lbltrans

DeveloJment of Nonmotorized Transportation Facilities

Fiscal Year 2010-11

Report to the Califomia State Legislature

K=7aJ~~ Retired July 2010 altr 38 )ltAn sice

and oearly four dt~e9des IS bull btcyde commlter

Prepared Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8874 December 2011

Edmund G Bl()wn Jr Governor ofCalifornia

TraclStevens Acting Secrel3ry California Business Transportation and Housing Agency

Malwlm Dougherty Acting Director California DepartmentofTransportation

Tal)le of ltoutents

Contents Eucuti ve Surnmltlry 1iv

Background m ~ middotmiddotmiddot~middot ~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot I

Special Hvents and Projects - 2

Division ofLocal Asslstance(DLA) ~~middotbullmiddot middot - 3

District I (Dl) kmiddot~ middot middot middotbull-bull middotbullmiddot5

Dibulltrict 3 (03) 5

Complete Streets Steering Committee (CSSC) ~ ~ 0 Statewide Bicycling Task Force (SBTF) IO

Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities _ _ _ tO Major and Minor State Projects - ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ l0

Nonrnotorized Program Staffing ~ I

Callfomi~ Bike Commute (CBCI ~ 2

May is Bike Month middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullt ~ ~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot ~~-lt-lt middot middot -~~middotmiddotmiddot middot ~gt+~~middotmiddot middot _ bull bull ~~~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 2 Emigrant Trails Bike Trek (ETBT) ~ - 3 Cal ifomia Office ofTraffic Safety (OTS) Summit - 3 StraregicHighway Safety Plan (SHSP) 3

Nonmotorized Program Activities ~ ~ ~ _ ~middotmiddot middot middotmiddot middotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot 3

Department Districts 4 District Highlights 5

District 2 (02) 5

Disrtiltt4 (04) ~bull5 Dis~rict 5 (05) ~ 5 Disu-ict6 (D6) 6 Disuict 7 (07) 6 District 11 (011) 6

DistrictLocal Assistance0ffices 7 Division ofTraffic Operations (rraffic Operations) 7 Division ofDesign (DOD) 7 Division ofTranspo(lation Planning (DOTP) - ~ - 8 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lnli1lstructqre-Program bullbull~ ~ - - 9

CommitteesAdvisory Groops 9 Active Tran$portation and Livable Communities (ATLC) - - 9 California Bicycle Advisory Committee (CBAC) ~ _ 9 California Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CaPED)~ ~ _ 9

District l -shy - 10 District 4 ~-middotmiddot 10 District 5 12 District 7 ~H ~ bullbull bullbull bull bullbullbull bull bull bullbull bull ~--+middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 4 J2 Disuict 8 ~ ~ 12

Local Transportation Fund$ (LTF) 13 Special Ta~ting Authorities Local Sales Tax and Re venue Bond_ ~ - 13 Statewide Trans_pottatioo Improvement Program (STIP) ~ _ 13 Publ tc Transportation Account (PIA) - 13

u

Tal)le of ltoutents

Contents Eucuti ve Surnmltlry 1iv

Background m ~ middotmiddotmiddot~middot ~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot I

Special Hvents and Projects - 2

Division ofLocal Asslstance(DLA) ~~middotbullmiddot middot - 3

District I (Dl) kmiddot~ middot middot middotbull-bull middotbullmiddot5

Dibulltrict 3 (03) 5

Complete Streets Steering Committee (CSSC) ~ ~ 0 Statewide Bicycling Task Force (SBTF) IO

Funding for Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities _ _ _ tO Major and Minor State Projects - ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ l0

Nonrnotorized Program Staffing ~ I

Callfomi~ Bike Commute (CBCI ~ 2

May is Bike Month middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotbullt ~ ~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot ~~-lt-lt middot middot -~~middotmiddotmiddot middot ~gt+~~middotmiddot middot _ bull bull ~~~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 2 Emigrant Trails Bike Trek (ETBT) ~ - 3 Cal ifomia Office ofTraffic Safety (OTS) Summit - 3 StraregicHighway Safety Plan (SHSP) 3

Nonmotorized Program Activities ~ ~ ~ _ ~middotmiddot middot middotmiddot middotmiddot~middotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot-middotmiddotmiddotmiddot 3

Department Districts 4 District Highlights 5

District 2 (02) 5

Disrtiltt4 (04) ~bull5 Dis~rict 5 (05) ~ 5 Disu-ict6 (D6) 6 Disuict 7 (07) 6 District 11 (011) 6

DistrictLocal Assistance0ffices 7 Division ofTraffic Operations (rraffic Operations) 7 Division ofDesign (DOD) 7 Division ofTranspo(lation Planning (DOTP) - ~ - 8 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lnli1lstructqre-Program bullbull~ ~ - - 9

CommitteesAdvisory Groops 9 Active Tran$portation and Livable Communities (ATLC) - - 9 California Bicycle Advisory Committee (CBAC) ~ _ 9 California Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CaPED)~ ~ _ 9

District l -shy - 10 District 4 ~-middotmiddot 10 District 5 12 District 7 ~H ~ bullbull bullbull bull bullbullbull bull bull bullbull bull ~--+middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot 4 J2 Disuict 8 ~ ~ 12

Local Transportation Fund$ (LTF) 13 Special Ta~ting Authorities Local Sales Tax and Re venue Bond_ ~ - 13 Statewide Trans_pottatioo Improvement Program (STIP) ~ _ 13 Publ tc Transportation Account (PIA) - 13

u

Clt1111 Ail 1muportatilllbull fmprovnnent Act ot l iIO 13 Bicycle Trnnsponarinn AC0flllnr (BTA) _ _ ~ ~ 14

Bicyde Trnnsporation Acrotlnt l4 Stale Safe Rontes lo School Program SRIS SR2S) -- - ~ 14 E~viromnental E11hanceme11t and Mitigltticm (EeM) Fuod l5

tederaimiddotA id Funds - - _ J5

Safe Accountable FleXible Efficieot Transportation Equity Act A Legacy for Users SJ-FETEimiddotLU) middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot ~ ~~ middotmiddot~~~~ 1- middot middot middotmiddotmiddotmiddot ~-+~middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot~~~-~ Hmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot middotmiddotmiddot middot~middot- l5

Transportation Enhancement (TE) Activities Program [5 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Jmrrov~ment (CMAQ) Program l6

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 16 Federal Safe Routes to School (SRTSJ 16

Nonmotorited Transportation Pilot Program 16 High Priority Projects (HPP) 16 Forest Highways Program 17 Transporiiltion Community and System PresctVatiQn (TCSP) Program 17

Appendix I State Statutes ConcemingBicyoling and Walking ~ - - bull IS Streets and liiglways Code~ ~ IS Public Utilities Code - 19

Appendix m Bicycle Transportation Account Environmental Enhancemenl and Mitigation ~ederU and

Vehiclt~Code 19 Government Code - 20

Appendix lJ Nonmotorized Information Websites 21

Stale Safe Routes to School Approved Projects 22

Executive Summary

Pursuant to Section ampamp74 of the Streets and Highways Code thiaeport summaJie~ the California Department of Transportations (Caltrans) activities in nonmotorized tran~ponatiot The repo11 includes financial data for State federal and local funding program~ that focus on pedestrian and bicycle facilities

-CALTRANS DISTRICTS

AND DISTRICT OFFICES

iv

Executive Summary

Pursuant to Section ampamp74 of the Streets and Highways Code thiaeport summaJie~ the California Department of Transportations (Caltrans) activities in nonmotorized tran~ponatiot The repo11 includes financial data for State federal and local funding program~ that focus on pedestrian and bicycle facilities

-CALTRANS DISTRICTS

AND DISTRICT OFFICES

iv

Backgfound Strc~t~ and HiglWil)f$ Code SecGQtl S87A require~ tliltltL~

4Priot to Deeell)he31 of liPl )ear ~heDepartniCIIt 1aIJt~yme 1ucJ sulmiL lt111 filillllal replltt te the Lccislawre sumnmiizing ptlgJaili it hasttndertaken f6r d1e aevelopmenl of nonmoiOlized transpJ)rllion fadlitflts irrcludil1gmiddota summarylfmajotafld nunorprojampgtts The repo11 shull documenl a11 stateiundiilffor bicyOe programs i11dudtng funds from BTA Tbe Datgtpottatio1 ETannifg ~nlt Development Acountand 1heCiean Air Tfllllspltirta(iQnmiddotJmptQement 8ct Tile report shalfmiddotals_o SUtnmltYle thee(istinggtdilel(ve~ received byt)iemiddotDepai1ment from tle Federal BlghwaymiddotA(lministjatiiln (middotfItWAJ cottcetmng theavaillibtlity llffederal fuod~Jot thepregtams together with att eSfimate of the fisoul implctofthe federal panlclpatiltmill the programs

SetiiciO B87 oftfieStreet~middot andHigh~vays- Calk defines- nomm)taflZAd transpotraticill faoilifN ns afaciliry designed primaril y for theuse ofpedestrians bicyCiSis or equestriatts (t may hedesignedprimarily for one or mote of thoseuses

OalttJJl$ fQCUse~iw nattmotorized program efforts on projects that imprwe $afety and ~onveniencemiddot for nonnnitorized uavelt~cs C~ltrans supports fadlitfes thJt encouragebicycleami pedesjrian trave1 forutilit$rian trips Asprovided by S1aie statutes Caltrans may include nonmotorized facilities llSmiddotincidentalJlartS ofhighwaYCOPSiUction projects when an existing nOlUnototizeHacility will be severed middotordestroyed orWIen lh~ ndnmotoized project will inereasetliettaffic$afety otmiddotcapacitybullofthe highway The Strem ald Highways tode authorizeS Caltron$ to cOlliittuct illd~pendent nonmdtorized Itansportation facilities

