11
Design effectiveness is improved and integration facilitated: 1. Simplify the design and reduce the number of parts because for each part, there is an opportunity for a defective part and an assembly error. The probability of a perfect product goes down exponentially as the number of parts increases. As the number of parts goes up, the total cost of fabricating and assembling the product goes up. Automation becomes more difficult and more expensive when more parts are handled and processed. Costs related to purchasing, stocking, and servicing also go down as the number of parts are reduced. Inventory and work-in-process levels will go down with fewer parts. As the product structure and required operations are simplified, fewer fabrication and assembly steps are required, manufacturing processes can be integrated and leadtimes further reduced. The designer should go through the assembly part by part and evaluate whether the part can be eliminated, combined with another part, or the function can be performed in another way. To determine the theoretical minimum number of parts, ask the following: Does the part move relative to all other moving parts? Must the part absolutely be of a different material from the other parts? Must the part be different to allow possible disassembly? 2. Standardize and use common parts and materials to facilitate design activities, to minimize the amount of inventory in the system, and to standardize handling and assembly operations. Common parts will result in lower inventories, reduced costs and higher quality. Operator learning is simplified and there is a greater opportunity for automation as the result of higher production volumes and operation standardization, Lean mfg product lines. Limit exotic or unique components because suppliers are less likely to compete on quality or cost for these components . Design for ease of fabrication. Select processes compatible with the materials and production volumes. Select materials compatible with production processes and that minimize processing time while meeting functional requirements. Avoid unnecessary part features because they involve extra processing effort and/or more complex tooling. Apply specific guidelines appropriate for the fabrication process such as the following guidelines for machinability:

Design for Manufacturability

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

overviewThe design for manufacturing of a product needs a careful contemplation on the *Selection of materials*Shapes*Manufacturing Processes*Consideration of manufacturability*Ease or difficulty in assembly of parts*Assessment of quality*Reliability*Cost-EffectivenessDesign for manufacturability is one of these parameters listed above.

Citation preview

Page 1: Design for Manufacturability

Design effectiveness is improved and integration facilitated:

1. Simplify the design and reduce the number of parts because for each part, there is an opportunity for a defective part and an assembly error. The probability of a perfect product goes down exponentially as the number of parts increases. As the number of parts goes up, the total cost of fabricating and assembling the product goes up. Automation becomes more difficult and more expensive when more parts are handled and processed. Costs related to purchasing, stocking, and servicing also go down as the number of parts are reduced. Inventory and work-in-process levels will go down with fewer parts. As the product structure and required operations are simplified, fewer fabrication and assembly steps are required, manufacturing processes can be integrated and leadtimes further reduced. The designer should go through the assembly part by part and evaluate whether the part can be eliminated, combined with another part, or the function can be performed in another way. To determine the theoretical minimum number of parts, ask the following: Does the part move relative to all other moving parts? Must the part absolutely be of a different material from the other parts? Must the part be different to allow possible disassembly?

2. Standardize and use common parts and materials to facilitate design activities, to minimize the amount of inventory in the system, and to standardize handling and assembly operations.

Common parts will result in lower inventories, reduced costs and higher quality.

Operator learning is simplified and there is a greater opportunity for automation as the result of higher production volumes and operation standardization, Lean mfg product lines.

Limit exotic or unique components because suppliers are less likely to compete on quality or cost for these components

. Design for ease of fabrication. Select processes compatible with the materials and production volumes. Select materials compatible with production processes and that minimize processing time while meeting functional requirements. Avoid unnecessary part features because they involve extra processing effort and/or more complex tooling. Apply specific guidelines appropriate for the fabrication process such as the following guidelines for machinability:

• For higher volume parts, consider castings or stampings to reduce machining.

• Use near net shapes for molded and forged parts to minimize machining and processing effort.

