1
a h 0 v Detector F ion z 0 R. J. Peláez, C. Blondel, C. Delsart and C. Drag Laboratoire Aimé-Cotton, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, batiment 505, Univ. Paris-sud, F-91405 Orsay cedex, France Photodetachment microscopy with a pulsed laser Experiment set-up qF a 0 max 2 az R 2 3 0 3 2 a N Interfranges distance a z N R i 3 0 0 max 3 Pulsed laser 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 : Source and simple lens doublet (“Einzellens") 2,5,9,10 : Deflection plates 3,6,8 : Simple lenses 4 : Wien filter 7 : Deflection 11 : Focalisation quadrupole 12 : Deceleration plates 13 : Interection zone C D F U Pumped QCW 20 Hz, 515 nm Ti:Sa QCW, 150 µs Dual polarization stabilized He-Ne Sigmameter QCW Lambdameter WSU uncertain. +/- 0.041 m -1 Frequency doubled Nd:YAG 25 mJ @ 532 nm Pulsed Ti:Sa ~ 10 mJ @ 810 nm BBO ~ 1 mJ @ 405 nm 15 ns L. Cabaret and C. Drag, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 65 (2006) L. Cabaret, Appl. Phys. B 94, 71 (2009) 1 S 0 2 P 3/2 F 1 = 5/2 F 2 = 1 F 2 = 2 F 2 = 3 F 2 = 4 I [F 2 ]=2 F 2 +1 14.097 m -1 6.5575 m -1 2.46 m -1 e A=2467287(3) m -1 Electron Count Radius (mm) 2467275 2467280 2467285 2467290 2467295 0 100 200 300 400 Laser pulse energy (m icroJ) E lectron affinity (m -1 Electron affinity (m -1 ) Laser pulse energy (µJ) Quantum parameters : Number of rings Classical parameters Radial current density Principle: Y.N. Demkov et al., JETP Lett. 34, 403 (1981) Photodetachment microscopy: C. Blondel et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 77, 3755 (1996) Photoionization microscopy: C. Nicole et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 88, 133001 (2002) Molecular photodetachment microscopy : C. Delsart et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 89, 183002 (2002) Highest height Maximum radius 3 2 0 2 mqF 0 = 0.045 m a = 0.35 m R F = 427 Vm -1 = 0,926 ± 0,002 cm -1 R max j 14 15 14 : Laser 15 : Column of constant F 16 : MCP 17 : Phosphor screen 18 : CCD negativ e ion neutral atom h e A 18 1 6 17 Accumulation Barycenter Photodetachment microscopy Results : electron affinity of 127 I 2 ' 2 1 2 1 U F C D h A Tunable single longitudinal mode. Long & short time stabilization Nanosecond pulse Uncertainty ≈0.8 m -1 Energy ≈ 400J Main proprieties 1980 1990 2000 2010 Y ear Electron A finity (eV) 3.05899 3.05904 3.05909 3.05914 3.05919 E xperim ent 2467275 2467280 2467285 2467290 2467295 0 20 40 60 80 100 Photoelectron average energy (m -1 ) Electron afinity (m -1 ) 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Electron A finity Theory Experim ent Electron Affinity (eV) E l e c t r o n A f f i n i t y ( e V ) Ponderomotive effect : electron oscillations in electromagnetic waves. 2 2 2 P 4 m E q U R. J. Peláez et al. J. Phys. B. 42, 125001 (2009) e A( 127 I) = 24672.867 (28) cm -1 = 3.0590453 (36) eV Ponderomotive effect has been negligible, for two reasons: i) Blue wavelength (405 nm for I - ) ii) Low energy ≈ 400µJ VI International Conference on Photonic, Electronic, and Atomic Collisions. lamazoo, Michigan 22 - 28 July 2009 a z R R j 0 2 0 2 4 1 ) ( A i

