75

Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

design of complex bridge deck

Citation preview

Page 1: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 2: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DESIGN OF DECKFOR COMPLEX CONCRETE BRIDGE

Page 3: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

GROUP NO. 04 (A)

Junaid Amin11-CE-79

Mujtaba Ahmed11-CE-54

Muhammad Asif11-CE-39

Page 4: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

BRIDGES

Bridges are define as structures, which provide a connection or passage over a gap without blocking the opening or passageway beneath.

Page 5: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Elements of bridge•superstructure•substructure

Super Structure•Wearing surface •Deck •Primary members •Secondary members

Substructure•Abutments•Bearings•Pedestals•Back Wall•Wing Wall•Footings•Piles•Sheeting

Page 6: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 7: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

SUPER STRUCTURE THE PORTION OF THE BRIDGE THAT SUPPORTS THE DECK AND CONNECTS ONE SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT TO ANOTHER.

Page 8: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

WEARING SURFACEIt is that portion of deck which

resists traffic wear. In some instances it is a separate bitumen layer, while in some cases it is integral part of concrete deck. The integral wearing surface is typically ½ to 2 in (13 to 51mm).the bituminous wearing course usually varies in thickness from 2 to 4 in (51 to 102mm).

Page 9: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DECK It is the physical extension of the

roadway across the obstruction to be bridged.

Functions:- To distribute loads transversely along the

bridge cross-section To distribute loads longitudinally along the

length of the bridge.

Page 10: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

PRIMARY MEMBERS

It distributes loads longitudinally and is usually designed principally to resist flexure and shear.SECONDARY MEMBERS

Secondary members are bracing between primary members designed to resist cross-sectional deformation of superstructure frame and help distribute part of the vertical load between stringers.

Page 11: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STRINGERS

o Stringers are primary longitudinal support members, usually rectangular pieces that are 5 or more inches thick. With a depth more than 2 inches greater than the thickness.

Page 12: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

SUB STRUCTURE PORTION OF THE BRIDGE THAT SUPPORTS THE SUPERSTRUCTURE AND DISTRIBUTES ALL BRIDGE LOADS TO BELOW-GROUND BRIDGE FOOTINGS.

Page 13: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

ABUTMENTS

They are earth retaining structures which supports the superstructure and overpass roadway at the beginning and end of a bridge.

BEARINGS These are mechanical systems which

transmit the vertical and horizontal loads of superstructure to substructure and accommodate movement between superstructure and substructure.

Page 14: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

PEDESTAL

A pedestal is a short column on an abutment or pier under a bearing which directly supports a superstructure primary member

BACK WALL

It is also called stem, is the primary component of the abutment acting as a retaining structure at each approach.

Page 15: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

WINGS WALL

A wing wall is a side wall to the abutment back wall or stem designed to assist in confining earth behind the abutment

FOOTINGS As bearing transfer the superstructure loads to

the substructure, so in turn do the abutment and pier footing transfer loads from the substructure to the subsoil or piles. A footing supported by soil without piles are called a spread footing .a footing supported by piles is known as a pile cap

Page 16: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 17: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 18: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 19: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Types Of Decks

In-situ Reinforce

d Concrete

Decks

Precast Concrete Decks

Open Steel Grid

Decks

Timber Decks

Page 20: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

SIMPLE & COMPLEX CONCRETE BRIDGES

Bridge decks are an integral part of the bridge structure by providing the direct riding surface for motor vehicles. In addition, bridge decks directly transfer load from the moving traffic to the major load-carrying members.

In Simple Concrete Bridges, the span of the bridges is simple and straight. Therefore it uses simple formwork for its casting or construction as shown in fig (A).

Page 21: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Figure (A)

Page 22: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

In Complex concrete bridges, according to International Paper on Complex concrete construction, shapes or geometry of structure is complex. So we need complex arrangement of formwork to get that geometry. For example Reinforced Concrete Box Girder Decks as shown in fig (B).

