Upload
florence-webster
View
217
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Mario EdenDepartment ChairAuburn University
Liquid Transportation Fuels and High Value Co-Products from
Integrated Biomass Fractionation and Catalytic Conversion
Mario R. Eden1, Christopher B. Roberts2, Steven E. Taylor3
1Department of Chemical Engineering2Samuel Ginn College of Engineering
3Department of Biosystems EngineeringAuburn University
Inaugural SEC SymposiumFebruary 11, 2013
Overview
AU Biorefinery Platforms
Center for Bioenergy & Bioproducts
Includes Facilities For: Feedstock processing and
analysis
Biomass fractionation
Biomass pretreatment and fermentation
Biomass gasification, gas conditioning, and gas-to-liquids conversions
Transesterification
Fractionation LabTechnology to separate biomass into basic chemical constituents
Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin
Process Development Unit
Lignin-free cellulose for biochemical conversion to alcohols
Low molecular weight, sulfur-free lignin for use in higher value products
Biomass
Cellulose Pellets
Lignin
Center for Bioenergy & Bioproducts
Gasification LaboratoryCollaborating with Gas Technology Institute and Conoco Phillips
Fluidized bed gasifier Air or oxygen blown
650 psi design pressure for gasifier
1300 – 1900 F temperature
100 lb/hr biomass feed
150 lb/hr gas output (36 scfm)
Future phase will add coal in feed
Warm gas cleanup (1000 F)
Downstream Fischer-Tropsch reactors
Operational Spring 2013
Center for Bioenergy & Bioproducts
Mobile gasification and power generation unit
Collaborating with Alabama Power and Community Power Corporation
Downdraft gasifier
Air blown
Atmospheric pressure
1300 – 1650 F temperature
50 lb/hr biomass feed
25 kWe generation capacity
Capable of field deployment
Operational since January 2008
Center for Bioenergy & Bioproducts
Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor
Atmospheric pressure
600-700˚C temperature
Air equivalence ratio = 0.25
Analysis systems
• NDIR based gas analyzer*
• CO, CO2, CH4, H2, O2
• FTIR based gas analyzer*
• NH3, HCN, HCl
• Impinger train tar analysis**
*Online ** Offline
Center for Bioenergy & Bioproducts
XTL Technologies
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis
Gasoline + Diesel + Wax
CnH2n and CnH2n+2 + CO2, H2O, oxygenates
COH2
H H C O
Catalyst Surface: Cobalt, Iron, Ruthenium, etc
H
CH
CH
HH
OH
H
Hans Tropsch
FTS Product Distribution
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty(%
)
Diesel Range Wax Range
Jet Fuel Range
Gasoline Range
FTS Product Upgrading
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Carbon Number
Se
lecti
vit
y(%
)
Traditional FTS
Upgrade light FTS products by oligomerization
Hydrocracking & isomerization
Catalyst: Fe based FT Catalyst
Temp: 240 °C
Pressure: 17 - 77 bar
Catalyst: Amorphous Silica
Alumina (ASA)
Temp: 200 °C
Pressure: 17 - 77 bar
Catalyst: 1 Wt% Pd/ASA
Temp: 330 °C
Pressure: 17 - 77 bar
Inlet
Outlet
FT
HC
O
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 300%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Carbon Number
Se
lecti
vit
y (
%)
Alternative FTS Operation
• Supercritical Phase FTS– SCF-FTS reaction conditions allow for vapor like transport
properties while maintaining liquid like heat transfer and solubilities.
– Results in reduced methane production, enhanced middle distillate yield.
– Better catalyst activity maintenance due to in-situ extraction of heavy products from the catalyst pores with the supercritical fluid solvent.
– Recycling light products into the FTS feed provides simultaneous product upgrade (longer chain length products) and improved reaction media.