IJaltrlllls HighwaJ DesignMan11allHDM) stales

Bicycle travercan beerhanoedby imprpvedmainfenanceand by upgrading existing r(l~~middot lSed regularly by middotbicydlst$ regmlless of vhether or11ot bikeways aredesignated 1hls effutt t6quites increased attention tomiddotmetight~liandpo1tiQn Qfroadway$ whete bicyclists are~pectedto-r~de On new oonstruction middotand majorteCQrtstrucenttiort projeets Jldequate width shcyuld be provided to permit shared use by OJCltorists and bicyclilts On resutfacing ptoJetltts~tle entilepmJl shoulder artd ttltlveletlway sluul beresurface-d when )dd~ Imes otturn rockets a mln1muml2msl19Uldershall I~ provided Wlien feasibl~ a w~deshoulderanowd be con$tdered When Jladnza mdwmiddotay tgtdgestripe $lfficienl toom putside thesuipe~houd be provided for bicyclists WheniXlnsidering tlle restnping of ro$dwaYlr fQC mlt~re tr~fficlanes tlie impactQtl bicycle ttavel should be ISiiessed Bicycle and pedesltian ttafficmiddotthrouglt con$1n1CtionzQneS sh0111d beaoelre)$ed ill the project developmentJioctss These effotis to pJserve or illfltove aMirtafor bbullcyclfsn to tide middotcart lJenefit motorists as well asbicyclists

Nonmtttorized Program Staffing The enrrent notunotorizetl program staff ncludlltlt

bull BQ Divi$ion of Loca1Ass1slll11oe (DLA) Bicycle Facilities Uni( (BFV o OneSenlot Than~portatlltlf PIM1ltt o OneA~gtsociateTransportation Planner

1 Dittridt 4 Ollkland Twamp SentorTr~ll$portatjonPlaruiers 1 brstrict 7 Los A11gel~~ OneSenior Transpottatioo Engin~r

I District nSan DiegQ One A$Sociate Transportation P lanner

bull HQ Div1~ ion ofDesigll On ScnlolTransportatim Engineer o HQ Di vi~ion ofTraffic Operations One Se11ior Transporalion Engiueer

Nine ctisricts not listed abuve have identified a staff member who serves a~ the norso1otorizcd contactin addition to fulfillitlg other district responsibilities

Special Events and Pro jects

California Bike Commute (CBC)

Theannual CBC promotion advocate~ increased bicycle use access safety and education Public and private agencies employers Scbools bicycle collilions and otlters support bicycle trllll8pottation in Californias communities to help reduce traffic congestion improve air qualily and promote healthy exercise Caltrans contributes $15000 to this event annually

May is Bike Month May is Bike Month is a Sacramento region event that promotes bicycling in conjunction with National Bike Month and the statewide CBC Tn recent years individuals employers bicycle clubs and teams in the Sacramento region have had a common goal to colloc1ively bicycle one million miles in the month of May A key promotional tool for the regional event is a usershyfriendly web site httnwwwmayisbikemonthcom where cyclists can log their miles and learn about the benefits of bicycling and local events In May 2011 CaltratlS employees logged 57654 miles-the most ofany major employer in the region Caltrans staff assisted in coordirtating and staffing special events associated with this promotion however Caltrans was not an official financial sponsor this year due to the continuing budget issues facing the State of California

2011

MILLION MILE CHALLENGE 2011

1393844 MILES

1------------------ 1393844 A 2010 ~--------------------- 1309039 2009 12amp7706

2008 ~------------------- 1242215 2007 ~--------------- 926638 2006 ~--------- 627593 2005 ~=------- 476164

In the Sacramento area 60 safety education clinics and more than SO community bicycling events were held These events enhanced the visibility of bicycling and contributed to the goal of the campaign Media coverage of this event has also increased M9re than 33 television and radio spots were broadcast as well as articles in IS local newspapers and news site~ Reported bicycling in the Sacramento region during the month ofMay has more than doubled from 476164rniles in 2005 to 1393844 miles in 20lL

2

Eiltigl~ntTraih BikeTre (RTBT)

BrcalllcmiddotCalifomia of Sacmmrnto-ampnignmtPr()lS i~ a nnnprofit agency that woramp~ fm[middotcJe)m JliJmiddot hellUiY lUllgt and a toracoo~tree future Since l98V ETB has been Breathe CJllifQrnTamiddot~ m~ior full(hi[5el Participmt~ m~ke il tlonation to ~uprontthe agppXys-orogfliOWand ]Gin [ljcyolht11 of 1arioJ~ J~er~ and atl army of volunteetbulls tot three t1ys M cycling 11nd t111o nigltsmiddot of c~mpng In 2006 Caitran~ lhert-Ditector WIU Kelllpton mitiarC( the forlliati(lraquo ofa Callrfuls tMtli foJ the ETBl TheCaltrans 1eam p~rtlcipatd in this frekdurmg ~006- 2010 Patlicipat1tm In 20~ 1was reduced howeller ~evcral Caltranll employees continued lhei11Suppott ef the ETBT

Cnlilobullbullnia OtiiceofTraflitSafety (OTS) Summit OTS oonducted the 20t 1 orrs leadetamphip liltd Trsimng-Seminarron Apxii2U-22 iU i in San Oiega1California The ltaintng seminaroffered toursesmiddoturgeting traffie bicycle nnd pedestrian safety profes~iomls The seminar indlullec a separate track fo1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Sllfciy StateWide pr9fes~1Qnalf a9ltlldernics l11w enforcement and cQmmunity aclvecates hid an qplGrtilni~)l to sham their wotk top)c~ tnclllded Acenttiv TransPlirfation Saf~tyTraining MetlodJ fot btJCl1ltlllntlngPedestrian and Bieycle ActiviYand EX-post~re ComtnRliaa~lon fol Pedestilao Safely Transportation P~licy is Healtlllolicy Safe Routes to SthooJ-EnfotQement and CQTimllmity Partneovsliip~ Data ami Tools for Planninamp and Enflfi~Ule~tt S~veral of these 5esectsions were)tands-Qn W9rcshops wllet-e partidpants wereabJe to corulultgtt actual pe4estfianand bJtycleCotmts exleriertce (fi ~sr ha11d) obstacles to safe walking and bicycling and galn VlllUible insightmto tlu~middot latest researchandbest practices to e~ure compliail~ wilhtheAmelicansbull with DittabiliHes Act ADA)~and optimize sllfetyfor communities TJUsmiddotworkshop was a partueling effortwhich included sey~ organizations such as California WALKS UniverMty ofCalifoniia Betkele~middotsSflfe Tmnst)cllfiiJI)l ReseamprcbandEclucatl9n Centet Cllifomia Dellr(rnent of Pub)ic HeallhPedSAFEPregriUn and HealthyT~an~pnrtation Network WALKSac(amlntOt Safe Rou~es To School Nati(walPartnership San Francis~o Departmet1t ofPublicampalth ecilifomla Highway Pittml (CHI) Federal Hfghway Administration and llle citY and county of San FrlJlclsqo Pedtllttian SaMy Advisc)Jy Col1IQi~

Strategiit Jtig1rw~ySafett Phur (SHSP)

Ciltrllll$ contitnte~ to lead theeftltm tG develop andmiddot i~plement lhe statewide California SHSI lmpl~mentatiQo qfover 192 a9tlons in 17 ~HSl challenge areas (Ci) is Ofgoingbull Twenty actions in the bicycling gtUld Walking challenge areas includilg CA I3 Itnptove Bicyding Safety and CA 8 Mtlke WalkiQg middotand StreetmiddotCrossinampSafet addressmiddot bjcentyeling and walldng safety spedfically Severallt1ther SHSP challengeareas also havethepotential to improve safety fot bicyclistamp and pedestlans Examples illclude CA S fmprove Driver Decisions abQulRigh~ ofWay md filml~g C87 ImprdveJmer$~ion~nd Int~ange Safety for Ro[ldWliY tl~ers CA 14 Etdtsnc~ Wtlik Zone Safe~y MdmiddotCA t7 ReauceDistraeted Driving

The SHSP impletnentatiOIT efflgtrt has led 10 tlljgt~rtt ~1~C-S in bioyolirtg and Walking fatalit~s Based on data from the fatal foccidetlc RepoJ1ing System bicyolilgfataliti~ in Califomia have dflre$1Sed from t 15 middotln 200$ to middot99 in 2009 a 14 percent decrease Peltieslrlan fatalities have deerelsed ftom 742 in ~005 to 56~ fu 2009 1124 percent ltecrease

Nonmotorized Program Activities Djvistou Qf Loltal Assistance(I)LA)

