Upload
cindy
View
43
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DFHRS (Digital FEM Height Reference Surface) – A Rigorous Approach for the Integrated Adjustment of Fitted Height Reference Surfaces (HRS) -. Reiner Jäger Hochschule Karlsruhe Technik und Wirtschaft - University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Geomatics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS (Digital FEM Height Reference Surface) – A Rigorous Approach for the Integrated Adjustment of
Fitted Height Reference Surfaces (HRS) -
Reiner JägerHochschule Karlsruhe Technik und Wirtschaft - University of Applied Sciences
Faculty of Geomatics
Studiengang Vermessung und Geomatik & International Programme Geomatics (MSc)
Institut für Angewandte Forschung (IAF)
Moltkestrasse 30, D-76133 Karlsruhe
www.dfhbf.de ; www.geozilla.de; www.dfhbf.de ; www.geozilla.de;
www.galileo-bw.de; www.moldpos.euwww.galileo-bw.de; www.moldpos.eu
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Height Systems - Definitions and Terrestrial Realisiation
HH
Geoid = IdealGeoid = IdealHeight Reference Surface Height Reference Surface
(HRS)(HRS)
hh
NN
22
2),,,,,(
),,(),,( pzdydxd
zyxzyxl
zyxzyxWW
ErdeP
APoP WWC i
E
AiAP ngCC
P
PorthP
P
PNormalP g
CHbzw
CH ,, .
GepotentialNumbers C
Levelling and Gravity Observations
Terrestrial Height Determination
H=const. H=const. Small AreaSmall Area ~ „constant~ „constantWaterlevel“Waterlevel“
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
NewNewEuropeanEuropean
Normal-HeightNormal-HeightNetworkNetwork
EUREF/UELN ‚95/98EUREF/UELN ‚95/98
AdjustmentAdjustmentbyby
GeopotentialGeopotentialNumbers (DifferencesNumbers (Differences
DatumspointDatumspointWW00 bzw. C bzw. C00
AmsterdamAmsterdam„„NAP“NAP“
DHHN‘92DHHN‘92( Diff.: 1 cm)( Diff.: 1 cm)
Accuracy Accuracy SituationSituation
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
H = h - N
GNSS-Heightung
„HH from h-GNSS“
HRS-Model N
hh
hh NN
HH„„HRS“HRS“GeoidGeoid
QuasigeoidQuasigeoid
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
)(cosP)msinSmcosC(r
a1(
r
MGV nmnmnm
n
2n
n
0m
Gravity Potential W of the Earth at Point P(r,λ, )
ZVW
22
2sinr
2Z
Gravitational Potential of the Earth Masses
HRS = Geoid / Quasigeoid – Physical Definition & Realisation
Centrifgal - Potential due to Earth-Rotation
Q
80GRSOG
),,r(U),,r(V),,r(N
Hg
NN QGG
Q-Geoid
Geoid (W=Wo=const)
Spherical Harmonics Coefficients as Parameters
HBFHBF
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Original Observation: LaserrangesDerived of it: Orbit Disturbances Derived of it: Spherical Harmonics (Müller/Kaula, 1960,1962Spherical Harmonics (Müller/Kaula, 1960,1962))
Satellite Geodetic Methods of Gravity Field Determination
• Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) „„LEOS“ LEOS“ (L(Low ow EEartharth O Orbitrbit SatellitesSatellites))
LAGEOS 1, 2LAGEOS 1, 2STELLA, etc.
