Upload
lekhanh
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page1
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
DOWTI OIL PRICEMOVEMENTSFOLLOWAMARKOVCHAIN?
ByRichardR.ConnCMA,MBA,CPA,ABV,ERP
Thispaperisthefirstinatwo‐partserieswhichis,ultimately,dedicatedtooutliningamethodologyforpredictingfutureoilpricesusingMarkovproperties.Farfrombeinguniqueorinnovative,therehavebeenmanyexcellentacademicworksonthissubjectalreadywritten(seeReferences).However,thedifficultywithacademicpapersisthattheyaretypicallywrittenfortheacademiccommunityandnottheaveragepractitioner.Thispaperissquarelyaimedatprovidingthetypicalfinancialanalyst(whoalreadyhasarudimentaryunderstandingofmatrixalgebraandthebasicqualitiesofMarkovprobabilities)withanoverviewofcreatingaWTI(WestTexasIntermediate)MonteCarlo‐styledoilpricepredictionmodel.
Theprimarydifferencebetweentheapproachtakenherecomparedwiththeacademicpapersisthatthefocusofthisserieswillbeuponforecastingthefuturestatesoftheoutcomes(i.e.directionallythestepsinvolvedingettingfromthecurrentWTIleveltosomefuturepredictionofWTI)comparedwithestimatingthefuturepricelevelofWTI.Mostoftheacademicpapersareintentuponestimatingwhetherfutureoilpricewillbehigherorlowerthancurrentpricesand,ifso,buthowmuch.We,instead,willbeinterestedinpredictingtherandomwalkthatWTIislikelytotakebetweennowandthelong‐termforeseeablefutureratherthanuponattemptingtoestimatethesizeofeachofthosesteps(i.e.themagnitudeofthepricechangeateachpointintime).Onlyafterwehavedevisedapaththatfutureoilpricemovementsarelikelytofollowwillweturnourattentiontothequestionofestimatinghowlargeeachofthosepricechangesreasonablycanbeexpectedtobe.Thepracticalityofthisapproachwillbecomeevidentasthemethodologyisunveiled.
ANOVERVIEWOFTHEMECHANICS
Whiletheexplanationwillbetedious,thedetailsofwhattheMarkovpropertiesareandwhytheyareimportanttothemovementsofoilpricesisunavoidable.Atthesametime,aslittlespaceaspossiblewillbededicatedtowardstheunderlyingtheory–thisseriesisdedicatedtowardscomingupwithapracticalandworkingmodel.
MarkovChainsareprobabilisticmodels/observationsaboutmovementswithinastatespace.Consideringthemovementofoilprices(andweshallonlyconcernourselveswiththemovementofWTI)thereareonlythreestates.Attheendofanygivenday,forexample,theWTIpricecouldhavemovedup,moveddownorstayedthesame,relativetotheclosingpriceofthepreviousday.Thislatterstatewouldbedescribedasa‘loop’–thepriceloopedbacktowhereitwassuchthatthenew‘state’isthesameastheold.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page2
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
Suchanobservationshouldleadtheanalyticallycurioustothequestion:‘WithwhatfrequencyhaveWTIpricesincreasedinthepastrelativetohowoftentheyhavedeclinedorremainedthesame?’BeingabletoanswerthisquestionmayleadtobeingabletomakebetterpredictionsaboutthefuturepathofWTIprices.IfweabbreviatesuchmovementsasD,S,UforDown,Same,Uprespectively,thenwehaveashorthandmeansofquicklysymbolizinglongstringsorchainsofpricemovements.If,forexample,wearedescribingasequenceofpricechangesoversixdays(i.e.fivemovements)asDDSUD,then,thatmeanstheSeconddayendingpricewasDownfromthefirst;theThirdwasDownfromthesecond;theFourthwastheSameastheThird;theFifthwasUpfromtheFourth;andfinallytheSixwasDownfromtheFifth.
TheprimarycharacteristicofMarkovianmovementsbetweenthevariousstatesisthatonlythecurrentpositionwithinthestatespaceisinanywayrelevanttothenextmovement.Intheexampleabove,ifweareattemptingtopredictwhereWTIwillbeattheendofDaySeven(eitherD,S,orUrelativetoDaySix),theonlyinformationthatisusefulinmakingthatpredictionisthatDaySixendedasa“D”day.ThefactthatthepreviousfourmovementspriortoDaySixwereDDSUinnowayimprovesourstatisticalchancesofcorrectlyestimatinghowDaySevenwillend.AnotherwaytosaythisisthatXXXXDD(whereDaySevenendsasa‘Down’Day,forexample)hasjustasmuchprobabilityofoccurringasDDSUDDorUUUUDDorUSDSDDoranypermutationwhereXXXXrepresentsanyrandomstringof“D”,”S”,”U”(andthemathematicallyastutewillrecognizethatthereare3^4=81permutationspossiblehere).InotherwordsthehistoryorpaththatWTIpricestookbeforearrivingattheDofDaySixhasnobearinguponthedirectionthatpriceswilltakeonDaySeven.AnotherwayofsayingthisisthatthepricemovementonDaySeveniscompletelyindependentofthedirectionofthepricemovementsatanytimepriortoDaySix.
WhyshouldwecareifWTIpricesexhibitMarkoviancharacteristics?Because,ifWTIpricesareindependentofthepathupontheytooktogettothecurrentstateANDwecanidentifyordetermineaprobabilityforwhichstatetheymightnextmoveto,thenthiswillquiteeasilyallowustobuildasimpleprobabilisticmodelforpredictingwhereWTIpricesmaybegoing.Conversely,if
CurrentWTIPrice
FIGURE1
NewHigherPrice(U)
NewLowerPrice(D)
PriceStaysSame(S)
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page3
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
WTIpricesarepathdependent,thenthelevelofcomplexityinvolvedincalculatingwheretheycannextbeexpectedtomovetoincreasesexponentially.Imagine,forexample,thatitisnowDaySixwhichhasendedasaDDayandtheprobabilityofwherepricemayendtomorrowisdependentuponthepathpricestookinthepreviousfivedays(i.e.thefourpricemovementspriortothe“D”ofDaySix).Thatwouldmeanthateachofthepossible81differentpricepathsthatmayhaveoccurredinthelastfivedayscouldhaveitsownuniqueprobabilityindeterminingwherepricemovestoonDaySeven.Andnowimaginehowcomplexitmaybetopredictpricemovementsiftomorrow’spricewereinsomewaydependentuponwhichpricepathhadbeentakenovertheprior50or100or1,000tradingdays?Thatwouldbe3^49or3^99or3^999possiblepermutationsrespectively–numberstoolargetocomprehend,muchlessassignprobabilitiesto.
