DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Bhavnagar/IWMP1.pdf · DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ... Bhavnagar is appointed as ... for one hundred days

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (IWMP – 1 DPR) PIA :- Dy. Conservator of forests – Bhavnagar

- 1 -

[Year]

PIA:- Social Forestry Bhavnagar

Division

Dist:- Bhavnagar

[Pick the date]

Detailed Project Report : 1 Kaniyad

SLNA:- Gujarat State

Watershed

Management Agency


- 2 -

Contents

Table no.1: Basic Project Information .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

Table no.2: Weightage of the projec ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10

Table no.3: Watershed Information .................................................................................................................................................................................... 10

Table no.4: Developmental Programmes Running in the Project Area ........................................................................................................................... 12

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area ................................................................................................................................. 13

Table no. 6: PIA ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

Table no. 8: Land Use Pattern .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

Table no. 9: Soil Type and Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19

Table no. 10: Flood and Drought Condition ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress) ................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 13: Physiography and Relief ............................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details ................................................................................................................................................................................ 22

Table no. 15: Agriculture ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22


- 3 -

Table no. 16: Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23

Table no. 17: Crop Details .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Table no. 18: Livestock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 19: Drinking Water .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 21: Demographic Information ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26

Table no. 22: Literacy Rate .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27

Table no. 23: Migration Details ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no. 24: Poverty ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 25: Village Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH Assets .................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 27: Income ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .......................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution) ......................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects ............................................................................................................................. 33

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee Details ........................................................................................................................................................................ 35

Table no. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details – Bodi ....................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Kaniyad ................................................................................................................................................. 37


- 4 -

Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Babarkot ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no. 32 B: SHG Detail - Bodi ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 41

Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail-Kaniyad .................................................................................................................................................................................... 41

Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail : Limboda ................................................................................................................................................................................. 42

Table No. 32 E SHG Detail : Limboda .................................................................................................................................................................................. 42

Table No. 33 A: UG Detail- Babarkot .................................................................................................................................................................................. 43

Table No. 33 B: UG Detail- Bodi .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Kaniyad .................................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Table No. 33 D: UG Detail – Limboda .................................................................................................................................................................................. 44

Table No. 33 E : UG Detail- Piparadi ................................................................................................................................................................................... 44

Table no.34 A- Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................................................... 47

Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .......................................................................................... 48

Table no.36 A : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................... 49

Table no.36 : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................. 51

Table No. 37.: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................ 52

Table no. 38 ctivities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ( 10 % Estimate) ................................................................... 53

Table No.40: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*- .......................................................................................................................... 55

Table No.42: Details of Allied / Other Activities ................................................................................................................................................................ 58


- 5 -

Table No.43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas .................................................................................................................................. 65

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ........................................................................................................................................................................ 66

Table No. 45: Capacity Building Plan .................................................................................................................................................................................. 67

Table No.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities ............................................................................................................................. 68

Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project ............................................................................................................................................................... 68

Table No. 48: Village-wise - Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP ............................................................................................................... 69

Table No.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes ............................................................................................................................... 70

Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects ...................................................................................................................................... 72

Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 73

Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area ....................................................................................................................................... 73

Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters) ................................................................................... 74

Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water .............................................................................................................................................................................. 74

Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas ............................................................................................................................. 75

Table No. 57: Area under Horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................... 76

Table No. 58: Forest/Vegetative Cover ............................................................................................................................................................................. 76

Table No. 59: Details of Livestock in the Project Areas ..................................................................................................................................................... 77

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages ....................................................................................................................................................................... 77


- 6 -

Chapter – 1

Project Background


- 7 -

Table no.1: Basic Project Information

The project is situated in Botad Taluka of Bhavnagar District. The project comprises five villages Kaniyad, Limboda, Piparadi, Bodi,

Babarkot . Total Geographical Area of the cluster is 5269.40 Ha. & the proposed Project Area is 5269.40 Ha.. Total project cost is Rs 632.33 Lacs.

The biggest village is Kaniyad, so project cluster is identified with its name. District Watershed Development Unit, Bhavnagar is appointed as

Project Managing Authority and Deputy Conservator of Forests, Social Forestry, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar is appointed as Project

Implementing Agency for this project.

All the Five villages are well connected with pucca road. Main communities in the villages are Patel, Koli, Kshtriya, Devipujak, Maldhari &

Harijan . People of these villages are primarily dependent on rain-fed agriculture, agriculture based labour and animal husbandry. There are

streams named Bhadar and Goma River in the project area.

Table no. 1A: Area Proposed to be Treated

Sr.

No.

Name of the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the

project

Area

proposed to

be treated

Total

project

cost

PIA Name Census code

1 IWMP – 1

Babarkot 140010096950000 Babarkot

Botad Bhavnagar

1437.8 1437.8 172.53 Forest

Extension

Dept

Bhavnagar

2 Bodi 140010096880000 Bodi 939.30 439.30 52.72

3 Kaniyad 140010096940000 Kaniyad 2064.1 1564.10 187.69


- 8 -

4 Limboda 140010096840000 Limboda 942.80 942.80 113.14

5 Piparadi 1400100890000 Piparadi 885.4 885.40 106.25

Total 6269.4 5269.4 632.33

Prioritization of the Project

Prioritization of micro watershed has been done by considering socio-economic as well as physical parameters. Watershed

Development Program is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual Wages, Percentage

of Small and Marginal Farmers, Ground Water Status, Moisture Index, Area under Rain-fed Agriculture, Drinking Water Situation in the Area,

Percentage of Degraded Land, Productivity Potential of the Land, Continuity of Another Watershed that has already Developed/Treated, Cluster

Approach for Plain or Hilly Terrain. Based on 13 parameters priority map has been prepared by BISAG, Gandhinagar which provides technical

support for watershed projects in Gujarat state and a composite ranking is given to Kaniyad Watershed Project as given in table no. 2. Cluster

approach was followed taking into consideration four micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5269.4 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 632.33

Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S. No.

Criteria Maximum

Score Ranges & Scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) Iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)


- 9 -

Iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

Vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

Ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

X Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

Xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)

Xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5


- 10 -

Table no.2: Weightage of the project

Project

name

Project

type

Weightage

IWMP –

1 Other

I Ii Iii Iv V Vi Vii Viii ix X Xi xii Xiii Total

7.5 5 5 5 3 15 5 5 5 5 15 15 0 90.5

Project type: Hilly/Desert/Other

Table no.3: Watershed Information

Name of the

project

No. Of

watersheds to

be treated

Watershed code Watershed

regime/type/order

IWMP 1 5 5G2C6m1a, 5G2C6m1b, 5G2C9c1g, 5G2C9c1h, 5G2C9a2d Other


- 11 -

IWMP – 1 (Kaniyad) Bhavnagar


- 12 -

Other Rural Development Program:

The villages have been benefited by various schemes of rural development. Currently MGNREGA, Indira Awas Yojana, Sardar Awas

Yojana & Total Sanitation Campaign are running in the villages. This is the first watershed project in these Villages.

i. MGNREGS: (MNREGA) is an Indian job guarantee scheme, enacted by legislation on August 25, 2005. The scheme provides a legal guarantee

for one hundred days of employment in every financial year to adult members of any rural household willing to do public work-related

unskilled manual work at the statutory minimum wage of Rs.100 per day. Earthen bunds, Desilting and Afforestation activity has been carried

out in the villages under MGNREGA.

ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All remaining households will be covered

under the scheme.

iii. Awas Yojana: Houses for people under poverty line (BPL) have been constructed under Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) & Saradar Awas

Yojana(SAY).

Table no.4: Developmental Programmes Running in the Project Area

Sr.

no.

