Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DON’T PANIC!. Understanding the 2011 Accountability Changes. Clicker Trivia. more than you wanted to know about accountability. State Accountability 2011 Overview. What content areas are evaluated?. Reading. Writing. Social Studies. Science. Math. All content areas are evaluated. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
DON’T PANIC!Understanding the 2011 Accountability Changes
Clicker Triviamore than you wanted to know about accountability
State Accountability 2011 Overview
What content areas are evaluated?
Reading Math WritingScience Social Studies
All content areas are evaluated.
What is measured?
% Met Standard
What grades are evaluated?
Grades 3-11
3 4 5 6 7 8 109 11
What are the possible ratings for a campus/district?
Exemplary
Recognized
Academically Acceptable
Academically Unacceptable
No New Ratings in 2012!
What are the 2011 standards?
Math
Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Writing
80
80
80
80
80
90
90
90
80
80
70
65
60
70
70
M TAKS Acc Alt
What tests are evaluated?2011 is the Last Year for TAKS!
What students are evaluated?
Every student in the accountability subset* on a campus is evaluated in the All Students group.
*Students enrolled on Snapshot Day (last Friday in October) and on Testing Day.
African American
Hispanic White
Economically Disadvantaged
Students in the following groups may be evaluated again if the group is large enough
Groups are large enough if they meet the Minimum Size Requirement (MSR)
30 10% 50/ /
Dropout Rate
Completion Rate
What other indicators are evaluated?
High schools and Districts with 12th Grade
Middle schools and DistrictsStandard = 75% Standard = 1.6%
State Accountability 2011 Additional Updates
Commended Performance
STANDARDS
SUBJECTS
STUDENTS
ANY HELP?
15% for Recognized, 25% for Exemplary
Reading/ELA and Mathematics
All Student Group and Economically Disadvantaged Students (if meets MSR)
No (TPM, RI, and Exceptions will not be applied)
All S
tude
nt G
roup
38
37.5%
EXEMPLARY
ELL Progress Indicator
STANDARD
SUBJECTS
STUDENTS
ANY HELP?
Meets 60%
Reading
All Students (MSR = 30) Students who tested in at least one of the specified assessments
Required Improvement & Exceptions
LEP
LEP
LEP
LEPM1
M1
M2
M2
M2
M1
LEP
LEP
M1
M1
M2
M2
M2
M1
LEP
TAKS TELPAS# Met Standard # Met Criteria
M1 M1 M1 M2 M2 LEP LEPM1 M1 M1 M2 M2 M2 LEP LEP LEP
79 77.8%
What’s Happening with TPM?For 2011 state accountability, the commissioner will consider several
options in the use of TPM to ensure that student performance is acknowledged and that the state accountability system remains transparent.
Suspension of the use of TPM; Continued use of TPM in state accountability, but only for
districts that elect to use it; or Include additional safeguards:
o Applying performance floors,o Counting each student who fails, but it projected to pass as a fraction of
a passer,o Prohibiting TPM to be used for the same measure in a subsequent year,o Limiting the number of measures for which TPM can be used in a given
year, and o Limiting which rating categories can use TPM.
Ethnicity/Race Data Collection and Reporting
For the 2009–10 school year For the 2010-11 school yearTEA implemented the new federal standard for the collection of ethnicity and race information beginning with PEIMS data collected for the 2009–10 school year.
Beginning with the 2010-11 data collection, race / ethnicity data will be collected using the new definitions only.
2009–10 school year only, PEIMS collected race and ethnicity information using both the old definitions and the new federal definitions.
2010-11, PEIMS will collect race / ethnicity information using the new definitions only.
State accountability, federal accountability, and the AEIS and its related reports (such as the School Report Card and Snapshot) will use the old race / ethnicity definitions for the 2009-10 reporting cycle and for 2010 accountability.
The assessment answer documents will collect race / ethnicity information using the new definitions only (pre-coded from PEIMS).
State accountability, federal accountability, and AEIS and related reports will use the new definitions for all the current year (2010-11) indicators for the 2011 cycle.
Final recommendations for the selection of the race / ethnicity student groups to be evaluated for state accountability ratings for 2011 will be made by 2011 accountability advisory groups.
AEA Accountability Basics 2011TAKS Progress Indicator
• The TAKS Progress indicator standard will increase from 50% to 55%.
• TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate results will be combined with TAKS and TAKS (Accommodated ) results to determine AEA ratings.
Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-12) and Completion Rate II Indicators
• The Annual Dropout Rate indicator standard remains 20.0%.
• The Completion Rate II indicator standard remains 60.0%.
English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Indicator
• The ELL Progress Indicator standard will be 55%.• Required Improvement (RI) will be calculated.• The All Students group will be evaluated if the minimum size requirement
is met.
Federal Accountability OverviewAdequate Yearly Progress
What content areas are evaluated?
Reading Math
What is measured?
% Proficient % Participate
What grades are evaluated?
3 4 5 6 7 8 10
3-8 & 10
What are the standards?
2011-12 2012-13 2013-142010-112009-10
6775
8392
100
% Proficient
Math
7380
87 93
Reading
%
of students must pass
in 2014
What tests are evaluated?
TAKS TAKSAcc
TAKSM
TAKSALT
TAKSLAT
What students are evaluated?
