DETAILED PROJECT REPORTmizorural.nic.in/file/IWMP/ACTION PLAN/Action Plan... · INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME (IWMP) DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF LUNGLEI – III (LOWER

INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME(IWMP)

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

OF

LUNGLEI – III (LOWER PHAIRUANGLUI)

WATERSHED PROJECT

Prepared by

The Block Development Officer : Rural Development Block Lungsen

Detailed Project Report | 1

IWMP: Lunglei – III Watershed Project PIA: BDO, Lungsen

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5

CHAPTER 2: PROJECT BACKGROUND____________________________________________________________613

2.1: Location

Table No. 1: Basic Project Information.

2.2: Need of Watershed Development Programme

Table No. 2: Weightage of the Project

2.3: Other Developmental Project/schemes running in the Project Area

Table No. 3 Developmental Projects/schemes running in the Project Area

2.4: Previous watershed programme in the Project Area

Map No. 1: Location Map of Lunglei IWMP ‐ III

Map No. 2: Watershed Map of Lunglei District

CHAPTER 3: BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA 1422

3.1: Geography and Geo‐hydrology

3.1.2: Soil and Topography:

3.1.3: Soil Classification:

3.1.4: Land and Agriculture:

Table No. 4: Land‐use Pattern in the Project Area

Table No. 5: Agro Climatic Condition

Table No. 6: Flood and Drought in the Project Area

Table No. 7: Soil erosion in the Project Area

3.2: Socio‐Economic Profile

3.2.1: Demographic and Ethnographic Status:

Table No. 8: Demography and Land Distribution

3.2.2 Socio‐Economic Condition

3.3: Livelihood Pattern

Table No. 9: Summary of Livelihoods



CHAPTER 4: PROJECT APPROACH AND STRATEGIES 2326

4.1: Opportunities for intervention

4.2: Implementation Approach and Methodology

4.3: Convergence Strategy

CHARTER 5: PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 2728

5.1: Project objectives

5.2: Project Core Values

CHAPTER 6: BUDGETING 29

6.1: Budgeting and Budget Components

Table No. 10: Budget at a glance

CHAPTER 7: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT COMPONENTS AND ACTIVITIES 3081

7.1: Scientific Planning

7.2: Institutional Set up & Organization of community

7.2.:1 Community Institution building

Table No. 11: List of existing Self Help Groups in the Project Area

7.2.2: Capacity Building

Table No.12: Capacity Building Plan

7.3: Physical activities to be undertaken

7.3.1: Entry Point Activity (EPA)

Table No. 13: Entry Point Activities (EPA)

7.3.2: Detailed Cost Estimates for works taken up under Entry Point Activities (EPA)

Table No. 14: Cost Estimate for construction of Water Harvesting Tank

Table No. 15: Cost Estimate for construction of Public Urinal

Table No. 16: Cost Estimate for construction of Agriculture link road

Table No. 17: Cost Estimate for construction of Resting Shed

7.3.3. Natural Resources Management

Table No. 18: Model Technical Specification of Stone Bund

Table No. 19: Cost Estimation for Bund

Table No. 20: Model Technical Specification of Staggered Contour Trenches Table

No. 21: Cost Estimation of Staggered Contour Trenches

Table No. 22: Model Technical Specification of Bordered Contour Trenches

Table No. 23: Cost Estimation for Bordered Contour Trench



Table No. 24: Model Technical Specification for Afforestation

Table No. 25: Cost Estimation for Afforestation Activities.

Table No. 26: Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘A’

Table No. 27: Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘B’

Table No. 28: Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘C’

Table No. 29: Model Technical Details of Earthen Bund

Table No. 30: Cost Estimation for Earthen Bund (Per Unit)

Table No.31: Cost Estimate for Construction of Agriculture Link Road (per unit)

Table No. 32: Model Technical Details of Farm Pond (Per Unit)

Table No. 33: Cost Estimation of Farm Pond (Per Unit)

7.3.4: Activities under Farm Production System

Table No. 34: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Bamboo Cultivation

Table No. 35: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Passion fruit Cultivation

Table No. 36: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Arecanut Cultivation

Table No. 37: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Greenhouse farming

7.3.5: Activities under Livelihood Production System

Table No. 38: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Dairy farming

Table No. 39: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Poultry farming (Layer)

Table No. 40: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Poultry farming (Broiler)

Table No. 41: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Hill cattle/Methuen rearing

Table No. 42: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Goat/Sheep rearing

Table No. 43: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Pig rearing

Table No. 44: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Aquaculture

Table No. 45: Cost Estimation for a Vermi‐Compost Unit

Table No. 46: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Electronic goods servicing

Table No. 47: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Carpentry

Table No. 48: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Petty Trade

Table No. 49: Per Unit Cost‐benefit analyses for Tailoring

CHAPTER 8: PROJECT PHASING AND YEARWISE ACTION PLAN 8287

Table No. 50: Project Phasing Strategy

Table No. 51: Year Wise Action Plan

CHAPTER 9: CONSOLIDATION AND WITHDRAWAL MECHANISM 8893



CHAPTER 10: EXPECTED OUTCOMES 9498

8.1.1 Drinking water

Table No. 52: Status of Drinking Water

8.1.2 Migration

Table No. 53: Migration from the Project Area

8.1.3 Crops

Table No. 54: Major Crops grown and their productivity

8.1.4 Vegetative cover

8.1.5 Livestock

8.1.6 Linkages

8.1.7 Employment

Table No. 55: Employment Generation

8.1.8 Ground water table

Table No. 56: Ground Water Table depth in the Project Area.

CHAPTER 11: LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS 99101

CHAPTER 12: MONITORING AND EVALUATION 102103

CHAPTER 13: MAPPING 104140

Location Map

Lunglei District Watershed Map

Contour Map

Drainage Map

Elevation Map

Slope Map

Wasteland Map

ANNEXURES: 141150

Annexure I : Approval and Acceptance Certificates of Detailed Project Report

Annexure II : Memorandum of Understanding between Project Implementing

Agency and Watershed Committee, Phairuangkai

Annexure III : Memorandum of Understanding between Project Implementing

Agency and Watershed Committee, Rotlang ‘W’

Annexure IV : Memorandum of Understanding between Project Implementing

Agency and Watershed Committee, Runtung

Annexure V : Model Rules and Regulations of Society



Chapter – 1: Introduction

With a geographical area of about 21,087 Sq km and perched on the high hills of the

North Eastern part of the country, Mizoram has a very difficult terrain. Over 80% of the total

geographical area of the state is covered with steep hills. The percentage of rural population is

50.36 of which 20.56 % are poor. Broadly, the persistence of rural poverty is a result of

inadequate access to natural resources, over dependence on land, low productivity due to

inadequate use of technology, deficient infrastructure, inability of rural people engaged in

traditional occupational crafts to upgrade their skill, inaccessibility to agricultural land and

limited livelihood opportunities by the rural poor.

While 60.60% of population comprises of cultivators, agriculture & allied sectors

contribute only 16.7% of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP).This share is declining over

the years. Though agriculture is the mainstay of the state, only 5% of the total area is under

cultivation, of which only 11% is irrigated. The high dependence for livelihood on this sector,

with limited irrigation potential resulting only in single crop in major portions of the land,

suggests the need to explore options for income earning potential from this sector.

Again, the declining per capita land and fresh water availability coupled with soil erosion

and degrading land and water resources are posing serious threat to food, environmental, social

and economic security in the State. Land degradation due to soil erosion, low water use

efficiency, poor livestock productivity, lack of assured and remunerative marketing

opportunities and poor infrastructure are areas of important concerns. Sustainable development

of these rainfed areas, enhancement of their productivity with effective resource conservation

and use of improved rainfed technology is an urgent need. The challenge in rainfed Mizoram,

therefore, is to improve rural livelihoods through participatory watershed development with

focus on integrated farming systems for enhancing income, productivity and livelihood security

in a sustainable manner.

Therefore, the major objective behind the watershed development approach under the

“Integrated Watershed Management Programme” implemented by the Department of Land

Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India is to enhance and stabilize

production through improved technology and efficient use of natural resources for over all

development of land and inhabitants of the watershed.



Chapter2: Project Background

2.1 Location

Lunglei III Watershed Project is located within Lungsen Development Block in Lunglei

District of Mizoram. The Watershed consists of seven Micro‐watersheds viz. Lower Phairuanglui

– I, Lower Phairuanglui – II, Lower Phairuanglui – III, Lower Phairuanglui – VI, Lower

Phairuanglui – V, Lower Phairuanglui – VI, Lower Phairuanglui – VII coded as 3c3c4blc,

3c3c4c1a, 3c3c4b1b, 3c3c4c1c, 3c3c4d1a, 3c3c4c1d, 3c3c4d2d respectively. The area lies

between latitude of 22 47’ 23” to 22 51’ 53” N and longitude of 92 37’ 47” to 92 42’ 17”

E. The Project Area falls under the “Hilly area” as per the DoLR Classification. Total area of the

Watershed is about 5043 Ha, of which 5000 Ha has been undertaken to be treated under

Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The nearest town is Lunglei which is about 20 Km from Phairuangkai and is well

connected by pucca road. The watershed includes three villages of Phairuangkai, Rotlang W and

Runtung along the banks of the Phairuanglui River. The area is inhabited mostly by the Chakma,

Pang and Bru communities and they are the poorest and most backward communities in

Mizoram. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on primitive and rainfed agriculture,

animal husbandry and wage labour.



MAP – 1: LOCATION MAP OF LUNGLEI – III



MAP – 2: WATERSHED MAP OF LUNGLEI DISTRICT



Table 1: Basic Project Information.

2.2: Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters

namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal

farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water

situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land,

Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain

or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Lunglei

Watershed‐III Project as given in Table No. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 270, which is above 80% of the total

households of the village. Hence a score of 10 is allotted. The percentage of schedule tribes in the

1 Name of the Scheme/Programme Integrated Watershed Management Programme (I.W.M.P)

2 Name of the Project Lunglei III 3 Name and Code of Micro Watersheds Lower Phairuanglui – I: 3c3c4blc

Lower Phairuanglui – II: 3c3c4c1a Lower Phairuanglui – III: 3c3c4clb Lower Phairuanglui – IV: 3c3c4c1c Lower Phairuanglui – V: 3c3c4d1a Lower Phairuanglui – VI: 3c3c4dld Lower Phairuanglui – VII: 3c3c4d2d

4 Name of the Type of the Project Hilly 5 Names and Census Codes of Villages

Covered 1. Phairuangkai 00048500 2. Rotlang ‘W’ 00048600 3. Runtung 00055200

6 Name of the Block Lungsen 7 Name of the District Lunglei 8 Name of the State Mizoram 9 Basin/catchment/sub catchment Phairuang River 10 Latitude 22 47’ 23” to 22 51’ 53” 11 Longitude 92 37’ 47” to 92 42’ 17” 12 Total geographical area of the Project

(in ha.) 5043

13 Effective Project Area (in ha.) 5000 14 Total project cost (Rs. in lakh ) 750

15 Name of the P.I.A. Block Development Officer, Lungsen Rural Development Block



village is about 95 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. More than

80 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the

labour is less than the minimum wages and ground water status is critical hence a composite

rank of 5, 10 and 10 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area

is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is problematic in the village. The soil is very

permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely

irrigation. Lunglei III watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds and Cluster approach

was followed taking into consideration four micro‐watersheds covering a total area of 5000 Ha.

Thus all the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 112.5 to the watershed

(reference Table 2 below).

Table no. 2: Weightage of the Project Project Name

Project type

Weightage

Lunglei III

Hilly

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii

10 10 5 10 10 5 15 7.5 15 10 5 NA 10

Table no. 3: Criteria and Weightage for selection of watershed

Sl No.

Criteria Maximum score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10)

80 to 50 % (7.5)

50 to 20 % (5)

Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population

10 More than 40 % (10)

20 to 40 % (5)

Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10)

50 to 80 % (5)

Less than 50 % (3)



V Ground water status

5 Over exploited (5)

Critical (3) Sub critical (2)

Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 ‐66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

‐33.3 to ‐66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to ‐33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain‐fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15)

80 to 90 % (10)

70 to 80% (5)

Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10)

Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5)

Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High –above 20 % (15)

Medium –10 to 20 %

(10)

Low‐less than 10 % of TGA (5)

X Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low

production & where

productivity can be

significantly enhanced with

reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with


Lands with high

production & where

productivity can be

marginally enhanced with


xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/

treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated

watershed & contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project

(10)

Contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the

project but non

contiguous to

previously treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous

to previously treated

watershed nor

contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the

project (0)

2.2 Other Developmental Project/schemes running in the Project Area

Some of the important poverty reduction programmes implemented by Mizoram and the

progress of implementation is summarised below. These programmes include the Mahatma

Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Border Area Development

Programme (BADP), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY) and Indira Awaas Yojana



(IAY). All these schemes are centrally sponsored schemes, except for BADP which is a central

sector programme.

i). Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS)

The basic objective of National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) is to enhance

livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment

in a financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual

work. This work guarantee can also serve other objectives; generating productive assets,

protecting the environment, empowering rural women, reducing rural urban migration and

fostering social equity, among others. Construction of village extension roads, widening of

existing roads, retaining walls, culverts, RCC Bridges, Water Harvesting and Afforestation

activity has been taken‐up under MGNREGA.

ii). Border Area Development Programme (BADP):

The main objective of the BADP is to meet the special developmental needs of the people

living in remote and inaccessible areas situated near the international border and to bridge the

gap in the physical and social infrastructure of such areas. The aim is to transform the border

areas by ensuring multifaceted development and to saturate the border areas with the entire

essential infrastructure through convergence of schemes and participatory approach. This

programme is implemented in villages situated in International border viz. Indo–Bangladesh

border and Indo–Myanmar border. Two Community Halls, Concrete internal roads, Playgrounds

with Pavilions, Widening of Inter‐Village Road, Market Buildings, Public Bathrooms etc has been

constructed under this Programme in the Project Area.

iii). Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY)

The objective of SGSY is to bring the assisted poor families (Swarozgaris) above the

poverty line by ensuring appreciable increase in incomes over a period of time. This objective is

to be achieved by inter‐alia organizing the rural poor into Self Help Groups (SHGs) through a

process of social mobilization, their training and capacity building and provision of income‐

generating assets through a mix of bank credit and government subsidy. Families below the

Poverty Line (BPL) in rural areas constitute the target group of the SGSY. Within the target

group, special safeguards have been provided to vulnerable sections, by way of reserving 50%

benefits for SCs/STs, 40% for women and 3% for disabled persons.Two Self‐help Groups are

linked with bank subsidy of Rs 1,00,000/‐ each for animal husbandry and 4 individual

Swarozgaris of various trades have been assisted with subsidy of Rs.10,000/‐ each



iv). Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)

The objective of IAY is primarily to help construction/up gradation of dwelling unit of

Scheduled Castes/Tribes and other BPL rural households by providing them lump sum

assistance. The amount of assistance provided per dwelling unit used to be Rs. 25,000/‐ and Rs.

27,500/‐ for plain areas and hilly/difficult areas respectively for new construction and

Rs. 12,500/‐ for up‐gradation of Kutcha houses. Since 1.4.2008, the assistance is now enhanced

to Rs. 35,000/‐ in plain areas and Rs. 38,500/‐ in hilly/difficult areas. For up‐gradation, the

assistance is also enhanced to Rs. 15,000/‐ per unit. Total of 50 houses have been constructed in

the Project Area under Indira Awaas Yojana.

Table No. 4: Developmental Programmes Running In The Project Area:

Sl. No

Name of the Programme/ Scheme

Sponsoring Agency

Objectives of the

programme/ scheme

Villages covered

Estimated number of beneficiaries

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 MGNREGS Rural

Development Dept.

Employment 3 465 household

2 IAY Rural

Development Dept.

Housing 3 50

3 BADP MHA Infrastructure 2

4 SGSY Rural

Development Dept.

Livelihood 3 25



Chapter – 3: Basic Information of the Project Area

3.1. Geography and Geohydrology 3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Lunglei‐III Watershed is about 8718 ha out of which 6% is forest

area. About 37.2% of land is under agriculture which is completely rain‐fed. About 58.17% of the total

land is classified under wasteland of which 98.5 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly.

3.1.2 Agroclimatic Condition:

Climate is one of the most important factors of a geographical environment to which man is a

subject. It control man’s activities like agriculture, forestry, supply of water, industries etc., the climate of

Mizoram as a whole is controlled by its location, physiographic conditions, pressure regime in North‐

west India and Bay of Bengal, warm and moist maritime tropical air masses from the Bay of Bengal, local

mountains and valley winds.

Lunglei District enjoys a moderate climate owing to its tropical location. It is neither very hot nor

too cold throughout the year. And the district falls under the direct influence of southwest monsoon. As

such the project area is receiving an adequate amount of rainfall, which is responsible for a humid

tropical climate characterized by short winter and long summer with heavy rainfall. During winter

season, the temperature varies from 8 C to 24 C and in summer from 18 C to 32 C. However, cyclonic

storm is often experienced in the western part of the district. Normally, heavy rain fall from May to

September and maximum rainfall is received during the month of August. The average annual rainfall

during the last 5 years is 2615 mm.