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Observation Quantities1.) Abs. Positionierung via GPS (Black-Jack Receiver/NASA, JPL): x(t)2.) Relative Orbitmovements by Inter-Satellite Observations:3.) Precise Accelerometers ai STAR (Onera/Frankreich):4.) Gradiometers (e.g. GOCE)
Derived of these: 1.) Orbit Determinations 2.) Gravitational Accelerations gi(x,t) and Gradiometer-Tensor
(t)xd (t)xd
• Present Missions Hybride Sensors Aktice Measurements
iiii )( axgx
Derived from that: Spherical Harmonics CoefficientsSpherical Harmonics Coefficients
CHAMP
Satellite Geodetic Methods of Gravity Field Determination
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
EIGEN ( = EEIGEN ( = European IImproved GGravity Model of the EEarth by NNew Techniques)
[cm]
H
H
J
Earth Geopotential MModel 966 (NASA)
H
H
J
Satellite Geodetic Methods of Gravity Field Determination
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
EIGEN ( = EEIGEN ( = European IImproved GGravity Model of the EEarth by NNew Techniques)
[cm]
H
H
J
Earth Geopotential MModel 966 (NASA)
H
H
J -28
-27
-26
-25
-24
-23
-22
-21
-20
-19
-18
-17
N(p)
Latitude(degree)Longitude(dgree)
DFHRS_DB Namibia and Tanzania: 1.) Identical Points (N=h-H) & 2.) EGM96 bzw. EIGEN-GL04C
Satellite Geodetic Methods of Gravity Field Determination
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Bilance for Satellite Geodetic GPM(EGM2008; EIGEN)
)(cosP)msinSmcosC(r
a1(
r
MGV nmnmnm
n
2n
n
0m
n,m < 500 => N < 0.3 m ! =>N < 0.3 m ! => Not sufficient for GNSS-HeightingH = h – NN !!!
Further Information for further Improvement of the HRS HRS and N N
necessary! Hybrid and redundant Models!
TerrestrialGravity
Measurements IdenticalPoints (H, h)
N=h-H
““GeoidGeoidFitting“Fitting“
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Short-Waved: ~ (1 – 3) cmMedium-/Long Waved
0.1-1.5 m !
2
096EGM
0
96EGM
dd)(S)gg(4
a
NN
0
1.) EGG97 - EuropeanGravimetric QGeoid 1997
(IfE, Hannover)
(h, H)(h, H)
Hybride Modeling in HRS-Computation
Weg 1: Stokes-based
RepresentationRepresentationGRIDGRID
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
r
)S,C(W
S,C(W
cosr
1
S,C(W
r
1
g
g
g
nmnm
)nmnm
)nmnm
U
W
N
)S,C(VU)Hh( nmnmref,80GRSQ
Q
PTNHh
Z)S,C(VW nmnm96EGM
(h, H)(h, H)
++
++
Dgl.-based
2.) Prof. Dr.-Ing. H.-G. Wenzel – Fitted Geopotenzialmodell (GPM 98GPM 98)
n = m = 1800 Accuracy of N ~ (10 - 30) cm
Parametrice Represenation (or Grid)
Hybride Modeling in HRS-Computation
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
))z,y,x(M und )SC((T1
vN ifRenmmnQ
fRe
))z,y,x(M;)S,C((gg ifRenmmn
3.) „BKG-Model – Parametrisation of the Potentials by additional Mass Points
(h, H)(h, H)
))z,y,x(M und )SC((T1
v)hH( ifRenmmnQ
Massen-Points as essential additional ParametersMassen-Points as essential additional Parameters
Representation of BKG HRS: Grid
Hybride Modeling in HRS-Computation
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
H = hGPS
(B,L) - DFHRS(B,L,h) korr
HH = hGPS(B,L) - (NFEM(p|B,L,h) + ∆m·h)
DFHRS-DB
Direct Direct - No - No IdenticalIdenticalPoints -Points -
- Online- Online -
Postpro-cessed
DFHRS-ConceptDFHRS-Concept
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
FEM representation of height reference surfaces
l
i
il
j
ji
mijnijmnnm
nm
nm
xyaaxyNxyNxyN
y
x
0 0,,,
,
,
0
0
,,,,
0
0
, pp
3D difference at any point P(x,y) along the border SA_SE of the meshes m and n has to vanish
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
! 0tNxxtxyytyaa n,mj
sasesai
sasesal
0i
il
0jm,ijn,ij
l
0i
il
0j
jim,ijn,ijmn,
xyaa
0
0
N
0
0
! 00
2210,
l
k
kk
kknm tctctctcctN
l,0k ,0x,y;x,y;;c sesesasank ppm
l
i
il
j
ji
mijnijmnnm
nm
nm
xyaaxyNxyNxyN
y
x
0 0,,,
,
,
0
0
,,,,
0
0
, pp
Continuous Finite Element Representation of HRSContinuous Finite Element Representation of HRS
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
FEM representation of height reference surfaces
Result: Continuous Height Reference Surface: NFEM(p)
nm2,1,0
l
0i
il
0jk
Tjik,ijk
FEM
;C
xyaNN
pp
pfp
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DDigital igital FFEM EM HHeight eight RReference eference SSurface (DFHRS)- Concepturface (DFHRS)- Concept
hGNSS+ v = H + NFEM(p) - hGPS· m
H + v = H
NG‘j + v j = NFEM(p) + NG(d j)
j + v = - FB / M(B) p + (d,) j
j + v = - FL/(N(B)cos(B)) p + (d,) j
Complete New Computation of continuous HRS (p and m)!
