14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY) Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors: N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail W illiam Carney SO N Y San D iego, CA +1-858-774-9865 [email protected] YuichiMorioka SO N Y Basingstoke, UK +44-12-5682-8114 [email protected] K azuyukiSakoda SO N Y Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-2701 [email protected] M asahito M ori SO N Y Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-7131 [email protected] TakeshiItagaki SO N Y Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-2701 [email protected] Brian H art Cisco System s [email protected] Tom o A dachi Toshiba [email protected] Sean Coffey Realtek [email protected] Guido Hiertz Ericsson A B [email protected]

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

July 2014

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1

DSC and Legacy Coexistence

Date: 14/07/2014

Name Affiliations Address Phone email William Carney SONY San Diego, CA +1-858-774-9865 [email protected]

Yuichi Morioka SONY Basingstoke, UK +44-12-5682-8114 [email protected]

Kazuyuki Sakoda SONY Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-2701 [email protected]

Masahito Mori SONY Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-7131 [email protected]

Takeshi Itagaki SONY Tokyo, JP +81-050-3750-2701 [email protected]

Brian Hart Cisco Systems [email protected]

Tomo Adachi Toshiba [email protected]

Sean Coffey Realtek [email protected]

Guido Hiertz Ericsson AB [email protected]

Authors:

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Abstract

• Dynamic Sensitivity Control (DSC) techniques as discussed to date in TGax have shown promise to improve TGax STA performance.

• However, TGax STA improvements using DSC should not adversely affect performance of legacy STAs.

• Effects of DSC in mixed networks therefore needs careful study and proper mitigation methods should be considered.

July 2014

Slide 2 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Introduction

• DSPG’s presentation (11-14-0779-00-00ax-dsc-practical-usage) says,– Legacy STA in the same network as a DSC STA is completely

unaffected by the DSC STAs.– The legacy STA may be held off from transmitting by STA in OBSS,

but will compete equally with DSC STAs in same BSS• As other DSC STAs will ignore OBSS STAs their traffic is often occurring

during a time when the legacy STA cannot TX, and hence overall contention is lessened.

• This effect cannot be ignored in the evaluation of 11ax.

July 2014

Slide 3 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

DSPG’s Simulation Results

July 2014

Slide 4

DSC Network with • 2 DSC STAs• 2 Legacy STAsOBSS Network• 4 Legacy STAs

DSC 100MbpsLegacy ~22Mbps

Legacy ~22Mbps

Legacy STAs are not affectedBUT look at the DSC STAs!

Quoted from:11-14-0779-00-00ax-dsc-practical-usage

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Conditions• Each STA sends uplink UDP traffic (Full-buffer condition).• See backup slide for more detail.

July 2014

Slide 5

50m3m3m

AP1 AP2

Case 1 (2 STAs per BSS)

Case 2 (24 STAs per BSS)

DSC STA or Legacy STA

DSC STA or Legacy STA

Legacy STA

Legacy STA

50m3m3m

AP1 AP2

Each STA is close enough to their AP so that each link satisfies the required SNR for used MCS, even if interference from OBSS is observed.

Packets from OBSS can be detected by only Legacy STAs. (See next slide)

Packets from OBSS can be detected by only Legacy STAs.

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Conditions(Relation between preamble detection threshold and distance from OBSS)

July 2014

Slide 6

Receive level when Tx power is +15dBm

DSC STA cannot detect packets from OBSS

Legacy STA can detect packets from OBSS

Preamble detectionthreshold for DSC STAset to -62 dBm

Preamble detectionthreshold for Legacy STAset to -82 dBm

(Note) Propagation loss model of TGn is used.Fluctuation by fading isnot illustrated.

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Results (Case 1: 4 STAs)

July 2014

Slide 7

50m 3m3m

AP1 AP2

If the number of STAs is few,there is less difference of

Legacy STAs’ performance.

But...

STA4

STA1 STA2

STA3

DSC Legacy

STA1 (DSC STA or Legacy STA)

STA2 (DSC STA or Legacy STA)

STA3 (Legacy STA)

STA4 (Legacy STA)

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 8: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Results (Case 2: 48 STAs)

July 2014

Slide 8

As the number of STAs increases,

there is noticeable performance degradation of Legacy STAs.

DSC Legacy It is not negligible, especially in a dense scenario.

50m 3m3m

AP1 AP2

STA1~12 (DSC STA or Legacy STA)

STA13~24 (DSC STA or Legacy STA)

STA25~36 (Legacy STA)

STA37~48 (Legacy STA)

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 9: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Results (Throughput Summary)

July 2014

Slide 9

Throughput [Mbps]

All STAs are Legacy

STA1 and 2 use DSC

System Total25.32

35.60

DSC Total(per STA) -

25.25(12.62)

Legacy Total(per STA)

25.32 (6.33)

10.35(5.18)

Throughput [Mbps]

All STAs are Legacy

Half of STAs use DSC

System Total26.91

38.36

DSC Total(per STA) -

32.86(1.37)

Legacy Total(per STA)

26.91(0.56)

5.50(0.23)

Case 1 (2 STAs per BSS) Case 2 (24 STAs per BSS)

40% Up 42% Up

18% Down 59% Down

Throughput degradation for Legacy STA depends on the number of STAs.

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 10: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Summary

• The impact of using DSC in TGax on other Legacy STA exists and is not negligible.

• As the number of STAs increases (e.g., dense scenarios), the degradation on performance of Legacy STAs also increases.

• Suggest to evaluate impact on fairness with legacy STAs when conducting DSC simulations.

July 2014

Slide 10 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 11: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

BACKUP

July 2014

Slide 11 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 12: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Simulation Conditions

July 2014

Slide 12

Node & Topology See right figures

Traffic Model & Load Uplink UDP 100Mbps (from all STA)

Traffic Duration [sec] 20

Access Category AC_BE (CWmin=15, CWmax=1023, AIFSN=3)

Tx Power [dBm] +15dBm

MCS MCS5 (52Mbps) Fixed

Packet Length [byte] (MPDU, MSDU, APP)=(1530, 1500, 1472) Fixed

L2 Retry 10

Ack Rate MCS0 Fixed

RTS/CTS Disabled

Aggregation Disabled

Channel (Propagation, Shadow, Fading)=(TGn, Disabled, Flat Rayleigh)

Preamble DetectionThreshold. [dBm]

-62 (on DSC STA, AP), -82 (on Legacy STA)

Energy DetectionThreshold [dBm]

-62

Channel Setting [MHz] (Center Freq, BW)=(2412, 20)

Detection Cancel behavior onPLCP error

Not emulated

50m 3m3m

AP1 AP2

Case 1

Case 2

50m 3m3m

AP1 AP2

DSC STA or Legacy STA

DSC STA or Legacy STA

Legacy STA

Legacy STA

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 13: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Confirmation of simulation conditions

• What is the behavior of each STA when PLCP header has an error ?– Is Rx canceled or does it continue to receive?

• Does AP also enable DSC ?

July 2014

Slide 13 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)

Page 14: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/854r0

Submission

Behavior of DSC and Rx cancel on PLCP error

July 2014

Slide 14

Preamble DataSTA

AP

Detect depend on preamble level

SIG

When CRC of SIG is error,Then Rx is cancelled.

“Busy” or “Idle” depends on Energy-Detection resultRx

Preamble DataSTA

AP

SIG

Not detect due to high threshold

DSC

Rx cancel on PLCP error

W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)