2
Development of 30 InDel markers typing system and genetic analysis in five different Chinese populations Chengtao Li, Suhua Zhang, Zhenmin Zhao, Shumin Zhao * Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Justice, 1347 West Guangfu Road, Shanghai 200063, PR China 1. Introduction The interest in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is continuously increasing in the forensic field in recent years. The reason is that SNPs have a number of characteristics that make them very appropriate for forensic studies. First of all, they have very low mutation rates over short tandem repeats (STRs), which had been widely used in human identification and paternity analysis. Second, they are very suitable for analysis using high throughput technolo- gies and easy to automate. Thirdly, SNPs are better suited for the analysis of highly degraded DNA, since the distance between the primer binding sites can be designed to be very short [1,2]. It was well known that Insertion/Deletion (InDel) markers were an important class of molecular markers with the characteristic of high specificity than the classic biallelic SNPs and commonly be used for mapping heritable traits in animals and plants [3,4]. Here, we report a new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system for the simultaneous analysis of 30 InDel markers with significant informativeness and evaluate the potential utility of these markers for human identification in five different Chinese populations. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Populations and samples In this study, a total of 419 unrelated individuals were randomly selected from the five main populations in PR China, including Chinese Han (n = 108), Chinese Hui (n = 71), Uighur (n = 96), Mongolian (n = 58) and Tibetan (n = 86). All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Chelex-100 protocol. 2.2. PCR amplification and typing All 30 InDel markers were determined in a single multiplex PCR by multicolor fluorescence and capillary electrophoresis using the Qiagen Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen) at 1Â concentration, 0.1 mM of all primers and 0.5 ng genomic DNA in a 25-mL final reaction volume. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 30 cycles of 95 8C for 11 min, 94 8C for 30 s, 57 8C for 90 s, and 72 8C for 90 s; 60 8C for 60 min. The amplified products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on 3130 Genetic Analyzers according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocols using filter set G5 and POP4 polymer. The sample run data were analyzed using GeneMapper v4.0 software with the analysis method developed by the authors. 2.3. Statistical analysis Basic statistical computations including allele frequency, observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, power of discrimination (PD), power of exclusion (PE), probability of matching (Pm), polymorphism information content (PIC) and typical paternity index (PItypical) were performed with Power- Stats V12.xls. The x 2 -test for R Â C tables was employed to test the deviation of allele frequencies among different populations, and Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 4 (2013) e188–e189 A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 25 August 2013 Accepted 2 October 2013 Keywords: Insertion/deletion polymorphism (InDel) Forensic genetics Allele frequency Population genetics China A B S T R A C T Allele frequencies of 30 InDel markers previously selected and validated for forensic purpose were assessed in 419 unrelated individuals originating from five different populations of Chinese Han, Chinese Hui, Uighur, Mongolian and Tibetan in P.R. China. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests and linkage disequilibrium analysis were performed and the results showed that allele frequency distributions of the 30 InDel markers had meet the genetic equilibrium in all of the five populations and the InDel markers on same chromosome did not generate any linkage block. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that genetic variation among the 5 studied populations represent only 4.00% of the total genetic diversity. We observed the cumulative power of discrimination (CPD) for each studied population was 0.99999999999841 in Chinese Han population, 0.99999999999690 in Chinese Hui population, 0.99999999999709 in Uighur population, 0.99999999999772 in Mongolian population and 0.99999999999854 in Tibetan population. ß 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 021 52352959; fax: +86 021 52352959. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Zhao). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series jo ur n al ho mep ag e: www .elsevier .c om /lo cate/FSIG SS 1875-1768/$ see front matter ß 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.097

Development of 30 InDel markers typing system and genetic analysis in five different Chinese populations

  • Upload
    shumin

  • View
    216

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Development of 30 InDel markers typing system and genetic analysis in five different Chinese populations

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 4 (2013) e188–e189

Development of 30 InDel markers typing system and genetic analysisin five different Chinese populations

Chengtao Li, Suhua Zhang, Zhenmin Zhao, Shumin Zhao *

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Justice, 1347 West Guangfu Road, Shanghai 200063, PR China

A R T I C L E I N F O

Article history:

Received 25 August 2013

Accepted 2 October 2013

Keywords:

Insertion/deletion polymorphism (InDel)

Forensic genetics

Allele frequency

Population genetics

China

A B S T R A C T

Allele frequencies of 30 InDel markers previously selected and validated for forensic purpose were

assessed in 419 unrelated individuals originating from five different populations of Chinese Han, Chinese

Hui, Uighur, Mongolian and Tibetan in P.R. China. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests and linkage

disequilibrium analysis were performed and the results showed that allele frequency distributions of the

30 InDel markers had meet the genetic equilibrium in all of the five populations and the InDel markers on

same chromosome did not generate any linkage block. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA)

indicated that genetic variation among the 5 studied populations represent only 4.00% of the total

genetic diversity. We observed the cumulative power of discrimination (CPD) for each studied

population was 0.99999999999841 in Chinese Han population, 0.99999999999690 in Chinese Hui

population, 0.99999999999709 in Uighur population, 0.99999999999772 in Mongolian population and

0.99999999999854 in Tibetan population.

