Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Challenges and The Way Ahead
Dr John KeungDean, Building and Construction Authority Academy, Singapore
Impetus for Productivity Drive
Foreign Rank & File Workers vs Construction Output
Workforce Strength Inexperienced Workforce
> 300,000 workers^
Approx. 70% are foreign
Aus, UK & US Singapore
< 4 years
≥ 4 years
87%
13%
51%49%
^ as of 2012
Source : Restructuring the Singapore Built Environment to Achieve Higher Productivity, Boston Consulting Group
Unsustainable Workforce Growth
2D Design (Hardcopy)
Stagnating Value AddedProductivity
Low site productivity of0.380 m2 per manday(as of 2009)
Infancy in Digital Engineering Application
Impetus for Productivity Drive
70
80
90
100
110
120
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Value Added Productivity Growthfor Construction Industries
Singapore
Stagnant
Manual and Labour Intensive Construction Methods
Extensive External Scaffold
Concreting with Bucket
Manual Construction Involving Multiple Trades at Site to Construct a Bathroom : 13-15 Trades
Building a brick wall
Conventional timber framework
The Productivity Problem?
Dominance of Low Cost and Low Skilled Workers
Low Construction Wages
Average Weekly Wages (USD)
Source : Boston Consulting Group’s Average Weekly Wages chart cited in its 2014 Benchmarking report on Restructuring the Singapore Built Environment to Achieve Higher Productivity; )
Productive Technology (High Cost)
Manual Labour (Low Cost)
Cost ($)
High Substitution Cost
$$$
$
The Productivity Problem?
Limited flow or exchange of information along value chain
Unproductive and costly reworks, inefficient building maintenance
The Productivity Problem?
Silo Mentality in Construction Value Chain
Construction 21 (C21)c
“The construction industry must transform itselfinto a knowledge and high-value added industry…”
C21 Report, 1999
2010
2015
1999
1st Construction Productivity Roadmap
c
c
1970s -1980s
“In the late 1970s…HDB…build over 50,000 units using prefabricated and industrialised methods of construction.”
Minister Khaw Boon Wan, 2014
c
Setting the stage and closing the substitution cost gap
Changing the way we build
2nd Construction Productivity Roadmap
Key Milestones in Raising Productivity
Our Productivity Journey
Foreign Worker Levy
MYEMYE
MYEMYE
MYEMYE
MYEMYEMYE
CONSTRUCTIONWORKS
CONTRACT
$100m
Man-year allocated to Main Contractors based on their
project contract value
$180$250 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300
$230
$350
$450$550 $600 $650 $700 $700
Jul-11
Jul-12
Jul-13
Jul-14
Jul-15
Jul-16
R1 (Higher Skilled)
Raise Manpower Cost to Drive Technology Substitution1
Quota control Price mechanism+Man-Year Entitlement
(MYE) Quota
Note: Currency in SGD
Jul-17
Jul-18
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
MinimumBuildable Design Score
Apply toArchitectsEngineers( )
MinimumConstructability Score
(Apply to Builders)
Downstream – Construction StageUpstream – Design Stage
Pro
gre
ssiv
e
Enh
ance
me
nts
BuildabilityThe extent to which a building design facilitates ease of construction
ConstructabilityThe extent to which labour-efficient technologies and methods are adopted downstream during construction
Set Minimum Standard through the Buildability Framework2
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
2011 2013 2014 2015 2017
Voluntary BIM submission
Mandatory BIM submission for new building projects> 20,000 m2
Mandatory BIM submission for new building projects> 5,000 m2
2010
2013
2015 andbeyond
Drive BIM Adoption through Regulation to Level Up Industry2
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
ConstructionProductivity
and CapabilityFund (CPCF)
Workforce Training andUpgrading (WTU) Fund
Continuous Education Training (CET) for existing workforce
Enhanced BCA-IndustryBuilt Environment
Scholarship / Sponsorship
Attract high quality entrants
Building InformationModelling (BIM) Fund
Enhance integration and promote collaborative BIM
ProductivityInnovationProjects (PIP)
Encourage technology adoption and process re-engineering
Mechanisation Credit(MechC) Scheme
Encourage mechanization and reduce labour reliance
Capability Building
Integration of Value Chain
Technology Adoption
Incentivise Private Sector to be 1st Movers3