• Design for ease of fixturing by providing large solid mounting surface & parallel clamping surfaces

• Avoid designs requiring sharp corners or points in cutting tools - they break easier

• Avoid designs requiring sharp corners or points they are unsafe and cause injuries

• Avoid thin walls, thin webs, deep pockets or deep holes to withstand clamping & machining without distortion

• Avoid tapers & contours as much as possible in favor of rectangular shapes

Page 2: Design for Manufacturability

• Avoid undercuts which require special operations & tools

• Avoid hardened or difficult machined materials unless essential to requirements

• Put machined surfaces on same plane or with same diameter to minimize number of operations

• Design workpieces to use standard cutters, drill bit sizes or other tools

Avoid small holes (drill bit/punch breakage greater) & length to diameter ratio > 3 (chip clearance & straightness deviation)

4. Design within process capabilities and avoid unneeded surface finish requirements. Know the production process capabilities of equipment. Follow established manufacturing APPLIED PRACTICES ( 84A226035/41A323000) and S.I. (Standing Instructions: SI10359), Sheet Metal Manufacturing Requirements (84A216320), Heavy Fab (84A216320AB)

Avoid unnecessarily tight tolerances that are beyond the natural capability of the manufacturing processes. Otherwise, this will require that parts be inspected or screened for acceptability.

Avoid tight tolerances on multiple, connected parts. Tolerances on connected parts will "stack-up" making maintenance of overall product tolerance difficult.

Surface finish requirements likewise may be established based on standard practices and may be applied to interior surfaces resulting in additional costs where these requirements may not be needed.

Determine when new production process capabilities are needed early to allow sufficient time to determine optimal process parameters and establish a controlled process.

Design within the current production parameters. Consider Flow line Lean manufacturing principals, existing flow lines and takt times.

5. Mistake-proof product design and assembly (poke-yoke) so that the assembly process is unambiguous. Components should be designed so that they can only be assembled in one way; they cannot be reversed. Notches, symmetrical holes and stops can be used to mistake-proof the assembly process. Design verifiability into the product and its components. For mechanical products, verifiability can be achieved with simple go/no-go tools in the form of notches or natural stopping points. Products should be designed to avoid or simplify adjustments

6. Design for parts orientation and handling to minimize non-value-added manual effort and ambiguity in orienting and merging parts. Basic principles to facilitate parts handling and orienting are:

• Parts must be designed to consistently orient themselves when fed into a process.

• Product design must avoid parts which can become tangled, wedged or disoriented.

Page 3: Design for Manufacturability

• Part design should incorporate symmetry around both axes of insertion wherever possible. Where parts cannot be symmetrical, the asymmetry should be emphasized to assure correct insertion or easily identifiable feature should be provided.

• With hidden features that require a particular orientation, provide an external feature or guide surface to correctly orient the part.

• Guide surfaces should be provided to facilitate insertion. “Cup in a Cup”

• Parts should be designed with surfaces so that they can be easily grasped, placed and fixtured. Ideally this means flat, parallel surfaces that would allow a part to picked-up by a person and then easily fixtured or assembled.

• Avoid very small parts that are difficult to pick-up or require a tool such as a tweezers to pick-up. This will increase handling and orientation time.

• Avoid parts with sharp edges, burrs or points. These parts can injure workers or customers, they require more careful handling, they can damage product finishes, and they may be more susceptible to damage themselves if the sharp edge is an intended feature.

• DefinitionOrigami is an ancient art of folding various mediums, most commonly paper. Other materials often folded are fabric, wire mesh, sheet metal, tissue, thin plastic, cardboard, and straws. The word comes from the combination of the Japanese verb oru (to fold) and the noun kami (paper).

Traditional methods of creating sheet metal or plate assemblies employ single part geometries combined together by some form of assembly and weld. This requires storing and retrieving a variety of parts to produce an accumulation for assembly. Utilizing our current manufacturing capabilities, we have introduced a method for integrating parts of common spec and thickness into a single geometry. By utilizing an ancient technique known as Origami, we have developed a method of hand bending/forming simple to complex geometries. Locally termed “Warrengami

Integrated Modularity Design

Warrengami: Hand Bend Part Forming

Advantages of Part Integration (Case dependent).

