Upload
tatum-hawken
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DoD Standardization Conference Lansdowne, Virginia
“Aerospace Qualified Electronic Components”
Joe Chapman
Defense Standardization Program
432-697-9970
March 17, 2004
Why Consider AQEC?
The Perry directive of 1994 and industry response to increased usage of COTS from components to complete systems has resulted in issues:
Component Challenges:
• Radiation susceptibility
• Short design and service life
• Uncontrolled configuration changes
• Narrow temperature ranges
Component Challenges:
• Radiation susceptibility
• Short design and service life
• Uncontrolled configuration changes
• Narrow temperature ranges
System Challenges:
• DMS - Obsolescence
• Continuous upgrades
• System-on-a-Chip
• Open Systems
System Challenges:
• DMS - Obsolescence
• Continuous upgrades
• System-on-a-Chip
• Open Systems
Our Response – The Integrated Aerospace Parts Acquisition Strategy
• Part I (in place): Electronic Component Management Program (ECMP)– Industry documents in place: IEC 62239 and EIA
4899– Avionics suppliers document their processes for
managing electronic components, in accordance with industry documents
– Plans are approved by a third party, e.g., IECQ– Avionics suppliers use approved plans as baseline
RFP processes
Our Response – The Integrated Aerospace Parts Acquisition Strategy
• Part II (in development): Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component (AQEC)
– Streamline implementation of ECMP
– AQEC parts are automatically approved per IEC62239 and EIA 4899
– Use AQEC parts “as-is”
Industry Consensus Definition:
Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component The intent of this definition of an Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component (AQEC) is to (a) ensure that electronic
components used in aerospace applications are reliable in those applications; (b) provide aerospace access to component manufacturers’ commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products at acceptable cost; (c) minimize deviations from the component manufacturers’ COTS products; (d) have little or no negative impact on the AQEC suppliers’ operating or business procedures; and (e) promote communication between the component manufacturer and the aerospace users.
1. The AQEC should have the following features:– Designed, fabricated, assembled, and tested in accordance with the component manufacturers’
requirements for (COTS) products;– Qualified in accordance with the component manufacturer’s standards and specifications for the
manufacturer’s COTS products;– Subject to the component manufacturer’s design, manufacturing, quality assurance, and quality
systems standards, technical specifications, procedures, and other similar requirements for COTS products.
2. In order to be considered an AQEC, the component manufacturer’s COTS component should undergo testing and/or analysis to assess its reliability in the aerospace application. The process to do so should be mutually agreed upon by the AQEC suppliers and users.
3. The configuration of the device should remain stable for a specified period of time. (This may be done in a variety of ways, but one example would be to characterize given lots of devices as AQEC, in sufficient quantities to supply the aerospace market for agreed-upon periods of time.)
The intent of this definition of an Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component (AQEC) is to (a) ensure that electronic components used in aerospace applications are reliable in those applications; (b) provide aerospace access to component manufacturers’ commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products at acceptable cost; (c) minimize deviations from the component manufacturers’ COTS products; (d) have little or no negative impact on the AQEC suppliers’ operating or business procedures; and (e) promote communication between the component manufacturer and the aerospace users.
1. The AQEC should have the following features:– Designed, fabricated, assembled, and tested in accordance with the component manufacturers’
requirements for (COTS) products;– Qualified in accordance with the component manufacturer’s standards and specifications for the
manufacturer’s COTS products;– Subject to the component manufacturer’s design, manufacturing, quality assurance, and quality
systems standards, technical specifications, procedures, and other similar requirements for COTS products.
2. In order to be considered an AQEC, the component manufacturer’s COTS component should undergo testing and/or analysis to assess its reliability in the aerospace application. The process to do so should be mutually agreed upon by the AQEC suppliers and users.
3. The configuration of the device should remain stable for a specified period of time. (This may be done in a variety of ways, but one example would be to characterize given lots of devices as AQEC, in sufficient quantities to supply the aerospace market for agreed-upon periods of time.)
Industry Consensus Definition:
Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component
Intent of Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component (AQEC) definition:(a) Ensure that electronic components used in aerospace applications are reliable in those applications (b) Provide aerospace access to component manufacturers’ commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products at acceptable cost (c) Minimize deviations from the component manufacturers’ COTS products (d) Have little or no negative impact on the AQEC suppliers’ operating or business procedures (e) Promote communication between the component manufacturer and the aerospace users
Intent of Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component (AQEC) definition:(a) Ensure that electronic components used in aerospace applications are reliable in those applications (b) Provide aerospace access to component manufacturers’ commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products at acceptable cost (c) Minimize deviations from the component manufacturers’ COTS products (d) Have little or no negative impact on the AQEC suppliers’ operating or business procedures (e) Promote communication between the component manufacturer and the aerospace users
Industry Consensus Definition (continued):
Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component
1. The AQEC should have the following features:–Designed, fabricated, assembled, and tested in
accordance with the component manufacturers’ requirements for (COTS) products;
–Qualified in accordance with the component manufacturer’s standards and specifications for the manufacturer’s COTS products;
–Subject to the component manufacturer’s design, manufacturing, quality assurance, and quality systems standards, technical specifications, procedures, and other similar requirements for COTS products.
1. The AQEC should have the following features:–Designed, fabricated, assembled, and tested in
accordance with the component manufacturers’ requirements for (COTS) products;
–Qualified in accordance with the component manufacturer’s standards and specifications for the manufacturer’s COTS products;
–Subject to the component manufacturer’s design, manufacturing, quality assurance, and quality systems standards, technical specifications, procedures, and other similar requirements for COTS products.