DFHRS – Adjustment ApproachState of the Art < 2005< 2005
)(4 B
a g·S()dσ + v = NFEM(p)
NFEM(p)
N(pj)
(Global, regional, local)
<= Sets of Deflections from Vertical
(Zenith Cameras or Geoidmodels)
<= GPS/Levelling Fitting Points
<= Any number Geoidmodels
<= „Gravity“ by correlated Geoidmodels In the sense of an 2 step adjustment
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
EGG97European
GravimetricGeoid 1997
Mean- up to lang-wavedErrors
0.1 – 1.5 m !
=> New Concepts,more „precise“ or better: (H,h)-fitted
solutions
Weak-Shapes of Classical
Gravimetric
„Geoid“models
2
0Re
0
Re
)()(4
0
ddSgga
NN
f
f
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Tallinn Tallinn ExampleExample
Pure Geoid-Approach
EGG97-Geoid
without DatumN(d)
+/- 3.5 cm „Tilt“
15km
15mm
Ne t
Re sid ua ls
Standard GNSS/GPS-heighting Approaches using identical Points
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Tallinn Tallinn ExampleExample
Pure Geoidapproach
EGG97-Geoid
With DatumN(d)
+/- 4 mm 15kmNe t
20mmRe sid ua ls
HBF:= NG + NG(d)
Standard GNSS/GPS-heighting Approaches using identical Points
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS SoftwareDFHRS Software
• Identical Identical „„Fitting“Fitting“PointsPoints
(B,L,h;H)(B,L,h;H)
• MeshesMeshes
• PatchesPatches
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Every geoid- and/or vertical deflection model N can be „patched“
DFHRS SoftwareDFHRS Software
NG(d j)
• Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft - University of Applied Sciences • LVA Baden-Württemberg• LVA Hessen• LVA Rheinland-Pfalz• LVA Riga, Latvia• University of Federal Forces Munich• University Darmstadt
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS_DB Design Parameters
<_3_cm DFHRS_DBWindhuk, NamibiaEGM96
Fitting Point Density Fitting Point Density (< 10 mm points, EGG97)(< 10 mm points, EGG97) • 50 points per (100 km x 100 km): <_1_cm DFHRS_DB50 points per (100 km x 100 km): <_1_cm DFHRS_DB
• 10 points per (100 km x 100 km): < 3_cm DFHRS_DB 10 points per (100 km x 100 km): < 3_cm DFHRS_DB • 3-4 points per (100 km x100 km): < 5-10_cm DFHRS_DB3-4 points per (100 km x100 km): < 5-10_cm DFHRS_DB
Meshsize Meshsize (p=3)(p=3)• 20-30 km : HRS approximation error < (5-10) cm20-30 km : HRS approximation error < (5-10) cm
•10 km: HRS approximation error <1 cm 10 km: HRS approximation error <1 cm • 5 km: HRS approximation error < 0.5 cm5 km: HRS approximation error < 0.5 cm
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS_DB Design Parameters
Design Studies < 5 - 10_cm DFHRS Germany
Patch-Size Patch-Size (EGG97)(EGG97)
• 30 - 40 km for a < 1_cm DFHRS_DB30 - 40 km for a < 1_cm DFHRS_DB• 50 – 60 km for a < 3_cm DFHRS_DB50 – 60 km for a < 3_cm DFHRS_DB
• 300 km for a < 10_cm DFHRS_DB300 km for a < 10_cm DFHRS_DB
(3-5) points per patch(3-5) points per patch
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
< 10cm DFHRS Europe – „Fittingpoint-Design“
ETRS89/EVRS
„GPS-/Levelling- Points of EVN“
Fitting Points
NFEM(p) =: h - H
Used for the 1st Version
< 10_cm DFHBFS Europe
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Austria Germany Estonia Latvia Lithuania Switzerland
Number of unused control points
9
95
21
25
46
13
RMS [cm]
7.5
4.2
8.8
9.2
6.8
7.0
<_10_cm DFHRS_DB - Indepent Quality Control
(Present Version, 35 km meshes, 34 Patches)<1_dm EVRF2004
