Upload
seamus
View
30
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Australian Innovation Policy and Public-Private Alliances: “Where we were and where we are going". Dr Terry Cutler Australia Lima, April 2008 (Background paper for CEPAL’s project on alliances for export development). Caveat emptor! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Dr Terry CutlerAustralia
Lima, April 2008(Background paper for CEPAL’s project on alliances for export development)
Australian Innovation Policy and Public-Private Alliances:“Where we were and where we are going".
2
Caveat emptor! What shapes my perspectives and observations on this subject ?
¶ Career has straddled corporate and public sector roles
- have sat on both sides of the fence!
¶ Work extensively internationally, especially in Asia
- so interested in differences across national innovation systems - no “one size fits all model”
¶ Background in technology, but also worked extensively in creative industries and their role in innovation
- so believe that a national innovation strategy is more than just a science and technology policy
¶ Currently chairing Australian Government major review of innovation policy for Australia
- so obviously don’t believe we can ever stand still
Dr Terry Cutler
3
The pitfalls around country case studies
There is also as much to be learned from policy failures (or mixed results) as from obviously success outcomes
Dr Terry Cutler
For one’s own country:
tendency to overstate the country’s weaknesses and challenges,and to understate strengths and embedded advantages
and
to over-emphasise the short-run at the expense of the long run.
4
GREAT DESTINATIONPity about no road!
5
What is Innovation?
Innovation = creating value through doing something in a novel way
= ex post, so we need ex ante understandings of the dynamics of socio-economic change
Innovating = creative problem solving
Being innovative = creative problem-solving in order to create value
Dr Terry Cutler
6
Originationor adaptation
Deployment
Diffusion andabsorption
Source: Terry Cutler 2007
KNOWLEDGEPRODUCTION
KNOWLEDGEDIFFUSION
KNOWLEDGEAPPLICATION
entrepreneurialism
productivity;competitiveness
creativity;
problem solving
Innovation is a virtuous cycle for socio-economic change and development.
There has been a lack of coherent theories of innovation to underpin development policies
7
Creativity-the generation of ideas and inventionsRequires fresh thinking and inventiveness
Public - private linkages for sourcing relevant ideas - needs two way awareness of opportunities and needs
Entrepreneurship andcommercialisation-linking good ideas to the right market opportunities
(Good ideas or patents without customersor users are worth nothing)
Diffusion and adaptation-rolling out high potential innovations across industry or the communityCapturing national benefit
Requires entrepreneurs and risk taking
Support for education and research environments.
Industry should lead, but governments should help reduce barriers to success
Firm-to-firm and firm-to-research provider linkages become increasingly important in an era of open innovation and “markets for innovation”
There are thus three facets to innovation - each needs balanced attention within a national innovation system
Government can assist with awareness and extension programmes - especially for SMEs;
Export facilitation
Dr Terry Cutler
8
The triple helix of innovation policy:
(i) market-oriented innovation to increase productivity and improve competitiveness;
(ii) innovations and changes in public policies and service delivery around the production of public goods;
and
(iii) innovations and changes to address societal and environmental aspirations and challenges, and the mobilisation of private and public sector capabilities around these challenges.
Dr Terry Cutler
Dr Terry Cutler
9
Communityservice
providers
firms researchproviders
Government
INFRASTRUCTURE
SKILLS
GOVERNANCE
CAPITAL
REGULATION
TAXATION
NATIONAL CHALLENGES
NATIONAL PRIORITIES
PEOPLE COMMUNITY
Innovation occurs within a complex ecosystem of actors, and relationships …. No one innovates in isolation!
Dr Terry Cutler
10
• The elements of innovation involve both ‘stock’ and ‘flows’: stocks of knowledge and capability, and the information flows of the innovation capital around these.
• We need to invest in the capabilities required around each element of the innovation system, as well as investing in the linkages and flows between them.
• Resources applied to innovation should be regarded as investment in the future, not as expenditure.
Innovation system = the stocks and flows around innovation
Dr Terry Cutler
11
Five key functions within an innovation system
• identification of opportunities
• creating capabilities
• managing risk and uncertainty
• building and maintaining infrastructures
• mobilising resources
Dr Terry Cutler
12
Systemic challenges within an innovation system(areas for potential system failure, over and above market failure)
1. Inadequate infrastructure provision
2. Inadequate institutional development and evolution.
3. Lack of skills and learning problems (eg absorptive capacity).
4. Structural adjustment issues and transitional problems in economic change (eg technology lock-in).
5. Networking and collaboration problems (loose versus tight).
6. Heterogeneity and diversification versus specialisation.
7. Imbalances within and across the innovation system (eg. forgoing leverage - in Australia, the parts are better than the whole!)
