 5 10 X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,116 Salix sp. Willow 26.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,117 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 G G G 5 20 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,118 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 17,17 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,119 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 19,9 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,120 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 G G G 4 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,121 Salix sp. Willow 21.0 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,122 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 21,18 G G G 4 30 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,123 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,124 Salix sp. Willow 19.0 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,125 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,126 Salix sp. Willow 17.0 16.0 G G G 4 X X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,127 Salix sp. Willow 26.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,128 Salix sp. Willow 29.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,129 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 18.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,130 Salix sp. Willow 30.0 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,131 Salix matsudana Corkscrew Willow 17.0 G G G 4 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,132 Salix sp. Willow 17.0 G G G 3 20 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,133 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 34.0 11,8 F F F 4 40 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,134 Salix matsudana Corkscrew Willow 29.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,135 Salix sp. Willow 28.0 G G G 5 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,136 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 12.0 G G G 4 10 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,137 Salix sp. Willow 16.0 G G G 2 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,138 Salix sp. Willow 25.0 18.0 G G G 5 10 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,139 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 29.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,140 Salix sp. Willow 24.0 23.0 G G G 5 10 x 1,141 Salix sp. Willow 15.0 G G G 3 x 1,142 Salix sp. Willow 15.0 14,14 G G G 4 x 1,143 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 G G G 4 20 X X x 1,144 Salix sp. Willow 35.0 23,14 G G G 7 X X X x 1,145 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 80.0 17.0 G G G 12 10 x 1,146 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 16.0 G G G 4 x 1,147 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 22.0 20,16 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,148 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 48.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,149 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 66.0 42.0 G G G 7 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,150 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 63.0 P F F 5 40 X X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,151 Ulmus americana White Elm 21.0 F F F 4 35 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,152 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 27.0 F F F 4 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,153 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 70.0 16.0 F F F 7 30 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,154 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 19.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,155 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 42.0 G G G 6 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,156 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 24.0 F F F 3 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,157 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 80.0 G G G 12 X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,158 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 32.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,159 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 37.0 32.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,160 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 26.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,161 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 51.0 G G G 7 10 X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,162 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 100.0 P F F 10 X X X x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,163 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 55.0 30.0 G G G 8 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,164 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 56.0 44.0 G G G 9 x Located within Block 83 Greenlands1,165 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 29.0 F G G 6 X x x girdled by fence Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,166 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 54.0 F G G 8 x X Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,167 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 43.0 G G G 8 10 X x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,168 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 16.0 G G G 2 X x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,169 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 16,14,13 G G G 6 X X x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,170 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 12.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,171 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 92 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,172 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 8.0 P P P 2 90 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,173 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 11.0 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,174 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 5 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,175 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,176 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 18.0 P P P 2 70 X X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,177 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 24.0 20.0 F F F 4 30 X X x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,178 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 18.0 18,16,14,7 F F F 4 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,179 Acer saccharum ssp. saccharum Sugar Maple 15.0 12,10 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,180 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 10.0 P P P 2 80 X X X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,181 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 3 98 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,182 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,183 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 14,12 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,184 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 2 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,185 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,186 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,187 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,188 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 3 95 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,189 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,190 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,191 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 3 98 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,192 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 18.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,193 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 G G G 4 W x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,194 Ulmus americana White Elm 31.0 30.0 G G G 7 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,195 Salix sp. Willow 29.0 27.0 G G G 7 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,196 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 28.0 24.0 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,197 Salix sp. Willow 19.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,198 Salix sp. Willow 23.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,199 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 11.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,200 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 14,13,12,10 P P P 5 70 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,201 Salix sp. Willow 29.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,202 Salix sp. Willow 19.0 18.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,203 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 25.0 21,18,18 P P P 4 X X X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,204 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 21.0 19,18 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,205 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,206 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 20,20 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,207 Salix sp. Willow 56.0 56,44 F F F 12 X X X x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,208 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,209 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,210 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 20.0 G G G 4 10 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,211 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 G G G 4 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,212 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 13.0 G G G 4 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,213 Acer saccharum ssp. saccharum Sugar Maple 18.0 18,16 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,214 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 P P P 4 X X X X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,215 Salix sp. Willow 90.0 F F F 5 X x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,216 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,217 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,218 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,219 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 21.0 9.0 