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Overview aboutEuropean DFHRS_DB
30 kmMesh Size
10 km
5 km < 1 cm
< 3 cm
< 10 cm
2005
New 2006
2003
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS_DB - Product as CD-Installation of State Land Services in Germany CopyProtection inclusive
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
< 5 cm DFHRS_DB Florida (… Masterthesis )< 5 cm DFHRS_DB Florida (… Masterthesis )
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
5 km FEM Meshes
European DFHRS_DB… European DFHRS_DB… includingincluding
< 1 cm DFHRS_DB Ungary< 1 cm DFHRS_DB Ungary
Test - AreaTest - Area
(50 x 90 ) km (50 x 90 ) km 1-2_cm DFHRS_DB Budapest1-2_cm DFHRS_DB Budapest
DFHRS 4.0 DFHRS 4.0 SoftwareSoftware
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS in PracticeDFHRS in Practice
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFRHS – Extension to Gravity ObservationsDFRHS – Extension to Gravity ObservationsGeodetic Network Optimization - 1st/2nd/3rd Order Design: A,P =>CA,P =>Cpp
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS - Extension to Gravity ObservationsDFHRS - Extension to Gravity Observations
LAVg
g
0
0
Sensor-Observation
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
„<1cm-Resolution („2mm“) of HRS“
Instead of classical global spherical harmonics (n=m=7200)
Spherical Cap Harmonics(SCHA)
CapPP
Extension of the DFHRS-Concept to Gravity ObservationsExtension of the DFHRS-Concept to Gravity Observations
))'(cosP)'msin'S 'mcos'C(r
a
a
MG)',',r(V m)),k(nm),k(nm),k(n
maxk
0k
k
0m
1)k(n
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
0=90°
0 =arbitrary
0 =90°
l = 6,
l = 2,
l = 4
l(2) = 109.2714
l(6) = 290.9488 l(4) =200.4828
900P ml );(cos, 20P mkl );(cos),(
)(cos)( 0
P 90,mkl
0)(cos'P 2,m)k(l
0 arbitrary
GlobalSperical-Harmonics Spherical Cap Harmonics (SCHA)
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS - Extension to Gravity ObservationsDFHRS - Extension to Gravity Observations
80GRS;refmaxk
0k
k
0mm),k(n'm),k(nm),k(n
1)k(n
V- ) )'(cos'P)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
a()',',r(T
5.0)5.0,k(90
)k(nn SCHASHA
))'(cos'P)'msin'S 'mcos'C(r
a
a
MG)',',r(V m)),k(nm),k(nm),k(n
maxk
0k
k
0m
1)k(n
maxk
0k
k
0mm),k(n'm),k(nm),k(n
1)k(n
)'(cos'P)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
a)',',r(V
SCHA „Handling“
SCHA „Resolution“ („2mm Geoid“, n=7200 u =50.000.000)
α= 1° (=110 km area) => k-SCHA = 80 and u = 6.400
3° (=330 km area) => k-SCHA = 250 and u= 62.500α=
α= 25° (Europe) => k-SCHA = 2000 and u =4.000.000
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
DFHRS - Extension to Gravity ObservationsDFHRS - Extension to Gravity Observations
LAVg
g
0
0
Sensor-Observation at Position P(x,y,z)
TreatmentofGravityObservations
LAV
ECFLAV
ECF
z
y
x
g
0
0
),,L,B(R
g
g
g
TLGVgrav ]
r
V,
V
'sinr
1,
'
V
r
1[
g
ECFlcentrifuga
ECF
z
y
xECF
gravz
y
x
g
g
g
g
'g
'g
'g
ECFgrav
LGVECF
LGV
gravr
E
N
'g),(R
g
g
g
)(dg )'(cosP)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
)1)k(n(
r
avg
0k
k
0mm),k(nm),k(nm)),k(n
1)k(n
rLGVgrav d
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Treatment of GPM - EGM96 / EGM99, EIGEN, etc Treatment of GPM - EGM96 / EGM99, EIGEN, etc
0k
k
0mm),k(nm),k(nm),k(n
1)k(n
Q
jm),k(nm),k(n
jGPM
)'(cosP)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
a(
1
)(N)S,C(NvN d
)V 80GRS,ref
)(N jd
)V 80GRS,ref