3.1.3 Soil Classification:

Soil is the product of interaction between parent materials, climate and biotic factors as modified

by the terrain conditions and the direction over which the interaction has been going on. The soils of the

district are generally sandstone and shale. The derived soils are mostly red and yellow loamy. The soil is

acidic in nature due to heavy rainfall. It contains a high amount of organic carbon and is high in nitrogen,

low in phosphorous and potassium content.

3.1.4 Land and Agriculture:

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for

irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 2.41 ha ranging from 1 to 4

ha. Lack of sources of irrigation force the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood.

This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. Some of the farmers take up rain‐fed castor

crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the

area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard in the residual moisture.



Table No. 4: Land-use Pattern in the Project Area:

Table No. 5: Agro Climatic Condition

Sl No.

Name of the Project

Name of the AgroClimatic

zone covers Project area

Area (in Ha)

Name of the Villages

Major soil type Topography.

Ave.rain fall in mm

(Preceding 5yrs average)

Major crops

Type Area (in Ha)

Name Area (in Ha)

1 Lunglei –III (Lower Phairuanglui)

Humid Sub‐Tropical 5043

PhairuangkaiRotlang ‘W’ Runtung

a) Humic Hapladults

b) Typic Dystrochrepts

5043 Undulating 2510m

Paddy, Maize, Sugarcane, Oil seed

45

Sl. No Name of Watersheds Names of

Villages

Geographical Area of the

Village

( in Ha )

Forest Area

( in Ha )

Land Under Agricultural

Use

( in Ha )

Rainfed Areas

( in Ha )

Permanent Pastures

( in Ha )

Wasteland

Cultivable

( in Ha )

Non Cultivable ( in Ha )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Lower Phairuanglui–I Lower Phairuanglui–II Lower Phairuanglui–III Lower Phairuanglui–IV Lower Phairuanglui–V Lower Phairuanglui–VI Lower Phairuanglui–VII

Phairuangkai 1762 50 5 1762 0 1700 7 Rotlang ‘W’ 1900 100 10 1900 0 1750 10 Runtung 5056 350 30 5056 0 1550 55

Total 8718 500 3248 8718 0 5000 72



Table No. 6: Flood and Drought in the Project Area

Sl. No Particulars Villages Periodicity Not effected Annual Any other

(specify)

Not affected

Table No. 7: Soil erosion in the Project Area

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (Ha)

Run off (mm/yr)

Ave soil loss (Ton/ha/yr)

Run off by Heavy Rain Sheet & Rill 315 18mm

Jhum paddy 20% slope = 23.50 Tons/ha/yr 40% slope = 31.0 Ton/ha/yr

Source: Report of Agriculture Production 2008 – 2009. District Agriculture Officer, Lunglei. 3.2. SocioEconomic Profile 3.2.1 Demographic and Ethnographic Status:

In spite of high per capita of land available, the production of crops cannot meet

requirement due to low availability of inputs, scarcity of irrigation facilities as well as

remoteness of the areas. As such 20‐30% of the inhabitants migrate yearly. To increase

production of food grains for the rural poor families, improvement and development of land

resources and provision of irrigation facilities will constitute the main thrust areas of the

project.

Lunglei III Watershed Project has a total of 445 households with a population of 2048

(as per baseline survey) out of which 1089 are male and 959 female .The sex ratio is 880 female

to 1000 male. There are 1638 BPL families. The average family size is 4.6. Density of population

in the project area of 23 persons per hectare of land and per capita availably of land is 4.26. The

major tribes in the village are Mizo, Bru, Pang and Chakma.



Table No. 8: Demography and Land Distribution

Name of the Village

No. of Household

Male Population

Female Population

Total Population

Density of Population (person/Ha)

Per Capita Availability of Land

Phairuangkai 280 688 589 1277 72 1.38

Rotlang ‘W’ 125 290 270 560 29 3.39

Runtung 40 111 100 211 4 23.96

Total 445 1089 959 2048 23 4.26

3.2.2 SocioEconomic Condition:

The financial position of the people is generally poor. The density of the population in the

area is low. There is no important industry in the area.

3.3. Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during

lean seasons they generally migrate for wage labour to other parts of the state.



PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED (PRA)

Sl.No Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to

overcome problems

1 Soil Conservation (Slope, soil loss, rainfall, productivity, etc)

Steep slope; heavy soil erosion; large wasteland; low productivity.

Afforestation, Bunding, Trenching, Terracing etc.

2 Water conservation (Water budget, Ground water norms, productivity) Low water table; draught; low rainfall; dry months

Construction of Water Harvest Tanks, Check Dams, Trenching etc

3 Crop coverage – {80% of w/s area should be with canopy} Low crop coverage

Plantation, Trenching etc

4 Agriculture productivity (Crop wise compare with dist. Average) Low productivity; low cropped area.

Vermi‐composting, Plantation, Terracing etc.

5 Livestock productivity Underdeveloped livestock rearing; ignorance and absence of animal health care; unavailability of capital funds.

Fodder Banks, Vety care, Scientific Livestock rearing etc.

6 Existing Livelihood activities for Asset less persons Wage labour; subsistence economy

Development of Carpentry etc, Capacity development and institution building, Provision of Funds

7 Community Based Organizations & Social capital base

Economically disorganized community; no organizations based on economic development.

Development of WCs, SHGs , UGs, SHG Federations

8 Capacity Building (participation, awareness of watershed community Low quality of human recourses

Awareness campaigns, Training of all stakeholders etc.

9 Any Other (specify)



FGD 1: LIVESTOCK GROUP

Work out the physical & financial requirements for the entire Village based on the total animal population

Sl. No

Type of Animals

No. of Animals with

rearers

Problem typology (Describe)

Proposed interventions

Units Required

Proposed cost (In Rs. Lakhs)

Animal reproduction

Animal Health

Animal management (feed etc)

Marketing/Trading

Skills in managem

ent

Any other

(specify)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

NAME OF VILLAGE: PHAIRUANGKAI

1 Milch Animals

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cattle Rearing Dairy Farming and Fodder Banks

2 @2.50 per Unit

2 Draught Animals

NA NA NA Unsuitable terrain

NA NA NA

3 Small

ruminants (Poultry)

265 Low Low; Vety care absent

Low skill level; low availability of feed

Low production; local needs not served

Low skill level

NA Poultry farming 5 @2.50 per Unit

4

Small ruminants (Goat/ Sheep)




Low skill level

NA Goat farming 3 @2.50 per Unit

5 Small

ruminants (Pig)




Low skill level NA Piggery farming 6

@2.50 per Unit



NAME OF VILLAGE: ROTLANG ‘W’

1 Milch Animals

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cattle Rearing Dairy Farming and Fodder Banks

2 @2.50 per Unit

2 Draught Animals

NA NA NA Unsuitable terrain

NA NA NA

3 Small

ruminants (Poultry)




Low skill level

NA Poultry farming 3 @2.50 per Unit

4





Low skill level NA Goat farming 2

@2.50 per Unit

5 Small

ruminants (Pig)




Low skill level NA Piggery farming 2

@2.50 per Unit

NAME OF VILLAGE: RUNTUNG

1 Milch Animals 2 Low

Low; Vety care absent

Scarce NA NA NA Cattle Rearing Dairy Farming and Fodder Banks

1 @2.50 per Unit

2 Draught Animals 1 Low

Low; Vety care absent

Unsuitable terrain NA NA NA

3 Small

ruminants (Poultry)




Low skill level NA Poultry farming 2

@2.50 per Unit

4





Low skill level NA Goat farming 1

@2.50 per Unit

5 Small

ruminants (Pig)




Low skill level

NA Piggery farming 1 @2.50 per Unit



FGD 2: ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT GROUP

Proposed interventions for Existing Livelihoods

Sl.No Homogenous

Group Type of activity

Average income per

month

Problem typology

Proposed interventions

Units required

Unit Cost (In Rs. Lakhs) Procurement

Production/Service

Marketing Skills

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 Micro‐ Enterprises

Petty Trade 7000/‐ High costs Local needs;

low profit Local Low level

Higher investment Skill upgradation Tree Plantation

15 0.25

2 Artisans Carpentry 7500/‐ Scarce raw material and equipments;

Local needs; low profit Local Low

level 12 0.25



Table No. 9: Summary of Livelihoods

Sl.No Name of Village

Existing livelihood

Possible livelihood interventions under

the project

Current status of migration (No. of people)

Main reasons for migration

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 Phairuangkai

Agriculture: Rice from Jhum & WRC Others Activities : Poultry, Piggery, Goatery

1. Agriculture: Land Development Work for cereal

Production. 2. Horticulture Development: For different fruits, crops & Oil Seed

3. Soil & Moisture Conservation:

Bench Terrace, Contour Bund, PRWH etc.

4. Fishery Dev. 5. Other Homestead Activities Livestock, Bamboo Craft, Tailoring, Carpentry etc.

64

In search of better

livelihood

2 Rotlang ‘W’ 28

3 Runtung 11



Chapter – 4: Project Approach and Strategies

4.1 Opportunities for intervention

i). The Project will provide an opportunity for the poor communities, women and the youth

in particular, to form groups to increase their voice and accessibility to services as well as to

strengthen their capacity to plan and implement programmes for economic and social

betterment.

ii). The youth, who form about 25 per cent of the total population in the project area, will

have an opportunity to come together and acquire necessary vocational skills which are relevant

to the local economy and to take up employment/self‐employment for which there is at present

few avenues.

iii). Presently, the poor people in the project area do not have food security for part of the

year. The Project provides an opportunity for them to improve food security through

interventions in agriculture, allied occupations, and other livelihood activities and through

better management of the natural resources.

iv). Channelling various development schemes particularly concerning women and

Children through SHGs formed under this project.

v). The project will provide platform for women to discuss common problems.

vi). It will improve awareness level of rural women on various development schemes and

government agencies implementing them.

4.2 Implementation Approach and Methodology

The proposed design of the project will take note of the shortcomings of previous

programmes to improve plan strategy and focus on effective implementation for target

realization. The basic thrust of the project is aimed at empowering poor households in rural

areas to directly deal with wide and diverse range of problems and constraints that hampers

livelihood developments as well as to place them in a better position to capture opportunities

for livelihood improvement. These problems express themselves (a) at the household level in

terms of food security, (b) at the production system level in terms of low productivity, (c) at the

community level poor infrastructure and service delivery and (d) at the supply chain level in

terms of inadequate access to input and output markets including financial services. These

problems are interrelated leading to vicious cycles and resulting in poverty traps; often



exacerbated by natural resource degradation as is now conspicuously happening in Mizoram

with declining Jhum cycles being a case in point.

In order to break out of these poverty traps there is a need for a holistic approach that

allows for dealing with these interrelated problems in a simultaneous fashion. It will focus on

introducing approaches which:

• are more responsive to communities’ perceptions of needs and priorities;

• involve communities more in decision making and planning;

• make communities more responsible for management of their development programmes

in order to generate a greater sense of ownership of development interventions;

• build on the traditional values of community participation; and

• Utilize the strengths of village institutions and other community organizations.

The Project will take into account various on‐going schemes presently at various stages of

implementation and would facilitate complementing each other and thereby optimize benefits to

the targeted beneficiaries. The first element of this strategy will be to introduce participatory

planning and monitoring processes and finance priority activities identified through the

involvement of all stakeholders especially the beneficiaries which will reflect in more productive

and sustainable use of the available resources. Such planning & monitoring will:

• assist farmers in the gradual conversion of their presently unsustainable farming systems

into a more sustainable system through micro financing

• promoting permanent plantation crops in fallow Jhum fields;

• introduce crops and agronomic practices which contribute to soil conservation;

• promote water resource conservation and enhance water‐use efficiency for irrigation;

• build on the natural advantages of the area through greater emphasis on agro‐forestry as

sources of livelihood as well as environmental protection;

• enhance rural income through promoting livestock and fishery enterprise;

• adopt strategies suited to the remoteness of region through emphasis on low input

technology and on high value/low volume; and

• introduce contract farming approach offering windows of opportunity for marketing

outside the region;

Emphasis will be given on social empowerment through formation of Self Help Groups

and rationalization of land utilization according to its suitability for different purposes. The most

vulnerable steep slopes will be taken out of agricultural usage and converted to forestry and

perennial tree crops. Forestry, agro‐forestry and perennial crops development programmes are



planned to first generate livelihood resources for Jhum cultivators and then to gradually reduce

their dependency on Jhum. Food security strategies will build on the present trend of optimizing

land utilization through switching to more productive cash crops whilst ensuring a minimum

level of home food production.

The second element of this strategy will focus on developing self‐reliant community

institutions to manage implementation of the project activities and sustain and further

development in the long term. A flexible approach will be required in order to cater for the

different socio‐cultural characteristics of the various tribal communities. As most traditional

community institutions exhibit deficiencies which impair their suitability for management of

development under the project, communities will be encouraged to establish a Village

Development Committee as an arm of the traditional village council, providing for greater focus

on vulnerable groups; broader representation including women, youth and the marginalized

groups; greater accountability and transparency in their operations and greater involvement of

women in community affairs. The process for establishing the Village Development Committees

will be in tune with local customs and will be based on consensus of the entire community.

4.3 Convergence Strategy:

• The implementation of a project with emphasis on livelihood development for

sustainability is often constrained by lack of awareness about other rural

developmental programmes such as SGSY ,MGNREGS etc, absence of professionals at

field level to provide technical support, lack of professional advice in preparation of

projects and absence of marketing support‐backward & forward linkages.

• Under the Project, SHGs formation as a measure for institution building for social

empowerment can be converged with funds under SGSY. More over Rural Haat at the

District with project cost of Rs.1.5 Crores to be constructed under SGSY will provide

necessary marketing infrastructures for SHGs.

• Under this project, awareness campaign among SHGs will be given importance as a

means of social empowerment which will help the rural people in getting to know the

various developmental schemes implemented. This will create behavioural change

among the people towards monitoring of implementation of such schemes and there by

empowered themselves as a strong grassroots level monitoring body.



• The various livelihood activities to be taken up under the Project can be complemented

by implementation of MGNREGS Scheme. Under MGNREGS , Afforestation , conservation

of water and land development are the prioritised permissible works and by converging

with this Project the much needed support for farmers with requirement of upfront

capital as well as management of natural resources in the form of water conservation and

forest protection can be successfully achieved. Under MGNREGS, SHGs can be given

Project Implementing Agency role. With better formation of SHG under this Project, SHG

may be given responsibility of implementation of developmental works on a pilot project

basis under MGNREGS thereby empowering them to take initiatives.

• It is proposed that of the 20 (Twenty) Kms of Agricultural Link Roads to be constructed

under this Project, 8 (Eight) Kms of the road will be constructed through convergence

with MGNREGS.

• Construction of 200 Ha of Terraces as Natural Resources Development under the Project

will also be undertaken under MGNREGS during a five‐year period.



Chapter 5: Project Objectives and Scope

5.1 Project objectives:

The development objective of the Watershed Project would be to improve capacity

and opportunities for the targeted rural poor to achieve sustainable livelihoods. To achieve this

objective the Project will stress on:

• Conservation, development and sustainable management of natural recourses including

their use.

• Enhancement of agricultural productivity and production in sustainable manner.

• Restoration of ecological balance in the degraded and fragile rainfed ecosystem

• Empowerment of women through provision of economic opportunities

• Creation of sustained employment opportunities for the rural community including the

landless.

• Enhance participation of the rural poor in economic activities.

• Increase income among project target households through assets and market linkages.

5.2 Project Core Values:

The Project staffs, including the Watershed Development Team, the Watershed

Association and the community will adhere to the following non‐negotiable principles of the

project:

1) Transparency: All the activities undertaken will entail decisions to be taken

involving all those directly concerned in the project activities. The process

followed would be open, clear and accessible to all.

2) Participation: The project will ensure participation of all stakeholders. Each

decision taken would follow a participatory process and there would be no

imposition at any level.

3) Team Work and Accountability: At each level the responsibilities will be

mutually and collectively owned. Each stakeholder is responsible for actions

taken.



4) Demand driven: The project will endeavour the stakeholders to have each

activity including group building, activity undertaken and preparation and

implementation of livelihoods plan based on their demand.

5) Facilitation: The project implementers would play only a catalytic role and

strive to hand over the responsibility to the community to the maximum extent

possible.

6) Process Oriented: The entire project implementation has a unique/standard

process for every stage. These standards will be followed by all the

stakeholders.



Chapter – 6: Budgeting

6.1 Budgeting and Budget Components

As provided in the Common Guidelines, the cost of the project is divided into various

components given in Table No. 10 below. It helps us in further identifying activities under

different components and allocate appropriate funds.