1. Reduced Inventory.

2. Reduce B7 stacker accumulations from 2 to 1 or 2 to none thereby reducing daywork labor.

3. Avoid/reduce secondary operations: i.e.: layout welding, snagging

4. Sub assembly set up and ticket labor reduction (all parts included in single geometry)

5. Decreased lead time

Page 4: Design for Manufacturability

6. Fixture elimination

Locational Slot and Tab Assembly

(NOT WARRENGAMI)

Integrated Part Fixturing of Assemblies.

• Tabs should be on one linear edge plane only, begin tab from either end, second tab

must be on or near the opposite end of part.

• Tab length should be a minimum of .50 to a max. of 1.0 inch long.

• Tab height should be 2/3 material thickness of adjoining part. When required, this will

allow plug welding and sanding without compromising the weld plug.

• Slots should be .0312 larger in length and width than associated tab, with each centered

over the nominal dimension.

Add one additional tab equally spaced for each 4 feet of length

Design modular products (HLA: High Level Assembly) to facilitate assembly with building block components and subassemblies. This modular or building block design should minimize the number of part or assembly variants early in the manufacturing process while allowing for greater product variation late in the process during final assembly. This approach minimizes the total number of items to be manufactured, thereby reducing inventory and improving quality. Modules can be manufactured and tested before final assembly. The short final assembly lead time can result in a wide variety of products being made to a customer's order in a short period of time without having to stock a significant level of inventory. Production of standard modules can be leveled and repetitive flow schedules established.

Product Standardization: Design it in, Maintain it’s integrity.

Mistake-Proofing a product's design and its manufacturing process is a key element of design for manufacturability / assembly (DFM/A). Mistake proofing is also a key element of improving product quality and reliability and an element of the design for six sigma (DFSS) concept. A difficult to assemble product is more likely to be assembled incorrectly.

The Japanese concept of Poka-Yoke (mistake-proofing) is oriented to finding and correcting problems as close to the source as possible because finding and correcting defects caused by errors costs more and more as a product or item flows through a process. Early work on poke-yoke by Japanese authorities like Shingo focused on mistake-proofing the process after a product has been designed and is in production. As time has passed, more emphasis has been placed on how to design the product to avoid mistakes in production. Often the benefits of mistake-proofing not only help

Page 5: Design for Manufacturability

with production of the product, but can also contribute to correct user operation and maintenance of the product, and servicing of the product.

The concept of Mistake-Proofing involves:

• Controls or features in the product or process to prevent or mitigate the occurrence of errors (WarrenGami/Integrated Slot and Tab Fixturing, Symmetry)

• Simple, inexpensive inspection (error detection) at the end of each successive operation to discover and correct defects at the source.

• Ideally, mistake-proofing should be considered during the development of a new product to maximize opportunities to mistake-proof through design of the product and the process (elimination, replacement, prevention and facilitation). Once the product is designed and the process is selected, mistake proofing opportunities are more limited (prevention, facilitation, detection and mitigation).

• 1 We can often get too cute and complex around our attempts to mistake proof a process, taking long evaluation times and spending lots of money, when we should really be looking for simple, low cost, and quick to implement solutions

• 2 That mistake-proofing, while having a True North goal of “mistake-proofed” does not have to be about finding the ultimate solution that can prevent any possible cause of error by any person on any day from any method. It is about finding quick, cheap, simple, easy ways to reduce the risk that an operator can do a critical task incorrectly, and through continuous improvement, to keep enhancing ways to reduce that risk over time.

• Remember: “bunts and singles, bunts and singles, just lots of em! We still love the odd “out of the park” home-run, but we will win our game mostly through bunts and singles.”

• Dan McDonnell

Simple Rules for understanding/predicting Weld Distortion

Page 6: Design for Manufacturability
Page 7: Design for Manufacturability
Page 8: Design for Manufacturability