SowewantWTIpricemovementstopossessMarkoviancharacteristics,butwecannotsimplyassumethattheydo.SomeformaltestprocedureneedstobeappliedtoempiricalWTIhistoricdatainordertoassessifthosemovementshavefollowedaMarkovchain(i.e.arepathindependent)
ANINTUITIVEAPPROACH
EvenbeforeconsideringamorerigorousapproachthatinvolvestheuseofmatrixalgebraandtheChi‐squaretest,thereisanintuitiveapproachthatshouldallowustosetalower‐boundaryabouttheprice‐pathdependencyofhistoricWTIpricemovements.WhilethisinformalmethodwillnotallowustoabsolutelyconcludethatWTIpricemovementsdofollowaMarkovchain,itwillalertusintheeventthattheyclearlydonot.
IfWTIpricemovementsareMarkovianandprice‐pathindependent,thenitisonlythecurrentstatethathasanybearinguponwherepricewillmovenext.Thismeansthat,selectingasub‐sampleof,sayDD,pricemovementsfromaverylargesampleofWTIpricehistorywewouldexpecttofindthesamerelativefrequencyofDDpricechainsastheoccurrenceofXDDpricechains.Thatis,giventhattheprobabilityforpricestodeclinetwiceinsuccession(whichnecessarilywouldrequirea3dayobservationperiod),wewouldexpecttofindthesameprobabilityforanXDDpricechaintooccuroverafourdayobservationperiod(wherethe“X”couldrepresenteitheraUp,DownorSamemovement).Ifthiswerenotthecase,thenonemightbegintosuspectthatprice‐pathhadsomebearinguponwhatcoursethethirdpricemovementtook.
Expandingthislogic,ifposthocWTIpricemovementsareprice‐pathindependent,wewouldexpectXXDDtooccurwiththesamerelativefrequenciesasDDchains.And,similarly,XXXXXXXDDtendayobservationsshouldoccurwiththesamefrequencyandsoshouldone‐hundred‐daychainsendinginDDoccurinjustthesamefrequency.1
1Thecaveathereisthatwearespeakingaboutrelativefrequency.If,forexample,oursubsampleis1,001dayslong,thereare1,000chainsoflengthtwopossible.Thisisbecause,onthefirstday,thereisnomovement,soittakestwodaysuponwhichtoobservethefirstmovement.Sequentially,then1,000two‐periodchainscouldbeobservedovera1,001daysubsample.Ifnisthenumberofdaysinthesubsample,andkisthelengthofthechain,then,n‐(k‐1)=numberofchainspossible.Therefore,1,001–(2–1)=1,000.Similarly,ifwewanttoobservethefrequencyoflengththreechains,nowtherewouldonlybe1,001–(3–1)=999chainspossible.InthatcasewemaybemeasuringtheratioofXDDchainsthatoccurover999possible
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page4
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
EIAEMPIRICALEVIDENCE:TheU.S.EnergyInformationAdministration(EIA)maintainsalargedatabaseofhistoricalWTIprices(spotprices,measuredatCushing,OK)andmakesthatavailableforeasydownloadineither,daily,weeklyormonth‐endform.ThatdatabasebeginsonJan.2,1986andthereforeincludesapproximately7,100tradingdayobservationsuptopresentday(thispaperwaswritteninearlyMay,2014).Bydrawingourconclusionsfroma28yearsample,weareimplicitlyconditioningourresultstobelong‐termedinnature.Anysingle‐eventWTIpriceshockthathasoccurredsinceJanuary1986will,tosomeextent,bereflectedinthedata–buttemperedbythelong‐termstatusquo.Similarly,anyshortormid‐termcyclesthattheWTIhasexhibitedwillbesomewhatmitigatedinourresults.Hadwewantedtoconstructamid‐termestimatorofWTIprices,wewouldhavebeenfacedwiththedifficultyofdecidingwhichportionofthehistoricdatabestreflectedtheexpectedcharacteristicsoftheforthcomingmid‐term.Wewill,however,examinethedataforshortandlong‐termvolatility,withtheintentofidentifyinganypermanenttransitionsthatmayhaveoccurredovertime.Butwewillnotdosountilafterourobservationsaboutfrequencyhasbeenpresented.
outcomes.Similarly,achainoflength100(i.e.wouldrequire101observationdays)couldonlypossiblyoccur1,001–(100–1)=902inthissubsampleandthereforeitwouldbefrequencyofthenumberlength100chainsendinginDDrelativetothe902possibleoutcomesofachainthislengththatwouldprovidetheimportantstatisticinthiscase.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page5
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
TABLE1:FREQUENCYOF‘XX’ENDINGCHAINSINEIADATA
Two Day Chains:
Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n + 1) Observation
D 22.11% 0.71% 24.63%
S 0.83% 0.07% 0.84%
U 24.50% 0.95% 25.37%
Ten Day Chains:
Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n + 1) Observation
D 22.10% 0.71% 24.63%
S 0.83% 0.07% 0.84%
U 24.50% 0.95% 25.37%
One-Hundred Day Chains:
Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n + 1) Observation
D 22.03% 0.71% 24.67%
S 0.82% 0.07% 0.84%
U 24.54% 0.95% 25.37%
One-Thousand Day Chains:
Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n + 1) Observation
D 22.49% 0.60% 24.67%
S 0.65% 0.08% 0.72%
U 24.61% 0.76% 25.42%
Lookingfirstatthe2DayChaindata,attheintersectionofDD,thistellsusgivenallthepossible2daychainsthatcouldhavebeenobservedintheEIAdata(therewere7,143)22.11%ofthetimeaDownmovementonDaynwasfollowedbyasubsequentDownmovement(i.e.DD)onDayn+1.Similarly,25.37%ofthetimeanUpmovementwasfollowed,onthenextday,byanotherUpmovement(i.e.UU).Movingtothedatarepresentingthe1,000daychainswefindthat,ofallthepossible1,000daychainsthatcouldhavebeenobservedinthatdata(ofwhichtherewere7,144–(1000–1)=6,145uniqueobservations),weseeverysimilarstatisticsasthein2Dayobservations.Thereisroughlya22.5%chanceofobservinga1,000daychainthatendsinDD.Thereisonlyasixth‐tenthsofone‐percentchanceofobservinga1,000daychainthatendsinSD.And,thereisapproximatelya25.4%chanceofa1,000daychainendinginUU.Theseareverysimilarnumberstotheobservationsinthe2daychainswhichare,inturn,veryclosetothosestatisticsobservedwiththe10daychains
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page6
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
andthe100daychains.Hadweobservedadramaticallychangingstatisticasthechainsgotlonger,wemighthavebeguntosuspectthattheWTImovesinaprice‐pathdependentmanner.Butthedailyoutcomes2haveremainedremarkablyconsistentregardlessofthelengthofthechain,thereforeitisappropriatetodosomemoreformaltesting.