Dr Terry Cutler
¶ The tyranny of distance¶ The tyranny of low density (sparcity) ¶ The impact of trade gravity¶ The opportunities from natural endowments (seas, space, land, resources, biodiversity, isolation)¶ The challenges of federated, distributed systems
Putting Australia into context - the innovation challenge of a small economy
Dr Terry Cutler
Strong GDP growth
But … all fuelled by commodities boom.
Challenged agricultural sector - 10 year drought, fuelling longer term
climate change fears
Reasonable productivity growth since mid-1980s (impact of micro-economic reform agenda)*
AUSTRALIA’S ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE - SCORECARD
highly skewed exporting base
Low unemployment, with skill shortages
High household debt,and housing affordability challenge
Inflationary pressures
Low trade intensity across economy as whole (despite having doubled over past three decades-
a function of the scale of the services sector?)
National savings through pension fund scheme
*The sustained productivity gains in the agricultural sector have been more long-run
Dr Terry Cutler
15
Analysts often forget that technological innovation is especially important for resource based economies
“Most of Australia’s massive deposits of minerals were of no use until new technology liberated them. In the last two centuries Australia has depended as much on the rise of new technology as on its own soil, grasslands, minerals and other resources”
Geoffrey Blainey, A Shorter History of Australia, p.24
Dr Terry Cutler
16
EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIA’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
19th century
Superior economic performance to US - off back of mining (gold) and wool
1900-19201901 - Institution building around new Commonwealth of Australia; key role for government enterprises; 1914-1918 war - Disruption to civil imports; lack of local defence materiels
1920-1940 Push for greater local industrial self sufficiency, defence industry and public health capabilities
1940-1960 Sunset of Imperial influence: shift from UK to US alliance. Post war reconstruction, industrialisation: “nation building” projects - including discussion of nuclear futures (off uranium resources).
1960-1980 Manufacturing stagnates behind protectionist barriers; beginning of second mining boom (iron; coal; uranium)
1980-2000 Internationalisation of economy (with reduction of tariffs and floating of currency); programmes for structural adjustment and micro-economic reform; privatisation of government enterprises. Focus on new ICT and biotech technologies. Strong productivity growth.
2000 - New challenges from global warming, energy futures, terrorism and preventable diseases focus new national priorities; emergence of competition from BRIC economies; China now key trading partner
Dr Terry Cutler
17
Some special innovation challenges for Australia:
Industry structure dominated by a very small number of big companies (many MNCs) and a long tail of SMEs
Previously protected manufacturing sector now at risk of being hollowed out by North Asia
Windfall mineral export earnings subject to external factors outside our control (limited counter-cyclical safety nets)
Services sector traditionally very domestically focused (with oligopolistic industry structures in telecommunications, banking, retail …. )
Domestically focused services sector now facing global competition (eg India)
Ageing population - increased health spending and future skill shortages
18
1900-1920 1920-1940 1940-1960 1960-1980 1980-2000 2000 -
1926CSIRO
1936NHMRCRR&DCs1930s
ANSTO
R&D TaxConcession
CRCs
IIF
NCCAustrade
ProductivityCommissionGovtenterprises
AMC
Establishment
Change or major review
Termination
Tariff Board, 1928
Corporatisation De-regulation & privatisation
Statutory incorporation
Industries Assistance Commission
THE INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES
1953
Aust Research Grants Commission, 1965
ARC
Commonwealth Serum Laboratories
CSL Pty Ltd
ASTEC
Not comprehensive
Dr Terry Cutler
19
1900-1920 1920-1940 1940-1960 1960-1980 1980-2000 2000 -
1926CSIRO
1936NHMRCRR&DCs1930s
ANSTO
R&D TaxConcession
CRCs
IIF
NCCAustrade
ProductivityCommissionGovtenterprises
AMC
Establishment
Change or major review
Termination
Tariff Board, 1928
Corporatisation De-regulation & privatisation
Statutory incorporation
Industries Assistance Commission
THE INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES
1953
Aust Research Grants Commission, 1965
ARC
Commonwealth Serum Laboratories
CSL Pty Ltd
ASTEC
Not comprehensive
Dr Terry Cutler
A lot of the institutions date back a long time, albeit within an evolving framework;
We tend to forget abandoned institutions or programmes;
Many aspects of the current framework hark back to a verydifferent industrial world - most current programmes wereconceived in a pre-Interent, pe-digital era!