The BFU innLA Is th~ prmiddotimnrymiddotbtltnms contact for igtilaquo)cle1s~ues BFl) re$pQMibilides inolndelt

bull IYYanlgf11g Cellt~ns bicycle program

bull Admuu~terumiddotg lie 3lcycloo Tr~ttSJiortatuu Aoctbullun1 bull fa11icipaling 011stverll] (()Jmuiuees that focus 011 impmviug nownolOJJed tr3V~t ind LJdinl

~~~ch and data collectiCgtII bull Presenting informatiOII about Callraus JJonmoUJrized l)rogram aL gemmuts nd worlhops

hosterl by Caltrarts ~Tlli local agencies bull Preparing he Nunmotodzedlranspouauon Factliue~ Rt~pcut to the Cftlifomia Swe

Legislature (tegt~falw-c) bull Providing staff su~port to committee~ anti advisery groups fS~e ecuon ou

CotnmittoesAdvislttYGroups) bull Adminlstering Caltrans contributiot~S to special events bull Re~ponding to Catransl and local agency inquiries abtllt bicyd c facility design and

ope)ation bull Rcsponding to cotTc~pondenlleconcepiing tlonmotoiized travel reviewing proposed

legislation 8Sc~isttt1g with policy developntent and coordinating Caltrens participation in ruumal and special events

bull Providing tnput to the developmllllt or modification of numuqls such as the CA MJTCD HDM and the Project Development Procedures-Manual

bull Servingas co-le1d for SHSP CA 13~ Improv~ Bicyd ing Safety bull Asslstng the genellll ptlblic and conunllters wtth route planning bull As6istlng districts and othet departmentS in the-selecdon and funding orugtortuoities of jicyJ ~

racks lockers lllld pfber equlpnuml to Slpport bicycle commuting bull Advocadng and prolltoting noronotorized traVl ~middotaViable transportation mod~

Department Di$tlicllt As noted above here middotare fom full-tiroe nonmotorized programpo~Jtions in tluecClltlllns districts Coordinatots in the other nine dislrlcrs ar~typiltlally located 1n the district transportation planning-office ~d perform heir11onmotorlted program dtlties aspartoftheir responsibilifies Typical aetivities include

bull Supporting district bicycle and pedestrtan advisory rommittees bull Promoting bicycling witllin ClUqms and cAtemally in he community through sponsorShip

and participation in Bike to Wodc Mooth actiVities and bike sharing programs bull Revieing district projects for appropriate bicycling IDd walking provlsiont to enaure

compliance with Deputy Direcrive (DD) 64-Rl Complete Streers Integrating the Trregsportation Syzem both during planning and final projeer COOlltruction

bull Reviewingmiddotdistrictt1onmotorized projectss11Ch as parallel or grllde-separated bicyclepedestrian infrastructure

Ogtordinaling the review of pJcyclepedestrian infrastructUre 1mpmvernentsal6ng or aeros~ Stateright-ofwaymiddot(RiW) propQsed by locaUregion~ agencies

bull Pattlc1paling in various meetings concerning nomuotorizedtranspnrtntion t Participatirtg on varlous HQdistrlct teams bull A~sisting bicycle totuisfs and epmmuteJ with route planning bull Participating in special eventS such as tlallSporialion fairs and bicycling sarety tlirues bull Coordinatingresjlonses to local agencies bicycle advocates and the general public

concerning bicycling condihons and unprovemenli on State highways and in work zones bull Working with ltleal and regional agenciesbulltransit OJY6Tators and Caltrans sutff to irnplmteiit

bt~ytle improvemenl- bull Distti butlng information on funding opportunities uJd reviewing fuuding applications

tSSjamplllif locaJmiddotand fCg)Onlt1 agencies Wilh piOJel Caluati01JS fmrding pnoti(ieoltll)d Qlcycle trAiisportaLion plan development shy

bull Develop-itJgaud ~1pdating district bicycle I1111Pbullbull

Districtm~Migllts

Di~gtlri~ 1 (Dl)

bull PltJtticlpated in the 1middotcvicw ofNeverallllcyclepcentmiddot~striao projcxts- includiJW but nPt limited w t) llty t~fUkiah NorrhWtgtStem P~ciflcmiddot RailTrail Phase 1 2) eity of Poiut Arena realign intersectien and installmiddotsidewalks ou MEN-1 neat ~uJroois 3j Lake Gouoty cotJstruct curb gutter and sidewalk Mljr Bums Vall~y Elen~emarySchoo 4) ci~rof GleAtlakewldeo reconstruct restripe amladd-liike lanes on Dam Road 5) city ofFo~t BJagg instill croswalks ~urb-ramps bultgt-out$ sid~wltJks $1gp~ aM nllgtW bicydelpedestJian trails near several ampcllools 6 Lalte Co1mty cQnuct-$ldeW(l)k builJ-0Uts and closswaikjf aipngponiom of Hwy 20 hi ClMrlakeOaks_

Disbmiddotiet 2 (DZ)

Participated in the Mlly is Bike Month activitiesino1uding a lunchtime workshop which RCCVidtd M overview oflaws pertaining to bicycles commutins tips aud basic nmmtenance

DiAitrlc j Ugt3) o COropleted the D Bicycle G(lid~ Which prpvjdesmiddotiofoonation on facilities open or

clsedlo bieyctlsttns well a a Worm arion Ql topogtap)ly federal lands Stat~ Plr~s vista points eark anMide lots antl middotothet pljnrsbullof interest

o Cc~mpleted the LakeTahoe StateHghways Bicycle Plan

District 4 (IJ4) bull CQmiddotQfdinate4 and participated in qiJllrteily 04 BicycleAdvisorycCommiltee BAC)

meltting$ qonsisling ofrepresentltives ofBaymiddot Area transponatfanagendesmiddotaJtd ttd(ocacy g_rotps

bull Promoted and ~dVised on implementationbullof Caitmn~ Deputy Directive (IJD) 64-Rt (Complete Stretgtts- Integrating tbeTrtltlsportation System)(loordinated 04 BAC input Qngttllartg~s tomiddotthe HDM 1~gt illCorpQrate DD 64--Rl

bull Part1citgtaltd ill review~ ofdis~gtictplannilg project initiation and desig-Jl do~uments as well Iii on Calrims standards guideline lllldpmcedoteHS they jmpMtbicycle safe~y and travel and inCOJ]OrateComplete-Street$ tQIi~ts_

bull Re-~pdndea to exletnal reqllMtsfodnformationmiddotonroute planning roadway defi~ie~iciesneeded J)icyde $ltfety upgrades detours dwing oonstmction new policies ~n4 revisions Pertainingw-bicycle travel

bull Orgaruzed partidpation in 8Jke to Wotk Day and promoteci Callfans bikepJojec~ il otherpublic events

bull WodteJ wllhBayArea local agencies to ooordinate irtstallation ofbike facilities 011

04 Surtemiddothighways

Distriet S (05)

Provided input 10middotvarious lticyde plan effOrts 1ncJudingthe T-ransportation Agency for Monfureymiddot County and tltedtyof Alascadero

bull Partici~ateltl in blk-emiddotmonth attivitils inMny D5was recognizedf01 thesecond conse~ut~ve yelP for having tfte rughest pruticipatfonmiddotofemployees in the Bik-e tO

llt~rk Cltitilellgc m ~bullw Lu1s 6lu~po Cmu11y DS employe~ 11l~o utgmlilcd a thkeshym-Brealtl~~~ in ihe tity tf San Lws Ohispo 1o CllOOUtllgC tlic OOillnlllTJHy II hike to WOfk

bull tontrmred effm1s mpulllixll Wl update fo tl1e D5 bike map bull Continued cffo11ampto prornot~ all blke and pcdCilii at related grcutls h1cllkling the

Bicycle Trin~[Xlnllion Aecoont (BTA) Safe R11u~ to Scl~t~ol md Community Based Transportation Planning Grant (CBTP) For the CBTP grc~n a wor-kshop Wali

fieicl to ~hare the requirements of thegrant review best ptmiddotnctioes mtd pIltmde examples of grru1t applications

bull Provided input to plannmg efforts of theCalifornia Coast11l Tmill11 Sar Luis Obsp11 Ctuocy and he Big Sur commun1ty

bull Partiejpnted ln -a plannilg effun to gainmiddotpublic lnput Ot~ltlpropo$ed roaddfet em SR 22-5 which involves ijdding bicyekla1es 10 the facility Attended a town brill meeting and tity council meeting to gluge public opjnion DS is now m1he proce~smiddot of implementing tbis project

bull Participated with ~be Sanla Barbara Cotlncil ofAssociated GoverrunenS on creaiing guidlioes for a bike and pedestnan funding program from local Measlue A

bull Hosted trammg on bicy~e tTInSpor~ation and design pre1ented by be DOD Public gency pattners were invited to partkipllte

District 6 (D6)

bull Participated in the- f resnp County Bicycle ConlitionMall-to-Mall Ride This ~vent allows bicyclists to 3Rfely prQceed from theMiUlohesterM~l 10 downtown Fresnobull$ lul10nMall Approximately 191 commlmity leaders bu~iness middotawnW1i locally elected officiJs and bicycle enthusiljSts pwticipated

bull Participated with 1Blke Fresno a local bicycle advoca~y groupmiddotto challengeresidents of the Fresno areP to bicy~e a total ofope million miles during the month of Maymd tQ explore oonmqtQtiZed modes of trllilsportation

bull D6 Tefim Mobilit) won the Bike-to-WotkCorporate Challenge on May L9 as partof the May is Bike Month activities Thiamp wao~ the fout1h slroigbt year tltal 06 had more registered panicipants and rode mareJlileg than anymiddotother tGllln in that diV~ion

bull P~dpated In the Eyc-Q CaliforoaCJa~Sle Weekend May 21middot22 This evelll wa~

two full dAys ofbiking and runningfor all ages and abilit~es Astdion of State Route J6S was mciuded ao1 pan ofthe hicyciingraule and was closed to motor vehicle traffic during lhar time

District (D7)

bull Hosted a bike to work week eventen the office building plaza ACaltnmsbooth was provided to share information about oonunut~g to work by bicycle The Us Angeles CountyBicycle Coalition ~ntl L1$ AtlgeleS Coll11ty Metropolitan Transpor~ation Agency nholu1d booths in whicll they shared in(ormation aboul their org~tnizations and bike commuting

bull ffilsted a Bicycle as Ttansportltlon exhibit during MaygtUid June in the 07 Museum Space Someoflheltigbligltts were dhplays ofpoJtcc fire utility atid cargtJ bikes and Safe Bicycle Riding atid uaining videos There were also hi~torical pliotogrophs oflgtJc)cling in Los- Angeles rrt the turn of the century

Pistrict ll (Dlll bull Continued theiT rllditional Bike lo Work Day energizer stOp N~ly 170 bicyoliSL~