MARKOVPROBABILITIESINMATRIXFORM
ItisconvenienttopresentMarkovsingle‐stagedatainMatrixform.Foreaseofexposition,wewillspeakofthedailypricemovementswhenexplainingthemethodology,butlatertheweeklyobservationswillalsobepresentedandcomparedtothedaily.Therearetwopresentationalternativespossible(oneisthetranspositionoftheother)andafewwordsonMatrixprotocolareprobablyinorder.
FIGURE2
Day n Observations
Down Same Up
Day (n +1) Observations
Down DD SD UD
Same DS SS US
Up DU SU UU
100% 100% 100%
Day (n + 1) Observations Down Same Up
Day n Observations
Down DD DS DU 100% Same SD SS SU 100%
Up UD US UU 100% Thedifferencebetweenthetwopresentationsabovedealswithwhetherweareidentifyingthe‘Dayn’observationsasrowsandthe‘Dayn+1’observationsascolumns,ortheotherwayaround.Theconventionusuallyistheformer,‘Dayn’arerows,‘Dayn+1’arecolumnsand,asaresult,thetotalofeachrowsumsto100%.Thedifferencebetweenthetwoisamatterofpersonalpreference,butitisimportanttokeepinmindthatthestatisticweareinterestedinisthatgiventhatweareatcurrentstateXasat‘Dayn’,wewishtoknowtheprobabilityofmovingtostateXon‘Dayn+1’.Forexample,giventhatwehaveobserveda‘DState’on‘Dayn’weareinterestedinlearningthe
2ForreasonsofspacetheweeklystatisticswillnotbepresentedherebyreservedforAppendix1.Similartothedailystats,thereisagooddealofconsistencymovingbetweenthelengthsofchains.OnenotabledistinctionbetweentheDailyandWeeklyobservationswasthatitwasnoticeablymorelikelyforatwo‐weekchaintofinishonaUU(about30%ofthetime),thanitwasforatwo‐daychaintodoso(onlyabout25%ofthetime).
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page7
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
frequencywithwhichthistransitionstoa‘DU’chain,forexample,onDayn+1.Therefore,thesumofallthe‘DX’chainsinthatsubsampletotal100%(which,bydefinition,theymust).Itwouldbeamistaketoobtaintheteststatisticinthewrongorder.Forexample,todeterminethefrequencyof‘XD’.Inwordsthiswouldbeakintoaskingourselves,giventhefactthat‘Dayn’hasendedinthe‘DState’whatistheprobabilityofobservingthe‘XState’on‘Dayn–1’?SuchanobservationwouldnotbeinaccordancewithMarkoviancharacteristics.Forreasonsofpersonalpreference,thispaperwillusetheunconventionalDaynObservationsascolumns(ergo,theColumnswillsumto100%),andapologizesareofferedtothosereadersmoreaccustomedtothemorefrequentformwheretherowssumto100%.
MARKOVPROBABILITIESOBSERVEDINWTIPRICEMOVEMENTSSINCE1986
ThefollowingtableshowstheprobabilityofobservinganXpricemovementonDayn+1giventheoccurrenceofanXmovementontheprecedingday:
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page8
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
TABLE2:MARKOVPROBABILITIESINWTI
2 Day Chain3 Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.61% 41.13% 48.44% S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% U 51.65% 54.84% 49.90%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
10 Day Chain Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.60% 41.13% 48.44% S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% U 51.66% 54.84% 49.90%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100 Day Chain Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.48% 40.98% 48.49% S 1.74% 4.10% 1.65% U 51.78% 54.92% 49.86%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
1000 Day Chain Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 47.10% 41.57% 48.56% S 1.36% 5.62% 1.41% U 51.53% 52.81% 50.03%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
3Somelicenceistakenwiththenamingconventionhere.Recognizethatanobservationoftwoperiods(e.g.SU)requiresthreeseparatedaysbecauseitcanonlybeknownwhatthe‘n’daymovementisattheendofthesecondday.Similarly,then+1dayobservationcanonlybecompletedatendofdaythree.Therefore,whenwespeakofaTwoDayChain,wereallymeanthreedayshaveelapsed.Further,forthe10‐DayChain,Day‘n’istheobservationtakenonDay10(the9thpricemovement)andDay(n+1)istheobservationtakenonDay11.Usingposthocdatalookingbackwards,wearealwaysinterestedintheXXmovementsattheendofthechain.ThiswillnotbethecasewhenweuseMarkovprobabilitiestopredictfuturepricemovements.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page9
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
Similartoourobservationsregardingthesimplefrequenciestable,wenotethattheMarkovprobabilitiesalsodisplayasurprisingconsistencyregardlessofhowlongthepricemovementchainis.Itisnotasintuitivelyobvious,inthiscasewhetherthisconsistencyisagoodthingornot.However,thestatisticalinterpretationofoutcomesissimilar.Lookingatthe2DayChaindata,forexample,ofalltheoccasionswhereanoccurrenceofDXwasobserved,46.60%ofthosetimesresultedinaDDobservation,1.74%ofthetimeaDSwasobservedand51.65%ofthetimesaDUeventhadoccurred.BeforeproceedingonwithamoreindepthdescriptionofMarkovprobabilitiesandhowtheymightbetested,itwillbeusefultodigresstoacomparisonoftheDailyvs.WeeklyMarkovMatricesasthisinformationwillbecomerelevantlaterinthediscussion.ThefollowingissimplyarepeatofTable2asabove,exceptnowtheweek‐endclosingpricedatahasbeenjuxtaposed(ontheright)alongsidethedailydata:
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page10
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
TABLE3:DAILYVSWEEKLYMARKOVPROBABILITIES
Daily WTI Price Chain Data Weekly (i.e. week-ending) WTI Price Chain Data 2 Day Chain 2 Week Chain
Day n Observation Weekly n Observation
D S U D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.61% 41.13% 48.44% Weekly (n +1) Observations
D 51.66% 50.00% 42.51%
S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% S 0.58% 0.00% 0.26%
U 51.65% 54.84% 49.90% U 47.76% 50.00% 57.23%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