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,220 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 72.0 F F F 5 30 x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,221 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 77.0 P F F 5 30 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,222 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 15.0 P P P 3 X X X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,223 Salix sp. Willow 37.0 30,27 F F F 12 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 78 Trail1,224 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 42.0 P P P 4 90 X x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,225 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 35.0 P P P 3 90 x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,226 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 23.0 F F F 3 20 x x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,227 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 56.0 F F F 7 30 X X x X Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,228 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 2 80 X X x Conflicts with Block 78 Trail1,229 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 24.0 G G G 2 10 X x x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,230 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 24.0 G G G 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 87 Transitway Buffer1,231 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 84.0 G G G 10 x X Conflicts with Block 78 Trail1,232 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 19.0 G G G 3 X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,233 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 19,15 G G G 5 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,234 Salix sp. Willow 30.0 27.0 G G G 7 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,235 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 32.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,236 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,237 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,238 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,239 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 G G G 4 X X N x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,240 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 32.0 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,241 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 24.0 11.0 G G G 6 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 6 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,242 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,243 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 33.0 P F F 4 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,244 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 P F F 3 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,245 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,246 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,247 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 33.0 P P P 2 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,248 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 32.0 G G G 4 X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,249 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,250 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 30.0 11.0 P P P 3 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,251 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 49.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,252 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 27.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,253 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,254 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,255 Salix sp. Willow 52.0 35.0 G G G 12 X X x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,256 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 35.0 P P P 6 98 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,257 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 29.0 P P P 5 98 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,258 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 45.0 P P P 6 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,259 Salix sp. Willow 40.0 35.0 P P P 5 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,260 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 40.0 G G G 7 X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,261 Salix sp. Willow 52.0 28.0 F F F 10 x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,262 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 27.0 P P P 3 98 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,263 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 51.0 G G G 9 x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,264 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 13.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,265 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 49.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,266 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 45.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,267 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 20.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,268 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 15,13 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,269 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 43.0 40.0 G G G 15 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,270 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 22.0 18,18,14 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,271 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 18,16 G G G 4 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,272 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 22.0 19,17 G G G 5 10 X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,273 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 G G G 4 X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,274 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 15,10 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,275 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,276 Salix sp. Willow 19.0 G G G 10 X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,277 Ulmus americana White Elm 21.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,278 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 31.0 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,279 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 G G G X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,280 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 21.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,281 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,282 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,283 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 25.0 G G G 5 X X X x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,284 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,285 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,286 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,287 Picea abies Norway Spruce 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,288 Ulmus americana White Elm 29.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,289 Ulmus americana White Elm 18.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,290 Ulmus americana White Elm 15.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,291 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,292 Picea abies Norway Spruce 26.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,293 Picea abies Norway Spruce 29.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,294 Picea abies Norway Spruce 29.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,295 Picea abies Norway Spruce 18.0 F F F 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,296 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,297 Picea abies Norway Spruce 17.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,298 Picea abies Norway Spruce 31.0 F F F 5 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,299 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,300 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,301 Picea abies Norway Spruce 29.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,302 Picea abies Norway Spruce 21.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,303 Picea abies Norway Spruce 30.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,304 Picea abies Norway Spruce 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,305 Picea abies Norway Spruce 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,306 Picea abies Norway Spruce 28.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,307 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 32.0 P P P 5 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,308 Picea abies Norway Spruce 29.0 F F F 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 7 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,309 Picea abies Norway Spruce 18.0 P P P 2 95 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,310 Picea abies Norway Spruce 28.0 F F F 3 20 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,311 Picea abies Norway Spruce 20.0 F F F 3 20 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,312 Picea abies Norway Spruce 20.0 F F F 3 20 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,313 Picea abies Norway Spruce 27.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,314 Picea abies Norway Spruce 17.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,315 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,316 Picea abies Norway Spruce 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,317 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 P P P 4 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,318 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,319 Picea abies Norway Spruce 15.0 F F F 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,320 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 P P P 2 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,321 Picea abies Norway Spruce 29.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,322 Picea abies Norway Spruce 22.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,323 Picea abies Norway Spruce 31.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,324 Picea abies Norway Spruce 32.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,325 Picea abies Norway Spruce 17.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,326 Picea abies Norway Spruce 35.