rude to tl1e D11 offlte D11 tool top honors in San Diego Association of

dovelilmmut CfirY~rate Challngeni (he $1tJarg~ Compa)l)l caregor~ lliis fs (lir fltsLiihle Disnicr J t ha~ 1aken this hpnor

bull Continued to work on the Compictc Slleet~ implementation Action Fhmand previded gltJdance anti Quke~dt for ~he eff0rt tfirouglwutfhro District

District Lqcat As~fst~nCJ Otlic~

Ihe Disllmiddott~t Locff Assistancemiddotoffices adtninistet vilrlou~ programs tlrat fund bieyde tmprovements such as BTA Transpjlrtation Enhancementgt Elwirenmental Etlhaneuro cmcnt and lgtilltiJation (EEyl~ Pcftlgtlm l1Ild Saf~ Routes tQ School

Division of Traffic Opetations (TrgtUfit O~~ration~

AmiddotSenkbullt TnmspCllfatren Engineer in tle-Office af lltaffie Safe(y Programs isthe pritnatyen civl~iQn CJIact Io~ hr~yclingand walkin~ issues Typical ~~tivitiesinclude

bull ManagingmiddotCaltrans pedestrian program bull Setving lt~S middotOOmiddotIead fo~ SHSP CA 8 Make Walking and Street CrJ)ssing Safet ~ Aolive invelvemem tn inplementingthenine actions id~otifled by the pedeslljun safety tearrt

and approved b~ the SHSP Steering Committee S1x ofthese -acti~as have riJW been compfeted Several new acioqsare uqqer ooosdertion

bull Assisting middotwith pevefopment ofC~ltra$ poiicies 11nd pmoedures For-exampU Traffic Operations iSlt rotidU(ting a middotseries o~ wor~siOps that will evaluate newmiddotnatiqnaf gtildance 911

(ignsstriping lind slgnaiS fonlonmotorized ttmsportation Sl)rue Ol all of tJis national WidanCe may lkincorporated intMhelA MUTCD

bull Releasing Calttans guidameentitl~ Complete fnte~sectitm~ A Guide to beconstruct(ng ImersecriOilSmiddotand InlerchangesJor Bkyamplist$ dlliJPedestriMs (Complete buersections Guid~)

bull Providing gener~l guidance bullQII sevet~lTe~earoh projects including a metholtlology for identifYing ad prioritizing pedestrian safety i~Ijprovement middotprpjet ls in~oworating nollDlotorlted woMnes ll)ldfnftastruoture inventory dat iiIO CallT~ns traffic satelY middotdatabase

bull Overseeing Caltrattf iIVGVement- in the SmiddotHSP by TrafficOperations Aamp noted ~hove two of the SHSPs 17 middotcenthallengemiddotareas addfess bicycling and walking $afety Severlilmiddotuther ch~lenge areas affect 1hese modes of lflvel Traffic Operations $tilff l~ assisting wltb the developllWJlt qfguidance rnateJials for acconunodating nortmotorized transporJltign io work woes

DMsion af Design (fit)[~)

A Sen~or Transport~ion Engineer In the Geometricent Des-ig~lStandards Unit in 001) is the Caittregs bicycle and pedestrian de$ign reviewel Typ~l activl1ies include

bull Draltingand revi~wlngCaltrans policie$ and gaidancethat affect bicyclist 9f plde$ttian sarety and mobility

bull Developiog- martagit~g ~d deliVering tJailitlg fot(Se on improving bi~yclist and pedesttian safew and mobility

bull Advi$lng HQ ru1d dlstrictstaffon the needs of ~icyclists andpidtstrims inStatehig)lwny pr6jects

bull Developing resellich proposals regarding blcyencliSt and n~estrlan safeWmiddotand mobility bull SetViig as the DODs liaison to variouscommittees and othercoflahorltltiveefrorts-llllit

addtess tionmototized travel surh as theCalifornia BicYcle Advisory Committee SHSP middotand California Pedestrian Advisory Committee

Llilision cf lrnnSjlOIIatilm rraoniP~ mOTlJ 111lt Oft1cc of Commumty Plnnning in DOTP ~ssists cotTJnmnhiebull witb nonmotorized travel through the ~~~lowing activit ie

bull Implemented a statewide Plauning Public Engagement Contract (Contract) This Contract provides specialized services and skills by engaging a conwltllnt to supp01t and enhance public input into the transportttion decision-making process The Contract bas supported the following nonmotorized public outreach efforts in FY 2010-11

1 District 3 (03) parmered with the consultant team tbe city of Winters and the community to develop a Complete Streets Concept Plan for Grant AvenueSR J28Russel Blvd in Winters TI1e project included concepts for making the conidor safer for pedestrian and bicyclist~ wbile maintaining mobility for vehicle travel and access to local businesses

2 D3 also partnered with the consultant team the city of Colusa and the community to develop a Complete Su-eets Concept Plan for a high truck and agricultural traffic rural corridor main stiCet- Market StSR 20 and 45

bull Providing staff suppon to Active Transportation and )ivable Communities (ATLC) advisory committee ATLC was established to recolllmend solutions and action items pertaining to nonmotorized concepS Sponsors include Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Local Government Commission California Bicycle Coalition Caltrans Bicycle Advisory Committee Bay Area Bicycle Coalition WALKSacramento and California Walks

bull Overseeing the Action Plan and the Complete Streets Technical Advisory Conunittee tbal provides support to Complete Streets Steering Committee (CSSC) DD-64-Rl was signed in October 2008 This revision strengthens the original DD-64 Accommodating Nonmotorized TransportaJion The policy assigns responsibilities for implementation throughout Caltrans The Office ofCommunity Planning completed the Complete Streets Implementation Action Plan (Action Plan) March 2010 which includes a decision-making strUcture for its executioo The decision-making body is the CSSC and consists ofDistrict Directors and HQ Division Chiefs That group aloog with the TAC met approximately si11 times over the fiscal year and mooitored progress on nwnerous high priority efforts such as guidance and manuals updates data improvements and enhanced training Key highlights included revisions to System Planning Guidelines Planning Sooping Wonnation and the HDM The Action Plan and related information can be viewed at httpwwwdotpagovlhqtppofficeslocpcomplere srreetshrml

bull Reviewing recommending for award and monitoring ongoing grants that address community-based transportation plaMing and environmental justice issues Thesegrants frequently have anonmotorized component and are increasingly focused on comprehensive planning or multi-modal mobility that includes pedestrian and bicycle considerations Through community and stakeholder engagement these grants attempt to resolve local conflicts and foster development ofsolutioos for short-term implementation that create more transportation choices as well as complementary land use changes Examples ofgrants completed in the 20I 0-1 l Fiscal Year include

bull Alpine Counry Bicycle Pedestrian Transportation Plan bull City ofBrea Brea Rails to Trails Plan bull South Fort Bragg Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Plan bull Community Driven Pedestrian Plan for the city of Richmond

5

bull City (lf Blttldwin llrk Communi ty-based Jbullfnn to Improve Cond~gtrs ami Neighborhood Connectio11S

bull Continued distribution outreach and presentations on the Smart Mobility Framework 10

integrate transportation and land use inmiddotplanning programs and projects throughout the state Performance measures suggested are specifically modified to consider nonmorodzed travel The document can be viewed at httponrampdotcagovhgtppofficesocplsmfhunl

bull Improved data tools and models The Office of Community Planning has initiated funded and is coordinating efforts to provide data and tools for assessing benefits and impacts of land use and transportation coordination Two eff01ts currently underway will help foster the implementation of nonmotorized transp01tation projects These efforts include Improved Tools for Local and Regional Integrated Land UsefTransportation Scenario Pla~ming in Cali(omia and Trip-Generation Rates Spreadsheet for Traffic Impact Analyses ofSmartshyGrowth Land Use Projects These and other tools can be found at hupwwwdotcagovhgtpgofficesocRprojectshtml

Americans witlt Disabilities Ad(ADA) Infrastructure Program

ADA Infrastructure Program in cooperation with the Office of Business and Economic Opportunity (OBEO) and FHW A is responsilgtle for ADA compliance pertaining to pedestrian facilities and features within the State RIW OBEO prevides a single focused management of pedestrian accessibility efforts to ensure compliance with ADA regulations related to pedestrian infrastructure owned and operated by Cal trans Funding fot ADA-only projects is provided in the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SliOPP) under ADA Curb Ramp (20l36l) and Pedestrian Infrastructure (201378) In addition a recent ADA lawsuit settlement reqllires Caltrans to provide $ll billion in access improvements to its pedestrian infrastructwe over a period ofthirty years Both ADA programs are considered mandates for funding priority within the SHOPP and are currently funded at a level of not tess than $25 million annually

Committees Advisory Groups Caltransstaff organizes andor attends several committees and altivisory groups that address nowuotorized travel including

Active Transportation and Livable Commuuities (ATLC)

ATLC is an advisory committee established to discuss and recommend solutions and action ite~r~s pertaining to active transportation (mobility altematives to the single occupant vehicle) and livable communjty concepts including stakeholder engagement multi-modal transportation compact growth and context sensitive solutions and to improve the relationships betwecentn key external stakehofders involved in active transportation and livable communities and Caltrans