10 Day Chain 10 Week Chain Day n Observation Weekly n Observation
D S U D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.60% 41.13% 48.44% Weekly (n +1) Observations
D 51.17% 50.00% 42.44%
S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% S 0.59% 0.00% 0.26%
U 51.66% 54.84% 49.90% U 48.25% 50.00% 57.31%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100 Day Chain 100 Week Chain Day n Observation Weekly n Observation
D S U D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.48% 40.98% 48.49% Weekly (n +1) Observations
D 51.55% 50.00% 42.47%
S 1.74% 4.10% 1.65% S 0.62% 0.00% 0.27%
U 51.78% 54.92% 49.86% U 47.83% 50.00% 57.26%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
1000 Day Chain 1000 Week Chain Day n Observation Weekly n Observation
D S U D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 47.10% 41.57% 48.56% Weekly (n +1) Observations
D 51.14% 0.00% 41.54%
S 1.36% 5.62% 1.41% S 0.46% 0.00% 0.00%
U 51.53% 52.81% 50.03% U 48.40% 100.00% 58.46%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Salientobservationsincomparingthedailyvs.weeklyprobabilitiesare:
1. GiventhataparticularweekhasendedinaUstate,itisabout8%morelikelythatitwillbefollowedbyanotherUweek‐endthanisitthecasethataUUoccurrencewouldbeobservedinthedailydata.
2. Thecorollaryisthat,giventhataweekhasendedinaDstate,itismarginallylesslikelythatitwillbefollowedbyaU(DU’sonlyoccurapproximately48%ofthetimeintheweekly
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page11
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
data)thanwouldbethecaseinthedaily(whereDU’soccurapproximately52%ofthetime).
TheotherreadilyapparentobservationwecanmakeabouttheWeeklyData,isthatthismuchlessstabilityintheoccurrenceoftheSXchains.Thisstandstoreasonbecausethenumberofoccasionsuponwhichthefirstweekwillendatexactlythesamepriceasthestartingobservationwillbequiterare.
THEMARKOVTRANSITIONMATRIX
Ifweacceptthatonlythecurrentstateisanindicatorofwherethenextstateislikelytobe(and,therefore,allthepreviouspricemovementspriortothecurrentstatehavenobearinginthematter),thenthereisasinglematrixthatwillencapsulateallthatcanbeknownaboutprobablepricemovements.ThisiscalledtheTransitionMatrixand,inthecaseofthedailyWTIpricedataisrepresentedby:
TABLE4:MARKOVTRANSITIONMATRIX
2 Day Chain Day n Observation
D S U
Day (n +1) Observations
D 46.61% 41.13% 48.44% S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% U 51.65% 54.84% 49.90%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Thistellsusthat,giventhatwehavealreadyobservedaDmovementtoday(onDayn),thereisa46.61%probabilityofanotherDmovementhappeningtomorrow(onDay(n+1)).Butdoesitgiveusanypredictiveinsightintowhatislikelytohappenthedayaftertomorrow(onDay(n+2))?Forexample,giventhattodayaDmovementhasalreadyoccurred,whatistheprobabilitythatanotherDmovementwilloccurtomorrowfollowedbyanotherDmovementthedayafterthat?Well,todayweknowthereisa46.61%probabilitythatasubsequentDwilloccuronDay(n+1)andthentomorrow,giventhataDmovementhadalreadyhappenedonthatday,theprobabilityofanotherD(onDay(n+2))is46.61%again.So,theprobabilityofaDDDis46.61%^2=21.7249%ButwhatifwewereattemptingtopredictthemorerelevantinstancewhereweknowtodayhasendedwithaDmovement(forexample),butwewishtopredictifDay(n+2)wouldendwithaDmovement?Symbolically,thiscanberepresentedbythechainDXD.TheprobabilityofobservingaDonDay(n+2)giventhataDhasoccurredonDaynmustbethesumoftheprobabilities:DDD+DSD+DUD.ThesearetheonlythreepathsbeginningwiththecurrentstateofDthatwillallowustofinishwithaDonDay(n+2).Usingthe2DayprobabilitiesfromtheTransitionMatrix,wecancalculatethisprobabilityas:
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page12
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
DDD=(DD)x(DD) =46.61%x46.61% =21.7249% DSD= (DS)x(SD) =1.74%x41.13% =0.7157% DUD=(DU)x(UD) =51.65%x48.44% =25.0193% PROBABILITYOFDXD =47.46%4Markovchainshavethissomewhatcounter‐intuitiveandironicquality:pastmovementshavenopredictivepower–knowingthepricepathuponwhichtoday’sstatecameintobeingisofnopracticalassistanceinestimatingwhattomorrow’spricemovementwillbe–onlytoday’sstatehasanybearingupontomorrow.Andyet,whenestimatingfurtherforward,saytothedayaftertomorrow,thenthepricepathdoesbecomerelevant.Thisisbecausetomorrow’sstateisdependentuponwhatstateweareattodayandsotoowillbethestateonDay(n+2)becauseweareattemptingtopredictitpriortoknowingwithabsolutecertaintyhowtomorrowwillend.Thisisthe‘chain‐like’featureofMarkovchains.WhilewecouldcontinuetocalculateallthepossiblepathsremainingaswedidaboveforDXD,namely:DXS,DXU,SXD,SXS,SXU,UXD,UXSandUXU,itwillbeeasieratthispointjusttonotethat,becauseofthemarvelsofmatrixalgebra,alltheseoutcomeswillbeprovidedsimplybyraisingtheTransitionMatrixtothepoweroftwo:FIGURE3:TRANSITIONMATRIXRAISEDTO2NDPOWER
Matrix A Matrix A2 D S U D S U
D 46.61% 41.13% 48.44% ^2 47.46% 47.39% 47.43%S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65% = 1.73% 1.78% 1.73%U 51.65% 54.84% 49.90% 50.81% 50.82% 50.83%Therefore,if,onDaynweareinStateS,andweareattemptingtoestimatewhattheprobabilityisthatDay(n+2)willendalsoinStateS,MatrixA2tellsusthereisa1.78%chanceofthatoccurring.And,itshouldbereadilyapparentthatestimatingtheoutcomeonDay(n+3)isrepresentedinMatrixA3andthattheprobableoutcomesonDay(n+100)arecapturedinMatrixA100,etc.Therefore,ifwewishtoknowwhattheprobabilityisthatWTIwillcloseeitherinanD,SorUstate1,000dayshence,weonlyneedaninexpensivematrixcalculatortokeyinMatrixAasaboveandraisethistothepowerof1,000.Couldanyapproachbesimpler?Inthiscase,theanswerisYES,because,aswewillnextdiscuss,theprocessveryquicklyapproachesasteadystate.