Name of the

programme/scheme

Sponsoring

agency

Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages

covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

1 Saradar Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 1998-99 5 493

2 M G N R E G A Rural Dev. Dept. Employment 2008-09 5 1351

3 Indira Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 1990-92 5 242

4 T S C Rural Dev. Dept. Construct Toilet 2007-08 5 985

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_guarantee

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage


- 13 -

Pre IWMP Project in Project Area

Integrated Wasteland Development Program is in implementation phase in Kaniyad & Bodi village out of total 2 villages. No other

villages are benefited by Watershed Project till now. Only 1000 ha out of total area of kaniyad & Bodi village were planned to be treated.

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed Programmes in the Project Area

Sr.

No.

Project

name

Year

start-ed

Name

of

village

No. of

micro

water

-shed

Water-

shed

codes

Area

under

treat-

ment

Funding

source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

Expenditure

incurred up

to start of

IWMP

%

financial

completi

on

%

physical

complet

ion

1 IWDP 2004-05 Kaniyad

1 5G2C6k1a 500 GOI/GOG DWDU TALUKA

PANCHAYAT 30.0 15.00 50 50

2

State

Waters

hed

2000-01 Bodi 1 5G2C9c1b 500 GOI/GOG DWDU GLDC 20.00 20.00 100 100


- 14 -

Chapter – 2

Project Implementation Agency


- 15 -

Project Implementing Agency

Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under

State/Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research Bodies, Intermediates, Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of

IWMP – 1 Kaniyad Watershed Project is Social Forestry Division, Bhavnagar Division, Bhavnagar.

District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU)

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Bhavnagar is a district level nodal agency and was established where area is more

than 25000Ha for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of

the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs compromising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department)

a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and Multidisciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Community Mobilization Expert, Civil Engineer,

Computer Operator, Surveyor and Accountant are recruited.

The objectives of DWDU are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and

related development activities in the district, also DWDU will work as PIA for IWMP projects.

Table no. 6: PIA

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1

Kaniyad : IWMP-1

i. Type of organization Government of Gujarat

ii. Name of organization Forest Department Social Forestry,

iii. Designation & Address Annexy Building, F-8, Bahumali Bhavan - Bhavnagar


- 16 -

iv. Telephone 0278-2428350

v. Fax 0278-2428350

vi. E-mail fo-sf@bav

Each PIA has put in position a dedicated watershed development team (WDT) with the approval of DWDU. The WDTs are hired on

contract for 11 months. The composition of the WDT will be indicated in the contract/ MOU. No program funds for DPR and watershed works

under any circumstances should be released to either the PIA or Watershed Committee (WC) unless the composition of the WDT has been

clearly indicated in the MOU/ contract and the team members are fully in place. Three WDTs viz. agriculture, Civil Engineering & social

mobilization - institutional building experts have been recruited. For assistance in office work Accountant, data entry operator, surveyor &

messenger have been recruited.

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level

Sr.

No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned

Monthly

remuneration

1 Shri N.A.Chaudhari M Dy. C.F. B.sc 33 Overall Supervision Govt. Employee

2 Shri D.G.Joshi M Nodal Officer / R.F.O. B.Com. Implementation Govt. Employee

3 Gohil Ganpatsinh M. 30 M WDT Agri. BRS / MSW 5 Years 3 Months

Agril. Expert 10,000/-

4 Patel Mayank H. 30 M Surveyor Surveyer 3 Years Technical Surveying 6,000/-

5 Pandya Rakesh K. 29 M Data Operater B.A. / B.Ed. 4 Years 5 Months

Data Entry 6,000/-

6 Jogadiya Haresh K. 32 M Massanger 12 Pass 3 Years Office Routine Work 3,000/-

7 Bhavnaben J. 37 F WDT. Co. BRS 3 Years-4 Month

Community Mobilization

8000/-


- 17 -

Chapter – 3

Basic Information of the Project


- 18 -

Basic Information of Botad Taluka

Botad is one of the fastest growing town in Gujarat with a modest voter population of more than 1.75 lakh. However, the amenities that this city

boasts of and its location (Ahmedabad-170 km / Bhavnagar-90 / Rajkot-120 / Surendranagar-90 - all district centers) can make many cities feel envy.

As of 2001 India census, Botad had a population of 100,059. Males constitute 53% of the population and females 47%. Botad has an average literacy

rate of 64%, higher than the national average of 59.5%; with male literacy of 71% and female literacy of 55%. 15% of the population is under 6 years of age.

Botad has a tropical wet and dry climate, with hot, dry summers from mid-March to mid-June, the wet monsoon season from mid-June to October,

when the city receives 620 mm of rain on average. The months from November to February are mild, the average temperature being around 20°C, with low

humidity. Thunderstorms are another important part of the Botad weather in the months of June and July. Fog is one of the major phenomena of Botad

climate during winter. During summer time, the temperature ranges between 24°C and 42°C. In the months of winter, Botad temperature varies between

10°C and 22°C.

Table no. 8: Land Use Pattern

S. No. Names of

village

Geographical Area

of the village Forest Area

Land under

agricultural use

Rain-fed

area

Permanent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 Babarkot 1437.80 38.82 920.19 1150.2 0 186.91 129.4

2 Bodi 439.3 11.86 281.15 351.4 0 57.11 39.54

3 Kaniyad 1564.1 42.23 1001.02 1251.3 0 203.33 140.77

4 Limboda 942.80 25.46 603.39 75.2 0 122.56 84.85

5 Piparadi 885.4 23.91 566.66 708.03 0 115.1 79.69


- 19 -

As Bhavnagar district is a part of Saurashtra region, the major type of soil is Vertisols. It may form residually from weathered

limestone or basalt. These soils are generally developed from parent materials that are rich in alkaline earth cations (Ca and Mg). The

weathering of these rocks produces black cotton soil type clay. Normally Waste lands the soils where weathering is not completed.

Table no. 9: Soil Type and Topography

S. No.

Name of the Agro-

climatic zone covers

project area

Area in

Ha.

Names of the

villages

Major soil types

Topography a)Type b) Area in Ha.

1 North Saurashtra 5269.40

Babarkot

Shallow Medium Black

1447.8

Plain and Undulating

Bodi 939.04

Kaniyad 2064.01

Limboda 942.80

Piparadi 885.4

# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope

Table no. 10: Flood and Drought Condition

Sr. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Babarkot once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year

2 Bodi once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year

3 Kaniyad once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year

4 Limboda once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year

5 Piparadi once in a 10 year Once in a 3 year


- 20 -

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity Ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

IWMP-1 200, 109, 103, 102,48/5, 1/1, 278/2, 245/1, 264/6, 101/3, 135/9 7.0 TO 8.20 Natural

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Babarkot Nil Nil

Bodi 126p1, 140p2, 139p1, 138, 104p1, 142 Rain for Water logging

Kaniyad 183p7, 183p8, 264p2, 191p1, 196p2 Rain for Water logging

Limboda 180, 180p1, 180p2, 180p3, 81, 78, 15p1, 15p2 Rain for Water logging

Piparadi 36p1, 35, 14, 33p1, 78, 83, 79, 100, 165p2 Rain for Water logging


- 21 -

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions

Table no. 13: Physiography and Relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP 1 35 0 to 5% Gama River, Sukhbhadar,

Year Rain fall

Mm

Average temperature (degree C)

Summer Average temperature (deg C) Winter

Max Min Max Min

2005 702 45 33.04 19.02 16.00

2006 501 44.10 31.07 26.02 15.15

2007 901 42.08 29..55 26.05 19.60

2008 735 45.10 32.45 21.00 18.97

2009 294 46.5 30.20 24.15 18.57


- 22 -

Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details

Sl

no Village

Total owned land HHs giving land

on lease

HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Babarkot 26 372 44 - - -

2 Bodi - 415 13 - - -

3 Kaniyad 50 644 18 - - -

4 Limboda - 338 22 - - -

5 Piparadi 200 159 26 - - -

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Babarkot 920.19 450 -

2 Bodi 779.6 367 115

3 Kaniyad 1001.02 560 -

4 Limboda 796.60 385 87

5 Piparadi 770 342 72


- 23 -

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sl

no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability

months

Net area

( Hac.) Gross area

Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability

months

Net area

(Hac.)