Page 23: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Figure (B)

Page 24: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

COMPARISON BETWEEN BOX GIRDER AND T-BEAM GIRDER BRIDGES

A box girder is formed when two web plates are joined by a common flange at both the top and the bottom. The closed cell which is formed has a much greater torsional stiffness than an open section

Span range is more for box bridge girder as compare to T-beam Girder Bridge resulting in comparatively lesser number of piers for the same valley width and hence results in economy.

Page 25: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Slab bridge decks are useful for short spans

. Box girders are used for spans from 40m up to 300m using either in-situ or precast concrete segmental construction. Box girders produce elegant solutions.

Page 26: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

In-situ Concrete Box Girder Deck

Page 27: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Precast Concrete Box Girder Decks

Page 28: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Concrete decks are primarily designed

for flexure in the transverse direction; therefore, the spacing of adjacent girders is important. AASHTO Table A4-1 provides a listing of design moments for “S” (girder spacing) values between 4 ft. and 15 ft.

For the typical deck slab, MTD 10-20 (Caltrans 2008b) provides the minimum deck slab thicknesses and reinforcement schedule for various girder types. The typical deck slab thickness varies from 7 in. to 10 3/8 in. depending on the girder type and spacing.

Page 29: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

The minimum concrete cover is determined in accordance with CA 5.12.3. Extreme environments can have a negative effect on the service life of a concrete deck slab. Corrosion of the reinforcing steel should be a major concern when designing a bridge deck in an extreme environment. MTD 10-5 gives details about Corrosion of steel

For design purposes, the minimum compressive concrete strength fc'=3.6 ksi shall be used for reinforced concrete (CA 5.4.2.1).

Page 30: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DESIGN APPROACHES Service Limit State

Concrete decks are designed to meet the requirements for Service I limit state (AASHTO 9.5.2). Service limit state is used to control excessive deformation and cracking.

Strength Limit StateConcrete decks must be designed for Strength I limit state. Because concrete deck slabs are usually designed as tension-controlled reinforced concrete components, the resistance factor is Ǿ=0.9 (AASHTO 5.5.4.2). Strength II limit state typically is not checked for deck designs

Page 31: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Extreme Event Limit StateMost bridge decks include an overhang with a concrete barrier attached. Therefore, the deck overhang has to be designed to meet the requirements for Extreme Event II.

Fatigue Limit StateConcrete decks supported by multi-girder systems are not required to beinvestigated for fatigue (AASHTO 9.5.3).

Page 32: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

ANALYSIS METHODS Approximate Method of Analysis

Caltrans traditionally designs concrete

bridge decks as transverse strips as a flexure member. This method is called the Approximate Method of Analysis (AASHTO 4.6.2.1). The concrete deck is assumed to be transverse slab strips, which is supported by the girders. To simplify the design, it is assumed that the girders are rigid supports.

Page 33: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Empirical Method of Analysis

Empirical Design (AASHTO 9.7.1) is a method of deck slab design based on the concept of internal arching action within concrete slabs. But, until further durability testing of this design method is completed, the empirical design method is not permitted for concrete bridge deck design in California (CA 9.7.2.2).

Page 34: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DESIGN METHODOLOGYFollowing are the steps for the design of deck of concrete box girder

Page 35: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-1 DETERMINATION OF DECK THICKNESS & COVER

Deck Thickness Deck thickness is selected according to

MTD 10-20. The minimum deck thickness varies depending upon the girder typec/c spacing of girders.

Deck Cover Deck cover is determined according to

CA (Caltrans) Table 5.12.3-1. typically top cover is taken as 2 inch whereas bottom cover is taken as 1 inch.

Page 36: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-2COMPUTATION UN-FACTORED MOMENTS For Dead Loads

The dead load moments for the deck slab, barrier and future wearing surface are computed for a one-foot wide section of the bridge deck using any approved structural analysis method. For e.g Moment Distribution Method or Computer aided analysis

For Live LoadsThe un-factored live load moments are determined from AASHTO Appendix A4, Table A4-1. This table can be used for decks supported on at least three or more girders, in which the minimum superstructure width, between centerline to centerline of exterior girders, cannot be less than 14′-0″.