20
Prime Minister’s Science, Innovation and Engineering CouncilNational Departments*
Agriculture,Fisheries &
Forestry
Industry, Tourism & Resources
Environment &
Water Resources
Communications,IT & Arts
Health &Ageing
Education, Science & Training
Defence TreasuryForeign Affairs
& Trade
Rural R&DCorporations
AusIndustry
IndustryR&D Board
Industry Innovation
Funds
InvestAustralia
Auto programmes
(ACIS)
PharmaProgrammes
(P3)
Bureau ofMeteorology
GeosciencesAustralia
NICTA
BITSprogramme
COMETprogramme
National Health
& Medical ResearchCouncil
AustralianResearchCouncil
CSIRO
ANSTO
AIMS
CRCs
DSTO
Universityfunding
formulae
NationalCompetition
Council
ProductivityCommission
Aust Consumer& CompetitionCommission
ForeignInvestment
Review Board
Dept of Prime Minister& Cabinet
Austrade
Council of Australian Governments: Federal and State co-ordination
State Administrations
Departments of Primary
Industry
Departmentsof Innovation,
Industry & State Development
Departmentsof the
Environment
For eg: CIO, “Multimedia Victoria”,Film Victoria
Health Services
Hospitals
Education
Universities
Treasuries Trade promotion;Investmentattraction
Emergencyservices
* This does not purport to be a comprehensive mapping
EMDG
EFIC
Aust’n National University
Legend:Green: Direct Departmental or Ministerial controlRed: Statutory or ‘arms length’ agencyBlue: programmes under Departmental budgets As at 2007
Dr Terry Cutler
21
Many Australian initiatives have focused onstrengthening public-private linkages - 4 examples
Example 1: Venture Capital
The problem: a systemic failure with VC forearly stage firms
Mid 1990s: Innovation Investment Funds scheme• Licensing of new arms-length private VCs
• Began with 2:1 $ incentive
• Returns to government capped (upside to VC)
• Important aim to attract and build a cadre of skilled professional managers
• US experience (see graph) shows that this is not a short-term challenge
22
Many Australian initiatives built around strengthening public-private linkages - 4 examples
Example 2: Co-operative Research Centres (CRCs)
The problem: Perception that universities and research institutes were not sufficiently linked to industry
Early 1990s to date: Co-operative Research Centres
• Solicit competitive bids from industry and research consortia for matching funds from government
• 7 year funding, with opportunity to re-bid
• Over 70 CRCs currently in place
• Recent review demonstrated significant RoI to country
• Has promoted new collaborative culture
23
Many Australian initiatives built around strengthening public-private linkages - 4 examples
Example 3: Rural R&D Corporations
In 1989 Government legislated to consolidate special rural R&D schemesthat date back to the 1930s.
Model: Industry levies on turnover matched by government funds (from 0.5 to 1:1)
Industry based Boards manage disbursement of funds to priority researchareas for the industry.
Complements similar schemes for rural industry promotion and marketing
Has facilitated highly networked industry clusters in wool, grains, and wine etc
24
Many Australian initiatives built around strengthening public-private linkages - 4 examples
Example 4: Australian Innovation Exchange Network (IXC)
Problem: Poor information markets linking organisations with capabilities and organisations with strategic needs and capability requirements.
IXC pilot in 2004 - now fully established in 2006
Model of trusted intermediaries as innovation brokers between research providers and firms, and between MNCs and SMEs.
The Network of IXC Intermediaries work inside multiple member organisations,under a unique confidential structure, to search for and create connections for business growth. Confidential information is not seen by other members. When an opportunity is found, IXC Intermediaries then help members engage directly through a step-wise disclosure process.
International affiliates being established (UK the first) and now our view is toevolve to an IXC International this year.
25
An innovation future for Australian industry
Australia’s new government has laid out a ten point framework for its innovation policywhich addresses many of the identified challenges going ahead:
1. Build a culture of innovation and new ideas by strengthening investment increativity and knowledge generation.
2. Focus incentives for business R&D to promote global competitiveness,delivering the best outcomes for exports and economic growth.
