Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

MODULE 9:MODULE 9:

LINKING INTEGRATED LINKING INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

ASSESSMENT TO POLICYASSESSMENT TO POLICY

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

IntroductionIntroduction

This module shows you how to link SOE reporting to policy formulation, the major objective of IEA. The module discusses:

The various types of policy Interlinkages which should be

observed and conflicts which should be avoided in policy

Environmental policy analysis

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

The place of policy formulation in IEAThe place of policy formulation in IEA

Within the overall sequence of questions/steps, policy formulation comes after knowing the state of the environment (i.e. what is happening).

We ask the following questions (see next slide): How are current policies affecting the

state of the environment (under Question 1)?

Do the current policies contribute to what is happening?

What policies are in place that are intended to deal with the current environmental issues and how effective are they (under Question 3)?

What alternative actions could be taken (under Question 5)?

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Showing the place of current policy analysis in IEAShowing the place of current policy analysis in IEA

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Environmental policy as rules to use the Environmental policy as rules to use the physical environmentphysical environment

Environmental policies stand as rules governing the interaction between human beliefs, values and ideas, and the physical environment

They provide guidelines on how to use the physical environment within the values of a social group.

May be used to direct a community to use the physical environment wisely within rules that will promote sustainable development.

Often, the progression is from rules that discourage bad practices to those that seek compliance with good practices.

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Showing the place of environmental policiesShowing the place of environmental policies

         

        

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Types of policiesTypes of policies

Policies may be categorized according to the way they are formed:

Routine policies: formulated through routine, deliberate and slow progression of the normal steps.

Urgent reactive policies: formulated outside the normal process, commonly to solve a crisis or emergencies (e.g. flood, drought).

Grey zone policies: not backed by documentation but used as if they do. May evolve to routine policies over time.

All policies, however formed, should be

subjected to assessment to judge how they impact on the environment

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Nested PoliciesNested Policies

Policies addressing the same issue may be nested with narrowly focussed policies linked to a series of broader policies. The nesting may be within a country or from a global to a local level.

Global level – general agreement of what the rules should be may be included in a convention. Gaps of countries which may not sign may be expected.

Regional level – interests are likely to be more similar, but still gaps may be expected.

National – policy has different enforcement rules and all are expected to abide by the policy

Sub-national/local – very detailed regulations and enforcement

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

An example of nested policies: from An example of nested policies: from global to localglobal to local

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Uncoordinated policies may Uncoordinated policies may conflictconflict

The environment is ONE and all policies on it are interlinked. Coordination among policies is essential. But this may be difficult to sustain for many reasons:

Governments may have competing responsibilities which may conflict with promoting a sustainable environment within the limitations of their resources (e.g. job creation, food production, etc.).

Hangover from the past when environmental policies may not have been directed at sustainable development

Opportunists may hijack or misdirect some good environmental policies where institutions of law enforcement are weak or uninformed

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Botswana’s conflicting environmental policies in Botswana’s conflicting environmental policies in the 1970’s and 1980’sthe 1970’s and 1980’s

        

  

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Environmental policy Environmental policy analysisanalysis

Consists of evaluating current set of policies for a particular issue with the intention of improving its effectiveness.

Part of a cyclical and continuous process by which policy may be improved: Evaluate what policies currently exist Identify where such policies fall short

of what is required in promoting sustainable development

Determine what adjustments are required on existing policies and what new policies are needed to make the set of policies under analysis more effective

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Step 1 – Step 1 – Identify and list current Identify and list current environmental policies and environmental policies and legislationlegislation

Broadly Identify policies relevant to the issue of interest

Decide on a consistent criteria for selecting policies to include in a current environmental policy analysis, e.g. relevance to the public and decision-makers. Criteria will depend on individual circumstances.

Consider in your criteria some international obligations relevant to the issue of analysis

Select a manageable number of the available policies to be included in the analysis in a holistic manner by determining which of the policies have the potential to have a direct impact on the issues of concern.

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Step 2 – Step 2 – Identify performance Identify performance criteria for the selected key criteria for the selected key policiespolicies A policy should have an in-built performance criteria at its formulation, but sometimes this is not the case

Criteria developed may be general and descriptive or specific and quantitative. Some examples: Threshold: a value may be identified

beyond which an environmental system may be self-sustaining

Benchmark: evaluation of the performance of an environmental system may be based on relative performance when compared to known best cases under similar circumstances

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Step 3 – Step 3 – Evaluate selected Evaluate selected policiespolicies

Ideally, expectations should be outlined at policy formulation in which case: Expectations will be used to judge system

performance for outcomes (next slide) Analysis may be made to evaluate whether

original expectations were realistic or if either expectations or the system need to be adjusted

Where expectations were not outlined originally, policy performance is carried out on key variables selected in Step 1 using criteria determined in Step 2

Div

isi o

n O

f E

ar ly

Wa

rnin

g A

nd

As s

ess

me

nt

Comparing expected performance with actual Comparing expected performance with actual performance of an environmental systemperformance of an environmental system