Upload
riley-birch
View
234
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dosimeters, calibration and uncertainty
Radcal CorporationPaul SundeMonrovia, CA
Modern Dose Sensor Diversity
Ion Chambers (nGy – kGy 10keV – MeV)
Solid State Multi-sensors (dose, kV, time, hvl, filt)
Solid State Dose only
Radcal’s Mfg. and Calibration Laboratory
Certified ISO 9001:2008 (TUV since 1995) IEC ISO/IEC 17025:2005 ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 All products CE marked
Direct traceability to NIST (USA) – Air Kerma PTB (Germany) – Air Kerma Swedish National Laboratory – High Voltage Proficiency Tested – NIST & Secondary Labs
Dose Calibration Chain
National Laboratory
Radcal Primary Ion Chamber Standards
Working/Secondary Standards
Std1 Std2 Std3 Std4 Std5 Std6
Proficiency Testing
National LaboratoryTransfer Standard Secondary Lab
RadcalCal Lab
- Lab calibrates transfer std.
- Ship to Radcal for calibration
- Radcal calibrates & issues report
- Return to lab for re-calibration
- Lab Issues proficiency report
Customer Traceability Chain
National Laboratory
Radcal
Customer
Certificate of Conformance
Certified Calibration
Radcal Certificate of Conformance
Motivation Verify equipment meets published specifications Preserve component interchangeability
Process Test electronics (control unit) – verify performance
and accuracy over full dynamic range Independently test sensors with reference standard
electronics for accuracy and energy dependence Verify sensor & electronics combination, but do not
adjust.
Air Kerma Uncertainty BudgetNIST & PTB
National Standard ~1%
Radcal (1s)
Transfer measurements 0.50%
Long-term stability 1.00%
Short-term reproducibility 0.50%
Temperature: 0.25 ºC 0.08%
Pressure: 1mB 0.10%
Geometry & positioning 0.20%
Charge: 0.5% 0.50%
Beam quality* 0.25%
Quadrature Sum 1.5%
Total Uncertainty Radcal
@ 95% Confidence (2s) 2.9%
TUR (test uncertainty ratio)
Note: desirable TUR is >4Implies RMS <1.25%
Typical Dose measurmentDisplay resolution 0.10%Calibration uncertainty of standard (1sigma) 1.50%Reproducibility of reference readings 0.10%Positioning uncertainty (80 cm ±0.1) 0.25%Temperature (±0.5 °C) 0.34%Pressure (±.2 kPa) 0.40%
RMS 1.61%
Published Uncertainty 5%TUR 3.1
Beam standardization
Geometry – IEC-61267 “Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics”.
Collimator 1
Trans Chamber 1
Added FiltCollimator 2
HVL Filters.
Collimator 3
Trans Chamber 2
Laser
Beam Splitter
Prisim
Radcal Air Kerma Standards
3-terminal guarding
< 5e-15 A leakage with 300 VDC bias
Negligible stem effects
< ±5% energy dependence over rated energy range
2nGy to >20 Gy
Rates from nGy/s to >mGy/s
Energies from 10 keV to 2 MV
Recent Standard Chamber Set
Diagnostic Energy Response (RQR & RQA)
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
Re
spo
nse
hvl (mm Al)
RC6M(PTB Calibration)
Orange: W-anode Blue: Mo-anode Pink Area = Radcal Spec, Light Orange=Typical Mammo Energies
10 40
7.5 keV
Ion Chamber Response for low energy x-rays
American College of Radiology: ±1% 0.2-0.6 mm Al hvl
Mammographic Energy ResponseRadcal 10X5-6M (DeWerd et al.)
±2%
Diode Energy Response
Diode Mo-Mo 30uEnergy Response
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Tube Voltage (kV)
No
rma
lize
d R
es
po
ns
e
Uncompensated Compensated
Diode Mo-Mo 30uEnergy Response
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Tube Voltage (kV)
No
rma
lize
d R
es
po
ns
e
Uncompensated Compensated
Diode Energy Response
Diode Energy Response
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Re
spo
nse
Tube Voltage (kVp)
Compensated Diode ResponseUnknown Anode-Filter
Mo/Mo
Mo/Rh
Rh/Rh
W/Ag
W/Rh
Diode Energy Response
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Re
spo
nse
Tube Voltage (kVp)
Compensated Diode ResponseKnown Anode-Filter
Mo/Mo
Mo/Rh
Rh/Rh
W/Ag
W/Rh
Diode Energy Response – Auto Corrected via kV & hvl
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
Re
sp
on
se
Tube Voltage (kVp)
Diode Energy ResponseKV & Filtration Auto Corrected
Mo/Mo
Mo/Rh
W/Ag
Equipment TolerancesIEC 61674 – “Dosimeters with ionization chambers and/or semiconductor detectors as used in x-ray diagnostic imaging"
Performance Characteristics Limit of Variation
Air Kerma Reproducibility 1%
Resolution < 1%
Stabilization 2%
Leakage currents (<1%/min) ---
Stability 2%
Accumulated dose stability 1%
RMS 3%
Equipment TolerancesIEC 61674 – “Dosimeters with ionization chambers and/or semiconductor detectors as used in x-ray diagnostic imaging"
Influence Quantities Limit of VariationRadiation Quality 5%Air Kerma Rate 2%Incidence angle (± 5°) 3%Operating Voltage 2%Air Pressure 2%Temperature and Humidity 3%EMC 5%Field size 3%
RMS 9%
Equipment TolerancesIEC 61674 – “Dosimeters with ionization chambers and/or semiconductor detectors as used in x-ray diagnostic imaging"
Limit of VariationInfluence Quantities 9%
Performance Characteristics 3%
Total RMS 10%
Summary
Select dose sensors to match your requirements Acceptable uncertainty - QA checks vs. acceptance
testing Energy range – Mammography vs. conventional, Geometric response - fluoro backscatter, CT & tomo Energy response – acceptable uncertainty Dynamic Range - scatter & leakage vs. pulsed fluoro
Summary
Understand the sensor & associated electronics Trigger thresholds – minimum dose rate Maximum dose rate – pulsed fluoro Opaque – interfere with AEC Linearity over the range of application Use of automatic vs. manual temp & pressure
corrections Time to come to thermal equilibrium
Paul SundeRadcal CorporationMonrovia, California USAwww.radcal.com
Thank You!
ISO/IEC 17025:2005 ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994
Accredited
ISO 9001:2008 Certified