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
hGNSS+ v = H + fT p - hGPS· m
H + v = H
NG‘j + v j = fT p + NG(d j)
j + v = - fBT
/ M(B) p + (d,) j
j + v = - fLT/(N(B)cos(B)) p + (d,)
j
)(4 Ba g·S()dσ + v = NFEM(p)= fT p
)(dg )'(cosP)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
)1)k(n(
r
avg
0k
k
0mm),k(nm),k(nm)),k(n
1)k(n
rLGVgrav d
NFEM(p)
N(pk)
Extension of the DFHRS-Concept to gravity observationsExtension of the DFHRS-Concept to gravity observations
0k
k
0m
jm),k(nm),k(nm),k(n
1)k(n
Q
jm),k(nm),k(n
jGPM
)(N)Vref)'(cosP)'msin'S'mcos'C(r
a(
1
)(N)S,C(NvN
d
d
)hm()'S,'C(Nv0 Tm),k(nm),k(nN pf
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Example Saarland: 825 Gravity ObservationsExample Saarland: 825 Gravity Observations
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Example Saarland (Jan. 06)Example Saarland (Jan. 06) DFHRS-Software DFHRS-Software with Computation with Computation DesignDesign
Version 1 ( 1cm Reference)Version 1 ( 1cm Reference)EGG97 („Gravity indirect“)EGG97 („Gravity indirect“)+ Identical Points+ Identical Points
Version 2 („Gravity indirect“)Version 2 („Gravity indirect“)Gravity Disturbances dgGravity Disturbances dgGPM98GPM98Identical PointsIdentical Points1 CAP 1 CAP
Result: 1_cm Coincidence of the HRS between Version 1 and Version 2Result: 1_cm Coincidence of the HRS between Version 1 and Version 2
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
„1_cm DFHRS of Baden-Württemberg“ (EIGEN-GPM, Gravity Values, Fitting Points)
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
„1_cm DFHRS of Baden-Württemberg“ (EIGEN-GPM, Gravity Values, Fitting Points)
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
„1_cm DFHRS of Baden-Württemberg“ (EIGEN-GPM, gravity values)
Number B[°] L[°] dg[mgal] v[mgal]--------------------------------------------------------------------6221803000 49.744402 9.325176 17.27052630 0.0166221803100 49.754800 9.320541 18.29553958 0.0046221810000 49.731079 9.322965 48.72880615 -0.0026221810100 49.767690 9.323488 16.90448271 -0.0096221810200 49.739588 9.295846 16.90117365 -0.005 : : : : :6222803100 49.787317 9.482121 25.19440159 -0.0066222803800 49.730625 9.411164 35.48699735 0.0126222803900 49.748882 9.486150 46.45989551 -0.0196222804000 49.735388 9.450240 45.58427649 -0.0226222804104 49.717601 9.439384 46.62347815 -0.0186222804204 49.702843 9.456634 55.15177619 -0.0296222810000 49.699664 9.417770 47.55625221 -0.003 : : : : :
Fig. 8DFHRS-software report for the gravity disturbances dg with the list of corrections v
MOLDPOS – Initial Meeting, Chisinau, 10-05-10 HRS-Computation and DFHRS-Concept Prof. Dr. Reiner Jäger, HSKA
Solution Concept for Solution Concept for HRS-Computation andHRS-Computation andGNSS-HeightingGNSS-Heighting
- Strict mathematical base for continuous FEM_HRS & **DFHRS-SoftwareDFHRS-Software*- New concept for an overdetermined BVP =>parametric HRS determination - Mesh and patch-design => Any accuracy and any! area size (<= FEM)- Open for all geometrical & physical (e.g. gravity) observations!- DFHRS = (Leading) Geoidfitting Concept- Ready for 1 cm EVRS using existing data +EPN densification fitting-points! - High practical relevance for GNSS services all over the world- Industrial Standard in GNSS-Equipment and GIS - DFHRS_DB => RTCM 3.q Message used in GNSS-Services, NTRIP etc. - High Capacities for International Cooperations and for EVRS