Detector

  • Upload
    pink

  • View
    25

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

D. F. 7. C. 8. U. 6.  1 : Source and simple lens doublet (“Einzellens") 2,5,9,10 : Deflection plates 3,6,8 : Simple lenses. 10. 4. 5. 12. Detector. 2. 14 : Laser 15 : Column of constant F 16 : MCP 17 : Phosphor screen 18 : CCD. 4 : Wien filter 7 : Deflection  - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Detector

ah 0v

Detector

Fion

z0

R. J. Peláez, C. Blondel, C. Delsart and C. DragLaboratoire Aimé-Cotton, Centre national de la recherche

scientifique, batiment 505,Univ. Paris-sud, F-91405 Orsay cedex, France

Photodetachment microscopy with a pulsed laser

Experiment set-up

qFa

0max 2 azR

23

032

aN

Interfrangesdistance

a

z

NR

i3

00max 3

Pulsed laser

7

6

5 4

3

2

1

8

9

10

11

12

13

 1 : Source and simple lens doublet (“Einzellens") 2,5,9,10 : Deflection plates3,6,8 : Simple lenses

4 : Wien filter7 : Deflection  11 : Focalisation quadrupole 12 : Deceleration plates13 : Interection zone

C

D

F

U

Pumped QCW20 Hz, 515 nm

Ti:SaQCW, 150 µs

Dual polarizationstabilized He-Ne

Sigmameter QCW

Lambdameter WSUuncertain. +/- 0.041 m-1

Frequency doubled Nd:YAG 25 mJ @ 532 nm

Pulsed Ti:Sa~ 10 mJ @ 810 nm

BBO

~ 1 mJ @ 405 nm 15 ns

L. Cabaret and C. Drag, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 65 (2006)

L. Cabaret, Appl. Phys. B 94, 71 (2009)

1S0

2P3/2

F1 = 5/2

F2 = 1F2 = 2F2 = 3

F2 = 4

I [F2]=2 F2 +1

14.097 m-1

6.5575 m-1

2.46 m-1

eA=2467287(3) m-1

Ele

ctro

n C

oun

t

Radius (mm)

2467275

2467280

2467285

2467290

2467295

0 100 200 300 400Laser pulse energy (microJ)

Ele

ctr

on

aff

init

y (

m-1

)Ele

ctro

n a

ffinit

y (

m-1)

Laser pulse energy (µJ)

Quantum parameters :

Number of rings

Classical parameters

Radial current density

Principle: Y.N. Demkov et al., JETP Lett. 34, 403 (1981)

Photodetachment microscopy: C. Blondel et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 77, 3755 (1996)

Photoionization microscopy: C. Nicole et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 88, 133001 (2002)

Molecular photodetachment microscopy : C. Delsart et al., Phys. Rev . Lett. 89, 183002 (2002)

Highest height

Maximum radius

32

0 2mqF

0 = 0.045 ma = 0.35 m

R

F = 427 Vm-1

= 0,926 ± 0,002 cm-1

Rmax

j

14

15

14 : Laser 15 : Column of constant F16 : MCP17 : Phosphor screen18 : CCD

negative

ion

neutral atom

h

eA

18

16

17

Accumulation Barycenter

Photodetachment microscopy

Results : electron affinity of 127I

2

'

2

1

21

U

F

C

DhA

Tunable single longitudinal mode.Long & short time stabilization

Nanosecond pulse

Uncertainty ≈0.8 m-1

Energy ≈ 400J

Main proprieties

1980 1990 2000 2010Year

Ele

ctro

n A

fin

ity

(eV

)

3.05899

3.05904

3.05909

3.05914

3.05919

Experiment

2467275

2467280

2467285

2467290

2467295

0 20 40 60 80 100

Photoelectron average energy (m-1)

Ele

ctro

n afi

nity

(m

-1)

2.7

2.8

2.9

3.0

3.1

3.2

1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

Ele

ctro

n A

fin

ity

Theory

Experiment

Ele

ctro

n A

ffinit

y (

eV

)

Ele

ctron A

ffinity

(eV

)

Ponderomotive effect : electron oscillations in electromagnetic waves.

2

22

P4 m

EqU

R. J. Peláez et al. J. Phys. B. 42, 125001 (2009)

eA(127I) = 24672.867 (28) cm-1

= 3.0590453 (36) eV

Ponderomotive effect has been negligible, for two reasons:i) Blue wavelength (405 nm

for I-)ii) Low energy ≈ 400µJ

XXVI International Conference on Photonic, Electronic, and Atomic Collisions.Kalamazoo, Michigan 22 - 28 July 2009

a

z

RRj

0

2

0

2

4

1)(

Ai