Every student in the accountability subset* on a campus is evaluated in the All Students group.
*Students enrolled on Snapshot Day (last Friday in October) and on Testing Day.
African American
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
Special Education
Limited English Proficient (LEP)
Students in the following groups may be evaluated again if the group is large enough
Groups are large enough if they meet the Minimum Size Requirement (MSR)
50 10% 200/ /
Attendance Rate
Graduation Rate
What other indicators are evaluated?
High schools and Districts with 12th Grade
Elementary and Middle schools and Districts without 12th Grade
Standard = 75% Standard = 90%
Federal Accountability OverviewAdditional Information
Graduation RateThere are now 5 ways to meet the standard!
5
1 Meet the statewide 4-year Graduation Rate goal of 90.0%
Class of 2009 X
Class of 2009
2 Meet the 4-year Annual Graduation Rate Target of 75%
X
Graduation Rate:
3 Meet the 4-year Safe Harbor Target (a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the prior year rate and 90.0%)
Class of 2009
Graduation Rate:
Class of 2008
60%
59.4%Improvement Required: 90 – 59.4 = 30.6, 30.6 x .1 = 3.1% X
Actual Improvement: 0.6%
Graduation Rate:
Class of 2009
Graduation Rate:
Class of 2008
60%
59.4%
X
4 Meet the 4-year Improvement Target (a 1.0% increase from the prior year 4-year Graduation Rate)
Actual Improvement: 0.6%
Class of 2008
5 Meet the 5-year longitudinal Annual Graduation Rate Target of 80% (for the class of 2008).
‘08 ‘08 ‘08 ‘08 ‘08
Graduation Rate = 50%
‘09 ‘09 ‘09
5 Year Graduation Rate = 80%
Student Groups Evaluated
In 2012, all student groups (that meet MSR) will be evaluated for AYP Graduation Rate!
PREVIEW
For graduation rate, the LEP student group will include current LEP students plus students formerly identified as LEP during any of their high school years (Ever HS LEP)
LEP
Texas Projection Measure (TPM)
TPM will be used for TAKS-M in grades 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10
3 4 6 7 10
Federal CapsHow, exactly, do these work?!
M Alt
A Recent Change…in 2009
2% Cap Limit = 3
M M M
M M
M
M
MM
M Alt
2% Cap Limit = 3
M M M
M M
M
M
MM X
A Recent Change…in 2010M Alt
Federal Cap Process is Unchanged
Alt
1%1% TAKS Alt Cap – students are selected randomly from TAKS Alt proficient results
M
2%2% TAKS M Cap – Combination method is used to select TAKS M proficient results
The district’s AYP participation count for Reading/ELA and Math will continue to be used to calculate the caps.
1% TAKS Alt Cap Limit = 2,386 x .01 = 24
2% TAKS M Cap Limit = 2,386 x .02 = 48
1% TAKS Alt Cap Limit = 2,379 x .01 = 24
2% TAKS M Cap Limit = 2,379 x .02 = 48
Reading/ELA
Math
TAKS Alt TAKS M
Alt Alt Alt
Alt Alt Alt
Alt Alt Alt
Alt
TAKS Alt TAKS M
Alt Alt Alt
Alt Alt Alt
Alt Alt Alt
Alt
Alt AltAlt
Alt XAltAlt
Alt Alt
Alt
XAlt XAlt
XAlt
XAltXAlt XAlt
P
EP P
P P
P
E
E
E
Alt
1%Step 1: Students are selected from the Met Standard group.Step 2: Students are selected from the Did Not Meet Standard but are on track to meet the standard.
HS
MS
EL
1.
2.
3.
M
2%Campus Priority List
TEA SortCampus Priority List
District Sort
AYP Rules – Before Students Are Selected
Snapshot
Test Day
The application of the accountability subset
MSRMinimum Size Requirement for each student group
Determine if student groups not meeting standard are eligible for Safe Harbor or TPM
M2%
HS
MS
EL
1.
2.
3.
Selecting Proficient Students – Reading/ELA
# Meet AYP – Reading/ELA
# Meet AYP – Reading/ELA
# Meet AYP – Reading/ELA
Appeal Appeals to campus ranking or cap process will not be considered
Districts may not Meet AYP after the cap process since priority is given to campuses meeting AYP
M
2%
ELMSHS
Campuses given a higher priority for the selection of students may require all available proficient student results
No exceptions to the 2% Cap
2011 Accountability WorkbookPlanning Tool
Includes Worksheets To:
Identify student groups at risk of not meeting the 2011 standards.
Analyze commended rates for the All Student and Economically Disadvantaged groups (2006-2010)
60Analyze ELL Progress Indicator results longitudinally at the campus- and student-level.
Campuses with Additional Campus Improvement Plan (CIP) Requirements
Formerly known as Technical Assistant Teams (TAT)
Academical
ly
Acceptable
TAKS Acc
AltM
6065
70
RI & EP
Region XIII Potential Pre-AU List
Academical
ly
Acceptable
TAKS Acc
AltM
6065
70
RI & EP
• February 17 Update on Accountability Development
• April 19 Accountability Decisions for 2011
• June 16 Accountability Manuals – State and AYP
• August 18 Accountability Results for 2011
When we’ll know more…