Gross

area

1 Babarkot 3 365 920.19 - - - 3 225 920.19

2 Bodi 3 281 439.3 - - - 3 100 439.3

3 Kaniyad - - - - - - 4 560 1564.1

4 Limboda 3 603.39 942.80 - - - 3 276 942.80

5 Piparadi - - - - - - 2 to 4 432.3 885.4

Table no. 17: Crop Details

Sr

no Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Jowar/Millet Crop 3 Sesame

Area Ha. Production

Ton

Productivity

Kg Area Ha.

Production

Productivity

Area Ha. Production Productivity

1 Babarkot 650 31200 1080 220 10800 2040 150 1800 480

2 Bodi 536 28944 1200 80 7200 1800 163 1956 360

3 Kaniyad 960 35150 1800 500 45000 2160 96 1152 360

4 Limboda 664 31832 1200 100 9000 6000 32 384 480

5 Piparadi 575 24150 1560 100 9000 2040 95 1140 2400


- 24 -

Sr.

No.

Village

Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Cumin Crop 2 Crop 3

Area Ha. Production

Ton

Productivity

Area Ha.

Production

Ton

Productivity

Ton Area Ha.

Production

Ton

Productivity

Ton

1 Babarkot - - - - - - - - -

2 Bodi 40 240 360 - - - - -

3 Kaniyad 166 996 360 - - - - - -

4 Limboda - - - - - - - - -

5 Piparadi - - - - - - - - -

As the area does not enjoy assured irrigation facility, Rabi crop can’t be grown in whole agricultural land. Other than agricultural food crops farmers

use to grow animal fodder in some part out of total land. As water shortage is a big issue no crop can be taken in summer. Overall only one or two crops are

taken in year. As no Irrigation facility is available no one grow anything in summer.

Sr.

No. Village Zaid (Summer)

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3

Area Ha. Production

Ton

Productivity

Ton Area Ha.

Production

Ton

Productivity

Ton Area Ha.

Production

Ton

Productivity

Ton

1 Babarkot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


- 25 -

2 Bodi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Kaniyad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Limboda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Piparadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr. No. Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk (Buffalo Cow)

/Year Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Babarkot 77 460 77 308 768 44 66 3 108 - 172

2 Bodi 393 1600 807 2800 4400 702 622 556 98 - 314

3 Kaniyad 799 3600 789 3156 6756 106 159 - 50 - 194

4 Limboda 381 1714 593 2372 4087 413 619 111 100 - 786

5 Piparadi 415 1700 412 1400 3100 702 622 1072 210 - 372

Table no. 19: Drinking Water

Sr. No. Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Babarkot 30 to 45 Narmada Pipe line 8th Months -

2 Bodi 30 to 45 Narmada Pipe line 10th Months -

3 Kaniyad 30 to 45 Well & Narmada Pipe line

Only Narmada Pipe line 8th Months -

4 Limboda 30 to 45

Well & Narmada Pipe line Only Narmada Pipe line 9th Months -

5 Piparadi 30 to 45 Well & Narmada Pipe line

Only Narmada Pipe line 10th Months -


- 26 -

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr.

No.

Names of

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. Persons

Govt.

(Specify

dept.)

PRI

Any other

(Pl.

Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(Specify

deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1

IWMP- 1

Kaniyad

Wasteland/ degraded land - 937.4 - - - - - -

Pastures - 382.30 - - - - - -

Forest - 142.28 - - - - - -

Table no. 21: Demographic Information

Sr.

No. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Babarkot 984 517 467 30 18 12 3% - - - -

2 Bodi 2261 1158 1103 130 67 63 5.74% - - - -

3 Kaniyad 5311 2762 2548 107 57 50 2% - - - -

4 Limboda 1683 891 792 69 32 37 4% - - - -

5 Piparadi 1906 980 926 335 167 168 17.57% - - - -


- 27 -

Table no. 22: Literacy Rate

Sr. No. Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14

Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Babarkot 984 53.34 270 66.34 101 40.15 - -

2 Bodi 2261 44.43 610 64.65 208 8.3 - -

3 Kaniyad 5311 39.67 1250 57.71 406 20.22 - -

4 Limboda 1683 50.91 513 72.00 161 26.31 - -

5 Piparadi 1906 64.04 624 79.90 395 47.61 - -

Table no. 23: Migration Details

Sr.

No. Village

Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for

migration

Income during

migration / month Total Male Female Up to 3

months

3-6

months

More than 6

months

1 Babarkot 984 100 70 30 - - Y Better employment, low

productivity of land 5000

2 Bodi 2261 75 45 30 - Y -

Better employment, low


3 Kaniyad 5311 7 20 10 - Y -



4

Limboda 1683 70 40 30 - Y -




- 28 -

5 Piparadi 1906 65 35 30 Y - -



Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr.

No. Village Total Household

BPL % of BPL HH Total Land less HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Babarkot 147 48 59 107 72% 72 48%

2 Bodi 346 34 36 70 20% 84 24%

3 Kaniyad 653 29 179 208 31% 122 18%

4 Limboda 364 17 36 53 14% 53 14%

5 Piparadi 397 114 183 297 74% 93 23%

Table no. 25: Village Infrastructure

Sr.

No. Village

Pucca

road to

the

village

(Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post

Office

(Distance)

Km.

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from

nearest

market

yard

Km.

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperative

(Number)

Other

cooperatives

/ CBIs

(Number)

Any other

institution LP UP HS

1 Babarkot Y 1 1 1 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1 -

2 Bodi Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 7 0 0 1 -

3 Kaniyad Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 15 1 0 1 -


- 29 -

4 Limboda Y 1 1 0 0 5.00 0 12 1 0 1 -

5 Piparadi Y 1 1 0 0 0.00 0 15 1 0 1 -

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH Assets

Sr.

No. Village

HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs

with

freeze Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Babarkot 147 95 17 57 18 10 107 27 147 22

2 Bodi 346 265 21 185 46 12 273 37 346 33

3 Kaniyad 653 473 70 370 73 8 512 113 653 57

4 Limboda 364 255 13 197 24 7 174 8 364 32

5 Piparadi 397 285 37 257 33 17 293 47 397 39

Table no. 27: Income

Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Babarkot 300.00 37.00

1.17 2.00 340.17

2 Bodi 293.00 42.00

1.17 2.00 338.17

3 Kaniyad 300.00 16.2

4.00 1.00 159.2

4 Limboda 264.00

42.00 1.32 1.64 308.96

5 Piparadi 227.00 43.00

2.20 1.35 273.55


- 30 -

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. No. Village Benefit type 1 Woodlot Benefit type 2

Animal

fodder

Benefit type

3 Others Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Babarkot -- -- -- -- -- -- --

2 Bodi -- -- -- -- -- -- --

3 Kaniyad -- -- -- -- -- -- --

4 Limboda -- -- -- -- -- -- --

5 Piparadi -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational Distribution)

Sr.

No. Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH

Casual

labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Babarkot 147 92 82 174 12 7 2 44

2 Bodi 346 278 200 478 65 5 3 8

3 Kaniyad 653 600 357 957 40 10 3 47

4 Limboda 364 328 183 511 28 13 12 9

5 Piparadi 397 280 180 460 22 18 12 17


- 31 -

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics.

These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high

incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed

development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Kaniyad Project

consists of Five micro- watersheds namely 5G2C6m1a, 5G2C6m1b, 5G2C9c1g, 5G2C9c1h & 5G2C9a2d as their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey

includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the

demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net-consumption

rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area,

crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.


- 32 -

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post- withdrawal

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the

villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local

vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given

proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil Erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to

identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.


- 33 -

c) Hydrological modeling

Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model

overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human

error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP Projects

S.

No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used

Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach √

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute √

Baseline survey √

Hydro-geological survey √

Contour mapping

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) √

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover √

Ridge to Valley treatment √

Online IT connectivity between -

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP √

(2) DRDA and SLNA √

(3) SLNA and DoLR √

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map √


- 34 -

2. Village boundaries √

3. Drainage √

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)

5. Land use √

6. Ground water status √

7. Watershed boundaries √

8. Activity √

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil

nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# √

Weather Station

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides √

2. Organic manures √

3. Vermi compost √

4. Bio-fertilizer √

5. Water saving devices √

6. Mechanized tools/ implements √

7. Bio-fencing √

8. Nutrient budgeting √

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers √

Any other (please specify)


- 35 -

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee Details

It is a Committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the

village. This Committee is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the Chairman of the

Watershed Committee with Secretary who will be a paid functionary.

WDT Member is also a Member of Watershed Committee. There will be a separate bank account for Watershed Project Fund.

Money can be debited by joint signatures of the Nodal Officer (PIA representative) & the President or the Secretary of Watershed

Committee. The Watershed Committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the Project Implementation Period. Details of the

Committees formed in the Project Villages are as below:

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Table no. 31 A: Watershed Committee Details - Babarkot

Sr.

No. Name

Date of

Registration

as a Society Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF

Land

-less UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Edu.

qualifi-

cation

Functio

n/s

assigned

#

1 Kanubhai Hathibhai President M Y Y Y Yes 8

2 Shivrajbhai Lakhubhai Secretary M - Y - - Y - Y - Yes - S.Y.B.A. -


- 36 -

3 Kanuben Baldevbhai

Member F Y - - - - Y - - - - Uneduca

ted -

4 Kuvarben Manjibhai Member F - Y -

- - Y Y - - -

Uneduca

ted -

5 Shardaben Laghubhai Member F - Y - - - Y - - - Uneduca

ted -

6 Shantuben Laghubhai Member F - Y - - - Y Y - - Uneduca

ted -

7 Vajabhai Talshibhai Member M Y - - - Y Y - - - 10 -

8 Pratapbhai Bojaiya Member M - Y - - - Y Y - - - 5 -

9 Khimdas Asharambhai Member M - Y Y - - -- Y - - - 8 -

10 Nodal Officer PIA M - - - - - - - -- - Y - -

11 Project Leader WDT M - - - - - - - - - Y - -

Table no. 31 B: Watershed Committee Details – Bodi

Sr.

No. Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a society

Designation

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG

GP Any

other

Edu. qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

1 Pratapbhai Antubhai President M Y Y Y 10 2 Rajubhai Mashrubhai Secretary M Y Y Y 12

3 Shantibhai Ranchhodbhai

Member M Y Y Y Y 7

4 Valjibhai Ravjibhai Member M Y Y Y Y An

Educational

5 Narayanbhai Ramabhai Member M Y Y Y 4

6 Rajuben Chaturbhai Member F Y Y Y An

Educati


- 37 -

onal

7 Rajuben Hakabhai Member F Y Y Y An

Educational

8 Labhuben Ramjubhai Member F Y Y Y 4

9 Madhuben Mohanbhai Member F Y Y Y 10

10 Nodal Officer PIA M Y

11 Project Leader WDT M Y

Table no. 31 C: Watershed Committee Details - Kaniyad

Sr.

No. Names of WCs

Date of

Registratio

n as a

Society

Designatio

n

M/

F SC ST SF MF LF

Land

-less UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Edu.

qualifi-

cation

Function/

s

assigned#

1 Bhupatbhai Chikabhai President M Y Y Y 6

2 Manubhai Boghabhai Secretary M Y Y Y Y 5

3 Polabhai Sagrambhai Member M Y Y Y Y 2

4 Vallabhbhai Jerambhai Member M Y

Y Y 2

5 Vipulbhai Kanabhai Member M Y Y Y Y 2

6 Sureshbhai Rukhadbhai Member M Y Y Y T.Y.B.A.

7 Labhuben Bijalbhai Member F Y Y Y Y An


- 38 -

Educati

onal

8 Gauvriben Kanubhai Member F Y Y Y 2

9 Savitaben Dilipbhai Member F Y Y Y 4



Table no. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Limboda

Sr.

No

.

Names of WCs

Date of

Registratio

n as a

Society)

Designati

on

M

/

F

SC ST SF MF LF Land

-less UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Educa-

tional

qualifi-

cation

Function

/s

assigned

#

1 Iswarbhai Bachubhai President M Y Y Y 10

2 Mirabhai Mohanbhai Secretary M Y Y Y 5

3 Polabhai Hirabhai Member M Y Y Y 5

4 Kalubhai Talshibhai Member M Y Y Y 7

5 Madhuben Velabhai Member M Y Y 7

6 Champaben Dayalbhai Member F Y Y Y

7 Manjuben Sadulbhai Member F Y Y Y


- 39 -

8 Panchabhai Lagharabhai Member M Y Y Y 5

9 Jilubhai Dadbhai Member M Y Y Y 5



Table no. 31 D: Watershed Committee Details – Piparadi

Sr.

No. Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a society

Designation

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG

GP Any

other

Edu. qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

1 Arvindbhai Motibhai Agola

President M

(Gen.)

Y Y 6

2 Shivrajbhai Babubhai Secretary M Y Y Y 6

3 Velabhai Bhikhabhai Member M Y Y Y Y Uneduc

ated

4 Bhikhabhai Raghavbhai Member M

(Gen.)

Y Y 6

5 Gitaben Dhanabhai Member F Y Y Y 10

6 Madhuben Shamjibhai Member F Y Y Y Uneduc

ated

7 Kanuben Harshadbhai Member F

(Ge Y Y 7


- 40 -

n.) 8 Becharbhai Bhikhabhai Member M Y Y Y T.Y.B.A.

9 Bhavanbhai Girdharbhai

Member M

(Gen.)

Y Y 5

10 Madhubhai Gordhanbhai

Member M Y Y Y Uneduc

ated

11 Gitaben Shaileshbhai Member F Y Y Y 8



SHG Formation Self Help Groups are formed of weaker section of the society. Community Mobilizer will play an important role in this activity.

The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small and marginal farmer

households, landless/asset less poor agricultural laborers, women, shepherds and SC/ST persons. These Groups shall be homogenous groups

having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed area for their livelihood. Each Self Help Group will be provided with

a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by DWDU.