� 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series

jo ur n al ho mep ag e: www .e lsev ier . c om / lo cate /FSIG SS

1. Introduction

The interest in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) iscontinuously increasing in the forensic field in recent years. Thereason is that SNPs have a number of characteristics that make themvery appropriate for forensic studies. First of all, they have very lowmutation rates over short tandem repeats (STRs), which had beenwidely used in human identification and paternity analysis. Second,they are very suitable for analysis using high throughput technolo-gies and easy to automate. Thirdly, SNPs are better suited for theanalysis of highly degraded DNA, since the distance between theprimer binding sites can be designed to be very short [1,2]. It waswell known that Insertion/Deletion (InDel) markers were animportant class of molecular markers with the characteristic ofhigh specificity than the classic biallelic SNPs and commonly be usedfor mapping heritable traits in animals and plants [3,4]. Here, wereport a new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system forthe simultaneous analysis of 30 InDel markers with significantinformativeness and evaluate the potential utility of these markersfor human identification in five different Chinese populations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Populations and samples

In this study, a total of 419 unrelated individuals wererandomly selected from the five main populations in PR China,

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 021 52352959; fax: +86 021 52352959.

E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Zhao).

1875-1768/$ – see front matter � 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.097

including Chinese Han (n = 108), Chinese Hui (n = 71), Uighur(n = 96), Mongolian (n = 58) and Tibetan (n = 86). All persons gavetheir informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.Genomic DNA was extracted using the Chelex-100 protocol.

2.2. PCR amplification and typing

All 30 InDel markers were determined in a single multiplex PCRby multicolor fluorescence and capillary electrophoresis using theQiagen Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen) at 1� concentration, 0.1 mM ofall primers and 0.5 ng genomic DNA in a 25-mL final reactionvolume. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 30 cycles of95 8C for 11 min, 94 8C for 30 s, 57 8C for 90 s, and 72 8C for 90 s;60 8C for 60 min. The amplified products were separated bycapillary electrophoresis on 3130 Genetic Analyzers according tothe manufacturer’s recommended protocols using filter set G5 andPOP4 polymer. The sample run data were analyzed usingGeneMapper v4.0 software with the analysis method developedby the authors.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Basic statistical computations including allele frequency,observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, power ofdiscrimination (PD), power of exclusion (PE), probability ofmatching (Pm), polymorphism information content (PIC) andtypical paternity index (PItypical) were performed with Power-Stats V12.xls. The x2-test for R � C tables was employed to test thedeviation of allele frequencies among different populations, and

Page 2: Development of 30 InDel markers typing system and genetic analysis in five different Chinese populations

Table 1Details of the selected 30 InDel markers.