Table No. 10: Budget at a Glance

SL. No. COMPONENT PERCENTAGE OF

TOTAL OUTLAY AMOUNT

(in Rs. Lakhs)

1 2 3 4

A. NET PROJECT COST 750.0

B. MANAGEMENT COMPONENT

1. Administrative Charges 10% 75.0

2. Entry Point Activity 4% 30.0

3. Capacity Building and Training 5% 37.5

4. DPR Preparation 1% 7.5

5. Monitoring 1% 7.5

6. Evaluation 1% 7.5

C. DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT

7. Natural Resources Management 50% 375.0

8. Livelihood Support System 10% 75

9. Farm Production System 13% 97.5

10. Consolidation Phase 5% 37.5

TOTAL 100% 750.0



Chapter 7: Detailed Description of Project Components and Activities

Various studies have revealed that there is need of a systematic and scientific approach to

deal with watershed development. The Common Guidelines for Integrated Watershed

Management Programme framed fresh and flexible paradigms for watershed development.

Detailed description of Components and Activities to be taken up in Lunglei III Watershed are as

below:

7.1. Scientific Planning: i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo‐hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster

of micro‐watersheds. Lunglei III Watershed consists of seven Micro‐watersheds viz. Lower

Phairuanglui – I, Lower Phairuanglui – II, Lower Phairuanglui – III, Lower Phairuanglui – VI,

Lower Phairuanglui – V, Lower Phairuanglui – VI, Lower Phairuanglui – VII coded as 3c3c4blc,

3c3c4c1a, 3c3c4b1b, 3c3c4c1c, 3c3c4d1a, 3c3c4c1d, 3c3c4d2d respectively. Further, the

watershed is in continuation with other watershed which gives an element of continuation of the

programme.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of the programme, a detailed Baseline Survey was conducted. This

will act as a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of the project. The

detailed baseline survey undertaken involved household census survey, Bio‐physical survey and

Village level data collection. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which

was been filled by visiting each and every household in the three villages. This gave details of the

demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL

household, etc., and various schemes running and their benefits. Bio‐physical survey was

undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village including soil typology,

wells in the area, crop taken in the field etc.



iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating

accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to

include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for

planning, implementing, monitoring and post‐withdrawal activities with complete

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social

mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of

the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers at ease than

complicated questionnaires.

iv). Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for planning

Use of various scientific tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed

development. Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process.

Various layers of maps relating to Geo‐morphology, Soil, BPL Population, ground water Status,

drinking water situation, slope percent etc. were created. These were all given proper Weightage

according to DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

7.2 Institutional Set up &Organization of community i) Project Implementing Agency

Project Implementing Agency will put together a dedicated Watershed Development

Team. The Project Implementing Agency will provide necessary technical guidance to the Gram

Panchayat for preparation of development plans for the watershed through Participatory Rural

Appraisal exercise, undertake community organization and trainings for the village

communities, supervise watershed development activities, inspect and authenticate project

accounts, monitor and review the overall project implementation and set up institutional

arrangements for post –project operation and maintenance of assets created during the project

period.

ii) Watershed Development Team

The Watershed Development Team is an integral part of the PIA and will be set up by the

PIA. Watershed Development Team will consist of technically trained persons. One woman

member with experience in social mobilization is included in the WDT. Block Development

Officer, Lungsen will be the Team Leader of WDT. Team leader will Co‐ordinate with other



members for smooth implementation of the project. WDT will assist Gram Sabha in constitution

of the Watershed Committee and their functioning, organizing and nurturing User Groups and

Self Help Groups, conducting the participatory Baseline Surveys, training and capacity building,

preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation,

undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawing and cost estimates for any

structures to be built.

7.2.1 Community Institution building The project will promote a community institutional model taking into consideration

experiences and lessons learned from other rural livelihoods projects taken up/supported by

the Government/Banks. The basic unit of the community based institutional model will be

Watershed Committees (WCs), User Groups (UGs) and Self Help Groups (SHGs). The Watershed

Committee is a group representing all rural poor households. SHGs are small groups of the poor,

formed on the basis of social affinity and common interests, in each village. Each SHG will have a

minimum of ten families; one or two members from each household and at least 50% of the

member shall be women. The project will provide intensive, hand‐holding support to the SHGs

in order to help them become vibrant, self managed and sustainable organizations, founded on

the principles of mutual trust and self‐help among the members. Each SHG will follow a clearly

laid‐out sequential path of gradual development that will include responsible management of

group funds through savings and inter‐lending.

i) Watershed Committee (WC):

It is a committee constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the Watershed Project with

technical support of Watershed Development Team (WDT) in the village. This committee is

registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the

Chairman of the Watershed Committee with the Secretary. Capacity building training to the

Watershed Committee will be given by WDT. The Watershed Committee has a pivotal role to

play during and after the project implementation period.

ii) User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme

on a long term basis. The user group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and

manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a

feeling of ownership with community spirit.



iii) Self Help Group (SHG):

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through

credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for women help uplift their

livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were

held with the women, which came up with the following observations:

• Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit

Institution

• Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

• Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

Strategy for formation of SHGs:

All the targeted households in the village would be encouraged to form SHGs. Each SHG will

have a minimum of 10 families. Project beneficiaries form SHGs after agreeing with the concept and

principles of the Project. They will decide the group name, and elect office bearers (President,

Secretary); jointly open a bank account and the President and Secretary will be the signatories.

(i) Capacity building inputs:

Capacity building inputs would be provided based on the stage in which the SHG is. WDT

will help strengthen the group’s processes in management of the saving, loan vetting and

repayment, and good governance through norm setting. The concept of credit appraisal, conflict

resolution etc. are also introduced.

(ii) Strategy for Existing SHGs:

There are many SHGs already in existence in the project area. Most of these have been

promoted under various programmes. These groups would also be eligible beneficiaries under

the Project.



Table No. 11: List of existing Self Help Groups in the Project Area

7.2.2 Capacity Building

i) Trainings Trainings will be conducted for all stakeholders in specialised institutions.

ii) Tour & Exposure Visits

Various tours and exposure visits of WDT members, WC members, UGs and SHGs

have been planned within the state and out of the state to the successful projects, so that

all the stakeholders can adopt the successful techniques and researches.

Sl. No.

Name of Group

Name of the Village

Date of Formatio

n

Members Savings per head / per

month (Rs.)

RemarksST Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 Kumtluang SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 05/06/05 10 0 10 120.00

2 Vanapa SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 27/07/05 10 0 10 120.00

3 Taitesena SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 01/09/05 10 0 10 120.00

4 Dyna SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 01/09/08 10 0 10 100.00

5 Nauban SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 25/05/10 10 0 10 103.00

6 Ainawn SHG Rotlang ‘W’ 12/04/09 10 0 10 103.00

7 Chawnpui SHG Phairuangkai 14/03/08 10 0 10 110.00

8 Ropuiliani SHG Phairuangkai 15/07/08 10 0 10 120.00

9 Tumchhingi SHG Phairuangkai 07/07/08 10 0 10 120.00



Table No.12: Capacity Building Plan (All financial figures in Rs. Lakh)

CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTIONS IN MIZORAM IDENTIFIED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF

LUNGLEIIII WATERSHED PROJECT

Sl. No Name of Institution Type Specialization

1 State Institute for Rural Development, Kolasib State Government Rural Development and

Watershed Management

2 Extension Training Centre, Pukpui State Government Rural Development and

Watershed Management

3 Rural Self Employment Training Institute, Zemabawk

State Government Carpentry etc

4 Indian Council for Agricultural Research, Kolasib

Central Government Agriculture, Horticulture and allied Subjects

5

Integrated Training Centre, Hnathial

State Government Agriculture, Horticulture and allied Subjects

6 Industrial Training Institute, Aizawl State Government Mechanic, Electrician etc

Sl. No

Activity No of

Persons

Frequency/ No of Training Programmes

Estimated Cost

(In Rs.Lakhs) 1 2 3 4 5

1 Training of Project Stakeholders ‐ WDT 5 3 1.5

2 Training of Project Stakeholders ‐ WCs 50 5 1.5

3 Training of Project Stakeholders ‐ SHGs 300 8 11.0

4 Training of Project Stakeholders ‐ UGs 700 11 11.0

5 Exposure Tours and Visits ‐ 4 7.5

6 Street Plays ‐ Unspecified 0.5

7 Video Shows and Documentation ‐ Unspecified 2.5

8 Pamphlets and Posters ‐ ‐ 0.5

9 Banners and Hoardings ‐ ‐ 2.5 TOTAL 37.5



7.3 Physical Activities to Be Undertaken 7.3.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village

community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works which are in

urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with

Watershed Development Committees regarding the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that

an amount of Rs. 30 Lakhs was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated

budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important and finally decided

on those given below.

Table No.13 Entry point activities (EPA)

Sl. No

Names of Villages

Amount Earmarked for EPA

(In Rs. Lakh)

Entry Point Activities Planned Estimated Cost (In Rs. Lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5

1 Phairuangkai Rotlang ’W’ Runtung

30.0

Construction of Agriculture Link Road, 4 Kms. 15.0

Construction of Public Urinal (6 Units @ Rs.25000.00 each) 1.50

Construction of Rainwater Harvesting Structures (3 Units @ Rs.3 Lakhs each)

9.0

Construction of R.C.C Resting Inns (3 Units @ Rs.1.5 Lakhs)

4.50



7.3.2 Detailed Cost Estimates for works taken up under Entry Point Activities (EPA)

Table No. 14 Cost Estimate for construction of Water Harvesting Tank

Sl. No. Description No. L B W Qnty. Unit Rate Amount

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08

Earthwork in excavation in foundation trenches etc not exceeding 2 m depth etc a) Hard Soil

Column - 9 1.10 1.10 1.10 11.98 m3

Total 11.98 m3 163.60 1959.93

2/4.05 Providng and laying cement concrete 1:3:6

Foundation 9 1.10 1.10 0.20 2.18 m3

Total 2.18 m3 3991.60 8701.69

3/5.01

Providng and laying RCC 1:2:4

(a) all work upto fdn. & plinth level

Foundation- 9 1.10 1.10 0.45 4.90 m3

Total 4.90 m3 4859.40 23813.49

b) Columns - 9 0.30 0.30 2.00 1.62 m3

Wall 4 3.00 2.40 0.20 5.76 m3

Total 7.38 m3 4991.00 36833.58

c) Beams - 6 0.20 0.30 3.00 1.08 m3

Suspended Floor/Roof 1 3.00 3.00 0.12 1.08 m3

1 3.00 3.00 0.20 1.80 m3

Total 3.96 m3 6093.30 24129.47

4/5.06

HYSD bars reinforcement for RCC work etc

Fdn. @ 100 kg/m3 490.05 Kg

Columns @ 310 kg/m3 502.20 Kg

Beam @ 270 kg/m3 291.60 Kg



Suspended Floor/Roof/Wall @ 100 kg/m3

864.00 Kg

Total 2147.85 Kg 49.40 106103.79

5/5.08

Centering and Shuttering including strutting, propping etc.

c) Column - 34 0.30 2.00 20.40 m2 241.60 4928.64

d) Beam 6 0.20 3.00 3.60 m2

8 0.30 3.00 7.20 m2

Total 10.80 m2 184.20 1989.36

Suspended Floor/Roof 2 3.00 3.00 18.00 m2 276.00 4968.00

Wall 8 3.00 2.40 57.60 m2 206.30 11882.88

6/21.21

12mm Cement plaster 1:4 finished with a floating coat of neat cement.

1 3.00 3.00 9.00 m2

4 3.00 2.40 28.80 m2

Net Total 37.80 m2 163.80 6191.64

7/18.05

Providing & fixing GI pipe complete with GI fitting

20mm dia. Nominal bore 1 3.00 3.00 Rm 122.30 366.90

40mm dia. Nominal bore 1 1.25 1.25 Rm 248.20 310.25

TOTAL = 232179.1

Add 6% for site development = 13930.78

NET TOTAL = 246110.9

Add 21.90 % for Cost Index = 53898.18

Grand Total 300008.7

Say 300000.0

(Rupees Three Lakh) only





Table No. 15 Cost Estimate for construction of Public Urinal

Sl. No. Description No. L B W Qnty. Unit Rate Amount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08

Earthwork in excavation in foundation trenches etc not exceeding 2 m depth etc a) Ordinary Soil

1 0.60 0.60 2.00 0.72 m3

6 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.30 m3

Total 2.02 m3 109.10 220.38

2/5.01

Providng and laying RCC 1:2:4

(a) all work upto fdn. & plinth level

Foundation- 6 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.43 m3

Post 6 0.20 0.20 1.90 0.46 m3

Total 0.89 m3 4859.40 4315.15

3/5.06

HYSD bars reinforcement for RCC work etc Fdn. @ 100 kg/m3 43.20 Kg Columns @ 310 kg/m3 141.36 Kg Total 184.56 Kg 49.40 9117.26

4/5.08

Centering and Shuttering including strutting, propping etc. Post 24 1.90 0.30 13.68 m2 241.60 3305.09

5/6.09

7.5 cm thick brick masonry with first class brick in superstucture above plinth level upto floor etc (a) in cement mortar 1:3 Walling 2 1.50 2.00 6.00 m2 3 1.50 1.20 5.40 m2 Total 11.40 m2

6/12.02

Cement Concrete flooring 1:2:4 finished with a floating coat of neat cement c) 75 mm thick 1 1.80 2.00 3.60 m2 429.70 1546.92

7/21.12 15mm cement plaster 1:3 4 1.50 2.00 6.00 m2 6 1.50 1.20 10.80 m2 Total 16.80 m2 169.80 2852.64

8/21.85

Distempering with oil bound washable distemper or new work (two or more coats)

Qnty BF item No 7/21.12 16.80 m2 49.00 823.20 TOTAL = 22180.64 Add 21.90 % for Cost Index = 4857.56 Grand Total 27038.20 Say 27000.00 (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) only





Table No. 16 Cost Estimate for construction of Agriculture link road

( As per PWD (MZ) SOR 2008 - Rural Road )

TOTAL LENGTH : 4000 M

Sl. No. Description Unit L

(m) W (m) Qty Rate

(in Rs) Amount ( in Rs)

1 2 6 3 4 5 7 8

1/2.2

Clearing and Grubbing of road length including uprooting wild vegetation, shrubs, etc. complete (i) Manual means (A) in area of Thorny jungle

Ha 4000.00 3.50 1.40 26638.00 37293.20

2/2.3

Cutting of Trees including cutting of trunks, and removal of stumps and roots, compaction of back filling etc.

(i) Girth above 300mm-600mm No. 115 103.00 11845.00

(ii) Girth above 600mm-900mm No. 89 192.00 17088.00

(iii) Girth above 900mm-1800mm No. 40 360.00 14400.00

3/8.3

(ii)(A) Excavation in hilly area by Mechanical means m3. Qty taken from

E/W Table 15682.14 55.00 862517.70

(iv) Excavation in hilly area in ordinary rock not required blasting by Mechanical means

m3 Qty taken from E/W Table 4780.86 95.00 454181.70

TOTAL: 1397325.60 For Surveying ( Detailed Survey Estimate attached): 102690.00

GRAND TOTAL: 1500015.60

( SAY ): 1500000.00

( Rupees Fifteen Lakhs) only



ESTIMATE FOR SURVEYING

TOTAL LENGTH : 4000 m

Sl. No. Description Unit No L

(m) W(m)

H/D(m) Qty Rate


1 2 6 3 4 5 7 8

PRELIMINARY SURVEY

1/2.2

Jungle clearance for Initial Stage (i) By Manual means: (a) In area of thorny Jungle:

m2 1 4000 1 4000.00 2.277 9108.00

DETAILED SURVEY

2/2.2 Jungle clearance for Detailed Survey (i) By Manual means:

m2 1 4000 1.5 6000.00 2.277 13662.00

TRACE PATH CUTTING

3/8.3

Earthwork in Hill road. (i)Excavation in hilly area in Soil by Manual means

m3 1 4000 0.6 0.45 1080 74.00 79920.00

TOTAL: 102690.00

(Rupees One Lakh two thousand six hundred ninety) only.