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Workforce Training andUpgrading (WTU) Fund
Continuous Education Training (CET) for existing workforce
Enhanced BCA-IndustryBuilt Environment
Scholarship / Sponsorship
Attract high quality entrants
Capability Building
Incentivise Private Sector to be 1st Movers3
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
1. Training and assessment in
CoreTrade Scheme and Multi-Skilling Scheme
2. Selected PMET* courses related to
productivity
Up to90%
ConstructionProductivity
and CapabilityFund (CPCF)
*Professional Managerial Executive and Technical Personnel
ConstructionProductivity
and CapabilityFund (CPCF) Productivity
InnovationProjects (PIP)
Encourage technology adoption and process re-engineering
Mechanisation Credit(MechC) Scheme
Encourage mechanization and reduce labour reliance
Technology Adoption
Incentivise Private Sector to be 1st Movers3
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Productivity Innovation Project Scheme
• Co-fund up to 70% of cost of game- changing
technology or process improvement
• Each application must yield > 20% productivity improvement
• Funding cap per application up to $10 mil*, but must yield 40% productivity improvement
Mechanisation Credit Scheme
• Co-fund site mechanisation through purchase & lease of equipment
• Co-fund up to 70% of cost of
equipment
• Each approved application must
yield > 20% productivity
improvement
*Must create great impact in driving productivity gain in the industry
ConstructionProductivity
and CapabilityFund (CPCF)
Building InformationModelling (BIM) Fund
Enhance integration and promote collaborative BIM
Integration of Value Chain
Incentivise Private Sector to be 1st Movers3
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
• Co-fund up to 70% of cost of
adopting BIM into work processes.
• To enjoy up to 70% funding support, the firm must form a team of > 3 different disciplines, including the main contractor
• Each application must achieved >30% improvement in the project KPI*
*Example for KPI is time taken to resolve Request for Information (RFI) between 2 parties.
Image: Synergis Engineering
Architect
MEP Structure
Construction
• Adoption by single companies to defray the hardware, software and training costs.
Incentivise Private Sector to be 1st Movers3
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
ConstructionProductivity
and CapabilityFund (CPCF)
Committed $480mil
out of $800mil
About 9000
firms benefitted
More than 90%
small firms and medium enterprises
Driving Productivity through Public Sector Procurement4
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Driving Productivity through Public Sector Procurement4
Quality Price / Fee Productivity
Quality Fee Method (QFM)(procurement of consultancy services)
Increment in Productivity weightage:
Price Quality Method (PQM)(procurement of construction services)
Increment in Productivity weightage:
9% - 12% 20% 3% - 6% 10%
Tender
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Nurture a Pipeline of Building Professionals5
Executive Programmes Academic Programmes Specialist Cert. Programmes
Pro
fess
ion
al L
eve
lA
sso
ciat
e Le
vel
Executive Development Programme Postgraduate Degree Specialist Certificates
DegreeSeminars
Specialist Diploma
Diploma
Stanford-BCA Advanced Management Program: VDC LeadershipEnhancing Construction Productivity & Management (Kyoto University)
Workshop on Game-Changing Technologies (Build Smart Conference)
BCA-IFMA FM Conference
Master in International Construction Management with major in Construction Productivity (University of Florida, USA)
Bachelor of Construction Management (Building), Bachelor of Civil Engineering (University of Newcastle, Australia)
PBU, MET & PPVC courses
VDC courses / workshops
Prefabricating our Future (PBU) Workshop
Certification Course in BIM Management
BIM Modelling courses
BIM Planning
S. Diploma & Advanced Cert. in Construction ProductivityS. Diploma in DfMA
S. Diploma in BIM; S. Diploma in VDC
S. Diploma in Lean Construction
Diploma in Construction IT
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Attracting and Building a Core of Young Talent6
Government-Industry Scholarships/Sponsorships
Rebranding Roadmap+
How Did We Address the Productivity Problem?