Table No. 32 A: SHG Detail – Babarkot

Sr. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category With only Men

With only Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 - 4 - 4 (i) Landless - 28 28 - 8 8 - 24 24

(ii) SF - 9 9 - 2 2 - - - (iii) MF - 4 4 - 1 1 - - -


- 41 -

(iv) LF - 3 3 - - - - - -

Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 11 11 - 24 24

Table no. 32 B: SHG Detail - Bodi

S. No.




With only Women

With both


1 - 4 - 4

(i) Landless - 15 15 - 8 8 - 5 5

(ii) SF - 12 12 - 1 1 - 2 2

(iii) MF - 14 14 - 1 1 - 3 3

(iv) LF - 3 3 - - - - -

Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 10 10 - 10 10

Table No. 32 C: SHG Detail-Kaniyad

S. No.




With only Women

With both


1 - 4 - 4

(i) Landless - 14 14 - 10 10 - 13 13

(ii) SF - 18 18 - 3 3 - - - (iii) MF - 12 12 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 15 15 - 13 13


- 42 -

Table No. 32 D: SHG Detail : Limboda

S. No.




With only Women

With both


1 - 4 - 4

(i) Landless - 32 32 - 7 7 - 5 5

(ii) SF - 8 8 - 3 3 - - - (iii) MF - 4 4 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 12 12 - 5 5

Table No. 32 E SHG Detail : Limboda

S. No.




With only Women

With both


1 - 4 - 4

(i) Landless - 17 17 - 9 9 - 8 8

(ii) SF - 12 12 - 4 4 - - - (iii) MF - 9 9 - 2 2 - - - (iv) LF - 6 6 - - - - - -

Total - 4 - 4 - 44 44 - 15 15 - 8 8

User Groups

The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in the watershed area with the help of WDT. These are homogenous

groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the watershed areas. Each User


- 43 -

Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or activity. The Watershed Committee

(WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups based on the principles of equity and

sustainability.

Table No. 33 A: UG Detail- Babarkot

S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 14 - 4 18

(i) Landless 25 10 35 13 3 16 12 7 19

(ii) SF 20 5 25 4 2 6 - - -

(iii) MF 17 3 20 - - - - - -

(iv) LF 6 4 10 - - - - - -

Total 14 - 4 18 68 22 90 17 5 22 12 7 19

Table No. 33 B: UG Detail- Bodi





1 14 - 4 18

(i) Landless 20 10 30 8 4 12 10 5 15

(ii) SF 40 15 55 5 3 8 5 3 8

(iii) MF 24 10 34 7 3 10 7 3 10

(iv) LF 4 3 7 - - - - - -

Total 14 - 4 18 88 38 126 20 10 30 22 11 33

Table No. 33 C: UG Detail - Kaniyad





1 12 - 4 16 (i) Landless 25 10 35 8 3 11 7 8 15

(ii) SF 36 18 54 3 1 4 - - -


- 44 -

(iii) MF 18 13 31 4 1 5 - - -

(iv) LF 5 3 8 - - - - - -

Total 12 - 4 16 84 44 128 15 5 20 7 8 15

Table No. 33 D: UG Detail – Limboda





1 26 - 4 30

(i) Landless 58 38 93 14 4 18 8 3 11

(ii) SF 20 10 30 2 1 3 - - -

(iii) MF 15 8 23 4 - 4 - - -

(iv) LF 4 - 4 - - - - - - Total 26 - 4 30 97 53 150 20 5 25 8 3 11

Table No. 33 E: UG Detail- Piparadi





1 20 - 4 24

(i) Landless 45 25 70 12 5 17 16 14 30

(ii) SF 25 10 35 8 2 10 17 3 20

(iii) MF 15 5 20 3 - 3 8 2 10

(iv) LF 16 3 19 - - - - - - Total 20 - 4 24 101 46 144 23 7 30 41 19 60

Entry Point Activity:

Entry Point Activity is an important work for Project Implementation Agency (PIA), which will help them to establish relationship with village

people and step in to the village. So Entry Point Activity should be selected very carefully which will give benefit to all village people. Success of any

project depends on involvement of local community. Villagers are the important stake holders who will be directly benefited from the project. Entry


- 45 -

Point Activity is done during first phase of the Project. It is done to solve immediate problem of the village and create good impression & feeling so the

villager support the Watershed Project & it can be run successfully.

Improved Crematoria

As per the Hindu tradition after death the mortal remains of a human are confined to the holy fire "The Agni". Traditionally wood and dung cakes are

used to cremate the dead body. In a traditional arrangement adopted for cremation normally about 250 to 300 kilos of wood besides a few kilos of dung

cakes are consumed per dead body - meaning each dead body needs about 5 to 6 times its weight of wood for its cremation. As a result annually lakhs of tons

of wood is destroyed for this inevitable activity. It is estimated that in Gujarat annually over 2 lakhs trees are being cut down for providing wood for

cremation alone.

The Improved Crematoria developed in Gujarat exhibited a potential of saving about 40 to 50% of wood consumed for cremation. The activity, which

earlier required about 250 to 300 kilos, could now be accomplished with 140 to 160 kilos only. Hence a saving of 100 to 150 kilos of wood per cremation.

The solution is a simple pre-fabricated cremation bed against the traditional method in which the pyre is set directly on the floor.

PROMOTION OF EFFICIENT WOOD CREMATORIA IN GUJARAT

The Forest Department, Govt. of Gujarat and Gujarat Energy Development Agency have been promoting use of improved designs of Wood-based

Efficient Crematoria in Gujarat since last two decades. The two designs are pre-fabricated cradle-like iron structures designed to provide proper aeration for

efficient combustion.

DESIGN & TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION


- 46 -

The design being propagated by GEDA is built up of cast iron and mild-steel components and weighs about 430 kilos. The Forest design is fully caste

weighing around 750 to 800 kilos.

As shown in the sketch it is a cast iron cradle made up of cast iron (CI) sidebars and fire bars, supported by a heavy mild-steel (MS) frame structure.

The sidebars and fire bars are secured by heady duty bolts & nuts. The overall dimension of the crematoria is 1950 mm X 905 mm X 820 mm. Weight of cast

iron components is used is about 325 to 330 kilos and that of mild-steel is about 100 to 110 kilos. The total structure is laid on a PCC floor and can be either

grouted or secured using foundation bolts. The components of the crematoria are as listed below:

1.Side bars/plates CI 12 nos.

2.Fire bar/plates CI 8 nos.

3.Vertical Supports MS 6 nos.

4.Horizon. Supports MS 2 nos.

5.Nut/bolt sets MS 88 nos.


- 47 -

Table no.34 A- Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities

planned Estimated cost

Expected outcome

1 BABARKOT 6.90 Lac

Check dam Repairing 1.00 - Bathroom For Ladies 1.40 - Roof water Harvesting Structure in school

0.30 -

Animal Water Trough – 2 3.02 Improved Crematoria 1.18 -

2 BODI 2.11 Lac. Pond Repairing 1.00 - Animal Water Trough -1 1.11 -

3 KANIYAD 7.51 Lac.

Bathroom For Ladies 1.50 - Check Wall 2.00 - Improved Crematoria 0.18 - Roof water Harvesting Structure in school

0.31 -


- 48 -

Animal Water Trough – 2 3.02 - RO Plants 0.50

4 LIMBODA 4.53 Lac.

Animal Water Trough – 2 2.50 Pond Repairing 1.43 Roof water Harvesting Structure in school

0.30

Improved Crematoria 0.30

5

PIPARADI

4.25 Lac

Check dam Repairing 0.80 Animal Water Trough – 1 1.55 Pond Repairing 1.25 Roof water Harvesting Structure

0.30

Improved Crematoria 0.35

Table No. 35: Details of Activities of Preparatory Phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Name of villages

Initiation of

village level

institution

Capacity

building IEC activities

Baseline

survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying

technical

support

agencies

Report

Preparation

&

Stationary

Estimated

Cost (Rs. in

lakh)

1 Babarkot 0.24 0.35 0.24 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.73

2 Bodi 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.10 0.7 0.5 0.10 0.50

3 Kaniyad 0.24 0.35 0.24 0.40 0.25 0.20 0.20 1.88

4 Limboda 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.19 1.13

5 Piparadi 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.17 1.06

#One of the following may be entered in columns: (i) Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started


- 49 -

Surface Water Storage Structure

Check dams

Check dams are constructed across small streams having slope the selected should have sufficient thickness of permeable bed or

weathered formation to facilitate recharge of stored water within short span of time. The water stored in these structures is mostly confined to

stream course and the height is normally less than 2m and excess water is allowed to flow over the wall in order to avoid scouring from excess

runoff water cushions are provided at downstream side. To harness the maximum run off in the stream series of such check dams are to be

constructed to have recharge on regional scale in project villages.