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,327 Picea abies Norway Spruce 31.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,328 Picea abies Norway Spruce 31.0 F F F 3 30 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,329 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 16.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,330 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 16.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,331 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 23.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,332 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,333 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,334 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,335 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,336 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,337 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 23.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,338 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,339 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 16.0 D D D 0 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,340 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,341 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 22.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,342 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,343 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 36.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,344 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 36.0 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,345 Ulmus americana White Elm 17.0 G F F 2 x x vine covered Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,346 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 55.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,347 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,348 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,349 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 60.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,350 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 36.0 25.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,351 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 32.0 28.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,352 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 P F F 3 x fallen Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,353 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 23.0 P F F 3 x severe lean Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,354 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,355 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,356 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,357 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 32.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,358 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 35.0 D D D 4 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,359 Salix sp. Willow 130.0 G G G 14 x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,360 Salix sp. Willow 52.0 28,40,38 G G G 14 x x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,361 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 15.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,362 Salix sp. Willow 21.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,363 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 P P P 1 30 x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,364 Betula papyrifera White Birch 42.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,365 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 15.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,366 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 24.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,367 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 34.0 D D D 3 X X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,368 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,369 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 25.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,370 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,371 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 43.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,372 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,373 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 25.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,374 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,375 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 29.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 8 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,376 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 28.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,377 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,378 Betula papyrifera White Birch 40.0 32.0 F G G 6 x x x x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,379 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 29.0 24.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,380 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,381 Betula papyrifera White Birch 29.0 P F P 3 30 x vine covered Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,382 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 65.0 G G G 8 x 1,383 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 135.0 F G G 14 x x x x X large hollow Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,384 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 55.0 G G G 8 x X Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,385 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 31.0 24,23 D D D 0 X x 1,386 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 45.0 D D D 0 X x broken @8m 1,387 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 43.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,388 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 70.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,389 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 35.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,390 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,391 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 26.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,392 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 29.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,393 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 29.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,394 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,395 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,396 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 49.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,397 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 42.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,398 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 27.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,399 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 31.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,400 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 15.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,401 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 D D D 0 X x at fence confluence 1,402 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 33.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,403 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,404 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 59.0 D D D 0 X x broken @ 10m - chimney Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,405 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 G G G 6 x x lean Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,406 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 P F G 6 x fallen Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,407 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 21.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,408 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 F G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,409 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 P P P 1 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,410 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 30.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,411 Ulmus americana White Elm 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,412 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 F F G 3 x x leans, fallen tree on trunk base Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,413 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 F F G 4 x x x x leans at 1412 Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,414 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 F F G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,415 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 G F F 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,416 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 P P P 3 75 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,417 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,418 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 26.0 F F G 6 x x fallen Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,419 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 18.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,420 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 17.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,421 Ulmus americana White Elm 26.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,422 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 19.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,423 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 20.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,424 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 39.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,425 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 30.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,426 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 F F G 6 x x x x x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,427 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 16.0 D D D 0 X x Conflicts with Block 63 Condos1,428 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 34.0 29,27 G F F 6 30 x x 1,429 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 40.0 F G G 5 x x x leader topped 1,430 Salix sp. Willow 28.0 G G G 3 x 1,431 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 29.0 P P P 1 85 x x main trunk cut, only epicormic shoots 1,432 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 24.0 24.0 D D D 1 95 x X x 1,433 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 31.0 G G G 4 x x 1,434 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 G G G 2 x 1,435 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 43.0 D D D 1 99 X x Conflicts with Block 671,436 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Street A1,437 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 19.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Street A1,438 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 15.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Street A1,439 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 G G G 5 x 1,440 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 27.0 G G G 4 x x x x taken below crotch Conflicts with Block 661,441 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 23.0 20.0 G G G 3 x 1,442 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 4 x