Table No. 17 Cost Estimate for construction Of Resting Shed

Sl. No. Description No. L B W Qnty. Unit Rate Amount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08

Earthwork in excavation in foundation trenches etc not exceeding 2 m depth etc a) Ordinary Soil Column - 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 m3 Tie Beams - 2 4.00 0.20 0.20 0.32 m3 2 3.00 0.20 0.20 0.24 m3 Total 4.56 m3 109.10 497.50

2/5.01

Providng and laying RCC 1:2:4 (a) all work upto fdn. & plinth level Foundation- 4 0.90 0.90 0.20 0.65 m3 Tie Beams - 2 4.55 0.20 0.30 0.55 m3 2 3.10 0.20 0.30 0.37 m3 Shelves - 1 4.55 0.60 0.10 0.27 m3 2 1.68 0.60 0.10 0.20 m3 2 1.90 0.60 0.10 0.23 m3 Total 2.27 m3 4859.40 11024.03 b) Columns - 4 3.40 0.20 0.20 0.54 m3 4991.00 2695.14 c) Beams - 2 4.55 0.20 0.30 0.55 m3 2 3.10 0.20 0.20 0.25 m3 Total 1.34 m3 5093.30 6825.02

3/5.06

HYSD bars reinforcement for RCC work etc Fdn. @ 100 kg/m3 64.80 Kg Columns @ 310 kg/m3 167.40 Kg Beam @ 270 kg/m3 609.66 Kg Shelves @ 100 kg/m3 70.26 Kg Total 912.12 Kg 49.40 45058.73



4/5.08

Centering and Shuttering including strutting, propping etc. c) Column - 16 3.40 0.25 13.60 m2 241.60 3285.76 d) Beam 2 4.55 0.20 1.82 m2 4 4.55 0.30 5.46 m2 2 3.10 0.20 1.24 m2 4 3.10 0.30 3.72 m2 Total 12.24 m2 184.20 2254.61

5/6.09

7.5 cm thick brick masonry with first class brick in superstucture above plinth level upto floor etc (a) in cement mortar 1:3 Walling 6 0.60 0.73 2.63 m2 2 4.55 0.75 6.83 m2 2 3.10 0.75 4.65 m2 Total 14.10 m2 Deduct openning Door 'D' 1 1.20 0.75 0.89 m2 Net Total 13.21 m2 425.90 5625.71

6/9.08

Providing & fixing 1st class local wood in trusses etc including hoisting, fixing in position etc complete Rafter - 10 4.00 0.10 0.075 0.30 m3 Colar - 10 2.40 0.10 0.075 0.18 m3 Purlin - 10 5.10 0.08 0.050 0.19 m3 Total 0.67 m3 13579.80 9098.47

7/12.02

Cement Concrete flooring 1:2:4 finished with a floating coat of neat



cement

c) 75 mm thick 1 4.55 3.10 14.09 m2 429.70 6054.26

8/16.01

Providing corrugated GS sheet roofing fixed with necessary nut, bolt and washers etc complete (e) 0.63 mm thick 2 4.10 5.10 41.82 m2 319.90 13378.22

9/16.06

Providing & fixing 0.63 mm thick plain GS sheet ridges etc complete (b) 0.63 mm thick 1 5.10 5.10 Rm 251.30 1281.63

10/21.12

15mm cement plaster 1:3 2 13.00 26.00 m2 2 1.00 4.55 9.09 m2 2 0.85 3.10 5.24 m2 4 0.85 1.85 6.24 m2 Total 46.57 m2 169.80 7907.59

11/21.85

Distempering with oil bound washable distemper or new work (two or more coats) Qnty BF item No 10/21.13 46.57 m2 49.00 2281.93

TOTAL = 117268.59 Add 5% for site development = 5863.43 NET TOTAL = 123132.02 Add 21.90 % for Cost Index = 26965.91 Grand Total 150097.93 Say 150000.00 (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) only



7.3.3. Natural Resources Management:

A multi‐tier Ridge to Valley Sequence Approach will be utilized for implementation of

watershed development works. A net budget of 50 % is allotted for these works.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans: Water resources originate from the Ridge area. This involves hilly and forest and

wasteland region in the watershed. For the ridge area the following structures are proposed:

i). Stone Bunding

ii). Staggered Contour Trenches

iii). Border Contour Trenching with Tree plantations

i). Stone Bunding Stone bunds will be constructed along contours or streams. It will be adopted where the

water velocity is high and where basically stone of radius 100‐150 mm is available. It helps in:

· Control of erosion by reducing the slope of the cultivated land

· Increasing the infiltration of rainwater

Main advantages as compared to the normal contour bunding are:

· Ridge area of the project has much steeper slopes

· The region has shallow soil depth.

· It is a more permanent structure if well maintained

· It is self – stabilizing

ii). Staggered Contour Trenches

Trenches are any form of depression or micro pit constructed over the land surface in

order to prevent soil erosion and to absorb rainwater in non‐arable lands. Trenches will be

constructed along the contours on hill slopes with vegetative supports for forestry, moisture and

soil conservation and horticulture land uses. Contour Trenches will be used on both on hill

slopes as well as on degraded and barren waste lands. The trenches break the slope and reduce

the velocity of surface runoff. It can be used in all slopes irrespective of rainfall conditions,

varying soil properties. For vegetative support forage grasses as well as economic trees can be

planted. Periodical maintenance by way of unearthing of the trenches and depositing on the

downhill side ought to be given due attention by the beneficiaries themselves. SCT are been

planned to be constructed in the hilly terrain where slope is not so steep.



iii). Border Contour Trenching:

Border contour trenches will be constructed to collect the runoff below the hills so that

plantation of trees can be taken up.

Slope treatment:

The second tier treatment is the Slope Treatment. This is generally done on agricultural

land or waste land. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage

structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) will be utilized as

a measure of Convergence.

Following structures are proposed in these areas:

i). Terracing

ii). Check Dams

iii). Earthen Bund

iv). Afforestation

v). Farm Ponds

vi). Agriculture Link Roads

vii). Water Harvest Tanks

Construction of agriculture link roads is much needed as 80% of the Project area is not

accessible by roads. Construction of roads will enable movement of goods and services as well as

ensure better implementation of works. A total length of 20 kms of roads will be constructed.

Cost for constructed of 8 kms of the road will be met from MGNREGS funds.

Construction of Check Dams, Farm Ponds and Water Harvesting Structures will ensure

conservation of water during the rainy season and thereby raise the water table. They will be

constructed across existing streams and rivers. They will serve as sources of irrigation for farms

and will also be used for aquaculture.

Afforestation and earth bunds will aid water and soil conservation, regenerate forests in

wastelands and barren lands as well as improve ecological balance in the wastelands.

Terraces will be constructed on all suitable lands for plantation of agriculture and

horticulture crops as well as for Wet Rice Cultivation. Cost for construction of terraces will be

converged with MGNREGS funds.



Table No. 18: Model Technical Specification of Stone Bund

Particulars Value Unit

Length of bund 3.60 M

Bottom with of bund 1.00 M

Top width 0.45 M

Depth above a ground level 0.60 M

Depth of foundation 0.20 M

No. of Units 5000 Nos

Table No. 19: Estimation for Stone Bund (Per Unit)

Sl. No.

Description No. L B H Qnty. Unit Rate Amount (In Rs)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Clearing grass and removal of rubbish upto a distance of 50m outside the periphery of the areas cleared. By manual means.

3.60 1.00

3.60 Sqm 3.40 12.24

2

Constructing hand packed dry stone walls with stone boulders including excavation in foundation trench, etc. including supply of stone, labour etc complete.

3.60 0.73 0.80 2.09 cum 1042 2175.70

TOTAL 2187.94

GRAND TOTAL Cost of Construction of 3000 Units

(2187.94x3000) 65,63,820.00

(Rupees Sixtyfive Lakhs, Sixtythree Thousand and Eight Hundred and Twenty) only



Table No. 20: Model Technical Specification of Staggered Contour Trenches (Per Unit)


Trench Length 17.5 M

Trench width 0.45 M

Trench Depth 0.45 M

No. of Trenches proposed for construction 16080 No.

Table No. 21: Cost Estimation of Staggered Contour Trenches

Sl. No. Description No. L B H Qnty. Unit Rate Amount

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Surface dressing of ground including removing vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15cm deep and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50m and lift upto 1.50m

1 30.00 0.75 22.50 Sqm 18.80 423.00

2

Earth works in excavation in foundation/Trenches etc. not exceeding 1.5m depth including dressing of side, ramming of bottom, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of surplus excavated soil upto 50m.

1 30.00 0.60 0.60 10.80 cum 151.90 1640.52

3 Sowing of seed on the constructed ridge 1 30.00 30 m 1.50 45.00

4 Supply of Stylo Seed @ 4 gm/m in two lines 2 30.00 2.4 kg 6.00 14.40

5

Overseeding of grasses in between two furrows including seed treatment and pellet making etc. complete @ 27gm/m

27 30.00 8.10 kg 8.50 68.85

TOTAL 2191.80 GRAND TOTAL

{ Cost of Construction of 5590 Units (2191.8x5590)} 122,52,156.00

(Rupees One Hundred Twentytwo Lakhs Fiftytwo Thousand One Hundred and Fiftysix) only



Table No. 22: Model Technical Specification of Bordered Contour Trenches (Per Unit)


1 2 3

Trench Length 30.00 M

Trench type Trapezoidal Trench depth 1.00 M Trench width 2.00 M Trench Top width 5.00 M Trench cross section 3.50 Sqm Total units 300.00 nos.

Table No. 23: Cost Estimation for Bordered Contour Trench

Sl. No. Description No. L W D Qnty. Unit Rate Amount

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Surface dressing of ground including removing vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15cm deep and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50m and lift upto 1.50m

30.00 2.00 60.00 Sgm 18.90 1134.00

2

Earth works in excavation in foundation/Trenches etc. not exceeding 1.5m depth including dressing of sides and ramming of bottom, refilling of blank spaces with soil and disposal of surplus excavated soil upto 50m. Ordinary Soil.

30.00 3.50 1.00 105.00 cum 151.90 15949.50

TOTAL 17083.50

GRAND TOTAL

{Cost of Construction of 300 Units(300x17083.50)} 5125050.00

(Rupees Fiftyone Lakhs, Twentyfive Thousand and Fifty) only



Table No. 24: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities (per Ha)


1 2 3

Crop Name Champ, Hollock, Toonaciliata etc.

Plant to Plant Spacing 8.00 m Row to Row Spacing 8.00 m Pit Length 0.90 m Pit Width 0.90 m Pit Depth 0.90 m No. of Plant per Hac 1250 No. Gap Filling 25 % Plantation Area (Per Unit) 1 Ha Total Plantation Area 100 Ha

Table No. 25: Per Unit Cost Estimation for Afforestation Activities (1Ha Area)


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Earthwork in excavation in trenches not exceeding 1.5m depth including dressing of sides and ramming of bottom, refilling of soil up to 0.20m and disposal of surplus soil lead upto 50m.

1250 0.75 0.75 0.75 527.34 cum 18.00 9492.19

2

Plants sampling for Plantation not less than 30cm height including loading and unloading of plants, Transportation of Plants from nursery to camp site upto 20km

1250 1250 Nos 17.40 21750.00

3 Rehandling of Plants from camp site to actual planting site up to 500m

1250 1250 Nos 1.50 1875.00

4 Weeding & Hoeing two times (twice in a year) 1250 1250 Nos 2.10 2625.00

TOTAL 35742.19Grand Total {for 100 Units (100 Ha) = (100x35742.19)} = Rs.35,74,219.00

(Rupees Thirtyfive Lakhs, Seventyfour Thousand, Twohundred and Nineteen)



Table No. 26: Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘A’

Sl. No. Description No. L B W Qnty. Uni

t Rate Amount

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08

Earthwork in excavation in foundation trenches etc not exceeding 2 m depth etc b) Hard Soil

Foundation 1 30.0

0 1.50

0.60 27.00 m3

2 3.00 1.00

0.60 3.60 m3

Total 30.60 m3 163.60 5006.16

2/7.03

Course rubble masonry with hard stone in foundation up to one storey above and below ground level including curing etc. complete. A.(c) In cement mortar 1:6

Check Dam Foundation. 1 30.0

0 1.20

0.40 14.40 m3

Apron. 1 30.00

1.00

0.15 4.50 m3

Total 18.90 m3 2948.70 55730.43 B.(b) In cement mortar 1:4 Check Dam superstructure above plinth level.

1 30.00

0.90

4.10

110.70 m3

Wing wall 2 3.00 0.7 4.50 19.71 m3

Total 130.41 m3 3784.10 493484.48

3/21.24

20mm cement plaster 1:3 finished with a floating coat of neat cement.

1 30.00

0.56 16.80 m2 247.50 4158.00

TOTAL = 558379.07

Add 21.90 % for cost index = 122285.02

GRAND TOTAL = 680664.09 SAY = 680660.00

For construction of 2 Units. @ Rs. 680660.00 = Rs. 1361320.00 (Rupees Thirteen Lakhs Sixtyone Thousand Three Hundred Twenty) only



Table No. 27: Model Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘B’


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08


Foundation 1 25.00 1.50 0.60 22.50 m3

2 3.00 1.00 0.60 3.60 m3

Total 26.10 m3 163.60 4269.96

2/7.03

Course rubble masonry with hard stone in foundation in to one storey above and below ground level including curing etc. complete. A.(c) In cement mortar 1:6

Check Dam Foundation. 1 25.00 1.20 0.4 12.00 m3 Apron. 1 25.00 1.00 0.15 3.75 m3


1 25.00 0.90 3.60 81.00 m3

Wing wall 2 3.00 0.73 3.60 15.77 m3 Total 96.77 m3 3784.10 366179.79

3/21.24


1 25.00 0.60 15.00 m2 247.50 3712.50

TOTAL = 420604.27

Add 21.90 % for cost index = 92112.34 GRAND TOTAL = 512716.61

SAY = 513000.00 For 5 Units @ Rs. 513000.00 = Rs. 25,65,000.00

(Rupees Twenty-five Lakhs and Sixty-five Thousand) only



Table No. 28: Cost Estimate for construction of Check Dam Type ‘C’


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1/2.08


Foundation 1 20.00 1.50 0.60 18.00 m3

2 3.00 1.00 0.60 3.60 m3

Total 21.60 m3 163.60 3533.76

2/7.03

Course rubble masonry with hard stone in foundation up to one storey above and below ground level including curring etc. complete. A.(c) In cement mortar 1:6

Check Dam Foundation. 1 20.00 1.20 0.2 4.80 m3 Apron. 1 20.00 1.00 0.2 3.00 m3


1 20.00 0.90 3.30 59.40 m3

Wing wall 2 3.00 0.73 3.30 14.45 m3 Total 73.85 m3 3784.10 279470.92

3/21.24


1 20.00 0.60 12.00 m2 247.50 2970.00

TOTAL = 308974.54

Add 21.90 % for cost index = 67665.42 GRAND TOTAL = 376639.97

SAY = 377000.00 For 6 Units. @ Rs. 377000.00 = Rs. 22,62,000.00 (Rupees Twentytwo Lakhs Sixtytwo Thousand) only



Table No. 29: Model Technical Details of Earthen Bund

Particulars Value Units

1 2 3

Structure length 20.00 m

No. of Earth Bund 150 No.

Structure height 1.30 m

Bund top width 0.90 m

Base width 2.90 m

Structure Cross‐section area 1.90 Sqm

Downstream slope 1:1

Upstream slope 2:1

Table No. 30: Cost Estimation of Earthen Bund

Sl.No Description Unit No. Length Width Height Quantity Rate Amount (In

Rupees)

1.

Clearing grass, bush, sapling etc. by manual means

Sqm 1 20.00 4.00 80.00 2.4 192.000

2.

Earthwork in excavation including breaking of clods etc. with combine lead upto 15 metres. Ordinary soil

Cum 1 20.00 1.90 1.00 38.00 55.40 2105.2

Total 2297.20

Grand Total For Construction of 150 Units (2297.20x150) = Rs.344580.00

(Rupees Three Lakhs Fortyfour Thousand, Five Hundred and Eighty) Only



Table No.31: Model per Unit Estimate for Construction of Agriculture Link Road

(1 Unit=1000m)

(As per PWD (MZ) SOR 2008 Rural Road)

Estimate for Cost of Survey (Per Unit):

Sl. No. Description Unit No L

(m) W(m)

H/D(m) Qty Rate


1 2 6 3 4 5 7 8

PRELIMINARY SURVEY

1/2.2

Jungle clearance for Initial Stage (i) By Manual means: (a) In area of thorny Jungle:

m2 1 1000 1 1000.00 2.277 2277.00

DETAILED SURVEY

2/2.2 Jungle clearance for Detailed Survey (i) By Manual means:

m2 1 1000 1.5 1500.00 2.277 3415.50

TRACE PATH CUTTING

3/8.3

Earthwork in Hill road. (i)Excavation in hilly area in Soil by Manual means

m3 1 1000 0.6 0.45 270 74.00 19980.00

TOTAL: 25672.50

(Rupees Twentyfive Thousand Six hundred Seventytwo) only.



Detailed Estimate (per Unit):

Sl. No. Description Unit L

(m) W (m) Qty Rate


1 2 6 3 4 5 7 8

1/2.2

Clearing and Grubbing of road length including uprooting wildvegetation, shrubs, etc. complete (i) Manual means (A) in area of Trony jungle

Ha 1000.00 3.50 0.35 26638.00 9323.30

2/2.3

Cutting of Trees including cutting of trunks, and removal of stumps and roots, compection of back filling etc.