3. Accelerate the take up of new technology, so Australian firms can access thebest ideas from around Australia and the rest of the world.
4. Make Australia’s innovation system truly international, by supporting partnerships, collaboration and foreign investment in Australian R&D.
5. Use government procurement to support innovative Australian firms.
Dr Terry Cutler
26
The ten point framework for Australian innovation policy:
6. … develop multiple pathways for industry to access the knowledge andexpertise in universities and research agencies.
7. Strengthen the skill base for innovation, including in maths, science andengineering, and professional training for firms to manage innovation.
8. Develop and implement a set of national innovation priorities
9. Strengthen the governance of the national innovation system to supporthigher expectations of government agencies and industry.
10. Review the bewildering array of government innovation and industryassistance programs to reduce duplication and improve effectiveness.
Dr Terry Cutler
27
Dr Terry Cutler
28
Beginning with seven deceptively simply questions …1. Can we imagine a better world?
Are we generating fresh ideas and pushing the boundaries of knowledge?
2. How do we solve the big challenges Australia faces? 3. Can we do everyday things better?
Creative problem solving everywhere, and incremental innovation.
4. How do we make better use of available tools and technologies?
• How do we make it easy for people to adapt and use tools or ideas in new ways?
2. How do we better build and nurture human capital? 3. How might Australia, as a small country, prioritise its
innovation efforts?
29
Proposing national priorities for innovation: we can’t be good at everything
Some starting points ….
1. Start from leveraging Australia’s natural endowments or built strengths
2. Look to areas where there might be a distinctively Australian advantage in developing solutions to globally relevant challenges or markets
3. Identify opportunities through innovation to transform and reinvent existing industries and service delivery for competitiveness
4. Address the small country challenge in internationalising innovation
5. Maximising impact and national benefit from the supporting investments in national capabilities, facilities and innovation infrastructure
Dr Terry Cutler
30
Creating or transforming
industries
Solving major national and
global challenges
Delivering community solutions
Delivering incremental
innovation for industry
Advancing frontier science and knowledge
Science intensive innovation
R&D intensive innovation
Knowledge intensive innovation
5 discrete roles within a national innovation system:both governments and business have a direct stake
Industry oriented Society oriented(Public good research andinnovation)
Dr Terry Cutler
31
Creating or transforming
industries
Solving major national and
global challengesProviding
community solutions
Delivering incremental
innovation for industry
Advancing frontier science and knowledge
Nationalpolicies and priorities
Science intensive innovation
R&D intensive innovation
Knowledge intensive innovation
facilities and infrastructureregulation and institutions
education and training
Capability building
Promoting a clear framework for national investment and decision making (and for aligning the objectives and incentives of partners) Dr Terry Cutler
Developing the different roles within a national innovation systemManaging an innovation portfolio that encompasses the spectrum of activity from breakthrough science through to incremental innovation, all underpinned by crucial national facilities and capability building
32
Skills, experience and know-how
infrastructure(laboratories, equipment …)
collaborations andrelationships
Capability is ….
CAPABILITY
Investing in missions and capabilities to address national priorities.
Dr Terry Cutler
33
CAPABILITIES
PRIORITYactions
PRIORITYNATIONAL
OUTCOMES
‘enduring’ - but evolving
‘enduring’ - but evolving
• externality• focus for impact
• structural• long time scales• ‘irreversible’ decisions• capabilities for future demands • delivery path to impact
• reversible decisions
goals
impact
Investing in missions and capabilities to address national priorities …Matrix management - matching the right capabilities to priority goals
Dr Terry Cutler
34
Some key learnings from our experiences
¶ Important to have mechanisms for promoting a “whole of country” framework - a proactive national innovation system
¶ A proactive approach is facilitated by articulating national priorities and by having an explicit ‘portfolio’ investment model for a national innovation system
¶ Public-private partnerships in innovation will vary by the objective and focus of the innovation activity - there is no “one size fits all” model or approach
¶ Public innovation initiatives should emphasise:- capability building- clarity of national purpose - strategic leadership- co-investment (to leverage funds and to strengthen industry linkages)- a long-term view of investing in the future
¶ Key government role in providing innovation infrastructure and building capability
¶ We must pursue local innovation within a global context
35
We are not in the business of reinventing the wheel…