Page 37: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-3CALCULATION OF FACTORED DESIGN MOMENTS

Factored moments for Maximum positive and Maximum Negative factored loads is calculated using following equation of strength I load combinations

Ƞ= load Modifier=1 m= Multiple Presence Factor

IM=Dynamic Load Allowance Load factors for dead slab, wearing surface

loads and live loads respectively

Page 38: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-4POSITIVE FLEXURE DESIGN AND NEGATIVE FLEXURE DESIGN

Maximum Negative Moments and Negative Moments are selected .Then using formulas followings details are calculated

Initially Bar size is assumedRequired Area for reinforcement is

calculatedBar spacing is calculated

Page 39: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-5 CHECK FOR CRACK CONTROL

Concrete cracking is controlled by the spacing of flexure reinforcement. To improve crack control in the concrete deck, the reinforcement has to be well distributed over the area of maximum tension. Therefore, AASHTO requires steel reinforcement spacing to satisfy the following formula-6:

Where

Page 40: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-6 TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE REINFORCEMENT

Minimum reinforcement is needed in the slab to distribute the load across the slab, for shrinkage, and temperature change. For the typical slab design, AASHTO requires distribution reinforcement for the top of the slab and the bottom of the slab.

The top of the slab is for shrinkage and temperature reinforcement near the surface of exposed concrete slab. Following Criteria is Used for this Reinf.

Page 41: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-7 DISTRIBUTION STEEL

Distribution steel is provided at the bottom of slab which also acts as temperature and shrinkage steel. Following criteria is used for design.

S in Meters

Page 42: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

DESIGN EXAMPLE PROBLEM (COMPLEX CONCRETE BRIDGE):- (Design of Concrete Box Girder Type Deck) Given Information: A typical section of a reinforced concrete box

girder bridge is shown in Figure-1Max. Girder Spacing: S = 12 ft.Number of Girders: N = 5Concrete compressive strength: fc' = 3.6 ksi (CA 5.4.2.1)Reinforcement strength: fy = 60 ksiType 732 Concrete Barrier weight: w732 = 0.410 klfFuture wearing surface, wfws = 0.140 kcf (AASHTO Table 3.5.1-1)(Assume 3″ thick asphalt section were, wfws = 0.140 kcf × 0.25ft = 0.035 ksf)Reinforced Concrete unit weight, wrc = 0.150 kcf (AASHTO C3.5.1)

Page 43: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 44: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-1 DETERMINE MINIMUM DECK THICKNESS & COVER According to CA 9.7.1.1 (Caltrans 2008a), the

minimum deck thickness must conform to the deck design standards specified by MTD 10-20 (Caltrans 2008b). The minimum deck thickness varies depending on the girder type and the centerline to centerline spacing. Therefore, for a reinforced concrete box girder bridge,S = 12.00 ft assumes a minimum thickness t = 9 1/8 in.The minimum concrete cover is determined according to CA Table 5.12.3-1. For the top surface of the bridge deck in a non-corrosive atmosphere the minimum cover is specified as:Deck Top Cover: Ctop = 2.0 in.The minimum cover specified for the bottom surface of the deck slab is:Deck Bottom Cover: Cbottom = 1.0 in.

Page 45: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-2A COMPUTE UN-FACTORED DEAD LOAD MOMENTS

The dead load moments for the deck slab, barrier and future wearing surface are computed for a one-foot wide section of the bridge deck using any approved structural analysis method. This can include the continuous beam equations, moment distribution, or an acceptable computer analysis program. Table-1 lists the tabulated un-factored dead load moments for each bay given in tenth points using a finite element analysis.