CaJifornia Bicycle Advisory Committee (CBAC)

CBAC was formed by Caltrans in 1992 and is composed of thirteen members who represent various California agencies and organizations Thecommittee provides guidance to Caltrans on bicycle issues_ Meetings are held on the first Thunday of every other month starting with February BfUprovides staff support to the committee

California Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CalPED)

CaiPED is an advisory committee facilitated by the Califomia Department of Public Health to address pedestrian issues such as pedestrian safety reducing the number ofpedestrian injuries and fatalities statewide creating safe and accessible pedestrian facilities and improving healthy lifestyles through walkable communities and increased physical activity

9

ComtgtleteSlnets Stectmiddotinv Comlrlilite iltSSC) The esse OVCllecS ~~OUIlli1111 of the Com]9let- SIJee~~ Actiln Plun (Sec page I) oftlus rejlfllt

middotOversleing tbe Ac~ien Plao I tile Colll1Jiete Streets 1ed1mcal Advisory Ctmmittce~ for additional iHfonnatinn) middot

Statewide llicydiug TARJll-orce (SBTF)

In 1973 the Leg1~lature adopled ienate Concuuwt Resolution 47 wbicl establis)Ied a StaJewde Bikeway Committee lO nddiCSS (liOblerm related tltl the operation ofbtcycJes on publiegt~1reets and highways The Committee issued its leparl in ~br~ry 975 and its recommendatiOJls regurding lgticycle operations and equjpment became l11w mcmpotated UJ Oapler 1000 ofthe IIDM and P~rt 9 of theCA MUTCD

Jgticyclipg advocatf1 from the Califonnamiddot As~oclation of Skycling Orglllli~ations and Calfforni~ Bicycle CoQlitiPllcontated Senj)tOr CbtsJne Kehoe of Californ i~s ~9u Dislrittconceruiog implemeutMion efrecommendntionampjo tbe Commitlees repolt As a result the SBTfwas formed TI1eSBTP brings together appropriate ~enci~ an~ (lepartments to review cun~ bicycling laws bicycle facillties drsiiJl standards and Vehicle lOde enfbrcement jlJllctices

SpecifieccmCerti$ include reporting and data collection on the amount ofbicycling related to be typesof craShes llnd fatalities enforcemeJtt ofCalifornia Vehicle Codes for oper1tionof bicycles stllldardizing bicycling operation 1rainingfor childr6fl and 1Ulul18 and developing an effective pro~s for adopting bicycle filclllties consistently

SBTF has reviewed Califor~la Highway Patrol (CHP) truining forCHP officers and is- in the ptocess ofworldrtg with Peace Officer Standark and Training council to assesamp nnd potentially expand their offerings SB1T willaddress J~Willlil to provide additional training support for l9ltal uaffi enforcement agencies

Funding for Bisycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Mllo~ ud Mlno~ $1altgt Projl~ts

District 1

bull City of Ukialr Northwest~m Pacific Rail Tratl Phase l Deampign and con~tnlct a Oa~ 1 Bikewey

bull Ci(y of Point Arm~~ R~lignmterampection lntall sidewalks Oll State Highway l Mendochwbull near sChools

bull lJke Coutny Construct curb gutter an sidewalk neat Bums Valley Elemencary School bull City o[ Clearlake Reoonsbuct res1ripe and add bike lanes on Oant Road bull City of Fott Bragg lnstilll crosswalks curb rarups- bulb-outs sidewllk~ signs andnew

bicyc)e(pedestrian trails Milt various schoQIS bull Lake County Costtuct sidewalks 11utb6uts iD1d crosswalkltgt a~bullng portions of Highway 20

in Cle~~rlake Oaks

District4 bull Sun Pablo Avenue Streetscapc ThiS ptVjeer ~eeks to etthmce the oconomic vitality iltld

create a better walking environment along this OOlidor in the city at El Ceuito D4 CQtlaborated with the city in planniog and designing1hefollowing impCOIetnents along San Pablo AvenueSate Route 123~ new medians crosswalks COUlldown pedestrian signals and in-pavemem flaslting crosswalks in some locaioos comer curb extensions new street futnishings Including ampenches and bikerack~ addltio~ str~et trees upgraded transit ~tops with new benches and trashrecycllng bins demonstraiion rain gardens and public art

))

bull Mllni1 CutintrNillLer middotGItCk Road Biytk PccleHfifui 5tuay Tile ((IUiltY J~f Marin i~ conducting a phm ro llnprove lgticyltle and pedestrian lfCCii~ ltlong fvClller C1middoteek Road ttY regional hus-pads at the MtJin Street (Sln Quentin VillageL-580 exit The conntyhas pJovlded some altemat(vc CiUrru_~amp staff to review iilciOdillg middott rtJ~mdall0tlt middot~Jtermiddotllt~tive

bull Napa County Yo~lntviil~ MultibullUampePath The 1awt1 of l7ountviHe ~v-lt~rked ~vitlt DaltltuJs to ct~sign and laquoltmSltlcta IJicyde and pedesttlatl path paralletigSR 29 to COPlC~ deStiMilons intown

bull San Fraiiclsco Balboa Park Station Bitytle artd Pedeitdan Conpoctiotl Prolect This proj~cL ltd by the San FtgtancisGo lvlunicipal Ttansportation Agency strived to impiOvesafety fur bicyHsts middotand pede(ltrianl in the vicinity ofthe Balboa Par]gt Bay Area Rapid Transit Oist~ieuro1 St~tien Il4 coiiWJoratXI in the plaMingMitltisigo phawl liflhe pr~rect

bull Sao Mateo-County Meplo ark El Cammu EealPowntoWrt Spedfic Plan (Phase 1) Tle city is qeYeoping I long -tettn pian for the areas $1lllOUndlogEl C~gt~nino Real ant ~antaCttil Aweniie Theprojectseelt IQ il(bulltJIltiVe iVlttlkln~ llltd tilllting thruugh enh1111cingeast-west oonnectivity especially across El -C1uninoRel with srdewalkeJcteusimiddotous bicycleruuL pedestrian connections and other improvements Galtr-ns 4Vctrkeltl with 11e city of M~omiddot riltk middota$ they were middotdevelo_ping tJimiddote~pecifif plan IQ enslle 1he future of El ISrmino ltea1as a cornpl~tesucentt hat jncludes bicyclefacititeS

bull Phase II Sat~Mareo County Midcoast HighWlY 1 Safety~dMpbility Improvement Study Ftmded by a CaltllUls Conmmnity-based lirJillSportatiGnPliUUlirtg GrantSan Mateo County mlpound1 the Localmiddot Government Commisampio11aie conducting a participatory plannin eff01t fu imptoveHighway 1 safety and mopility b~tw~ HalfM1011 B~y Airpcnt and DevilampSlide TJe 1igbway pll$Se$ roastal ooniiDunities with liighpedesttian and bjc~cle activity al)d cames significant ccmltl1ut~tmiddotand tolrlst lcentfic volumes The project will also hiJp a1111re~ts fue typeof pedesrtianfbicycentlecro$Sing the LOinmUJdty etWi~ions where a future path Wfll middotcross Highway I just south oDe-ltllS Slide

bull San Mateo CpurttyrrlltlsitDistrict (SamTrans) OePartment ofnan4poltAtion (DOT) Nltltional Tnfra~trutrure hweatment (TJGER II) planrung-grant ~S~Ttat)~was awarded $1reg7240 for the Grand Boulevards middotJtemoving Bruriers to Sustainllhle Co111munities Project which is funded by a OOT 11GER Ifplanning grant and local sttpPort Theproject grantee is using the lWard fur Complete StreetS Design Case Studies that will facilitate the design ()f demonstratiop prgjectsQn El Camino Real to integrate the rolllwaywith sustallabledevelopnl~ eneowage pedestrian and traJISit actiVity lttnlpronligtte investor centnfidence middot

bull S anta Clara Co)lllty Steven~ Creeit Boulevard The objective~ ofthis proje~t includ~ improving traffic flow1 enhancing pedestrian features atongS(evens QteekBoulevatd separating regional ~way~to-freeway trlttffk fr~m local traffic and teducing queuirtg and trafficbarikqps onto norilibound 1-Z~Q~frltim l-8811-and Stevens Creek bullfloulevatd mSanJo~e Tnere Qa9 15een signficint resiliential and commercial growth in th-e ttoJect aJel Also high -volumes opoundtn~fficmalgtcent itdifficult flr p~entrians ~o bulltros~ the freewayTII)ips espePally middotsince there are no traffic signals W controlthe flov~ of rraffic D4has workld with the other members oflhe prQjeet teamto inoopPrate 6middotquared up intersectiOQamp foslowturning velricles and short~ pedestrian ao~-singdlStlinceSO llndfieewayon-ramp designs middot(hlt alow middotpwestrians to middotcross only one anebullQftraffic Petbre J~achmg il refu~e

l l

bull Solana e tHmly We~1 TCXIiS ~-meet Theci~y ofFirlieldis ptQjli~SiJ1g imemvea CO(IIlQIgtiegtTV

ro1he c~islingTnm~i1 CcJ~teJmiddot by molifylllg rhe US J0 I Ellst1flund liffmiddotllIPWest Texas interPt1o1 and adllh1g lt~ huRmiddotMIY ramp f11Jm th~ off-mmJ dlrcct]y into the Jlmit Ceoter Gal(Jllnsli11$lteen coordilh)ting With thf lti(y Oil aesgn elernentsmiddottt) improve l~edestll~n and llkycle acces

bull Sonmiddotom11 Ooonty Citnt~ Fair Dtive Thiamp projectmiddotby the city ofClovetdak seekS to provide an improved eounectiOI) for pedestdans and bjcyclisfsbullmn Citrus FJJil Dive to tie fllture Sonorfl Mari11 Area Rail bulltransit (SMART) Station m Cloverdale IJlie project crosses Underoeath US IQI and will i flC(udelt1 scpar11te bicycle-J)d pedeMrian J~ltitb w)tf) improved conntctions ttl t~ downtoWI middotWcentbull and fumfe trainstatiot~ D4 has 15eencoordinathig bullwitll city mptesentattvrs on proposed lmprovements

bull Stat Route l 6Mimbei Road Roundabout ih~county of Sonoma proposes to modily Ole intersectiottmiddotof SR J l6and Mirabel Rraad bylluHding a roundabout This wU allow the oounty ro go fonlaro with the-116 bypass m Forestv~ll~by pmvidilr~ I CQnnecton souOl ot the exinting fmiddotinterseWon A tollnclaOilut desfgn 1s being COtl$idered to Improve Sltfety for bicyltJi~ts and pedestQ~IIS D4has been t oordinatirtg with the county on this pr~ecl

bull the new eas1 spnn ()f the San Fraueisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) currentlymiddot under CQitstructioo will feature aseparated bicycle and pede~tillll fmility between Qaklatttl Yerb11 Buena and Tr~sl)fe Island~ AlicycJe~1-Jut~le on lhe -w~stern middotspan will likely tre continue~

