Doomed Sects

  • View

  • Download

Embed Size (px)

Text of Doomed Sects

  • 8/13/2019 Doomed Sects


    SalafiTalk.Net - Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim

    SalafiTalk.Net Affairs of Aqeedah

    Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim

    Search ===>


    Posted By Topic:Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim-- page: 12

    abdul.azeem 03-22-2008 @ 12:08 PM Notify Admin about this post

    Abu Abd Ar Rahman Abd Al Adheem Ibn Faheem ibn Zia ibn Ma'een(KSA/ Bangalore,



    Posts: 305

    Joined: Nov 2002

    Ibn al-Qayyim Declares Soofeeyah From 72 Sects Doomed To Hellfire!

    Introduction:-Neo-Soofeeyah resorted to wrap the taqleed-strand around their defenses of those whom they considered

    deviant, astray, salafee...!

    While it was an obligation to return to the truth when they have the entire Qur'aan and the clear Sunnah in opposition to their

    beliefs! How on earth a sane Muslim can justify the fake stories from a book like fadaail-e-aamaal and rest of soofee fiction?

    Soofees are truly insane!

    Out of the vast treasure left behind by ibn al-Qayyim you had ONLY the disputed Kitab-ar-Ruh to hang onto? Then you built

    hanbalee sufism and shamelessly included Ibn al-Qayyim amongst them?

    I will list insha Allaah what the research of the scholars has been with regards to this book and the radd of Ibn al-Qayyim

    upon the Soofees and their khuraafee practises so that there remains no doubt and confusion with the permission of Allaahregarding Ibn al-Qayyim and his aqeedah! (1 of 34)3/4/2010 11:34:13

    SalafiTalk.Net Google Search,%20%27375%27,%20%27420%27),%20%27375%27,%20%27420%27),%20%27375%27,%20%27420%27),%20%27400%27,%20%27300%27);
  • 8/13/2019 Doomed Sects


    SalafiTalk.Net - Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim

    There are six important things to be observed.

    Firstly:- The soofees attempt to refute the salafees using their Mu`tazilee/Kullaabee/Asharee usool. If you were to ponder with

    slightest of justice and fairness, it is from the salafee usool to reject anything that opposes the Qur'aan and the Sunnah as

    understood by the Salaf-us-Saalih; even if it comes from the most greatest of their scholars!

    Secondly:- The soofees pick up isolated statements and disputed ascriptions of books/ statements upon certain Ulamaa and

    build their whole manhaj around it. If they were to gather all the statements of the same scholar in question, his usool then

    they would miserably fail in proving their deception!

    Thirdly:- The one whom they claim to blind follow in furoo, they oppose the same one in usool. The one whom they claim to

    blind follow in creed, they strenuously oppose him in fiqh. Then the one whom they claim to blind follow in hadeeth and its

    sciences, they would vigorously oppose him in creed.

    As for the ahl-us-Sunnah, then they follow the Qur'aan and the Sunnah as understood by the salaf and leave whatever

    opposes it!

    Fourthly:- The soofees claim to be hanafees and the hanafee usool renders Khabr-al-Waahid even if it be SAHEEH reported

    by Bukhaaree/Muslim does not reach ilm yaqeeni. Then how do they accept kitaab-ar-Ruh and most of the narrations in it

    relating to dreams and events that are extremely weak?

    And this related to the aspects of Aqeedah and they have no hesitation in accepting it, while they reject Kharb-ul-Ahhaad in

    the matters of fiqh.

    Astonishingly, they also reject certain aspects of aqeedah of

    ahl-us-Sunnah with an excuse of Khabr-ul-Ahhaad!

    Fifthly:- a)Even if they press most vehemently upon Shaykh Bakr rahimahullaah's research and his stance with regards to

    Kitab-ar-Ruh, then they should follow him conclusively and do not draw conclusions about Ibn al-Qayyim until they have fair

    knowledge of what he wrote in Kitab-ar-Ruh-Wa-Nafs-al-Kabeer.

    b) They should also clarify if this book was written before I'laam-ul-Muwaqqi`een ann` Rabbil-Aalameen based on clear

    evidences. I would appreciate even if you can prove to me this book was written after Zaad-al-Maad, let alone I'laam.

    c) Inform the Aqeedah of Ibn al-Qayyim and publicise it based on all his available works and dont restrict to one book.

    Sixthly:- When it is only the Salafee Scholars who warn against this book, then i t does not befit the sects in opposition except

    that they prove based on evidences from the Qur'aan & the Sunnah as understood by the Salaf-us-Saalih following the rules

    of science of hadeeth. Not that the book in and itself it a PROOF and HUJJAH!

    [See Kitaabun Hazzara Min-al-Ulamaa of Mash`hoor Hasan Volume 2 where he has listed Kitab-ar-Ruh]

    I begin with what Ibn al-Qayyim rahimahullah said in his most famous

    book of Usool, I'laam-ul-Muwaqqi`een ann` Rabbil Aalameen about Soofeeyah!

    This should send shock waves around soofee circles and let the blood

    in those hands clot that have given secret bayah to their fake shaykhs

    by the permission of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic!!! (2 of 34)3/4/2010 11:34:13

  • 8/13/2019 Doomed Sects


    SalafiTalk.Net - Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim (3 of 34)3/4/2010 11:34:13

  • 8/13/2019 Doomed Sects


    SalafiTalk.Net - Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim

    Ibn al-Qayyim rahimahullaah said:

    And such is the plight of these (72) innovated sects (that are upon this path of baathil ta`weel) with regards to the Sharee'ah.

    Each of these sects misunderstood Shareeah in a way different from the other sects, claiming their understanding to be that

    which was intended by the Saahib-ush-Shara`(meaning the Messenger of Allaah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam). This (baathil

    Ta`weel) ruptured the Shareeah apiece, such that even the remnants did not reflet the shadow of its original self.

    The Saahib-ush-Shara` (Salwaathullaahi wa salaamuhu alayhi) knew that the like of this would follow so he Sallallahu alaihi

    wa sallam said: "My Ummah will devide into 73 sects, all of them wil l be in the hell fire, except for one. He meant by this

    "one" the group which follows the Sharee'ah (Qur`aan & the Sunnah) upon dhaahir, apparently and does not make ta`weel to

    change its intended meaning.

    When you reflect upon the amount of fasaad that has occured in the Shar`eeah during this time, you will find that most of itwas from the direction of ta`weel(explaning the Shar`eeah with other than its intended meaning, that which was understood

    by the Sahabah), and it will be starkly apparent to you that the illustration of the Messenger of Allaah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa

    Sallam is Saheeh (in describing the 72 sects doomed for hellfire and only one group being upon the truth).


    And the first and foremost to modify this greatest of cure (meaning the Shar`eeah

    explained by the Messenger of Allaah as understood by the Salaf-us-Saalih without

    Ta`weel) were: al-Khawaarij, then Mutazilah, then Ashaairah, then the

    Sufee`ah. Then came Abu Haamid (meaning al-ghazaalee) who caused the valley tolandslide over!

    [See I'laam Volume 6 page 191,192 ~ Checking Of Shaykh Mash`hoor Hasan]

    What endorses this fact further is that a very similar saying has been documented by Ibn Rushd in his work,al-Kashf ann`

    Minhaaj-il-Adillah Fee Aqaaidil-Millah where he refutes these baathil sects of deviation.

    To be continued Insha Allaah! (4 of 34)3/4/2010 11:34:13

  • 8/13/2019 Doomed Sects


    SalafiTalk.Net - Kitab-ar-Ruh - Its Attribution To Ibn Al-Qayyim


Search related