(i) Grith above 300mm-600mm No 28 103.00 2884.00

(ii) Grith above 600mm-900mm No 22 192.00 4224.00 (iii) Grith above 900mm-1800mm No 10 360.00 3600.00

3/8.3

(ii)(A) Excavation in hilly area by Mechanical means m3 Qty taken from E/W

Table 3920.54 55.00 215629.43

(iv) Excavation in hilly area in ordinary rock not required blasting by Mechanical means

m3 Qty taken from E/W Table 1195.22 95.00 113545.43

Sub-total: 349206.16 For Surveying ( Detailed Survey Estimate attached): 25672.50

Total: 3,75,000.00 GRAND TOTAL: For Construction of 8 Units (8 x 375000.00) = Rs. 30,00,000.00

(Rupees Thirty Lakhs) only

Table No. 32: Model Technical Details of Farm Pond


1 2 3

Pond Length 15.00 M

Pond Width

Pond Depth 2.4 M

Side slope 2:1



Table No. 33: Cost Estimation of Farm Pond

Sl. No

Description No. Unit Length Width Height Qnty Rate Amount (In Rupees)

1 Clearing bushes, vegetation etc. by manual means

1 Sqm 15 5.6 84.00 2.40 210.60

2

Earthwork in excavation including breaking of clods etc. with combined lead upto 15 m. Ordinary soil

1 Cum 15 15.00 2.4 540.00 55.40 29916.00

TOTAL 30126.60

GRAND TOTAL (for construction of 15 Units@ Rs. 30126.60 per Unit) 451899.00

SAY 451855.00

(Rupees Four Lakhs, Fiftyone Thousand Eight Hundred and Fiftyfive) only

7.3.4: Activities under Farm Production System

The following activities will be taken up under Farm Production System:

• Bamboo Cultivation

• Passion fruit Cultivation

• Arecanut Cultivation

• Greenhouse farming/Protected Cultivation

• Rubber Cultivation

They have been found to be most suitable with reference to the climate and soil in the

project area and also taking into consideration the readily available market for these products.

They will be intercropped with other vegetables and plants such as banana, bird’s eye chillies,

tomato etc.



Table No. 34: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Bamboo Cultivation

Unit Area : 2 Hectares. Unit Cost : Rs. 2, 50,000.00 I. MAIN TRADE: SN Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)

First Year

i) Planting materials (clump) 2500 nos. 10.00 25,000.00

ii) Tools & Implements LS LS 4,500.00

iii) Area preparation 200 MD 132.00 26,400.00

iv) Fire Prevention Line 180 MD 132.00 23,760.00

v) Pit Digging and Contour Bund 120 MD 132.00 15,840.00

vi) Construction of Contour Bund 100 MD 132.00 13,200.00

vii) Transportation LS LS 4,500.00

Total of 1st Year 1,13,200.00

Second Year

i) Water Storage Tank (2000 litres each) 2 Nos. 8/lit 32,000.00

ii) PVC pipe LS 14,000.00

iii) Fire Prevention Line 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

iv) Weeding 90 MD 132.00 11,880.00

Total of 2nd Year 68,440.00

Third Year

i) Fire Prevention Line 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

ii) Weeding 90 MD 132.00 11,880.00

Total of 3rd Year 22,440.00

Grand Total of 1st + 2nd + 3rd Year 2,04,080.00

II. SUBSIDIARY TRADE:

SN Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)

A. Vegetable garden (800 Sq.m)

i) Land Preparation including construction of contour bunds

40MD 132.00 5,280.00

ii) Vegetable seeds LS LS 2,090.00

iii) Weeding (3 times) 40MD 132.00 5,280.00

iv) Organic manure/FYM LS LS 2,000.00

v) Transportation and handling LS LS 1,000.00

Sub Total of A 15,650.00



B. Poultry (100 sq. m)

i) Chicks 100 Nos. 45.00 4,500.00

ii) Poultry feed LS LS 4,000.00

iii) Poultry shed LS LS 5,000.00

iv) Sanitation/Health Care LS LS 1590.00

v) Transportation and Handling LS LS 1090.00

Sub Total of B 16,180.00

C. Piggery (100 sq.m)

i) Piglet 2 Nos. 3000.00 6,000.00

Ii) Pig Feed LS LS 3,000.00

iii) Pig Sty 1 no. LS 4,000.00

iv) Sanitation/Health Care LS LS 1000.00

vi) Transportation and Handling LS LS 1,090.00

Sub Total of C 14,090.00

Total of II( A + B + C) 45,920.00

Total of I + II 2,50,800.00

III. COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS:

Year Trade Cost Income Net Income

1

Bamboo 1,13,200.00 (‐)1,13,200.00

Vegetable garden 15,650.00 I9,719.00 (+)4,069.00

Poultry 16,180.00 33,800.00 (+)17,620.00

Piggery 14,090.00 33,050.00 (+)18,960.00

SubTotal 1,59,120.00 86,569.00 ()72,551.00

2

Bamboo 68,440.00 (‐) 68,440.00


Poultry 16,180.00 33,800.00 (+)17,620.00

Piggery 14,090.00 33,050.00 (+)18,960.00

Sub Total 1,14,360.00 86,569.00 ()27,791.00

3

Bamboo 22,440.00 (‐)22,440.00


Poultry 16,180.00 33,800.00 (+)17,620.00

Piggery 14,090.00 33,050.00 (+)18,960.00

Sub Total 68,360.00 86,569.00 (+)18,209.00



Table No. 35: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Passion fruit Cultivation

Unit Area : 2 Hectares. Unit Cost : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

Sl. No.

Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.)

Amount (Rs.)

I. 1st Year

i) Seedlings 5000 nos. 3.00 15,000.00

ii) G.I. wire 16.0 qtls. 7950.00 1,27,200.00

iii) Pit digging and planting 60 MD 132.00 7,920.00

iv) Collection of wooden post 60 MD 132.00 7,920.00

v) Erection of trailing (pergola) 60 MD 132.00 7,920.00

vi) Weeding 100 MD 132.00 13,200.00

vii) Transportation L.S L.S 4000.00

Total of 1st Year 1,83,160.00

II. 2nd Year

i) Secateur (+12% CST) 2 no. 396.00 792.00

ii) Sprayer 2 no. 1500.00 3,000.00

iii) Water storage tank 3000 lts 8.00 24,000.00

iv) PVC Pipe L.S L.S 8,000.00

v) P.P. measures L.S L.S 4,000.00

vi) Pruning 14 MD 132.00 1848.00

vii) Weeding 100 MD 132.00 13,200.00

viii) Organic manure 10 qtls. 1200.00 12,000.00


G. Total of I+II 2,50,000.00

4

Bamboo 1,20,000.00 (+) 1,20,000.00


Poultry 16,180.00 33,800.00 (+)17,620.00

Piggery 14,090.00 33,050.00 (+)18,960.00

Sub Total 45,920.00 1,80,650.00 (+) 1,34,730.00



COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS:

1. 1st Year

i) Expected yield / ha. = 175 qtls.

ii) Returns from sale of 175 qtls. @ Rs. 1,000/qtl. = Rs. 1,75,000.00

2. 2nd Year

i) Expected yield/ha = 250 qtls.

ii) Returns from sale of 250 qtls. @ Rs. 1,000/qtl. = Rs. 2, 50,000.00

3. Gross income upto 2nd Year = Rs. 4,25,000.00

Income will be stabilized from 3rd year onwards @ 500 qtls Per Unit.

Table No. 36: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Arecanut Cultivation

Unit Area : 2 Hectares. Unit Cost : Rs. 2,50,000.00

Sl. No.

Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)

I. First Year

i) Arecanut seedlings 3200 nos. 8.00 25,600.00

ii) Birds eye chilli 4kg. 300.00 1,200.00

iii) Water Storage Tank 3000 lts 8.00 24,000.00

iv) PVC Pipe L.S. L.S. 12,000.00

v) Organic manure 16 qtls. 1,200.00 19,200.00

vi) Pit digging, planting & broad casting 160 MD 132.00 21,120.00

vii) Irrigation 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

viii) Weeding 90 MD 132.00 11,880.00

ix) Transportation L.S. L.S. 4,000.00

Total of 1st year 1,29,560.00

II. Second Year

i) Organic manure 16 qtls. 1,200.00 19,200.00

ii) Plant Protection Measures L.S. L.S. 4,000.00

iii) Plant nutrients L.S. L.S. 5,000.00



iv) Sprayer 2 no. 1,500.00 3,000.00

v) Irrigation 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

vi) Weeding 90 MD 132.00 11,880.00

vii) Application of Plant Protection measures & Plant nutrients 60MD 132.00 7,920.00

viii) Transportation L.S. L.S 2,000.00


III. Third Year

i) Organic manure 20qtls. 1,200.00 24,000.00

ii) Irrigation 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

iii) Weeding 90 MD 132.00 11,880.00

iv) Application of Plant Protection measures & Plant nutrients 60MD 132.00 7,920.00

v) Transportation L.S. L.S 2,520.00

Total of 3rd Year 56,880.00

G. Total of I+II+III 2,50,000.00

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS:

1. 1st Year ‐ 6th Year i) Expected yield = 40 qtls. (Dried) (Birds eye chilli each year) ii) Expected returns @ Rs. 8,000 per qtl. = Rs. 3, 20,000.00 2. 7th Year i) Expected yield @ 250 nuts/ tree = 6, 40,000.00 nuts ii) Expected returns @ Rs. 0.75 per nut. = Rs. 4, 80,000.00 3. Gross Income = Rs. 8, 00,000.00 Yield will be stable from 8th year @ Rs. 4, 00,000 nos. of nuts/ha.



Table No. 37: Per Unit Cost analyses for Greenhouse farming

Green House Area : 1000 sq.mt.

Crop : Vegetables/ Flowers

Unit Cost : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

Main Trade:

Sl. No.


Amount (Rs.)

1 U.V. film for roof 1650 sqm. 50.00 82,500.00

2 Shade net for side wall 960 sqm. 45.00 43,200.00

3 Materials like local timbers and bamboo for structures L.S L.S 69,000.00

4 Nails, strings etc. L.S L.S 3,500.00

5 Construction of Green House 55 MD 132.00 7,260.00

6 Land development and preparation of beds 25 MD 132.00 3,300.00

7 Manures (FYM) 700 tins 15.00 10,500.00

8 Seeds/ Plants L.S L.S 6,600.00

9 Operational Cost 80 MD 132.00 10,560.00

10 Transportation of Inputs L.S L.S 13,580.00

Total

2,50,000.00



7.3.5: Activities under Livelihood Production System

The main activities to be taken up under Livelihood Production System are specifically

aimed at those who are asset less. Trainings will be provided to all proposed beneficiaries before

provision of funds. They will be assisted either in groups (after formation of SHGs) or as

individuals. The Project will provide funds upto a maximum of Rs.2.50 Lakhs per SHG and

Rs.25000.00 per individual. Initially, each SHG and individual will be provided one Unit of each

activity/Trade. Additional units will be provided upon performance to deserving groups and

individuals. Main activities proposed to be taken up under Livelihood Production System are as

follows:‐

• Dairy farming

• Poultry farming (Layer)

• Poultry farming (Broiler)

• Hill cattle/Methuen rearing

• Goat/Sheep rearing

• Pig rearing

• Aquaculture

• Vermin‐Composting

• Electronic goods Servicing

• Carpentry

• Petty Trade

• Tailoring

The list of activities is not exhaustive. SHGs/Individuals may take up other activities as

per its interest and capacities.

Table No. 38: Per Unit CostBenefit Analyses for Dairy Farming

Unit Size : 4 Cross – Bred Cows Unit Cost : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

Sl.No Particulars Unit Total A. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE :

1) Cost of construction of Byre ( Cowshed) – 60 sqft per cow @ Rs.250 /‐ per sqft ( i.e 60 x 4 = 240 sqft) for 4 cows 2) Cost of equipments like Allmn. Bucket for milking , Allmn. Dekchi and milk can etc. 3) Water Storage Tank @ Rs.8/‐ per Litre.

L.S 2750 Lits capacity

Rs.60,000.00

Rs. 4,000.00

Rs.22,000.00

TOTAL : Rs. 84,000.00



B. RECURRING EXPENDITURE : 1) Cost of 4‐ Dairy Cows @ Rs. 35,000/‐,per cow including transportation cost. 2) Cost of feeds up to 1 months @ 3kg per cow per day @ Rs. 10/‐ per kg of feeds 3) Insurance premium @ Rs. 6.5% of original cost for 4 cows ( i.e. 4 x 2600.00) 4) Veterinary Aids including Vaccines and Medicines etc. @Rs.500/‐per cow

L.S

Rs.1,40,000.00

Rs. 3,600.00

Rs. 10,400.00

Rs. 2,000.00

TOTAL Rs1,56,000.00C. Land preparation for Kitchen gardening Rs. 8,000.00 Total Unit Cost (A+B+C+D) Rs. 2,50,000.00 COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS: E. GROSS INCOME FOR ONE YEAR

1) Sale of 5400 lits of milk. Average 10 lits Per cow per day for 270 days @ Rs. 25/‐ per lit 2) Sale of manure ( cow dung)

L.S

Rs. 2,70,000.00

Rs. 10,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 2,80,000.00

F. EXPENDITURE FOR ONE YEAR : 1) Cost of feeds for 365 days @ 3kg.cow/ day @ Rs. 10/‐ per kg of feeds 2) Insurance premium @ Rs. 6.5% of original cost 3) Veterinary Aids & Medicine and Vaccines etc

L.S

Rs.43,800.00

Rs.10,400.00

Rs. 2,000.00 TOTAL Rs. 56,200.00 NET INCOME FOR ONE YEAR

( i.e. E F ) Rs. 2,80,000 – 56,200.00

Rs.2,23,800.00



Table No. 39: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Poultry farming (Layer)

Unit Size : 400 Nos Unit Cost : Rs: 2, 50,000.00

A.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE: i) Construction of layer house with locally available materials with tin roofing @ 1.02 sqft per bird (i.e 1.02 sqft x 400 birds) = 408 sqft at the rate of Rs. 150/‐ per sqft. ii)Cost of feeding trough & water trough etc.

L.S

Rs. 61,200.00

Rs. 10,000.00

SubTotal

Rs.71,200.00

B.

RECURRING EXPENDITURE : i) Cost of Day –old chicks @ Rs. 35/‐ per chick For 400 chicks. ii) Cost of feed upto 8 months: Chick mash: 0 – 8 weeks (2 months) @ 45gm/chick/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg Grower Mash 8 – 20 weeks (3 months) @ 100gms/chick/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg Layer mash 20 – 32 weeks (3 months) @ Rs.140gm/bird/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg iii) Vety Aids including vaccine & medicines etc. @ Rs. 20/‐ per bird

Rs. 14,000.00

Rs. 14,040.00

Rs. 46,800.00

Rs. 65,520.00

Rs. 6,000.00

SubTotal

Rs. 1,46,360.00

C. Land Development for Kitchen gardening

L.S Rs.12,440.00

D. Electrification of layer house etc.

Rs. 4,000.00

E. Water harvesting facilities @ Rs. 8/‐ per lit 2000 lit Capacity

Rs. 16,000.00

GRAND TOTAL INVESTMENT COST

(i.e A+B+C+D+E)

Rs. 2,50,000.00



.

COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS: GROSS INCOME FOR THE FIRST ONE – YEAR 1) Sale of eggs – 180 eggs per bird @ Rs.5.00 per egg (i.e 180X400 birds) = 72,000 eggs

Rs. 3,60,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 3,60,000.00

EXPENDITURE FOR THE FIRST YEAR 1) Cost of feeds : a) Chick mash ‐ @ 2.7kg per bird ( 0‐8) weeks ) @ Rs.13/‐ per kg b) Grower mash ‐ @ 9kg per bird ( 8‐20 weeks) @ Rs.13/‐ per kg c) Layer mash ‐@ 12.6kg per bird ( 24‐32) weeks) @ Rs.13/‐ per Kg 2) Veterinary Aids including Vaccines and Medicines etc @ Rs.20/‐ per bird

Rs. 14,040.00

Rs. 46,800.00

Rs. 65,520.00

Rs 8,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 1,34,360.00

NET INCOME FOR ONE YEAR : Rs. Rs. 3,60,000.00 ‐ Rs. 1,34,360.00

Rs.2,25,640.00

Table No. 40: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Poultry farming (Broiler)

Unit Size : 400 Broilers Per Unit : Rs: 2, 50,000.00

A.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE i) Construction of layer house with locally available materials with tin roofing @ 1.02 sqft per bird ( i.e 1.02 sqft x 400 birds) = 204 sqft at the rate of Rs. 150/‐ per sqft. ii) Cost of feeding trough & water trough etc.

L.S

Rs. 61,200.00

Rs. 15,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 72,200.00

B.

RECURRING EXPENDITURE : i) Cost of Day –old chicks @ Rs. 35/‐ per chick For 400 chicks.

Rs. 14,000.00



ii) Cost of feed upto 8 months: Chick mash: 0 – 8 weeks (2 months) @ 45gm/chick/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg Grower Mash 8 – 20 weeks (3 months) @ 100gms/chick/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg Layer mash 20 – 32 weeks (3 months) @ Rs.140gm/bird/day at the rate of Rs. 13.00 per kg iii) Vety Aids including vaccine & medicines etc. @ Rs. 20/‐ per bird

Rs. 14,040.00

Rs. 46,800.00

Rs. 65,520.00

Rs. 6,000.00

SubTotal

Rs. 1,46,360.00

C.

Land Development for Kitchen gardening

L.S Rs. 10,500.00

D.

Electrification of layer house etc.

LS Rs. 8,050.00

E. Water harvesting facilities @ Rs. 8/‐ per lit 2000 lit Rs. 16,000.00

TOTAL INVESTMENT COST (A+B+C+D+E)

Rs.2,50,000.00

F.

COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS; GROSS INCOME FOR THE FIRST CYCLE

1) Sale of 370 broilers @ Rs.200.00 per kg One broiler attains 3 kg at 3 months (370 x 3 kg x Rs. 200.00)

Rs.2,22,000.00

TOTAL Rs.2,22,000.00

Income for 1 Year (4Cycles) =4x2,22,000

G.TOTAL Rs .8,88,000.00



G.