Productivity Target: Annual average of 2-3% productivity improvement by 2020
Site productivity is defined as the floor area completed per manday
0.380 0.3810.384
0.389
0.395
0.403
0.411
0.419
0.375
0.380
0.385
0.390
0.395
0.400
0.405
0.410
0.415
0.420
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
m2
pe
r m
and
ay
1.5%
0.8%0.3%
1.3%
2.0%
Year-on-Year Improvement in Site Productivity (building works)
2.0%
2.0%
10% cumulative
improvement since 2010
Encouraging Progress Made
2011 2014 2016
2011
2% Higher Skilled R1 Workers
2016
40% Higher SkilledR1 Workers
Ratio of Higher Skilled R1 Workers in the Industry
Improved Workforce Profile
2%
20%
40%
Encouraging Progress Made
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Larger Consultants Smaller Consultants Larger Contractors Smaller Contractors
14%
36%
50%
58%
25%
17%
15%
50%
35%14%
33%
53%
LargerConsultants
SmallerConsultants
LargerContractors
SmallerContractors
Adopted Collaborative BIM
AdoptedBasic BIM
Have notadopted BIM
Types of BIM Adoption in Singapore
No
. of
Firm
s
Increased Adoption of BIM across Construction Value Chain
Note: Classification of firm sizes are done according to Singapore’s public sector procurement framework and BCA’s Contractors Registry System (CRS)
Note: Basic BIM refers to BIM adoption at the firm level; Collaborative BIM refers to BIM adoption beyond firm level
Encouraging Progress Made
Sustain the Momentum
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Moving work offsite will improve productivity in 3 ways
• Controlled offsite environment• Scope for automation of offsite work• Scope for offshoring of offsite work
Designfor Manufacturing(off-site and automation)
and Assembly(on-site)
Changing the Way We Build 40% DfMA Adoption by
2020
Benefits of DfMA
High quality
Faster construction
For the industry For the public
Less workers on site
Greater automation in factory
Less dust
Less noise
Fewer delivery trips
Moving towards a more productive construction sector, while reducing disamenities to the public
Conducive Working Environment
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Continuum of Prefabrication and DfMA
Prefab Components
Stru
ctu
ral
MEP
Arc
hit
ect
ura
l
Structural Steel / Advanced Precast / Hybrid
PBUs
Advanced Prefab Systems Integrated Sub-assemblies Fully Integrated Assemblies
PPVC
PPVC
Precast Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction
(PPVC)
Wallpaper Engineered timber floor
On-site Dry Applied Finishes
Prefab MEP Deck
Prefab Module with Platform/ Catwalk
Manpower Savings [Project Level]35%
40%
20%10%
70%
Manpower Savings [Trade Level]45% 60%
Prefab Ceiling Module/ Prefab Plant
Prefinished Surfaces
Flexible Water Pipe/ Sprinkler Dropper
Mass Engineered Timber (MET)
Components: Incremental Improvement…
…Integrated Assemblies: Game-Changing Improvement
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
30%
Modules complete with internal
finishes, fixtures and fittings are
manufactured in factories and
transported to site for installation in
a Lego-like manner Photo: Crowne Plaza Hotel
Substantial quantum of reduction in on-site manpower
Better construction environment
Why PPVC?
Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction
What’s PPVC?
Mass Engineered Timber
MET refers to engineered wood products
that exhibit improved structural integrity
for various construction purposes. Some
examples include Cross Laminated Timber
(CLT), Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam)
and Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL).
What’s MET?
Increase construction productivity, faster construction time & reduce
manpower on-site
Sustainable construction
(reduced carbon emission, less environmental impact & reduce wastage)
Why MET?
CLT is an engineered
structural material
comprising layers of
wood stacked
perpendicularly to each
other. The layers are
bonded with structural
adhesives
Glulam is produced in
a similar fashion as
CLT but with grain
aligned in one
direction.