bull A Praject lnitiation Document (PID) WllS prepareq togtdevelop alternatives fonseparated bicycle and redes~fatl fa~ilitymiddot on the edstlng NeSt SPi11 of the SFOBB ~~tweenYerb~J Btrena anclreastlre Islands and San FranciScO

bull A PIP WlttS~area for a bicyclepedestriahmalnteJ~~ pal)onthe wrst span ot the SFOBB Thfgt project wnu1d close the -remainixl~amp11P for norunomo~ ~ave between Yerha Buena artd Treasure [stands middotandSan Francisco

bull BikewaymiddotcQ)Uiecttl1ns lle being constnlcted to link the bikelped path on tMmiddoteastspan rlfth~ SFQBB middotWith Shellmound St~t in Emeryville and Maritime Street in We$t Oakland IZlOIStJUctiQn cJmpleiJOii isscbeltuled tO correspond middotVitb tlieopening oil tlie SFOBB east spllll in20J3

DistFict S bull ln~talled u Dtke box (advanced ~top line) on State Route227 and launched an outreacli

oamplllgn tD inform tile public onbull the 11se ofbikebo~es DS is nowmiddotengjlged in a yea~--longshy~tudy of the effectfvtn~li pf the bike box-

Pisttbullict7

bull Thousanc Oaks Lynn Road and Olsen Road bike lanes Lyun Road and its nottlrem routiim11tion Olsen Road) fopn IJlirnpo~tmiddotUld popullir route b~weenSimi Valley ruid Newbury Parilt )he2i-rnileltScentgment betwW Wesi Hillctest Driv-e and Aveniila de Los ArQoli$middot is tli~onl~ pnrtof Lyrgtn R-ltiad lacking a blkelane BliA fUnds will fund in1piovements tliat wllltesult in adesignated bike hme that 1ndir~Uy will bave a dhmpening effecu on speedit)g motods~S Some sidewalks will also be widened

Disuict8

bull Pirticipated in major impmvemtmt projects sucb as the o)lgoing l-2JSmiddot widenin~ lhrough the city of San Bernardino and other Uterehang roconstruction pto)cts inaludin_g several in theshy

ll

Co~chcUa Valley 011 t- l fl t)lilb m tbc city ofR-iaho 1m overcrossu~ptmiddotojeet on 1- 10 in Fontana imerchan~es r fhemiddot cities of PeJiis and Murrieta on r~2 1 5 aTJd SR-91 in the city of RiVCJsi~k The~eprojctIS were all xeyi(wcd to m~ure thlli I)Je tlcedamp of e11isting ~nd 11 tl~tre pede$lriuns and ~icyt)t~t~ wril tQnsiltlcentred

Lo~lTrauportatlon Funds (LTF)

TheTianspcentttation Development Act of 197 l pr(lvtdes 1ha(11 fbull)rtion of the saes tax coteted i1r eltich colln~y lle returlltd tt htCal ellitlfSbulliilr public transportation purpose$ Ewll county has L TF with revenues genorared from 25 per~entofthe sales tal collected in tbat county_ fn Fiscal Year 2008-09 the latest y~r information ill available total LTF expenditures fur bicycle and pedestrian gtojects weJe $259 million bull

SpecialTa(iQg ~thorities Loeal Sales Tllx and llev~ueBond

In addition to thestatewide 25 penent ljk-al sale-s taX- fot llmSpOrtation oounttes n11Ve1the opfton of levying 4Il additional iocal sales taxuponbulllpproval h)middot two-thirds of the voters for oowny t ranampporWion tJses Cumml(y 19 001lilties imposemiddot a looal Qptloll -~al~ tax fot traPspolation Jn FY2008-2009 the latest yell inforrtmtion is tvllable $15 l mlllion in local ~nies ta11es lnc related revenue lIQnds wereexpended for bicycle anltl pe~SfiltU projects

Statewidebull lroospor~tioo1ft1provement PrQgr~tn (811P) 1e ~QlQSTIF intll(lcent5 appt9Ximate)y $20 mllliQn froJll JiY 2010-20l1 tlrough EY 2014-~015 for pmjet ts that aremiddot limited toorlmtlude bicyclelJld pedestri11n f4cilltit1S Typical STIP norunotorized projects include on-str~t and off-street bikeways tidewalld mprovements and impmved access to transit

PuhJij Tlllnsportation AccountPTA)

PTA fonnerly the Transportation Platming and Development AcltOllnli wasmiddot estil)lisled by the Tr~n~portation Development Account to promote tlie development of the public trregspQrtation 1il(r~siructWe lgty fundingmiddot local and suue bus and rail projcentcentts PTAis no Qnger a viWle fpQ~ source Jn the $TJP for nonmotorized ttmsplgtltat1QnprQjeo$ On~ $25 million in hudget Japaclty through theSTIP i~ avaJllbJdorlTA in 20ll- l2 No ftmds are-availabk in subsequent years AB 105 recenacted the fuel tax swap and also implemented a new salegt tax OJlmiddotdiesel lnstead of ~qtiiring the transfer ofproceeds from tile- JICW sallll t~ltIn diesel w ~fTA AB 105 middotwill ~t tbeJeveniles for deposit in the State 1ransportation Accolnt T)le PTA tmly retains about 25 perpent ofme ~ot11l revenuesmiddot from lhe- scales taX ondiesel

Cleat~ Airhatl~pot-latioo lmprovement Act of 1990 in 1990 Califomia vot~rs approved Proposition 1l6 the Cleaii Air and 1lranspmtation hnprovemerit Actof1990 This meastlre authorized issuiUIce of$199 billion ln general obligation bonds forbicycletail and rruss tnnsportaiion purposes Twenty million dollltUS were atinate( tQ fUlld a Pfogtam o(~ompeti~ve grants to llltal agencies forcapital outlayfor bicycle intNovement pf(gtj~ts l he prog~il(ll also lnclllded a reservation of aPproximate1y $73 million for 27 S(ecifiednonlirban rounties The lnon-urban1component offheJJQgtatn funded approximately~30lltlill~on iltbicycle and pedestrian improvements The program is es~entitUy compleed

bullr TrtJIflrirlarion Piallnill8 ~$q11Git~ Anmwl (tltpPn PY 1008itlQI~ 1h~Mobullrltitmrlt l~bllcgttltonVililablt 11

UicJbullcle Tran~potbulltntlon Accmmt (lHAJ BTA provides state funding for city nnd county projects that imllrDVlt~safety llnd convenience for hlCyctc~ commutcrr inchbullding bnt not limited to

bull New bikeways serving major llllnspmtaiion corridors bull New bikeways removing travel barrier lo potential bicycle conunulers bull Secore hicycle parking at employment centers park-and-ride lots rail and transit terminalll

and ferry docks and landings bull Bicycle-canmiddotying facilities on public transit vehicles bull Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety and efficiency of bicycle travel bull Elimination ofhazardous conditions on existing bikeways bull Planning safety and education bull Improvement 1111d maintenance of bikeways

Caltrans convenes a committee of representatives from Caltrans othet State agencies local government representatives and bicycle advocacy organizations to evaluate applications and reconunend projects for fWlding TheFT20ll-2012 BTA project Ust is included in this repo1t The table below provides fWlding infortnation on amounts allocated encumbered and expended for active BTA pwjects through JW1e 2011

BFU staff provided a link to the BTA Project Status Report on the BTA webpage The report allows local agencies and the public to view amounts allocated and expended on each BT A award The list can be sorted by many categories including lecal agency award year and lapse date and can be viewed at the following website httpwwwdotcagovhgLocaPtogramsbtabtawebPaeehtm

Bicycle Transporation Acrouut Active Projects by Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year

Projects Awarded

AJocated and Encumbered

Expendedbull (Jnne2011)

2011-12 24 $7200000 $0 2010-11 23 $7200000 $4126 2009-10 23 $720QOOO $926358 2008-09 18 $7200000 $3594130 2007-08 21 $7200000 $4048031 2006-07 27 $9190000 $4261522 2005-06 33 $7190()00 $4020116 2004-05 27 $7190000 $4310167 2003-04 35 $7190000 $6227651 --PtDrto 20Hlmiddotll Soc81 sgcocirsshy wm clfowed ~ 10 amp~oramp towrr-ltie projcds initially 3 ~ complete -tid bullct addltQt)al S wilh a ooopentM wort agoememiddottlt if~-~omiddotoompldt projocts B~Jon~Uoge ~~as ken ~Ye-d hit cfl~9 ~r-middotcob)tftton tiiM to 6 tllt$ beglt~fllngwicD 20a~2011

State Safe Routes to School Program SRTS SR2S) Cal trans administers State (SR2S) and federal (SRTS) Safe Routes to School fWlding The passage of Assembly Bill (AB) 1475 in 1999 created SR2S as a two-year demonstration with funding of $20 million per y~ar for projects that improve safety on routes to school fu 2001 SB

l 4

10 ~tended the program three year ro January J 2005 In 004 Senate Bili (SB) lOS7 extended the program until Jmuary l 2008 ln 2007 AB 57 extended the program ipdefinitely

Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) Fnnd

In 1989 AB 471 requi(ed the Legislature to allocate$10 million atmually for ren years for projects that offset environmental impacts of public transporcation facilities This program became known as the EEM program The EEM program consists of four categories of projects One of 11ose categories Roadside Recreation can be used for the acquisition andor development of roadside recreational opp01tunities and include parks and greenvays roadside rests scenic overlooks trail~ and railheads parks and snow-parks In 1999 SB 117 eliminated the tim year sunset provision to allow the program to continue

Projects reque$ting EEM funds must be directly or indlre~-tly related to the envirorunental impact o( modifying existing or constructing new transportation facilities The California Natural Resources Agency reconuuends projects for approval by the California Transportation Commission lnFY 2010-2011 $tO million was available for the EEM program TheFY 2010shy20It EEM project list is included in this report

Federai~Aid Funds Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Actt A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)

Several categories of federal transportation funding may be expended for bicycle and pedestrian projects This section summarizes the federal funding sources available for nonmotorized transportation projects and estimates the fiscal impact of these sources