STEADYSTATELIMITVALUEOFTRANSITIONMATRIX
Ignoringallthereasoningastowhythisistrue5,itturnsoutthat,iftheTransitionMatrixis‘regular’(meaningallitselementsarepositive–and,ofcourse,thecolumnsallsumto1),thenraisingthe
4ThosewithagreaterfamiliarityofMatrixAlgebrawillrecognizethisasthedotproductofthefirstcolumnandthetranspositionofthefirstrow.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page13
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
matrixtoincreasinglylargerpowerswilleventuallybringittoa‘steadystate’whereinalltheelementsapproachalimitingvalue(referredtoasanasymptoticquality).Asithappens,theWTItransitionmatrixreachesitslimitveryquickly(inlessthan5days),ascanbeseenbelow:
5Thesteady‐statevectorcanbefoundbyfirstfindingtheeigenvectorresultingfromtheeigenvalue+1.Thiseigenvectorwillbeamultipleofthesteady‐statevectorwhichcanbefoundbyscalingitscomponentssuchthattheysumto1.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page14
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
TABLE5:TRANISITIONMATRIXRAISEDTOINCREASINGPOWERS
Matrix A
D S U
D 46.61% 41.13% 48.44%
S 1.74% 4.03% 1.65%
U 51.65% 54.84% 49.90%
Matrix A2
D S U
D 47.46% 47.39% 47.43%
S 1.73% 1.78% 1.73%
U 50.81% 50.82% 50.83%
Matrix A3
D S U
D 47.44% 47.44% 47.45%
S 1.74% 1.74% 1.74%
U 50.82% 50.82% 50.82%
Matrix A4
D S U
D 47.44% 47.44% 47.44%
S 1.74% 1.74% 1.74%
U 50.82% 50.82% 50.82%
Matrix A10
D S U
D 47.44% 47.44% 47.44%
S 1.74% 1.74% 1.74%
U 50.82% 50.82% 50.82%
Matrix A100
D S U
D 47.44% 47.44% 47.44%
S 1.74% 1.74% 1.74%
U 50.82% 50.82% 50.82%
Matrix A1000
D S U
D 47.44% 47.44% 47.44%
S 1.74% 1.74% 1.74%
U 50.82% 50.82% 50.82%
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page15
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
ItcanbeseenintheabovethattheWTIsteadystateisachievedbyDay(n+4)–theprobabilitiesinMatrixAraisedtothe4thpowerareexactlythesamewhenraisedtothe10th,100thor1,000thpower.Noteaswellthattheprobabilitiesineachofthecolumnsduplicateeachother–thismeansthat,bythefourthday,itdoesnotmatterwhattheinitialstatewas–theoutcomeprobabilitiesarethesameregardlessofwhereonestarted.Therefore,forlong‐termestimation,oneneednottakeintoaccountthestartingstate,theprobabilityofexperiencingaD,SorUonanygivendayinthefutureremainsstatic,namely;D=47.44%,S=1.74%,andU=50.82%6Similarly,fortheWeeklyData,theTransitionMatrixcanbeseeninTable3above(theTwo‐Weekmatrix)andthismatrixisalsoquicklyasymptotic,reachingasteady‐stateafterbeingraisedtothepowerofseven.TABLE6:WEEKLYSTEADYSTATEPROBABILITIES
Weekly Data - Steady State
D S U
D 46.827% 46.827% 46.827%
S 0.406% 0.406% 0.406%
U 52.767% 52.767% 52.767%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
CHI‐SQUARETESTS
Atlastwehavesufficientbackgroundtoattendtotheinitialquestion:“DoWTIoilpricemovementsfollowaMarkovChain?”TheChi‐Squarestatisticisagoodness‐of‐fittestthatwecanusetoaskthequestion;‘Howlikelyisit,baseduponrandomvariationalone,thattheobservedWTIoutcomeswoulddifferasmuchastheydofromtheexpectedoutcomes–assumingthatWTIpricedoesmoveinaMarkovchain?’TheChi‐squarestatisticis:
² ∑
However,onecannotuse‘scaled’orproportionateinputsforthechi‐squarecalculation–thepercentagedatathathasbeensoconvenienttouseinmatrixformuptothispointwillgive
6Somemaypointoutthatthesesteady‐stateprobabilitiesderivedfromtheTransitionMatrixaresimplythesumoftherowsintheveryfirst2‐dayfrequencystatisticsfromTable1.D=47.45%=(22.11%+0.71%+24.63%);S=1.74%=(0.83%+0.07%+0.84%);U=50.82%=(24.50%+0.95%+25.37%).Thisisoftenthecasewithmoresophisticatedmeasurementfunctions–theyonlyservetoconfirmwhatweintuitivelywouldhavesuspectedtobethetruthbutwithoutstatisticalproof.Withonlytherelativefrequencies,forexample,wedidnotknowthattheMarkovprobabilitieswouldconvergetoasteady‐statelimitorhowquicklythismayhappen.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page16
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
erroneouschi‐squarestatistics.7Wemustactuallyusethecountdata,which,forexample,forthetenday‐chain,was:TABLE7
10 Day-Chain Observations
D S U
D 1,577 51 1,757
S 59 5 60
U 1,748 68 1,810
3,384 124 3,627