EXPENDITURE FOR THE FIRST CYCLE 1) Cost of Day –old chicks @ Rs. 35/‐ per chick For 400 chicks. 2) Cost of feeds : a) Chick mash ‐ @ 1.8kg per bird ( 0‐4) weeks ) @ Rs.13/‐ per kg b) Grower mash ‐ @ 3.6kg per bird (4‐8 weeks) @ Rs.13/‐ per kg c) Finisher mash ‐@ 6.6kg per bird (8‐12) weeks) @ Rs.13/‐ per Kg 3) Veterinary Aids including Vaccines and Medicines etc @ Rs.30/‐ per bird

14,000.00

Rs. 9,360.00

Rs. 18,720.00

Rs. 34,320.00

Rs. 12,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 84,400.00

Expenditure for 1 Year (4Cycles) =4x84,400

G.TOTAL Rs. 3,45,600.00

NET INCOME FOR ONE YEAR : (i.e. F‐G ) Rs .8,88,000.00 3,45,600.00

TOTAL

Rs . 5,42,400.00

Table No. 41: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Hill cattle/Methuen rearing

Unit Size : 8 FEMALE + 2 MALE UNITS Cost Per Unit : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

A. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE :

1) Construction of cattle shed for night shelter. Half

wall, Tin roofing with locally available materials.

(25’ x 12’ )

L.S Rs. 38,000.00

TOTAL : Rs. 25,000.00

B. RECURRING EXPENDITURE :

1) Cost of 20 local cattle of average 6 months old @

Rs. 8,000/‐ (2 male + 18 female cattle )

Rs. 1,60,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 1,60,000.00

C. Land Development for Kitchen gardening L.S Rs. 12,000.00



D. Construction of watering trough @ Rs. 8/‐ per lit 3000litres

Rs. 24,000.00

E. Veterinary Aids casting L.S Rs. 6,000.00

F. Cost of Min. Mixture, casting rope, farm implements

etc.

L.S Rs. 10,000.00

TOTAL INVESTMENT COST

(A+B+C+D+E+F)

Rs. 2,50,000.00

COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS: GROSS INCOME Sale of 20 cattle at the end of the 1st year attaining 120 kg body wt at 18 months, @ Rs. 150/‐ kg of meat

Rs. 3,60,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 3,60,000.00

RECURRING EXPENDITURE (To be borne by beneficiary from income of 1st year) 1) cost of 20 local cattle of average 6 months old @ Rs. 8000/‐ per cattle as replacement stock. 2) cost of mineral mixtures, vaccines and vitamins @ Rs. 500/‐ per cow 3) Veterinary aids, medicines etc @ Rs. 300/‐ per animal

Rs. 1,60,000.00

Rs. 10,000.00

Rs. 6,000.00 TOTAL Rs, 1,76,000.00

NET INCOME FOR ONE YEAR (Rs. 3,60,000.00 ‐ Rs. 1,76,000.00) :

Rs. 1,84,000,00



Table No. 42: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Goat/Sheep rearing

Unit Size : 96 FEMALE + 4 MALE Per Unit : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

A. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE :

1) Construction of House for night shelter with locally available materialist 4sqft / goat = 400sqft @ with tin roofing.

L.S

Rs. 40,000.00

TOTAL : Rs. 40,000.00 B. RECURRING EXPENDITURE :

1) Cost of foundation stock 96 female goat + 4 male goat of 3 months old @ Rs. 800/‐ per kg live weight 2) purchase of Minerals & Vets lick 3) Veterinary Aids including Vaccines and Medicines etc

L.S L.S

Rs. 80,000.00

Rs. 6,000.00

Rs. 5,000.00

TOTAL : Rs. 91,000.00 C. Land Development for Kitchen gardening L.S Rs. 15,000.00

D. Construction of watering trough @ Rs. 8/‐ per lit 3000 Lits Rs. 24,000.00

E. Fencing with Barbed wire L.S Rs. 80,000.00

TOTAL INVESTMENT COST (i.e. A+B+C+D+E)

Rs. 2,50,000.00

COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS:

GROSS INCOME FOR THE FIRST YEAR :

1) Sale of 200 nos. of young goats assuming 50% of goat kidded twice a year and the goat has attained 5kgs live weight per kid @ Rs. 800/‐ per kid

Rs. 1,60,000.00

G. TOTAL Rs. 1,60,000.00EXPENDITURE FOR THE FIRST YEAR :

1) Veterinary Aids including vaccination and medication 2) Purchase of Mineral mixture & vets licks etc

Rs. 5,000.00

Rs. 6,000.00 H. TOTAL Rs. 11,000.00 NET INCOME FOR THE FIRST – YEAR

( i.e. G ‐ H = Rs. 1,60,000 – Rs.11,000 )

Rs.1,49,000.00



Table No. 43: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Pig rearing

Unit Size : 4 SOWS + 10 FATTENERS Cost Per Unit : Rs. 2, 50,000.00

Sl.No.

Particulars Unit Total

A. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE : 1) Cost of construction of 4 Farrowing Pen (i.e. 12’ x 6’ x2) = 144 sqft. with locally available materials @ Rs. 200/‐ per sqft. 2) Cost of construction of 10 fatteners sty (i.e. 16’.02 x 6’x 2) = 192.2 sqft with locally available Materials @ Rs. 200/‐ per sqft. 3) Cost of construction of piglets box. 4) Cost of utensils like Allmn. Bucket / Dekchi

L.S L.S

Rs. 28,800.00

Rs. 38,440.00

Rs. 4,000.00Rs. 8,000.00

TOTAL Rs. 77,240.00 B. RECURRING EXPENDITURE :

1) Cost of foundation stock of 14nos. of piglets ( 4 female + 10 male for fatteners ) of 2 months old @ Rs. 3500 /‐ per piglet 2) Cost of conc feed upto 6 months for fatterners @ 3 qtls./ Pig at the rate of Rs. 12/per kg of feeds. 3) Cost of conc. feed upto 12 months for 4 Sow @ Rs. 5.70 qtls./ sow @ Rs. 12/‐ per kg of feeds. 4) Veterinary Aids including purchase of vaccines & medicines, A.I & boar Service

Rs.49,000.00

Rs. 50,400.00

Rs. 27,360.00

Rs. 5,000.00 TOTAL Rs. 1,31,760.00

C. Land Development for Kitchen Gardening L.S Rs. 15,000.00D. Water Harvesting Facility @ Rs. 8/‐ per lit. 3000 lit. Cap. Rs. 24,000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT COST (A+B+C+D) Rs. 2,50,000.00

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS GROSS INCOME FOR THE FIRST ONE YEAR 1) Sale of 10 nos of fatteners ; assuming 90kgs/ fattener @ Rs.200/‐ per kg of pork 2) Sale of 36 piglets @ Rs. 3500/‐ per piglet EXPENDITURE FOR ONE YEAR :

1) Cost of Conc. feeds 2) Veterinary Aids including vaccines & medicines, A.I. & Boar Service charge NET INCOME FOR ONE YEAR : ( Rs. 3,06,000.00 ‐ . 80,760.00)

Rs.1,80,000.00

Rs. 1,26,000.00

Rs. 77,760.00

Rs. 3,000.00

Rs. 3,06,000.00 Rs. 80,760.00

Rs. 2,25,240.00



Table No. 44: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Aquaculture

Unit Area : 2 Hectares. Unit Cost : Rs. 2, 50,000.00 A. Capital Investment 1) Construction of 2.0 ha of new pond (1.8 ha main pond and 0.2 ha

rearing pond) as per unit cost of FFDA (GOI).

2) Nets and gears (1 dragnet, 2 hand nets)

Rs.2,00,000.00 Rs. 8,000.00

Subtotal ‘A’: Rs.2,08,000.00 B. Annual Recurring Expenditure 1) Slaked lime 500kg/ha for 2 Ha – 1000kg @ Rs.4.780/Ha

2) Fish seed (fry for raising 15,000 to 20,000nos of 100mm size

fingerling in the rearing tank to stock the main pond) 30,000nos of fry per unit @ Rs.160.00 per 1000nos

3) Organic manure – Raw cowdung at a dose of 10 M.T/Ha for 2Ha‐20 M.T @ Rs.0.40/kg

4) Inorganic Fertilizer:‐ 1) Urea – 300kg/ha @ Rs.10.00/kg for 600kg 2) SSP – 240kg/ha @ Rs.9.00/kg for 480kg 3) Micro nutrient – 12kg/ha @ Rs.150.00/kg for 24kg

5) Fish feed – Concentrated/Palleted at a dose of 700kg/unit @

Rs.1500/qtl

Rs. 4,780.00 Rs. 4,800.00 Rs. 8,000.00 Rs. 6,000.00 Rs. 4,320.00 Rs. 3,600.00 Rs. 10,500.00

Subtotal ‘B’: Rs. 42,000.00 TOTAL A+B: Rs.2,50,000.00

C. Economic Return of the Unit 1. Gross Return

i) Production of table size fish @ 2000kg/ha from 2.0 Ha ii) Gross annual sale proceed/income from 4000kg of fish @

Rs.120/kg 2. Investment

i) Capital investment per unit ii) Annual recurring expenditure iii) Depreciation of capital investment presuming lifetime at 15

years iv) Cost on Annual repair on 3rd, 6th and 9th year, 10% of capital

investment v) Total of ARE, Depreciation and Annual repair (ii+iii+iv)

3. Net Annual Revenue/Profit 4. BCR of the Unit at NPV

4000kg Rs.4,80,000.00

Rs.2,08,000.00 Rs. 50,000.00 Rs. 20,800.00 Rs. 62,400.00 Rs.1,33,200.00 Rs.3,46,800.00 2.30



Vermicomposting :

If farmers realise the benefits of compost and vermicompost in particular, the

productivity of their land can increase manifold. As part of direct livelihood support, the

villagers (mainly land less) are going to receive cows, buffaloes and small ruminants. These

animals in turn will produce waste, which can be used to prepare Vermicompost. It is planned

that a vermicompost unit by one SHG would be supported by the project. The SHG members,

with the help of hired manpower, can collect animal‐dung. They will process this dung to

prepare vermicompost and sell it to the farmers in the village or outside, as per demand.

The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the

agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers of 1.5 m wide and 0.9 m high beds of required length.

Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds

are maintained at about 40 ‐ 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 ‐ 30o C by sprinkling

water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter

and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi‐castings. Vermi compost has more nutrient

compare to other manures and fertilizer; so, by the use of vermicompost use of chemical

fertilizer can be reduced. Vermicompost not only supply nutrient but also improve quantity of

hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient

holding capacities of soil.

Components of a commercial unit: 1. Sheds:

Sheds can be made by the use of concrete pillars. While designing the sheds adequate

room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labourers attending to the filling

and harvesting the beds.

2. Vermibeds: An ideal bed size is 75 cm ‐ 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage

of excess water. The whole bed area should be above ground. The bed should have a uniform

height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed

volumes. The proper bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre

of the bed.

3. Land: About 125 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermin compost production

unit. It should have at least 2‐3 sheds each of about 180‐200 sq.ft. It should have a good watering

arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is essential for vermicompost

production.



4. Seed Stock: This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m3 of

bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.

Estimate for a vermicompost unit:

• Requirement of nitrogen for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production=90 kg.

• 1.6% N available in vermin compost.

• 90 kg N fulfill by the use of 90/1.6*100= 5625 kg vermicompost (5.5 ton).

• Need of vermicompost to fulfill the requirement of nitrogen for 15 hectare

5.5*15 =82.5 (80 ton).

• 45 kg phosphorus required for 1 hectare sorghum fodder production.

• Requirement of phosphorus for 15 hectare fodder production 15*45=675 kg.

• Supply of phosphorus through vermin compost 0.7/100*80000=560 kg.

• Remaining requirement of phosphorus 675‐560=115 kg.

• Remaining dose of phosphorus will be supplied by rock phosphate.

• 8 cycles of 45 days each will be required for 80 ton vermin compost

production.

Table No. 45: Model Cost Estimation for A VermiCompost Unit

S. No


Amount (Rs.)

1 Wooden ballies (3 m long) 20 50 1000 2 Wooden (4 m long) 25 60 1500 3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 25 3125 4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies & mats 20 Kg 50 1000 5 Labour charges for erection of sheds 35MD 132 4620 6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets, 2500 7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2000 2000 8 Cow dung 10 ton 800 8000 9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 kg 80 2400 10 Formation of vermin bed with agro‐waste, cow

dung and worms 20 bed 250 5000

11 Miscellaneous

Total cost 31,250

Cost for 8 cycles 2,50,000



Costbenefit Analysis: Benefits

1. Sale of vermin compost of 80 tones @ Rs.3750/‐per ton 80*3500 = Rs. 3,00,000

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 60 per kg 400*60 = Rs. 24,000

Total Rs. 3,24,000

Net benefit Rs. 3,24,000 Rs.2,50,000 = Rs. 74,000

Table No. 46: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Electronic Goods Servicing

Per Unit Cost: Rs. 25, 000.00

A. Capital expenditure:

1) Land and Building : Self Owned

2) Plant and Machinery

a) Welding Transformer : Rs. 5,000.00

b) Digital Millimetre : Rs. 3,000.00

c) Soldering pump etc. : Rs. 3,500.00

3) Fixture and Furniture

a) Table, Chair, Bench, Tools box, etc. : Rs. 1,500.00

Total : Rs. 13,000.00

B. Recurring Expenditure For The Month

1) Raw materials

a) Welding Rod etc. : Rs. 3,000.00

2) Other Expenditures

a) Advertisement, Electricity,

Stationery, water etc. : Rs. 1,000.00

Total : Rs. 4,000.00

3) Staff

a) Manager : Proprietor self : Nil

b) Mechanic/Welder : Rs. 6,000.00

c) Helper 1 No. @ Rs. 2,500/‐ : Rs. 2,000.00

Total : Rs. 8,000.00

4) Total of recurring expenditure : Rs. 12,000.00



C. COST OF THE PROJECT

1) Towards fixed Assets : Rs. 13,000.00

2) Towards working capital : Rs. 12,000.00

Total : Rs. 25,000.00

Table No. 47: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Carpentry


A. Capital expenditure:

1) Land and Building : Self Owned

2) Tools & Equipments

a) 2 Sets of carpentry tools @ Rs. 4,500.00 : Rs. 9,000.00

b) Pre operative expenses like installation of power: Rs. 1,500.00

Total : Rs. 10,500.00

B. Working Capital

1) Raw materials

a) Sawn wood 20cft @ 250.00 : Rs. 5,000.00

b) Nails, Fevicol, Plywood, Ply board, Nuts & Bolts, etc.: Rs. 2,500.00

Total : Rs. 7,500.00

2) Staff

a) Manager : Self

b) Semi Skill @ Rs. 4,500.00 : Rs. 4,500.00

c) Helper @ Rs. 2,500.00 : Rs. 2,500.00

Total : Rs. 7,000.00

3) Total of recurring expenditure : Rs. 14,500.00 C. Cost of The Project

1) Towards fixed Assets : Rs. 10,500.00

2) Towards working capital : Rs. 14,500.00

Grand Total : Rs. 25,000.00



Table No. 48: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Petty Trade


A. Furnishing of Shop

1) Furniture (Table, Rack, Almirah) : Rs. 5000.00 2) Skilled Laborer Charge (Carpenter) : Rs. 1000.00 3) Unskilled Laborer charge (Helper) : Rs. 600.00

Sub TotalI : Rs. 6600.00

B. Working Capital Per Month

1) Food Items (Dal, Salt, Sugar, etc.) : Rs. 10000.00 2) Sweets, Gums, etc. : Rs 4000.00 3) Others (Shop, Tooth Brush, etc.) : Rs 4400.00 SubTotalII : Rs. 18400.00

Grand Total {(I+II) = Rs. (6600 + 13400)} : Rs. 25000.00

C. Expected Production Per Month:

1) Food Items (Dal, Salt, Sugar, etc.) : Rs. 12200.00 2) Sweets, Gums, etc. : Rs 5290.00 3) Others (Shop, Tooth Brush, etc.) : Rs 5910.00

Total : Rs. 23400.00

D. Net Profit per Month C‐B = Rs. (23400 – 18400) : Rs. 5000.00

E. Expected expenditure for the 1st year

Rs. 6600 + Rs. (18400x 12) : Rs. 227400.00

F. Expected Production for the 1st Year Rs. 23400 X 12 : Rs. 280800.00

G. Net Profit For The 1st Year F– E = Rs. (Rs. 280800 – 227400) : Rs. 53400.00

H. Net Profit from 2nd Year Onwards : Rs. 60000.00



Table No. 49: Per Unit Costbenefit analyses for Tailoring


1 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE:

Land and Building

Plant and Machinery

a) Foot Sewing machine : Rs. 8,500.00

b) Hand Sewing machine : Rs. 5,500.00

c) Embroidery : Rs. 10,000.00

Total : Rs. 24,000.00

2 FIXTURE & FURNITURE

a) Table, Chair, Bench, etc. : Self Owned

b) Electric Iron : Rs. 700.00

c) Measuring tape, Scissor : Rs. 300.00

Total : Rs. 1,000.00

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE + FIXTURE & FURNITURE

= TOTAL EXPECTED EXPENDITURE : Rs. 25,000.00

EXPECTED PROJECT INCOME

Daily Income @ Rs.150.00/Finished clothes : Rs. 450.00

Monthly Income : Rs. 11,250.00

Total Income for 1 year : Rs. 135,000.00

EXPECTED PROFIT (Within 1 Year)

NET INCOME TOTAL EXPENSES = PROFIT

Rs. 135,000.00 ‐ Rs. 25,000.00 = 110,000.00



Chapter 8: Project Phasing and YearWise Action Plan

The project will be implemented in a phased manner and will be completed in four to seven

years depending on the need. All institutional structures viz. Watershed Development Teams

(WDTs), Watershed Committees (WCs) User Groups (UGs) etc. will be established in first year itself

and staff will be recruited and trained. Entry Point Activities (EPA) will be completed within the

first year and watershed works will also be taken up from the first year onwards. Skill up gradation

trainings and capacity building of Watershed Development Teams (WDTs), Watershed Committees

(WCs) Self Help Groups, Individuals and User Groups will continue over the project period and

placement facilities services will be completed within the project period. Coverage of families is

phased over a period of four years. Consolidation of project components and interventions will

begin during the sixth and seventh year. Table No. 54 and Table No. 55 below depicts the phasing

strategy and year wise action plan for Community Institution building and project interventions.