Transportation Enhancement (TE) Activities Program

Ten percent ofeach states SUiface Transportation Program (STP) must be set aside for TE activities Three of the 12 defmed TE categories are bicycle and pedestrian related

1 Provision offacilities for bicyclists and pedesttians 2 Provision ofsafety and educational activities for middotpedestrians 3 Bicyclists and preservation of abandoned railway corridors

These funds may be used for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian transportation facilities or non construction projects such as training brochures and route maps related to safe bicycling and walking California is receiving $166 million in 2010 STIP TE for programming in the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 funding years The FHW A and the National Transportation Enhancements Clearinghouse provide various reports on individual TE obligationsmiddot Since 1992 California has obligated more than $866 million ofTE funds Of that amount obligations for bicycle and pedestrian-related projects are as follows

bull Pedestrian and bicycle facilities- $38t millionbull bull Pedestrian and bicycle safety and education - $89 million bull Rails to Trails - $93 million

FHWA -~ httpllwwwfhwadowovllfvilOnilalaPP ob summhm and Nallonal TIWlsportatioo Entlanoements ClearinghoIS$ wOOs~ fltloifwiNJ$nOlmen(SobullWSaJepOflle3stgtbull

15

10 ~tended the program three year ro January J 2005 In 004 Senate Bili (SB) lOS7 extended the program until Jmuary l 2008 ln 2007 AB 57 extended the program ipdefinitely

Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) Fnnd

In 1989 AB 471 requi(ed the Legislature to allocate$10 million atmually for ren years for projects that offset environmental impacts of public transporcation facilities This program became known as the EEM program The EEM program consists of four categories of projects One of 11ose categories Roadside Recreation can be used for the acquisition andor development of roadside recreational opp01tunities and include parks and greenvays roadside rests scenic overlooks trail~ and railheads parks and snow-parks In 1999 SB 117 eliminated the tim year sunset provision to allow the program to continue

Projects reque$ting EEM funds must be directly or indlre~-tly related to the envirorunental impact o( modifying existing or constructing new transportation facilities The California Natural Resources Agency reconuuends projects for approval by the California Transportation Commission lnFY 2010-2011 $tO million was available for the EEM program TheFY 2010shy20It EEM project list is included in this report

Federai~Aid Funds Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Actt A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)

Several categories of federal transportation funding may be expended for bicycle and pedestrian projects This section summarizes the federal funding sources available for nonmotorized transportation projects and estimates the fiscal impact of these sources

Transportation Enhancement (TE) Activities Program

Ten percent ofeach states SUiface Transportation Program (STP) must be set aside for TE activities Three of the 12 defmed TE categories are bicycle and pedestrian related

1 Provision offacilities for bicyclists and pedesttians 2 Provision ofsafety and educational activities for middotpedestrians 3 Bicyclists and preservation of abandoned railway corridors

These funds may be used for the construction of bicycle and pedestrian transportation facilities or non construction projects such as training brochures and route maps related to safe bicycling and walking California is receiving $166 million in 2010 STIP TE for programming in the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 funding years The FHW A and the National Transportation Enhancements Clearinghouse provide various reports on individual TE obligationsmiddot Since 1992 California has obligated more than $866 million ofTE funds Of that amount obligations for bicycle and pedestrian-related projects are as follows

bull Pedestrian and bicycle facilities- $38t millionbull bull Pedestrian and bicycle safety and education - $89 million bull Rails to Trails - $93 million

FHWA -~ httpllwwwfhwadowovllfvilOnilalaPP ob summhm and Nallonal TIWlsportatioo Entlanoements ClearinghoIS$ wOOs~ fltloifwiNJ$nOlmen(SobullWSaJepOflle3stgtbull

15

~ongesiion Mltigatmt mul Air Quutity Jnlprovcntejt l tCMA Q) ProB~rn The CMAQ Prbullogrtm w~s ctcated by tile lntennodal Surface trarlNpormiddottntOJl Efficilncy nrt of 1991 ilnd reauthonted by the Jran~porhiliorgt EfJcienly Act for llie 2l5t CcttllltY in 998 und SAFEfBA-UJ in 200S The CMAQ frogrum fwfltb pr~ieets that redooe umiddotarlportntion related emiS$iM~ to help achieve and maintain national ambient area au qu~ li1y st andard~ ill uonatlllinrneol arid maintenance ~relt~~ few oone carbon monollide and particulate nwiter

CMAQ tilnEis may be used ft~r COImucting bicyclemiddotand pedestrian projects sudt a$ trail walkways or storage facilities or ooncQnstnrction projectc surh a~ marketmg dforts de~iged to clcourage bike riding and walldnamp and ecfucltign anltil)utreloh progrums i11tended to inetease pulllie linoWlt1dge about tit~ bcentMfifS ofbild11g w wplking In Fi~cel ~ear (FY) 20fl9-20 IObull bullt-21~ mlHiollrl CMAQ fimds were vbligatld rot 9tf)icyclemiddotand petlesbmiddotian projects

Fedcrll Safe ~outes to School (SRTS)

Section 1404 ofSAFETEA-LU CJelt~ted the federal SRTS Program lo 2005 The funds are available for inrrastmcture and nonmiddotinfrastructule projects that ileyrove facilitie$ and encourage elementary and D1iddle school Sllldents to walk and bicycle to school To date the Progrnn has awarded 2 (1 projects totaling $9J million The 3d cycle list for federal FJ6CGI Year (fFY) 2010-ll to fFY 2012middot13 will include appmximately $42 million lor Improving safe r~uteS to scllool

ijghw~y$afety Jmprovaoent Program IHSIP) In 2005 SAFEfEAgt-LU established a new HSIP fur reducmg traffiC fatalines and serio11s injuries on public toads This funding IS split equally between statehighways atld local roadwjys The JirstfoufHSIPcycles funded 547 local tQIl(lwayproject~ from a totoJ of$218 million in funds ln FFis 2Q06 tlirough 201 t fhe 5th ijSIP cycle is pMned for llle Z012 PPY Uld will include apprOJtimltely $50 rniliOn for iln(m11bulllng sllfetl on Joeai roadways

Noom~Jtorized TtaILpobullmiddottatloo Pilot Progrnm

SAFETCAbullLU cretred Lite Norunotorized TlianSpOrtatlon Pilot Program to demonstrate the extent to which bicycling and walking can shift and replace vehicular traffic The PJogram provides S2S million fronnhc Highwny Trust Fund during FY 2006 through 2009 ro the countyofvfarin and three other communities ColumbiaMi~ouri MnmeapolisSaint Paul Minb~a and Sheboygan County Wisconsin The fwhis are to be1lsed to construct a netwolk of nonmotorized tranS[lQrtiltion infrastructure facilities including sidewalks bicycle lanes and pedestrian wd bicyele trails- thai coru1ect directly with transit stations schools residences businesses recrention areas and ofuer community activity c~tets Funds are al$omiddotuvailablefor $eating the public The selected cmrununities will also assess tlle effcentcenttiveness of these investments ill decreasingcongestion and energy u~agc improYing safety increasing bicycling and walking and promotiflg better health lllld a cleruer environment

The project in Marin County is the Cal Park Pathway and Tunnel ClOd will become- o11c ifthe felbull rails-w ith-tt~ils projects In llie counlry consistingofa paved multiuse pathwaymiddotand interurban tall service It will be a vital link in Marins overall bicycle and pedesiJian network a nlt a key cormection in the24-mile NorthmiddotSoulh Greenway providing a direct (eve route through a 250-fQot htgb ridge ~tween Larks plu and San Rafael

High Priority Projects (UPJgt) There are currently 49 HPP earmarks authorized by various public laws tbathave funds available focpedesp-ian andor bicycle improvements alongCalifomlamiddots rQads These funds ae authorized by Congress and are available Untlt expended QC r~cinded in foderallaw

16

libullrest Highways Progr~111

ll1 California the F11re~t -frghway~ Program provids fundinsect lo re~ulfMe1 tcitlillel ICltubililatlt o~rltrcon~trqct public ro11as llwt PJO~de ~~ss ro OHtCe witHin a nutklllal fbw~t The Ptogram is ~dminliitCled by the FHWA s Pqi1oilll Lands Highway OJTi~c ill pafnetmiddotsiipmiddotYith the US DtWaJUnent of Agricuhure Fllttsl Service and Caltran~ Pmje(Jf eHglbility is ha~middoted em cliteria identified from land use planning 11nd impacts flom tr~nsportatinn facilities fpplieation scoJing includes potnL~ for improving safety for bicycling and w~Jking

Tlmiddotanspmbulltaticlll Community a lUI System Pl)Sefilltlon (TCSP) Progrum

The fCS~ Ptogram proviiJesfundamp to stat~ nletropnlltan planning organizations and loeal nncl ilibalbullgoverrmenf8 fat ptojects ta iocegrau ~ranspqnauon community alld system plescrviltion Eligible proj~fs includetransit-oriented developnrent p11lns and traffic calming measure~ in addition tp prqJe-ramp that reducetheimpacts of trlDipottatioJI Till ilie environmeul Eadl tate must pr6videal1Jnilillg mlltl)h

II

ppclt~tdxl ~1 1ll ~tat~ AlliCpoundfut1Jg ll k~llUI ttflll Waikltu