Theten‐dayexpectedmatrixdataisafunctionoftheA10matrixinTable5–thatis,iftheWTIpricesdofollowaMarkovchain,wewouldexpectthepossibilityofaDstateonday10tobe47.44%(regardlessofthestartingstate),anSoutcomewouldoccur1.74%ofthetimeand,finallyanUoutcomehastheprobabilityof50.82%.Thisinformation,combinedwiththefactthatweknowtherewere7,13510‐daychainsinthehistoricdata(simplythesumofthecolumntotalsfromTable6)leadsustotheconclusionthatthe10‐DayExpectedMatrixwouldbe:TABLE8
10-Day Expected Outcome
D S U
D 1,606 59 1,721
S 59 2 63
U 1,720 63 1,843
3,385 124 3,627
Theresultingchi‐squarestatisticfromthecomparisonofthesetwomatricesis8.44.Applicable‘DegreesofFreedom‘forthistestis8.8Wewillassumea.05or5%alphasignificance.OurnullhypothesisisthattheWTIpricesdofollowaMarkovchainandthereforeanyvariancewefindbetweentheactualobservedcountsandthehypotheticallyexpectedarejusttheresultofrandomvariation(i.e.chance).Thechi‐squarestatisticcalculateshowprobableitwouldbetoencounterthecalculatedvariancejustbaseduponrandomchancealone.Ifwefindthatthereislessthana5%chancethatsuchachi‐squareoutcomecouldbeobservedasaresultofrandomchance,thenwemustrejectthenullhypothesisandconcludethatWTIpricesdonotfollowaMarkovchain.ConsultingaChi‐squaretablequicklyshowsthat,at8dfandχ2=8.44thestatisticiswellabovethe25%probabilitymark(anyreliablestatisticssoftwarepackagewillreportthattheactualprobabilityis39.1%).Therefore,baseduponthe10‐daychainalone,wewouldnotrejecttheconclusionthatWTIpricesfollowaMarkovchain.
7Specifically,alltheexpectedcountsmustbe>thanone–andbydefinitionaprobability%willnotqualify.8ThereisoftenconsiderableconfusionaboutDegreesofFreedom(df)forthechi‐squaretests.Theissuedependsuponwhetherasingle‐sampletestofindependenceisbeingperformed(inwhichcase,therelevantdfwouldbe(rows–1)(columns–1)andwouldamountto4fortheabove.However,agoodness‐of‐fittestisacomparisonbetweentwosamples:theactualobservedandthehypotheticallyexpected,thereforethedfis(k–1)wherekisthenumberofcellsinthetwo‐waytable.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page17
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
Similarly,theχ2wascalculatedforallthe10‐Day,100‐Dayand1,000‐Dayand10‐Week,100‐Weekand1,000‐Weekchains.Innocasewastherereasontorejectthenullhypothesis.WhilewecanreasonablyconcludethatWTIpricesdofollowaMarkovchain9,wearemoreinterestedintheresultsofthelonger1,000‐periodchainsasweareattemptingtomodellong‐term,ratherthanshorttermWTIprices.
9Tobeprecise,wehavenoevidencetorejecttheassumptionthatWTIfollowsaMarkovchain.ThisisdecidedlydifferentthanhavingproofpositivethatWTIdoesfollowaMarkovchain.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page18
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
TABLE9:CHI‐SQUARESTATISTICS
Chi-square results (8 df) CHAIN LENGTH χ2 α Prob. Reject Ho?
10-Day Chains 8.45 39.1% No
100-Day Chains 8.89 35.2% No
1000-Day Chains 11.00 20.2% No
10-Week Chains 12.68 12.3% No
100-Week Chains 12.90 11.5% No
1000-Week Chains 6.78 56.1% No
TIMEHOMOGENEITY
OneoftherequirementsofMarkovprobabilitiesistheassumptionoftimehomogeneity.Thatis,theprobabilityofmovingfromagivenstatetothenextstateisassumedtoremainconstantovertime.InthecaseofWTIpricemovements,wecanspeculatethatthisisarequirementthatisnotstrictlyadheredto.Weknowforcertain,forexample,thatWTIpricesexhibitsperiodsofgreaterandlesservolatility(seeFigure4).TheseperiodsmayalsobeassociatedwithvaryingprobabilitiesbetweenD,S,andUstates.Wemightalsospeculatethat,duringtimesofeconomicboon,thefrequencyofUmovementsincreasesand,correspondingly,theDfrequencymayincreaseduringperiodsofeconomicrecession.Thepertinentquestionbecomes:‘HowmightthisinfractionofthetimehomogeneityrequirementimpairourabilitytouseaMarkovprobabilitymodeltopredictfuturepricesteps?
Theanswertothisquestionisbeyondthescopeofthispaperandiscertainlydeservingofapaperallonitsown.Sufficeittosaythat,onayear‐over‐yearbasis,thereisconsiderablevariationamongstthestatespaceprobabilities.Completedetailsofall28individualyearsareprovidedinAppendix2.Tohighlightthedailyextremes,however,insomeyearstheDDchainrepresentedasmuchas54.5%ofallDXmovementswhereasinothersitdroppedtoonly36.8%.InpeakyearstheUUchainoccurred61.7%ofallUXmovementsandthisdroppedtoaslowas38.8%inotheryears.