Co-Products from SCF-FTS
Supercritical FTS(CO Conversion = 45%)
Gas Phase FTS(CO Conversion = 45%)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Carbon Number
Sel
ecti
vity
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Carbon Number
Car
bon
Sel
ecti
vity
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Aldehyde m-Ketone Alcohol Olefin Other Paraffin
• Aldehydes and other Oxygenates– Fe catalyst for SCF-FTS results in selectivity towards diesel-length
aldehydes and methyl-ketones
– Residence time studies indicate aldehydes are primary products that are converted to olefins
3-Bed FTS Reactor System
GP-FTS with Product Upgrading
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330%
2%
4%
6%n-ParaffinBranched ParaffinOlefinAromatics
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330%
2%
4%
6% n-ParaffinBranched ParaffinOlefinOxygenates
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)
Conversion & Selectivity
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
GP FTSC FTGP FTOCSC FTOC
Time on Stream (hr)
CO
Conv
ersio
n (%
)
TOS CO Conversion
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
4
8
12
16
20
GP FTSC FTGP FTOCSC FTOC
Time on Stream (hr)
CH4
Sel
ecti
vity
(%
)
TOS CH4 Selectivity
TOS CO2 Selectivity
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
10
20
30
40GP FTSC FTGP FTOCSC FTOC
Time on Stream (hr)
CO2
Sel
ectiv
ity
(%)
Liquid Products GP & SC FTS
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330%
2%
4%
6% n-ParaffinBranched ParaffinOlefinOxygenates
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330%
2%
4%
6% ParaffinOlefinAldehyde
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)
GP - FT
SC - FT
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 350%
2%
4%
6% ParaffinBranched ParaffinCyclo ParaffinOlefin
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330%
2%
4%
6% ParaffinOlefinAldehyde
Carbon Number
Sele
ctivi
ty (%
)SC FTS with Upgrading
SC - FT
SC - FTOC
Gas-Phase FTS Simulation
Model Specification
• Fischer-Tropsch Reactor– Based on ARGE reactor (Ruhrchemie and Lurgi)– 2050 tubes, 5 cm ID and 12 m length (48.3 m3)– Recycle of tail gas (ca. 1/3)– Production requires 70.5 gmole CO/sec– CO consumption 1.46 gmole CO/m3-sec– Heat of Rxn = 170,000 J/gmole CO– Volumetric heat generation= 248 kW/m3
– Packed bed thermal conductivity= 4.49 W/m-K– ΔTmax=SeR2/4k, ΔTmax= 8.6°K (average)
Fischer-Tropsch Technology (2004), Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 152, A. Steynberg and M. Dry (Editors), Elsevier
Supercritical Phase FTS
*Enhanced Incorporation of α-Olefins in the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Chain-Growth Process over an Alumina-Supported Cobalt Catalyst in Near-Critical and Supercritical Hexane Media, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2005), 44, 505-521
*All the data is scaled in order to be comparable with Gas-Phase FTS
Process Integration
Process Integration
Simulation Results/Analysis
Supercritical Phase FTS Model
Syngas (kmol/hr)
Gasoline (kg/hr)
JP5 (kg/hr) Total Fuel
(kg/hr)D1 D2 Total D1 D2 Total
Gas-Phase FTS 1524 882 526 1348 1271 417 1688 3036
SCF-FTS
Same Syngas Feed 1524 508 1318 1826 1091 756 1848 3674
Same Fuel Product(based on gasoline)
1122 374 974 1348 806 558 1364 2712
Same Fuel Product(based on total
product)1259 420 1090 1510 903 623 1526 3036
Syngas (kmol/hr)
Gasoline (kg/hr)
JP5 (kg/hr) Total Fuel
(kg/hr)D1 D2 Total D1 D2 Total
Gas-Phase FTS 1524 882 526 1348 1271 417 1688 3036
SCF-FTS
Same Syngas Feed 1524 508 1318 1826 1091 756 1848 3674
Same Fuel Product(based on gasoline)
1122 374 974 1348 806 558 1364 2712
Same Fuel Product(based on total
product)1259 420 1090 1510 903 623 1526 3036
SCF-FTS is about 20% more expensive than Gas-Phase with the same syngas molar feed rate, but produces
about 50% more fuel!
Fuels Production Analysis
Energy Analysis
Higher Alcohol Synthesis
H2 CO
H2O CO2
+
Alcohol formationCO + H2 → CH3OH + 91 kJ
2CO + 4H2 → C2H5OH + H2O + 254 kJ
Hydrocarbon formationCO + 2H2 → (CH2) + H2O + 145 kJ
Water-gas-shift reaction CO + H2O → CO2 +H2 + 41.1 kJ
• Highly exothermic
• Severe reaction conditions (T>=250 C, P >= 4 Mpa) @
• Low selectivity towards higher alcohols
Liquid Product Distribution
0
4
8
12
C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18Pro
du
ctiv
ity
(g/k
gC
at/h
)
n-paraffin productivity
Supercritical hexanes phase Gas Phase
0
4
8
12
16
Methanol Ethanol 1-propanol 2-propanol 1-butanol 2-butanol isobutanol 1-pentanol 1-hexanol 1-heptanol 1-octanolPro
duct
ivity
(g/
kgC
at/h
)
Alcohol productivity
Supercritical hexanes phase Gas phase
SCF Effect on Productivity
Catalyst: 0.5 wt% K doped Cu/Co/ZnO/Al2O3 Temperature: 300 ºC
Pressure: 4.5 MPa – 18 MPa H2/CO: 2PSyngas: 4.5 MPa FSyngas: 50 sccm
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
11.5
23
Productivity(g/kgcat/h)
Hexanes/syngasmolar ratio
Effect of H2/CO Ratio
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
1.00
1.35
1.75
2.00
H2/COmolar ratio
Productivity (g/kgcat/h)
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
2.001.75
1.35
1.00
Productivity(g/Kgcat/h)
H2/COmolar ratio
Gas Phase
SCF Phase
Summary
• Biomass Fractionation & Gasification– Enables production of uniform commodity type
products– Targeted processing of each constituent
separately– Enables conversion of disparate feedstocks to
syngas
• Supercritical Phase FTS & Alcohol Synthesis
– Significant increase in fuel range products– Improved carbon utilization– Co-production of aldehydes and methyl ketones– Higher alcohol synthesis favored at lower H2/CO
ratios under supercritical conditions
• Modeling and Optimization– Enables systems level analysis of performance
potential
Acknowledgements
Dr. Mario EdenDepartment ChairAuburn University