~~~~s md Hi~wa~ lt~J~k

ScctiOfl t876

Section888

Section88S2

Section 8884

Tlie DeparlmeJl( ltay aequitl rt)a) property lor rhecon~truction anltI tMmiddotinterianc~of ntigtJPQtoii~ea UArt$JI)ffalon fl9illties

Tllete is a llicyckfaciliticsc001ditllltot Ill the Department Who i~shybulltespousible fur (be middotadmini~trarton of bkycle-J11)ated activities ot the Qepanment

The-Depanme11r shall publis~1 a middotstatewide m~p lltistrating amprare liighway lQUes Pltillhblcent for the ~epfbicyclt~ts and wlte~ IJicyelists ate prohibitedfimiddotom 11sing 11 StateJJighway alternataTOIIliS

The DeplltllneJit nraybullellter into cqopetStjve ltgrtements witll pulgt1ir ~~gencies fol the c()nstruction and maintenartce ofnonmotoriied trlli1Spltgtltatfon f~illties whillh gerterally follow a Statjhi-glway righl of waymiddot where the Departtnerit ha~ determined that the facility will improvegtsafetymiddot and convenience forbicyclists

(lJ Aftit COJ)Siiltlrtg with tJJe 111w eufotcementageney ha~ingptimary traffic law enforcement responsibility widt rtspel)t tp wStltliet highway_the Department m~zy conamptruct and lllllintafu n~gtnMtodzed fa~ili(ie approximately parillein~ that highbullVy

(b) Where the trafficnfety or Cllpaiitymiddotof he highway would be ihcreas~ tile Depaltment shall pay for be construction Md maintenance of nonrttotorized tran~odalioo facilities approxitnatelr pan~Ueling tile 1ighwiY

ll) lJ1eLegislature finds middotand declares that tlte construction and maintenance qf nonmotork~ transportation facilities eltmsttUttnl highway pllljl6se-tmderArti~l~ XIX of frt~ California oonsiitutlon andjustlfY the apeitditWe ofhighway- funds and the ex-ercise of eminent domaintherefor

middotnie Department Shall not construct a freeway that will sever or desboy m eJ~iampting major routefor noi1I)1otoriz~ tratficcunlltss a teMGnable safe mdconVenlent alternate route r~ pro~~1iled ot such a route exlst-s

Speeifies circumstances unjler whlch tbe Deparnnem sllall lncerporate nonmotorlzod transpQtiation facilities in tho design of froewayamp-911 theshyState RignllY System

ReWftl 3 nili1imuinQf $360000 tll be bufigeted annually from the State Highway At()ount for JorunotQri-wd ttlrulporultipn falilities to be used in conjunetlon wilh the State lllghway System

1-8

ppclt~tdxl ~1 1ll ~tat~ AlliCpoundfut1Jg ll k~llUI ttflll Waikltu

~~~~s md Hi~wa~ lt~J~k

ScctiOfl t876

Section888

Section88S2

Section 8884

Tlie DeparlmeJl( ltay aequitl rt)a) property lor rhecon~truction anltI tMmiddotinterianc~of ntigtJPQtoii~ea UArt$JI)ffalon fl9illties

Tllete is a llicyckfaciliticsc001ditllltot Ill the Department Who i~shybulltespousible fur (be middotadmini~trarton of bkycle-J11)ated activities ot the Qepanment

The-Depanme11r shall publis~1 a middotstatewide m~p lltistrating amprare liighway lQUes Pltillhblcent for the ~epfbicyclt~ts and wlte~ IJicyelists ate prohibitedfimiddotom 11sing 11 StateJJighway alternataTOIIliS

The DeplltllneJit nraybullellter into cqopetStjve ltgrtements witll pulgt1ir ~~gencies fol the c()nstruction and maintenartce ofnonmotoriied trlli1Spltgtltatfon f~illties whillh gerterally follow a Statjhi-glway righl of waymiddot where the Departtnerit ha~ determined that the facility will improvegtsafetymiddot and convenience forbicyclists

(lJ Aftit COJ)Siiltlrtg with tJJe 111w eufotcementageney ha~ingptimary traffic law enforcement responsibility widt rtspel)t tp wStltliet highway_the Department m~zy conamptruct and lllllintafu n~gtnMtodzed fa~ili(ie approximately parillein~ that highbullVy

(b) Where the trafficnfety or Cllpaiitymiddotof he highway would be ihcreas~ tile Depaltment shall pay for be construction Md maintenance of nonrttotorized tran~odalioo facilities approxitnatelr pan~Ueling tile 1ighwiY

ll) lJ1eLegislature finds middotand declares that tlte construction and maintenance qf nonmotork~ transportation facilities eltmsttUttnl highway pllljl6se-tmderArti~l~ XIX of frt~ California oonsiitutlon andjustlfY the apeitditWe ofhighway- funds and the ex-ercise of eminent domaintherefor

middotnie Department Shall not construct a freeway that will sever or desboy m eJ~iampting major routefor noi1I)1otoriz~ tratficcunlltss a teMGnable safe mdconVenlent alternate route r~ pro~~1iled ot such a route exlst-s

Speeifies circumstances unjler whlch tbe Deparnnem sllall lncerporate nonmotorlzod transpQtiation facilities in tho design of froewayamp-911 theshyState RignllY System

ReWftl 3 nili1imuinQf $360000 tll be bufigeted annually from the State Highway At()ount for JorunotQri-wd ttlrulporultipn falilities to be used in conjunetlon wilh the State lllghway System

1-8

Sections 890middot8942

Seotion21Ofi(b)

Pnblle Utilities ltAIJ~t

Seetiens992133 aud 99400

Vehicle-Code -Siclion 21200

Stetitin 2120l

Section l 202

Section 21206

Se_ct(oil2l2075

Sectian21208

Section2~~(9

Sectfon 2 l21 0

Seetlon Zl2ll

Section 1 1212

S~tiOI 2 l l-17

Section 21949

he DCJ~ntmUlt may wltleJ]ake lterooostratioi~ projects perubrm techn(ll stu~ie~ gtlgtd l1$e +-~vailabiaftqertt funds f()~ ritc ormiddotloc11l ageMy bicgclepmgmrns

Definelt~ oicyde~tommuters -and bikeway~ and aquile the beparunent to establislt minimum ftk~w~y design ctiiUi~ outline-hikeway plarl r~uitement~ nd admin~lel he Bicycle TibullanijJOJiaiion Aeltaon

sp~ifies the moonl to betronsferret into the Bcy~leTratlSp(VlgtiHOli Acetlunt

Golertis tlie useofloeli1Tra11~])6rtaftoll fmd revenues fQr llorunotl)ttzeU project$ The Transportation Development Act af 197I Cleated tleseproIISiQDsbull

Bicyclist s tightll and respo)lsibilides for ICavelingonblghways

Biccle equipment~uirmeots on roadWllyS b(ghways sidewalks o)Jke p~ths etc

Bieyclisfs position onrPlldways wheu travlling slowElr tlaJ the normal tlaffic sgeed

Allows JocaLagelCies t6 reglllate opemtion ofbicentyrJes Oli pedestiian ov bicyole facilities

Allows JucaJ atellCies to estagtlisli bike lllllesou non-state highways

Proliiliits mofOrized bicycles on bUcepathsot btke lrules

Specifies permitted movementsbymiddotbityd ists lJtom bike lanes

S~cjf)e9 pefhliUedtnowemMtsbY Illotodstsin bike lanes

Prohibits bicentyde par1 ing on sidew11lks unless pedestriAnS have au adequale path

lrohlbis impeding Qr ob~trustlon centfbicycli~ts middotOllbike path~

Requires a bicyclist less kh1111 18 years ofageto wearbull an approvea helmet

~~uires a motprist tomiddotdfive inabike tltJ1eprior to malting a tum

RequLres at levels oFglvernmeot in the State toprovide safe ana convluient facililils fpr pecdetgtttiArt~t

Ill

~ceLlon 2 l9n0

Section 2 14505

Gltbullrnrn~tnt Coillt ScQtion65U402

Section 6oJl

Authlllity to elese h1ewuymiddot nurl Mjlfigtlt~Woys 10 1Heycl lrt6 11lt1 jJedeMllihliS

R~qu1roo d~tectJ01ll)f hJt)rJe m1t rnotorc)lclJ~ ~(traffic wtUllt~tl ~lgnals

RequiJmiddot~s develofmeil of goielelfues for illcluding al1rltml mod($ il1

gefleralplan circulation elements

Require~~ gneal plan citculation elements to plan for all users of streets roads and high ways

AeJcndix II Nonmotorized Information Websites US Deparlment of Transponation BicyclePedeslIian Design Guidance httpwwwfhwadotgovenvirorunembikepeddes-ignhtm

Deputy Directive DD-64R l - Califomia Department of Transpoltation Policy on Complete Streets - Integrating the Transportation System httpwwwdotelt~govhqtppofficesocpcomglete streets filesdd 64 r1 signedpdf

Assembly Concurrent Resolution 211 - Encourages loelt~l agencies to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians in their infrastructure httpwwwdotcagovhqtppofficeslbikelguidelines filesguidelines filespdf

Caltrans Division of Local Assistance- Nonmowrized project funding httpwwwdotcagovhqLocaPrograms

Caltrans Division ofTransp01tation Planning - Bicycle Program httpwwwdotcagovhgtppofficeslbikeindexhtml

HDM httpwwwdotcagovhqloppdlhdmlhdtntochtm

CAMUTCD httpwwwdotcagovhQtraffopssigntecbmutcdsupppdfcamutcdCalifomiaMUTCDpdf

Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Program hnpwwwdotcagovhgLocalProgramslbtaibtawebPagehtm

Project Development Procedures Manual Chapter 31- Nonrnotorized Transportation Facilities httpwww dotcagovlhgfoppdpdpmchap pdfchapt3lJdf

Department ofTransportation Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Contacts httpwwwdotcagovhqtppofficesbikecontactshtrnl

Livable Commw1ities Information httpwwwdotcagovhqtpplofficesocplivable communitieshtml

Active Transportation I Livable Communities Working Group httpwwwdotcagovhqtopofficeslocpllivable communitieshtml

Transportation Tools to Improve Childrens Health and Mobility httpwwwdotelt~govhgLocalProgramsTransoortationToolsforSR2Spdf

Transportation Enhancements Program httpwwwdotcagovhgTransEnbActfransEnaclhtm

Environmental Enlmncement and Mitigation Program httuwwwdotcagovhqLocaProgramsEEMhornepagehtm

21

Appendi~ Ill Bkyctt~Trampoabulltation Accoum Environmental Enhuwe1tcnt aud Mitlgpound1tlon Ferlmmiddotal and StateSafu Routes to School Approved P1middotoieds