Inspiteofdemonstratingloweroverallpricevolatility,theweeklychaindatademonstratedanevengreatervariance.InsomeyearstheDDchainrepresented71%ofallpossibleDXoutcomeswhereasinothersitdroppedto23.5%.Attheotherextreme,UUchainsrangedbetweenahighof71%ofallUXoutcomestoalowof36.8%.
Iftherelevantperioduponwhichtomeasuretimehomogeneityisone‐yearinlength,thenwecandefinitelyconcludethattheWTIpricemovementsarecompromisedinthischaracteristic.WTIpricemovementsdonotadheretoahomogenousprobabilitymatrixthroughtime.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page19
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
FIGURE410
CONCLUSIONS
ThispaperhasdiscussedtheprimarycharacteristicsofMarkovchainsandhowtheymayapplytothemovementofWTIpricesbetweenprice“states”(Down,SameandUp).ThemostimportantMarkovpropertyisthatonlythecurrentstatehasanypredictivebearinguponthenextstate–allpreviouspricemovementsbeforethecurrentstateareirrelevantinthepredictionofwhereWTIpricemaygonext.WetestedfortheexistenceofaMarkovchainusingsimplestatisticsaswellasviaaformalChi‐squareapproachandfound,inallcases,thattheWTIpricemovementsdostronglyexhibitthisqualityofaMarkovchain.Further,weidentifiedthetransitionmatrixforboththedailyandweeklyMarkovprobabilitiesandfoundthat,inbothcases,theasymptoticlimitsarequicklyachievedandasteadystateisrealizedonlyafterafewfutureperiods.Aconfoundingcomplexity,however,isthattheposthocWTIhistoricaldatadoesnotdemonstratetimehomogeneity.Infact,thereisconsiderablevariationinthesingleyearMarkovprobabilitiesovertimeanditremainstobeseenjusthowsuchadefectwillimpairourabilitytoreasonablypredictfutureWTIstates.
10Theweeklyvolatilityparallelstheebbsandflowsofdailydata,butisexpectedlylessineachyear.Thisisbecausethedailyfluctuationsadds‘noise’tothevolatilitycalculation.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Annual WTI Price Volatility: Daily vs. Weekly Data
Daily Data: Annualized Single‐Year WTI Volatility
Weekly Data: Annualized Single‐Year WTI Volatility
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page20
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
Wehavenotyetbeguntoconsiderhowlargethesizeofeachstepbetweenthevariousstatesshouldbe(i.e.thedollaramountofaUorDmove).Thistopicislefttobeinvestigatedinthefollowingpaper.
WehavediscussedtheconceptualissuessurroundingMarkovprobabilitiesandmatrixalgebrasufficientlythatweshouldnowbeabletoapplythesteady‐stateprobabilitiesinanactualMonteCarlomodeldesignedtopredictfuturestatesoftheWTIpricemovements.Thiswillbethesubjectofthenextandconcludingpaperinthisseries.
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page21
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX1
WEEKLY DATA: Frequency of 'XX' Ending Chains in EIA Data
Two-Week Chains Week n Observation
D S U
Week (n + 1) Observation
D 24.15% 0.20% 22.46%S 0.27% 0.00% 0.14%U 22.33% 0.20% 30.24%
100% *
Ten-Week Chains Week n Observation
D S U
Week (n + 1) Observation
D 23.81% 0.20% 22.52%S 0.27% 0.00% 0.14%U 22.45% 0.20% 30.41%
100% *
Ten-Week Chains Week n Observation
D S U
Week (n + 1) Observation
D 24.06% 0.22% 22.46%S 0.29% 0.00% 0.14%U 22.32% 0.22% 30.29%
100% *
Ten-Week Chains Week n Observation
D S U
Week (n + 1) Observation
D 23.33% 0.00% 22.50%S 0.21% 0.00% 0.00%U 22.08% 0.21% 31.67%
100% * * The sum of all 9 observations total 100% as expected
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page22
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX2
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL MARKOV PROBABILITIES 1986 THROUGH 2013 DAILY DATA WEEKLY DATA
YEAR YEAR
1986 D S U 1986 D S U
D 49.57% 33.33% 45.16% D 56.00% 0.00% 42.31%
S 3.42% 0.00% 4.03% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 47.01% 66.67% 50.81% U 44.00% 0.00% 57.69%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1987 D S U 1987 D S U
D 50.00% 50.00% 44.26% D 53.85% 0.00% 46.15%
S 5.00% 0.00% 4.92% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 45.00% 50.00% 50.82% U 46.15% 0.00% 53.85%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1988 D S U 1988 D S U
D 36.84% 50.00% 50.37% D 45.83% 0.00% 44.83%
S 4.39% 0.00% 0.73% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 58.77% 50.00% 48.91% U 54.17% 0.00% 55.17%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1989 D S U 1989 D S U
D 38.26% 25.00% 51.49% D 42.86% 0.00% 38.71%
S 3.48% 0.00% 2.99% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 58.26% 75.00% 45.52% U 57.14% 0.00% 61.29%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1990 D S U 1990 D S U
D 50.39% 40.00% 51.22% D 46.15% 0.00% 57.69%
S 2.33% 0.00% 1.63% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 47.29% 60.00% 47.15% U 53.85% 0.00% 42.31%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1991 D S U 1991 D S U
D 43.44% 50.00% 50.78% D 53.85% 0.00% 42.31%
S 3.28% 0.00% 1.56% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 53.28% 50.00% 47.66% U 46.15% 0.00% 57.69%
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page23
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL MARKOV PROBABILITIES 1986 THROUGH 2013 DAILY DATA WEEKLY DATA
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1992 D S U 1992 D S U
D 45.24% 54.55% 53.33% D 52.17% 50.00% 40.74%
S 2.38% 0.00% 6.67% S 4.35% 0.00% 3.70%
U 52.38% 45.46% 40.00% U 43.48% 50.00% 55.56%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
1993 D S U 1993 D S U
D 50.00% 14.29% 61.68% D 61.77% 0.00% 63.16%
S 2.94% 14.29% 1.87% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 47.06% 71.43% 36.45% U 38.24% 0.00% 36.84%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1994 D S U 1994 D S U
D 51.24% 0.00% 46.51% D 31.58% 0.00% 42.42%