Page 46: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

TABLE-1

Page 47: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-2B COMPUTE UN-FACTORED LIVE LOAD MOMENTS

The un-factored live load moments are determined from AASHTO Appendix A4, Table A4-1. This table can be used for decks supported on at least three or more girders, in which the minimum superstructure width, between centerline to centerline of exterior girders, cannot be less than 14′-0″. The moments are calculated using the equivalent strip method (AASHTO 4.6.2.1.3) for concrete slabs supported on parallel girders. The values given in the table include multiple presence factors and the dynamic load allowance. To be conservative use the largest span length between girders to find the maximum live load force effect.

Page 48: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 49: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-3 CALCULATE THE FACTORED DESIGN MOMENTS

Concrete decks are designed for strength, service and extreme limit states according to AASHTO 9.5. Fatigue and fracture limit states need not be investigated for concrete decks supported by multiple girders (AASHTO 5.5.3 Fatigue Limit State). Therefore,

Strength I Load Combination

Page 50: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

PARAMETERS OF THE FORMULAS

Where, Ƞ= 1 For the slab and barrier (DC): =1.25 (Maximum

Factor) For future wearing surface (DW): =1.50

(Maximum Factor) Multiple Presence Factor =m=1.20 for one lane

of vehicular live load. This value is included in the tabulated moments provided in Table A4-1. Dynamic Load Allowance (M) is also included in Table A4-1 tabulated moments.

=1.75 , For Strength Limits State I

Page 51: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-3A MAXIMUM POSITIVE FACTORED MOMENTS

Based on Table-1, the maximum un-factored positive moment due to the slab, barrier, and future wearing surface is located in Bay 2 or 3 at a distance of 0.5S. The maximum positive moment equals 8.01 kip-ft./ft, as shown in Section 10.6.5. Therefore, the maximum positive factored moment is

Mu=1.0[(1.25)(0.70+0.13)+(1.5)(0.20)+(1.75)(8.01)] = 15.36 kip-ft./ft.

Page 52: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-3B MAXIMUM NEGATIVE FACTORED MOMENTS

The maximum un-factored negative moment due to the slab, barrier and future wearing surface is located in Bay 1 at a distance of 0 (center of exterior girder). The negative moment can be reduced at the face of the girder. The negative moment can be interpolated between 0.0S and 0.1S. Based on the reduced negative moments at the interior face of the girder, the maximum negative factored moment is

Mu = 1.0[(1.25)(1.29+1.71)+(1.5)(0.17)+(1.75)(9.40)] = 20.46 kip-ft./ft.

Page 53: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-4 POSITIVE FLEXURE DESIGNTo design for the maximum positive moment, first, assume

an initial bar size. From this initial bar size, the required area of steel can be calculated. Then the reinforcement spacing can be determined. For this example the assumed initial reinforcing steel size is #5. For a #5-bar,Bar area = 0.31 in2Bar diameter = 0.625 in.Next, determine the effective depth (de), which is equal to the total slab thickness minus the bottom cover, Cbottom , and minus half the bar diameter. Figure-2 shows the relationship between the effective depth and the slab thickness.

Page 54: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Figure-2 Simple Rectangular Concrete Section with Tension Reinforcement.

Page 55: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

For a rectangular section, assume, where a is the depth of the equivalent stress block, and t is the deck thickness. Solve for the required amount of reinforcement, as follows:

Where, b=12in

Putting Values, we get z = 9.56 in²

As = 0.459 in²

Page 56: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Check

Next Determine the spacing between Bars

Use 8 inch spacing for #5 Bars.

Page 57: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

To verify that tension controls the section design and that the proper resistance factor is used to check the strain in the extreme tension reinforcing steel (AASHTO CA 5.7.2.1). The strain, stress and force diagrams for a rectangular concrete section are shown in Figure-3.

Fig-3 Development of Bending Strain, Stress, and Force Actions in a Section.

Page 58: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge
Page 59: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

The steel yields and the section is tension controlled, therefore, the proper resistance factor was used.

Finally, check maximum spacing for primary reinforcement (AASHTO 5.10.3.2). The spacing of the slab reinforcement shall not exceed 1.5 times the thickness of the

slab or 18.0 in.