Industry Consensus Definition (continued):
Aerospace Qualified Electronic Component
2.In order to be considered an AQEC, the component manufacturer’s COTS component should undergo testing and / or analysis to assess its reliability in the aerospace application. The process to do so should be mutually agreed upon by the AQEC suppliers and users.
3.The configuration of the device should remain stable for a specified period of time. (This may be done in a variety of ways, but one example would be to characterize given lots of devices as AQEC, in sufficient quantities to supply the aerospace market for agreed-upon periods of time.)
2.In order to be considered an AQEC, the component manufacturer’s COTS component should undergo testing and / or analysis to assess its reliability in the aerospace application. The process to do so should be mutually agreed upon by the AQEC suppliers and users.
3.The configuration of the device should remain stable for a specified period of time. (This may be done in a variety of ways, but one example would be to characterize given lots of devices as AQEC, in sufficient quantities to supply the aerospace market for agreed-upon periods of time.)
AQEC Benefits
• Promotes communication between semiconductor device and aerospace industry
• Minimizes & reduces need for uprating or upscreening
• Part performance characterized for avionics
• Component Roadmap / Transition Plan – DMSMS
• Minimize / Reduce LTB and ‘tactical’ reaction….
• Assures configuration control – “Better Manage DMSMS”
• Assures part availability – “Better Manage DMSMS”
• Enables system design tradeoffs (performance, lifetime, supply voltage, speed, temperature, etc.)
• Enables ‘higher-level’ system options, e.g., system-on-a-chip, throw-away cards
We don’t have to re-create the mil-spec system
The AQEC Process Flow
Semiconductor device mfr
Aerospace user
Inventory manager
Joint activityAssessment body
Characterize AQEC parts
Define “essential aerospace
care-abouts”
Forecast part volumes
AQEC definition
Part/family specifications
Approve processes
Purchase & inventory
AQEC parts
Use AQEC parts
Document AQEC characterization
processes
Parsimonious list of
parts/families
Feedback
Why does this have potential for success?O Many such components already exist and are in aerospace
applications
O Texas Instruments & National Semiconductor introduced specific product families targeted for such applications –
“Enhanced Plastic”
O IC manufacturers realize it takes all stakeholders to meet the challenge ahead & legalism alone will not spare anyone
O Modern ICs have incredible capability yet many risks remain – especially if inappropriately used
O It “is” about money and profits and motivation exists……
O Collaboration across the related industries has been excellent!
The Question remains-Do we have the will to succeed?
Recent progress:
O Avionics Process Management Committee (APMC): with semiconductor industry developed an AQEC “Definition”
O G-12 and JEDEC committees met with APMC in Phoenix in January and have established a working group to define next steps
O Semiconductor companies (2-3) joining APMC
O NAVAIR – PAX River has supported AQEC effort for past 1 ½ yrs
O “Socialization” of this effort continues….ADUSD (LPP) briefed in December 03 and received support
O JACG briefed in January 04 and further support granted
O FAA and NASA participating in meetings and seeking ways toutilize AQEC components where appropriate
O AIA Product Support and Engineering Management Committee briefed and received support
Who’s InvolvedDoD:
NAVAIR, DSPO, AWACS, AMCOM, JCAA, DUSD(L&MR)
DoD:
NAVAIR, DSPO, AWACS, AMCOM, JCAA, DUSD(L&MR)
Airframe Integrators:
Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman
Airframe Integrators:
Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman
Avionics OEMs:
Honeywell, BAE, Smiths, Rockwell Collins, Goodrich
Avionics OEMs:
Honeywell, BAE, Smiths, Rockwell Collins, Goodrich
Part Manufacturers:
Motorola, AMI, Micron, Texas Instruments, IBM, Intel, Xilinx, National, LSI Logic, Vishay-Siliconix, Linear Technology, Altera, Philips, Analog Devices
Part Manufacturers:
Motorola, AMI, Micron, Texas Instruments, IBM, Intel, Xilinx, National, LSI Logic, Vishay-Siliconix, Linear Technology, Altera, Philips, Analog Devices
Others:
NASA, FAA, COG, G-12, EIA, SIA, JEDEC, AIA, AVSI, DSCC
Others:
NASA, FAA, COG, G-12, EIA, SIA, JEDEC, AIA, AVSI, DSCC
What do we need to do next?O Continue the ‘socialization’ efforts –– industry / government
O Activate the AQEC working group and begin work
O Customers (DoD – FAA – NASA – airframe integrators): Issue Customers (DoD – FAA – NASA – airframe integrators): Issue “mandate” to use AQEC in critical applications, e.g., “mandate” to use AQEC in critical applications, e.g.,
contract flow-down-contract flow-down-------------”REQUIRED BY Air ------------”REQUIRED BY Air Framers/NASA/FAA?”Framers/NASA/FAA?”
O O System designers: Use AQEC where required – no exceptionsSystem designers: Use AQEC where required – no exceptions
O Semiconductor device manufacturers: Develop and apply O Semiconductor device manufacturers: Develop and apply AQEC processesAQEC processes
O If necessary, change the rules---O If necessary, change the rules---Socialization / Collaboration & Socialization / Collaboration & might require legislationmight require legislation
Utilize DoD Standardization Program Office where appropriate!Utilize DoD Standardization Program Office where appropriate!
Points of Contact for AQEC information:
Joe Chapman Lloyd Condra
[email protected] [email protected]
432-697-9970 206-655-8240