InDel rs# Allele1/Allele2 Chr SNP to Chr Chr Pos (genome build 37.1) Group label

1 rs2307963 –/TTAGCCCTTTCCCCCTTAAGGT 1 � 245551961:245551982 GRCh37

2 rs2308276 –/TTTAA 2 + 172915805:172915806 GRCh37

3 rs2307975 –/CTT 3 � 16427710:16427712 GRCh37

4 rs1611088 –/TAC 5 + 102432775:102432777 GRCh37

5 rs2307661 –/TTCT 5 � 34893909:34893910 GRCh37

6 rs1610949 –/ATA 5 � 96329011 GRCh37

7 rs1160953 –/TCTA 5 � 115626076:115626077 GRCh37

8 rs1610903 –/GGTGAGGGTGAGGGTATATGGGGAGT 5 � 11312823:11312824 GRCh37

9 rs2308116 –/GGA 6 � 11715435:11715437 GRCh37

10 rs2308139 –/TAA 6 � 152778334 GRCh37

11 rs16458 –/TTCC 7 + 122151327:122151328 GRCh37

12 rs2307783 –/CCCA 7 � 23307635:23307638 GRCh37

13 rs10666410 –/AGTG 8 + 61190688:61190689 GRCh37

14 rs34535242 –/GTAG 8 + 18429416 GRCh37

15 rs2307850 –/GGTG 9 � 135380186:135380189 GRCh37

16 rs16721 –/TTGC 11 + 32121863 GRCh37

17 rs35248926 –/TCTCT 11 + 117052070:117052074 GRCh37

18 rs35833136 –/AAATA 11 + 77997682:77997683 GRCh37

19 rs16660 –/TGG 12 + 120900933:120900934 GRCh37

20 rs2308232 –/AGTTTA 12 � 96991884:96991885 GRCh37

21 rs2307805 –/CCATAAACC 12 � 67705010:67705011 GRCh37

22 rs3049448 –/TCTGATCC 13 � 96127408:96127415 GRCh37

23 rs3032356 –/TTCCATC 14 + 32943593:32943594 GRCh37

24 rs2307537 –/AAG 14 + 77762948:77762949 GRCh37

25 rs1610878 –/ACAG 16 � 58763163:58763166 GRCh37

26 rs34999022 –/TAAAA 18 + 33050322:33050323 GRCh37

27 rs2307561 –/AGTGTT 18 + 24503507 GRCh37

28 rs2308278 –/TAAG 20 � 35315632 GRCh37

29 rs3034941 –/ATT 21 + 43182953:43182954 GRCh37

30 rs34543832 –/TCA 21 + 19706182:19706183 GRCh37

rs#: reference clustered SNPID; Chr: chromosome; Chr Pos: chromosome position.

The chromosome position of the selected 30 InDel markers was obtained from a provisional release of dbSNP build 132.

C. Li et al. / Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 4 (2013) e188–e189 e189

pairwise population comparisons were made with Fisher’ exacttest. Test size a was equal to 0.05, P value was corrected byBonferroni adjustment and P < 0.0125 (0.05/4, 4 = number ofcomparisons performed) was considered statistically significant inFisher’ exact test. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) tests for the30 InDel markers in the 5 populations studied and linkagedisequilibrium analysis among the Indel markers distributed onthe same chromosome were performed with SNPAnalyzer 2.0.Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of the 30 InDel markers inthe 5 populations was done with GenAlEx v6.3 software.

3. Results and discussion

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests demonstrated no significantdeviation from expected values (P > 0.0017, after Bonferronicorrection for multiple testing) for all 30 InDel markers in the 5populations studied. Detailed information of the 30 InDel markersis shown in Table 1. The results showed that there was nosignificant linkage disequilibrium among the InDels on the samechromosome in all 5 populations. Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) indicated that genetic variation among the 5 studiedpopulations represent only 4.00% of the total genetic diversity. Thecumulative power of discrimination (CPD) for each studiedpopulation was 0.99999999999841 in Chinese Han population,0.99999999999690 in Chinese Hui population, 0.99999999999709in Uighur population, 0.99999999999772 in Mongolian populationand 0.99999999999854 in Tibetan population.

Chinese Han is the largest population in P.R. China, accountingfor approximately 91% of the country’s total population. TheChinese Hui, Uighur, Mongolian and Tibetan populations areminority ethnic groups in P.R. China, and the total population ofeach is more than 5 million. Genetic data resulting from the typingof 419 unrelated individuals originating from the 5 populationsconfirmed the high information content of the selected InDelmarkers. The average observed heterozygosity value calculated for

the panel of 30 InDel markers in the populations studied is 0.476for Chinese Han, 0.476 for Chinese Hui, 0.461 for Uighur, 0.469 forMongolian, and 0.463 for Tibetan. This report of allele frequenciesof 30 new InDel markers would serve as a valuable referencedatabase for individual identification in the 5 studied Chinesepopulations in the future. This database may also be useful forother population genetics and diversity studies.

Role of funding

This study was supported by grants from the National KeyTechnology Research & Development Program of the Ministry ofScience and Technology of P.R. China (2012BAK16B01) and theNational Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (Nos. 81222041and 81172908).

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr Jinzhong Chen for reviewingthe manuscript.

References

[1] P. Gill, An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) forforensic purposes, Int. J. Legal Med. 114 (2001) 204–210.

[2] A. Amorim, L. Pereira, Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinshipinvestigation: a comparative analysis with STRs, Forensic Sci. Int. 150 (2005)17–21.

[3] J.L. Weber, D. David, J. Heil, et al., Human diallelic insertion/deletion polymor-phisms, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71 (2002) 854–862.

[4] J. Edelmann, S. Hering, C. Augustin, R. Szibor, et al., Indel polymorphisms—anadditional set of markers on the X-chromosome, Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl.Ser. 2 (2009) 510–512.