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 9 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,443 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 19.0 G G G 4 x 1,444 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 27.0 24.0 G G G 3 x x x x Conflicts with Ln D1,445 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 20,25 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 651,446 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 43.0 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 651,447 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 37.0 G G F 3 20 x x Conflicts with Block 651,448 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 41.0 20,19 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 651,449 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 4 10 x x Conflicts with Street I1,450 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G F 2 x x Conflicts with Street I1,451 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Street I1,452 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 15.0 G G G 3 x 1,453 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 24.0 22.0 G G G 5 x x debris at base Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,454 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 30.0 G G G 3 x x debris at base Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,455 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 35.0 G G G 5 x debris at base Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,456 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 32.0 31.0 F G G 6 x x debris at base Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,457 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 F F F 2 x x x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,458 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,459 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,460 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,461 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 3 x 1,462 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,463 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,464 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,465 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x 1,466 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 17.0 G G G 4 x 1,467 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G F F 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,468 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,469 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,470 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,471 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,472 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 18.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,473 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,474 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 F F F 2 x x leader topped Conflicts with Block 71,475 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 21.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 71,476 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 22.0 F F F 2 e x x x trunk splitting, being tied together Conflicts with Block 71,477 Picea glauca White Spruce 29.0 G G G 3 x x x x x trunk starting to split Conflicts with Block 81,478 Picea glauca White Spruce 29.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 81,479 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 28.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 90 Road Widening1,480 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 81,481 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 37.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 81,482 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 81,483 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 81,484 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 65.0 F G G 7 x x X cabled trunks Conflicts with Block 81,485 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 29.0 21,20 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 81,486 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 26.0 25,20,11,15 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 161,487 Metasequoia glyptostroboides Dawn Redwood 29.0 F F G 2 x x leader gone Conflicts with Lane F1,488 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 33.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 81,489 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 31.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Lane F1,490 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Lane F1,491 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 26.0 G G G 3 x x x Conflicts with Lane F1,492 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 22.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 161,493 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 29.0 G G G 7 x x girdling roots Conflicts with Lane F1,494 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 F F F 2 x x Conflicts with Block 161,495 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 31.0 G G F 4 30 x x Conflicts with Block 161,496 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 19.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 161,497 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 27.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 161,498 Ostrya virginiana Ironwood 22.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 161,499 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 96.0 G G G 12 x X Conflicts with Block 161,500 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 56.0 G G G 8 x X Conflicts with Block 161,501 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 161,502 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 45.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 161,503 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 59.0 G G G 9 x X Conflicts with Block 161,504 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 92.0 G G G 12 x X Conflicts with Block 161,505 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Street A1,506 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 18.0 16.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,507 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 24.0 G F F 4 40 x x Conflicts with Street A1,508 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 47.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Street A1,509 Picea glauca White Spruce 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Street A
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 10 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,510 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Street A1,511 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G F P 2 50 x x Conflicts with Street A1,512 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 26.0 18.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Street A1,513 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,514 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 21.0 G F F 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,515 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Street A1,516 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,517 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street A1,518 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 77 Walkway1,519 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 161,520 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 77 Walkway1,521 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 19.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 161,522 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 24.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 171,523 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 55.0 31.0 G G G 7 x X Conflicts with Street A1,524 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 31.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Street A1,525 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 44.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Street A1,526 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 41.0 25.0 G G G 10 x x x x x Conflicts with Street A1,527 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 17.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 501,528 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 36.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Street A1,529 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 27.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 501,530 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 501,531 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 42.0 24,23 G G G 6 x x x x Conflicts with Block 501,532 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 26.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 501,533 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 35.0 34.0 G G G 6 x x x x measured above crotch Conflicts with Block 501,534 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 18.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 501,535 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 41.0 29.0 G G G 6 x x x x Conflicts with Block 511,536 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 38.0 36.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Street A1,537 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 38.0 37.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Street A1,538 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 45.0 37,30 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 511,539 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 35.0 34.