The classification of activities in yearly/annual phases must not be understood in a rigid

manner. Many of the later activities may even start during the first year or third year itself.

Phasing of activities has an internal logic and integrity that flow through the entire action plan

which depended on a host of factors such as the prevailing initial conditions, needs and

possibilities in each village, response of the community etc. Flexibility is built into the action

plan reflect the distinguishing feature of the Common Guidelines. Project phasing strategy and

Year-wise Action Plan is tabulated as below:



TABLE NO. 50: PROJECT PHASING STRATEGY

(Financial Figures are in Rupees Lakhs)

Sl. No

Component

1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year 7th Year Total

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Entry Point Activities (4%) 16 30.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 30.00

2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%)

‐ 12.00 ‐ 10.00 ‐ 8.00 ‐ 7.50 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 37.50

3

Productivity Enhancement (13%)

10 25.00 10 25.00 10 25.00 9 22.50 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 39 97.50

4 Livelihoods for Asset less (10%)

‐ ‐ 15 10.50 20 23.00 20 23.00 9 13.50 2 5.00 ‐ ‐ 66 75.00

5

Natural Resource Management (50%)

1818 48.805 1871 100.752 1872 101.172 1837 76.386 1778 47.885 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9176 375.00

6 Consolidation phase (5%) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15.00 ‐ 15.00 ‐ 7.50 37.50

7 Administration (10%) ‐ 12..50 ‐ 12.50 ‐ 12.50 ‐ 11.00 ‐ 10.00 ‐ 9.00 ‐ 7.50 75.00

TOTAL 1844 128.305 1896 158.752 1902 169.672 1866 140.386 1787 86.385 2 29.00 15.00 9297 727.50



TABLE NO. 51: YEAR WISE ACTION PLAN

A). COMPONENT: ENTRY POINT ACTIVITIES

Sl. No

Sub‐Component


Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs Lakh)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Water Harvest Tank 3 9 3 9

2 Urinal Shed 6 1.50 6 1.50

3 Waiting Shed 3 4.50 3 4.50

4 Agri Link Road 4km 15.0 4km 15.0

TOTAL 16 30.00 16 30.00

B). COMPONENT: INSTITUTION AND CAPACITY BUILDING

Sl. No

Sub‐Component


Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs Lakh)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Institution and Capacity Building

12.00 10.00 8.00 7.50 37.50

TOTAL 12.00 10.00 8.00 7.50 37.50



C). COMPONENT: PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT/FARM PRODUCTION SYSTEM

(All financial figures are in Rs lakhs)

Sl. No

Sub‐Component


Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No) Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Rubber Cultivation

5 12.50 3 7.50 3 7.50 1 2.50 12 30.00

2 Passion Fruit Cultivation

1 2.50 2 5.00 5 12.50 8 20.00

3 Arecanut Cultivation

5 12.50 3 7.50 2 5.00 10 25.00

4 Bamboo Cultivation

2 5.00 3 7.50 2 5.00 7 17.50

5 Greenhouse Farming

1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

TOTAL 10 25.00 10 25.00 10 25.00 9 22.50 39 97.50



D). COMPONENT: LIVELIHOOD FOR ASSETLESS/LIVELIHOOD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

(All financial figures are in Rs lakhs)

Sl. No

Sub‐Component


Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Dairy Farming 1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

2 Poultry Farming (Layer) 1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

3 Poultry Farming (Broiler) 1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

4 Hill Cattle Rearing 1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

5 Goat Rearing 2 5.00 2 5.00 2 5.00 6 15.00

6 Pigrearing 2 5.00 2 5.00 2 5.00 6 15.00

7 Aquaculture 1 2.50 1 2.50 1 2.50 1 2.50 4 10.00

8 Vermicomposting 1 2.50 1 2.50 2 5.00

9 Electronic Goods Servicing 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 10 2.50

10 Carpentry 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 10 2.50

11 Petty Trade 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 10 2.50

12 Tailoring 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 10 2.50

TOTAL 15 10.50 20 23.00 20 23.00 9 13.50 2 5.00 66 75.00



E). COMPONENT: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

Sl. No

Sub‐Component


Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs Lakh)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs) Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

Phy (No)

Fin (Rs)

1 Stone Bund 600 13.13 600 13.13 600 13.13 600 13.13 600 13.13 3000 65.6382

2 Staggered Contour Trench

1118 24.505 1118 24.505 1118 24.505 1118 24.505 1118 24.505 5590 122.52156

3 Bordered Contour Trench

60 10.25 60 10.25 60 10.25 60 10.25 60 10.25 300 51.2505

4 Afforestation 40 14.297 40 14.297 20 7.15 100 35.74219

5 Check Dam Type A 2 13.61 2 13.61326

6 Check Dam Type B 2 10.26 3 15.39 5 25.65

7 Check Dam Type C 2 7.54 3 11.31 1 3.77 6 22.62

8 Earthen Bund 40 0.92 40 0.92 40 0.92 30 0.691 150 3.4458

9 Agri Link Road 4 15.0 4 15.0 8 30.00

10 Farm Pond 5 1.5 5 1.5 5 1.5 15 4.51855

TOTAL 1818 48.805 1871 100.752 1872 101.172 1837 76.386 1778 47.885 9176 375.00



Chapter 9: Consolidation and Withdrawal Mechanism

In this phase the resources augmented and economic plans developed in the earlier

phases will be made the foundation to create new nature‐based, sustainable livelihoods and

raise productivity levels. The main objectives under this phase will be to consolidate and

complete various works, building the capacity of the community based organizations to carry

out the new agenda items during post project period, sustainable management of (developed)

natural resources and up‐scaling of successful experiences regarding farm production systems /

off‐farm livelihoods. List of various activities to be performed during Consolidation period are

given below:

A) Consolidation of various works:

a). Preparation of project completion report with details about status of each

Intervention;

b). Documentation of successful experiences and lessons learnt for future use.

B) Management of developed natural resources

a). Improving the sustainability of various interventions under the project;

b). Formal allocation of users right over Common Property Resources (CPRs);

c). Collection of user charges for CPRs;

d). Repair, maintenance and protection of CPRs;

e). Sustainable utilization of developed natural resources;

f). Involvement of Village Councils/corresponding institutions (as a governance

body) in addressing the above aspects.

C) Intensification of farm production systems/off‐farm livelihoods

a). Up scaling of successful experiences related to above aspects through

revolving fund under the project as well as credit and technical support from

external institutions;

b). Promotion of agro‐processing, marketing arrangements of produce and

similar off – farm and informal sector enterprises.

c). Farmers may also be encouraged to develop non pesticidal management,

low cost organic inputs, seed farms and links with wider markets to fetch

competitive price.

D) Project management related aspects

a). Participatory planning, implementation and monitoring of activities to be

carried out during consolidation phase;

b). Terminal evaluation of project as per the expected outcomes.



Self Help Group Federation (SHGF):

Self Help Group Federations (SHGF) will be formed in each village to support economic

activities at scale. These would further strengthen and activate the linkages established with

external resource agencies for knowledge, credit, input procurement, sale of local produce,

carrying on processing activities to the point of exports. In these activities, bankability of

activities will be attempted. The executive committee will have 10‐15 members with sufficient

women participation. The ex‐officio secretary of the executive committee will be will be

nominated by the Block Development Officer. In the non‐economic sphere activities will raising

various social issues of non inclusion of the poor, gender participation, establishing norms for

social accountability, and conflict resolution within and across SHGs.

Viable business activities will be identified and linked with a wider market to provide the

poor with sustainable opportunities for increasing their household incomes. The project will

also facilitate SHGs to federate into higher‐level organizations (namely producer

companies/cooperatives etc.) to access higher level services by leveraging on economies of

scale. A federation will start with mature SHGs and in a size that is economically viable. An

established federation would later invite other SHG members from the area to join as the

groups’ capacities and interests grow. Such livelihoods federations will legally take the form of

either Producer Companies or Cooperative Societies where the individual SHGs engaged in

specific livelihoods will become shareholders or cooperative members under the livelihood

federation. The project will provide an initial grant in the form of working capital to each

federation upon approval of its business plan. The federation will subsequently leverage the

grant money to raise additional funding from commercial banks on commercial terms.

Linkages:

These organizations may seek services of technical resource organizations/persons

for business interventions. The project will develop package of practices that is first demonstrated

in a local agro‐ecological zone and help for tie ups with private sector especially for marketing; for

example, with food retail chains.



EXIT PROTOCOL:

Since the beginning of this project the community members are being facilitated to adopt

operational strategies in capacity building. In the last year of the project, the Watershed

Committee/Watershed Association will be converted in to a self‐sufficient, independent

institution which will be able to maintain post project activities on its own. The convergence and

harmonization of resources of different flagship scheme and programmes will be channelled

through this project. At the end of the project (after saturation) the concerned PIA / Block

Development Officer shall hand over the assets created during the project period,

responsibilities and post project management etc. to the Watershed Committee/Association

through a memorandum of agreement depicted below:‐

The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Watershed Committee (WC)

& Block Development Officer (PIA)

This Memorandum of Agreement is executed on this___________ day of _________ month

____________year & between Watershed Committee,_________________________________ Village,

represented by its President herein after called and referred to as the Committee and the PIA .

IN FAVOUR OF

PIA under Lunglei III IWMP Lunglei district, handing over the post management responsibilities

& sustainability to the President & the authorized person, on behalf of WC to undertake the

responsibilities of ongoing development within the project area as per terms and conditions.

Now this document witnesses as follows:

The terms and conditions in respect of Memorandum of Agreement between Watershed Association and PIA

1. An exhaustive list of assets (structures, amount in cash and in the bank accounts) created

(under EPA, NRM, FPS & LSS) in all the matured and saturated watersheds under IWMP

should be prepared by the respective Watershed Committees and handed over to the PIA

through WDT, retaining one copy of the same with them for post project maintenance

and regular audit at the watershed level by the Chartered Account.

2. The amount lying as on closing date of the project, Watershed Project account should be

audited and transferred to the Watershed Development Fund (WDF) Account in the Bank.



3. For sustainability of the programme beyond the project period, the Watershed (WC)

should believe in rotational leadership and is authorized to operate only one Bank

Account i.e. WDF Account.

4. Yearly auditing of the accounts by Competent Authority is mandatory and to be adhered

strictly.

5. The office bearers of Watershed Committee (WC) shall not involve in any political or

religious activities.

6. The office bearers of Watershed Association and Watershed Committee shall involve all

the communities irrespective of caste, creed and religious.

7. In case of any embezzlement of fund, the Administrative system shall proceed according

to existing Rules & Laws.

8. The appropriate officials shall have the liberty to inspect and carry out checks on works

under progress, completed works, documents, reports, vouchers, accounts, Cash Book,

physical verification of assets created under IWMP at any time and can take any

administrative action against the defaulter/s.

9. The community assets shall be divided into three categories : (a) Those which are to be

used by the same families on a regular basis (e.g. water tanks, field drains etc.) ; (b) Those

which annually auctioned (e.g. fishing right, biomass from the common land etc.) and (c)

Common assets like irrigation sources, WHS, canals, watershed office, tanks/ponds etc.

10. Separate list of beneficiaries shall be prepared for assets under category (a), (b) and (c)

as applicable.

11. The Watershed Association shall have the right to decide the service charges to be

collected from the beneficiaries associated with the first category (a) of structures and

also collect the amount through; auction regarding use of assets under second (b)

category of structures and shall be deposited under the Watershed Development Fund

account.

12. The WDF account will primarily run in the nature of revolving Fund. No individual

beneficiary should be granted any sorts of grant, financial assistance in any form.

13. Only the SHG/UG formed during the implementation phase shall have the eligibility to

take loans. For sustainability of the programme beyond the project period, all groups i.e.

Self Help Groups and User Groups should be converted into income generating groups

and should have rotational leadership.

14. New groups (SHG/UG) may be formed during post‐project phase. These groups may also

be entitled to have such loan subject to the fulfilment of maturity criterion.



15. The Watershed Committee (WC) may engage one Para‐worker on regular or part basis

depending upon the need and financial resources available (for maintenance of accounts,

records, registers etc.)

16. The existing rate of interest shall be continued uniformly for all the lending groups and

repayment of loans should be made within one year with maximum 12 (twelve)

instalments.

17. The WC may collect the financial assistance from any other sources to augment the WDF

fund. All donations, interests, fines, fees etc. shall be deposited in the WDF account.

18. All the group representatives (at lease one from each group) shall be ensured in the

Watershed Committee.

19. The decisions approved and resolved in the General Body Meeting of Watershed

Association, will only be executed / implemented by the Watershed Committee.

20. Any change in Watershed Committee shall be made once it is resolved in the Annual

General Meeting (AGM) of Watershed Association.

21. Bi‐monthly Meeting of Watershed Association is mandatory.

22. The WDF shall have interest bearing account in any Nationalized Bank /Corporative

Bank.

23. The WDF shall be jointly operated by the President and the Secretary and/or

unauthorized person duly resolved in WA. During the post project period, the Block

Development Officer i.e. the WDT Leader, will also be a part of Bank Account of WA, to

assure the proper utilization of WDF and no depletion of WDF may take place.

24. Any withdrawal of money from WDF account shall be resolved in WC meeting with

proper records and purpose.

25. The SHG shall take loan maximum up to double the amount of their common fund and the

UG shall be restricted to the equal amount of their savings as usual. However, maximum

amount to be given to one SHG/UG at a time shall not exceed Rs.25000/‐ (Rupees twenty‐

five thousand) only.

26. The peer group pressure shall be kept functional for successful recovery of loan.

27. 50% of interest earned by way of lending shall be retained by the respective groups

(SHGs / UGs) and rest 50% will go to WDF.

28. The Watershed association are also at their liberty to start new profit making ventures by

utilizing the corpus fund (WDF) as security deposit and the profit earned should go to the

WDF.



29. The details of account of income and expenditure shall be presented in the meeting of

Watershed Association and put it on the notice board of WA and Panchayat also on half

yearly basis.

30. In the event that WA becomes defunct, the community assets and WDF fund will be

transferred to the Village Council/ Government.

In witness thereby, the Memorandum of Agreement is executed on the__________

day____________ month And _____________year.

Handing over Taking over

Project Implementing Agency 1) ____________________________ President

2) ______________________________Authorized

Person of Watershed Association

DEPONENTS

Witnessed by,

1) _____________________________________________

2) _____________________________________________



Chapter 10: Expected Outcomes

8.1 Expected Outcomes 8.1.1 Drinking water

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of

drinking water would improve as given in the table below.

Table No. 50: Status of drinking water


Availability of drinking water (No. of month in a year)

Quality of drinking water

Pre Project Expected post

project Pre Project

Expected post project

1 Phairuangkai Through every village has access to drinking water, existing sources of water are inadequate due to increasing population

Unexplored natural sources of water will be tapped and greater thrust on rain water harvesting will improved the condition significant

Satisfactory. However, external pollutants tend to make the water turbid especially during the monsoons

Condition will improve with required intervention through the programme

2 Rotlang ‘W’

3 Runtung

8.1.2. Migration

On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment

for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal

migration from the area.

Table No.51: Migration from the Project Area


No.of persons migrating

No. of days per year of migrating

Major reasons for migrating

Expected reduction in No. of persons migrating

1 Phairuangkai 64 Data not available

In search of better livelihood

13 2 Rotlang ‘W’ 28 6 3 Runtung 11 2



8.1.3 Crops

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking. All this can change

with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned

earthen bunds would help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve moisture in the

soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too.

The farmers can then take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be

taken.