Table no.36 A : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Babarkot

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -

(iv) Check dam - - - 14 448 Hac. 128 mcft. 46.52 Lac. 448 Hac. 128 mcft 46.52 Lac.

(v) Percolation tank - - - - - - - - - -

(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -

(vii) Any others (Please specify)

- - - - - - - - - -

BODI

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -


- 50 -

(iv) Check dam - - - 5 8.72 Hac. 22 mcft. 8.46 Lac. 8.72 Hac. 22 mcft 8.46 Lac.


(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - -

KANIYAD

(i) Tank - - - - - - - - - -

(ii) Pond - - - - - - - - - -

(iii ) Lake - - - - - - - - - -

(iv) Check dam - - - 20 640 Hac. 185 mcft. 49.12 Lac. 640 Hac. 185 mcft 49.12 Lac.


(vi) Channel - - - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - - - -

LIMBODA

(i) Tank

(ii) Pond

(iii ) Lake

(iv) Check dam - - - 17 274 Hac. 110 mcft. 32.87 Lac. 274 Hac. 110 mcft. 32.87 Lac.

(v) Percolation tank

(vi) Channel


PIPARADI

(i) Tank

(ii) Pond

(iii ) Lake

(iv) Check dam 6 110 Hac. 47.50 Mts.

13.31 110 Hac. 47.50 Mts.

13.31


(vi) Channel



- 51 -

Table no.36 : Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 IWMP-1

(i) Tank

(ii) Pond

(iii ) Lake

(iv) Check dam 62 1418.22

Hac. 492.50

mts 150.28 Lac.

1418.22 Ha.

492.50 mts

150.28 Lac.



Sub Total 62 1418.22 492.50 150.28 1418.22 492.50 150.28

Well Recharge Structure

As 80% of Irrigation done trough ground water, recharging of ground water is very important aspect. Artificial Recharge Of Groundwater through Dugwell is

centrally sponsored scheme. NABARD is providing subsidy of Rs 4200 to small & Marginal Farmers while Rs 2100 Large Farmers. This Scheme is being implemented

in Botad Taluka. So Cluster village people also harness benefit of the scheme.


- 52 -

Table No. 37.: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in the Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of

existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost

1 Babarkot (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64

Total for the village


- 53 -

2 Bodi (i)Open wells 10 30 0.82 30 0.82


3 Kaniyad (i)Open wells 30 90 2.46 90 2.46


4 Limboda (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64


5 Piparadi (i)Open wells 20 60 1.64 60 1.64


Total

Table no. 38 ctivities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ( 10 % Estimate)

S. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from

activity per SHG

1 BABARKOT

Horticultural Nursery 2 Group, 1.25 Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.50 Cattle Food 1 Group 1.00 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.50

2 BODI

Horticultural Nursery 1 Group 1.15 Cattle Food 1 Group 0.90 Cutlery Imitation 1 Group 1.25 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.00

3 KANIYAD Cattle Food 1 Group, 1.10 Horticultural Nursery 2 Group 1.50 Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.20


- 54 -

Dimond Polishing 2 Group 2.00

4 LIMBODA

Horticultural Nursery 1 Group, 1.25 Cutlery Imitation 1 Group, 1.60 Mandap Service 1 Group 1.40 Senting Group 1 Group 1.00

5 PIPARADI Cutlery Imitation 2 Group 1.20 Flor Maill 1 Group 0.80 Diamond Polishing 1 Group, 2.00

Table No. 39: Other Activities of Watershed Works Phase – Proposed Target

S. No.

Name of villages

Ridge area treatment

Drainage line treatment

Nursery raising

Land development

Crop demonstrations

Pasture development

Fishery development

Non-conventional

energy

Any other (please specify)

Total Estimated cost (Rs. In

lakhs) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) 1 Babarkot 19 53.77 91 11.77 65.54 2 Bodi 5 8.46 58 7.00 15.46 3 Kaniyad 20 48.42 125 25.20 73.62 4 Lomboda 17 32.87 96 10.20 13.50 56.57 5 Piparadi 6 13.31 238 20.08 13.73 6.00 53.12 264.31

(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)

Farm bund

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on

farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In such a

situation, it becomes inconvenient to bullocks for operations such as ploughing and line-sowing.


- 55 -

Table No.40: Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed Works*-

Sr.

No.

Village

Name Name of Structures

Type of Treatment Type of Land Executing

Agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(D)

(iii)

Land

dev. (L)

(i)

Pri-vate

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl.

specify)

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Babarkot

Field Bund 76 4.07 *

Field Outlet 26 3.81 *


- 56 -

Land Levelling 25 3.00

Any Others

2 Bodi

Field Bund 127 3.90


Any Others

3 Kaniyad

Field Bund 220 14.26

Field Outlet 10 2.00


Any Others

4 Limboda

Field Bund 41 6.06


Any Others

5 Piparadi

Field Bund 138 10.56

Field Outlet 49 4.88


Any Others

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

Table No. 41.1: Details of Activities Connected with Vegetative Cover in Watershed Works

Sr.

No.

Name of

Village

Name of structure/

work

Type of

treatment Type of land

Executing

agency Target


- 57 -

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

Area

(ha)

No.

of

plant

s

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1 Babarkot

Afforestation L 4.00 6000 12.00

Wire Fencing L P C 5 Km. - 5.00

Gram Vatika L 0.16 550 1.00

Well Recharge

Structure L P C 20 20 1.62

Pasture Dev. L 2.00 - 2.00

2 Bodi




Well Recharge



3 Kaniyad




Well Recharge



4 Limboda Afforestation L 2.00 3000 6.00



- 58 -


Well Recharge



5 Piparadi




Well Recharge



Table No.42: Details of Allied / Other Activities

For Micro Enterprise & Production System

Sr.

No.