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 661,540 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 15.0 F F F 2 w x x Conflicts with Block 511,541 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 27.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 501,542 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 30.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 501,543 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 501,544 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 23.0 G F F 2 20 x x Conflicts with Block 501,545 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 44.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 501,546 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 34.0 21.0 F G G 7 x x x small wounds all around trunk Conflicts with Block 501,547 Prunus avium Sweet Cherry 23.0 G G F 5 20 s x x Conflicts with Block 501,548 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 17,13,11 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 501,549 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 37.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 501,550 Pinus strobus White Pine 17.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 501,551 Pinus strobus White Pine 24.0 G G F 3 40 x x Conflicts with Block 501,552 Pinus strobus White Pine 16.0 G F F 2 50 x x Conflicts with Block 501,553 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 501,554 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 501,555 Pinus strobus White Pine 30.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,556 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 30.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,557 Pinus strobus White Pine 15.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,558 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 19.0 19,12,10 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,559 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,560 Pinus strobus White Pine 21.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 621,561 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 43.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,562 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 20,21 P P P 2 90 x Conflicts with Ln D1,563 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 32.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 621,564 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 501,565 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 22.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 501,566 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 19.0 G G G 5 x x Conflicts with Block 501,567 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 30.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 511,568 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 501,569 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 40.0 G F F 5 50 x x Conflicts with Block 511,570 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 16.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 511,571 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,572 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 22.0 18,19 P P P 1 80 x x all stems topped Conflicts with Ln D1,573 Aesculus hippocastanum Horsechestnut 35.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,574 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 20.0 16.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 611,575 Catalpa speciosa Catalpa 54.0 G G G 6 x X Conflicts with Block 611,576 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 54.0 G G G 4 x X Conflicts with Ln D
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 11 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,577 Picea glauca White Spruce 17.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Ln D1,578 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 651,579 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 G G G 5 10 x x Conflicts with Block 651,580 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 34.0 30,28,24 G G G 6 20 x x Conflicts with Block 651,581 Salix sp. Willow 30.0 30.0 G G G 6 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Block 651,582 Salix sp. Willow 27.0 21,18 G G G 6 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,583 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 28.0 F F F 4 40 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,584 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 G G F 3 20 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,585 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,586 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 18.0 G G G 3 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,587 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 G G G 5 x x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,588 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 16.0 G G G 3 x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,589 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 G G G 4 30 x x x x edge of pond Conflicts with Street I1,590 Salix sp. Willow 32.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Street I1,591 Ulmus americana White Elm 23.0 13.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Street I1,592 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 39.0 27.0 G G G 12 x x Conflicts with Street I1,593 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 48.0 31.0 G G G 10 x x 3rd trunk pruned Conflicts with Street I1,594 Salix sp. Willow 55.0 52.0 G G G 10 x X Conflicts with Block 88 Transitway Buffer1,595 Tilia cordata Little Leaf Linden 22.0 22,20,17,16,11 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 88 Transitway Buffer1,596 Tilia cordata Little Leaf Linden 23.0 F G G 4 x x fence growing through Conflicts with Block 88 Transitway Buffer1,597 Larix laricina Tamarack 23.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,598 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,599 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 22.0 G F F 2 x x vines Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,600 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 18.0 G F F 2 20 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,601 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 28.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,602 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 3 x x vines Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,603 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,604 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 41.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,605 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 44.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,606 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 G G G 3 x x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,607 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 78.0 G G G 8 x X Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,608 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 34.0 G G G 3 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,609 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 G G G 4 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,610 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 39.0 35,14 G G G 12 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,611 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 42.0 G G G 8 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,612 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 G G G 7 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,613 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 22.0 G G G 6 x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,614 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 42.0 24.0 G G G 10 x x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,615 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 50.0 28.0 G G G 8 x X Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,616 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 35.0 G G G 5 x x x Conflicts with Block 85 Transitway1,617 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 43.0 G G G 8 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,618 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 37.0 P G G 5 x x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,619 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 P F F 4 40 x x x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,620 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 41.0 F G G 6 x x x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,621 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 26.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,622 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 28.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,623 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 38.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,624 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 22.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,625 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 24.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,626 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 20.0 18.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,627 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 28.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,628 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 27.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,629 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 35.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,630 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 18.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,631 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 51.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,632 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 17.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,633 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 15.0 F F P 2 40 x debris piled at base Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,634 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 19.0 16.0 G G G 3 x debris piled at base Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,635 Salix sp. Willow 35.0 34,32,32,30 G G G 10 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,636 Salix sp. Willow 20.0 18.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,637 Salix sp. Willow 22.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,638 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 22.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,639 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 21.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,640 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 27.0 19,25,26 G G G 6 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,641 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 26.0 G G G 4 x large logs piled at base Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,642 Salix sp. Willow 30.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,643 Salix sp. Willow 25.0 22,22,18,16 G G G 6 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 12 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