Table No. 52: Major crops grown and their productivity in the Project Areas

Sl.No Name of Crop Current Status Expected post Project status

Area (Ha) Productivity (Kg/Ha) Area (Ha) Productivity

(Kg/Ha) 1 Rice 20 1000 90 1500

2 Mize 10 1000 70 1200

3 Sugarcane 10 1000 50 1200

4 Oil Seed 5 1000 30 1000 8.1.4 Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524ha which

consists of only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda babool). Trees like Neem and _Alianthus_are seen just

here and there, not concentrated in any area.

It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation.

8.1.5 Livestock

The interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes and other such

related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post

project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.

8.1.6Linkages

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such

support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. These linkages would

involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.



8.1.7 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the Project Area. The principal occupations of

the people are shifting cultivation, animal husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall

being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop,

which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry

very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people

mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it. The project plans for

creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment

would be created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen

bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment would be created by providing

the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal

husbandry and enterprise development.



Table No. 53: Employment Generation


Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiary

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Woman Total

1 Phairuangkai 223698 17208 240905 260 20 280 15 10 25

2 Rotlang ‘W’ 98943 8604 107547 115 10 125 15 5 10

3 Runtung 30113 4302 34415 35 5 40 5 5 10

8.1.8 Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over

the years. Presently it stands at 28 m. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table

depth from 28 m in the pre‐project level to 25 m in the post project period.



Table No. 54: Ground Water Table depth in the Project Area.

Sl.No Name of Village Source PreProject level Expected Post project level

1 2 3 4 5

1 Phairuangkai

Surface Water, Rain Water Harvesting

Depletion during the dry season and also due to extensive exploitation of ground water

Ground water will be recharged through a forestation and recharge pits to increase soil moisture and to maintain the water

table level

2 Rotlang ‘W’

3 Runtung



CHAPTER 11: LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS

Logical Framework Analysis:

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact 1 2 3 4 5

Village Institution Formation

• Formation of Watershed Committees • Formation of Self Help Groups • Formation of User Groups

• One Watershed Committee for each village

• Number of Self Help Groups and User Groups depending on the coverage of particular intervention

• Project can be implemented in a democratic and participatory manner ensuring equity

• Unity and prosperity in the village management.

• People participation • Positive perception of the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

• Organise training and awareness programmes for village institutions

• Capacity building workshops and exposure visits of Watershed Committees, SHGs and User Groups

• Facilitating and monitoring the functioning of WCs, SHGs and UGs

• Strengthen linkages between WCs, SHGs and UGs

• Gender sensitization of WCs , UGs and SHGs to increase inclusiveness of decision making

• Sensitize village communities to involve youth in development

• Awareness Camps to be organised

• Training and exposure visits of WCs, SHGs and UGs to be held

• Capacity building workshops to be organised

• Federation of SHGs and UGs to be formed

• Quality of management of resources to be improved

• Quality of distribution of benefits between people to be improved

• Increased awareness of women about village resources

• Women Participation enhanced

• Participation of youth in development increased

Fund Management • Improve management and utilization

of funds by UGs, SHGs and WCs • Prepare communities to explore other sources of income

• operating Bank Accounts and managing funds on their own

• Federation of SHGs and UGs creating credit linkages with banks

• Purpose frequency and volume and use of the fund enhanced

• Volume of funds generated for UGs and WCs from other sources

Increased



Ecological Restoration

• Protection treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

• Protection treatment and regeneration of forest lands

• Plantation of fruits and forest species

• Identification of non‐timber forest produce based income generation activities

• Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro‐horti forestry

• Forest lands to be brought under new plantation and protection

• Income generation intervention promoted

• Accessibility to common and forest land increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts

• Fodder availability from common and private lands increased

• Better ecological balance

• Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder

Rainfed Area Development

• Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices

• Promotion of good agricultural practices

• Promotion of organic farming practices

• Identification of agri‐produce based income generating practices like processing

• Promotion of better irrigation practices like drip irrigation

• Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

• Good agricultural practices to be promoted

• Organic farming to be promoted

• Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities too be promoted

• Water harvesting structures to be constructed

• Training, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

• Improved productivity of treated land

• Increased availability of water in wells

• Farmers adopt organic farming practices

• Increase availability of water for 9 to 12 months

• Increased availability of water for livestock

• Availability of irrigation water established

• Farmers take two crops in a year

• Increase in proportion of households having more security of food

• Increase in contribution of agricultural income to the household income



Women’s Sociopolitical and economic empowerment

• Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG groups

• Capacity building of womenfolk • Capacity building of SHG leaders and accountants

• Linking SHGs with external financial institutions

• Women’s SHG groups to be formed

• Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed

• Trainings to be conducted for preparation of woollen products from sheep and goats

• Enhanced capacities of leaders of women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

• Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

• Increased household income

• Position of women in household, community, society (politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

• Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision‐making, leadership and fund management.

• Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’s education, health)



CHAPTER 12: MONITORING AND EVALUATION

As enshrined in the project core values and based on the non‐negotiable principles of

the project , monitoring and evaluation of the project will adhere to the principles of transparency,

participation, and accountability. The degree of success of a project depends on monitoring to a

great extent. Therefore, a comprehensive monitoring system will be designed for the project.

Monitoring Committees will be created at each level of administration namely Village, Block and

District and their working modalities spelt out.

There will be a Village Monitoring Committee at each village to monitor the working of

SHGs and other stakeholders. The Monitoring committee members will be elected by the Gram

Sabha and will be chaired by a person who is not the member of SHG. This Committee will verify

the working of every Self Help Group every three months and submit their report to the PIA.

Apart from this, social audit will be conducted every six months to review the working of

Self Help Groups. The Gram Sabha will form Social audit forum who will conduct all the social

audit processes. The success of the Forum depends upon the open and fearless participation of

all people, particularly potential beneficiaries of the project. Effective public participation

requires adequate publicity about the Forum as well as informed public opinion. It will require

that people have prior access to information from the Chairman of the Watershed Committee

The date, time, agenda, importance and sanctity of the Forum will be widely publicized so as to

ensure maximum participation. All the relevant documents, including complete files of the

works or copies of them will be made available for inspection. The checklist below will help in

reviewing whether the norms and provisions of the project are being observed.

a) Whether the process of formation of SHG was conducted in a transparent manner:

b) Whether there is a manipulation of already sanctioned development works

c) Whether there is a diversion or under‐execution of development works

d) Whether there is problem in credit flows

e) Whether SHGs really took up the work for which they received

f) Whether the work done are commensurate with the sanctioned amount.

All the proposals and query raised in the Social audit will be submitted to the for further

necessary action.

Similarly, monitoring committees will be formed at the Block and District levels.



Evaluation:

The objective of IWMP is to improve capacity and opportunities for the rural poor to

achieve sustainable livelihoods). Investments made are expected to generate employment and

purchasing power, raise economic productivity, promote women’s participation in the

workforce, strengthen the rural infrastructure through the creation of durable assets and

contribute to the regeneration of natural resources. Thus, outlays for the project have to be

transformed into outcomes. Regular evaluations and sample surveys of specific works should be

conducted to assess outcomes. District‐wise studies should be conducted or commissioned by

the State level agency.. Project‐wise evaluation studies should be conducted or commissioned by

the District Project Manager.

The District Unit should develop its own evaluation system in collaboration with

research institutions of repute and review evaluations conducted by other agencies. The

evaluation studies should also throw light on particular innovations in planning, monitoring or

implementation.

Management Information System:

The State/District Unit will adopt Creation of a Management Information System

(MIS) with a database on all the activities taken up under the project, resource requirements,

registered SHGs, funds received and expended at different levels, and all other related matters.

The full possible applications of IT to the implementation of the project will be explored and

appropriate modules developed into a comprehensive system to be continuously up‐graded as

required. IT experts will be engaged to deal with this MIS and through this all the information

pertaining to the implementation of the project will be given to higher authorities every month

on‐line.

The introduction of MIS will facilitate –

(a) The efficiency and transparency of operational processes

(b) Digitization of Registration and other important documents;

(c) Financial Management Systems: The fund transfer from the Ministry, States, Districts

and PIA may be entered on‐line.

(d) Communication and access to information;

(e) Grievance‐redressal systems; etc.



Chapter 13: Mapping











































































AnnexureI







Annexure II





Annexure III





Annexure IV





Annexure V

MODEL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF A SOCIETY 1. Name of the Society

Name of the Society shall be ...................................................................................

2. Membership The membership of the Society is open to any person who has attained the age of

maturity and fulfills the terms and conditions of the Society but subject to the approval of the Governing Body. If any Government servant is desirous of becoming a member of the Society, he/she will have to inform the appropriate authority in the Government prior to joining the society. If the membership is not approved by the Governing Body, the reason of refusal shall be communicate to the person/applicant concerned.

3. Admission Fee & Subscription The Admission Fee and the Subscription shall be as under unless otherwise revised by

the Governing Body.

(a) Admission Fee Rs. ______________________ at the time of admission.

(b) Subscription Rs. ______________________________ per month.

4. Termination or Cessation of Membership The Governing Body of the Society shall have the powers to expel/terminate

a member or/and members, from the membership of the society, on the following grounds: (a) On death.

(b) On written resignation.

(c) If found to be involved in any anti‐social activities.

(d) If adjudged by any court of law to be a criminal offender.

(e) If found guilty by means of anti propaganda of the Aims & Objects of the

society

(f) If fails to pay the subscription contribution or contribution for three months.

(g) If has not attended three consecutive meetings.

(h) If disregards Rules & Regulations or disobey the decisions of the Governing

Body. The decision of the Governing Body shall be communicated to the member

concerned.

5. Re‐Admission In case, any member of the Society is expelled by the Governing Body on any ground of section 4(b), (e), (f), (g) & (h) of Rules & Regulations, he can be readmitted, Provided the Governing Body permitted his/her readmission.



6. Registration of members and facilities The society shall maintain a register of its members and shall entre therein the name, address, date of enrolment and date of termination of a members.

7. General Body Defined All members of the society will constitute the General Body of the society.

8. General Body a. Notice:‐ Minimum__________ days notice shall be given to the members, before in the

date of General Body Meeting, enclosing agenda specifying date, time, place and issue to be discussed.

b. Meeting:‐ General Body Meeting shall be held at least once in every year. c. Quorum:‐ The quorum of General Body Meeting shall be 2/3rd (two‐third) of the total

strength of the General Body members of the society. 9. Rights & Privileges of Members

All and every member of the society. a. Shall be entitled to participate in meetings cultural/educational functions and other

lawful gatherings, call/arranged by the society. b. Have right to collect the Identity Card after depositing the required/prescribed fee

(fixed by the Governing Body of the Society from time to time) 10. Duties of the Members

All and every member of the society shall: a. Elect the Governing Body of the society, b. Attend the General Body meetings regularly c. Give the Necessary information to the society, pertaining to any matter which is

necessary to be known by the society. d. Not indulge in activities which are prejudial to the Aims and Objects and/or the Rule &

Regulations of the Society. 11. Governing Body:

a. Strength:‐ The Strength of Governing Body (Including office bearers and executive member) shall not be less than ___________ and not more than _________________

b. Term:‐ Term of every Governing Body shall be ___________years. c. Notice:‐ Minimum ____________days notice but urgent Governing Body

Meeting can be called by 24 hours notice. d. Quorum:‐ Quorum of every Governing Body Meeting shall be ________________

of the total strength of the Governing Body. e. Meeting:‐ Governing Body Meeting shall ordinarily be held once in 3 months

regularly but shall be held at least once every year. f. Emergent Meeting:‐ The Emergent Governing Body Meeting may be called by the 24

hours notice but quorum for the same Emergent Governing Body Meeting shall be 2/3rd of the total strength of the Governing Body of the Society.

12. Composition of the Governing Body:‐ The Composition of the Governing Body shall be as under:

a. President / Chairman One

b. Vice President/ Chairman One



c. General Secretary One

d. Assistant Secretary One

e. Treasurer One

f. Financial Secretary One

g. Executive Members From ……………………. to ………………………

13. Termination of Members of Governing Body:‐ Any member of the Governing Body can be terminated from the office on the same grounds of article 4.

14. Functions and Powers of Governing Body:‐ a. Governing Body shall be responsible for the management and administration of all

affairs of the society, and is also authorized to appoint any office bearer, executive

member to look after any particular activity.

b. All the decisions shall be taken by the majority votes.

c. The Governing Body shall have the powers as are the powers of the Society,

mentioned in the memorandum of the society and in these rules and regulations.

The Governing Body shall have also the following powers:

(i) To prepare plans, Projects and Programmes.

(ii) To appoint election officers and his / her powers.

15. Restriction on Holding office:‐ No persons who is an undercharged insolvent or who has been convicted of any offence under the law shall be entitled to be a member of a Governing Body. Permission/sanction from the prescribed authority shall be obtained by the Government Servant holding an elective office in the society.

16. Powers and Duties of office Bearers: A. President/Chairman

a. President/Chairman shall preside over all the meetings of the society.

b. At the time of voting on any matter/ subject (except election), if the total votes of the

groups of members happen to be equal in number the President has the power to cast

an extra vote to decide the matter / subject

c. President/Chairman shall have the power to allow inclusion of any subject/ matter in

agenda for the discussion in the course of proceeding/ meeting.

d. President/Chairman will sign all the papers/letters, on behalf of the society, to

conduct its correspondence.

B. Vice President/Vice Chairman The Vice President/ Vice Chairman of the society shall enjoy all the powers of the President/Chairman in his/her absence.



C. General Secretary. a. General Secretary will summon and attend the meeting of the Governing Body and

General Body b. General Secretary will prepare the membership register as well as the proceeding

register to record the minutes of the proceedings of the Governing Body Meeting and have them duly signed by the members who attend the meetings.

D. Secretary The Secretary shall enjoy all the powers of General Secretary in his/ her absence.

E. Treasurer a. All funds of the society shall remain under the care and management of Treasurer. b. Treasurer shall maintain the accounts of all money which is received and/or paid by

him/her on behalf of the society. c. Treasurer shall make disbursement in accordance with the direction of Governing

Body. F. Financial Secretary.

a. He shall keep account book of the Society’s fund and shall record all receipts and

expenditure.

b. All monetary transactions shall be made through her/ him

c. He/she shall be responsible with the Treasurer for the proper accounting of the

Society’s fund.

17. Filling up of Casual Vacancies Any casual vacancy amongst the Governing Body, shall be filled by the resolution passed by the Governing Body. Such appointment(s) shall be confirmed by the General Body in its coming General Body Meeting.

18. Appeals All the appeals shall be preferred to the Governing Body of the society and the decision of the Governing Body shall be final.

19. Election General Body in its Annual Meeting will elect its President/Chairman and all the office bearers

and also the Executive Members of the Governing Body, after every __________________

years by secret ballot papers or by show of hands as the Election Officer may decide, voting

by proxy will be allowed/will not be allowed. Simple majority of vote shall be declared as

elected accepted.

20. Sources of Income All the income of the society shall be utilized only for the promotion and uplift me of the Aims and Objects of the society. Sources of income of the society are as under:

a. Admission fee : Subscription from the members of the society. b. Donations and special contributions.



21. Property of a Society All property belonging to a society shall vest in the Governing Body of the Society but

shall be referred to as the property of the society. The society shall maintain register for recording details of the properties.

22. Gift Any kind of gift received from any person for a specific purpose shall not be used for

any other purpose without the consent of the donors of Registrar, Firms & Society.

23. Financial Year Financial Year of Society shall start from 1st April to 31st March, every year.

24. Audit The accounts of society shall be audited by the qualified auditor (Chartered Accountant or Persons approved by the Registrar, Firms & Societies) every year.

25. Management of Funds & Accounts Operation Bank Accounts shall be operated by joint signatures of ___________________________ the society shall keep proper books of accounts in which all sums of money received, source thereof, expenditure and object or purpose, the assets and liabilities of the society shall be entered.

26. Inspection of accounts and of the proceedings of meetings All the members of the society shall have the right to inspect Books of accounts and proceedings of the meetings of the society if and when required.

27. Submission of annual reports/returns One in every year a list of the Governing Body of the current year, annual activities report certified by the President and Secretary and auditor’s report and balance sheet for the previous year duly audited and signed by the qualified auditors shall be in office of the Registrar, Firms & Societies, Mizoram, Aizawl as it is required under section 18 of the Mizoram Societies Registration Act. 2005.

28. Dissolution If the society needs to be dissolved, it shall be dissolved as per provisions laid down under the Section 25 & 28 of the Mizoram Societies Registration Act. 2005.

29. Legal Proceedings Society may sue and/or be used in the name of the President, the Society or any office bearer authorized by the Governing Body in this behalf.



30. Amendment Any amendment in memorandum and Rules & Regulations will be carried out in

accordance with Section 9 of the Mizoram Societies Registration Act. 2005.

31. Application of the Act. All the provisions under all the section of the Mizoram Societies Registration Act.

2005 shall be applicable to this society. Certified that this is the correct copy of the Rules & Regulations of the society.

Secretary Chairman

…………………………………………..... Watershed Committee ................................... Lui



Documents

DETAILED PROJECT REPORTmizorural.nic.in/file/IWMP/ACTION PLAN/Action Plan... · INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME (IWMP) DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF LUNGLEI – III (LOWER