Name of

village Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii) Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1

Babarkot

Crop demonstration- 10 - - WC/Others 7.50 *

Cattle camp- All Villegers - - WC 3.00 *

Chaff cutter 200 - - WC 2.00 *

Electrical Pump 20 WC 0.50 *


- 59 -

Cotton Clamp 200 WC 1.00 *

Organic Furtilizer & Seed Shop

1 - - wc 1.00 *

Cotton Processing Machine 1 - - WC 1.50 *

Well Cleanning Divece 1 - - WC 1.00 *

Horticultural Plants 200 - - WC 1.26 *

Revolving fund 5 Group - - WC 0.70 *

For Asset less People

Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre)

3 Groups SHG 5.00 *

Imitation 2 Groups SHG 1.00 *

Vermi compost 5 Person WC 2.00 *

Sewing Machine 5 Person WC 1.00 *

Cattle Food 1 Groups SHG 2.47 *

Animal husbandry 3 UG UG 2.00 *

Mandap Service 1 Groups SHG 1.00 *

Diamond polishing UG UG 1.00 *

Gobar Gas Plants 30 Person WC 3.00 *

Senting UG UG 1.00 *

Hand trolley 18 Persons WC 0.50 *

2 Bodi

Crop Demonstration 5 - - WC 2.50 *

Cattle Camp-3 10 - - WC 0.75 *



- 60 -

Revolving Fund 5 Groups - - WC 0.70 *


Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre)

3 Groups SHG 2.50 *



Senting Group UG UG 0.50 *

Gobar Gas Plants Personal UG 0.35 *

Sowing Machine 1 WC 0.50 *

Well Cleaning Divice 1 WC 0.82 *

Chaff Cutter 25 UG 0.25

3

Kaniyad


Cattle Camp 4 - - WC 3.00 *


Revolving Fund 5 - - WC 0.70 *

Chaff Cutter 400 - - WC 2.00 *

Cotton Clamp 200 Personal WC 1.00 *


Cattle Food 1 UG, 1 Groups UG/ SHG 2.47 *

Nursery(Cottan, Vegitable, Horticulutre

3 Groups SHG 5.00 *


Vermi Compost 5 persons WC 3.00 *

Animal Husbandry 2 UG UG 2.00 *

Mandap Service 2 UG, UG 1.00 *


- 61 -

Diamond Polishing SHG SHG 1.50 *

Gobar Gas Plants 30 Person UG 3.00 *

Electical Pump UG UG 0.50 *

Sewing Machine 10 Persons WC 1.00 *

Well Cleaning Divice 1 WC 1.50 *

Drip Irrigation 5 WC 0.25 *

Cotton processing Machine 1 WC 1.50 *

Organic Fertilizer & Seed Shop

1 WC 1.49 *


Hand trolley 21 Persons WC 0.50 *

4 Limboda


Cattle Camp-5 5 - - WC 2.00 *



Chap Cutter 400 - - WC 0.50 *

Agarbati Udyog SHG SHG 0.25 *

Cotton Clamp 200 Persons UG 1.00 *


Cattle Food 1 UG UG 1.73 *


1 Groups SHG 4.00 *

Cutlery Imitation 1 Groups SHG 0.34 *

Vermi compost 5 persons WC 1.00 *

Animal Husbandry 2 UG UG 1.50 *


- 62 -


Medicine Pump UG UG 0.50 *


Drip Irrigationg 1 WC 1.00 *

Cotton Prossesing Machine 1 wC 1.50 *

Well Cleaning Device 1 WC 1.00 *

Senting Group 1 Groups SHG 1.00 *

5 Piparadi Crop Demonstration 2 - - WC 3.00 *

Cattle Camp-10 10 - - WC 2.00 *



Chaff Cutter UG - - UG 0.50 *

Cotton Clamp 100 Persons UG 1.00 *

Agarabati Udyog SHG SHG 0.50 *


Cattle Food UG UG 1.73 *


2 UG UG 3.00 *

Cutlery Imitation 2 Groups SHG 0.50 *

Vermi compose 10 Persons WC 2.00 *

Animal Husbandry UG UG 2.00 *

Mandap Service UG UG 1.00 *

Gobar Gas Plants 4 Persons UG 1.00 *

Medicine Pump UG UG 0.50 *


- 63 -



Cotton Prossessing Machine 1 WC 1.50 *

Well Cleaning Machine 1 WC 1.00 *

Note: Remaining amount will be taken as people’s contribution towards their benefit

BCR Analysis For Animal Husbandry

Fixed Cost Cost of milch animals 90,000

Cost Of sheds 85000

Insurance Cost 3000

Milk Cans 3000

Weighing Scale 2000

Miscellaneous 15000

Total 198,000

Variable Cost

Fodder cost (10x5x3x365) 82125


- 64 -

Conc. Feed (4.5 kg/day/animal for 30 days)

25000

Total 107125

Grand Total 305,125

Life Of Project 7 yrs 7

Average Annual Cost 28285.7

Total Annual Cost 135411

Income Selling of Milk (10 litx3 Nos x210 days @ 35 Rs/lt 220500

Selling cowdung 14400

Total 234900

B/C Ratio 1.734722

Financial Analysis for Mandap Services

Sr. No. Item Number/Quantity Cost

1 Bamboos 400 16000

2 Cotton cloths to tie on floor (20X30) 600 sq. m. 20000

3 Jute carpet on ground 600 sq. m. 8900

4 Bed, pillow, bed sheet 50 pairs 25000

5 Utensils for cooking food for 300 people 75000

6 Wedding decorated set 1 set 7500


- 65 -

7 Wedding chair 1 set 4000

8 Folding ladder 2 1800

9 Hand operated cart 1 5000

10 Tube lights 40 Nos. 8000

11 Decorative light 4500

12 ceiling and pedestal fan 10 10000

13 Wear & Tear 10000

Total 195700

1 Project Life (Years) 7

2 Average Annual Cost 27957

3 Avarage Annual Income ( 50 days per year) 150000

4 BCR 5.37

Table No.43: Details of Activities in the CPRs in the Project Areas

Sr. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the

activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure

(Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Babarkot

Gam Tal Gram Vatika 0.16 1.00 All Villagers

Waste Land Afforestation 4.00 12.73 All Villagers

Pasture Land Pasture Development 5.00 2.00 All Villagers

2 Bodi





- 66 -

3 Kaniyad




4 Limboda




5 Piparadi




Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution

Capacity building is a continuous process. As a stake holder of Watershed Program should know how to use preserved natural resources, use of

assets created under watershed program in sustainable manner, so all the stake holders including PIA, WDT, WC, SHG ,UG & village community needs to be

trained for that. Various NGOs & Government Institutes are ready to do this work. But at grass root level Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) has to deliver well as

they have one of the best extension wing. KVK situated in Bhimadad village of GadhadaTaluka, which is located in the project area. SPIPA & DSC will train

PIA & WDT for proper implementation of program, while BIAF & VRTI will work for animal Husbandry & Community Mobilization.

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Training

Institute

Full Address with

contact no., website

& e-mail

Type of

Institute#

Area(s) of

speciali-

zation$

Accreditation

details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of trainings

assigned

No. of trainees

to be trained

Development

Support Centre Ahmedabad NGO

Capacity

Building Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 20 10

BISAG Gandhinagar Space GIS, Remote GoG 2010-2013 8 10


- 67 -

Application Sensing

VRTI – Kutch Bhavnagar NGO Capacity

Building Society Reg. Act 2010-2014 30 500

BIAF Vadodara NGO Animal

Husbandry Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 10 250

SPIPA Ahmedabad State Govt. Administration GoG 2010-2014 10 10

KVK Sanosara –

Bhavnagar

Research

Institute Agriculture GoI 2010-2014 30 500

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/

livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)

Table No. 45: Capacity Building Plan

Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of persons to be

trained

No. of training

programmes Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

DWDU Members 5 5 8 2.50

PIA 2 2 10 2.00

WDT 5 5 10 4.50

UGs 106 106 10 6.00

SHGs 20 20 20 7.74

WCs 11 11 5 5.00

GPs 7 7 1 0.88

Community 10000 1500 10 3.00


- 68 -

Others

(Pl. specify)

Total 10156 10156 20312 31.62

Table No.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities

Sr. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Agriculture and Animal

Extention KVK 2.00 -

BUDGET

Table No. 47: Budget at a Glance for the Project

Sr. No. Budget Component Cost Requirement

1 Administrative Costs 63.22

2 Monitoring 6.33

3 Evaluation 6.33

4 Entry Point Activity 25.30

5 Institution and Capacity Building 31.62

6 Detailed Project Report 6.33

7 Watershed Development Works 316.17

8 Livelihood Activities for Asset-less 63.22

9 Production Systems and Micro-Enterprises 82.20


- 69 -

10 Consolidation Phase 31.62

TOTAL 632.34

Table No. 48: Village-wise - Component-wise Budget Available under IWMP

Sr.

No. Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB

DPR Watershed

development

Work

Livelihood

for asset

less

Production

system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Babarkot 6.90 8.63 1.73 86.27 17.25 22.43 8.63

2 Bodi 2.11 2.64 0.53 26.36 5.27 6.85 2.64

3 Kaniyad 7.51 9.38 1.88 93.85 18.77 24.40 9.38

4 Limboda 4.53 5.66 1.13 56.57 11.31 14.71 5.66

5 Piparadi 4.25 5.31 1.06 53.12 10.62 13.81 5.31

Total 25.3 31.62 6.33 316.17 63.22 82.2 31.62


- 70 -

Table No. 49: Village-wise Gap in Funds Requirement

Sr.

No.

Village Total cost

requirement

Total funds available under

IWMP

Gap in funds

requirement

1 Babarkot 183.91 172.54 11.37

2 Bodi 57.87 52.72 5.15

3 Kaniyad 203.12 187.69 15.43

4 Limboda 123.79 113.14 10.65

5 Piparadi 111.89 106.25 5.64

Total 675.26 632.34 42.92

Table No.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with Other Schemes

Sr. No. Village Activity to be

carried out

Fund made

available to IWMP

due to convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took

place

Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

1 Babarkot

Afforstration 0.73 Forest Dep. Dist. Level

Field Bund 3.89 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Nursury ( Cotton,

Vagitable,

Horticulture)

1.00 Forest

Dist. Level

Horticuture Plants 0.74 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level

Drip Irrigation 4.75 GGRC State Level


- 71 -

Roof Water

Harvesting

Structure

0.26 Wasmo Wasmo

2 Bodi Field Bund 2.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Wire Fencing 2.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Cattal Camp & Arti.

Insimitation

0.75 Animal Hus. Dist. Level

Gobar Gas Plants 0.40 Animal Hus. Dist . Level

3 Kaniyad

Fuild Bund 8.94 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Nursury ( Cotton,

Vagitable,

Horticulture)

1.00 Forest

Dist. Level

Horticuture Plants 0.74 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level


4

Limboda

Roof Water

Harvesting

Structure

0.26 Wasmo Wasmo


Animal Husbondary 0.50 Horticulture Dep. Dist. Level

Field Bund 4.14 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Land Leveling 1.00 MGNREGA Taluka Level

Mandap Decoration 1.00 SGSY Taluka Level

Imitation Jwelery 0.75 SGSY Taluka Level

5 Piparadi Mandap Decoration 1.00 SGSY Taluka Level

Fuild Bund 5.64 MGNREGA Taluka Level


- 72 -

Table No. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects

S. No.

Name of

Private Sector

Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership

Interventions

Expected

Outcomes Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any other

(pl. specify) IWMP

Private

sector

---NIL---

OUTCOMES

The villages already get benefit of MGNREGA. However IWMP project has special fund allocation for asset-less people as well as micro-enterprise &

production system, which enable village community towards sustainable source of income i.e. self employment. The project will not only ensure

employment but also promote micro-enterprise which will create various sources of income other than agriculture & also make agriculture more profitable.

Priority will be given to weaker section of the society i.e. women, BPL & SC/ST. However no ST population resides in the project area.


- 73 -

Table No. 52: Employment in Project Area:

Sr.

No.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others* Women Total

1 Babarkot 510 0 11353 6524 11863 30 0 668 384 698 6 0 134 84 140

2 Bodi 2210 0 25359 15163 27569 130 0 1492 892 1622 26 0 298 195 324

3 Kaniyad 1819 0 61928 35061 63747 107 0 3643 2062 3750 21 0 729 450 750

4 Limboda 1173 0 19147 11223 20320 69 0 1126 660 1195 14 0 225 144 239

5 Piparadi 5695 0 18695 13414 24390 335 0 1100 789 1435 67 0 220 172 287

* Asset-less villagers

Table No. 53: Details of Seasonal Migration from Project Area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Babarkot 100 25 6 Months 2 Months

2 Bodi 75 30 3 to 6 Months 3 Months

3 Kaniyad 30 7 3 to 6 Months 3 Months

4 Limboda 70 35 3 to 6 Months 3 Months

5 Piparadi 65 25 3 Months 2 Months


- 74 -

Table No. 54: Details of Average Ground-Water-Table Depth in the Project Areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level(m) Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)(m)

1 Babarkot Open Well, Bore Well

30 to 45 5 (Increase)

2 Bodi Open Well, Bore Well


3 Kaniyad Open Well, Bore Well


4 Limboda Open Well, Bore Well


5 Piparadi Open Well, Bore Well


Table No. 55: Status of Drinking Water

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year)

Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post

project Pre-project

Expected Post-

project

1 Babarkot 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable

2 Bodi 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable

3 Kaniyad 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable

4 Limboda 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable

5 Piparadi 8 to 10 12 Months Impure Potable


- 75 -

Table No. 56: Details of Kharif Crop Area and Yield in the Project Areas

Name of village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area

(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area

(ha)

Average Yield per

ha (qtl)

Babarkot Cottan 650.00 228.00 600.00 187.20

Bodi Cottan 536.00 167.24 470.00 146.64

Kaniyad Cottan 960.00 299.52 880.00 274.56

Limboda Cottan 664.00 207.16 590.00 184.08

Piparadi Cottan 575.00 179.40 475.00 148.20

Project total 3385.00 1081.32 3015 940.68


- 76 -

Table No. 57: Area under Horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP

1 Babarkot - 7

2 Bodi - 5

3 Kaniyad - 12

4 Limboda - 17

5 Piparadi - 15

Table No. 58: Forest/Vegetative Cover

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Babarkot 38.82 10

2 Bodi 11.86 8

3 Kaniyad 42.23 10

4 Limboda 25.46 8

5 Piparadi 23.19 10


- 77 -

Table No. 59: Details of Livestock in the Project Areas

(for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of

Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Babarkot Milking-Animals 172 688 20640 190 1140 39900

2 Bodi Milking-Animals 607 2428 72840 649 3894 136290

3 Kaniyad Milking-Animals 794 3176 95280 830 4980 174300

4 Limboda Milking-Animals 487 1948 58440 941 5646 197610

5 Piparadi Milking-Animals 414 1656 49680 450 2700 94500

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward Linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

IWMP-1

Backward linkages For Animal Husbandry

Fodder Development 0 5 10

Animal feed Storage 0 2 5

Cattle Camp 0 25 25

Financial Support for Animal Husbandry 0 10 10

Forward Linkages for Animal Husbandry

Milk Production 4 5 10

Milk Collection Centre 1 5 5

Milk Processing 0 4 8


- 78 -

Market Linkage 0 5 5

Backward Linkage For Agriculture

Vermi Compost 0 25 50

Nurseries 0 5 5

Farm Machineries 2 5

Water supply

Seed Supply 0 3 3

Credit institutions 1 2 5

Forward linkages For Agriculture

Harvesting/threshing machinery

Agro and other Industries 1 7 8

Market Link up 0 4 8


- 79 -

Maps


- 80 -


- 81 -


- 82 -


- 83 -


- 84 -


- 85 -


- 86 -


- 87 -

Action Plan Maps


- 88 -


- 89 -


- 90 -


- 91 -


- 92 -

Documents

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Bhavnagar/IWMP1.pdf · DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ... Bhavnagar is appointed as ... for one hundred days