1,644 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 20.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,645 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 34.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,646 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 35.0 G G G 7 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,647 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,648 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,649 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,650 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,651 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,652 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 24.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,653 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 24.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,654 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,655 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,656 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 16.0 10.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,657 Picea glauca White Spruce 40.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,658 Picea glauca White Spruce 22.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,659 Picea glauca White Spruce 26.0 G G G 2 X x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,660 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,661 Picea glauca White Spruce 22.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,662 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,663 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,664 Picea glauca White Spruce 29.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,665 Picea glauca White Spruce 27.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,666 Picea glauca White Spruce 25.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,667 Picea glauca White Spruce 23.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,668 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,669 Picea glauca White Spruce 30.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,670 Picea glauca White Spruce 28.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,671 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 31.0 13,12,10 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,672 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 33.0 G G G 6 x girdling roots Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,673 Picea glauca White Spruce 26.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,674 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 30.0 G G G 4 x 1,675 Picea glauca White Spruce 18.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,676 Picea glauca White Spruce 22.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,677 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 36.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,678 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 29.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,679 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,680 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 36.0 G G G 6 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,681 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 32.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,682 Picea glauca White Spruce 25.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,683 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 25.0 G G G 4 x 1,684 Picea glauca White Spruce 19.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,685 Picea glauca White Spruce 27.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,686 Picea glauca White Spruce 34.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,687 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 18.0 18.0 G G G 4 x 1,688 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 25.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,689 Picea glauca White Spruce 28.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,690 Picea glauca White Spruce 28.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,691 Picea glauca White Spruce 20.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,692 Picea glauca White Spruce 24.0 G G G 3 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,693 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 22.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,694 Picea glauca White Spruce 21.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,695 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 86.0 G G G 8 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,696 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,697 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 21.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,698 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 20.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,699 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 21.0 14.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,700 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 17.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,701 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 18.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,702 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 22.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,703 Thuja occidentalis Eastern White Cedar 15.0 G G G 2 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,704 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 28.0 G G G 4 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,705 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 33.0 G G G 5 x Located within Block 84 Greenlands1,706 Populus deltoidesssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 54.0 G G G 7 x x Located within Block 84 GreenlandsCUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 15.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 15.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 15.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 16.0 G G G 3
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 13 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 16.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 17.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 18.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 18.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 19.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 20.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 21.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 23.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 23.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 23.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 23.0 22.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 24.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 24.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 24.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 25.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 26.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 27.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 28.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 28.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 29.0 G G G 3
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 14 of 15
TI CS
CV
Rad
ial D
riplin
e (m
)
Cano
py D
ie B
ack
(%)
Co-
dom
inan
t st
em
Incl
uded
Bar
k
Lean
, Dir.
Fung
us
Inse
cts
Cav
ity
Rot
Wou
nd
Fros
t Cra
ck
Epic
orm
ic
EAB
Can
ker
Supp
ress
ed
PFW
Haz
ard
Boun
dary
Tre
e
Off-
site
Tre
e
GPS
cor
rect
ed
desk
top
Rem
ove
Prot
ect
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (1
5-49
cm)
Mee
ts C
ity
Com
pens
atio
n C
riter
ia (5
0cm
+)
Estim
atio
n of
DB
H (x
)
TAG# Scientific Name Common Name DBH(cm)
Add
ition
al S
tem
s
Comments Rationale for Management
CompensationLocationCondition Management
CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 29.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 29.0 G G G 3CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 31.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 31.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 31.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 32.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 32.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 32.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 32.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 32.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 34.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 36.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 36.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 38.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 38.0 G G G 4CUP1 Picea glauca White Spruce Plantation 40.0 G G G 4
Totals: 649 424 42Legend ConditionDBH (cm) Diameter at breast height G GoodTI Trunk Integrity F FairCS Crown Structure P PoorCV Crown Vigour D DeadDL (m) Drip Line L LightCDB Crown Dieback M ModerateEAB Emerald Ash Borer H HeavyESA/SARA Species at Risk E EastTPZ Tree Protection Zone W WestLean Dir. Lean Direction N North
S SouthF FrostC CompressionT TensionS Shear Plane
Legend ConditionDBH (cm) Diameter at breast height G GoodTI Trunk Integrity F FairCS Crown Structure P PoorCV Crown Vigour D DeadDL (m) Drip Line L LightCDB Crown Dieback M ModerateEAB Emerald Ash Borer H HeavyESA/SARA Species at Risk E EastTPZ Tree Protection Zone W WestLean Dir. Lean Direction N North
LGL Limited environmental research associates Page 15 of 15
Derry Britannia Developments Limited April 2020 Tree Management Plan Project No. TA8851
LGL Limited environmental research associates Appendix C
Appendix C Tree Hoarding Detail