Deviance theory.pptlknkn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    1/24

    Ericksons Functionalist Perspective

    Deviance helps maintain boundaries of

    acceptable and unacceptable behavior.

    Deviance bolsters cohesion and solidarity of

    a community.

    Deviance promotes the stability of social

    life.

    Deviance provides employment.

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    2/24

    Erickson Continued.

    A deviant is someone whose actions/identities

    have moved outside the margins of the group-

    when society holds him/her accountable for it, itreinforces boundaries.

    Every time society reacts to deviance it sharpens

    its authority and power.

    Agencies designed to curtail deviance often

    perpetuate it.

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    3/24

    Durkheim

    Crime and deviance are normal, providedthey dont exceed a certain level.

    Deviance and Crime free societies areimpossible to attain (see example with druguse and legalization debate).

    The authority the moral conscience enjoysmust not be excessive. Individualoriginality must be able to express itself.

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    4/24

    Durkheim and Anomie

    Anomie= absence of social ties that bind people to society,

    state of where norms about good and bad have little

    salience in peoples lives. Outcome of advanced

    Capitalism and ideology of individualism (latter 20th

    century U.S.)

    Who are you responsible to? Example of deviance and

    responsibility.

    Weakening of social ties destabilizes society and leads to chaos. Collective good versus individual self-interest? Did Durkheim

    believe functional societys had to chose between these two things

    or did he advocate balance between them? Why?

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    5/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) As Becker relates, "Social groups create

    deviance [crime] by making the rules whose

    infraction constitutes deviance [crime], andby applying those rules to particular people

    and labeling them as outsiders

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    6/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.)

    Note that labeling theorists attempt to

    explain only what Lemert called "secondarydeviance

    Secondary deviance = the commission of

    crime after the first criminal act, with the

    acceptance of a criminal label

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    7/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) Secondary deviance begins with an initial

    criminal act, or what Lemert called

    "primary deviance"

    The causes of initial criminal acts are

    unspecified

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    8/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) If society, especially official agents of the

    state, reacts negatively to an initial criminal

    act, the offender will likely be stigmatized,or negatively labeled

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    9/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) It is possible, even likely, that an initial

    criminal act will not be reacted to at all, or

    that the offender will not accept orinternalize the negative label

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    10/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) However, if the negative label is

    successfully applied to the offender, the

    label may produce a self-fulfilling prophecyin which the offender's self-image is defined

    by the label

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    11/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) Secondary deviance is the prophecy

    fulfilled

    The crime prevention implication of

    labeling theory is simply not to label or to

    employ "radical nonintervention

    This might be accomplished by:

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    12/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) Decriminalization (the elimination of many

    behaviors from the scope of the criminal

    law)

    Diversion (removing offenders from

    involvement in the criminal justice process)

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    13/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) Greater due process protections (replacing

    discretion with the rule of law

    Deinstitutionalization (a policy of reducing

    jail and prison populations and

    construction)

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    14/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) Once a person is labeled and stereotyped as

    "criminal," he or she probably will be

    shunned by law-abiding society, havedifficulty finding a good job, lose some

    civil rights (if convicted of a felony), etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    15/24

    Interactionism and Labeling

    Theory (cont.) The criminal (and delinquent) label is

    conferred by all agencies of criminal

    justice-- police, courts, and corrections--aswell as the media, the schools, churches,

    and other social institutions

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    16/24

    Conflict Theory

    Deviance is caused by economic and political

    forces in society.

    Criminal law and the criminal justice system are

    viewed as vehicles for controlling the poormembers of society.

    The criminal justice system serves the rich and

    powerful. Deviance and Crime are defined in ways that meet

    the needs of those who control society.

    Unit 2 - 16

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    17/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    Crime is a function of the extent of conflict

    generated by stratification,hierarchicalrelationships, power differentials, or theability of some groups to dominate other

    groups in that society

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    18/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    Crime, in short, is caused by relative

    powerlessness

    Conflict theory has two principal crimeprevention implications:

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    19/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    On the one hand, dominant groups could

    cede some of their power to subordinate

    groups, making subordinate groups morepowerful and reducing conflict

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    20/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    Increasing equality in that way might be

    accomplished by redistributing wealth

    through a more progressive taxationscheme, for example

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    21/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    On the other hand, dominant group

    members could become more effective

    rulers and subordinate group membersbetter subjects

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    22/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    To do so, dominant groups would have to

    do a better job of convincing subordinate

    groups that the current inequitabledistribution of power in society is legitimate

    and in their mutual interests

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    23/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    Members of subordinate groups, in turn,

    must either believe it or resign themselves

    to their inferior status

  • 7/29/2019 Deviance theory.pptlknkn

    24/24

    Conflict Theory (cont.)

    Either way, dominant group members hope

    that over time subordinate group members

    will learn to follow those who dominatethem