S 0.83% 0.00% 0.78% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 47.93% 100.00% 52.71% U 68.42% 0.00% 57.58%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1995 D S U 1995 D S U
D 44.14% 33.33% 44.03% D 45.83% 0.00% 42.86%
S 1.80% 0.00% 2.99% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 54.05% 66.67% 52.99% U 54.17% 0.00% 57.14%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1996 D S U 1996 D S U
D 42.59% 33.33% 43.57% D 42.86% 0.00% 38.71%
S 1.85% 16.67% 2.14% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 55.56% 50.00% 54.29% U 57.14% 0.00% 61.29%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1997 D S U 1997 D S U
D 51.88% 46.15% 54.72% D 70.97% 50.00% 47.37%
S 3.76% 15.39% 5.66% S 6.45% 0.00% 0.00%
U 44.36% 38.46% 39.62% U 22.58% 50.00% 52.63%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page24
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL MARKOV PROBABILITIES 1986 THROUGH 2013 DAILY DATA WEEKLY DATA
1998 D S U 1998 D S U
D 54.48% 66.67% 50.88% D 67.65% 0.00% 55.56%
S 1.49% 0.00% 0.88% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 44.03% 33.33% 48.25% U 32.35% 0.00% 44.44%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
1999 D S U 1999 D S U
D 47.66% 60.00% 38.85% D 36.84% 0.00% 38.24%
S 0.94% 0.00% 2.88% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 51.40% 40.00% 58.27% U 63.16% 0.00% 61.77%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2000 D S U 2000 D S U
D 44.14% 50.00% 43.80% D 45.46% 0.00% 36.67%
S 0.00% 0.00% 1.46% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 55.86% 50.00% 54.75% U 54.55% 0.00% 63.33%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2001 D S U 2001 D S U
D 53.49% 0.00% 50.85% D 53.57% 0.00% 58.33%
S 1.55% 0.00% 0.85% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 44.96% 100.00% 48.31% U 46.43% 0.00% 41.67%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2002 D S U 2002 D S U
D 44.44% 14.29% 43.70% D 45.46% 0.00% 40.00%
S 2.78% 14.29% 2.22% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 52.78% 71.43% 54.07% U 54.55% 0.00% 60.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2003 D S U 2003 D S U
D 41.38% 50.00% 50.76% D 47.83% 100.00% 35.71%
S 1.72% 0.00% 0.00% S 0.00% 0.00% 3.57%
U 56.90% 50.00% 49.24% U 52.17% 0.00% 60.71%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
2004 D S U 2004 D S U
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page25
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL MARKOV PROBABILITIES 1986 THROUGH 2013 DAILY DATA WEEKLY DATA
D 41.18% 0.00% 55.04% D 59.09% 0.00% 29.03%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.78% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 58.82% 100.00% 44.19% U 40.91% 0.00% 70.97%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2005 D S U 2005 D S U
D 40.74% 75.00% 43.17% D 54.17% 0.00% 39.29%
S 2.78% 0.00% 0.72% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 56.48% 25.00% 56.12% U 45.83% 0.00% 60.71%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2006 D S U 2006 D S U
D 46.28% 0.00% 51.56% D 45.83% 0.00% 50.00%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 53.72% 0.00% 48.44% U 54.17% 0.00% 50.00%
100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2007 D S U 2007 D S U
D 43.70% 66.67% 49.23% D 33.33% 0.00% 32.35%
S 1.68% 0.00% 0.77% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 54.62% 33.33% 50.00% U 66.67% 0.00% 67.65%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2008 D S U 2008 D S U
D 53.49% 0.00% 48.78% D 68.75% 0.00% 50.00%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.81% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 46.51% 100.00% 50.41% U 31.25% 0.00% 50.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2009 D S U 2009 D S U
D 50.41% 0.00% 45.80% D 23.53% 0.00% 37.14%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 49.59% 0.00% 54.20% U 76.47% 0.00% 62.86%
100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2010 D S U 2010 D S U
D 52.42% 100.00% 45.67% D 47.62% 0.00% 37.50%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.79% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page26
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
APPENDIX 2: ANNUAL MARKOV PROBABILITIES 1986 THROUGH 2013 DAILY DATA WEEKLY DATA
U 47.58% 0.00% 53.54% U 52.38% 0.00% 62.50%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2011 D S U 2011 D S U
D 42.02% 0.00% 51.88% D 41.67% 0.00% 46.43%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 57.98% 0.00% 48.12% U 58.33% 0.00% 53.57%
100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
2012 D S U 2012 D S U
D 47.86% 100.00% 44.78% D 65.52% 0.00% 45.46%
S 0.86% 0.00% 0.00% S 3.45% 0.00% 0.00%
U 51.28% 0.00% 55.22% U 31.03% 100.00% 54.55%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
2013 D S U 2013 D S U
D 45.38% 0.00% 49.62% D 60.00% 0.00% 40.74%
S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% S 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
U 54.62% 0.00% 50.38% U 40.00% 0.00% 59.26%
100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Copyright2014ConnValuationServicesLtd.Allrightsreserved,nopartofthisworkmaybereproducedwithouttheowner’sexpresswrittenpermission. Page27
CONN VALUATION SERVICES LTD.
REFERENCES
Xu,H.,Zhang,Z.X.,ATrendDeductionModelofFluctuationOilPrices,(revised2011),InstituteofInternationalStudies,FudanUniversity,Shanghai
Mostafaei,H.etal.,ModellingthefluctuationsofBrentoilpricesbyaprobabilisticMarkovchain,(2011),JournalofComputations&Modelling,vol.1,no.2,17–26
Abazi,A.,StochasticVolatilityintheCrudeOilPrices:AMarkovChainMonteCarloApproach,(2003),unpublishedthesis
Sirdari,M.Z.etal.,AsationaritytestonMarkovchainmodelsbasedonmarginaldistribution,SchoolofMathematicalSciences,UniversitiSainsMalaysia