In this case the maximum spacing equals 8.0 in., which is less than either case.

Page 60: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-5 NEGATIVE FLEXURE DESIGN

Designing for the maximum negative flexure reinforcement is similar to designing for the maximum positive moment reinforcement. These bars are the primary reinforcing steel over the girders as shown in Figure-4.

Page 61: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Assuming #6 bar size.Bar area =0.44 in²Bar diameter =0.750 in.The effective depth, de , for the negative moment is equal to the total slab thickness minus the top cover, C(top) , and half the bar diameter.

Based on the maximum negative momentz =8.262 in².A s =0.740 in²

Page 62: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Required Bar Spacing is

Use 7 in Spacing for #6 bar size.

Page 63: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-6 CHECK FOR CRACK CONTROL UNDER SERVICE LIMIT STATE

Concrete cracking is controlled by the spacing of flexure reinforcement. To improve crack control in the concrete deck, the reinforcement has to be well distributed over the area of maximum tension. Therefore, AASHTO requires steel reinforcement spacing to satisfy the following formula:

In which

Page 64: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-6A DETERMINE MAXIMUM LOADING UNDER SERVICE LIMIT STATE

Service I load combination

Positve moment due to service loading

Negative moment due to service loading:

Note: Negative Service Loading Controls

Page 65: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-6B DETERMINE MAXIMUM REQUIRED SPACING FOR CRACK CONTROL

Determine the neutral axis location, y, based on the transformed section properties.

So

Page 66: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Where,

Calculate the crack moment of inertia, Icr , for the transformed section.

Page 67: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Next, calculate the tensile stress, fss , in the steel reinforcement at service limit state

Finally, determine βs , and then input that value into the formula-6 to calculate the maximum spacing, s, of the reinforcement that would satisfy the LRFD crack control requirement.

Page 68: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

To convert the required spacing to Caltrans’ Standard Plan Bridge Details, we must multiply the spacing by 2. This is due to the fact that the transverse deck reinforcement spacing diagrams add an extra top bar for the given spacing. Therefore, if the required calculated spacing is 5.29 in., then the spacing shown on the typical section would be 10.58 in. In the design example case, we would specify #6 @ S = 10 1/2 in.

Page 69: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-7 MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT

Minimum reinforcement is needed in the slab to distribute the load across the slab, for shrinkage, and temperature change. For the typical slab design, AASHTO requires distribution reinforcement for the top of the slab and the bottom of the slab.

Page 70: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-7A TOP OF SLAB SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE REINFORCEMENT

The top slab reinforcement is for shrinkage and temperature changes near the surface of the exposed concrete slab. The area of reinforcement has to meet the following requirements:

Page 71: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

For the design example slab:

Therefore, As = 0.11 as a minimum. Use #4 bars in top slab.

Bar area = 0.2 in².Bar Spacing=12(0.2)/0.11=21.8in

Use maximum 18.0 in.

Page 72: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

STEP-7B BOTTOM OF SLAB DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT

The reinforcement in the bottom of the slab is a percentage of the primary deck reinforcement. The primary deck reinforcement is perpendicular to the direction of traffic, therefore, the requirement is 220/S≤ 67 percent, where S is the effective span length (ft.) as specified in Article 9.7.2.3. For the design example, the effective span length is the clear distance from face of girder to face of girder, which is 11 ft.

Page 73: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

To facilitate better lateral load distribution, Caltrans’ Reinforced Concrete Technical Committee recommends that the bottom deck reinforcement be placed within the center half of the deck span. Therefore,

Twelve bars are distributed within 1/2 the effective span length. Compared this with the standard Deck Slab Reinforcement Details “G” bars and “D” bars per MTD Table 10-20.1(a): The required “G” bars for 12′-0″ girder spacing are 5 - #4

barsThe required “D” bars for 12′-0″ girder spacing are 13 - #5 bars

Page 74: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge

Figure-6 Bridge Deck Reinforcement Details

Page 75: Design of Deck for COMPLEX Concrete Bridge