Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Donald J. Sefcik, DO, MBA Senior Associate Dean
College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University
• In-Service Examination (ISE) scores What do they represent? How should you interpret them? What should you do with them?
• Techniques used to raise ISE scores • Recommendations
Emergency Medicine • Hern et al (2009); Cheng (2008); Gillen (1997) Family Medicine • Sevensma SC, Navarre G, Richards RK (2008) Internal Medicine • McDonald, Zeger & Kolars (2008) • Garilbaldi et al (2002) OB/Gyne • Withiam-Leitch & Olawaiye (2008) Pediatrics • Aeder, Fogel & Schaeffer (2010) • Langenau, Fogel & Schaeffer (2009) Radiology Surgery • Shellito et al (2010); Subhas et al (2009); Kosir et al (2008) • Ferguson & Warshaw (2006); Virgilio et al (2003); Bull et al (2001)
A 72 year-old patient presents with progressive difficulty breathing, jugular venous distention, orthopnea, bilateral lower extremity edema , and bilateral rales. Which of the following is most important when deciding upon treatment options?
A. minute respiration B. heart rate C. degree of lower extremity edema D. respiratory rate E. none of the above
A 72 year-old patient presents with progressive difficulty breathing, jugular venous distention, orthopnea, bilateral lower extremity edema , and bilateral rales. Which of the following is most important when deciding upon treatment options?
We don’t treat patients without understanding the etiology of their predicament and the nature of the intervention. Guiding residents’ learning should follow similar guidelines.
XR = XT + ME
XR = Reported ISE Score Scores Percent = items correct = raw score Percentile = resident rank compared to peers
The report of the performance of a PGY2 on his ISE reveals a percent correct of 63 and a percentile rank of 67. What should you do?
A. mandate the resident enter a remediation program B. reduce work hours by 25% to increase study time C. do not promote the resident to the PGY3 year D. encourage the resident to keep studying E. resign as program director
• What is an “average” percent score?
http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf
• What is an “average” percent score? 2009 IM (n = 402 programs) PGY1 = 54% PGY2 = 59% PGY3 = 63%
http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf
• What is an “average” percent score? 2009 IM (n = 402 programs) PGY1 = 54% PGY2 = 59%(example was PGY2 = 63%) PGY3 = 63%
http://www.eric.vcu.edu/home/curriculum/print/2009Histograms.pdf
Your PGY2 from the previous example is now a PGY3. His percentile rank while in your program has been PGY1 = 62, PGY2 = 67, PGY3 = 64. What should you do?
A. realize that this is a common pattern of progression B. worry that this resident will fail his certifying exam C. do not promote the resident to the PGY4 year D. terminate this resident from your program E. delegate the situation to your associate PD
Why is percentile important? Increased risk of failing the certifying exam
%F
The lower the percentile rank –
The greater the risk of failing the certifying examination
30th 50th 100th
Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores
%F
A1
A2
B1
B2
C1
C2
30th 50th 100th
Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores
%F
50th30th
A1
A3B3
C1 B1
C3
C2 B2 A2
100th
Tracking percentiles • Three different residents • Three years of scores
%F
What can you do to assess the residents between the annual ISE’s?
100th50th30th
A1
A3
B1
B3
C1
C3
C2 B2 A2
• Make decisions about • individual’s educational progression • program content areas that are outliers
• Make decisions about • individual’s educational progression • program content areas that are outliers
• Do not make decisions about: • promotion or termination
XR = XT + ME
XT = True Score = two components
XC = Score based on content XB = Score based on beyond content
XR = XC + XB + ME
XR = Reported ISE Score XC = Score based on content XB = Score based on beyond content ME = Measurement Error
• Assigned / Programmed Reading • Conference Attendance
• Didactic lectures • Grand Rounds / M&M
• Practice Questions • Board Review Courses
• Assigned / Programmed Reading • Conference Attendance
• Didactic lectures / Journal Clubs • Grand Rounds / M&M
• Practice Questions • Board Review Courses
• Self-directed Studying • Preparing Lectures for Peers • Reading Fluency and Accuracy • Test Anxiety
• Self-directed Studying • Preparing Lectures for Peers
• Questions from / Clarification by an Attending • Reading Fluency and Accuracy
• Developing theme in repeat failures • Test Anxiety
• Definite impact on memory / recall
• Intervention options • Content = more impact earlier in training
PGY<2 - Programmed Reading / Didactics PGY>3 - Programmed Reading / Didactics
• Beyond Content • Resident Heterogeneity (all years of training)
Studying Skills Test-taking Skills
• Beyond Content • Resident Heterogeneity
Studying Skills • Memory techniques • Reading and Note-taking • Transfer Test-taking Skills • Reading- Fluency and Accuracy • Test Anxiety • Test-Wiseness
4 / 6
1. Assess the resident’s situation Develop an individualized plan It’s not just about XC
2. Create a team Resident and Attending Attending = Coach to Mentor
3. Establish a schedule Regular meetings
4. Monitor and Refine
5 / 6
1. Assess the resident’s situation Develop an individualized plan
There areIt’s not just about XC resources 2. Create a team to help you
Resident and Attending help yourAttending = Coach to Mentor resident
3. Establish a schedule Regular meetings
4. Monitor and Refine
6 / 6
We need to transition away from our focus on teaching (faculty-centered) and instead begin to focus on learning (resident-centered).
Are there some Questions?
Complete Reference List will be posted (pdf)
on SCS website
Emergency Medicine • Hern et al (2009); Cheng (2008); Gillen (1997) Family Medicine • Sevensma SC, Navarre G, Richards RK (2008) Internal Medicine • McDonald, Zeger & Kolars (2008) • Garilbaldi et al (2002) OB/Gyne • Withiam-Leitch & Olawaiye (2008) Pediatrics • Aeder, Fogel & Schaeffer (2010) • Langenau, Fogel & Schaeffer (2009) Radiology Surgery • Shellito et al (2010); Subhas et al (2009); Kosir et al (2008) • Ferguson & Warshaw (2006); Virgilio et al (2003); Bull et al (2001)