4
DPD/DPV Selection T. Polk, S. Kent

DPD/DPV Selection

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DPD/DPV Selection. T. Polk, S. Kent. Summary. Compliance ratings Chairs developed a compliance “matrix” Editors submitted their responses Denis submitted analysis of other 3 matrices Strawpoll results 51 votes: SCVP 26; OCSP 15; DVCS 8; CVP 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: DPD/DPV Selection

DPD/DPV Selection

T. Polk, S. Kent

Page 2: DPD/DPV Selection

Summary

• Compliance ratings– Chairs developed a compliance “matrix”– Editors submitted their responses– Denis submitted analysis of other 3 matrices

• Strawpoll results– 51 votes: SCVP 26; OCSP 15; DVCS 8; CVP 2

• Chairs analyzed both strawpoll and matrices to select the winner

Page 3: DPD/DPV Selection

Basis of Selection

• The protocol must have adequate support among implementers.

• The protocol MUST satisfy the requirements specified in RFC 3379 (or be close and readily upgraded).

• The protocol must be mature enough for completion soon.

Page 4: DPD/DPV Selection

Result

• SCVP was the best choice– Had a majority in the strawpoll– Most compliant protocol in Denis’ analysis

(SCVP, OCSP and DVCS only)– Several post-3379 drafts, and the WG has

implementation experience