Courtesy: UB
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
DfMA Technologies
Adoption of PPVC atCrowne Plaza Changi Airport Hotel
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Video: OUL & Dragages
Karma House, UK
(Residential)
Habitat 67, Canada
(Residential)
By Arch Moshe Safdie
STEEL
PPVC
19 STOREYS
CONCRETE
PPVC
12 STOREYS
Victoria Hall, London
19 STOREYS
STEEL
PPVC
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
PPVC buildings can achieve a variety of building forms
Photo: Tower Trip
Photo: ArchiTravel Photo: FreeIndex
Photo: Host Wembley
Photo: BCA
Photo: BCA
Greenwich Creekside (UK) Apex House (UK) Olympic Way (UK)
21
STOREYS
28
STOREYS
20
STOREYS
Oval & Triangular shaped floor plan &
curved facade designs
External bolted balconies & use of
various facade elements
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
PPVC buildings can achieve a variety of building forms
Non-rectangular floor layout
Photo: Essentialliving.co.uk
Image: HTA.co.uk
Photo: World Architecture News
Image: Democracybrent.gov.uk
Image: HTA.co.uk
Photo: HTA.co.uk
24 projects
(4 completed , 20 on-going)
Development types:
Hostel, Nursing Home,
Hotel, Dormitory,
Residential, Industrial,
Commercial etc.
PPVC
10-Storey Crowne Plaza
Hotel Extension
Completed in 2016
9-Storey Woodlands Care
Home
Completed in 2017
13-Storey
NTU Nanyang Crescent Hostel
Completed in 2017
12-Storey Wisteria
Commercial & Condominium
To be completed in 2018
40-Storey
Clement Canopy
Condominium
To be completed in 2019
COMPLETED
COMPLETED
ON-GOING
ON-GOING
COMPLETED
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Singapore Projects Adopting DfMA Technologies
13-Storey NTU North Hill
Hostel
Completed in 2016
COMPLETED
Photo: Dragages Photo: NTU
Photo: Dragages
Photo: NTU
Photo: NorthernOne Dev.Photo: UOL
ON-GOING
36-Storey
Parc Riviera Condominium
To be completed in 2019
Photo: EL Development.
Adoption of MET atNTU Sports Hall, The Wave Project
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Video: NTU, B19 & Struts Building
COMPLETED COMPLETED
BCA SkyLab Visitor Lounge
Completed in 2016
NTU Sports Hall
Completed in 2016
3-Storey JTC Launchpad
Light Industrial Building
Completed in 2016
Singapore Sustainability Academy
Completed in 2017
10 projects
(4 completed , 6 on-going)
Development types:
Institutional, Office,
Industrial, Sports Hall,
Recreational, Dormitory etc.
COMPLETED
COMPLETED
DESIGN STAGE
NTU Academic Building
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Singapore Projects Adopting DfMA Technologies
MET
Photo: BCA Photo: NTU
Photo: JTCPhoto: CDL Photo: NTU
Our Target
To achieve the target
of 40% adoption
rate for DfMA
technologies and
BIM/VDC by 2020
Advancing BIM and VDC Adoption
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD)Integrating design to fabrication,
logistic, site management and commissioning
Virtual Design and Construction (VDC)Build Virtual, then Real
to improve planning, resolve clashes, before physical construction
Building Information Modelling (BIM)Digitalisation, visualisation,
simulation and optimisation of design
Advancing BIM and VDC Adoption
Co-created a wide spectrum of BCA BIM Guides with industry BIM Managers
FIRST fully integrated, large-scale immersive and experiential learning
facility in SE Asia for the built environment sector to
drive VDC & BIM
Virtual Design and Construction: Build twice - first virtual, then real
Riding the Challenges to Transform the Sector
Public Sector Take The Lead
Making productivity improvement as KPI
Identify pilot projects
Adopt game-changing technologies
• Government must walk the talk and spearhead the adoption of productive technologies to get the private sector moving
*The agencies above constitute up to 90% of total public sector building and civil engineering works
Key Takeways
Balancing Legislations and Incentives
Carrot
Stick
• Combination of regulatory levers and financial incentives is crucial to ensure success in transforming the industry
Active communication and feedback between Government and industry is essential to achieve desired balance between “carrot” and “stick”
Key Takeways
Photo: Coaching Journey
• Rejuvenation of our workforce – 3,000 BCA-Industry Scholarship and
Sponsorship Recipients in recent years…
Capability Building is Critical
Key Takeways
We must continue to do more to bring young talents into the industry
Image: Alphacoders
Government Industry
DfMA
IDD
Thank You